· Web view{ITRE}Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2018/0225(COD)

European Parliament2014-2019

Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

2018/0225(COD)

12.9.2018

AMENDMENTS231 - 564

Draft reportChristian Ehler(PE625.306v01-00)

Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation

Proposal for a decision(COM(2018)0436 – C8-0253/2018 – 2018/0225(COD))

AM\1159885EN.docx PE625.594v01-00

EN United in diversity EN

AM_Com_LegReport

PE625.594v01-00 2/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Amendment 231Barbara Kudrycka, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁukacijewskaDraft legislative resolutionCitation 5 a (new)

Draft legislative resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Parliament’s report on the assessment of Horizon 2020 implementation in view of its interim evaluation and the Framework Programme 9 proposal (2016/2147(INI))

Or. en

Amendment 232Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionRecital 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the Specific Programme, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to adopt work programmes for the implementation of the Specific Programme. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council4 .

(3) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the Specific Programme, delegated powers should be conferred to the Commission to adopt a Comprehensive Program and implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to adopt work programmes scheduled in the Comprehensive Programme for the implementation of the Specific Programme.

_________________4 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13)

Or. en

Amendment 233Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decision

AM\1159885EN.docx 3/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Recital 5


(5) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Specific Programme will contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 25 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under this Specific Programme are expected to contribute 35% of the overall financial envelope of the Specific Programme to climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the Specific Programme's preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes.

(5) Acknowledging climate change as one of the biggest and most important global and societal challenges, and reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Specific Programme will contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 50 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under the Specific Programme should contribute at least 50% of the overall financial envelope of the Specific Programme to the climate objective, in order to support actions or parts of actions that will help to deliver a net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emission economy by 2050 at the latest. Relevant actions will be identified ex-ante and fully reflected during the Specific Programme's preparation and implementation in form of the Strategic plan and work programmes, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes, thereby ensuring that the objective of investing at least 50% of the Programme's overall financial envelope to climate-related research and innovations achieved efficiently and in a timely manner.

Or. en

Justification

The 35% of ear-marking for climate expenditure of the Horizon budgetary envelope as propsed by the Commission only confirms the status quo of the current programme. Given that climate change is one of the biggest and most pressing global and societal challenges this will be insufficient. The transition towards reaching a net-zero greenhouse gas emission economy by 2050 at the latest needs to accelerate and an ambitious and well endowed RDI policy is the most important tool in order to achieve that.

Amendment 234Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionRecital 5PE625.594v01-00 4/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN



(5) Acknowledging climate change as one of the biggest and most important global and societal challenges, and reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Specific Programme will contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 30% of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under the Specific Programme should contribute at least 50% of the overall financial envelope of the Specific Programme to the climate objective, in order to support actions or parts of actions that will help to deliver a net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emission economy by 2050 at the latest. Relevant actions will be identified ex-ante and fully reflected during the Specific Programme's preparation and implementation inform of the Strategic plan and work programmes, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes, thereby ensuring that the objective of investing at least 50% of the Programme’s overall financial envelope to climate-related research and innovations achieved efficiently and in a timely manner.

Or. en

Amendment 235Jeppe Kofod, Theresa Griffin, Kathleen Van BremptProposal for a decisionRecital 5


(5) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Specific Programme will contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the

(5) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Specific Programme will contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the

AM\1159885EN.docx 5/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

achievement of an overall target of 25 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under this Specific Programme are expected to contribute 35% of the overall financial envelope of the Specific Programme to climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the Specific Programme's preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes.

achievement of an overall target of at least 30 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. At least 40% of the overall financial envelope of the Specific Programme must support actions or part of actions that will directly help to deliver on the EU’s commitments in the Paris Agreement, the 2030 climate and energy targets monitored by the Regulation [Governance of the Energy Union], and a net-zero greenhouse gas emissions economy by 2050. Relevant actions will be identified during the Specific Programme's preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes.

Or. en

Amendment 236Lieve Wierinck, Fredrick Federley, Carolina Punset, Angelika MlinarProposal for a decisionRecital 5



(5) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Specific Programme will contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 30 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under this Specific Programme are expected to contribute at least 35% of the overall financial envelope of the Specific Programme to climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the Specific Programme's preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes.

Or. en

PE625.594v01-00 6/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Justification

Besides the scientific, societal, economic and innovation impact, the programme should also monitor its progress in reaching the climate objectives. These objectives should be in line with the overall MFF target of 25% of the budget to tackle climate challenges. In order to stay within the boundaries reached in the Paris Agreement, the overall target of MFF of 25% of the budget should be increased. Hence, the budget allocated to the climate objectives in Horizon Europe should be at least 35%.

Amendment 237Martina WernerProposal for a decisionRecital 5



(5) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Specific Programme will contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 25 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under this Specific Programme are expected to contribute at least 35% of the overall financial envelope of the Specific Programme to climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the Specific Programme's preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes.

Or. en

Amendment 238Henna VirkkunenProposal for a decisionRecital 5


(5) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Specific Programme will contribute to

(5) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Specific Programme will contribute to

AM\1159885EN.docx 7/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 25 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under this Specific Programme are expected to contribute 35% of the overall financial envelope of the Specific Programme to climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the Specific Programme's preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes.

mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 25 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under this Specific Programme are expected to contribute at least 35% of the overall financial envelope of the Specific Programme to climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the Specific Programme's preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes.

Or. en

Amendment 239Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionRecital 5 a (new)


(5 a) As part of the annual reporting, in accordance with Article 45 [Regulation establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme], the Commission should carry, a robust consolidation exercise to identify whether the Programme’s climate expenditures is on track to achieve the 50 % target. The Commission should provide information on the scale and results of support to the climate change objectives, differentiating between mitigation and adaptation as well as provide information on the climate contribution of relevant financial instruments, and make this publicly available. In accordance with the Court of Auditor Report 31/2016, particular attention should be paid to the contribution by the bottom-up parts of the Programme, where the share of bottom-up actions that can be considered climate-related depends upon researcher proposals. If the Programme is achieving less than 50% climate-relevant spending, the Commission will respond either by requiring a sharper focus on climate in the Work Programmes of Pillar 2, by

PE625.594v01-00 8/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

soliciting climate-relevance in the proposals submitted under Pillar 1 or Pillar 3 or by moving budgets to parts of the Programme with proven climate-relevance from parts that are not.

Or. en

Justification

In accordance with the recommendation by the Court of Auditor report 31/2016, this amendment suggests a thorough monitoring and follow up of the climate expenditure target ensuring that the target indeed will be met.

Amendment 240Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco López, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Marisa Matias, Patrizia Toia, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionRecital 5 a (new)


(5 a) Horizon Europe gives high importance to the links between inclusive societies, R&I and societal challenges. The gender dimension is crucial to design inclusive societies as well as to produce responsible R&I, and constitutes a societal challenge in itself as stated in the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Gender impact should be addressed in any social and industrial transformation. This requires ensuring that gender will be appropriately integrated in all the instruments of Horizon Europe, from pillars, misions, clusters or international cooperation, to open science and open data.

Or. en

Amendment 241Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionRecital 5 a (new)


(5 a) Given the substantial negative impact of fossil fuels in fostering climate change, the Horizon Europe Programme

AM\1159885EN.docx 9/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

should commit to the phasing out of fossil fuel by not providing any financial support to activities or investments related to the production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels or any other activity that is detrimental to the climate and contradicts the EU’s commitment under the Paris Agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 242Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionRecital 5 b (new)


(5 b) Work programmes will state the percentage of their spending that they estimate is climate-relevant. The Commission will seek to understand any significant discrepancies with the aggregate estimate of climate-relevant spending made by beneficiaries.

Or. en

Justification

Linked to reasoning on recital 5a(new)

Amendment 243Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionRecital 5 c (new)


(5 c) Given the substantial negative impact of fossil fuels in fostering climate change, the Horizon Europe Programme should commit to the phasing out of fossil fuel by not providing any financial support to activities or investments related to the production,processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels or any other activity that is detrimental to the climate and contradicts the EU’s

PE625.594v01-00 10/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

commitment under the Paris Agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 244Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionRecital 6


(6) The Specific Programme's actions should be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value.

(6) The Specific Programme's actions should be used to reinforce, widen and extend the excellence of the Union's scientific and technological base, tackle major global societal challenges, improve people’s health, well-being, full integration into social and economic life and catalyse the transition towards a net-zero GHG emissions economy by 2050 at the latest combining the EU's industrial leadership and sustainability, and address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, such as neglected societal challenges, leveraging additional private and public funding rather than duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value. The Specific Programme's actions should be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value.

Or. en

Amendment 245Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁukacijewskaProposal for a decisionRecital 6


(6) The Specific Programme's actions should be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating

(6) The Specific Programme's actions should be used to reinforce, widen and extend Union's scientific and technological base, tackle major global

AM\1159885EN.docx 11/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value.

societal challenges, increase the Union's knowledge and industrial leadership, as well as address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, safeguarding clear European added value from R&I investments, fully using R&I potential of all Member States, without duplicating or crowding outprivate financing.

Or. en

Amendment 246Martina WernerProposal for a decisionRecital 6



(6) The Specific Programme's actions should be used to foster the Union's scientific and technological excellence in order to address global challenges, in particular climate change, foster the Union's industrial competitiveness and improve quality of life in the Union by addressing market failures or sub-optimal investment situations in a proportionate manner, avoiding duplicating or crowding out private financing;

Or. en

Amendment 247Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionRecital 6



(6) The Specific Programme's actions should be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value, thereby meeting global challenges while improving people's health, their well-being and their full economic and social integration.

