Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Webinar:
HOW TO TACKLE
ASC 842 IMPLEMENTATION
Lease Accounting Implementation
Lessons from the Front Lines
Page 1© 2019 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
Webinar Logistics
• Video Replay Slides Will Be Available for Download
on Website
• Q & A Session Following Presentation.
• Ask Questions any time in the ON24 Panel (Lower
Right).
• Technical Difficulties? Visit:
www.leaseaccelerator.com/webinar-technical-
support
• No CPE Credit will be Offered
Page 2© 2019 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
Meet Today’s Presenters
Richard MelzerVice President
William AndreoniSenior Director
Jim SwanickManaging Director
How to Tackle ASC 842
ImplementationLease Accounting Lessons from the Front Lines March 26, 2019
Contents
– Overview of the New Lease Standard
– Data Gathering Challenges
– Overall Implementation Process Review
– Implementation Challenges and Unforeseen Issues
– Technology Considerations
– Example Lessee Walkthrough
– Tax Implications When Adopting
How Did We Get Here…..
Implementing the New Standard
Lessee
✓ Record and disclose a lease right-of-
use (ROU) asset for all leases
✓ Record and disclose a lease liability for
all leases
✓ Indirect Cost(s)
✓ New Policies, procedures, and controls
✓ Technology Impact
✓ New Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures
Lessor
✓ Largely unchanged from legacy GAAP
✓ New ASC 842 rules better align with ASC 606
(Rev Rec)
✓ No differences between lease of real-estate vs
other leases
✓ Improved consistency in terms used in guidance
for lessee and lessor
✓ Leveraged lease classification not retained for
leases that commence after effective date of
ASC 842
✓ Possible deferral of upfront revenue/profit if
control definition is not met
✓ Indirect Cost(s)
What happened?
ASC 842 is effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018
(public business and certain other
entities) and after December 15, 2019
for other entities. Early adoption is
permitted.
Other changes include:
• How you identify a lease that is
covered by ASC 842 (embedded
leases)
• Classifying a lease (no more bright
lines)
• Expanded disclosures on leases
Roadmap
Overall Implementation Process Overview
Our Model Four Phased Approach
✓ Monitor Guidance Updates
and implement accordingly
✓ Reassess lease vs buy
decision criteria
✓ Manage any significant
delta in lease agreements
and/or data (i.e. determine
if additional testing
required)
✓ On-going audit review
(internal and external)
✓ On-going trainings
Phase 4Ongoing
✓ Document and adopt new
data, process, policies,
systems, and control updates
✓ Calculate and process new
lease entries (e.g. ROU
asset, Lease Liability, etc.).
✓ Conduct mock exercises
and/or parallel exercises to
ensure proper implementation
✓ Formalize training for
departments and team
members impacted by
updates
✓ Implement required financial
reporting disclosures
Phase 3Implementation
✓ Evaluate lease contracts under
new guidance (i.e.
classification, lease vs non-
lease, etc.)
✓ Evaluate unique lease
transactions (e.g. sale
leasebacks, etc.) under new
guidance
✓ Design data, process, and
disclosures for financial
statements
✓ Determine updates: Policies
and Procedures, Systems, and
Controls
✓ Confirm final design with all
relevant project stakeholders
Phase 2Design/Evaluation
✓ Establish project plan and cross-
functional team (and steering
committee)
✓ Identify lease agreements
✓ Identify current Policies and
Procedures
✓ Identify and evaluate current
technology capabilities and
assimilate a solution (update
current framework vs acquire
new)
✓ Identify data requirements for
footnotes
✓ Confirm approach with auditors
Phase 1Discovery
Data Gathering Issues
Observations from the transition period
Implementing the new Standard
Lease Evaluation Process
How do we get there….
9
✓ Current project focus is on identifying all leases
✓ Standard leases including sub-leases (buildings, equipment, furniture etc.)
✓ Embedded leases (service contracts, supply agreements, contract manufacturing agreements)
✓ Nature of Leases
✓ Significant Assumptions
and judgements
✓ Policy elections
✓ Various other
Disclose
Identify
✓ Identified Asset
✓ Substantially all
economic benefits
✓ Control of Asset
Classify
✓ Finance Lease
✓ Operating Lease
✓ Right of Use Asset
✓ Lease Liability
Measure✓ BS – ROU Asset and Lease
Liability
✓ IS – Front loaded finance
lease vs straight-line
operating
✓ CF – Operating vs Finance
Recognize
Key Objective of Phase 1: Identify a complete population of leases.
