Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Western Upland Poverty
Alleviation Project Alleviation Project Supervision Mission March 16-31,
2014
Content of PresentationIntroduction
CIP activities, budget allocation and Beneficiaries
Project coverage status
Financial progress
CIP Implementation Status
Finding, Learning and Issues
CIP activities, budget allocation and Beneficiaries
Introduction
Country: NEPAL
Project Title: Western Uplands Poverty Alleviation
Project (WUPAP)
Project Number: LN 576 NP/GN 567 NP
Financial year: 2070-2071 (2013-2014)
Planning period: 16th July, 2013 to 15th July 2014
Year of implementation Year IInd IIIrd Phase
Total project budget (in USD): US $ 14.82 million
Total expenditures to date (in USD): US $ 505866.02 @94.5
Cumulative budget expenditure US $ 1365906.45 @94.5
Status
Cumulative budget expenditure US $ 1365906.45 @94.5
Date of loan effectiveness: 1 January 2003
Date of project start: 1 January, 2003
Project duration: 13 years
Date of project closing: 15 July, 2016
Date of latest Logframe revision May 2012
Date of RIMS benchmark survey: July, 2007
Date of RIMS mid-term survey: July, 2010
Date of RIMS completion survey: July, 2016
Date of Mid-Term Review 2014-15
Date of Completion Review 2016
Background
• WUPAP (Western Uplands Poverty Alleviation Project) was initially designed on integrated rural development approach framework to support devolution process of the local bodies in Nepal funded by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
• IIIrd phase will be focused in remaining 8 districts and 153 VDC.IIIrd phase will be focused in remaining 8 districts and 153 VDC.
• It has three components:
(i) Community Empowerment,
(ii) District Service Delivery Improvement, and
(iii) Project Management
Phase of WUPAP
Phase Original Design ModifiedNo of
year
Ist
Phase
1st January 2003 to
15th July 2007
1st January 2003 to
15th July 2007 4 Years
IInd
Phase
16th July 2007 to
15th July 2011
16th July 2007 to
15th July 2012 5 Years
IIIrd
Phase
16th July 2011 to
31st March 2014
16th July 2012 to
15th July 2016 4 Years
Project Objective
• To create vibrant grass roots institutions that will respond to the needs of the people, especially the target group and empower them to mobilize their own resources to access external resources and claim social justice.
• Design of the IIIrd Phase project activities are aligned • Design of the IIIrd Phase project activities are aligned with strengthening the livelihood system of the poor and socially disadvantaged people living in the area. Main target is to prepare the community to move forward towards economic enhancement by providing them the authority to make decision on activities and fund allocation on those activities.
Project coverage status Project coverage status
Project Area
Comprehensive status of Physical coverage
75
District coverage
Districts 3915
9391500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
VDCs coverage
10
2
248
Nepal Mid and Far
development Region
WUPAP
939
1530
500
1000
1500
2000
In % VDCs
2
4
4
10
73
0
14
22
5
19
29
7
76
99
94
03
13
13
1
37
54
9
65
35
73
96
43
28
4
26
99
7
59
47
3
98
54
14
48
6
71
98
4
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
Ho
use
ho
ld
Ethnicity wise household coverage
10
73
0
14
22
5
19
66
56
58
12
10
31
36
76
99
13
53
14
32
48
7
94
03
13
13
1
65
35
73
96
21
4898
54
14
48
6
38
30
0
10000
20000
HH covered
by CPCU
HH covered
by CO
HH
Covered by
LFUG
HH from
COs
included in
CPCU
HHs from
LFUGs
included in
CPCU
Total HH
coverage
Dalit Janajati Other Total
Ethnicity wise household proportion at
working VDCs
Dalit, 3
1302
TOTAL HH IN 153 VDC
Dalit, 1
9297
COVERED HH
1302
Janajat
i, 1903
2
Other,
76942
9297
Janajati
, 9403
other, 4
3284
Dalit
27%
% OF ETHNIC RATIO IN
COVERAGE
Dalit
25%
% OF ETHNIC PRESENCE OF
WORKING AREA
Ethnicity wise household proportion in %
Janajati
13%
other
60%
25%
Janajat
i
15%
Other
60%
17
50
41
23
88
51
23
51
05
47
39
56
38
12
17
37
52
60
75
64
77
26
66
25
21
55
60
21
20
76
42
76
36
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
Total Population VS Coverage Population
56.53 % of population
has been benefitted
form project at VDCs
88
68
1
86
36
0 17
50
41
53
68
5
53
79
5
10
74
80
23
88
51
23
51
05
54
67
0
53
23
9
10
79
09
26
52
4
26
57
8
53
10
2 13
43
66
13
22
59
21
55
60
21
20
76
0
100000
200000
300000
Men Women Total Men Women Total Men Women Total Men Women Total
Dalit Janajati Other cast Total
Total pop Covered Pop
Financial Status
Project BudgetAgreement amount in million
US $ Source NRs
20 IFAD, Loan 1,890.00
5.9 Government of Nepal 557.55
2.2 Local Governance 207.90
0.036 Private 3.40
0.36 IFAD, Grant 34.02
0.19 IFAD, Grant 17.96
28.69 2,710.83
Exchange rate @ Nrs 94.5
Till Magh
End
Category Category description
Original
Allocation in
US $
Original
Allocation in
NRs.