PE625.594v01-00 12/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Or. it

Justification

It is important to make clear the European added value of initiatives under this programme.

Amendment 248Marisa Matias, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyProposal for a decisionRecital 6



(6) The Specific Programme's actions should be used to reinforce, widen and extend the excellence of the Union's scientific and technological base, tackle major global challenges, environment and economic sustainability and climate changes as well as to improve people's life namely through better employment, access to health and education, social inclusion, active citizenship.

Or. en

Amendment 249Henna VirkkunenProposal for a decisionRecital 6



(6) The Specific Programme's actions should be used to boost investments without duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value.

Or. en

Amendment 250Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco LópezProposal for a decisionRecital 6


(6) The Specific Programme's actions (6) The Specific Programme's actions

AM\1159885EN.docx 13/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

should be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value.

in the ‘Open Innovation’ pillar should be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value.

Or. en



(6 a) The Specific Programme should be implemented in a transparent, participatory and strategic multiannual planning process, through the mandatory involvement of stakeholders in defining priorities and the suitable types of action and forms of implementation, including missions and European Partnerships. Stakeholder representation should be balanced representing various background, such as the scientific community, research organisations, bodies with a public service mission at local, regional, national or international level, civil society organisations and the private sector, in particular SMEs.

Or. en



(6 b) Reflecting the low level of involvement of civil society representatives in Horizon 2020, this Horizon Europe shall ensure the involvement and the processes of consultation with civil society at all stages of preparing, programming, implementing

PE625.594v01-00 14/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

and evaluating the Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 253Seán Kelly, Mairead McGuinness, Brian Hayes, Deirdre CluneProposal for a decisionRecital 7


(7) Reflecting the important contribution that research and innovation should make to address challenges in food, agriculture, rural development and the bioeconomy, and to seize the corresponding research and innovation opportunities in close synergy with Common Agricultural Policy, relevant actions under the Specific Programme will be supported with EUR 10 billion for the cluster 'Food and Natural Resources' for the period 2021-2027.

(7) Reflecting the important contribution that research and innovation should make to address challenges in food, agriculture, rural development and the bioeconomy, and to seize the corresponding research and innovation opportunities in close synergy with Common Agricultural Policy, relevant actions under the Specific Programme will be supported with EUR 10 billion for the cluster 'Food and Natural Resources' for the period 2021-2027.Sustainable food production is vital for our future. EU entities are leading the development of innovative solutions to global challenges. An EU-led infrastructure for agri-food innovation will ensure European actors maintain competitive advantage while facilitating the transfer of knowledge, know-how and best practice globally, in line with the SDGs and the WTO Agreement TRIPS Article 66.2. This will be supported with €200 million from the Horizon budget.

Or. en

Justification

The research infrastructures proposed in this amendment will bring together multi-actor partnerships (research and education partners working with industry, government and NGOS) in EU and in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) to combine production strategies processing optimisation and nutrition impact with sustainable practices across the chain from producer to consumer.Article 66.2 of the WTO TRIPS agreement notes the commitment by developed countries to provide incentives to their enterprises or institutions for the purpose of promoting and encouraging technology transfer to least-developed country Members. The infrastructures proposed will provide the potential for synergies between Horizon Europe and the new Neighbourhood, Development and International Co-operation Instrument. The SDIAs could be co-funded with the Neighbourhood, Development and International Co-operation

AM\1159885EN.docx 15/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Instrument under Horizon Europe rules. An initial budget of €200 million is proposed to kickstart the process.

Amendment 254Gesine Meissner, Deirdre Clune, Ricardo Serrão Santos, Merja Kyllönen, Tonino Picula, Ulrike Rodust, Sergio Gaetano CofferatiProposal for a decisionRecital 7



(7) Reflecting the important contribution that research and innovation should make to address challenges in food, agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture, rural development and the bioeconomy, and to seize the corresponding research and innovation opportunities in close synergy with Common Agricultural Policy and Common Fisheries Policy, relevant actions under the Specific Programme will be supported with EUR 16 billion for the cluster 'Food and Natural Resources from Land and Sea' for the period 2021-2027.

Or. en




(7) Reflecting the important contribution that research and innovation should make to address societal challenges in food, agriculture, rural development and the bioeconomy and make them more sustainable, and to seize the corresponding research and innovation opportunities in close synergy with Common Agricultural Policy, relevant actions under the Specific Programme will be supported in a dedicated cluster 'Sustainable Food, Natural Resources and the Environment' for the period 2021-2027.

Or. en

PE625.594v01-00 16/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Amendment 256Miapetra Kumpula-NatriProposal for a decisionRecital 7



(7) Reflecting the important contribution that research and innovation should make to address challenges in food, agriculture, rural development and the bioeconomy, and to seize the corresponding research and innovation opportunities in close synergy with Common Agricultural Policy, relevant actions under the Specific Programme will be supported with at least EUR 10 billion for the cluster 'Food, the Bioeconomy and Natural Resources' for the period 2021-2027.

Or. en

Amendment 257Lieve Wierinck, Fredrick Federley, Carolina Punset, Angelika MlinarProposal for a decisionRecital 7



(7) Reflecting the important contribution that research and innovation should make to address challenges in food, agriculture, rural development and the bioeconomy, and to seize the corresponding research and innovation opportunities in close synergy with Common Agricultural Policy, relevant actions under the Specific Programme will be supported with EUR 10 billion for the cluster 'Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources' for the period 2021-2027.

Or. en


Text proposed by the Commission AmendmentAM\1159885EN.docx 17/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN


(7) Reflecting the important contribution that research and innovation should make to address challenges in food, agriculture, rural development and the bioeconomy, and to seize the corresponding research and innovation opportunities in close synergy with Common Agricultural Policy, relevant actions under the Specific Programme will receive added support for the cluster 'Food and Natural Resources' for the period 2021-2027.

Or. it

Justification

To ensure consistency with the remainder of the recital, a specific figure should not be given.

Amendment 259Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa Matias, Patrizia Toia, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionRecital 7 a (new)


(7 a) Our future is intimately linked to the future of the seas, oceans and coasts. The seas, oceans and coasts provide multiple ecosystem services and a wealth of resources, influence climate and provide many economic opportunities. The concept Blue Economy (every economic activity associated to oceans, seas, ports and coastal areas) was defined by the European Commission in its report in September 2012 Communication from the Commission: Blue Growth opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth. Horizon Europe will give special attention to activities related to the Blue Economy in all pillars with special focus on clusters ‘Food and Natural Resources'.

Or. en

Amendment 260PE625.594v01-00 18/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionRecital 7 a (new)


(7 a) Horizon Europe should also promote multi-disciplinary approaches to innovation including development of non-technological solutions, organisational approaches, new business models, systems innovation and public sector innovations, as a necessary complement to technology focused activities.

Or. en



(7 b) Cultural Heritage is an integral part of European Cohesion and has the potential to build bridges between tradition and innovation. Preserving and further exploring the heritage by means of research and developing creative solutions in particular in the field of digitalization shall be a priority of the research programme.

Or. en

Amendment 262Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionRecital 8


(8) The completion of the Digital Single Market and the growing opportunities from the convergence of digital and physical technologies requires a stepping up of investments. Horizon Europe will contribute to these efforts with

(8) The completion of the Digital Single Market and the growing opportunities from the convergence of digital and physical technologies requires a stepping up of investments. Horizon Europe will contribute to these efforts with

AM\1159885EN.docx 19/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

a substantial increase of spending in main digital research and innovation activities compared to the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 20206 . This should ensure that Europe remains at the forefront of global research and innovation in the digital field.

at least €16bn in spending in main digital research and innovation activities. This should ensure that Europe remains at the forefront of global research and innovation in the digital field.

_________________6 The Communication from the Commission "A new, modern Multiannual Financial Framework for a European Union that deliver efficiently on its priorities post-2020" identifies EUR 13 billion spent in main digital activities under the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 2020 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0098).

Or. en

Amendment 263Jerzy Buzek, Krišjānis Kariņš, Clare Moody, Christian Ehler, Evžen Tošenovský, Barbara Kudrycka, Michał BoniProposal for a decisionRecital 8


(8) The completion of the Digital Single Market and the growing opportunities from the convergence of digital and physical technologies requires a stepping up of investments. Horizon Europe will contribute to these efforts with a substantial increase of spending in main digital research and innovation activities compared to the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 20206 . This should ensure that Europe remains at the forefront of global research and innovation in the digital field.

(8) The completion of the Digital Single Market and the growing opportunities from the convergence of digital and physical technologies requires a stepping up of investments. Horizon Europe will contribute to these efforts with an appropriate increase of spending in main digital research and innovation activities compared to the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 20206 . This should ensure that Europe remains at the forefront of global research and innovation in the digital field.

_________________ _________________6 The Communication from the Commission "A new, modern Multiannual Financial Framework for a European Union that deliver efficiently on its priorities post-2020" identifies EUR 13 billion spent in main digital activities under

6 The Communication from the Commission "A new, modern Multiannual Financial Framework for a European Union that deliver efficiently on its priorities post-2020" identifies EUR 13 billion spent in main digital activities under

PE625.594v01-00 20/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 2020 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0098).

the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 2020 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0098).

Or. en

Amendment 264Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁukacijewskaProposal for a decisionRecital 8


(8) The completion of the Digital Single Market and the growing opportunities from the convergence of digital and physical technologies requires a stepping up of investments. Horizon Europe will contribute to these efforts with a substantial increase of spending in main digital research and innovation activities compared to the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 20206 . This should ensure that Europe remains at the forefront of global research and innovation in the digital field.

(8) The completion of the Digital Single Market and the growing opportunities from the convergence of digital and physical technologies requires a stepping up of investments. Horizon Europe will adequately contribute to these efforts investing in main digital research and innovation activities compared to the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 20206. This should ensure that Europe remains at the forefront of global research and innovation in the digital field.

_________________ _________________6 The Communication from the Commission "A new, modern Multiannual Financial Framework for a European Union that deliver efficiently on its priorities post-2020" identifies EUR 13 billion spent in main digital activities under the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 2020 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0098).

6 The Communication from the Commission "A new, modern Multiannual Financial Framework for a European Union that deliver efficiently on its priorities post-2020" identifies EUR 13 billion spent in main digital activities under the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 2020 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0098).

Or. en

Amendment 265Angelika NieblerProposal for a decisionRecital 9


(9) The types of financing and the (9) Grants will be the main type of AM\1159885EN.docx 21/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

methods of implementation under this Decision shall be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non-compliance. For grants, this shall include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and scales of unit costs.

financing under this Decision. Other types of financing shall be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non-compliance. For grants, this shall include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and scales of unit costs. Before any new costs reimbursement system could be deemed a real simplification for the beneficiaries, it needs to be preceded b an extensive evaluation which is concluded with a positive result.

Or. en



(9) The types of financing and the methods of implementation under this Decision shall be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non-compliance. For grants, this shall include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and scales of unit costs.

(9) Grants will be the main types of financing under this Decision. Other types of financing shall be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non-compliance. For grants, this shall include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and scales of unit costs where this would not exclude or discriminate the participation of a certain type of organisation or stakeholder.

Or. en



(9) The types of financing and the (9) The types of financing and the PE625.594v01-00 22/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

methods of implementation under this Decision shall be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non-compliance. For grants, this shall include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and scales of unit costs.

methods of implementation under this Decision shall be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non-compliance. For grants, which are the principal source of funding under the Programme, this shall include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and scales of unit costs.

Or. it

Justification

Experience of the Horizon 2020 programme has shown that grants are the most appropriate means of enabling beneficiaries to participate.

Amendment 268Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionRecital 9


(9) The types of financing and the methods of implementation under this Decision shall be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non-compliance. For grants, this shall include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and scales of unit costs.

(9) Grants, prizes and procurements will be the types of financing under this Decision. The type shall be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non-compliance. For grants, this shall include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and scales of unit costs.

Or. en



(9 a) All calls for proposal in the security research field should be subject

AM\1159885EN.docx 23/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

first to an ex-ante ethical and societal impact assessment that pays full regard to the potential societal impact underlying the R&D agenda. An important ethical issues and/or societal impacts raised by such an assessment must then be fully incorporated into the calls for proposals, both an integrated part of the R&D agenda and through dedicated resources for research and analysis that address the specific concerns. In additional, an ethical review shall be performed for each project before and during its implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 270Angelika NieblerProposal for a decisionRecital 9 a (new)


(9 a) The specific objective "Science with and for Society" should build effective cooperation between society and science, attract new talent to science, technology, innovation and entrepreneurs careers, and pair scientific excellence with social awareness and responsibility.

Or. en

Justification

The specific strand for Science with and for Society currently in H2020 shall be re-inserted.

Amendment 271Henna Virkkunen, Lambert van NistelrooijProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a


(a) reinforcing and spreading excellence;

(a) supporting science, research and innovations, reinforcing and spreading excellence;

Or. en

PE625.594v01-00 24/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Amendment 272Ashley Fox, Anthea McIntyre, Evžen Tošenovský, Hans-Olaf HenkelProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a



(a) strengthening Europe’s scientific base and reinforcing and spreading excellence;

Or. en

Amendment 273Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-Darling, Carlos ZorrinhoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a




Or. en

Amendment 274Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco LópezProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a




Or. en

Amendment 275Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a



(a) strengthening Europe's scientific base and reinforcing and spreading excellence;

AM\1159885EN.docx 25/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Or. en

Amendment 276Pervenche Berès, Edouard MartinProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a




Or. en

Amendment 277Gunnar HökmarkProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a



(a) reinforcing excellence and European scientific competitiveness;

Or. en

Amendment 278Krišjānis KariņšProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a



(a) reinforcing and spreading excellence throughout the Union;

Or. en

Amendment 279Barbara Kudrycka, Krišjānis Kariņš, Jerzy Buzek, Algirdas Saudargas, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Dan Nica, Janusz LewandowskiProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)


(a a) widening participation in the Programme, including underrepresented EU Member States and EU R&I

PE625.594v01-00 26/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

institutions

Or. en

Amendment 280Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)


(a a) ensuring that National and Union research and innovation policies and activities are mutually consistent;

Or. en

Justification

This operational objective is inspired to and fully coherent with paragraph 1 of Art. 181 TFUE

Amendment 281Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)


(a b) promoting responsible research and innovation;

Or. en

Amendment 282Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point b


(b) increasing collaboration across sectors and disciplines;

(b) increasing collaboration across sectors and research disciplines, including social sciences and humanities

Or. en

Amendment 283Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasAM\1159885EN.docx 27/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Proposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point b



(b) increasing collaboration across sectors and disciplines, including social sciences and humanities;

Or. en

Amendment 284Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-Darling, Carlos ZorrinhoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point b




Or. en

Amendment 285Pervenche Berès, Edouard MartinProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point b




Or. en

Amendment 286Krišjānis KariņšProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point b



(b) increasing collaboration across sectors and disciplines throughout the Union;

Or. en


EN

Marisa Matias, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)


(b a) Reinforcement of the investment towards Social Sciences and Humanities

Or. en

Amendment 288Barbara Kudrycka, Krišjānis Kariņš, Jerzy Buzek, Algirdas Saudargas, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Janusz LewandowskiProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point c


(c) connecting and developing research infrastructures across the European research area;

(c) connecting, developing and facilitating wide access to research infrastructures across the European Research Area and enhancing its involvement in Horizon Europe’s projects

Or. en

Amendment 289Gunnar HökmarkProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point c



(c) connecting and developing accessible research infrastructures across the European research area, including mobility of researchers to facilitate its use;

Or. en

Amendment 290Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point c


(c) connecting and developing research infrastructures across the European

(c) connecting, developing and facilitating translational and virtual

AM\1159885EN.docx 29/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

research area; access to research infrastructures across the European Research Area;

Or. en

Amendment 291Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-DarlingProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point c



(c) connecting, developing and facilitating transnational and virtual access to research infrastructures across the European research area;

Or. en

Amendment 292Pervenche Berès, Edouard MartinProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point c



(c) connecting, developing and facilitating wide access to research infrastructures and science centers across the European research area

Or. en

Amendment 293Ashley Fox, Anthea McIntyre, Evžen Tošenovský, Hans-Olaf HenkelProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point c



(c) connecting, developing and facilitating wide access to research infrastructures across the European research area;

Or. en

Amendment 294Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionPE625.594v01-00 30/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c



(c) connecting developing and facilitating wide access to research infrastructures across the European research area;

Or. en

Amendment 295Martina WernerProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point c



(c) connecting, developing and improving access to research infrastructures across the European research area;

Or. en

Amendment 296Marisa Matias, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)


(c a) strengthening research into needs expressed by civil society organisations;

Or. en

Amendment 297Marisa Matias, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)


(c b) boosting social leadership for a fair economy through a participatory and transdisciplinary research and social innovation;

Or. en

AM\1159885EN.docx 31/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Amendment 298Martina WernerProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point d


(d) strengthening international cooperation;

(d) strengthening international cooperation and improving the attractiveness of the Union's research infrastructures for cooperation with leading third country research infrastructures;

Or. en

Amendment 299Nadine MoranoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point d



(d) strengthening international cooperation in the interests of the Union;

Or. fr

Amendment 300Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point d



(d) strengthening international cooperation to the benefit of Europe;

Or. en

Amendment 301Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point d



(d) strengthening international cooperation to the benefit of Europe;

Or. enPE625.594v01-00 32/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Amendment 302Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)


(d a) contributing to balanced ERA through financing R&I projects in all Member States retaining researchers and innovators in their Members States of origin.

Or. en

Amendment 303Gunnar HökmarkProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point e


(e) attracting, training and retaining researchers and innovators in the European Research Area, including through mobility of researchers;

(e) attracting, training and retaining European and international researchers and innovators in the European Research Area, including through mobility of researchers and mobility to facilitate access to infrastructure, notably with the aim of establishing the European Research Area as the world's most competitive region for excellent science;

Or. en

Amendment 304Martina WernerProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point e



(e) attracting, training and retaining Union and international researchers and innovators in the European Research Area, including through mobility of researchers;

Or. en

Amendment 305Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-Darling, Carlos ZorrinhoProposal for a decisionAM\1159885EN.docx 33/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e



(e) attracting, training and retaining, in particular young researchers and innovators in the European Research Area, including through mobility of researchers;

Or. en

Amendment 306Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point e



(e) attracting, training and retaining researchers and innovators in the European Research Area, including through their seamless mobility;

Or. en

Justification

Mobility of researchers and innovators

Amendment 307Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point f


(f) fostering open science and ensuring visibility to the public and open access to results;

(f) fostering open science and ensuring visibility to the public and open access to peer-reviewed scientific publications, research data and other research outputs in an open and non-discriminatory manner, free of charge for the end-user

Or. en

Amendment 308Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point f

PE625.594v01-00 34/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN



(f) fostering open science and ensuring visibility to the public and open access to results, peer-reviewed scientific publication, research data and other research outputs in an open and non-discriminatory manner;

Or. en

Amendment 309Martina WernerProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point f



(f) fostering open science and ensuring visibility to the public and open access to results where reasonably possible and with due regard to intellectual property rights;

Or. en

Amendment 310Paul RübigProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point f



(f) fostering open science and ensuring visibility to the public and open access to results in an appropriate manner only;

Or. en

Justification

While acknowledging the potential benefits to make research and data more accessible, European ideas also need to be protected to capitalise and harvest them in the EU. The principle “as open as possible, but as closed as necessary” should be followed.