The Company’s methodology in achieving this objective is:
✓ Identify all of the Company’s physical locations
✓ Identify appropriate individuals responsible for overseeing each physical location and understand
the lease activity at or around each physical location
✓ Obtain and review a reciprocal population to identify potential leases (e.g. vendor listing and/or
expense detail)
✓ Compile lease confirmations and information by department/location (standard and embedded
leases) Explicit leases (confirmation form process)
✓ Embedded leases (supply chain and information technology)
✓ Perform reconciliation between:
✓ Lease information from confirmation process, and;
✓ Lease information disclosed in financial statements
Where do we start….
How is Company Going to Comply with New Standard?
The new ASC 842 standard applies to leases of property, plant and equipment.
The guidance does not apply to the following:
✓ Leases of intangible assets (ASC 350)
✓ Leases to explore for or use minerals, oil, natural gas and similar non-regenerative resources,
including the intangible rights to explore for those natural resources and rights to use the land
in which those natural resources are contained (unless those rights of use include more than
the right to explore for resources)
✓ Leases of equipment used to explore for natural resources are not part of this scope
exception
(i.e., they are in scope of ASC 842)
✓ Leases of biological assets, including timber
✓ Leases of inventory
✓ Leases of assets under construction
✓ Arrangements within the scope of ASC 853 - Service Concession Arrangements
Leasing Guidance Overview: Scope Exceptions
Leasing Guidance Overview: Practical Expedients
Practical expedient:
Hindsight
Practical expedient:
Package (identification,
classification and initial
direct cost):
Accounting Policy:
Portfolio approach
Accounting Policy:
Lease vs. non-lease
components
(Lessee)
Accounting Policy:
Short-term lease
An entity may elect the
following practical
expedients, which must be
elected as a package and
applied consistently by an
entity to all of its leases
(including those for which
the entity is a lessee or a
lessor), when applying the
pending content that links
to this paragraph to leases
that commenced before the
effective date:
1. An entity need not
reassess whether any
expired or existing
contracts are or contain
leases.
2. An entity need not
reassess the lease
classification for any
expired or existing
leases.
3. An entity need not
reassess initial direct
costs for any existing
leases.
An entity also may elect a
practical expedient, which
must be applied consistently
by an entity to all of its leases
(including those for which the
entity is a lessee or a lessor)
to use hindsight in
determining the lease term
(that is, when considering
lessee options to extend or
terminate the lease and to
purchase the underlying
asset) and in assessing
impairment of the entity’s
right-of-use assets. This
practical expedient may be
elected separately or in
conjunction with either one or
both of the practical
expedients in (f) and (gg).
As a practical expedient, a
lessee may, as an
accounting policy election
by class of underlying
asset, choose not to
separate non-lease
components from lease
components and instead to
account for each separate
lease component and the
non-lease components
associated with that lease
component as a single
lease component.
The Board decided to
explicitly state that lessees
and lessors are permitted
to apply the leases
guidance at a portfolio
level. The cost relief also
could be particularly high
for certain aspects of the
leases guidance for which
entities need to make
judgments and estimates,
such as determining the
discount rate or
determining and
reassessing the lease term.
For example, rather than
establishing a specific
discount rate for a single
leased asset, an entity
might conclude that it can
establish a single discount
rate applied to all leases in
a portfolio because using
that discount rate would not
result in a materially
different answer than using
a discount rate determined
for each.
As an accounting policy, a
lessee may elect not to apply
the recognition requirements
in this Subtopic to short-term
leases. Instead, a lessee may
recognize the lease payments
in profit or loss on a straight-
line basis over the lease term
and variable lease payments
in the period in which the
obligation for those payments
is incurred (consistent with
paragraphs 842-20-55-1
through 55-2). The accounting
policy election for short-term
leases shall be made by class
of underlying asset to which
the right of use relates
Where are the issues….
How is the Company going to Ensure Completeness?
Key Risk: A complete population of leases is not properly identified during the lease gathering
phase, yielding an incorrect transition adjustment and disclosures
Lessee Considerations
✓ Checks and Recs to technology platform, etc.
✓ Data analytics and metrics for reasonableness
✓ Lessor Considerations
✓ Understand and evaluate procedures performed during implementation of ASC 606 –
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
✓ Survey Key Individuals to confirm assessment results
Financials GL SearchInternal
Certifications
Lease
Completeness
Lessons Learned
Implementation Pitfalls and Unforeseen Issues
Lessons Learned
…..while Implementing New Standards
All
departments
may be
impacted!
Technology
is Critical
Evaluation
is on-going,
not a point in
time
Interpretations
will vary, even
within audit
firms
No one is an
expert
Project planning
& milestones
Dedicated team to
implement
Document,
Document,
Document!
Meeting with
auditors should be
“early and
frequent”
❖ Not Just a Compliance Project✓ Lease standard compliance
promotes a variety of valuable by
projects
✓ Compliance
✓ Operational Optimizations
❖ New GAAP Exposed Old Errors✓ Accounting
✓ Control Environment
✓ Technology
✓ Financial Reporting
❖ Valuable By-products✓ Improved Communication (Push and
Pull)
✓ Accounting
✓ Control Environment
✓ Financial Reporting
Lessons Learned:
New Lease Standard
Incremental Borrowing Rate
Leasing Guidance Overview
17
ASC 842 Defines IBR as follows:
“The rate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to
borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term an
amount equal to the lease payments in a similar
economic environment.”
Incremental Borrowing Rate
Leasing Guidance Overview
18
✓ At lease commencement, a lessee measures the lease liability at the present value of the lease payments not yet paid using the discount rate for the lease
✓ The discount rate used in the present value calculation should be the “rate implicit in the lease” whenever that rate is readily determinable
✓ If it is not readily determinable, which we expect to be the case in most instances, lessees use the incremental borrowing rate (IBR)
✓ Non-public business entities may elect to use a risk-free rate
✓ The discount rate should be determined on a lease-by-lease basis
** The rate must be reassessed if there is a change to the lease term or the assessment of whether the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise a purchase option, or if a modification occurs and it is not accounted for as a separate contract
A business may be impacted in the following areas:
✓ Debt Covenant Compliance
✓ Financial Statements Ratios
✓ Lease vs Buy Decisions
✓ Market Capitalization
✓ Credit Agency Ratings
The what….
Leasing - Business Impact from New Standard
✓ Real Estate – Rent vs Own Decisions
✓ Capital Requirements
✓ Control Environment
✓ Accuracy of Prior Reporting
✓ New Financial Reporting Disclosures
The what…..
New Lease Standard: Valuable Byproducts
Implementing the new lease standard can promote the following:
✓ Centralizing Lease Activity
✓ Lease vs Buying Decisions
✓ Competitive Financing
✓ Contract Negotiation Approach
✓ Lease contract T&C’s
** Opportunity to centralize and optimize through technology (during
adoption and post adoption)
✓Opportunities for MSA’s
✓Management of Evergreen Fees
✓Buyouts vs Renewals
✓Better tracking of Leased Assets
✓Physical location
Technology Considerations
System Impact and Considerations from New Standard
Companies will need to consider the following:
– Lease Types and Volume
– Structured and Unstructured Data
– Book vs Tax Differences
– Move away from Excel
– Nothing is 100% “out of the box”
– Plan for upgrades and maintenance
Volume UnstructuredComplexity High Risk of
Misstatement
– System Development Life Cycle
– IT should serve on Steering Committee
– Business and Technical Requirements (Use
Cases)
– Existing ERP System vs New Bolt On System
– Technology Vendor Analysis
23www.leaseaccelerator.com
ENTERPRISE LEASE ACCOUNTING
Comply with the new lease accounting
standards while also establishing a scalable
model for managing your lease portfolio.
SOLUTIONS FOR FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING
THE CONTROLLER’S
CHALLENGE
Page 24© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
The Controller’s Challenge
Creating an accurate, repeatable, global close process...
Page 25© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
The Controller’s Challenge
Started as an
Accounting
Problem
Creating an accurate, repeatable, global close process...
Page 26© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
The Controller’s Challenge
Became a Data
Problem
Creating an accurate, repeatable, global close process...
Page 27© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
The Controller’s Challenge
Now a Process
Transformation
Problem
Creating an accurate, repeatable, global close process...
28www.leaseaccelerator.com
ENTERPRISE LEASE ACCOUNTING
Comply with the new lease accounting
standards while also establishing a scalable
model for managing your lease portfolio.
SOLUTIONS FOR FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING
UNDERSTANDING
THE JOURNEY
Page 29© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
The Lease Accounting Journey
WE ARE
HERE
DAY
ONE
• Future State Design
• Data Collection & Cleansing
• Software Configuration & Testing
• Communications & Training
DAY
TWO
DAY
THREE
1
2
3
FINISH LINE
1/1/2019
Page 30© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
The Lease Accounting Journey
WE
ARE
HERE
STARTING LINE
DAY
ONE
• Future State Design
• Data Collection & Cleansing
• Software Configuration & Testing
• Communications & Training
DAY
TWO
• New Leases & End of Term
• Modifications & Reassessments
• Monthly Close & Quarterly Reports
• Substantive & Process Audit Preparation
DAY
THREE
• Competitive Sourcing of Financing
• Lease versus Buy Analysis
• End of Term and Evergreen Management
• KPIs & Stakeholder Scorecards
1
2
3
FINISH LINE
1/1/2019
Page 31© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
Decisions and Events Across the Lifecycle
Page 32© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
The Lease Accounting Journey
WE
ARE
HERE
STARTING LINE
DAY
ONE
• Future State Design
• Data Collection & Cleansing
• Software Configuration & Testing
• Communications & Training
DAY
TWO
• New Leases & End of Term
• Modifications & Reassessments
• Monthly Close & Quarterly Reports
• Substantive & Process Audit Preparation
DAY
THREE
• Competitive Sourcing of Financing
• Lease versus Buy Analysis
• End of Term and Evergreen Management
• KPIs & Stakeholder Scorecards
1
2
3
FINISH LINE
1/1/2019
The greatest risk and cost is here…
Page 33© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
WE
ARE
HERE
The Lease Accounting Journey
STARTING LINE
DAY
ONE
• Future State Design
• Data Collection & Cleansing
• Software Configuration & Testing
• Communications & Training
DAY
TWO
• New Leases & End of Term
• Modifications & Reassessments
• Monthly Close & Quarterly Reports
• Substantive & Process Audit Preparation
DAY
THREE
• Competitive Sourcing of Financing
• Lease versus Buy Analysis
• End of Term and Evergreen Management
• KPIs & Stakeholder Scorecards
1
2
3
FINISH LINE
1/1/2019
The greatest risk and cost is here…
…not here.
Page 34© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
The Lease Accounting Journey
WE
ARE
HERE
STARTING LINE
DAY
ONE
• Future State Design
• Data Collection & Cleansing
• Software Configuration & Testing
• Communications & Training
DAY
TWO
• New Leases & End of Term
• Modifications & Reassessments
• Monthly Close & Quarterly Reports
• Substantive & Process Audit Preparation
DAY
THREE
• Competitive Sourcing of Financing
• Lease versus Buy Analysis
• End of Term and Evergreen Management
• KPIs & Stakeholder Scorecards
1
2
3
FINISH LINE
1/1/2019
Leverage Technology to
Reduce RISK
Page 35© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
WE
ARE
HERE
The Lease Accounting Journey
STARTING LINE
DAY
ONE
• Future State Design
• Data Collection & Cleansing
• Software Configuration & Testing
• Communications & Training
DAY
TWO
• New Leases & End of Term
• Modifications & Reassessments
• Monthly Close & Quarterly Reports
• Substantive & Process Audit Preparation
DAY
THREE
• Competitive Sourcing of Financing
• Lease versus Buy Analysis
• End of Term and Evergreen Management
• KPIs & Stakeholder Scorecards
1
2
3
FINISH LINE
1/1/2019
Leverage Leasing
to Drive Savings
Page 36© 2017 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
The Lease Accounting Journey
WE
ARE
HERE
STARTING LINE
DAY
ONE
• Future State Design
• Data Collection & Cleansing
• Software Configuration & Testing
• Communications & Training
DAY
TWO
• New Leases & End of Term
• Modifications & Reassessments
• Monthly Close & Quarterly Reports
• Substantive & Process Audit Preparation
DAY
THREE
• Competitive Sourcing of Financing
• Lease versus Buy Analysis
• End of Term and Evergreen Management
• KPIs & Stakeholder Scorecards
1
2
3
FINISH LINE
1/1/2019
Compliance Driven
ROI
L E A D ING TA X D E PA RT MEN TS F O RWA RD
Tax Implications of ASC 842 Adoption
Jim Swanick
Managing Director
What We Wil l Cover
►Action Plan
►Lease Classification for Tax
►Accounting Methods
►Deferred Taxes for New Basis Differences
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 38
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 39
INFORMATION GATHERING ANALYSIS OF TAX ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION
❑ Coordination with the
accounting team
❑ ROU assets and lease
liabilities recorded
❑ Understand book vs tax
treatment of IDCs
❑ Understand book vs tax
treatment of income/
expense recognition
❑ Confirm tax classification
of leases
❑ Confirm tax accounting
methods for recognizing
income or expense
❑ Determine book vs tax
basis differences for ASC
740 purposes
❑ Record deferred taxes
❑ Accounting method
changes, if needed
❑ Establish processes,
controls, maintenance,
❑ Other – state
apportionment, franchise
taxes, sales taxes,
foreign locations, etc.
TACKLING THE TAX IMPLICATIONS
ASC 842 ACTION PLAN FOR TAX
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 40
LEASE CLASSIFICATION – TRUE LEASE VS SALE
True Lease Sale
Lessee Deduct Rent Payments Tax Depreciation
Interest Expense
Lessor Rent Income Gain on Sale
Tax Depreciation Interest Income
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 41
LEASE CLASSIFICATION – TRUE LEASE VS SALE
► A true lease exists if, based on the facts and circumstances, the lessor bears the risks and
rewards of ownership of the asset.
► Common factors which may indicate a sale rather than a lease:
» The lease contract contains a bargain purchase option
» The lease term covers a large part of the useful life
» There is nominal residual value at the end of the lease
» The agreement applies payments toward an equity interest
» You get title to the property after a certain # of payments
» Total payments are comparable to the purchase price
» You pay much more than the fair rental value
» The agreement designates part of the payments as interest
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 42
LEASE CLASSIFICATION – TRUE LEASE VS SALE
► IRS guidance:
» Rev. Rul. 55-540
» Rev. Proc. 75-21
» Rev. Proc. 2001-28
►Key court cases:
» Frank Lyon Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 561 (1978)
» Grodt & McKay Realty, Inc. v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1221 (1981)
» Estate of Thomas v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 412 (1985)
» Torres v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 702 (1987)
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 43
LEASE CLASSIFICATION – TRUE LEASE VS SALE
►A true lease exists if, based on the facts and circumstances, the lessor
bears the risks and rewards incident to ownership of the asset.
► IRS guidance:
» Rev. Rul. 55-540
» Rev. Proc. 75-21
» Rev. Proc. 2001-28
►Key court cases:
» Frank Lyon Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 561 (1978)
» Grodt & McKay Realty, Inc. v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1221 (1981)
» Estate of Thomas v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 412 (1985)
» Torres v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 702 (1987)
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 44
LEASE CLASSIFICATION – TRUE LEASE VS SALE
► Common factors which may indicate the contract is a sales contract
rather than a lease:
» The agreement applies payments toward an equity interest
» You get title to the property after a stated amount of payments
» Total payments are comparable to the purchase price
» You pay much more than the fair rental value of the property
» You have an option to buy the property at a nominal price
compared to the projected value of the property at the option
exercise date (e.g., bargain purchase option)
» The agreement designates part of the payments as interest
» The lease term covers a large part of the useful life of the asset
» The lessee has risk of loss
45
DEFERRED TAX ACCOUNTING
►Book versus Tax basis
» Under ASC 740, the establishment of a new right-of-use asset and related lease liability may cause a deferred tax asset (DTA) or deferred tax liability (DTL) to be recorded to the extent there is a different tax basis for such amounts
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 46
EXAMPLE 1 – TRUE LEASE FOR TAX / OPERATING LEASE
FOR BOOKS - NEW RULES (NO RENT INCREASES)
Payments
Book lease
liab.
