24
9/6/2011 GG711, Fall 2011 1 Map of the global mid-ocean ridge system. So ut h ea s t Indian Rid ge P a c i f i c A n t ar c t ic Rid ge S ou th w e s t In di an R i d g e C arlsber g Ridge Central Indian Ridge Red Sea C hi l e Ri s e M i d A tl a n t i c R i d g e ( M A R ) E as t Pacific Rise Ju an de Fuc a Ri dge Gorda R id ge Galapago s Week 2 - Ocean Ridge Volcanism outline: Ridge structure and terminology. segmentation Locus of volcanism width of neovolcanic zone fissure vs point source constructs volcanic/tectonic histories Eruptions frequency, style and size along axis variations Magma chamber depth brief mention of lava chemistry more about Submarine forms and Effusion rate

Week 2 - Ocean Ridge VolcanismOcean Ridge Slow spreading ridges like the Mid-Atlantic Ridge can have vertical relief of up to a 1000m at the axial valley. Fast-Spreading Mid-Ocean

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 1

Map of the global mid-ocean ridge system.

Southeast Indian Ridge

Pacif ic A n tarctic

Ridge

S outhw

e stIndian

R idge

Carlsber gRidge

CentralIndianRidge

RedSea

Chile

Rise

MidAtla ntic

Rid

ge(M

A R)

Eas t

Pac

ific R

ise

Juan

de

Fuca

Ri d

ge

Gorda

Rid

ge

Galapa

gos

Week 2 - Ocean Ridge Volcanism

outline:

Ridge structure and terminology. segmentation

Locus of volcanism

width of neovolcanic zone

fissure vs point source constructs

volcanic/tectonic histories

Eruptions

frequency, style and size

along axis variations

Magma chamber depth

brief mention of lava chemistry

more about Submarine forms and Effusion rate

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 2

www.divediscover.whoi.edu/ridge/

Slow-Spreading Mid-Ocean RidgeSlow spreading ridges like the Mid-Atlantic Ridge can have vertical relief of up to a 1000m at the axial valley.

Fast-Spreading Mid-Ocean Ridgelike the EPR. The axial trough is 10s of m deep, as are the fault scarps.

Macdonald et al. 2001, Fig 2

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 3

Clipperton FZ

Lamont Seamounts

9 ° 30’ N OSC

9° 03’ N OSC

East Pacific Rise at 9° to 10° N

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 4

First-order segments are hundreds of kilometers long, persist for millions to tens of millions of years and are bounded by relatively permanent, rigid-plate transform faults. The underlying processes differ somewhat in fast- and slow-spreading centers.

These segments are sub-divided into several second- or third-order segments, bounded by a variety of non-rigid discontinuities. These smaller segments lengthen, shorten, or even disappear in 10 million to 100,000 years, respectively.

At the finest scale, fourth-order segments, about 10 kilometers long, may survive for only 100 to 10,000 years. These segments are the products of dike intrusion events, the fundamental units of crustal creation.

Exploring The Global Mid-Ocean Ridge, Oceanus, 1998

The segmented architecture of Mid-ocean ridges.

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 5

Segment boundaries and Mid-ocean ridge axis depth

crustal magmatic processes associated with ridge segmentation

● Transform fault effect

● Rift propagation effects

Dec

reas

ing

mag

ma

tem

per

atu

re

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 6

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 7

discontinuities

Sea floor

Sea floor

Magma chamber top

discontinuities

Zone of volcanic construction at ridges is more inflated at most segment centers (shallower depth, wider)

incr

easi

ng

mag

ma

tem

per

atu

re

Macdonald 2001

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 8

FAST SLOW

Macdonald 2001

wrong

Macdonald 2001

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 9

magma differentiation signaturesRubin and Sinton, 2007

cold hot

Spreading rate

morphological signaturesSmall, 1998

Each data point is a ridge section mean of 50-1000 points

11000+ MORB glasses (major elements)2100 glasses + whole rocks (majors/traces/isotopes)Mostly from PetDB plus some literature not yet there

Data manipulation basics:• 37 ridge “sections” – 50 to 500 samples in each• No hot spot influenced MORB• No off axis lavas (4% of PetDB)• Rejection of bad data (1.6%)

Global variations in MORB composition (away from hot spots)

Spreading rate is a proxy for time averaged melt-supply

Hot spotinfluence

Perfit and Chadwick, 1998, Fig 5

Backscatter maps:

A. “Rough” topography common at slow spreading (i.e. low melt supply)

B. and C.Rough and smooth examples at intermediate spreading rate

D. Smooth crust at fast spreading rate

A

C

B

D

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 10

Global distribution of submarine hydrothermal vent sites (above) and areas of survey coverage (right), Baker and German, 2004.

Neovolcanic zone (NVZ):

Most active volcanism occurs here.