Amendment 311Rolandas PaksasProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point f


AM\1159885EN.docx 35/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN


(f) fostering open science and ensuring visibility to the public and open access to information on results;

Or. en

Amendment 312Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point f



(f) fostering open science and ensuring visibility to the public and open access to results and data;

Or. en

Justification

Access to data is even more important

Amendment 313Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point g


(g) actively disseminating and exploiting results, in particular for policy development;

(g) disseminating research results, in particular for policy development, through the active involvement of the public;

Or. it

Justification

Public involvement is essential for the dissemination of research results.

Amendment 314Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point h


(h) supporting the implementation of (h) supporting the implementation of

PE625.594v01-00 36/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Union policy priorities; Union policy goals and priorities

Or. en

Amendment 315Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)


(h a) supporting implementation of UN Sustainable Development Goals;

Or. en

Amendment 316Seán Kelly, Mairead McGuinness, Brian Hayes, Deirdre CluneProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)


(h a) Supporting implementation of UN Sustainable Development Goals

Or. en

Amendment 317Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point i


(i) reinforcing the link between research and innovation and other policies, including Sustainable Development Goals;

(i) reinforcing the link between research, innovation and education and other policies, in particular the Sustainable Development Goals and the Goals of the Paris Agreement

Or. en

Amendment 318Anneleen Van BossuytProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point i


EN


(i) reinforcing the link between research and innovation and education other policies, as well as with Sustainable Development Goals;

Or. en

Amendment 319Ashley Fox, Anthea McIntyre, Evžen Tošenovský, Hans-Olaf HenkelProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point i



(i) reinforcing the link between research, innovation and education, and other policies, including Sustainable Development Goals;

Or. en

Amendment 320Clare Moody, Jude Kirton-Darling, Theresa Griffin, Carlos ZorrinhoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point i



(i) reinforcing the link between research, innovation and education, and other policies, including Sustainable Development Goals;

Or. en

Amendment 321Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point i



(i) reinforcing the link between research, innovation, education and other policies, including Sustainable Development Goals;

Or. enPE625.594v01-00 38/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Amendment 322Pervenche Berès, Edouard MartinProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point i



(i) reinforcing the link between research, innovation and education, and other policies, as well as with Sustainable Development Goals;

Or. en

Amendment 323Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)


(i a) addressing market failures, such as R&I on neglected societal challenges with limited private sector interest, or sub-optimal investment situations

Or. en

Amendment 324Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point j


(j) delivering, through R&I missions, on ambitious goals within a set timeframe;

(j) Addressing societal challenges, through R&I missions, by delivering on ambitious goals within a set timeframe;

Or. en

Amendment 325Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point j


(j) delivering, through R&I missions, (j) delivering, through R&I missions,

AM\1159885EN.docx 39/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

on ambitious goals within a set timeframe; on ambitious goals achievable within a set timeframe;

Or. en

Justification

Feasibility is the other crucial feature of missions

Amendment 326Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k


(k) involving citizens and end-users in co-design and co-creation processes;

(k) involving societal actors, including citizens, civil society organisations and end-users in in R&I agenda-setting, including co-design and co-creation processes;

Or. en

Amendment 327Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k



(k) actively involving those concerned, including citizens and end-users, in co-design and co-creation processes, thereby underpinning the multi-stakeholder approach;

Or. it

Justification

See above

Amendment 328Paul RübigProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k


PE625.594v01-00 40/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN


(k) involving citizens, relevant stakeholders from R&I organisations, industry and businesses and end-users in co-design and co-creation processes;

Or. en

Justification

Missions have the important objective to better communicate the research framework programme to EU citizens. Additionally, they will have an impact on the research environment and thus, also on businesses and industry. Thus, these players should be directly involved in the missions’ design process.

Amendment 329Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k



(k) involving societal actors, including citizens and end-users in co-design and co-creation processes;

Or. en

Amendment 330Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-DarlingProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k



(k) involving citizens, from various age ranges and end-users in co-design and co-creation processes;

Or. en

Amendment 331Pervenche Berès, Edouard MartinProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k



(k) involving societal actors, including citizens and end-users in co-design and co-creation processes

AM\1159885EN.docx 41/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Or. en

Amendment 332Ashley Fox, Anthea McIntyre, Evžen Tošenovský, Hans-Olaf HenkelProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k



(k) involving citizens, stakeholders and end-users in co-design and co-creation processes;

Or. en

Amendment 333Kathleen Van BremptProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k a (new)


(k a) addressing market failures, such as R&I on challenges with high societal costs but limited private sector interest or sub-optimal investment opportunities;

Or. en

Amendment 334Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa Matias, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k a (new)


(k a) translating research outcomes into meaningful, tangible benefits for citizens;

Or. en

Amendment 335Seán Kelly, Mairead McGuinness, Brian Hayes, Deirdre CluneProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point k a (new)


(k a) Translating research outcomes into meaningful, tangible benefits for

PE625.594v01-00 42/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

citizens

Or. en

Amendment 336Ashley Fox, Anthea McIntyre, Evžen Tošenovský, Hans-Olaf HenkelProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point l


(l) improving science communication. (l) improving science communication so that the public better understand the potential benefits of emerging tools and technologies;

Or. en

Amendment 337Rolandas PaksasProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point m


(m) accelerating industrial transformation;

(m) Reflecting the EU Industrial Policy Strategy Objectives to unlock the potential of Europe's strategic sectors like Key Enabling Technologies, the Specific Programme's action should provide important contributions in tackling these objectives.

Or. en

Amendment 338Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point m



(m) Reflecting the EU industrial policy strategy objectives to unlock the potential of Europe`s strategic sectors, such as Key Enabling Technologies;

Or. en

Amendment 339Jakop DalundeAM\1159885EN.docx 43/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

on behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point m



(m) accelerating the energy transition and industrial transformation in consistency with a net-zero GHG emission economy;

Or. en

Amendment 340Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point m



(m) driving industrial transformation on the basis of the societal needs;

Or. en

Justification

The societal needs are at the basis of industrial transformation, and industrial transformation should aim to meet societal needs

Amendment 341Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa Matias, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point m a (new)


(m a) accelerating the transition towards a green, sustainable and decarbonised European industry and society;

Or. en

Amendment 342Miapetra Kumpula-NatriProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point m a (new)


PE625.594v01-00 44/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

(m a) improving the global competitiveness of the European economy

Or. en

Amendment 343Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point n


(n) improving skills for innovation; (n) improving skills for research and for technical and social innovation;

Or. en

Amendment 344Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-Darling, Carlos ZorrinhoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point n


(n) improving skills for innovation; (n) improving skills for research and innovation;

Or. en

Amendment 345Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-RajewiczProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point n



Or. en

Amendment 346Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point n


(n) improving skills for innovation; (n) improving training and skills for AM\1159885EN.docx 45/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

innovation;

Or. en

Justification

Links with education (in particular higher education) are crucial

Amendment 347Ashley Fox, Anthea McIntyre, Evžen Tošenovský, Hans-Olaf HenkelProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point n



Or. en

Amendment 348Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point n


(n) improving skills for innovation; (n) improving skills for research and innovation

Or. en

Amendment 349Pervenche Berès, Edouard MartinProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point n



Or. en

Amendment 350Henna Virkkunen, Lambert van NistelrooijProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point o


PE625.594v01-00 46/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

(o) stimulating the creation and scale-up of innovative companies, in particular SMEs;

(o) stimulating the creation and scale-up of innovative companies, in particular start-ups and SMEs;

Or. en

Amendment 351Olle LudvigssonProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point p


(p) improving access to risk finance, in particular where the market does not provide viable financing.

(p) improving access to risk finance, in particular through synergies with InvestEU with a focus on phases where the market does not provide viable financing.

Or. en

Amendment 352Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point p


(p) improving access to risk finance, in particular where the market does not provide viable financing.

(p) improving access to risk finance and patient-capital, in particular where the market does not provide viable financing

Or. en

Amendment 353Lieve Wierinck, Fredrick Federley, Carolina Punset, Angelika MlinarProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point p a (new)


(p a) intensifying multidisciplinarity and integrating the whole spectrum of disciplines, including social sciences and humanities;

Or. en

AM\1159885EN.docx 47/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Justification

Multidisciplinarity and integrating SSH across all parts of Horizon Europe need to be recognised as cross-cutting priorities for the next Framework Programme.

Amendment 354Olle LudvigssonProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point p a (new)


(p a) strengthening gender mainstreaming and the integration of the gender dimension in the content of research and innovation.

