Upload
andres-chinn
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Welcome to I-TECH HIV/AIDS Clinical Seminar Series
29 July, 2010Adapting Standard Clinical Guidelines to the
Context of HIV-Related Patient Care in Resource-Constrained Settings
Ian Crozier, MD and Paula Brentlinger, MD
First, thanks to our collaborators and funders!
Collaborators:
Mozambique (I-TECH, Ministry of Health, CDC, others):
Paul Thottingal, Mark Micek, Oliver Bacon, José Vallejo, Rui Bastos, Rolanda Manuel, Pilar Martínez, Florindo Mudender, Maria Ruano, Monica Negrete, and others!
Uganda (IDCAP, IDI, Accordia, I-TECH, Uganda MOH): Ann Miceli, Marcia Weaver, Allan Ronald, Mike Scheld, Lydia Mpanga Sebuyira, Kelly Willis.
Funders:
Mozambique: President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
Uganda: Accordia Global Health Foundation
Today’s plan
• Scope of project• Context: task-shifting• Justification for guideline development in
Mozambique • Process of guideline development in
Mozambique• Use of guidelines in health worker training and
evaluation in Mozambique• Adaptation of process for use in Uganda• Challenges, next steps
A 5-year initiative (so far...)
Mozambique:2005-6: Definition of problem2006-7: Consultations with Ministry of Health, development of draft guidelines and curricula
2007-8: Review and revision; scope of work conference; initial field test of new guideline-based curriculum2009-present: MOH approval; nationwide rollout
Uganda: 2009-10: Adaptation and expansion of guidelines. 2010: Rollout in setting of randomized controlled trial
Context: task-shifting in sub-Saharan Africa
A simple (?) case
• Imagine that you are a mid-level clinician in sub-Saharan Africa, seeing an HIV+ adult patient whose hemoglobin level is 7.7 g/dL.
• What should you do first to address this patient’s anemia?
• Why?
TYPE YOUR ANSWERS NOW!
Simple (?) case 2
• Now, imagine that you are a mid-level clinician in sub-Saharan Africa seeing an HIV+ adult patient whose axillary temperature is 38.5° C.
• What should you do first to address this patient’s fever?
• Why?
TYPE YOUR ANSWERS NOW!
Quick review of your answers
What: Danger sign check
History
Physical examination
DDx
Lab
Diagnosis? Classification?
Treatment
Why: Evidence, resources, guidelines, habit...
Mozambique, 2005-6: Dueling Guidelines, Anemia
1. Check for “general danger signs”. 2. If a patient seems pale, give ferrous sulfate,
mebendazole, and 1st line antimalarials (no laboratory testing needed). If extremely pale, refer.
3. If the anemic patient is on zidovudine, grade the adverse drug reaction and treat accordingly.
4. If the patient with severe malaria has a hemoglobin <5 g/dL, transfuse.
Mozambique, 2005-6: Dueling Guidelines, Fever
1. Check for “general danger signs”.
2. Give antimalarials (no lab tests required); add antibiotics if very sick.
3. Lumbar puncture; send for gram stain, AFB, india ink, VDRL
4. Consider adverse drug reaction to antiretrovirals; grade and treat accordingly
5. If severe malaria, give quinine; if uncomplicated malaria, give 1st line
What to do?
Options:
1.Pick one of the many competing guidelines and stick to it?
2.Adopt existing guidelines from other countries/sources?
3.Write new guidelines?
ARV-related Abdominal Pain Management Flow Chart
Patient developsabdominal pain on
ARVs
ARV related
Pancreatitis (dueto ddI or d4T)
Hepatitis (due toNVP, EFZ, AZT,
KTA)
Hyperlactatemia(on d4T, ddI, or
AZT)Ingestion related
Usually withnausea, vomiting,
epigastric pain
Measure serumamylase
Refer to hospital &hold ARVs
May have yelloweyes, light stool,
nausea, RUQ pain
Measure ALT
ALT 1.1 -2 XULN
Repeat ALT in 1-2weeks
ALT>2XULN
Consult expertabout stopping
ARVs
Jaundiceregardless of ALT
level
Stop allnon-emergentmedications
Refer promptly tohospital
Amylase elevated
Nausea, vomiting,bloating, ordistention
Measure venous lactate(no tourniquet, place on ice
immediately)
Lactate 2-5 mm/L
Measureelectrolytes
Consult expert
Lactate>5 mm/L
Measureelectrolytes
Stop all ARVs
Refer to hospitalimmediately
Occurs within 1 h ofingestion, crampy, &
goes away
Try taking withfood (unless ddI)
Not ARV related
If no relief, consultexpert
Characteristics of new Mozambican guidelines
Topics: Common signs or symptoms (patient-based, not disease-based)
Patient evaluation: Directed, based on history, physical examination, and use of available tests (malaria, HIV, AFB, hemoglobin)
Differential diagnosis: Emphasize common illnesses that can be diagnosed and treated with available resources within approved scope of practice of target cadre (more complex problems to be referred upward)
Layout: 1 page, easy to read, parallel organization for different guidelines
General: evidence based, consistent with major local (TB, malaria, AIDS, antenatal care programs) and international guidelines (IMAI etc) whenever possible, harmonize disease-specific guidelines whenever possible
°
1. HIV+ patient with axillary T>=37.5° C or history of fever.
2. Check for danger signs (convulsions, meningismus, coma, lethargy, other changes in behavior or mental status, intense headache, unable to eat, drink or walk, severe abdominal pain, respiratory distress)
3. If danger signs present: stabilize, admit or refer
4. If no danger signs, look for causes of fever: complete history, physical exam, malaria testing.
5. Malaria test(s) negative. 6. Malaria test(s) positive. Treat for malaria. If an additional cause of fever is also present, treat it as well.
