34
Wetlands Bureau Decision Report Decisions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/20 16 DISCLAIMER: This document is published for information purposes only and does not constitute an authorization to conduct work. Work in jurisdiction may not commence until the applicant has received a posting permit. Decisions are subject to appeal, and are reviewed by the federal agencies for compliance with Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. APPEAL: Any party aggrieved by a decision may file an appeal within 30 days of the date of this decision as specified in RSA 482-A:l0, RSA 21-0:14, and the rules adopted by the Wetlands Council, Env-WtC 100-200. The appeal must be filed directly with the Council, c/o the Council Appeals Clerk, who may be contacted at (603) 271-6072 or at ppeals(ades.nh.gov . The notice of appeal must set forth hilly every ground upon which it is claimed that the decision complained of is unlawfiil or unreasonable. Only those grounds set forth in the notice of appeal can be considered by the council.

Wetlands Bureau Decision Report - New Hampshire · PDF fileDecision Report 2 02 ... Lily Pond Requested Action: Proposal to retain 8,375 sq. ft. of fill in ... suspended particles

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Wetlands Bureau Decision ReportDecisions Taken

02/08/2016 to 02/14/20 16

DISCLAIMER:

This document is published for information purposes only and does not constitute an authorization to conduct work.

Work in jurisdiction may not commence until the applicant has received a posting permit.

Decisions are subject to appeal, and are reviewed by the federal agencies for compliance with Section 404 of the Federal

Clean Water Act.

APPEAL:

Any party aggrieved by a decision may file an appeal within 30 days of the date of this decision as specified in

RSA 482-A:l0, RSA 21-0:14, and the rules adopted by the Wetlands Council, Env-WtC 100-200.

The appeal must be filed directly with the Council, c/o the Council Appeals Clerk, who may be contacted at

(603) 271-6072 or at ppeals(ades.nh.gov . The notice of appeal must set forth hilly every ground upon which

it is claimed that the decision complained of is unlawfiil or unreasonable. Only those grounds set forth in the

notice of appeal can be considered by the council.

Decision Report 2 02/16/2016for Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

MAJOR IMPACT PROJECT

2015-02017 SOMERSWORTH, CITY OFSOMERSWORTH Lily Pond

Requested Action:Proposal to retain 8,375 sq. ft. of fill in wetland in two locations for the expansion of the 4th and 7th fairways for an existing 18-holegolf course on 288 acres. This work is part of the overall development of the golf course covered under Wetlands Permit#1998-00539. Compensatory mitigation consists of preservation in a conservation easement, to beheld by the City of Somersworth,of 19.04 acres (4.25 acres of wetlands, and 14.79 acres of uplands).** * * * * ******* **** * *** * *********

Conservation CommissionlStaff Comments:8/6/15 - No historic properties affected per DHR.

APPROVE AFTER THE FACT:Retain 8,375 sq. ft. of fill in wetland in two locations for the expansion of the 4th and 7th fairways for an existing 1$-hole golf courseon 28$ acres. This work is part of the overall development of the golf course covered under Wetlands Permit #1998-00539.Compensatory mitigation consists of preservation in a conservation easement, to be held by the City of Somersworth, of 19.04 acres(4.25 acres of wetlands, and 14.79 acres of uplands).

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Connecticut Valley Environmental Services, Inc. dated June 17, 2015 as receivedby the NH Department of Environmental Services (DES) on August 3, 2015.2. There shall be no further alteration of wetlands for lot development, driveways, culverts, or for septic setback.3. Any further alteration of areas on this property that are subject to RSA 482-A jurisdiction will require a new application andfurther permitting.

Wetland preservation:1. This approval is not valid until the app1icant/owier executes and records the conservation easement on 19.04 acres as depicted onplans titled Salmon Falls Conservation Parcel, Sheet 6 of 6, prepared by Connecticut Valley Environmental Services, Inc. andreceived by DES on December 14, 2015.2. The conservation easements to be placed on the preservation areas shall be written to run with the land, and both existing andfuture property owners shall be subject to this easement.3. The plan noting the conservation easement with a copy of the final easement language shall be recorded with the StraffordRegistry of Deeds Office for each appropriate lot that is subject to the easement. The pennittee shall submit a copy of the recordingfrom the Strafford County Registry of Deeds to the DES Wetlands Program.4. The permittee shall prepare a baseline documentation report that describes current property conditions and includes photographsthat have been taken in the absence of snow cover that clearly and accurately show the nature and condition of the conservation area.

5. The conservation easement area shall be surveyed by a licensed surveyor, and marked by monuments [stakes]. If this surveydetermines the parcel is less than the size represented in the application, the permittee shall submit the completed survey to DES forreview. As a result of this review, DES may require additional mitigation adjustments after coordination with the appropriateConservation Commission(s), and State and federal Agencies.6. The permittee/permittees contractor shall notify the DES Wetlands Program when the easement monuments are placed, andcoordinate an on-site review of their location.7. There shall be no placement of fill, construction of structures, or storage of vehicles or hazardous materials on the conservationparcel.8. Activities in contravention of the conservation easement shall be deemed to be a violation of RSA 482-A, and shall be subject toenforcement under RSA 482-A.

Decision Report 3 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

With Findings:I. This is a major impact project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.02(c) and (1), projects that involve alteration of non-tidal

wetlands in excess of 20,000 sq. ft. in the aggregate and projects which, when taken in the aggregate with previous work on the

property within the last 5 years, would be considered major. The applicant completed this unauthorized fill in wetlands in or around

February 2008 which was within 5 years of construction of the golf course and after expiration of DES Wetlands Permit

#1998-00539.2. The DES issued Letter of Deficiency, WET 08-005, on March 10, 2008 for the unauthorized fill in wetlands for the 4th and 7th

fairways and impact within conservation areas on the property. Impacts to the conservation areas are restored. 3. The need for the

proposed wetland impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01. The applicant has demonstrated that 8,375

square feet of additional fill within forested wetlands is necessary to improve the playability of golf holes #4 and #7.

4. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areas

and environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03. The applicant has demonstrated that the wetlands filled are

along the edge of the wetland systems.5. Pursuant to Env-Wt 302.03, the applicant has further mitigated for the impacts by placing 19.04 acres (4.25 acres of wetlands and

14.79 acres of uplands) in a conservation easement to beheld by the City of Sornersworth.

6. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 302.04(a), Requirements for Application

Evaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.7. There were no species of concern reported for the project vicinity by the NH Natural Heritage Bureau.

8. The Somersworth Conservation Commission did not oppose the application.

9. In accordance with RSA 428-A:8, DES finds that the requirements for a public hearing do not apply as the permitted project is

not of substantial public interest, and will not have a significant impact on or adversely affect the values of the resource, as identified

under RSA 482-A: 1.

2015-02352 BOURNIVAL, ANDREA

GILfORB Lalce Winnipesaukee

Requested Action:Remove 2.8 sq. ft. from an existing wharf replace two tie-off piling, drive two additional piling to create a 3 piling ice-cluster, install

permanent boatlift, a 14 ft. x 30 ft. seasonal canopy, and two seasonal personal watercraft lifts adjacent to docking facilities

consisting of a 41 linear ft curved breakwater abutting a 43 ft. concrete pier, 26 ft. 11 in. x 35 ft. 9 in. boathouse, and a 14 ft. 7 in. x

46 ft. 3 in. crib pier all extending from a 96 ft. wharf on an average of 203 ft. of frontage along Varney Point, Lake Winnipesaukee,

in Gilford.************************************

Conservation CommissioniStaff Comments:9/8/15 Con. Corn. reqtlests a “hold” until they can review the application at their next meeting and may also consider a site

inspection.9/21/15 Con. Corn. voted to recommend approval as per plan and application and subject to the normal siltation measured be taken.

APPROVE PERMIT:Remove 2.8 sq. ft. from an existing wharf, replace two tie-off piling, drive two additional piling to create a 3 piling ice-cluster, install

permanent boatlift, a 14 ft. x 30 ft. seasonal canopy, and two seasonal personal watercraft lifts adjacent to docking facilities

consisting of a 41 linear ft curved breakwater abutting a 43 ft. concrete pier, 26 ft. 11 in. x 35 ft. 9 in. boathouse, and a 14 ft. 7 in. x

46 ft. 3 in. crib pier all extending from a 96 ft. wharf on an average of 203 ft. of frontage along Varney Point, Lake Winnipesaukee,

in Gilford.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Watermark Marine Construction dated August 25, 2015, as received by DES on

DecisionReport 4 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

September 8, 2015.2. This permit is not valid and effective until it has been recorded with the appropriate county Registry of Deeds by the applicant.Prior to starting work under this permit, the permitted shall submit a copy of the recorded permit to the DES Wetlands Program bycertified mail, return receipt requested.3. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA483-B and N.H. Code of Administrative Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.4. Work authorized shall be carried out such that there are no discharges in or to spawning or nursery areas during spawningseasons. Impacts to such areas shall be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable during all other times of the year.5. Work shall be carried out in a time and manner to avoid disturbances to migratory waterfowl breeding and nesting areas.6. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction such that noturbidity escapes the inmiediate dredge area and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and water at the work site hasreturned to normal clarity.7. All construction-related debris shall be placed outside of the areas subject to RSA 482-A. 8. Any subdivision of the propertywill require removal of a sufficient portion of the docking structures to comply with the dock size and density requirements in effectat the time of the subdivision.9. Only those structures shown on the approved plans shall be installed or constructed along this frontage. All portions of thestructures, including the breakwater toe of slope, shall be at least 20 ft. from the abutting property lines or the imaginary extension ofthose lines into the water.10. All seasonal structures, including watercraft lifts, shall be removed for the non-boating season.11. The canopy, including the support frame and cover, shall be designed and constructed to be readily removed at the end of theboating season and the flexible canopy shall be removed for the non-boating season.

With Findings:1. This project is classified as a major project per Rule Env-Wt 303.02(d), modification of a major docking facility.2. The applicant has an average of 203 ft. of frontage along Lake Winnipesaukee.3. A maximum of 3 slips may be permitted on this frontage per Rule Env-Wt 402.13, Frontage Over 75’.4. The existing docking facility provides 5 slips as defined per RSA 482-A:2, VIII and therefore exceeds Rule Env-Wt 402.13.5. The proposed modifications will do add slips to the docking facilities.6. Public hearing is waived with the finding that the project impacts will not significantly impair the resources of LakeWinnipesaukee.

-Send to Governor and Executive Council-

2015-02456 LEBANON, CITY OFLEBANON Unnamed Wetland

Requested Action:Dredge and fill 34,254 square feet of palustrine wetlands and a perennial stream for the construction of approximately 2 miles ofmulti-use rail trail known as the Mascoma River Greenway. Work in jurisdiction includes 1,608 square feet, 131 linear feet, of bankstabilization on the Mascoma River and 32,646 square feet of palustrine wetland impacts for trail and slope work. CompensatoryMitigation for the direct impacts of 8,809 square feet consists of a one-time payment of $38,794.24.**** ** * * * *** ************************

APPROVE PERMIT:Dredge and fill 34,254 square feet of palustrine wetlands and a perennial stream for the construction of approximately 2 miles ofmulti-use rail trail known as the Mascoma River Greentvay. Work in jurisdiction includes 1,608 square feet, 131 linear feet, of bankstabilization on the Mascoma River and 32,646 square feet of palustrine wetland impacts for trail and slope work. CompensatoryMitigation for the direct impacts of 8,809 square feet consists of a one-time payment of $38,794.24.