(1-6)
Book ROU
(3-4)
Book
Amort Exp
(5-6)
Book Rent
Expense
(S/L)
Book Int
Exp
Tax Rent
Exp plus
amort of
costs
Bk/Tx
timing diff
(5-7)
Temp diff
Lease Liab
Temp Diff
ROU asset
Net Temp
Diff
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 15,000 (392,017) 407,017 392,017 (392,017) -
1 50,000 (362,094) 375,594 31,424 51,500 20,076 51,500 - 362,094 (362,094) -
2 50,000 (330,413) 342,413 33,180 51,500 18,320 51,500 - 330,413 (330,413) -
3 50,000 (296,874) 307,374 35,040 51,500 16,460 51,500 - 296,874 (296,874) -
4 50,000 (261,365) 270,365 37,009 51,500 14,491 51,500 - 261,365 (261,365) -
5 50,000 (223,772) 231,272 39,093 51,500 12,407 51,500 - 223,772 (223,772) -
6 50,000 (183,973) 189,973 41,300 51,500 10,200 51,500 - 183,973 (183,973) -
7 50,000 (141,837) 146,337 43,636 51,500 7,864 51,500 - 141,837 (141,837) -
8 50,000 (97,228) 100,228 46,109 51,500 5,391 51,500 - 97,228 (97,228) -
9 50,000 (50,000) 51,500 48,728 51,500 2,772 51,500 - 50,000 (50,000) -
10 50,000 (0) 0 51,500 51,500 0 51,500 - 0 (0) (0)
-
515,000 407,017 515,000 107,983 515,000
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 47
EXAMPLE 2 – TRUE LEASE FOR TAX / OPERATING LEASE
FOR BOOKS - NEW RULES (3% INCREASE PER YEAR)
Payments
Book lease
liab.
(1-6)
Book ROU
(3-4)
Book
Amort Exp
(5-6)
Book Rent
Expense
(S/L)
Book Int
Exp
Tax Rent
Exp plus
amort of
costs
Bk/Tx
timing diff
(5-7)
Temp diff
Lease Liab
Temp Diff
ROU asset
Net Temp
Diff
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 15,000 (443,212) 458,212 443,212 (443,212) -
1 50,000 (416,294) 422,474 35,738 58,819 23,082 51,500 7,319 416,294 (408,974) 7,319
2 51,500 (386,207) 385,068 37,406 58,819 21,413 53,000 5,819 386,207 (373,068) 13,139
3 53,045 (352,719) 345,806 39,263 58,819 19,557 54,545 4,274 352,719 (335,306) 17,413
4 54,636 (315,580) 304,484 41,322 58,819 17,497 56,136 2,683 315,580 (295,484) 20,096
5 56,275 (274,526) 260,885 43,598 58,819 15,221 57,775 1,044 274,526 (253,385) 21,140
6 57,964 (229,274) 214,778 46,107 58,819 12,712 59,464 (644) 229,274 (208,778) 20,496
7 59,703 (179,525) 165,913 48,866 58,819 9,954 61,203 (2,383) 179,525 (161,413) 18,113
8 61,494 (124,960) 114,022 51,891 58,819 6,928 62,994 (4,174) 124,960 (111,022) 13,938
9 63,339 (65,239) 58,819 55,202 58,819 3,617 64,839 (6,019) 65,239 (57,319) 7,919
10 65,239 (0) 0 58,819 58,819 0 66,739 (7,919) 0 (0) (0)
-
588,194 458,212 588,194 129,982 588,194
© Global Tax Management, Inc. | www.gtmtax.com 48
TAX ACCOUNTING METHODS
► Accounting method changes
» As part of adoption process, additional information may become available which could result in identification of improper accounting methods for tax purposes
► Rev. Proc. 2018-31 - automatic change for lease classification
» Change made using a cut-off method and thus only applies to transactions entered into on or after the beginning of the year of change. Thus, no section 481(a) adj required.
► Rev. Proc. 2015-13 – non-automatic change for lease classification
» Leases entered into before the beginning of the year of change.
» Such request will not be considered unless the proposed method of accounting is consistent with the method used by the counterparty to the lease agreement.
» No audit protection is provided for this nonautomatic method change.
Page 49© 2019 LeaseAccelerator Inc.
Questions
William AndreoniSenior Director
Pine Hill Group
Jim SwanickManaging Director
GTM
Richard MelzerVice President
LeaseAccelerator
THANK YOU!
For more information, visit:
www.leaseaccelerator.com | www.Pinehill.com | www.gtmtax.com