7. If cause of fever known (or strongly suspected), initiate appropriate treatment or request studies.
8. If no cause detected, start antibiotics. If no improvement in 48 hours and cause still uncertain, add antimalarials.
9. If worse, or if not better in 2 to 7 days, see chronic fever algorithm.
Técnico de medicina algorithm for acute fever.
°
1. HIV+ patient with signs or symptoms of anemia (fatigue, weakness, dyspnea, pallor, bleeding, or hemoglobin <10g/dL)
2. Check for danger signs (shock, cardiac failure, severe pallor, active bleeding, surgical abdomen, obstetrical emergency, and/or hemoglobin < 5.0 g/dL)
3. If danger signs present: stabilize, admit or refer
4,5. If no danger signs, confirm presence of anemia. Check hemoglobin; compare to previous results if available. If bleeding without danger signs, treat per Mozambican norms in addition to remainder of algorithm.
6. Anemia confirmed (Hb <10 g/dL and not increasing, or decreasing. Test for malaria.
7. Anemia not confirmed: Hb >=10g/dL, or <10 g/dL but rising. Look for other causes of the patient’s symptoms.
8. Malaria test(s) negative. Check CBC. Review medication history (CTX, AZT, other medications that could cause anemia?)
9. Malaria test positive. Treat for malaria.
12. Adverse drug reaction unlikely. Give ferrous sulfate and folic acid or B complex for 1 month, ITN, nutritional counseling, single dose albendazole if not treated recently. Follow up in 1 month.
Técnico de medicina algorithm for anemia.
14. Anemia improved (Hb increase >=1 g/dL. Continue FeS04 for 3 months.
11. CBC: Leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia. Refer. 10. CBC: Isolated anemia.
13. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) possible. See ADR guidelines.
15. Anemia worse or not improved. Refer for consideration of ART initiation and for investigation of other causes.
Integration of new guidelines and curricula
Modules/sessions in both in-service and pre-service curricula corresponded to guideline topics (e.g. “diarrhea”, “weight loss”, “cough or dyspnea”).
Evidence supporting guideline development (epidemiologic, health-outcomes) summarized in curricula.
Stepwise presentation of guidelines.In-class case studies to be solved using guidelines;
generally, >=1 case presentation per guideline arm.Writing cases helped us spot guideline flaws, and
drove revisions!
Sample case-study questions
• Which guideline or guidelines should you use to address this case, and why?
• Does this patient have danger signs, or can you proceed to the next steps of the guideline?
• Which pathway should you take next (e.g. Box x or Box y), and why?
• Can you manage this patient with the guideline, or do you need to refer?
Use of guidelines in practicum sessions
Similarly, in practicum sessions (or post-course mentoring/supervision):
Trainees practice using guidelines to manage real patients.
Faculty/supervisors use guidelines as standard for evaluation of trainee performance
(Digression into textbook publishing)
Shift context Uganda
IDCAPRCT studying the most cost-
effective way to build capacity for the care
and prevention of infectious diseases
among mid-level providers in Uganda
Context: the training design
Classroom On-site
Context: the curriculum goal
Develop training materials that:o INTEGRATE infectious diseases training
(with emphasis on HIV/TB/malaria and common others)
ouse a CASE-BASED approach to frame key content
oTARGET mid-level providers at the health center IV level in Uganda
A 35 yo woman with fever:
After triaging (no danger signs), a careful history and physical examination reveals no localizing signs or symptoms to suggest an obvious cause of fever. The malaria smear is negative.
What should you do?
Should you:
• Give an antimalarial?• Give an antibiotic?• Give symptomatic treatment with f/up only?• Stop or start any other medicines?• Refer for further testing or care?
What criteria impact these decisions? Does it make a difference if the patient is HIV-infected or not? Using cotrimoxazole? Pregnant? On TB treatment?
An HIV-infected mother gives birth to a healthy child in Uganda…
• What routine important evaluation, prevention, and care should occur immediately?
• What routine important evaluation, prevention, and care should occur over the next 12-18 months?
The hunter in pursuit of an elephant does not stop to throw stones at birds…….
