35
WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management Akm Saiful Islam Lecture-9: Statistical Downscaling Techniques March, 2013 Institute of Water and Flood Management (IWFM) Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET)

WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Akm Saiful Islam. WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management. Lecture-9: Statistical Downscaling Techniques. Institute of Water and Flood Management (IWFM) Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). March, 2013. Topics. Approach of downscaling Techniques of downscaling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

Akm Saiful Islam

Lecture-9: Statistical Downscaling Techniques

March, 2013

Institute of Water and Flood Management (IWFM)Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET)

Page 2: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Topics

Approach of downscaling Techniques of downscaling Strength and weakness Statistical downscaling using SDSM

Page 3: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

General Approach to Downscaling

Applicable to:

•Sub-grid scales (small islands, point processes)

•Complex/ heterogeneous environments

•Extreme events

•Exotic predictands

•Transient change/ ensembles

Page 4: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Page 5: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Types of downscaling

Dynamical climate modelling Synoptic weather typing Stochastic weather generation Transfer-function approaches

Page 6: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Dynamic downscaling Dynamical downscaling involves the nesting of a

higher resolution Regional Climate Model (RCM) within a coarser resolution GCM.

The RCM uses the GCM to define time–varying atmospheric boundary conditions around a finite domain, within which the physical dynamics of the atmosphere are modelled using horizontal grid spacings of 20–50 km.

Page 7: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Limitations of RCM The main limitation of RCMs is that they are as

computationally demanding as GCMs (placing constraints on the feasible domain size, number of experiments and duration of simulations).

The scenarios produced by RCMs are also sensitive to the choice of boundary conditions (such as soil moisture) used to initiate experiments

Page 8: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Advantages of RCM

The main advantage of RCMs is that they can resolve smaller–scale atmospheric features such as orographic precipitation or low–level jets better than the host GCM.

Furthermore, RCMs can be used to explore the relative significance of different external forcings such as terrestrial–ecosystem or atmospheric chemistry changes.

Page 9: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Regional Climate Model

Limited area regional models require meteorological information at their edges (lateral boundaries)

These data provide the interface between the regional model’s domain and the rest of the world

The climate of a region is always strongly influenced by the global situation

These data are necessarily provided by global general circulation models

(GCMs) or from observed datasets with global coverage

Page 10: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Page 11: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Weather classification: LWT scheme to condition daily rainfall

Page 12: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Weather typing

Weather typing approaches involve grouping local, meteorological data in relation to prevailing patterns of atmospheric circulation. Climate change scenarios are constructed, either by re–sampling from the observed data distributions (conditional on the circulation patterns produced by a GCM), or by generating synthetic sequences of weather patterns and then re–sampling from observed data.

Page 13: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Weather pattern downscaling is founded on sensible linkages between climate on the large scale and weather at the local scale.

The technique is also valid for a wide variety of environmental variables as well as multi–site applications. However, weather typing schemes ca be parochial, a poor basis for downscaling rare events, and entirely dependent on stationary circulation–to–surface climate relationships.

Page 14: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Limitation of Weather typing

Potentially, the most serious limitation is that precipitation changes produced by changes in the frequency of weather patterns are seldom consistent with the changes produced by the host GCM (unless additional predictors such as atmospheric humidity are employed)

Page 15: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Stochastic weather generators

Stochastic downscaling approaches typically involve modifying the parameters of conventional weather generators such as WGEN, LARS–WG or EARWIG.

The WGEN model simulates precipitation occurrence.

Furthermore, stochastic weather generators enable the efficient production of large ensembles of scenarios for risk analysis.

Page 16: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Weather generator

WGEN model simulates precipitation occurrence using two–state, first order Markov chains: precipitation amounts on wet days using a gamma distribution;

temperature and radiation components using first–order trivariate autoregression that is conditional on precipitation occurrence.

Page 17: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Page 18: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Page 19: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Page 20: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Advantages of weather generator Climate change scenarios are generated

stochastically using revised parameter sets scaled in line with the outputs from a host GCM.

The main advantage of the technique is that it can exactly reproduce many observed climate statistics and has been widely used, particularly for agricultural impact assessment.

Page 21: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Limitations weather generator

The key disadvantages relate to the low skill at reproducing inter-annual to decadal climate variability, and to the unanticipated effects that changes to precipitation occurrence may have on secondary variables such as temperature.

Page 22: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Transfer functions

Transfer-function downscaling methods rely on empirical relationships between local scale predictands and regional scale predictor(s). Individual downscaling schemes differ according to the choice of mathematical transfer function, predictor variables or statistical fitting procedure.

Page 23: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Page 24: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Types of transfer functions

To date, linear and non–linear regression, artificial neural networks, canonical correlation and principal components analyses have all been used to derive predictor–predictand relationships.

Page 25: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Strength and weakness of transfer function The main strength of transfer function

downscaling is the relative ease of application, coupled with their use of observable trans–scale relationships.

The main weakness is that the models often explain only a fraction of the observed climate variability (especially in precipitation series).

Page 26: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

SDSM Developed by Loughborogh university, UK www.sdsm.org.uk

Data can be downloaded from Canadian Climate Change Scenario network (CCSN)

http://www.cccsn.ca/?page=dst-sdi SDSM is best described as a hybrid of the stochastic

weather generator and transfer function methods.

Page 27: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

SDSM- Statistical Downscaling Model

Page 28: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

SDSM Algorithm

Optimisation Algorithm: SDSM 4.2 provides two means of optimising the model – Dual Simplex (as in earlier versions of SDSM) and Ordinary Least Squares. Although both approaches give comparable results, ordinary Least Squares is much faster.

Page 29: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

The User can also select a Stepwise Regression model by ticking the appropriate box.

Stepwise regression: works by progressively adding all parameters into the model and selecting the model which models the predictand most strongly according to one of two criteria: either AIC(Akaike information criterion) or BIC(Bayesian information criterion).

Page 30: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

The Akaike information criterion is a measure of the relative goodness of fit of a statistical model.

In statistics, the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) or Schwarz criterion (also SBC, SBIC) is a criterion for model selection among a finite set of models.

When fitting models, it is possible to increase the likelihood by adding parameters, but doing so may result in overfitting. The BIC resolves this problem by introducing a penalty term for the number of parameters in the model. The penalty term is larger in BIC than in AIC.

Page 31: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Patuakhali Tmin(1961-2001):

Predictor variable Partial r

Ncepmslpas (mean sea level pressure)

0.763

ncepp500as (500 hpa geopotential height)

0.308

ncepp850as (850 hpa geopotential height)

0.61

ncepr850as (relative humidity at 850 hpa)

0.383

Mean E% 34.2

Mean SE 1.461

Page 32: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Page 33: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Page 34: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam

Page 35: WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management

WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam