Upload
pauline-stevens
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
Avian and Human InfluenzaPandemic PreparednessAHI
Rome, June 28, 2007
Pandemic Preparedness for the Humanitarian
CommunityWith the Pandemic Influenza
Contingency (PIC) Support Team
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
1 Planning Framework – 4 Objectives
ImplementationApproachChallengesFramework
Staff Health and Safety Business Continuity
New Programmes New Services
Implement measures that may minimize impact on
Staff health and safety
Maintain operational continuity
(programme and infrastructure)
Identify and address food security needs
of possible new beneficiary caseloads
Contribute to a system-wide effort
to prepare for, prevent and combat
AHI
A B
C D
Framework
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
64 53
~ 2-3 weeks ~ 12-18 months
~ 4-6 weeks
1
~ 4-6 weeks
Lockdown Mode
Crisis Mode
LockdownMode
CrisisMode
CrisisMode
Prep.Mode
ImplementationApproachChallenges
Possible Pandemic Timeline
• Time-scale – not a single event!!• Long term norms change• Tested / resilient systems
Key planning considerations
ChallengesFramework
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
111
22
Market Disruptions
2
• Market Changes:• Commodities, Services, Staff, Fuel• Supply & demand will be affected (therefore Price)• Imposed restrictions (borders, freedom of movement,
protectionism)
• Increase in demand for humanitarian logistics services:
• Increased complexity of supplying existing humanitarian crises
• New Humanitarian crises• Geographic spread of the needsLogistics Challenges
•Sea (shipping, port operations)•Surface (road, train, borders crossings)•Air transport (cargo, humanitarian workers, evacuation)•Storage
ImplementationApproachChallengesChallengesFramework
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
22
33
11 Prioritization1
Partnerships2
Planning3
ImplementationApproachApproachChallengesFramework
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
•Using MapleCroft approach•Based on FAO, WHO, WB, OiE data
•Hardship classification done by ICSC (International Civil Service Commission)
ImplementationApproachApproachChallengesFramework
11 Prioritization1
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
ImplementationApproachApproachChallengesFramework
11 Prioritization1
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
Core Target (8+1 countries)Country Office AHI risk Beneficiaries MT Staff
Afghanistan High risk
4,856,466
197,417 1,079
Congo (DRC). Extreme risk
1,560,000
77,787 339
Ethiopia Extreme risk
5,231,822
527,131 434
Indonesia Extreme risk
2,921,500
121,618 498
Kenya Extreme risk
3,257,181
213,087 260
Pakistan Extreme risk
2,030,763
150,460 497
Sudan High risk
6,926,251
632,952 1,727
Uganda Extreme risk
2,586,806
237,871 419
Total priority COs 29,370,789 2,158,322 5,253
Total WFP
87,000,000
4,245,528 11,447
Percentage 34% 51% 46%
+ Nigeria
ImplementationApproachApproachChallengesFramework
11 Prioritization1
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
222 Partnerships
•Partners in Pandemic Preparedness:• UNSIC, PICs, participating Agencies and Donors • to ensure the Log’s CONOPS is in support to the
overarching objectives of the UN System
•Humanitarian Partners:•To anticipate needs & capacities•To understand and manage expectations
•Private Sector:•To understand their BCP•To build strategic partnerships
•Civil and Military:•To understand their role in quarantine enforcement•To anticipate use of Military & Civil Defense assets (nat’l & internat’l)
ImplementationApproachApproachChallengesFramework
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
333 Planning
•Common objectives
ImplementationApproachApproachChallengesFramework
In order to support
NationalPreparedness and
Response
In order to maintainand sustain
Operation capacity
Minimize apandemic’s impact on
Staff Health & Safety
•Common planning standard=> Based on similar guidelines
=> Global contingency planning effort
•Anchored on UNCT paradigm=> Inter-Agency
=> Country-specific
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
LogisticsImplementation
Next Steps – Implementation plans
PrioritizationPreparednessThe Threat
A
B
C
Share:•planning assumptions•baseline data
Engage and test:•Ensure engagement of all stakeholders•Consolidate a civil society ownership•Test assumptions and plans•Develop protocols (SOPs)
Aim for:•Multi-sectorial joint operation response•Robustness and flexibility•Reinforced resilience of the systems
Rome, June 28, 2007WFP – Avian & Human Influenza Preparedness
Avian and Human InfluenzaPandemic PreparednessAHI
Rome, June 28, 2007
Pandemic Preparedness for the Humanitarian
CommunityWith the Pandemic Influenza
Contingency (PIC) Support Team