Or. en

Amendment 355Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point p a (new)


(p a) Strengthening gender mainstreaming and the integration of the gender dimension in the content of research and innovation

Or. en

Amendment 356Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point p b (new)


(p b) ensuring that at least 50% of the Horizon Europe funding is spent on climate-related research innovation thereby ensuring that Programme contributes to increasing national climate and energy objectives and increases targets within the national energy and climate plans(NECPs)

PE625.594v01-00 48/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Or. en

Amendment 357Anneleen Van BossuytProposal for a decisionArticle 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)


3 a. intensifying multidisciplinarity and integrating the whole spectrum of disciplines, including social sciences and humanities;

Or. en

Amendment 358Lieve Wierinck, Fredrick Federley, Carolina Punset, Caroline Nagtegaal, Angelika MlinarProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part


(1) Pillar I 'Open Science' with the following components:

(1) Pillar I 'Open and Excellent Science' with the following components:

Or. en

Amendment 359Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-DarlingProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part



(1) Pillar I 'Open and Excellent Science' with the following components:

Or. en

Justification

Wherever reference is made to Pillar I Open Science, reference should instead be made to Pillar I 'Open and Excellent Science' throughout.

Amendment 360Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part

AM\1159885EN.docx 49/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN



(1) Pillar I 'Excellent Open Science' with the following components:

Or. en

Amendment 361Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part



(1) Pillar I 'Excellent Science' with the following components:

Or. en



(2) Pillar II 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness' with the following components:

(2) Pillar II 'Global societal challenges and a net-zero GHG emission Economy' with the following components:

Or. en

Amendment 363Angelika NieblerProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part



(2) Pillar II 'Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness' with the following components:

(This amendment applies throughout the text.)

Or. en

Amendment 364

PE625.594v01-00 50/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco López, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part



(2) Pillar II 'Societal Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness' with the following components:

Or. en

Amendment 365Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part



(2) Pillar II 'Competitiveness' with the following components:

Or. en

Amendment 366Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a


(a) cluster 'Health', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 1;

(a) cluster 'Health and well-being', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 1;

Or. en

Amendment 367Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a


(a) cluster 'Health', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 1;

(a) 'Health', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 1;

Or. en

AM\1159885EN.docx 51/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Justification

The word cluster is used in different meanings in the research systems of several MS (e.g. the Clusters of Excellence in Germany, the National Technology Clusters in Italy…). This justification is intended to cover all the recurrence of the word "cluster" in this Decision.

Amendment 368Marisa Matias, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)


(a a) cluster 'Inclusive, Innovative and Reflective Societies', as described in Annex I, Pillar, section 3

Or. en

Amendment 369Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b


(b) cluster 'Inclusive and Secure Society', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2;

(b) cluster 'Inclusive and Reflective Society', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2;

Or. it

Justification

See justification in amended regulation.

Amendment 370Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b



(b) 'Inclusive and Secure Society', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2;

Or. en

Amendment 371Angelika Niebler

PE625.594v01-00 52/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Proposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b



(b) cluster 'Inclusive Societies', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2;


Or. en

Amendment 372Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-RajewiczProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b



(b) cluster 'Inclusive Society', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2;

Or. en

Amendment 373Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b



(b) cluster 'Inclusive Society', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2;

Or. en

Amendment 374Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b


(b) cluster 'Inclusive and Secure Society', as described in Annex I, Pillar II,

(b) cluster 'Inclusive Society', as

AM\1159885EN.docx 53/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

section 2; described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2;

Or. en

Amendment 375Marisa Matias, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b



(b) cluster 'Secure Society', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2;

Or. en

Amendment 376Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa Matias, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)


(b a) cluster 'Secure Society', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2a;

Or. en

Amendment 377Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)


(b a) cluster 'Resilient Society', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 2 (a new);

Or. en

Amendment 378Angelika NieblerProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)


PE625.594v01-00 54/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

(b a) cluster 'Secure Societies'


Or. en

Amendment 379Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-RajewiczProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)


(b a) cluster 'Secure Society'

Or. en

Amendment 380Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)


(ba) cluster 'Secure Society'

Or. it

Justification

see above

Amendment 381Evžen TošenovskýProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c


(c) cluster 'Digital and Industry', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 3;

(c) cluster 'Digital, Industry and Space', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 3;

Or. en

Amendment 382Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c

AM\1159885EN.docx 55/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN



(c) cluster 'Climate, Industry and Space', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 3;

Or. en

Amendment 383Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c



(c) 'Digital and Industry', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 3;

Or. en

Amendment 384Gunnar HökmarkProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d


(d) cluster 'Climate, Energy and Mobility', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 4;

(d) cluster 'Climate, Energy, Natural Resources and Mobility', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 4;

Or. en

Amendment 385Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d



(d) cluster 'Digital, Energy and Mobility', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 4;

Or. en

Amendment 386Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d

PE625.594v01-00 56/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN



(d) 'Climate, Energy and Mobility', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 4;

Or. en

Amendment 387Gunnar HökmarkProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e


(e) cluster Food and Natural Resources', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 5;

deleted

Or. en

Justification

Merged with (d).

Amendment 388Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e



(e) cluster 'Sustainable Food, Natural Resources and the Environment', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 5, as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 5;

Or. en

Amendment 389Gesine Meissner, Ricardo Serrão Santos, Merja Kyllönen, Tonino Picula, Deirdre Clune, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Ulrike RodustProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e



(e) cluster Food and Natural Resources from Land and Sea', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 5;

AM\1159885EN.docx 57/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Or. en

Amendment 390Miapetra Kumpula-NatriProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e



(e) cluster Food, the Bioeconomy and Natural Resources', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 5;

Or. en

Amendment 391Lieve Wierinck, Fredrick Federley, Carolina Punset, Angelika MlinarProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e



(e) cluster Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 5;

Or. en

Amendment 392Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e



(e) Food and Natural Resources', as described in Annex I, Pillar II, section 5;

Or. en

Amendment 393Angelika NieblerProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part


(3) Pillar III 'Open Innovation' with the following components:

(3) Pillar III 'Innovative Europe' with the following components:

PE625.594v01-00 58/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

(This amendment applies throughout the entire text.)

Or. en



(3) Pillar III 'Open Innovation' with the following components:

(3) Pillar III 'Innovative Europe' with the following components:

Or. en

Amendment 395Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a a (new)


(a a) SME Instrument for incremental innovation, as described in Annex I, Pillar III, section 1a;

Or. en

Amendment 396Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a a (new)


(aa) Innovation for SMEs

Or. it

Justification

See above

Amendment 397Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco López, Marisa Matias, Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionAM\1159885EN.docx 59/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a b (new)


(a b) Young Innovators and Talent Return, as described in Annex I, Pillar III, section 1b;

Or. en

Amendment 398Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-RajewiczProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part


(4) Part 'Strengthening the European Research Area' with the following components:

(4) Cross-cutting part 'Strengthening the European Research Area' with the following components:

Or. en

Amendment 399Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-RajewiczProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a


(a) sharing excellence, as described in Annex I, Part 'Strengthening the European Research Area', section 1;

(a) spreading excellence and widening participation, as described in Annex I, Part 'Strengthening the European Research Area', section 1;

Or. en

Amendment 400Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a



(a) sharing excellence and widening participation, as described in Annex I, Part 'Strengthening the European Research Area', section 1;

PE625.594v01-00 60/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Or. en

Amendment 401Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Edward Czesak, Evžen TošenovskýProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a



(a) widening participation, as described in Annex I, Part 'Strengthening the European Research Area', section 1;

Or. en

Amendment 402Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco López, Marisa Matias, Jens GeierProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new)


(b a) citizens in science, as described in Annex I, Part 'Strengthening the European Research Area', section 2a.

Or. en

Amendment 403Angelika NieblerProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new)


(b a) Science with and for Society, as described in Annex I, Part 'Strengthening the European Research Area', section 3.

Or. en

Amendment 404Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new)


(ba) Science with and for Society

AM\1159885EN.docx 61/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Or. it

Justification

See above

Amendment 405Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-RajewiczProposal for a decisionArticle 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)


(4 a) citizens and science , as described in Annex I, part “Strenghtening the European Reseach Area'

Or. en

Amendment 406Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1


1. In accordance with Article 9(1)of Regulation … FP/RfP Regulation, the financial envelope for the implementation of the Specific Programme for the period 2021 to 2027 shall be EUR 94 100 000 000 in current prices.

1. In accordance with Article 9(1) of Regulation … FP/RfP Regulation, the financial envelope for the implementation of the Specific Programme for the period 2021 to 2027 shall be EUR 116 895 000 000 in constant prices.

Or. en

Amendment 407Barbara Kudrycka, Krišjānis Kariņš, Jerzy Buzek, Michał Boni, Algirdas Saudargas, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Janusz LewandowskiProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1



1. In accordance with Article 9(1)of Regulation … FP/RfP Regulation, the financial envelope for the implementation of the Specific Programme for the period 2021 to 2027 shall be EUR 120 000 000 000 in constant prices.

PE625.594v01-00 62/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Or. en

Amendment 408Miapetra Kumpula-NatriProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

Amendment 409Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

Amendment 410Martina WernerProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

AM\1159885EN.docx 63/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Amendment 411Angelika NieblerProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

Amendment 412David BorrelliProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

Amendment 413Massimiliano SaliniProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

Amendment 414Paul RübigProposal for a decisionPE625.594v01-00 64/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Article 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

Justification

Following the report of the independent high level group on maximising the impact of EU Research & Innovation Programmes, chaired by Pascal Lamy and published on 3rd July 2017, the budget of Horizon Europe, in comparison to Horizon 2020, should be doubled to address major issues as oversubscription, reaching the 3% target of GDP invested in R&I and would take the EU's commitment into account to deliver on its political priorities, as embodied in the Rome declaration of March 2017 in which innovation is considered crucial.

Amendment 415Gunnar HökmarkProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

Amendment 416Rolandas PaksasProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




AM\1159885EN.docx 65/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Or. en

Amendment 417Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. it

Amendment 418Henna VirkkunenProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

Amendment 419Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en


EN

Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco López, Marisa Matias, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1




Or. en

Amendment 421Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)


1 a. In addition the amount of EUR 3 105 000 000 transferred to Invest EU.