With Conditions:

Decision Report 5 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Fay, Spofford & Thorudike entitled City of Lebanon, Department of Public

Works, Wetland Impact Plans, Mascorna River Greenway (Sheets 1-5; 7-41) dated 8/15 as received by DES on September 16, 2015;

plans by Fay, Spofford & Thorudike, Now Stantec, entitled Mascoma River Greenway: Typical Section and Miscellaneous Detail

dated 0 1/16 as received by DES on Januaty 22, 2016; and plans by Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Now Stantec, entitled Mascoma

River Greenway: Typical Section as received by DES on February 12, 2016.2. This approval is contingent on a one-time payment of $38,794.24.3. The payment shall be received within 120 days of the date of the approval letter or the application will be denied.

4. This permit is not valid unless an Alteration of Terrain permit or other method of compliance with RSA 485-A:17 and Env-Wq

1500 is achieved.5. A certified wetlands scientist or qualified professional shall monitor the project during construction to verify that all work is

done in accordance with the approved plans and narratives, adequate siltation and erosion controls are properly implemented, and no

water quality violations occur.6. A post-construction report documenting the status of the bank stabilization and wetland mitigation area, including photographs

shall be submitted to the Wetlands Bureau within 60 days of the completion of construction. The Wetlands Bttreau may require

subsequent monitoring and corrective measures if DES deems the area inadequately stabilized or restored.

7. The bank stabilization plantings (live stakes) shall have at least 75% successful establishment after two (2) growing seasons, or

they shall be replanted and re-established in a maimer satisfactory to the DES Wetlands Program.

8. No machinery shall enter the water.9. No excavation shall be done in flowing water. No construction equipment shall be operated in flowing water.

10. Work within the stream, inclusive of work associated with installation of a cofferdam, shall be done during periods of low flow

only. The permittee shall monitor local weather forecasts to avoid working during or following precipitation events.

11. Cofferdams shall not be installed during periods of high flow, whether due to seasonal runoff or precipitation. Once the

cofferdam is fully effective, confined work can proceed without restriction.

12. Prior to commencing work on a substructure located within surface waters, the permittee or permittee’s contractors shall

construct a cofferdarn to isolate the substructure work area from the surface waters.

13. The temporary cofferdam shall be entirely removed within 2 days after work within the cofferdam is completed and water has

returned to normal clarity.14. Extreme precautions shall be taken within riparian areas to prevent unnecessary removal of vegetation during construction.

15. Precautions shall be taken to prevent import or transport of soil or seed stock containing nuisance or invasive species such as

Purple Loosestrife, Knotweed, or Phragmites. The contractor responsible for work shall appropriately address invasive species in

accordance with the NHDOT Best Management Practices for Roadside Invasive Plants (2008).

16. Appropriate siltationlerosionlturbidity controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction,

and remain in place until the area is stabilized. Silt fence(s) must be removed once the area is stabilized.

17. Within three days of final grading or temporary suspension of work, all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized by seeding and

mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growing season, by mulching with tack or netting and pinning on slopes

steeper than 3: 1.18. Construction equipment shall be inspected daily for leaking fuel, oil, and hydraulic fluid prior to entering surface waters or

wetlands or operating in an area where such fluids could reach groundwater, surface waters, or wetlands.

19. All refueling of equipment shall occur outside of surface waters or wetlands during construction. Machinery shall be staged and

refueled in upland areas only.20. faulty equipment shall be repaired immediately prior to entering areas that are subject to RSA 482-A jurisdiction.

21. The pennittee’s contractor shall maintain appropriate oil/diesel fuel spill kits on site that are readily accessible at all times during

construction, and shall train each operator in the use of the kits.

22. The contractor responsible for completion of the work shall use teclmiques described in the New Hampshire Stormwater Manual,

Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).

23. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA

483-B and N.H. Code Admin. Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.

24. Any further alteration of areas on this property that are subject to RSA 482-A jurisdiction will require a new application and

further permitting.

With Findings:I. This is a major project pursuant to Env-Wt 303.02 (c) Projects that involve alteration of nontidal wetlands, nontidal surface

DecisionReport 6 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

waters, and banks adjacent to nontidal surface waters in excess of 20,000 square feet in the aggregate.2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01.3. The proposed trail will provide a commuting and recreation route and increase safety. The proposed multi-use trail will providea direct connection to major activity centers in Lebanon by extending the Northern Rail Trail and connecting Lebanon to WestLebanon.4. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact toareas and environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03.5. The proposed project will occur along an old railroad bed. The applicant stated that most of the wetlands have been previouslyimpacted by the railroad bed and other adjacent development; and most of the wetland functions are provided at the lower level.6. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 302.04(b) Requirements for ApplicationEvaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.7. The NH Natural Heritage Bureau commented that ‘based on the results of your survey, it is not anticipated that the MascomaRiver Greenway project should impact rare plants.’8. The Lebanon Conservation Commission reviewed the proposed project and recommended approval with conditions.9. The proposed project will reestablish drainage ditches/wetlands on both sides of the new trail and restore the functionality of thedrainage ditch/wetlands that have filled with sediment. This is recognized as a self-mitigating measure at this location based oninformation provided by the agent for the applicant.10. The department has determined that this project is acceptable for a one-time payment of $38,794.24 as compensation for the8,809 sq.ft. of direct impacts.11. Department decision is issued in letter form and upon remittance of the full payment, the Department shall issue a posting permitin accordance with Env-Wt 803.08(f).12. In accordance with RSA 428-A:8, DES finds that the requirements for a public hearing do not apply as the permitted project isnot of substantial public interest, and will not have a significant impact on or adversely affect the values of the wetland resotirces, asidentified under RSA 482-A: 1.

2015-02637 NH DREDPORTSMOUTH Sagamore Creek

Requested Action:Retain temporary impact of 10,800 square feet of tidal wetlands in Portsmouth Prime Wetland 61A by placing timber mats to accessand replace one failing utility pole within the same general footprint. Emergency Authorization issued October 2, 2015.Compensatory mitigation consists of a one-time payment of$1,390.27 to the DES Aquatic Resource Mitigation (“ARIvI”) Fund.

************************************

APPROVE AFTER THE FACT:Retain temporary impact of 10,800 square feet of tidal wetlands in Portsmouth Prime Wetland 6lA by placing timber mats to accessand replace one failing utility pole within the same general footprint. Emergency Authorization issued October 2, 2015.Compensatory mitigation consists of a one-time payment of $1,390.27 to the DES Aquatic Resource Mitigation (“ARIVI”) Fund.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Tighe & Bond dated November 2015 as received by the NH Department ofEnvironmental Services (DES) on November 9, 2015.2. This approval is not valid until DES receives a one-time payment of$1,390.27 to the DES Aquatic Resource Mitigation (ARM)Fund. The applicant shall remit payment to DES. If DES does not receive payment within 120 days of the date of this approvalletter, DES will deny the application.3. The applicant shall retain a qualified professional to conduct an inspection and prepare a report of the site by November 1, 2016to determine if any impact to the elevation of the marsh or introduction of invasive species have occurred since project completion.The report shall be submitted to DES and the City of Portsmouth Conservation Commission by December 1, 2016,4. Restoration of temporary impact areas shall not be considered successful if sites are invaded by nuisance species such as

Decision Report 7 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

phragrnites during the first full growing season following the completion of construction. The permittee shall submit a rernediation

plan to DES and the City of Portsmouth Conservation Commission that proposes measures to be taken to eradicate nuisance species

during this same period.5. Any further alteration of areas on this property that are subject to RSA 482-A jurisdiction will reqtlire a new application and

further pennitting.

With Findings:1. This is a major project pursuant to Env-Wt 303.02(0, projects in or adjacent to designated prime wetlands.

2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01. The utility pole was failing and

needed to be replaced.3. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areas

and enviromnents under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03. The work is limited to temporary impact for access for

replacement of one pole within the same general footprint.4. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 302.04(b) Requirements for Application

Evaluation, has been considered in the design of the project, as well at the criteria for approval for projects in or adjacent to prime

wetlands pursuant to Env-Wt 703.01.5. Portsmouth Prime Wetlands 61A was designated with primary functions of the largest saltmarsh wetland in Portsmouth at 120

acres, rare plant species habitat, and critical fisheries habitat.6. The applicant has demonstrated that the project represents temporary disturbance for necessary repair and replacement of a public

utility electricity transmission pole, and that the project it will not affect the size of Prime Wetland 61A or any of its primary

functions.7. Pursuant to Env-Wt 302.03, the applicant has further mitigated for the impacts by making a payment to the Aquatic Resource

Mitigation(”ARM”) fund of Si ,390.27.8. The NH Heritage Bureau (“NHB”) has record of several natural communities and state-endangered plant species present in the

project vicinity. The applicant coordinated with NHB and N}13 does not expect impacts to the natural communities and

state-endangered plant species by the project.9. The Portsmouth Conservation Commission has reviewed, and recommends approval of the project, per statement received by

DES on November 17, 2015. The recommendation came with the stipulation that by the end of November 2016, an inspection of the

site be completed to determine if any impact to the elevation of the marsh or introduction of invasive species have occurred since

project completion.10. Based on findings #1-9 above, there is clear and convincing evidence this proposal will have no significant loss of values to the

prime wetlands as set forth in RSA 482-A: 1. and the project meets the criteria set forth in Rule Env-Wt 703.01 Criteria for Approval.

2015-02676 MAPLE AND UNION AVENUE ASSOCIATION LLC

LACONIA Lake Winnipesaukee

Requested Action:Reduce 9 finger piers within an existing 21 slip docking facility to be 3 ft. x 20 ft., repair a 4 ft. x 20 ft finger pier, a 4 ft. x 86 ft

walkway and a 4 ft. x 51 ft. walkway, drive 23 tie-off piles and two 3-piling ice clusters, and install 2 seasonal boatlifts on an average

of 176 feet of shoreline frontage along Paugus Bay, Lake Winnipesaukee, in Laconia.************************************

APPROVE PERMIT:Reduce 9 finger piers within an existing 21 slip docking facility to be 3 ft. x 20 ft., repair a 4 ft. x 20 ft finger pier, a 4 ft. x 86 ft

walkway and a 4 ft. x 51 ft. walkway, drive 23 tie-off piles and two 3-piling ice clusters, and install 2 seasonal boatlifts on an average

of 176 feet of shoreline frontage along Paugus Bay, Lake Winnipesaukee. in Laconia.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Folsom Design and Construction Management dated September 23, 2015, as

DecisionReport $ 02/16/2016for Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

received by DES on October 06, 2015.2. This permit is not valid and effective until it has been recorded with the appropriate county Registry of Deeds by the applicant.Prior to starting work under this permit, the permitted shall submit a copy of the recorded permit to the DES Wetlands Program bycertified mail, return receipt requested.3. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA483-B and N.H. Code of Administrative Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.4. Work authorized shall be carried out such that there are no discharges in or to spawning or nursery areas during spawningseasons. Impacts to such areas shall be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable during all other times of the year.5. Work shall be carried out in a time and manner to avoid disturbances to migratory waterfowl breeding and nesting areas.6. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction such that noturbidity escapes the immediate dredge area and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and water at the work site hasreturned to normal clarity.7. All construction-related debris shall be placed outside of the areas subject to RSA 482-A. Any spoil material deposited within250 feet of any surface water shall comply with RSA-483-B.8. Only those structures shown on the approved plans shall be installed or constructed along this frontage.9. This permit does not allow dredging for any purpose.10. The permittee may make repairs to the permitted structures as necessary, prior to the permit expiration date, provided that priorto performing any repair the permittee notifies the DES Wetlands Program and the Conservation Commission, in writing, of theproposed start and completion dates14. All seasonal structures, including watercraft lifts, shall be removed for the non-boating season.

