Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
irishfunds.ie
Brian Forrester,
Chairperson, Irish Funds
Partner, Deloitte
Industry Update and Key Developments
Chicago Seminar
11 March 2019
irishfunds.ie
Total Assets Under Administration –
Split between Irish & Non Irish Funds
Source: All data sourced from Central Bank of Ireland
989
1,271
2,0521,946
2,079
2,515 2,441
2,901
3,754
4,097 4,1324,310
5,289
4,823
689959
1,188899 1,078
1,288 1,3651,619
1,854 2,020 2,062 2,194
2,875 2,770
300
313
864 1,0471,001 1,227 1,075
1,282
1,900 2,077 2,0712,116
2,4142,053
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Dec-18
US
D B
illi
on
Total Domiciled and Non-Domiciled
Assets Under Administration
Total Non Domiciled Total Domiciled
irishfunds.ie
Fastest Growing of Largest European Fund
Domiciles
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q3 2018
Europe 0% 13% 23% 42% 58% 78% 97% 101%
Luxembourg 0% 14% 25% 48% 67% 77% 98% 104%
Ireland 0% 16% 27% 57% 80% 98% 126% 140%
France 0% 9% 10% 14% 21% 29% 37% 38%
Germany 0% 13% 24% 40% 53% 66% 80% 85%
UK 0% 17% 35% 59% 79% 77% 99% 101%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
% G
row
th
Europe Luxembourg Ireland France Germany UK
irishfunds.ie
With Global Distribution
Source: Lipper IM
• Data from the Central Bank of Ireland shows Irish domiciled
funds have investors from 90+ countries around the world
irishfunds.ie
Brexit - three interdependent themes
Distribution
Management
Models
(‘Delegation’)
Growth
OVER 2,700 IRISH
FUNDS SOLD TO UK
INVESTORS
$750bn
IN IRISH FUND ASSETS
MANAGED BY 190+ UK
FIRMS IN IRELAND
Continuity in UK investor
access to Irish funds
Continuity in
UK firm
management
of Irish funds
Increase Ireland’s growth
trajectory as an
international asset
management centre
SOURCE: Lipper IM Dec 2017
Monterey Ireland Fund Report 2017
Current context Target outcome
irishfunds.ie
Conclusion
EU Member & Strategically Positioned
+
International Hub for Globally Distributed Investment Funds
+
Unrivalled Experience and Expertise & the Widest Range of Fund Structures
15northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
Decelerating and De-escalating
Economic Themes For The Balance Of 2019
March 2019
Carl Tannenbaum
Chief Economist
Northern Trust
GLOBAL ECONOMIC RESEARCH
@NT_CTannenbaum
16northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
THEMES
Is The Expansion At Risk?
• Global growth is settling
Political Complications
• Setting sound policy is getting harder
The Trials and Tribulations of Trade
• China/U.S. ties are the key focus
Central Bankers Under Stress
• Dealing with a difficult combination of circumstances
17northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
HEADING FOR A RECORD?
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
2016 2017 2018 2019E
SAA
RU.S. Real GDP Growth
120
115
106
92
80
1991-2001
2009-Present
1961-1969
1982-1990
1938-1945
Longest U.S. Economic Expansions(in Months)
• Growth is tapering, as expected
• The current expansion is likely to set a new standard
Sources: Haver Analytics, Northern Trust, National Bureau of Economic Research
18northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
IRELAND CONTINUES TO PROSPER
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
2009 2012 2015 2018
Year
ove
r Ye
ar
Irish GDP Growth
-18%
-16%
-14%
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
4-q
uar
ter
mo
vin
g av
erag
e
Ireland: Deficit/GDP
•Still setting a strong pace
•Budget is now roughly balanced
Source: Haver Analytics
19northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
GIVING PAUSE
46.0
50.0
54.0
58.0
62.0
Jan-17 Jul-17 Jan-18 Jul-18 Jan-19
Purchasing Manager’s Indices
U.S. China Canada Eurozone
Expanding
Contracting
• Leading indicators and confidence are moderating
• Equity markets reflect concern
Sources: Haver Analytics, Bloomberg
70
80
90
100
110
Jun-18 Aug-18 Oct-18 Dec-18
Jun
e 2
01
8 =
10
0
Equity Market Performance
U.S. Canada Eurozone China
20northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
BROAD TRENDS IN TRADE
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Per
cen
t o
f G
DP
Global Merchandise Trade
• Globally, tariffs have moderated substantially
• Trade flows have consequently advanced dramatically
Sources: IMF, World Bank
21northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
BENEFITS DELIVERED
• Free trade has lowered prices and reduced poverty
Sources: World Bank, IMF
22northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
DETAILS MATTER
• Income inequality has been rising around the world
• Differences have been accentuated since the 2008 crisis
Sources: World Inequality Report, Federal Reserve
U.S. Share of Wealth by Wealth Percentile
23northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
SIGNIFICANT REGIONAL DIFFERENCES
Source: metro.co.uk
Source: University of Michigan
Source: The Economist
25northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
CHINA IS A GLOBAL FOCUS
• A renewed desire to level the playing field
• Key White House advisors advocate confrontation
Sources: OECD, Amazon.com
0.33
0.17
0.15
0.09
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.02
China
Canada
Australia
U.S.