Or. en

Amendment 422Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part


1. For each mission, a mission board may be established. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

1. For each mission, a mission board shall be established for steering the co-designing and their implementation. It shall be composed of around 15 independent high level individuals. The mission board shall comprise a gender balanced mix of representatives from various backgrounds, sectors, disciplines and interests, including from academia, research and technology organisations, industry of various sizes, territorial authorities, and relevant civil society and end-users' representatives. At least half of the mission board shall include relevant civil society, public institutions, and

AM\1159885EN.docx 67/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

relevant end-users' representatives. The members of the mission board shall be appointed by the Commission, following an independent and transparent procedure for their selection following an open call for expressions of interest. The board shall operate according to the principles of autonomy, transparency and accountability.The mission board shall advise on the following:

Or. en

Justification

In order to guarantee the societal impact as well as a transdisciplinary approach of the missions, the missions board should include a balanced mix of RDI stakeholders, including representatives from relevant civil society and end-user organisations.

Amendment 423Marisa Matias, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission implementation and definition, a mission board may be established for co-designing and monitor its implementation. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives to the defined mission. The mission board shall include representatives from academia, research and technology organizations, NGOs, Industry of all sizes, SMEs, Start Ups, national and local authorities, and relevant end-users representatives such as Trade Unions, Civil Society Organizations, Consumer Protection Organizations, among others. The members of the mission board shall be appointed by the Commission, following an independent and transparent procedure for their selection, including an open call for expressions of interest. They shall advise on the following:

Or. en

PE625.594v01-00 68/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Amendment 424Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board may be established for co-designing and steering implementation. It shall be composed of around 28 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives. The mission board shall cover a balanced geographical distribution and include, inter alia, representatives from academia, research and technology organisations, industry of all sizes, territorial authorities, and relevant end-users' representatives. The members of the mission board shall be appointed by the Commission, following an independent and transparent procedure for their selection, including an open call for expressions of interest. They shall advise on the following:

Or. en

Amendment 425Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board may shall be established for co-designing and steering implementation. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals from various sectors and disciplines, including relevant end-users' representatives. The mission board shall include, among others, academia, research and technology organisations, all-sized industry, national and territorial authorities and relevant end-users' representatives. The members of the mission board shall be appointed by the Commission following an independent and transparent procedure for their identification, including an open call for

AM\1159885EN.docx 69/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

expressions of interest. They shall advise on the following.

Or. en

Amendment 426Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-RajewiczProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board may be established for co-designing and steering implementation. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives. The mission board shall include, inter alia, representatives from academia, research and technology organisations, industry of all sizes, including SMEs, and relevant end-users' representatives and civil society organisations. The members of the mission board shall be appointed by the Commission, following an independent and transparent procedure for their selection, including an open call for expressions of interest. They shall advise on the following:

Or. en

Amendment 427Krišjānis KariņšProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board shall be established. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives and taking into account balanced geographical representation. The members of the mission board shall be appointed by the Commission, following an independent and transparent procedure for their indentification agreed

PE625.594v01-00 70/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

with the Programme Committee. Their term of office shall be limited to four years, not renewable. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

Or. en

Amendment 428Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board shall be established with the task of co-designing and implementation. It shall be composed of around 15 independent high-level individuals, including research experts in various fields and relevant end-users' representatives. Each mission committee shall be selected through a call for nominations or a call for expressions of interest. The mission board shall recommend and advise upon the following:

Or. it

Justification

It is necessary to specify the formation, functions and role of the committee.

Amendment 429Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board shall be established, following an open call for nominations or expression of interest.. It shall be composed of around 15 independent, high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives and shall connect to a high-level panel tasked with ensuring a comprehensive research strategy in the broader field, such as in health. The

AM\1159885EN.docx 71/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

mission board shall advise upon the following:

Or. en

Amendment 430Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-DarlingProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board shall be established. It shall be composed of around 15 independent, high level individuals from various sectors and disciplines, including relevant end-users' representatives and academic experts from different disciplines. Any mission board will be established following an open call for nominations or for an expression of interest. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

Or. en

Amendment 431Martina WernerProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board may be established. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives, representatives from academia, industry, civil society and public administration, as relevant. The mission board shall be established by the Commission in an open and transparent process. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

Or. en

Amendment 432Ashley Fox, Anthea McIntyre, Evžen Tošenovský, Hans-Olaf HenkelProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

PE625.594v01-00 72/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN



1. For each mission, a mission board may be established. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives, stakeholders and academic experts from different disciplines. Each mission board should be established following an open call for nominations or for expressions of interest. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

Or. en

Amendment 433Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board may be established. It shall be composed of maximum 15 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives appointed by the Commission following a transparent and independent recruitment process with participation of applicants from all Member States. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

Or. en

Amendment 434Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Edward Czesak, Evžen TošenovskýProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board should be established. It shall be composed of high level individuals, on per Member State, including relevant end-users' representatives and representatives from industry, SMEs and civil-society. The mission board shall facilitate the decision making process and advise the European

AM\1159885EN.docx 73/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Commission upon the following:

Or. en

Amendment 435Anneleen Van BossuytProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board shall be established. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals representing various institutional and sectoral actors, including relevant end-users' representatives. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

Or. en

Amendment 436Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part



1. For each mission, a mission board shall be established. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

Or. en

Justification

The formula “may be established” is too vague.

Amendment 437Lieve Wierinck, Fredrick Federley, Angelika MlinarProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part


1. For each mission, a mission board may be established. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals including

1. For each mission, a mission board shall be established. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals

PE625.594v01-00 74/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

relevant end-users' representatives. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

including relevant end-users' representatives. The mission board shall advise upon the following:

Or. en

Amendment 438Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Edward Czesak, Evžen TošenovskýProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point a


(a) content of work programmes and their revision as needed for achieving the mission objectives, in co-design with stakeholders and the public where relevant;

(a) content of work programmes and their revision as needed for achieving the mission objectives, in co-design with stakeholders and the public where relevant, work programmes will then be submitted to the Strategic Programme Committee for approval;

Or. en




(a) content of relevant work programmes and their revision as needed for achieving the mission objectives, in co-creation and co-design with stakeholders, including civil society and citizens;

Or. en

Amendment 440Olle LudvigssonProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point a



(a) content of relevant work programmes and their revision as needed for achieving the mission objectives, in co-design with stakeholders and the public

AM\1159885EN.docx 75/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

where relevant;

Or. en

Amendment 441Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point a



(a) content of work programmes and their revision as needed for achieving the mission objectives, in co-design with stakeholders and the public;

Or. en

Justification

Due to the ‘special’ nature of missions, it is always relevant, by definition

Amendment 442Anneleen Van BossuytProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point c


(c) selection of expert evaluators, briefing of expert evaluators and evaluation criteria and their weighting;

(c) selection of expert evaluators, briefing of expert evaluators and evaluation criteria and their weighting in addition to the standard selection criteria namely "excellence; impact; and quality and efficiency of the implementation", as mentioned in the Regulation under the heading "The rules for participation and dissemination’;

Or. en

Amendment 443Lieve Wierinck, Fredrick Federley, Carolina Punset, Caroline Nagtegaal, Angelika MlinarProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point c


(c) selection of expert evaluators, (c) selection of expert evaluators,

PE625.594v01-00 76/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

briefing of expert evaluators and evaluation criteria and their weighting;

briefing of expert evaluators and evaluation criteria and their weighting in addition to the standard selection criteria namely "excellence; impact; and quality and efficiency of the implementation", as mentioned in the Regulation under the heading "The rules for participation and dissemination".

Or. en

Amendment 444Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point c



(c) selection of expert evaluators, briefing of expert evaluators and evaluation criteria and their weighting, in accordance with Article 25, 26 and 44 of [Regulation on Establishing the Framework Programme];

Or. en

Justification

It is important to clarify the evaluation procedure and align the Decision on establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe to the overall Regulation for the programme.

Amendment 445Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Edward Czesak, Evžen TošenovskýProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point c



(c) selection of expert evaluators, ensuring a balanced geographical composition of expert panels, briefing of expert evaluators and evaluation criteria and their weighting;

Or. en

Amendment 446Henna VirkkunenAM\1159885EN.docx 77/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Proposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point c



(c) selection of expert evaluators, briefing of expert evaluators and evaluation criteria and their weighting, avoid conflict of interest of expert evaluators;

Or. en

Amendment 447Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point e


(e) communication. (e) public engagement.

Or. it

Justification

Public engagement is a wider concept, extending to active public involvement.

Amendment 448Henna Virkkunen, Lambert van NistelrooijProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)


(e a) clear and measurable mission targets and outcome;

Or. en

Amendment 449Henna Virkkunen, Lambert van NistelrooijProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)


(e b) evaluation of business potential of the mission;

Or. en

PE625.594v01-00 78/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Amendment 450Paul RübigProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)


1 a. Missions will have their emphasis either on acceleration technological change (“Accelerator missions”) or aim to transform entire systems (“Transformator missions”). Transformator missions may contain a number of accelerator missions.

Or. en

Justification

With regard to the objective of achieving an effective impact of a mission, it is not feasible to arrange for co-design and co-creation by stakeholders and citizens for missions, which in their execution are quite technical. To this end it is advisable, to explicitly establish a differentiation into two kinds of missions, as had been proposed in the academic discussions on the mission concept. In addition it is established that one, the more technical oriented mission (the “accelerator mission”), can be part of the other. This differentiation also allows to establish co-design and co-creation by stakeholders and citizens on the more general level which will also provide the strategic guidance for the more technical level without obstructing its progress.