With findings:1. This project is classified as a major project per Rule Env-Wt 303.02(j), modification ofa docking structure which provides morethan 5 slips.2. The applicant has an average of 176 feet of shoreline frontage along Lake Winnipesaukee.3. A maximum of 3 slips may be permitted on this frontage per Rule Env-Wt 402.13 Frontage Over 75’.4. The existing and proposed docking facility will provide 21 slips as defined per Rule Env-Wt 101.09 Boat slip, and does not meetRule Env-Wt 402.13.5. The proposed modifications do not add boat slips to the frontage.6. The proposed modification of the docking structure remove 154 sq. ft. of surface area of dock over public waters and is lessimpacting than repairing the structure “in kind”.7. The applicant requested, and the Department grants, a waiver of rule Env-Wt 402.21 requiring a reduction in boat slips for theproposed modification.

-Send to Governor and Executive Council-

2015-03029 HATEM, STEVEGILFORD Lake Winnipesaukee

Requested Action:Remove 244 sq. ft. of fill and reduce structure dimensions resulting in a 44 ft. straight breakwater beginning 6 ft. offshore with a 6ft. 9 in. x 39 ft. 8 in. cantilevered pier connected to a 6 ft. x 30 ft. piling pier by a 64 ft. 6 in. wharf, install a permanent boatlift, a 14ft. x 30 ft. seasonal canopy, and two personal watercraft lifts, and drive a 3-piling ice cluster on an average of 150 ft. of frontage onGovernor’s Island, Lake Winnipesaukee, in Gilford.************************************

Conservation CommissionlStaff Comments:11/09/2015 Per DHR, no historic properties affected.11/09/2015 Con. Corn. requests a statutory “hold” on the application until their next scheduled meeting. They may also considerconducting a site visit.11/20/15 Con. Corn. has reviewed this application, commented on the thoroughness, and voted to recommend approval as per plan

DecisionReport 9 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

and application.

APPROVE PERMIT:Remove 244 sq. ft. of fill and reduce structure dimensions resulting in a 44 ft. straight breakwater beginning 6 ft. offshore with a 6ft. 9 in. x 39 ft. 8 in. cantilevered pier connected to a 6 ft. x 30 ft. piling pier by a 64 ft. 6 in. wharf install a permanent boatlift, a 14ft. x 30 ft. seasonal canopy, and two personal watercraft lifts, and drive a 3-piling ice cluster on an average of 150 ft. of frontage onGovernors Island, Lake Winnipesaukee, in Gilford.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Watermark Marine Construction dated October 5, 2015, as received by the NT-IDepartment of Environmental Services (DES) on November 9. 2015 and cross sections dated January 5, 2016 as received by the NHDepartment of Environmental Services (DES) on January 7, 2019.2. This permit is not valid and effective until it has been recorded with the appropriate county Registry of Deeds by the applicant.Prior to starting work under this permit, the permitted shall submit a copy of the recorded permit to the DES Wetlands Program bycertified mail, return receipt requested.3. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA483-B and N.H. Code of Administrative Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.4. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and saplingpoint score below the minimum required per RSA 48 3-3:9, V, (a)(2)(D)(iv).5. Work authorized shall be carried out such that there are no discharges in or to spawning or nursery areas during spawningseasons. Impacts to such areas shall be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable during all other times of the year.6. Work shall be carried out in a time and manner to avoid disturbances to migratory waterfowl breeding and nesting areas.7. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction such that noturbidity escapes the immediate dredge area and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and water at the work site hasreturned to normal clarity.8. All removed fill and construction-related debris shall be placed outside of the areas subject to RSA 482-A. Any spoil materialdeposited within 250 feet of any surface water shall comply with RSA-483-B.9. Any subdivision of the property will require removal of a sufficient portion of the docking structures to comply with the dock sizeand density requirements in effect at the time of the subdivision.10. Only those structures shown on the approved plans shall be installed or constructed along this frontage. All portions of thestructures, including the breakwater toe of slope, shall be at least 20 ft. from the abutting property lines or the imaginary extension ofthose lines into the water.11. Pilings shall be spaced a minimum of 12 ft. apart as measured piling center to piling center.12. All seasonal structures, including watercraft lifts, shall be removed for the non-boating season.13. The canopy, including the support frame and cover, shall be designed and constructed to be readily removed at the end of theboating season and the flexible canopy shall be removed for the non-boating season.14. No portion of breakwater as measured at normal full lake (Elev. 504.32) shall extend more than 50 feet from normal full lakeshoreline.15. The repairs shall maintain the size, location, and configuration of the pre-existing structures.16. This permit does not allow dredging for any purpose.

With Findings:1. This project is classified as a major project per Rule Env-Wt 303.02(j),modification of a breakwater.2. The construction of a breakwater to provide safe docking at this site is justified in accordance with Rule Env-Wt 402.06,Breakwaters.3. The applicant has an average of 150 ft. of shoreline frontage along Lake Wiimipesaukee.4. A maximum of 3 slips may be permitted on this frontage per Rule Env-Wt 402.13 Frontage Over 75’.5. The proposed docking facility will provide 3 slips as defined per Rule Env-Wt 101.09 Boat slip, and therefore meets RuleEnv-Wt 402.13.6. Public hearing is waived with the finding that the project impacts will not significantly impair the resources of LakeWinnipesaukee.

Decision Report 10 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

-Send to Governor and Executive Council-

2015-03143 LITTLETON, TOWN OF

LITTLETON Ammonoosuc River

Requested Action:Dredge and fill 8,208 square feet, 115 linear feet, of the bed and banks of the Ammonoosuc River to construct a new multi-modal

bridge using the existing concrete abutments on Bridge Street. Work in jurisdiction includes scour protection for the northern

abutment and 4,066 square feet of temporary impacts.************************************

APPROVE PERMIT:Dredge and fill 8,208 square feet, 115 linear feet, of the bed and banks of the Ammonoosuc River to construct a new multi-modal

bridge using the existing concrete abutments on Bridge Street. Work in jurisdiction includes scour protection for the northern

abutment and 4,066 square feet of temporary impacts.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by HEB Engineers, Inc. dated 02/03/2016 (sheet V 1.11 and C 1.11) as received by

DES on February 04, 2016; and revised plans by HEB Engineers, Inc. (sheet C 1.21) as received by DES on February 08, 2016.

2. Work shall be done during annual low flow conditions and during the months of May through September. No in-stream work

shall occur after October 1 unless a waiver of this condition is issued in writing by DES in consultation with NH Fish & Game.

3. A qualified professional shall monitor the project during construction to verify that all work is done in accordance with the

approved plans and narratives, adequate siltation and erosion controls are properly implemented, and no water quality violations

occur.4. Area of temporary impact shall be regraded to original contours following completion of work.

5. Appropriate siltation and erosion controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction, and

shall remain until the area is stabilized. Temporary controls shall be removed once the area has been stabilized.

6. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction such that no

turbidity escapes the immediate dredge area and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and water at the work site has

returned to normal clarity.7. No excavation shall be done in flowing water. No construction equipment shall be operated in flowing water.

8. Appropriate siltation and erosion controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction, and

shall remain until the area is stabilized. Temporary controls shall be removed once the area has been stabilized.

9. Extreme precautions shall be taken within riparian areas to prevent unnecessary removal of vegetation during construction.

Areas cleared of vegetation must be revegetated with like native species within three days of the completion of the disturbance.

10. Within three days of final grading or temporary suspension of work in an area that is in or adjacent to wetlands or surface waters,

all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized by seeding and mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growing season, by

mulching with tackiflers on slopes less than 3:1 or netting and pinning on slopes steeper than 3:1.

11. Where construction activities occur between November 30 and May 1, all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized within I day of

establishing the grade that is final or that otherwise will exist for more than 5 days.

12. Precautions shall be taken to prevent import or transport of soil or seed stock containing nuisance or invasive species such as

Purple Loosestrife, Knotweed, or Phragmites. The contractor responsible for work shall appropriately address invasive species in

accordance with the NHDOT Best Management Practices for Roadside Invasive Plants (2008).

13. Construction equipment shall be inspected daily for leaking fuel, oil, and hydraulic fluid prior to entering surface waters or

wetlands or operating in an area where such fluids could reach groundwater, surface waters, or wetlands.

14. The permittee’s contractor shall maintain appropriate oil/diesel fuel spill kits on site that are readily accessible at all times during

construction, and shall train each operator in the use of the kits.

15. All refueling of equipment shall occur outside of surface waters or wetlands during construction. Machinery shall be staged and

refueled in upland areas only.16. The contractor responsible for completion of the work shall use techniques described in the New Hampshire Stormwater Manual,

Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).

DecisionReport 11 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

17. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA483-B and N.H. Code Admin. Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.18. Any further alteration of areas on this property that are subject to RSA 482-A jurisdiction will require a new application andfurther permitting.

With Findings:1. This is a major project per NH Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.02 (p) Any project that includes a new or replacement streamcrossing which meets the criteria for a tier 3 stream crossing as specified in Env-Wt 904.04(a).2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Rule Env-Wt 302.01.3. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact toareas and environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Rule Env-Wt 302.03.4. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Rule Env-Wt 302.04 Requirements forApplication Evaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.5. An old steel truss bridge was removed over 30 years ago. The abutments were left in place. The proposed project will use theexisting abutments.6. The design meets the criteria for a Tier 3 Stream crossing (Env-Wt 904.05) to the extent practicable.7. It is not practicable to move the existing northern abutment further from the river.8. The proposed bridge will pass 100 year storm event and will not significantly alter the flow velocities of the river in the area ofthe bridge.9. The applicant has permanent easements from owners of Littleton tax map 77 lot 80 and 82 and temporary construction easementsfrom owners of Littleton tax map 77 lot 89 and Littleton tax map 78 lot 28410. In a letter dated December 08, 2015 the Ammonoosuc River Local Advisory Committee stated they are supportive of Littleton’sMulti-Modal Bridge project.11. The Conservation Commission signed the application waiving their right to intervene pursuant to RSA 482-A: 11.12. No comments were submitted from the NHFG Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program or the Natural Heritage Bureau.13. In accordance with RSA 482-A:8, DES finds that the requirements for a public hearing do not apply as the permitted project isnot of substantial public interest, and will not have a significant impact on or adversely affect the values of the riverine resources, asidentified under RSA 482-A: 1.

MINOR IMPACT PROJECT

* **** **** * ********* *************** **** **** *** ******

2015-02044 GOULD, RICHARDBETHLEHEM Unnamed Wetland

Requested Action:Dredge and fill 5,360 square feet of wetlands and an intermittent stream for the construction of an access road and wildlife pond fora 22 lot residential subdivision.* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Conservation Commission/Staff Comments:8/6/15 Per DHR, No Historic Properties Affected

APPROVE PERMIT:Dredge and fill 5,360 square feet of wetlands and an intermittent stream for the construction of an access road and wildlife pond fora 22 lot residential subdivision.

DecisionReport 12 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

With Conditions:1. All work shall be done in accordance with the plan by McCourt Engineering Associates, PLLC entitled Residential SubdivisionPlan: Ledgewood 2 as received by DES on January 21, 2016.2. This permit is contingent on approval by the DES Alteration of Terrain Bureau.3. A qualified professional shall monitor the project during construction to assure it is constructed in accordance with the approved

plans and to assure no water quality violations occur.4. There shall be no further alteration of wetlands for lot development, driveways, culverts. or for septic setback.5. The deed which accompanies the sales transaction for each of the lots in this subdivision shall contain condition #4 of thisapproval.6. This permit shall not be effective until it has been recorded with the Registry of Deeds Office by the Pennittee. A copy of the

recorded permit shall be submitted to the DES Wetlands Bureau.7. Work shall be done during non-flow or in the dry.8. Appropriate siltation and erosion controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction, and

shall remain until the area is stabilized. Temporary controls shall be removed once the area has been stabilized.9. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction such that noturbidity escapes the immediate dredge area, and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and water at the work site hasreturned to normal clarity.10. All dredged and excavated material and construction-related debris shall be placed outside of the areas subject to RSA 482-A.

