35
What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

What Have We Learned So Far?

A Theoretical Perspective

Miklos GyulassyColumbia University

January 16, 2004

Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Page 2: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

NSAC Long Range Plan 1983

RHIC

Page 3: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

“He is tethered to a tree and constrained by a fence, but the chain is not secure and the fence is low enough to leap over.

The unicorn could escape if he wished. Clearly, however, his confinement is a happy one, to which the ripe, seed-laden pomegranates in the tree testify.”

R.Stock QM04:“Unicorn Captured”

http://www.medieval-tapestry-wallhangings.com/unincap1.html

Page 4: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

“The QM04 conference left me with contradictory impressions:

On the one hand, most scientists seem to think that we’re getting closer to identifying a quark-gluon plasma.

On the other hand, there seemed to be significant disagreement on what a quark-gluon plasma IS! “

QM04 Dilemma: J.K. Davidson,  Science Writer,  S.F.Chron.

Outline of My Talk:1)QCD Theory definition of QGP2)Operational definition of QGP3)Evidence for QGP as of QM044)First hints of CGC

Page 5: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

PQCD theory definition of a QGP

B>0 EoS

B

LQCD B>0

QGP EoS

T

B

P(T)

TFamily

T=1.6 Tc

LQCD

QGP EoS vs T

P/PSB

T/Tc2sc dP /d

Speed of QGP sound

QGP Soft point

Tc=160 MeV

Page 6: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

pQCD theory definition of a QGP

Thermal Rates

TransportProperties

TransportProperties

TE(p ,M, ,L)

Energy Loss

Thermal

pT

Lrad

Page 7: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Weak coupling QCD theory of CGC seed of QGP

Color Glass

Small x

Large x

5glue

A 2 2T T

d N

dyd k d r

2A AxG (x,Q )

Page 8: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

QGP = Bulk Collective + Parton Dynamic + Discriminator

= PQCD + pQCD + dA

My Operational definition of QGP

My conclusion: “overwhelming evidence” at QM04that QGP Bulk Matter is made in AuAu at 200 AGeV

1) Evidence for PQCD via vn bulk collective flow of 104 , K,p,

= vn(pT,m)

1

2) Evidence for pQCD jet quenching in Au+Au at RHIC

+ (R+I)AA

2

3) Evidence jet un-quenching in D+Au = Null Control

+ (R+I)DA

3

2+3 are necessary but 1 is critical for sufficiency !

Page 9: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

10

1

WA97/NA57

Nparticipants

Pb+Pb

103100

p+Pb

NA50

NA49

Necessary QGP Precursors at SPS 2000

/Drell-Yan

Hadro Chemical EquilibCollective Flow

Medium Dispersion

pQCD

WA98

Page 10: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

CERES/SPS

Below RHIC energies, Bulk Flow does not reach QGP hydro!

2 2chdN /dyd x (fm )-

^

17 AGeV

CERES 17 AGeV

But Critical Missing Signature of the QGP at SPS

Page 11: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Asym. pQCD Jet Quenching

Bulk PQCD Hydro

qn Coalescence

The QGP Fingerprint at RHIC = Bulk collective flow PQCD(T)

Page 12: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Jet Quenching

pQCD Parton Dynamics

Jet Tomography

2nd and 3rd Lines of Evidence for QGP

Page 13: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA
Page 14: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Single Hadron Tomography from SPS, RHIC, LHC

1. Cronin dominates at SPS

2. Cronin+Quench+Shadow

conspire to give ~ flat

suppression out to highest pT

at RHIC with R~Npart/Nbin

3. Predicts sub Npart quench,

positive pT slope of R at LHC

and RLHC(40)~RRHIC(40)

Ivan Vitev and M.G, Phys.Rev.Lett. 89 (2002)

Page 15: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

D+Au vs Au+Au @ 200 GeV:

IV,MG(02)

dNglue/dy= 1000

Single JetTomography

Jet-Jet Corr.

trig4 6 GeV/c

0.2 4 GeV/c

T

assocT

p

p

Soft-Jet CorrelationsDi-Jet Tomography

RHIC BaryonAnomaly

Page 16: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Four independent calibrations of Initial QGP density

1. Bjorken Backward extrapolation

2. Hydrodynamic initial condition needed for v2(pT)

3. Jet Tomography: dNg /dy = 1000

4. Gluon saturation pT<Qs predicted dNg /dy = 1000 at Qsat = 1 GeV at y=0

T

2 30 0

3Bj 0

E /N 0.5 GeV, dN /dy 1000,

1/p 0.2 fm/c, V (0.2fm) R 30 fm

500Gev/30 fm 100

p p= =

t = = = p =

e = = e

3Hydro Bj 02 500Gev/30 fm 100e > e = = e

J ets Bj 0100e » e » e

30 0( ) 100 15 GeV/fmet » e =

KHHTS HN

GLVWW SW

BMMcVEKRT

Page 17: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

The END of searching for the QGP

The BEGINNING of measuring its properties

• 12D Correlations• Heavy Quarks• Direct Photons • Leptons• and its relation to CGC

trig4 6 GeV/c

0.2 4 GeV/c

T

assocT

p

p

C2

v2

Page 18: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

• Indirectly, yes, as seed of QGP at y=0

• Possible Hints at y=3 (BRAHMS)

• But 30 year old soft beam physics Must be first subtracted !