Amendment 451Barbara KappelProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)


1 a. f. Missions will have their emphasis either on acceleration technological change (“accelerator missions”) or aim to transform entire systems (“transformator missions”). Transformator missions may contain a number of accelerator missions.

Or. en

Amendment 452Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)


AM\1159885EN.docx 79/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

1a. The missions will focus on swifter technological change or systems conversion to this end. Missions focusing on conversion could encompass a number of those seeking swifter change.

Or. it

Amendment 453Evžen TošenovskýProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)


1 a. Missions shall have their emphasis on either acceleration technological change or aim to transform entire systems. Missions transforming entire systems may contain a number of accelerator missions.

Or. en



2. Specific provisions to enable an efficient and flexible portfolio approach may be set out in the work programme provided for in Article 11.

2. Specific provisions to enable an efficient and flexible portfolio approach shall be set out in the work programme provided for in Article 11.

Or. en

Amendment 455Francesc GambúsProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)


(a) Gender mainstreaming shall be ensured throughout every mission.

Or. esPE625.594v01-00 80/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Amendment 456Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)


2 a. All missions shall properly integrate sex/gender analysis methods and the participation of gender experts and gender equality stakeholders across the mission cycle, from strategic planning to monitoring and evaluation, shall be ensured. Provisions shall be made on: clear gender criteria to select missions, gender experts among evaluators, and gender indicators in the monitoring and impact evaluation of missions.

Or. en

Amendment 457Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)


2 a. The content of the missions, their implementation method, including their scope, indicators, measurable targets and milestones, estimated budget and synergies with other Union funds and links with European Partnerships shall be laid down in Strategic R&I Plans, in accordance with Article [6] [Regulation establishing the Framework Programme].

Or. en

Amendment 458Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)


2 a. Details on the implementing of the missions including scope, indicators,

AM\1159885EN.docx 81/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

measurable targets and milestones, synergies with other EU funds and links with European Partnerships, shall be defined in the strategic R&I plans as outlined in Annex I of this Decision.

Or. en

Amendment 459Anneleen Van BossuytProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)


2 a. Missions shall be implemented through open calls within the work programmes of the relevant clusters, calling for project proposals which are contributing to the mission and which are situated in one or more of the intervention areas of the cluster.

Or. en

Amendment 460Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-RajewiczProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)


2 a. Missions shall be implemented through collaborative calls for proposals within the work programmes. Calls for proposals shall allow for excellence-driven projects of all research, technological and societal readiness levels.

Or. en

Amendment 461Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 2 b (new)


PE625.594v01-00 82/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

2 b. Missions shall be implemented through collaborative calls for proposals within the work programmes.The work programme shall specify their objectives, funding, targets and timeline.The proportion that should be covered by the Programme of the total estimated cost to achieve the missions may vary from Mission to Mission.Missions requiring bigger sums of money from outside the Programme will include a plan for how this money will be raised.

Selection, evaluation and award criteria will apply in accordance with Article 25 and 26 of [Regulation establishing the Framework Programme]

Or. en

Amendment 462Anneleen Van BossuytProposal for a decisionArticle 5 – paragraph 2 b (new)


2 b. The proposals will be evaluated by the evaluation committee for the mission, which will evaluate all proposals submitted under the different work programmes as one portfolio, but only for those project proposals that have been evaluated by independent experts beforehand and that passed the threshold.

Or. en

Amendment 463Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-DarlingProposal for a decisionArticle 6 – paragraph 1


1. The Commission shall establish a European Research Council ("ERC"), for implementing the actions under Pillar I 'Open Science' which relate to the ERC. The ERC shall succeed the ERC set up by Decision C(2013) 18957 .

1. The Commission shall establish a European Research Council ("ERC"), for implementing the actions under Pillar I 'Open and Excellent Science' which relate to the ERC. The ERC shall succeed the ERC set up by Decision C(2013) 18957 .

AM\1159885EN.docx 83/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

_________________ _________________7 OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 23 7 OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 23

Or. en



1. The Commission shall establish a European Research Council ("ERC"), for implementing the actions under Pillar I 'Open Science' which relate to the ERC. The ERC shall succeed the ERC set up by Decision C(2013) 18957 .

1. The Commission shall establish a European Research Council ("ERC"), for implementing the actions under Pillar I 'Excellent Science' which relate to the ERC. The ERC shall succeed the ERC set up by Decision C(2013) 18957 .

_________________ _________________7 OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 23 7 OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 23

Or. en

Amendment 465Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2


The President shall be appointed by the Commission following a transparent recruitment process involving an independent dedicated search committee, for a term of office limited to four years, renewable once. The recruitment process and the candidate selected shall have the approval of the Scientific Council.

The President shall be appointed by the Commission following a transparent recruitment process involving an independent dedicated search committee, for a term of office limited to three years, renewable once. The recruitment process and the candidate selected shall have the approval of the Scientific Council.

Or. en

Justification

Two mandates of 4 years would exceed even the duration of the Framework Programme, which seems totally inappropriate

Amendment 466Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionPE625.594v01-00 84/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Article 6 – paragraph 4


4. The ERC shall operate according to the principles of scientific excellence, autonomy, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency and accountability. It shall ensure continuity with ERC actions conducted under Decision …/EC.

4. The ERC shall operate according to the principles of scientific merit, autonomy, efficiency, effectiveness, openness, transparency and accountability. It shall ensure continuity with ERC actions conducted under Decision …/EC.

Or. en

Justification

Scientific merit is measurable, excellence is not. Openness is of paramount importance

Amendment 467Evžen TošenovskýProposal for a decisionArticle 6 – paragraph 5


5. The activities of the ERC shall support research carried out across all fields by individual and transnational teams in competition at the European level.

5. The activities of the ERC shall support research carried out across all fields by individual and transnational teams in competition at the European level. ERC frontier research grants shall be awarded on the sole criterion of excellence.

Or. en



5. The activities of the ERC shall support research carried out across all fields by individual and transnational teams in competition at the European level.

5. The activities of the ERC shall support research carried out across all fields by individual and transnational teams in competition at the European level, according to worldwide benchmarks.

Or. en

Amendment 469Marisa Matias, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyProposal for a decision

AM\1159885EN.docx 85/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1


The Scientific Council shall be composed of scientists, engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, of both women and men in different age groups, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests.

The Scientific Council shall be composed of scientists, engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests.The composition of the Scientific Council shall have into account gender balance, different age groups and geographical distribution and representation.

Or. en

Amendment 470Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1



The Scientific Council shall be composed of 27 of members, representing all Member States, scientists, engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, of both women and men in different age groups, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests.

Or. en

Amendment 471Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Edward Czesak, Evžen TošenovskýProposal for a decisionArticle 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1



The Scientific Council shall be composed of scientists, engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, of both women and men in different age groups, ensuring a balanced geographical distribution, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous

PE625.594v01-00 86/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

interests.

Or. en

Amendment 472Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1



The Scientific Council shall be composed of scientists, engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, aiming for equality among both women and men in different age groups, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests.

Or. en

Amendment 473Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1



The Scientific Council shall be composed of scientists, engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, of both women and men in different age groups, ensuring a diversity of research areas and disciplines and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests.

Or. en



The Scientific Council shall be composed of scientists, engineers and scholars of the

The Scientific Council shall be gender balanced and composed of scientists,

AM\1159885EN.docx 87/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

highest repute and appropriate expertise, of both women and men in different age groups, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests.

engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, in different age groups, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests.

Or. en



Their term of office shall be limited to four years, renewable once, on the basis of a rotating system which shall ensure the continuity of the work of the Scientific Council.

Their term of office shall be limited to three years, renewable once, on the basis of a rotating system which shall ensure the continuity of the work of the Scientific Council.

Or. en

Amendment 476Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a


(a) the overall strategy for the ERC; deleted

Or. en

Justification

The autonomy of the ERC should be rigorously guaranteed and preserved, but limited to points (b), (c), (d) below. The overall strategy is (or should be) determined by the Framework Programme.

Amendment 477Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b


(b) the work programme for the implementation of the ERC activities;

(b) the work programme for the implementation of the ERC activities, in consultation with the relevant

PE625.594v01-00 88/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

configuration of the Programme Committee;

Or. en

Amendment 478Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e


(e) a code of conduct addressing, inter alia, the avoidance of conflict of interests.

deleted

Or. en

Justification

The definition of the code of conduct should be the responsibility of a body which does not coincide with that which is subject to the code itself. This provision, in its current form, is absolutely anomalous (quis custodiet custodes?).



The Commission shall depart from the positions established by the Scientific Council in accordance with points (a), (c), (d), and (e) of the first subparagraph only when it considers that the provisions of this Decision have not been respected. In that case, the Commission shall adopt measures to maintain continuity in the implementation of the specific programme and the achievements of its objectives, setting out the points of departure from the Scientific Council positions and duly motivating them.

The Commission shall depart from the positions established by the Scientific Council in accordance with points (c) and (d) of the previous subparagraph only when it considers that the provisions of this Decision have not been respected. In that case, the Commission shall adopt measures to maintain continuity in the implementation of the specific programme and the achievements of its objectives, setting out the points of departure from the Scientific Council positions and duly motivating them.

Or. en

Justification

In coherence with the previous AM.

Amendment 480

AM\1159885EN.docx 89/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-RajewiczProposal for a decisionArticle 7 – paragraph 4


4. The Scientific Council shall act exclusively in the interest of achieving the ERC, according to the principles set out in Article 6. It shall act with integrity and probity and carry out its work efficiently and with the greatest possible transparency.