11. Construction equipment shall be inspected daily for leaking fuel, oil, and hydraulic fluid prior to entering surface waters or

wetlands or operating in an area where such fluids could reach groundwater, surface waters, or wetlands.12. The permittee’s contractor shall maintain appropriate oil/diesel fuel spill kits on site that are readily accessible at all times during

construction, and shall train each operator in the use of the kits.13. All refueling of equipment shall occur outside of surface waters or wetlands during construction. Machinery shall be staged and

refueled in upland areas only.14. faulty equipment shall be repaired immediately prior to entering areas that are subject to RSA 482-A jurisdiction.15. Within three days of final grading or temporary suspension of work in an area that is in or adjacent to wetlands or surface waters,

all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized by seeding and mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growing season, bymulching with tackifiers on slopes less than 3:1 or netting and pinning on slopes steeper than 3:1.16. Where construction activities occur between November 30 and May 1, all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized within 1 day of

establishing the grade that is final or that otherwise will exist for more than 5 days. Stabilization shall include placing 3-inches ofbase course gravels, or loaming and mulching with tack or netting and pinning on slopes steeper than 3:1.17. Proper headwalls shall be constructed within seven days of culvert installation.18. The contractor responsible for completion of the work shall use techniques described in the New Hampshire Stormwater Manual,Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).19. Any further alteration of areas on this property that are subject to RSA 482-A jurisdiction will require a new application and

further permitting.

With findings:1. This is a Minor Project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.03 (h) Projects involving less than 20,000 square feet of alterationin the aggregate in nontidal wetlands, nontidal surface waters, or banks adjacent to nontidal surface waters which exceed the criteriaof Env-Wt 303.04(f).2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Rule Env-Wt 302.01.3. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to

areas and environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Rule Env-Wt 302.03.4. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Rule Env-Wt 302.04 Requirements forApplication Evaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.5. The proposed intermittent stream crossing is sized to acconmodate the 50 year flood frequency. 6. The property is 815.6acres. The applicant proposes a 22 Lot subdivision (19 residential; 3 open space) with 141 acres in an existing conservation

easement and residential lots ranging from 26-68 acres.7. four vernal pools were identified on the site. None of the vernal pools will be directly impacted by the proposed development.

The area surrounding the vernal pools is to remain vegetated. A 50 foot no cut buffer around vernal pool 2 will be maintained and is

shown on the subdivision plans. 8.No comments were submitted from the N1-IFG Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program or

DecisionReport 13 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

the Natural Heritage Bureau.9. Each lot is designed to acconmodate a 3,000 square foot impervious foot print that includes house and driveway, not impactingwetlands.10. The majority of the 60 year old logging roads will be converted to non-motorized paths. The applicant has certified that theexisting ioop roadway is considered grandfathered pursuant to Env-Wt 101.47.11. The applicant has provided a waiver request per Env-Wt 204.03, to waive the delineation of wetland boundaries on the entireproperty as required per Env-Wt 304.09 (a).12. The applicant has had a Certified Wetland Scientist field delineate the area of the proposed development. The applicant hasprovided approximate boundaries of other wetlands based on a 2003 map of wetlands and NRCS soil mapping.13. It would be an economic hardship for the owner to have the entire 815 acre lot delineated in the field.14. There will be no adverse effect to the environment or natural resources of the state, public health, or public safety; or on abuttingproperties that is more significant than that which would result from complying with the Env-Wt 304.09 (a).15. The waiver is granted in accordance with Env-Wt 204.04(b), as strict compliance with the rule will provide no benefit to thepublic and will cause an operational or economic hardship to the applicant.16. In a letter dated October 26, 2015 the Bethlehem Conservation Commission stated” We want to take this opportunity to expressour concerns about future wetland impacts on individual lots.” 17. In a letter dated December 04, 2015 the applicant provided aresponse to the Conservation Conijnission. Included in the response was a statement indicating that no further impacts are proposedfor development of the lots.18. In a letter dated January 19, 2016 a certified wetland scientist stated “I am confirming that each lot within the proposedLedgewood Subdivision is designed to accommodate a 3,000 square foot impervious footprint that includes houses and drivewayswith no additional wetland impact.19. No additional conments were submitted by the Conservation Commission.

2015-02739 NOREEN, ELLENGILFORD Lake Winnipesatikee

Requested Action:Repair 20 linear ft. of retaining wall, replant 384 sq. of bank with native species, drive two 3-pilng ice clusters, and remove 14.5 sq.ft. of dock surface resulting in docking structures described as follows: Au existing 44 ft. breakwater beginning 6 ft. off the shorelineadjacent to a 6 ft. 6 in. x 47 ft. piling pier connected to a 7 ft. x 47 ft. piling pier by a 12 ft. x 15 ft. walkway in a “U” configuration,with a permanent boatlift in the center slip on an average of 155 ft. of frontage on Governors Island, Lake Winnipesaukee. inGilford.

Conservation Commission’Staff Comments:10-20-15- No potential to cause effect per DHR.

APPROVE PERMIT:Repair 20 linear ft. of retaining wall, replant 384 sq. of bank with native species, drive two 3-pilng ice clusters, and remove 14.5 sq.ft. of dock surface resulting in docking structures described as follows: An existing 44 ft. break-water beginning 6 ft. off the shorelineadjacent to a 6 ft. 6 in. x 47 ft. piling pier connected to a 7 ft. x 47 ft. piling pier by a 12 ft. x 15 ft. walkway in a “U” configuration,with a permanent boatlift in the center slip on an average of 155 ft. of frontage on Governor’s Island, Lake Winnipesaukee. inGilford.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Watermark Marine Construction dated September 8, 2010, and revised throughJanuary, 12, 2016, as received by DES on January 14, 2016.2. This permit is not valid and effective until it has been recorded with the appropriate county Registry of Deeds by the applicant.Prior to starting work under this permit, the permitted shall submit a copy of the recorded permit to the DES Wetlands Program bycertified mail, return receipt requested.3. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA

DecisionReport 14 02/16/2016for Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

483-3 and N.H. Code of Administrative Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.4. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and saplingpoint score below the minimum required per RSA 483-3:9, V, (a)(2)(D)(iv).5. Revegetation of the 384 sq. ft. of bank with native species shall have at least 75% successful establishment of the nativevegetation after two (2) growing seasons, or they shall be replanted and re-established until a functional buffer is replicated.6. Restoration of the 384 sq. ft. of bank shall not be considered successful if it invaded by nuisance or invasive species during thefirst full growing season following the completion of construction.7. failure to complete the revegetation of 384 sq. ft. of bank area in accordance with plans received by DES on January 14, 2016constitutes a violation of RSA 482-A and RSA 483-B.8. Work authorized shall be carried out such that there are no discharges in or to spawning or nursery areas during spawningseasons. Impacts to such areas shall be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable during all other times of the year.9. Work shall be carried out in a time and manner to avoid disturbances to migratory waterfowl breeding and nesting areas.10. Appropriate siltation and erosion controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction, andshall remain until the area is stabilized. Temporary controls shall be removed once the area has been stabilized.11. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction such that noturbidity escapes the immediate dredge area and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and water at the work site hasreturned to normal clarity.12. All construction-related debris shall be placed outside of the areas subject to RSA 482-A. 13. The contractor responsible forcompletion of the work shall use techniques described in the New Hampshire Stormwater Manual, Volume 3, Erosion and SedimentControls During Construction (December 2008).14. Only those structures shown on the approved plans shall be installed or constructed along this frontage. All portions of thestructures, including the breakwater toe of slope, shall be at least 20 ft. from the abutting property lines or the imaginary extension ofthose lines into the water.15. Only existing rocks that have fallen from the structure(s) shall be used for the repairs. No additional rocks shall be used, whetherobtained from the site or brought to the site.16. The repairs shall maintain the size, location, and configuration of the pre-existing structures.17. This permit does not allow dredging for any purpose.18. No person undertaking any activity shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause or contribute to, any violations ofthe surface water quality standards in RSA 485-A and Env-Wq 1700.19. This permit shall not preclude DES from initiating appropriate action if DES later determines that any of the structures depictedas “existing” on the plans submitted by or on behalf of the permitted were not previously permitted or grandfathered.20. Within tlwee days of final grading or temporary suspension of work in an area that is in or adjacent to wetlands or surfacewaters, all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized by seeding and mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growingseason, by mulching with tackifiers on slopes less than 3:1 or netting and pinning on slopes steeper than 3:1.

With Findings:1. This is a minor impact project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.03(m), addition of pilings that does not result in the additionof boat slips.2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01.3. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areasand environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03.4. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 3 02.04(a) Requirements for ApplicationEvaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.

2016-00031 LARRY LONGWORTH REV TRUSTALTON Lake Winnipesaukee

Requested Action:Permanently remove an existing 10 ft. x 26 ft. permanent dock, install a 6 ft. x 26 ft. crib pier to extend from an 18 ft. x 6 ft. wharf inan “L” configuration on an average of 95 feet of shoreline frontage along Lake Wimiipesaukee, in Alton.************************************

DecisionReport 15 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

Conservation Commission/Staff Comments:01/07/2016 Con Corn requests that action be suspended for 40 days or until receiving a written report from them, following a siteinvestigation.01/12/16 letter to Larry Longworth returned by USPSwithupdated address.1/25/16 Con. Corn. has no objections.

APPROVE PERMIT:Permanently remove an existing 10 ft. x 26 ft. permanent dock, install a 6 ft. x 26 ft. crib pier to extend from an 18 ft. x 6 ft. wharf inan “U configuration on an average of 95 feet of shoreline frontage along lake Winnipesaukee, in Alton.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Advantage NH lakes dated December 3, 2015, as received by DES on January 5,2016.2. This permit is not valid and effective until it has been recorded with the appropriate county Registry of Deeds by the applicant.Prior to starting work under this permit, the permitted shall submit a copy of the recorded permit to the DES Wetlands Program bycertified mail, return receipt requested.3. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA483-B and N.H. Code of Administrative Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.4. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and saplingpoint score below the minimum required per RSA 483-B:9, V, (a)(2)(D)(iv).5. Work authorized shall be carried out such that there are no discharges in or to spawning or nursery areas during spawningseasons. Impacts to such areas shall be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable during all other times of the year.6. Work shall be carried out in a time and manner to avoid disturbances to migratory waterfowl breeding and nesting areas.7. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction such that noturbidity escapes the immediate dredge area and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and water at the work site hasreturned to normal clarity.8. All construction-related debris shall be placed outside of the areas subject to RSA 482-A . 9. Only those structures shown on theapproved plans shall be installed or constructed along this frontage.10. Cribs shall not exceed 6 ft. long x 5 ft. wide, and shall be of sufficient height to support the docking structure above normal frilllake level (Elev. 504.32).11. Crib material shall be timber, concrete, or other non-toxic material, and of such size and spacing as necessary to completelycontain the ballast.12. The minimum clear spacing between cribs shall be 12 feet.13. No portion of the pier shall extend more than 23 ft. from the shoreline at full lake elevation (Elev. 504.32).

With Findings:1. This is a minor impact project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.03(d), construction of a permanent, single slip, dockingstructure.2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01.3. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areasand environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03.4. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 302.04(a) Requirements for ApplicationEvaluation. has been considered in the design of the project.5. The applicant has an average of 95 feet of shoreline frontage along Lake Winnipesaukee.6. A maximum of 2 slips may be permitted on this frontage per Rule Env-Wt 402.13, frontage Over 75’.7. The proposed docking facility will provide 1 slip as defined per RSA 482-A:2, VIII and therefore meets Rule Env-Wt 402.13.