Expenses
GoN IFAD TotalPercentage
IFAD
III-1 Equipment & Vehicle 255,000.00 24,097,500.00 667,386.00 3,503,776.00 4,171,162.00 14.54
III-2 Study, Survey, Training & Workshop 3,165,000.00 299,092,500.00 9,973,999.32 52,363,492.37 62,337,491.69 17.51
III-3 Local Technical Assistance 750,000.00 70,875,000.00 1,505,712.72 7,904,992.28 9,410,705.00 11.15III-3 Local Technical Assistance 750,000.00 70,875,000.00 1,505,712.72 7,904,992.28 9,410,705.00 11.15
III-4 Challenging Fund 330,000.00 31,185,000.00 - - - 0
III-5 Community Investment Fund 4,320,000.00 408,240,000.00 240,000.00 1,260,000.00 1,500,000.00 0.31
III-6 Operation & Manitenance 780,000.00 73,710,000.00 3,623,728.09 19,025,270.41 22,648,998.50 25.81
III-8 Salary 29,009,803.10 29,009,803.10
Un-allocated 300,000.00 28,350,000.00 - - 0
CIP activities, budget allocation and Beneficiaries
17
15 2
14
4
15
78 1
99
9
14
71
19
48
26
48
26
45
24
56
43
22
44
15
32
29
18
70
19
11
46
82
41
12
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Poor Poor Poor Poor participation in participation in participation in participation in CPCUCPCUCPCUCPCU
Dalit
40%Other
cast
49%
INCLUSIVE PARTICIPATION IN
CPCU
80
6
17
15
15
78
61
9
41
1
14
58
10
52
11
36
32
3
26
5
0
31
6
35
9
59
8
14
71
13
86
12
51
11
84
18
70
19
11
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Dalit Janajati Other cast Total
Janaja
ti
11%
49%
26997 poor households
affiliated with CPCU
Rolpa, 1500
Rukum, 1233
Bajura, 942
Bajhang, 1109
NO. OF POOREST OF THE POOR
HOUSEHOLDS IDENTIFIED THROUGH PRA
Dailekh, 971
Jajarkot, 717Kalikot, 639
Humla, 1912
9023 Poorest of the
Poor household
Identified
Particular
Beneficiaries of CIF
Dalit Janajati Other Total
Agriculture 5311 1888 6443 13642
Livestock 3765 1358 5085 10208
MAPs & NTFP 630 306 652 1588
Vocational skills 1271 376 1122 2769
Identified Activities and Beneficiaries of community investment fund for three year
Vocational skills 1271 376 1122 2769
Enterprise development 771 193 1071 2035
Market development 238 62 261 561
Cooperative promotion 937 236 1219 2392
seed capital for micro credit 1574 323 1639 3536
Small infrastructure development 1652 857 3377 5886
Capacity development 1392 498 1420 3310
Total 17541 6097 22289 45927
Identified Activities and Beneficiaries of community
investment fund for current year
Particular
Beneficiaries of CIF
Dalit Janajati Other Total
Agriculture 2146 709 2657 5512
Livestock 1237 666 1615 3518
MAPs & NTFP 304 163 266 733
Vocational skills 452 150 322 924Vocational skills 452 150 322 924
Enterprise development 326 59 359 744
Market development 148 5 183 336
Cooperative promotion 216 63 181 460
seed capital for micro credit 70 14 35 119
Small infrastructure development 792 508 1454 2754
Capacity development 326 164 408 898
Total 6017 2501 7480 15998
Agriculture
10%
Livestock
28%
Infrastructure
28%
Capacity
development
6%
Budget allocation
MAPs & NTFP
2%
Vocational skills
11%
Enterprise
5%
Market Network
2%
Cooperative
promotion
3%
Seed capital
5%
In total 429554 thousand amount
allocated
33
%
45
22
%
Budget
allocation by
year Agriculture
11%
Cooperative
seed capital
0%
Small
infrastructure
development
25%
Capacity
development
5%
BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THIS FY
45
%
This year
Next year
Last year In total 164570 thousand amount
allocated
Livestock
36%
MAPs & NTFP
2%
Vocational skills
14%
Enterprise
4%
Market
development
2%
Cooperative
1%
Project implementation status Project implementation status
19
5 07
14
15
17
8