Has the CGC been seen at RHIC also?

Page 19: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Soft Beam Jets : dM/M Dominate Low pT at high y

Beam Jets

Beam + Mini Jets

3

See: http://nt3.phys.columbia.edu/people/gyulassy/Talks/RBRC_120503/

D+Au HIJING

Page 20: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Proton+Emulsion dataW. Busza review 1976(Acta Phys. Pol. B8, 333)

Brodsky, Gunion, Kuhn

PRL39(77)1120

Color Neutralization Model

Feynman gas dy=dx/x= dM/M

The low pT TriangleBoundary ConditionCondition on RpA(y,pT<1)

Page 21: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Preliminary: Hot-off-the-QM04-coffee-table

Addendum to Di Nezza, Steinberg talks

Page 22: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

While QGP reflects

onCGC

TheQGP

istamed

Page 23: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Appendix

Page 24: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

The D+Au triangle

RdAu(pT<1,y)

1.0

0.5

0.3

0.7

A Low pT<0.5 Triangle boundary controls forward rapidity RdA D/Au

Page 25: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Experimental To Do List

•-5 < Y < 5 dAu to kinematic pT bounds CGC search •C2(phi1,phi2, pt1,pt2, eta1,eta2, fl1,fl2, Mult, A,B, Ecm)

• Heavy Quark tomography c and b, Hidden quarkonia

• Charm and Beauty Flow

• Direct Photons thermometry

• Tagged direct photon -quark jets!

• Excitation functions Ecm~50-100, A=1 - 200

• Pentaquark factory

Page 26: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Theory To Do List

• HBT source puzzle

• ET/N Ecm invariance, Npart invariance

• vn(pT, y, m) collective flow

• Transport properties of QGP

• Baryon transport dynamics

• Transient CGC -> QGP dynamics

• QGP at finite muB

Page 27: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

RHIC

QGP1

3

2

2

3

1

BulkPQCD

PartonpQCD

Null Control

1. Bulk PQCD Collective Elliptic Flow2. Parton pQCD Jet dynamics3. p+p Calibration and d+A Null Control

Three Lines Converge to QGP at RHIC

QGP =PQCD + pQCD + dA = v2 + (R+I) AA + (R+I)dA

Page 28: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Partonic Recombination

+ Fragmentation?

•Parameterized flow•How to justify assumed vT~0.55c at T=Tc?•Idealized hard sphere geom

•Flow is dynamically calculated PQCD•Radial flow in hadron phase is also important. At T=Tc, <vT>~0.25c T=100 MeV, <vT>~0.55c

R.Fries, B. Muller, …R.Fries, B. Muller, … T.Hirano & Y.NaraT.Hirano & Y.Nara

QGP Hydro + Jetsvs

Page 29: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Jet Quenching

XN Wang, MG

Gluon Shadow

P0=2GeV

Cronin

Shadow

Page 30: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Some Source Fits giving Rout=Rside=RK

out f

dNdx dt

K3 R

outˆx r K

tf

233

0 0 K2 ooR(K)

f3) (x (x )xx R )

out fo

x tx

2

3

K12R

f 0 out 0 K

K

11) (t ) (x x x 12 R )

12R

1

out 0 f K

K

12) (x x ) ( t 12R )

12R

2

K12R

ox

222 2out out K f out K f out fR x v t x v t (x t )

Invisible Dimension!

out fo

x tx

2

Page 31: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Drell-Yan andProduction at CERN/SPS

C. Lourenco NA50 QM01

( ) ( )DY DYA B q q AB pp ( ) !( )A B c c AB pp

Suppressed even in p+A !!

Page 32: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Results from the SPS

• data well described by pQCD + (intrinsic + initial) kT (A,Q) broadenning• data equally well described by hydrodynamic fit

A. Dress QM01

However,No RutherfordPower Law Tail

Page 33: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

Statistical Models Work Well at SPS and RHIC

Statistical Thermal ModelsF. Becattini; P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, D. Magestro, J.Rafelski, J.Sollfrank et al. K.Redlich

* Works great, but there is not word of QCD in such analysis. Done entirely in color neutral Hadronic basis!

An equilibrated (Hagadorn) resonance gas was made

But shows no sign of a QGP !!

Page 34: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

P+A Control Experiment

NA50 PbPb->J/Psi Suppression

Effect does not turn offWhen medium is absent!

Qui, Vary

Predicted Non-linear Initial State radiative energy loss in Cold A must be still tested via Central pA at both SPS and RHIC

ccqq

PartonicDiagnostics

Page 35: What Have We Learned So Far? A Theoretical Perspective Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University January 16, 2004 Quark Matter 2004, Oakland CA

The D+Au triangle

RdAu(pT<1,y)

1.0

0.5

0.3

0.7

A Low pT<0.5 Triangle boundary controls forward rapidity RdA D/Au