8. The proposed site is located in an area which would qualify for a breakwater pursuant to Env-Wt 402.07. The proposedpermanent dock is less impacting than a breakwater.

Decision Report 16 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

2016-00046 LAMBERT, DANIEL/LUCYWOLFEBORO Crescent Lake

Requested Action:Impact 1,239 sq. ft. of banjc along 45 linear ft. of shoreline to construct a 707 sq. ft. perched beach on an average of 159 ft. offrontage along Crescent Lake, in Wolfeboro.

APPROVE PERMIT:Impact 1,239 sq. ft. of bank along 45 linear ft. of shoreline to construct a 707 sq. ft. perched beach on an average of 159 ft. offrontage along Crescent Lake, in Wolfeboro.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by White Mountain Survey and Engineering dated January 4, 2016, as received byDES on January 8, 2016.2. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA483-B and N.H. Code of Administrative Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.3. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and saplingpoint score below the minimum required per RSA 483-B:9, V, (a)(2)(D)(iv).4. Work authorized shall be carried out such that there are no discharges in or to spawning or nursery areas during spawningseasons. Impacts to such areas shall be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable during all other times of the year.5. Work shall be carried out in a time and manner to avoid disturbances to migratory waterfowl breeding and nesting areas.6. Appropriate siltation and erosion controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction, andshall remain until the area is stabilized. Temporary controls shall be removed once the area has been stabilized.7. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction such that noturbidity escapes the immediate dredge area and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and water at the work site hasreturned to normal clarity.8. All excavated material and construction-related debris shall be placed outside of the areas subject to RSA 482-A. Any spoilmaterial deposited within 250 feet of any surface water shall comply with RSA-483-B.9. The contractor responsible for completion of the work shall use techniques described in the New Hampshire Stonriwater Manual,Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).10. Stone placed along the beach front for the purpose of retaining sand shall be placed above and landward of those rocks currentlylocated along the normal high water line (Elevation 534.2). The rocks existing at the normal high water line shall remainundisturbed such that the natural shoreline remains visible and intact.11. No more than 13 cu. yd. of sand shall be used and all sand shall be located above the normal high water line.12. The penriittee shall provide appropriate diversion of surface water runoff to prevent erosion of beach area.13. Within three days of final grading or temporary suspension of work in an area that is in or adjacent to wetlands or surfacewaters, all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized by seeding and mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growingseason, by mulching with tackifiers on slopes less than 3:1 or netting and pinning on slopes steeper than 3:1.14. A combination of trees, shrubs and ground covers representing the density and species diversity of the vegetation present priorto construction shall be replanted beginning at a distance no greater than 5 feet landward from the beach area.

With Findings:1. This is a minor impact project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.03(f), construction of a beach that does not exceed minimumimpact criteria other than to propose to use more than 10 cubic yards of sand.2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01.3. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areasand environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03.

2016-00143 KEEFE, JOHNMEREDITH Lake Winnipesaukee

DecisionReport 17 02/16/2016for Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

Requested Action:Rmove an existing 6 ft. x 30 ft. crib pier and install two 6 ft. x 40 ft. seasonal piers connected by a 6 ft. x 12 ft. seasonal walkway ina “U” configuration anchored to a steel beam attached to existing rocks on an average of 150 feet of shoreline frontage on BearIsland, in Lake Winnipesaukee, in Meredith.************************************

Conservation Commission/Staff Comments:1/22/16 - No historic properties affected per DHR.

APPROVE PERMIT:Rnìove an existing 6 ft. x 30 ft. crib pier and install two 6 ft. x 40 ft. seasonal piers connected by a 6 ft. x 12 ft. seasonal walkway ina ‘U’ configuration anchored to a steel beam attached to existing rocks on an average of 150 feet of shoreline frontage on BearIsland, in Lake Wiimipesaukee, in Meredith.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Don Carey dated December 31, 2015, as received by DES on January 13, 2016.2. This permit is not valid and effective until it has been recorded with the appropriate county Registry of Deeds by the applicant.Prior to starting work under this permit, the permitted shall submit a copy of the recorded permit to the DES Wetlands Program bycertified mail, return receipt requested.3. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA483-B and N.H. Code of Administrative Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.4. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and saplingpoint score below the minimum required per RSA 483-B:9, V, (a)(2)(D)(iv).5. Work authorized shall be carried out such that there are no discharges in or to spawning or nursery areas during spawningseasons. Impacts to such areas shall be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable during all other times of the year.6. Work shall be carried out in a time and manner to avoid disturbances to migratory waterfowl breeding and nesting areas.7. All construction-related debris shall be placed outside of the areas subject to RSA 482-A. 8. Any subdivision of the propertywill require removal of a sufficient portion of the docking structures to comply with the dock size and density requirements in effectat the time of the subdivision.9 Only those structures shown on the approved plans shall be installed or constructed along this frontage. All portions of thestructures shall be at least 20 ft. from the abutting property lines or the imaginary extension of those lines into the water.10. No portion of the piers shall extend more than 40 feet from the shoreline at full lake elevation (Elev. 504.32).11. All seasonal structures shall be removed for the non-boating season.

With Findings:1. This is a minor impact project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.03(d), construction of a docking system providing 3 slips.2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01.3. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areasand environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03.4. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 302.04(a) Requirements for ApplicationEvaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.5. The applicant has an average of 150 feet of shoreline frontage along Lake Winnipesaukee.6. A maximum of 3 slips may be permitted on this frontage per Rule Env-Wt 402.13, Frontage Over 75’.7. The proposed docking facility will provide 3 slips as defined per RSA 482-A:2, VIII and therefore meets Rule Env-Wt 402.13.

MINIMUM IMPACT PROJECT

***************************************************

DecisionReport 18 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

2010-03365 LORDEN, THOMASSEABROOK Tidal Buffer Zone

Requested Action:Impact a total of 2,312 square feet within the previously disturbed 100-foot tidal buffer zone to include the construction of a 24-foot

x 52-foot replacement dwelling, stairs, gravel driveway, and 135 square feet of temporary impact associated with the connection of

the water and sewer lines on a single-family residential lot.

Conservation Commission/Staff Comments:The Seabrook Conservation Commission did not comment on the application.

APPROVE AMENDMENT:Impact a total of 2,312 square feet within the previously disturbed 100-foot tidal buffer zone to include the construction of a 24-foot

x 52-foot replacement dwelling, stairs, gravel driveway, and 135 square feet of temporary impact associated with the connection of

the water and sewer lines on a single-family residential lot.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans received by the NH Department of Environmental Services (DES) on December 14,

2015.2. Any future work on this property that is within the jurisdiction of the DES Wetlands Bureau as specified in RSA 482-A will

require a new application and approval by the Bureau.3. DES Southeast Region Staff shall be notified in writing prior to commencement of work and upon its completion.

4. All activities shall be in accordance with the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act, RSA 483-B. 5. Appropriate

siltation/erosion/turbidity controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction, and remain in

place until the area is stabilized. Silt fence(s) must be removed once the area is stabilized.

6. This approval does not provide the authorization to install fencing on the property.7. Within three days of final grading or temporary suspension of work, all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized by seeding and

mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growing season, by mulching with tack or netting and pinning on slopes

steeper than 3:1.

With Findings:1. This is a minimum impact project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.04(b) Projects in previously-developed upland areas

within 100 feet of the highest observable tide lineunless they are major or minor as defined in Env-Wt 303.02 or Env-Wt 303.03.2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01. 3. The applicant has provided

evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areas and environments under the

department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03.4. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 302.04(b) Requirements for Application

Evaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.5. A memo dated 8/16/10 (the “Memo”) from the NH Natural Heritage Bureau (“NHB”) identified ten (10) exemplary natural

communities and eleven (11) state-listed plant species in the vicinity of the proposed project.

6. DES finds that the aforementioned communities and plant species identified in the NHB Memo will not be adversely affect by the

project as the dwelling is within the previously developed 100-foot tidal buffer zone.7. This permit transfer is issued in accordance with NH Administrative Rule Env-Wt 502.02 (b).

8.The owner, authorized agent or applicant certifies that this permit qualifies for a permit extension in accordance with RSA

4$2-A:3, XIV-a, and Env-Wt 502.01.9.This permit has been extended in accordance with RSA 482-A:3, XIV-a and Env-Wt 502.01.

DecisionReport 19 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

2013-00837 Nfl DEPT Of TRANSPORTATIONWALPOLE

Requested Action:Amend Permit to change the proposed 8 ft. x 6 ft. box culvert embedded 1 ft. to a 8 ft. x5 ft. open bottom arch culvert.************************************

Conservation Commission/Staff Comments:Cons. Comm. - no comment

APPROVE AMENDMENT:Replace twin 36 in. culverts with an 8 ft. x 5 ft. open bottom arch structure impacting 2,298 sq. ft. (660 sq. ft. temporary) of riverinewetlands. NHDOT project 25781

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by NHDOT Maintenance District 4 as received by the Department on January 15,2016.2. Prior to construction a scaled plan for the crossing must be stamped by a Professional Engineer and submitted to the file.3. Prior to construction the applicant shall provide specification for the stream bed materials that will be used to create the channelwithin the structure.4. Work shall be done during low flow.5. Extreme precautions to be taken within riparian areas to limit unnecessary removal of vegetation during road construction andareas cleared of vegetation to be revegetated as quickly as possible.6. Appropriate siltation/erosion/turbidity controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction,and shall remain until the area is stabilized.7. Construction equipment shall not be located within surface waters.8. Any dredged material shall be placed out of the DES Wetlands Bureau jurisdiction.9. Discharge from dewatering of work areas shall be to sediment basins that are: a) located in uplands; b) lined with hay bales orother acceptable sediment trapping liners; and c) set back as far as possible from wetlands and surface waters, in all cases with aminimum of 20 feet of undisturbed vegetated buffer.10. Within three days of the last activity in an area, all exposed soil areas, where construction activities are complete, shall bestabilized by seeding and mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growing season, by mulching with tack on slopessteeper than 3:1 or netting /matting and pinning on slopes steeper than 2:1.11. Where construction activities have been temporarily suspended within the growing season, all exposed soil areas shall bestabilized within 14 days by seeding and mulching or if temporarily suspended outside the growing season, all exposed areas shall bestabilized within 14 days by mulching, mulching with tack on slopes steeper than 3:1 and stabilized by matting and pinning on slopessteeper than 2:1.12. The contractor responsible for completion of the work shall utilize techniques described in the New Hampshire StonnwaterManual, Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).13. There shall be no further alteration to wetlands or surface waters without amendment of this permit.

With Findings:1. This is a minimum impact project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 904.07(c), as it meets the general criteria under Env-Wt904.01, will not diminish the hydraulic capacity or the capacity to accommodate aquatic life passage.2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01.3. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areasand environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03.4. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 3 02.04(a) Requirements for ApplicationEvaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.5. The proposed amendment is not considered significant and does allow for an open bottom structure where currently there is notone.

DecisionReport 20 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

2015-01557 RUMNEY, TOWN OfRUMNEY Unnamed Stream

Requested Action:Proposal to revise the projects impact area so that all work will occur within the Towns Right-of-Way. The total impact arearemains 1,087 square feet, the proposed permanent impact area increased to 529 square feet, and the proposed temporary impactsdecreased to 558 square feet.