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
CIP implementation status upto 12 Feb 2014
2318
2215
2015
20 20
0
5
10
15
Total VDCs Implemented VDCs
SNName of
District
Amount
invested
Benefitted household status
Dalit Janjati other Total
Female Total Female Total Female Total Male Female Total
1Bajhang 5243375 758 1434 0 0 1886 3720 2510 2644 5154
2Bajura 675880 21 49 0 1 36 90 83 57 140
3Humla 0 0 0 0 0 0
Implementation status
3Humla 0 0 0 0 0 0
4Kalikot 1549250 14 34 0 0 15 47 52 29 81
5Jajarkot 6660000 312 1558 82 377 815 2063 2789 1209 3998
6Dailekh 5883095 27 156 18 72 44 308 447 89 536
7Rukum 3296260 46 172 55 237 165 384 527 266 793
8Rolpa 1999100 46 96 119 233 105 243 302 270 572
Total
2530696
0 1224 3499 274 920 3066 6855 6710 456411274
Finding, Learning and Issues
29
97
43
90
44
85 53
75
70
21
4174
51185642
3917
6291
4543
7039
8263
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
No. HH affiliated with COs uplifted poverty
line
Findings of participatory well-being ranking
85
1
78
2
63
9 12
01
18
06
53
5 15
25
12
282
35
7
13
39
61
3
43
1
0
13
74
13
9
14
96
6
29
97
43
90
22
85
26
34
4174 3917
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Rolpa Rukum Dailekh Jajarkot Kalikot Humla Bajura Bajhang
Dalit Janajati Other cast Total
In total 44978 HH uplifted among
59473 HH
60.2
81.4 80.375.6
39.840.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
Ethnic wise CO Affiliated HH Poverty
Status
Findings of participatory well-being ranking
39.8
18.6 19.724.4
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
Dalit Janajati Other cast Total
% of HH uplifted poverty line % of HH below poverty line
30.87
38.3534.43 36.12
18.32
31.6935.09
44.83
34.28
12
.47 1
9.8
1
18
.75
22
.40
18
.74
17
.50
13
.24
16
.48
14
.37
19
.17
15
.38
13
.31
24
.48
21
.48
16
.91
17
.07
14
.99 21
.14
24
.38
22
.17
14
.63
24
.44
25
.69
21
.69
21
.21
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
District Wise People Living Below Poverty Line
Findings of participatory well-being ranking
18.32
12
.47 1
9.8
1
18
.75
0.0
0
18
.74
17
.50
13
.24
16
.48
11
.22
14
.37
19
.17
15
.38
13
.31
16
.91
17
.07
14
.99
14
.63
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
Rolpa Rukum Dailekh Jajarkot Kalikot Humla Bajura Bajhang Average
in total
Dalit Janjati Other District Average
Learning
• Demands of poor people keeps on changing so CIP tends to change between the year
• It is conflict less to community segregation through participatory well being ranking.
• Local resource mapping and appraisal of community, sensitized them about opportunity and risk of themselves development.of themselves development.
Challenge• Challenging to include pro poor population in
Leadership Position because of limited exposure.
• Lack of knowledge on planning process.
• Excluded and backward community are much surprise with this CIP process. They are still not sure if they will get the services.
Lack of awareness with pro-poor about institution • Lack of awareness with pro-poor about institution development.
• Major challenge for service delivery in existing district.
• Mechanism of Government for the Infrastructure construction process. It is difficult (impossible to pro poor people to manage their participation cost in cash).
• Allocation of fund for service providers (overhead)
• Variation of district approve rate of commodity
• Migration of pro poor family
Issues
Migration of pro poor family
• Inclusion of institution like Cos, LFUGs whose activities are not included in CIP
• Sustainability of CPCU