OECD Average
Japan
U.K.
Germany
Index of RestrictionsOn Inbound Foreign Investment
(0 = fully open; 1 = fully closed)
26northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
CHINA FEELS THE PINCH
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
SAA
RChina: Real GDP Growth
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
China: PMI(Above 50 = Expanding)
Manufacturing
New Export Orders
• Current and leading indicators raise concerns
• A hard landing in China would be felt globally
Source: Haver Analytics
29northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
MONETARY NORMALIZATION
• Crisis-era accommodation is being unwound
• Quantitative easing is on the wane
Source: Bloomberg, Haver Analytics
-0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
Fed BoE BoC ECB BoJ
Central Bank Deposit Rates
Jan-19 Post-Crisis Low
20%
28%
40%
33%
100%
25%
22%
21%
55%
47%
U.S.
U.K.
Eurozone
Ireland
Japan
Central Bank AssetsAs a % of Nominal GDP
Mar-14 Sep-18
30northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
INFLATION
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
2015 2016 2017 2018
20
15
= 1
00
U.S. Inflation (CPI)
Food Apparel
Housing Medical Care
New Vehicles Airfare
• Struggling to hit targets, even amid very low unemployment
• Something secular may be going on
Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Haver Analytics
1.8%
1.1%
1.8%
0.5%
0.4%
1.2%
U.S.
Eurozone
U.K.
Ireland
Japan
Australia
Core Inflation Indicators(Year over Year)
31northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
DEEPLY IN DEBT
• Government debt has expanded since the crisis
• Consumer debt is still uncomfortably high in several countries
Sources: Haver Analytics, World Bank
80%
120%
160%
200%
240%
2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017
Household Debt/Income RatioU.K. U.S. Australia
Canada Ireland
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250%
Eurozone
UK
USA
Japan
Canada
Ireland
As a Percent of GDP
Government Debt
2017 2006
32northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
UNPREPARED TO RETIRE
• Unfunded pension obligations are immense
• Demographic trends will bring these to the surface
Sources: Citigroup, World Economic Forum
2 2 3 411 11 8
28
9 613
85
119
2633
137
$ T
rilli
on
Size of the Retirement Savings Gap
2015 gap 2050 gap
33northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
PARTING THOUGHTS
Markets and the economy have proven very resilient
• Performance has been outstanding, despite concerns
We need to recall why international commerce is so
beneficial
• Nationalism is damaging to global markets
The risk of an economic policy error is rising
• Policy formulation and communication are being done
very differently
34northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
BIOGRAPHY
Carl Tannenbaum is the Chief Economist for The Northern Trust. In this role, Mr. Tannenbaum briefs
clients and colleagues on the economy and business conditions, prepares the bank’s official economic
outlook and participates in forecast surveys. He is a member of the bank’s investment policy
committee, its capital committee, and its asset/liability management committee.
Mr. Tannenbaum publishes weekly commentaries and is frequently interviewed by media outlets such
as The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, and Reuters.
Prior to joining Northern Trust, Mr. Tannenbaum spent four years at the Federal Reserve, where he led
the risk section. He was deeply involved in the central bank’s response to the 2008 financial crisis,
helped to create and conduct its stress testing program, and advised senior Federal Reserve leaders on
developments in banking and the financial markets.