APPROVE AMEN1MENT:Dredge and fill 1,087 square feet of an umiamed perennial stream to replace an existing 10 foot span concrete pipe arch culver with12 foot span pre-cast concrete rigid frame bridge with a natural stream bottom. Work in jurisdiction includes 558 square feet of

temporary impacts.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by HEB Engineers, Inc. entitled Preliminary Design Drawings of the Buffalo Road

Bridge #128/073 over Unnamed Brook as received by the Department on January 19, 2016.2. A qualified professional shall monitor the project during construction to assure it is constructed in accordance with the approved

plans and narratives and to assure no water quality violations occur.3. Materials used to emulate a natural stream channel bottom must be rounded and smooth stones similar to the natural streamsubstrate and shall not include angular rip-rap.4. Construction in cold water fishery streams shall not occur between October 1 and May 1 to minimize impacts to the fisheryunless a waiver of this condition is issued by the DES Wetlands Bureau in consultation with the NH Department of Fish and Game.

5. Extreme precautions shall be taken within riparian areas to limit unnecessary removal of vegetation during construction.6. No equipment shall enter the water.7. Work within the stream, inclusive of work associated with installation of a cofferdam, shall be done during periods of low flow.

High flows can be caused by seasonal runoff or precipitation; the permittee shall monitor local forecasts to review weatherconditions.8. Work shall be conducted in a manner so as to minimize turbidity and sedimentation.9. Appropriate siltation/erosion controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction, and remainin place until the area is stabilized.10. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to constmction, shall be maintained during construction such that no

turbidity escapes the immediate dredge area, and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and the water at the work site

has returned to normal clarity.11. Prior to commencing work on a substructure located within surface waters, a cofferdam shall be constructed to isolate the

substructure work area from the surface waters.12. Discharge from dewatering of work areas shall be to sediment basins that are: a) located in uplands; b) lined with hay bales or

other acceptable sediment trapping liners; c) set back as far as possible from wetlands and surface waters, in all cases with a

minimum of 20 feet of undisturbed vegetated buffer.13. No work within the confined area shall proceed until the cofferdam is fully effective, and water flow is controlled.

14. Temporary cofferdams shall be entirely removed immediately following construction.15. Dredged material shall be placed outside of the jurisdiction of the DES Wetlands Bureau.16. Construction equipment shall be inspected daily for leaking fuel, oil and hydraulic fluid prior to entering surface waters orwetlands. Faulty equipment shall be repaired prior to entering jurisdictional areas.17. The contractor shall have appropriate oil spill kits on site and readily accessible at all times during construction and each

operator shall be trained in its use.18. All refueling of equipment shall occur outside of surface waters or wetlands during construction.19. The contractor responsible for completion of the work shall utilize techniques described in the New Hampshire Stonrnvater

Manual, Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).20. Areas of temporary impact shall be restored to original conditions following the completion of work.

21. Within three days of final grading or temporary suspension of work in an area that is in or adjacent to wetlands or surface waters,

all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized by seeding and mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growing season, by

DecisionReport 21 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

mulching with tack or netting and pinning on slopes steeper than 3:1.22. Within three days of final grading in an area that is in or adjacent to wetlands or surface waters, all exposed soil areas shall bestabilized by seeding and mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growing season, by mulching with tack or nettingand pinning on slopes steeper than 3:1.23. Where construction activities have been temporarily suspended within the growing season, all exposed soil areas shall bestabilized within 14 days by seeding and mulching.24. Where construction activities have been temporarily suspended outside the growing season, all exposed areas shall be stabilizedwithin 14 days by mulching and tack. Slopes steeper than 3:1 shall be stabilized by matting and pinning.25. Any future work on this property that is within the jurisdiction of the DES Wetlands Bureau as specified in RSA 482-A willrequire a new application and approval by the Bureau.

With Findings:DES reaffirms findings 1 through 10 with additional findings:1. This is a minimum impact project per NH Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.04 (x) Maintenance, repair, or replacement of anondocking structure such as a culvert, headwall, bridge, dam, residential utility line, or rip-rap slope of less than 50 linear feet.2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Rule Env-Wt 302.01.3. The proposed bridge replacement is necessary because the bridge is structurally deficient. A 2013 bridge inspection byNHDOT placed the bridge is on the Municipal Red List.4. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact toareas and environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Rule Env-Wt 302.03.5. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Rule Env-Wt 302.04 Requirements forApplication Evaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.6. The stream crossing has a contributing watershed less than 640 acres and is classified as Tier 2 (Env-Wt 904.03).7. The proposed bridge is designed to pass the 50-year storm event with 1 foot of freeboard.8. The proposed replacement stream crossing meets the criteria of Env-Wt 904.07 for the replacement of a Tier One or Tier 2stream crossing.9. The proposed bridge will be an improvement over the existing structure because of the larger hydraulic capacity and naturalstream bottom.10. No comments were submitted from the NHFG Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program or the Natural Heritage Bureau.11. On January 19, 2016 DES received a proposed amendment request.12. The amendment is requested because the original application submission had accidentally included impacts outside of the Townsright-of-way. In order to keep all impacts inside the right-of-way, it was necessary to modify the limits of the stone fill. The updatedarea of stone fill increased the permanent impacts, and reduced the temporary impacts. but the total impacted area remained thesame. All impacts are now on the Town’s property.13. The permit is amended to increase the permanent impact area and decrease the area of temporary impacts with no change in thetotal impact area.

2015-02713 WELLS, KRISTEN/RICHARDCHESTERFIELD Spofford Lake

Requested Action:Install a 6 ft. x 42 ft. seasonal docking structure with two seasonal PWC lifts in the southerly slip, on an average of 95 feet ofshoreline frontage. Spofford Lake, Chesterfield.* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

APPROVE PERMIT:Install a 6 ft. x 42 ft. seasonal docking structure with two seasonal PWC lifts in the southerly slip, on an average of 95 feet ofshoreline frontage, Spofford Lake, Chesterfield.

DecisionReport 22 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by New Hampshire Environmental Consultants dated August 17, 2015, and revisedthrough January 20, 2016, as received by DES on January 22, 2016.2. This permit is not valid and effective until it has been recorded with the appropriate county Registry of Deeds by the applicant.Prior to starting work under this permit, the permitted shall submit a copy of the recorded permit to the DES Wetlands Program bycertified mail, return receipt requested.3. All development activities associated with this project shall be conducted in compliance with applicable requirements of RSA483-B and N.H. Code of Administrative Rules Env-Wq 1400 during and after construction.4. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and saplingpoint score below the minimum required per RSA 4$3-B:9, V, (a)(2)(D)(iv).5. Work authorized shall be carried out such that there are no discharges in or to spawning or nursery areas during spawningseasons. Impacts to such areas shall be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable during all other times of the year.6. Work shall be carried out in a time and manner to avoid disturbances to migratory waterfowl breeding and nesting areas.7. Appropriate siltation and erosion controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction, andshall remain until the area is stabilized. Temporary controls shall be removed once the area has been stabilized.8. Appropriate turbidity controls shall be installed prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction such that noturbidity escapes the inmiediate dredge area and shall remain until suspended particles have settled and water at the work site hasreturned to normal clarity.9. The contractor responsible for completion of the work shall use techniques described in the New Hampshire Stormwater Manual,Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).10. Any subdivision of the property that results in the structure being located on a lot having less than 75 ft. of frontage will requireremoval of a sufficient portion of the docking structures to comply with the dock size and density requirements in effect at the timeof the subdivision.11. Only those structures shown on the approved plans shall be installed or constructed along this frontage. All portions of thestructures shall be at least 20 ft. from the abutting property lines or the imaginary extension of those lines into the water.13. No portion of the pier shall extend more than 42 feet from the shoreline at full lake elevation (Elev. 716).14. All seasonal structures, including watercraft lifts, shall be removed for the non-boating season.

With Findings:1. This is a minimum impact project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.04(a), installation of a seasonal docking structureproviding no more than 2 slips.2. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01.

3. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areasand environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03.4. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 302.04(b) Requirements for ApplicationEvaluation, has been considered in the design of the project.

2015-03342 FARNESE, JOSEPHEPPING Unnamed Wetland

Requested Action:Dredge and fill 598 sq. ft. of wetlands for lot development to construct a commercial building.

APPROVE PERMIT:Dredge and fill 598 sq. ft. of wetlands for lot development to construct a commercial building.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Beals Associates, PLLC dated November 2015 as received by the NH Departmentof Environmental Services (DES) on December 17, 2015.

DecisionReport 23 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

2. This permit is not valid unless an Alteration of Terrain permit or other method of compliance with RSA 485-A:17 and Env-Wq1500 is achieved, if necessary.3. This permit is not valid unless a septic system construction approval or other compliance with RSA 485-A:29-44 and Env-Wq1000 is achieved, if necessary.4. Any further alteration of areas on this property that are subject to RSA 482-A jurisdiction will require a new application andfurther permitting.5. No person undertaking any activity shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause or contribute to, any violations ofthe surface water quality standards in RSA 485-A and Env-Wq 1700.6. Appropriate siltation and erosion controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction, andshall remain until the area is stabilized. Temporary controls shall be removed once the area has been stabilized.7. The contractor responsible for completion of the work shall use techniques described in the New Hampshire Stormwater Manual,Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).8. Extreme precautions shall be taken within riparian areas to prevent unnecessary removal of vegetation during construction. Areascleared of vegetation must be revegetated with like native species within three days of the completion of the disturbance.9. Dredged materials, whether to be stockpiled or disposed of shall be dewatered in sedimentation basins lined with siltation anderosion controls, and located outside of areas subject to RSA 482-A jurisdiction.10. Construction equipment shall be inspected daily for leaking fuel, oil, and hydraulic fluid prior to entering surface waters orwetlands or operating in an area where such fluids could reach groundwater, surface waters, or wetlands.11. The permittee’s contractor shall maintain appropriate oil/diesel fuel spill kits on site that are readily accessible at all times duringconstruction, and shall train each operator in the use of the kits.12. All refueling of equipment shall occur outside of surface waters or wetlands during construction. Machinery shall be staged andrefueled in upland areas only.13. Within three days of final grading or temporary suspension of work in an area that is in or adjacent to wetlands or surfacewaters, all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized by seeding and mulching during the growing season, or if not within the growingseason, by mulching with tackifiers on slopes less than 3:1 or netting and pinning on slopes steeper than 3:1.

2. This permit is contingent on approval by the DES Alteration of Terrain Program.3. This permit is contingent on approval by the DES Subsurface Systetns Bureau.4. Orange construction fencing shall be placed at the limits of construction to prevent accidental encroachment on wetlands.5. Appropriate siltation/erosion/turbidity controls shall be in place prior to construction, shall be maintained during construction,and remain in place until the area is stabilized. Silt fence(s) must be removed once the area is stabilized.6. Within three days of final grading or temporary suspension of work, all exposed soil areas shall be stabilized by seeding andmulching during the growing season, or if not within the growing season, by mulching with tack or netting and pinning on slopessteeper than 3:1.7. The contractor responsible for completion of the work shall utilize techniques described in the New Hampshire StonrnvaterManual, Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).8. Dredged material shall be placed outside of the jurisdiction of the DES Wetlands Bureau.

With Findings:1. This is a minimum impact project per Administrative Rule Env-Wt 303.04(0, alteration of less than 3,000 sq. ft. of swamps.2. DES issued a permit July 16, 2009, Wetlands Permit 2009-000$6, for this property to dredge and fill 709 sq. ft. of wetlands forlot development to construct a commercial building. The permit expired July 16, 2014 and the property was not developed in thattimeframe.3. The need for the proposed impacts has been demonstrated by the applicant per Env-Wt 302.01. Due to the position of the wetlandfinger on the lot, it is necessary to impact a small portion of the wetland to develop the lot with a small commercial building.4. The applicant has provided evidence which demonstrates that this proposal is the alternative with the least adverse impact to areasand environments under the department’s jurisdiction per Env-Wt 302.03. The applicant has avoided the wetland to the greatestdegree practicable and still meets the intended use which reduced the impact from 709 sq. ft. to 598 sq. ft. Impacts were reduced byproposing a smaller footprint building and parking and moving the development further away from the wetland.