Width increases as spreading rate decreases

Volcanic style transitions from fissure fed to more point source as width increases

Crustal textures vary appropriately

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 11

Perfit and Chadwick, 1998, Plate 1

Slow.more point source constructs and wider NeoVolcanic Zone

Fast.more continuous volcanic source and rarer point-source constructs in the NVZ

point-source constructs (aka volcanic sea mounts) outside the “neo-volcanic zone” are aligned with plate motion

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 12

Deeper magma bodies at slower spreading.Also, no steady state melt lens in magma chambers at low spreading rate but yes at faster rates (Sinton and Detrick, 1992)

Shallower = more differentiated

Deeper = less differentiated

Magma supply variations cause predictable links between magma chamber depth and magma chemistry

Rubin and Sinton 2007; Rubin et al., 2009

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 13

Shallower = more differentiated

Deeper = less differentiated

more magma chamber depth and magma chemistry

Spreading rate

Shallow

Deep

Magma Temp.

HOTTER(less differentiated)

COOLER(more differentiated)

AM

C D

epth

AM

C d

epth

Spreading rate

HOTTER

COOLER

Mag

ma

Tem

p.

+

=

High Magma Supply (e.g., faster spreading) = shallower chamber

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 14

Petrologic Model for Crustal Formation On the East Pacific Rise 9°- 10° N

Modified from Perfit et al. (1994)

Melt lens

EPR 9°- 10° N SEISMIC MODEL (Dunn et al. 2000)

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 15

Passive Flow Model for Melt Delivery to the Northern East Pacific Rise

Schematic Geology of the EPR

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 16

Nested

Surveys

Increasinglyhigher resolution

What can mapping tell us?

Topography

Lava Flow Surface types

Faulting

Axial collapse Troughs in Young Volcanic Terrain

Sheet and Lobate lava flows

No Rift ValleyShallow Fault Scarps

Off-axis Pillow Mounds

Abyssal Hill Formation2-3 km from Axis

Focused Venting

9°-10° N Ridge Crest Characteristics

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 17

Tectonomagmatic Model for AST Development

Volcanic-tectonic cycles:

periodicity and relative intensity vary throughout the ridge system as a rough function of magma supply and spreading rate

Volcanic and Tectonic Interpretation of DSL-120A Sidescan Data

(Fornari, Soule, Escartin et al., work in progress)

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 18

Subaerial lava channel issuing from a small vent

Off-axis lava channel complex

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 19

(Fornari, Soule, Escartin et al., work in progress)

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 20

Integrating sidescan interpretation, detailed mapping and sampling, with geochemistry and petrology.

From Soule et al. 2005 G3

Crustal and MagmaticEvolution

lava composition distribution. We’ll discuss this more later.

Some questions for now:

Are variations spatial or temporal or both?

What causes the variations in chemistry:

Surficial processes: flow differentiation? Vapor contamination

Magma chamber processes? Crustal plumbing? melt lens segmentation?

Different mantle sources? Depleted vs Enriched

Variable extents/depths of melting?

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 21

K/TiMgO

We learn a lot about volcanic crustal accretion by studying volcanic deposits from individual eruptions

We’ll return to this topic to discuss some of these later in the semester, but here are a few generalizations

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 22

Lava flow morphology

Perfit and Chadwick, 1998, Fig 8

Generally higher effusion rate

Generally lower effusion rate

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 23

Sinton et al., 2002, JGR

-Some trends with magma supply (spreading rate), but the relationships are not likely not statistically significant

-at the present rate of progress it will probably take a few centuries before the data are sufficient to be truly meaningful

he

tero

gen

eity

ind

ex

1

2

3

4

0 20 40 60

1996 N. Gorda

ODP

N. Cleft

1993 CoAxial

Serocki

BBQ

> 11 analyses per flow except "ODP" flow (8 analyses).

Almost all BBQ and Cleft Mounds heterogeneity is on LLDs

Most Gorda and Serocki flow heterogeneity is in parental magmas

flow volume (10 m )6 3

Heterogeneities of some MORB flows/flow sequencesRubin, Smith, Perfit, Sacks, Christie (1998) Deep Sea Res. II, 45

Cleft Mounds

9/6/2011

GG711, Fall 2011 24

1

2

3

4

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Compositional Heterogeneity and

Spreading Rate

More heterogeneity atslower spreading.

more compositional heterogeneity in largevolume lava flows.

Also recall the previous slide showing

Both are consistent with:

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-1

100

0 6020 40

Perfit & Chadwick (1998)

MAR

JdF/Gorda

100

N-EPR

80

Full Spreading Rate (mm/yr)

he

tero

ge

nei

ty i

nd

ex

Eru

pte

d V

olu

me

(km

3 )(Rubin et al., 2001, EPSL)

Small, early data set, but generally larger eruptions at slower spreading rate …and generally more compositionally variable eruptions at slower spreading rate