Mr. Tannenbaum began his career in banking at LaSalle Bank/ABN AMRO, a global banking
organization with $1 trillion in total assets. He served for more than 20 years there as the organization’s
Chief Economist and Head of Balance Sheet Management.
Mr. Tannenbaum is the current Chairman of the American Bankers Association’s Economic Advisory
Committee and is a past Chairman of the National Association for Business Economics, the Conference
of Business Economists, and the North American Asset/Liability Management Association.
Mr. Tannenbaum also serves on the Board of Working in the Schools (WITS), a literacy organization
that supports the Chicago Public Schools.
Mr. Tannenbaum holds an M.B.A. and a B.A. in finance and economics from the University of Chicago.
Carl R. Tannenbaum
Chief Economist
Northern Trust
35northerntrust.com | © NorthernTrust 2019
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Confidentiality Notice: This communication is confidential, may be privileged, and is meant only for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender as soon as possible. All materials contained in this presentation, including the description of Northern Trust, its systems,
processes and pricing methodology, are proprietary information of Northern Trust. In consideration of acceptance of these materials, the recipient agrees
that it will keep all such materials strictly confidential and that it will not, without the prior written consent of Northern Trust, distribute such materials or any
part thereof to any person outside the recipient’s organization or to any individual within the recipient’s organization who is not directly involved in reviewing
this presentation, unless required to do so by applicable law. If the recipient is a consultant acting on behalf of a third party client, the recipient may share
such materials with its client if it includes a copy of these restrictions with such materials. In such event, the client agrees to comply with these restrictions
in consideration of its accepting such materials.
© 2018 Northern Trust Corporation. Head Office: 50 South La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603 U.S.A. Incorporated with limited liability in the U.S.
Products and services provided by subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation may vary in different markets and are offered in accordance with local
regulation. This material is directed to professional clients only and is not intended for retail clients. Northern Trust Asset Management is composed of
Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50
South Capital Advisors, LLC, and personnel of The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited and The Northern Trust Company.
For Asia-Pacific markets, it is directed to expert, institutional, professional and wholesale investors only and should not be relied upon by retail clients or
investors. For legal and regulatory information about our offices and legal entities, visit northerntrust.com/disclosures. The following information is
provided to comply with local disclosure requirements: The Northern Trust Company, London Branch; Northern Trust Global Services Limited; Northern
Trust Global Investments Limited. The following information is provided to comply with Article 9(a) of The Central Bank of the UAE’s Board of Directors
Resolution No 57/3/1996 Regarding the Regulation for Representative Offices: Northern Trust Global Services Limited, Abu Dhabi Representative Office.
Northern Trust Global Services Limited Luxembourg Branch, 6 rue Lou Hemmer, L-1748 Senningerberg, Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Succursale d’une
société de droit étranger RCS B129936. Northern Trust Luxembourg Management Company S.A., 6 rue Lou Hemmer, L-1748 Senningerberg, Grand-
Duché de Luxembourg, Société anonyme RCS B99167. Northern Trust (Guernsey) Limited (2651)/Northern Trust Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) Limited
(29806)/Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Guernsey) Limited (15532) Registered Office: Trafalgar Court Les Banques, St Peter
Port, Guernsey GY1 3DA. Issued in the United Kingdom by Northern Trust Global Investments Limited. The Northern Trust Company of Saudi Arabia – a
Saudi closed joint stock company – Capital SAR 52 million. Licensed by the Capital Market Authority – License No. 12163-26 – C.R: 1010366439. January
2018
© 2018 Northern Trust Corporation. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Any rebroadcast, retransmission, distributing, copying or use of this
presentation or any of its content without the express written consent of Northern Trust Corporation is strictly prohibited.