DecisionReport 24 02/16/2016for Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

5. The applicant has demonstrated by plan and example that each factor listed in Env-Wt 302.04(b) Requirements for Application

Evaluation, has been considered in the design of the project. 6. The NH Natural Heritage Bureau (NHB) has record of sensitive

species within the project vicinity, but NI-TB does not expect impacts to the species by the project.7. The Epping Conservation Commission did not submit comments to DES on the application.

FORESTRY NOTIFICATION

***************************************************

20 16-00305 NEW JEFFERSON HOLDING LLCLINCOLN Unnamed Stream

COMPLETE NOTIFICATION:Lincoln, Tax Map #115, Lot #17

2016-00324 BLAISDELL, ROSCOENOTTINGHAM Unnamed Stream

Requested Action:Nottingham, Tax Map #74, Lot # 2, 3************************************

20 16-00343 GALUSZKA, MICHAELMILAN Unnamed Stream

Requested Action:Milan, Tax Map #42, Lot #3************************************

2016-00346 RICHARDSON, LARSHANOVER Unnamed Stream

Requested Action:Hanover, Tax Map #5, Lot #83************************************

20 16-00348 RED RIVER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC

COLEBROOK Unnamed Stream

COMPLETE NOTIFICATION:Colebrook, Tax Map # 225-8

2016-00352 MARTIN, JONBRIDGEWATER Unnamed Stream

DecisionReport 25 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

COMPLETE NOTIFICATION:Bridgewater. Tax Map #206, Lot # 9.2

2016-00360 DUCHENEAU, CYNTHIA/RICHARDWARREN Unnamed Stream

Requested Action:Warren, Tax Map #224, Lot #1, Tax Map #223, Lot #2* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

2016-00377 WALLACE, GREGMOULTONBOROUGH Unnamed Stream

Requested Action:Moukonborough, Tax Map 49, Lot 5************************************

GOLD DREDGE

********* * *** *** ****************** ** * * *************

2016-00350 MOSES, ADAM(ALL TOWNS) Unnamed Stream

Conservation Commission/Staff Comments:cc: Bath Con Corn

2016-00351 BOURNE, ROY(ALL TOWNS) Unnamed Stream

Conservation Commission/Staff Comments:cc: Bath Con Corn

2016-00361 CLARK, JOHN(ALL TOWNS) Unnamed Stream

Conservation Commission/Staff Comments:cc: Bath Con. Corn.

Decision Report 26 02/16/2016for Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

LAKES-SEASONAL DOCK NOTIF

***************************************************

20 16-00337 PANALL, MARKSANBORNVILLE Great fast Lake

Requested Action:Installation of a seasonal docking structure.************************************

COMPLETE NOTIFICATION:Installation of a seasonal docking structure.

2016-00362 BARRETT, LEVINELSON Granite Lake

Requested Action:Installation of a seasonal docking structure.************************************

COMPLETE NOTIFICATION:Installation of a seasonal docking structure.

CSPA PERMIT

2011-00024 MARDEN, ROBERTHOLDERNESS Squam Lake

Requested Action:Impact 1,200 sq ft in order to construct a two bedroom residence with a gravel driveway.************************************

APPROVE TIME EXTENSION:Impact 1,200 sq ft in order to construct a two bedroom structure.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Hinds Septic Design Services dated March 17, 2009 and received by the NHDepartment of Environmental Services (DES) on January 4, 2011. 2. No more than 3.8% of the area of the lot within the protectedshoreland shall be covered by impervious surfaces unless additional approval is obtained from DES.3. The project as proposed will leave approximately 21,016 sq ft of the Natural Woodland Buffer beyond the primary buildingsetback in an unaltered state. At least 21,016 sq ft of the Natural Woodland Buffer beyond the primary building setback must remainin an unaltered state in order to comply with RSA 483-B:9, V, (b), (2).4. Erosion and siltation controls shall be appropriate to the size and nature of the project and to the physical characteristics of thesite, including slope, soil type, vegetative cover, and proximity to wetlands or surface waters.5. All activities conducted in association with the completion of this project shall be conducted in a manner that complies withapplicable criteria of Administrative Rules Chapter Env-Wq 1400 and RSA 483-B during and after construction.

DecisionReport 27 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

6. No person undertaking any activity in the protected shoreland shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause orcontribute to, any violations of the surface water quality standards established in Env-Ws 1700 or successor rules in Env-Wq 1700.7. Any fill used shall be clean sand, gravel, rock, or other suitable material.8. This permit shall not preclude DES from taking any enforcement or revocation action if DES later determines that any of thestructures depicted as “existing’ on the plans submitted by the applicant were not previously permitted or grandfathered.

2015-00336 LOREN B MCCABE 2002 TRUSTMEREDITH Winnisquam Lake

Requested Action:Amendment Description: Revised planting plan.************************************

APPROVE AMENDMENT:Revision 1: Plan revised to include a stomiwater management plan.Revision 2: Plan revised to include vegetation plantings.

Impact 2,655 sq ft in order to construct a 25ft x 36ff attached garage, add an addition to the existing residnece, modify the driveway,and regrade along the west side of residence.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with revised plans by Ames Associates dated January 19, 2016 and G2 + 1 Inc. dated November17, 2015 and received by the NH Department of Environmental Services (DES) on February 5, 2016.2. No more than 2 1.9% of the area of the lot within the protected shoreland shall be covered by impervious surfaces unlessadditional approval is obtained from DES.3. The proposed stormwater management plan shall be designed, installed and maintained to effectively absorb and infiltratestormwater.4. At least 1,450 sq ft of the Natural Woodland Buffer beyond the primary building setback must remain in an unaltered state inorder to comply with RSA 4$3-B:9, V, (b), (2).5. All activities conducted in association with the completion of this project shall be conducted in a manner that complies withapplicable criteria of Administrative Rules Chapter Env-Wq 1400 and RSA 483-B during and after construction.6. Erosion and siltation controls shall be appropriate to the size and nature of the project and to the physical characteristics of thesite, including slope, soil type, vegetative cover, and proximity to wetlands or surface waters.7. No person undertaking any activity in the protected shoreland shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause orcontribute to, any violations of the surface water quality standards established in Env-Ws 1700 or successor rules in Env-Wq 1700.8. Any fill used shall be clean sand, gravel, rock, or other suitable material.9. This permit shall not preclude DES from taking any enforcement or revocation action if DES later determines that any of thestructures depicted as “existing” on the plans submitted by the applicant were not previously permitted or grandfathered.

20 15-02457 SAWYER POINT REALTY LLCTUFTONBORO Lake Winnipesaukee

Requested Action:Impact 251 sq ft in order to install a stormwater drip edge around primary structure and retain the work of a 13 ft x 14 ft addition andthe enclosure of a 13 ft x 14 ft porch.

APPROVE PERI’vIIT:Impact 251 sq ft in order to install a storunvater drip edge around primary structure and retain the work of a 13 ft x 14 ft addition andthe enclosure of a 13 ft x 14 ft porch.

Decision Report 28 02/16/2016for Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with revised plans by White Mountain Surveying dated February 11, 2014 and received by the

NH Department of Environmental Services (DES) on January 12, 2016.

2. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and sapling

point score below the minimum required per RSA 483-3:9, V, (a), (2), (D), (iv).

3. No more than 29% of the area of the lot within the protected shoreland shall be covered by impervious surfaces unless additional

approval is obtained from DES.4. At least 2,682 sq ft of the NaturaL Woodland Buffer beyond the primary building setback must remain in an unaltered state in

order to comply with RSA 483-B:9, V, (b), (2).5. All activities conducted in association with the completion of this project shall be conducted in a maimer that complies with

applicable criteria of Administrative Rules Chapter Env-Wq 1400 and RSA 483-B during and after construction.

6. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be installed prior to the start of work, be maintained throughout the project, and

remain in place until all disturbed surfaces are stabilized.7. Erosion and siltation controls shall be appropriate to the size and nature of the project and to the physical characteristics of the

site, including slope, soil type, vegetative cover, and proximity to wetlands or surface waters.

8. No person undertaking any activity in the protected shoreland shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause or

contribute to, any violations of the surface water quality standards established in Env-Ws 1700 or successor rules in Env-Wq 1700.

9. Any fill used shall be clean sand, gravel, rock, or other suitable material.

10. The individual responsible for completion of the work shall utilize techniques described in the New Hampshire Stonnwater

Manual, Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).

11. This permit shall not preclude DES from taking any enforcement or revocation action if DES later determines that any of the

structures depicted as “existing” on the plans submitted by the applicant were not previously permitted or grandfathered.

With Findings:1. The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NH DES) recieved a Shoreland Application for the property located

at Tax Map 28 / Lot # 3-15 in the Town of Tuftonboro on Lake Winnipesaukee.

2. The Shoreland Application is to retain the construction of a converted 13 ft x 14 ft porch to living space and the addition of a 13 ft

x 14 ft addition to a nonconforming structure.3. The Shoreland application proposes restoring a portion exsiting impervious driveway to pervious area and add stormwater drip

edge around the primary structure.4. Per RSA 483-B:10, I, Except as otherwise prohibited by law or applicable municipal ordinance, nonconforming structures located

within the protected shoreland may be repaired, replaced in kind, reconstructed in place, altered, or expanded, provisded the

structure is not extended closer to the reference line and the property is made more nearly conforming.

5. Revised plans by White Mountain Survey and Engineering and recieved by NH DES January 12, 2016 to withdraw the proposed

work for the restoration of the portion of driveway.

2015-02681 KNIGHT, JAMES

STODDARD Island Pond

Requested Action:Impact 3,500 sq ft in order to completely restore shoreland area that was disurbed inadvertantly.************************************

APPROVE PERMIT:Impact 3,500 sq ft in order to completely restore shoreland area that was disurbed inadvertantly.

With Conditions:

Decision Report 29 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/20 16

1. All work shall be in accordance with restoration plans by Paquin Land Surveying. PLIC dated January 6, 2016 and received bythe NH Department of Environmental Services (DES) on January 14, 2016.2. This permit does not authorize the removal of additional trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a treeand sapling point score below the minimum required per RSA 483-B:9, V, (a), (2), (D), (iv).3. All activities conducted in association with the completion of this project shall be conducted in a manner that complies withapplicable criteria of Administrative Rules Chapter Env-Wq 1400 and RSA 483-B during and after construction.4. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be installed prior to the start of work, be maintained throughout the project, andremain in place until all disturbed surfaces are stabilized.5. Erosion and siltation controls shall be appropriate to the size and nature of the project and to the physical characteristics of thesite, including slope, soil type, vegetative cover, and proximity to wetlands or surface waters.6. No person undertaking any activity in the protected shoreland shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause orcontribute to, any violations of the surface water quality standards established in Env-Ws 1700 or successor rules in Env-Wq 1700.7. Any fill used shall be clean sand, gravel, rock, or other suitable material.8. The individual responsible for completion of the work shall utilize techniques described in the New Hampshire StormwaterManual, Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).9. This permit shall not be interpreted as acceptance or approval of any impact that will occur within wetlands jurisdiction regulated

under RSA 482-A including all wetlands, surface waters and their banks, the tidal-buffer zone, and sand dunes. The owner is

responsible for maintaining compliance with RSA 482-A and Administrative Rules Env-Wt 100 - 900 and obtaining any WetlandImpact Permit that may be required prior to construction, excavation or fill that will occur within Wetlands jurisdiction.10. This permit shall not preclude DES from taking any enforcement or revocation action if DES later determines that any of thestructures depicted as ‘existing” on the plans submitted by the applicant were not previously permitted or grandfathered.