Similar issues in Uganda:
• “Dueling” clinical guidelines (HIV/TB/Malaria),
• Guidelines often either – Impractical for MLPs at the HC IV level (i.e.
incorporate unavailable laboratory testing, etc), or– Leave no “room” for MLP skill in clinical
evaluation, reasoning, and decision-making
• In some clinical scenarios, no clear guidelines
Focus on the important clinical decisions…
• Prescriptive (when possible)
• Practical tool for day-to day clinical use and consultation
• Effective for classroom and on-site clinical mentoring
Clinical Decision-Making Guide(s)
Anatomy
• Introduction: rationale and how-to-use
• Clinical decision-making guides (CDG): clinical algorithms plus explanatory notes
• Appendix tools: useful existing clinical reference material(s)
Types of decision-making
• Evaluation and management of new signs/symptoms (“unknowns”)
• Routine case management in HIV, TB, malaria
Section: common clinical problems
Section: HIV and ART
Section: routine case mgt
Emphasizing:• Correct case-definitions and classification• Correct pre-treatment evaluation/preparation• Correct identification of those who require
consultation/referral prior to initiation of Rx• Correct selection/dosing of specific and supportive Rx• Correct monitoring for AE and treatment effectiveness
Development of the CDGs
Guides constructed around important clinical decision-making 1. Identifying the important clinical decisions that may
need to be made in a patient with _________.2. Identifying the information needed to make these
decisions? (this informs and focuses the clinical evaluation).
3. Identifying and outlining the criteria by which key decisions are made?
4. Representing this process in a graphical format (with explanatory notes AND referencing appendix tables)
Principles of the CDGs (Uganda)
• RECOMMENDATIONS for decision-making in particular clinical scenarios
• Sourced from national guidelines whenever possible (then relevant local/regional scientific literature, int’l GL, expert opinion)
• Designed to integrate decision-making in multiple populations when possible
• Supplement to the core training material but real “rollout” in distance learning and booster sessions
Classroom On-site
FOCUS
Classroom On-site
Characteristics of new Mozambican (IDCAP) guidelines
Topics: Common signs or symptoms (patient-based, not disease-based)
Patient evaluation: Directed, based on history, physical examination, and use of available tests (malaria, HIV, AFB, hemoglobin)
Differential diagnosis: Emphasize common illnesses that can be diagnosed and treated with available resources within approved scope of practice of target cadre (more complex problems to be referred upward)
Layout: 1 page, easy to read, parallel organization for different guidelines
General: evidence based, consistent with major local (TB, malaria, AIDS, antenatal care programs) and international guidelines (IMAI etc) whenever possible, harmonize disease-specific guidelines whenever possible
Mozambique Uganda: key differences
1. Context: designed for use in RCT of 2 different approaches to MLP training in UG.
2. Target pop’n: address HIV+ and HIV- adults and children
3. Layout: extensive footnoting and appendix references
4. (?) link to trainee performance evaluation....
Measuring trainee performance
• As part of the study, PB was tasked with design and creation of a set of “case scenarios” to accurately assess and capture trainee performance in clinical evaluation, reasoning, and management.
• Forced identification of the key “testable” skills LINKED to core training material
• This process was one of the prime drivers of the development and adaptation of the IDCAP guides…
Gaps and challenges (1)
Related to national or international policy:
1. The dueling algorithm problem does not originate locally – some
guidelines originate in Geneva or the US or European headquarters of locally active aid agencies.
2. Constant evolution of scope of work of non-physician clinicians (can they do lumbar punctures? Can they prescribe 2nd line antiretrovirals or TB drugs?). Required national consensus conference in Mozambique.
Related to the scientific evidence base:
1. Constant evolution of published evidence base drives frequent revisions of international (WHO, PEPFAR, etc) standards.
2. Still, many lacunae in evidence base (Which antimalarials can be given safely and effectively to patient s on ART + TB treatment? Is visceral leishmaniasis an important contributor to anemia in province x? )
Gaps and challenges (2)
Related to the complexities of patient care in resource-constrained settings:
1. Some common problems have not been amenable to guideline development (e.g. abdominal pain, overlapping adverse drug reactions in patients on ART + multiple other agents)
2. Lack of resources (laboratory, imaging, surgeons, drugs) is a serious constraint to construction of an effective approach to some clinically important problems (e.g. altered level of consciousness)
3. Use of guidelines in patients with multiple active comorbidities.
Priorities for the future
1. Validation of new guidelines (studies about to commence in Mozambique [Vanderbilt University])
2. Workable plan for frequent revision as evidence base and local/international policies evolve
More gaps/challenges (Uganda)
• In an expanded target population, unique challenges in designing and integrating guides with current models that are variably implemented (especially under 5’s and IMCI)
• Less “mature” in the development process: more adaptation/refining of guides required, preferably in growing partnerships (MOH, etc)
African proverb
The hunter in pursuit of an elephant does not stop to throw stones at birds…..
What is the elephant?Are we in pursuit?
Questions???
Thank you!
Welcome to I-TECH HIV/AIDS Clinical Seminar Series
Next session: 5 August, 2010Listserv: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Welcome to I-TECH HIV/AIDS Clinical Seminar Series
Next session: 5 August, 2010Zied Mhirsi, MD
Nouvelles et découvertes: La conférence internationale sur le Sida à Vienne