Moderator:
Panellists:
irishfunds.ie
Domiciling in Ireland – Fund Structures and
Advantages
Brian Lavery, PwC
Michael James, Nuveen
Tony Spratt, McCann Fitzgerald
Siobhán McBean, Arthur Cox
irishfunds.ie
Next steps
Consideration to be given to
the impact of European
Parliament elections to be
held on May 23-26, 2019?
irishfunds.ie
Possible outcomes
Norwegian Model:
European Economic Area (EEA) +
European Free Trade Association (EFTA)
Mexican or Canadian Model:
Free Trade Agreement (FTA)
Swiss Model:
Bilateral accords + EFTA
Turkish Model:
Customs union
World Trade
Organization (WTO)
irishfunds.ie
Possible outcomes
Norwegian Model: European Economic Area (EEA) + European Free Trade Association (EFTA)
The UK could join the EEA and the EFTA and continue to have full access to the single market. It would have to adopt EU regulations and standards. Norway also
co-operates with the EU on a broad range of policy areas through the EEA agreement and other bilateral agreements. The EEA was established in 1994 and three EFTA
states (Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) are currently members. Would have to contribute to the EU budget but have no say but would have some autonomy.
Turkish Model: Customs union
The UK could enter into a customs union with the EU. Goods could be exported to the EU without tariffs or customs restrictions, but the UK would be required to
comply with various areas of EU regulation. Many sectors may be excluded from a customs union and services, including financial services (hard to monitor), may not
be covered at all. A customs union has been in place between the EU and Turkey since 1995. Could negotiate in FS but would be difficult, if an agreement was made
the EU would look for equivalency on regulation and a lot of restrictions, probably not agreeable with the Brexiteers.
Swiss Model: Bilateral accords + EFTA
The UK could agree a set of bilateral agreements governing access to the single market, sector by sector. It would not get full access to the internal market but would
also not be required to comply with EU law except in relation to exports and investments into the EU. The UK could also become a member of EFTA. Switzerland is a
member of EFTA and has negotiated a special relationship with the EU through various bilateral accords and trade treaties. Could negotiate in FS but would be
difficult, if the an agreement was made the EU would look for equivalency on regulation and a lot of restrictions, probably not agreeable with the Brexiteers.
Mexican or Canadian Model: Free Trade Agreement (FTA)
The UK could agree its own free trade agreement with the EU. This could lead to a single comprehensive deal rather than piecemeal agreements. It could potentially
involve greater continuity of the single market at the cost of political autonomy. Mexico has a free trade agreement in place with the EU for goods and services.
The EU is currently Mexico’s largest export market after the US. Practically all trade in goods between the EU and Mexico will now be duty-free, including in the
agricultural sector. Canada also FTA with the EU called Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).
World Trade Organization (WTO)
The UK could rely on existing WTO rules and there would then be no negotiations for new agreements between the EU and the UK. The UK would gain full autonomy
over its trade policy. However it would no longer have dual representation as both the UK and as a member of the EU. China joined the WTO in 2001 after 15 years of
negotiation. China is currently the EU’s biggest trading partner after the US. The UK is already a member in its own right, but it will have to agree a new list of tariff
schedules once it is no longer part of the EU, which could take time.
irishfunds.ie
Temporary measures
• Temporary permissions regime (TPR)
– TPR will allow currently passported EEA firms to operate in the UK for a limited period
– The TPR alleviates some short term risks of a hard Brexit
– EEA firms need to notify the FCA by 28 March 2019
– The temporary permission is effective from date of exit for 3 years
– This is only available where the fund is being marketed in the UK
• EU Memorandum of understanding (MOU)
– MOU is required between the regulator of the EU member state and the UK
– Expected an MOU will be agreed between the CBI and the UK prior to 29 March 2019
– TPR and MOU are short term solutions to avoid the impact of a hard Brexit
irishfunds.ie
Establish an EU27 domiciled UCITS management or
AIFM entity
ESMA has directed European national competent authorities (NCAs) e.g. the Central
Bank of Ireland (CBI), to assess UCITS Manco and AIFM applications based on 9
general principles.
1. No automatic recognition of existing authorisations
2. Authorisations granted by EU27 NCAs should be rigorous and efficient
3. NCAs should be able to verify the objective reasons for relocation
4. Special attention should be granted to avoid letter-box entities in the EU27
5. Outsourcing and delegation to third countries is only possible under strict conditions
6. NCAs should ensure that substance requirements are met
7. NCAs should ensure sound governance of EU entities
8. NCAs must be in a position to effectively supervise and enforce Union law
9. Coordination to ensure effective monitoring by ESMA
irishfunds.ie
Establish an EU27 domiciled UCITS management or
AIFM entity
• Staffing within a UCITS Manco/AIFM is of particular focus
• Expected roles/functions within a UCITS Manco/AIFM
– The CEO
– Head of Investment/CIO
– Head of Compliance
– Head of Distribution
– Head of Risk
• The requirement for and time commitments of the above roles is determined on a case
by case basis
irishfunds.ie
Establish an EU27 domiciled UCITS management or
AIFM entity
Where delegation of portfolio/risk management function from the UCITS Manco/AIFM back to a UK Entity is planned:
– UCITS Manco/AIFM must demonstrate it will maintain control over these functions,
– UCITS Manco/AIFM will maintain responsibility for the outsourced function
– Ultimately the CBI are focusing on satisfying the substance principle.