2016-00 118 RYAN, RICHARDPIERMONT Tarleton Lake

Requested Action:Impact 12,400 sq ft in order to remove existing nonconforming structure and shed, rebuild a new conforming primary structure withseptic system and storage shed.** ** * ** * * ** * **** *** ** ******* * *******

APPROVE PERMIT:Impact 12,400 sq ft in order to remove existing nonconforming structure and shed, rebuild a new conforming primary structure withseptic system and storage shed.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by R. Bret Ryan dated January 2016 and received by the NH Department ofEnvironmental Services (DES) on January 19, 2016.2. This permit is contingent on approval by the DES Subsurface Systems Bureau.3. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and saplingpoint score below the minimum required per RSA 483-B:9, V, (a), (2), (D), (iv).4. No more than 5.4% of the area of the lot within the protected shoreland shall be covered by impervious surfaces unless additionalapproval is obtained from DES.5. At least 8,152 sq ft of the Natural Woodland Buffer beyond the primary building setback must remain in an unaltered state inorder to comply with RSA 483-B:9, V, (b), (2).6. All activities conducted in association with the completion of this project shall be conducted in a manner that complies withapplicable criteria of Administrative Rules Chapter Env-Wq 1400 and RSA 483-B during and after construction.7. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be installed prior to the start of work, be maintained throughout the project, andremain in place until all disturbed surfaces are stabilized.8. Erosion and siltation controls shall be appropriate to the size and nature of the project and to the physical characteristics of thesite, including slope, soil type, vegetative cover, and proximity to wetlands or surface waters.9. No person undertaking any activity in the protected shoreland shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause or

DecisionReport 30 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

contribute to, any violations of the surface water quality standards established in Env-Ws 1700 or successor rules in Env-Wq 1700.10. Any fill used shall be clean sand, gravel, rock, or other suitable material.11. The individual responsible for completion of the work shall utilize techniques described in the New Hampshire StormwaterManual, Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 200$).12. This permit shall not be interpreted as acceptance or approval of any impact that will occur within wetlands jurisdictionregulated under RSA 482-A including all wetlands, surface waters and their banks, the tidal-buffer zone, and sand dunes. Theowner is responsible for maintaining compliance with RSA 482-A and Administrative Rules Env-Wt 100 - 900 and obtaining anyWetland Impact Permit that may be required prior to construction, excavation or fill that will occur within Wetlands jurisdiction.13. This permit shall not preclude DES from taking any enforcement or revocation action if DES later determines that any of thestructures depicted as ‘existing” on the plans submitted by the applicant were not previously permitted or grandfathered.

2016-00169 O’LEARY, DENISE/JAMESDANVILLE Long Pond

Requested Action:Impact 3,557 sq ft in order to demolish existing house and rebuild a new house further from the reference line.************************************

APPROVE PERMIT:Impact 3,557 sq ft in order to demolish existing house and rebuild a new house further from the reference line, construct a detachedgarage, and conduct associated grading.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Civil Construction Management, Inc. dated January 12, 2016 and received by theNH Department of Environmental Services (DES) on January 15, 2016.2. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and saplingpoint score below the minimum required per RSA 483-3:9, V, (a), (2), (D), (iv).3. No more than 16.7% of the area of the lot within the protected shoreland shall be covered by impervious surfaces unlessadditional approval is obtained from DES.4. At least 1,746 sq ft of the Natural Woodland Buffer beyond the primary building setback must remain in an unaltered state inorder to comply with RSA 4$3-B:9, V, (b), (2).5. All activities conducted in association with the completion of this project shall be conducted in a manner that complies withapplicable criteria of Administrative Rules Chapter Env-Wq 1400 and RSA 483-B during and after construction.6. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be installed prior to the start of work, be maintained throughout the project, andremain in place until all disturbed surfaces are stabilized.7. Erosion and siltation controls shall be appropriate to the size and nature of the project and to the physical characteristics of thesite, including slope, soil type, vegetative cover, and proximity to wetlands or surface waters.8. No person undertaking any activity in the protected shoreland shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause orcontribute to, any violations of the surface water quality standards established in Env-Ws 1700 or successor rules in Env-Wq 1700.9. Any fill used shall be clean sand, gravel, rock, or other suitable material.10. The individual responsible for completion of the work shall utilize techniques described in the New Hampshire StormwaterManual, Volume 3, Erosion and Sediment Controls During Construction (December 2008).11. This permit shall not be interpreted as acceptance or approval of any impact that will occur within wetlands jurisdictionregulated under RSA 482-A including all wetlands, surface waters and their banks, the tidal-buffer zone, and sand dunes. Theowner is responsible for maintaining compliance with RSA 482-A and Administrative Rules Env-Wt 100 - 900 and obtaining anyWetland Impact Permit that may be required prior to construction, excavation or fill that will occur within Wetlands jurisdiction.12. This permit shall not preclude DES from taking any enforcement or revocation action if DES later determines that any of thestructures depicted as “existing” on the plans submitted by the applicant were not previously permitted or grandfathered.

2016-00171 SADDLE LOT 3, LLCDOVER Cocheco River

DecisionReport 31 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/2016

Requested Action:Impact 35,400 sq ft in order to construct a house, driveway, sidewalks, and future pooi area.** *** ** * * * * * * ** ** ** * ***** * ** * * * * * * * *

APPROVE PERMIT:Impact 35,400 sq ft in order to construct a house, driveway, sidewalks, and future pool area.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Norway Plains Associates, Inc. dated December 2015 and received by the NHDepartment of Environmental Services (DES) on January 15, 2016.2. This permit is contingent on approval by the DES Subsurface Systems Bureau.3. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and saplingpoint score below the minimum required per RSA 483-B:9, V, (a), (2), (D), (iv).4. No more than 9.5% of the area of the lot within the protected shoreland shall be covered by impervious surfaces unless additional

approval is obtained from DES.5. At least 5,743 sq ft of the Natural Woodland Buffer beyond the primary building setback must remain in an unaltered state in

order to comply with RSA 483-B:9, V, (b), (2).6. All activities conducted in association with the completion of this project shall be conducted in a manner that complies with

applicable criteria of Administrative Rules Chapter Env-Wq 1400 and RSA 483-B during and after construction.7. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be installed prior to the start of work, be maintained throughout the project, and

remain in place until all disturbed surfaces are stabilized.8. Erosion and siltation controls shall be appropriate to the size and nature of the project and to the physical characteristics of the

site, including slope, soil type. vegetative cover, and proximity to wetlands or surface waters.9. No person undertaking any activity in the protected shoreland shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause or

contribute to, any violations of the surface water quality standards established in Env-Ws 1700 or successor rules in Env-Wq 1700.

10. Any fill used shall be clean sand, gravel, rock, or other suitable material.

2016-00 186 JAi’1ES, DEBORAH

BARRINGTON Ayers Lake

Requested Action:Impact 4,477 sq ft in order to remove existing house, rein exact location using same foundation, add a deck, replace patio, add accesslanding and steps, remove to garage style buildings, and add a new garage.************************************

APPROVE PERMIT:Impact 4,477 sq ft in order to remove existing house, rein exact location using same foundation, add a deck, replace patio, add access

landing and steps, remove to garage style buildings, and add a new garage.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by Ben-v Surveying and Engineering dated December 4, 2015 and received by the NH

Department of Enviromnental Services (DES) on January 19, 2016.2. This permit does not authorize the removal of trees or saplings within the waterfront buffer that would result in a tree and sapling

point score below the minimum required per RSA 483-3:9, V, (a), (2), (D), (iv).3. No more than 17.4% of the area of the lot within the protected shoreland shall be covered by impervious surfaces unless

additional approval is obtained from DES.4. All activities conducted in association with the completion of this project shall be conducted in a manner that complies with

applicable criteria of Administrative Rules Chapter Env-Wq 1400 and RSA 483-B during and after construction.

5. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be installed prior to the start of work, be maintained throughout the project, and

Decision Report 32 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/20 16 to 02/14/20 16

remain in place until all disturbed surfaces are stabilized.6. Erosion and siltation controls shall be appropriate to the size and nature of the project and to the physical characteristics of thesite, including slope, soil type, vegetative cover, and proximity to wetlands or surface waters.7. No person undertaking any activity in the protected shoreland shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause orcontribute to, any violations of the surface water quality standards established in Env-Ws 1700 or successor rules in Env-Wq 1700.8. Any fill used shall be clean sand, gravel, rock, or other suitable material.9. This permit shall not preclude DES from taking any enforcement or revocation action if DES later determines that any of thestructures depicted as “existing” on the plans submitted by the applicant were not previously permitted or grandfathered.

2016-00188 DESJARDINS, JAMES/SUSANSALEM Canobie Lake

Requested Action:Impact 3,690 sq ft in order to construct a new 14 ft x 38 ft porch and a 24 ft x 24 ft garage. Project includes, reconstruction of theexisting driveway and removal of existing septic system in order to connect to town sewer.************************************

APPROVE PERMIT:Impact 3,690 sq ft in order to construct a new 14 ft x 38 ft porch and a 24 fix 24 ft garage. Project includes, reconstruction of theexisting driveway and removal of existing septic system in order to connect to town sewer.

With Conditions:1. All work shall be in accordance with plans by MI-IF Design Consultants, Inc. dated January 7, 2016 and received by the NHDepartment of Environmental Services (DES) on January 19, 2016.2. No more than 23.4% of the area of the lot within the protected shoreland shall be covered by impervious surfaces unlessadditional approval is obtained from DES.3. All activities conducted in association with the completion of this project shall be conducted in a manner that complies withapplicable criteria of Administrative Rules Chapter Env-Wq 1400 and RSA 483-B during and after construction.4. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be installed prior to the start of work, be maintained throughout the project, andremain in place until all disturbed surfaces are stabilized.5. Erosion and siltation controls shall be appropriate to the size and nature of the project and to the physical characteristics of thesite, including slope, soil type, vegetative cover, and proximity to wetlands or surface waters.6. No person undertaking any activity in the protected shoreland shall cause or contribute to, or allow the activity to cause orcontribute to, any violations of the surface water quality standards established in Env-Ws 1700 or successor rules in Env-Wq 1700.7. Any fill used shall be clean sand, gravel, rock, or other suitable material.8. This permit shall not preclude DES from taking any enforcement or revocation action if DES later determines that any of thestructures depicted as “existing” on the plans submitted by the applicant were not previously permitted or grandfathered.

UTILITY NOTIFICATION

2016-00339 EVERSOURCE ENERGYEXETER Unnamed Wetland

Conservation Commission/Staff Comments:See file 20 16-0005 for fee amount.

Decision Report 33 02/16/2016For Actions Taken 02/08/2016 to 02/14/2016

EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION

*********** **** **************** * ***** * * * ** * ******* *

2015-02478 CAROL L HESS REAL ESTATE LLCBOW

Requested Action:Confirm Emergency Authorization issued by DES on 9/18/2015 to stabilize an upper section of river bank (‘Merrimack River’) thatwas failing and causing the adjacent parking lot to collapse.************************************

With Findings:1. This project is classified as a minimum impact project per Env-Wt 303.04(o) Projects deemed minimum impact by thedepartment based on the degree of environmental impact.2. Work was needed immediately to prevent further collapse of the parking area and bank.3. A NH licensed professional engineer (‘PE’) provided the repair proposal and subsequent follow-up report.4. The project also included work within the protected shoreland, NHDES Wetlands Bureau/Shoreland Program file #2015-02522.