"I would like to make it clear that we will not lower our assessment standards and if you have not delivered on our expectations we will not authorise you. Our assessment standards include ensuring you are properly capitalised, have sufficiently experienced and knowledgeable people based in Ireland, a clear plan to when the firm will be operationalised and robust risk frameworks in place". Michael Hodson, Director of Asset Management and Investment Banking at the CBI
irishfunds.ie
Super Manco entities
– Dual authorised entity supporting the regulatory compliance of UCITS
and AIF entities
– Multiple fund ranges are managed
– Service a range of UCITS and AIF Strategies with a single
– legal entity
– Board of directors
– capital requirements
– pan European passport
– Efficient solution to the Brexit issue
irishfunds.ie
Future growth
Tax and
customsLocation
Funding and
ownership
Supplier and
supply chainPeople
Core
operations
Legal, data and
regulation
Customers and
markets
Nine area’s of focus
irishfunds.ie
Nine lenses
Customers and markets
Transitional Permissions Regimes effectively enables EU financial services firms, who currently passport into the UK and who
wish to continue after ’Exit Day’, to do so for up to three years.
The UK government has indicated that they will allow firms with ‘single European passports’ to enter into the UK and continue
carrying out business in the UK, for a limited period even if the passporting regime disappears after Brexit. However, it is
important to note that the EU has not yet formally reciprocated this regime and barriers for UK firms to operate into the EU may
persist. The outcome here is uncertain.
Legal, data and regulation
Transfers of personal data from the UK to the EU will continue without interruption. This is because the UK plans to make an
adequacy decision in favour of the EU, based on the degree of alignment between the UK and EU’s data protection laws. The
UK will keep this position under review. However, transfers of personal data from the EU to the UK will be impacted. The
guidance suggests that we do not yet know exactly how these transfers will be affected. The EU may make an adequacy
decision in favour of the UK, allowing the free flow of personal data outside the EU, to the UK;
Core operations
Any manager will need to consider core operations that are performed outside the EU.
People
The Irish talent pool in the industry is reaching a critical point, can the Irish economy in the short term absorb all the additional
requirements? Will talent move from the UK? Will the new arrivals in high paid jobs drive property prices higher in the Dublin
area and overall cause wage inflation?
irishfunds.ie
Nine lenses
Supplier and supply chain
The capacity of UK firms to market their fund products within the EU 27 may be severely impacted by a hard Brexit. The capacity to
sell EU domiciled funds into the UK may also be compromised. UK firms, even those with UCITS or EU AIFs, may find that although
they have the correct product range, the lack of a MiFID authorisation or of a UCITS ManCo or AIFM authorisation means that they
cannot market their products themselves and have to rely on third parties, or in the case of AIFs, on private placement regimes. Sales
into the UK of EU products may likewise suffer a loss of straight forward marketing opportunities, with product producers possibly
having to duplicate structures for the different market places.
Funding and ownership
No implications, entities need to be setup in EU.
Location
Detailed analysis needed to determine optimum location, considerations would be regulatory approval and regulatory environment,
costings including taxation, taxation obligations, costs post transfer and language.
Tax and customs
Taxation driven by location of new setup. ManCos will need to consider the “Attribution of Management Fees” between the newly
established/appointed Irish ManCo and the UK and/or US ManCo that will continue to perform certain functions delegated to it.
Future growth
Continued growth of Super ManCo entities.
Moderator:
Panellists:
irishfunds.ie
Fund Distribution & Market Access in
Europe
Lorcan Murphy, Acolin
David Skelding, Spokes Advisory
Anne Marie Thurston, Nuveen
Paul Nunan, Link Fund Solutions