4. The Scientific Council shall act exclusively in the interest of achieving the ERC’s goals, according to the principles set out in Article 6. It shall act with integrity and probity and carry out its work efficiently and with the greatest possible transparency, maximising ERC’s contribution to achieving the EU R&I policy objectives and Horizon Europe’s goals in particular.

Or. en




4. The Scientific Council shall act exclusively in the interest of achieving the ERC, according to the principles set out in Article 6. It shall act with complete independence, integrity and probity and carry out its work efficiently and with the greatest possible transparency.

Or. en




4. The Scientific Council shall act exclusively in the interest of achieving the ERC objectives, according to the principles set out in Article 6. It shall act with integrity and probity and carry out its work efficiently and with the greatest

PE625.594v01-00 90/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

transparency and openness.

Or. en



2. The Commission shall ensure that the dedicated implementation structure follows strictly, efficiently and with the necessary flexibility the objectives and requirements of the ERC alone.

2. The Commission shall ensure that the dedicated implementation structure follows strictly, efficiently and with the necessary flexibility the objectives and requirements of the ERC.

Or. en

Amendment 484Pervenche Berès, Edouard MartinProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1


1. The Commission shall establish a European Innovation Council (EIC) for implementing actions under Pillar III 'Open Innovation' which relate to the EIC. The EIC shall operate according to the following principles: focus on breakthrough and disruptive innovation, autonomy, ability to take risk, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency and accountability.

1. The Commission shall establish a European Innovation Council (EIC) for implementing actions under Pillar III 'Open Innovation' which relate to the EIC. The EIC shall operate according to the following principles : focus on new ideas towards radically new future opportunities, break through and disruptive social, technological and non-technological innovations, sparking vocations in research and stimulating education and training of future innovators, autonomy, ability to take risk, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency and accountability.

Or. en



EN


1. The Commission shall establish a European Innovation Council (EIC) for implementing actions under Pillar III 'Innovative Europe' which relate to the EIC. The EIC shall operate according to the following principles: focus on new ideas, which could lead to disruptive social, technological and non-technological innovations, stimulating education and training of future innovators, autonomy, ability to take risk, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency and accountability, alignment with the overall Union policy goals and commitments.

Or. en

Amendment 486Barbara Kudrycka, Jerzy Buzek, Algirdas Saudargas, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Janusz LewandowskiProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1



1. The Commission shall establish a European Innovation Council (EIC) for implementing actions under Pillar III 'Innovative Europe' which relate to the EIC. The EIC shall operate according to the following principles: focus on new ideas, which could lead to breakthrough and disruptive societal, economic and technological innovation, autonomy, ability to take risk, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency and accountability, while strengthening EU global competitiveness and R&I capacity of all EU Member States.

Or. en

Amendment 487Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1


PE625.594v01-00 92/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN


1. The Commission shall establish a European Innovation Council (EIC) for implementing actions under Pillar III 'Open Innovation' which relate to the EIC. The EIC shall operate according to the following principles: focus on fresh ideas leading to radically new future opportunities, social, technological, non-technological breakthrough and disruptive innovation providing a stimulus for the education and training of future innovators, autonomy, ability to take risk, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency and accountability.

Or. it

Justification

The EIC is centred primarily on breakthrough innovation; A share of CEI innovation funding will be earmarked for the training of future innovators so as to establish a virtuous cycle.

Amendment 488Hermann WinklerProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1



1. The Commission shall establish a European Innovation Council (EIC) for implementing actions under Pillar III 'Open Innovation' which relate to the EIC. The EIC shall operate according to the following principles: focus on breakthrough and disruptive innovation, autonomy, ability to take risk, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency, accountability and first commercial use. The EIC shall introduce measures specifically relating to project results from all research and innovation framework programmes.

Or. de

Justification

The innovative capacity of the programmes should be stepped up. The marketability of the results obtained through European research initiatives should be more strongly highlighted. The proposal set out in COM(2018)0435 should of course follow suit, as reflected by the amendment to recital 21 thereof.AM\1159885EN.docx 93/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Amendment 489Massimiliano SaliniProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1



1. The Commission shall establish a European Innovation Council (EIC) for implementing actions under Pillar III 'Open Innovation' which relate to the EIC. The EIC shall operate according to the following principles: focus on enabling breakthrough and disruptive innovation, autonomy, ability to take risk, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency, sustainability, accountability and alignment with the overall EU industrial policy strategy.

Or. en

Amendment 490Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, José Blanco López, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1



1. The Commission shall establish a European Innovation Council (EIC) for implementing actions under Pillar III 'Open Innovation' which relate to the EIC. The EIC shall operate according to the following principles: focus on breakthrough and disruptive innovation, as well as incremental and social innovation, autonomy, ability to take risk, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency and accountability.

Or. en

Amendment 491Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-Darling, Carlos ZorrinhoProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1


PE625.594v01-00 94/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN


1. The Commission shall establish a European Innovation Council (EIC) for implementing actions under Pillar III 'Open Innovation' which relate to the EIC. The EIC shall operate according to the following principles: focus on breakthrough and disruptive innovation, incremental innovation, autonomy, ability to take risk, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency and accountability.

Or. en



1 a. The EIC will consist of into two instruments, the Pathfinder and the Accelerator, as described in Annex I of this Decision. Both instruments shall aim at early stage high risk research and innovation which often needs patient-capital and to develop new iterative innovation patterns capable of supporting innovation in a systemic way.

Or. en

Amendment 493Barbara Kudrycka, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Michał BoniProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)


1 a. The EIC will be responsible for two instruments, the Pathfinder and the Accelerator, as described in Annex I of this Decision. Both instruments shall aim to develop new innovation patterns capable of supporting research-driven innovation in a systemic way.

Or. en

AM\1159885EN.docx 95/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Amendment 494Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)


1 a. Where appropriate, the EIC objectives and actions shall be linked to other parts of the Programme as well as other national and EU Funds, in particular the EIT and InvestEU.

Or. en

Amendment 495Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 1 b (new)


1 b. Where appropriate, the EIC objectives and actions shall be linked to other parts of the Programme as well as to other national and Union Funds, in particular the EIT and InvestEU.

Or. en

Amendment 496Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Edward Czesak, Evžen TošenovskýProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)


(a a) ( a a) taking due account of the opinion of the specific Programme Committee;

Or. en

Amendment 497Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission AmendmentPE625.594v01-00 96/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

4. For the purpose of managing EIC blended finance, the Commission shall make use of indirect management, or where this is not possible, may establish a special purpose vehicle. The Commission shall seek to ensure the participation of other public and private investors. Where this is not possible at the initial set up, the special purpose vehicle will be structured in such a way that it can attract other public or private investors in order to increase the leverage effect of the Union contribution.

4. For the purpose of managing EIC blended finance, the Commission shall make use of indirect management by its executive agencies. The Commission shall seek to ensure the participation of other public and private investors.

Or. en

Justification

The Accelerator should not be managed by private agents.

Amendment 498Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)


4a. The Commission shall coordinate EIT and EIC activities at every level so as to ensure systematic cooperation.

Or. it

Justification

The two mainstays of this pillar are in a position to complement and reinforce each other.

Amendment 499Michał Boni, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jerzy Buzek, Henna Virkkunen, Barbara KudryckaProposal for a decisionArticle 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)


4 a. The Commission shall ensure close cooperation between EIT KICs the wider Framework Programme.

AM\1159885EN.docx 97/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Or. en



4 a. The Commission shall ensure structural cooperation between the EIT and the EIC at all levels

Or. en



(a) the overall strategy for the EIC component under Pillar III 'Open Innovation';

(a) the overall strategy for the EIC component under Pillar III 'Innovative Europe';

Or. en

Amendment 502Krišjānis KariņšProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 1 – point d


(d) the identification of strategic portfolio of projects;

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 503Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part


The EIC Board may upon request address The EIC Board may upon request, and in

PE625.594v01-00 98/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

recommendations to the Commission on: coordination with the EIT Governing Board, address recommendations to the Commission on:

Or. en

Amendment 504Jerzy Buzek, Krišjānis Kariņš, Clare Moody, Christian Ehler, Evžen Tošenovský, Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Lambert van NistelrooijProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part


The EIC Board may upon request address recommendations to the Commission on:

The EIC Board may upon request, and in coordination with the EIT Governing Board, address recommendations to the Commission on:

Or. en

Amendment 505Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b


(b) identify in cooperation with relevant Commission services possible regulatory barriers faced by entrepreneurs, in particular those awarded support under the EIC component;

(b) identify in cooperation with relevant Commission services and the EIT possible regulatory barriers faced by entrepreneurs, in particular those awarded support under the EIC component;

Or. en

Amendment 506Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2


The EIC Board shall act in the interest of achieving the objectives of the EIC component. It shall act with integrity and probity and carry out its work efficiently and with transparency.

The EIC Board shall act in the interest of achieving the objectives of the EIC component and in line with EU industrial policy priorities. It shall act with integrity and probity and carry out its work efficiently and with transparency, taking care to avoid distortions of competition in

AM\1159885EN.docx 99/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

the internal market.

Or. it

Justification

The activities of the EIC and its committee must be in line with EU industrial policy to ensure the coherent prioritisation of EU resources.



The EIC Board shall act in the interest of achieving the objectives of the EIC component. It shall act with integrity and probity and carry out its work efficiently and with transparency.

The EIC Board shall act in the interest of achieving the objectives of the EIC component. It shall act with integrity and probity and carry out its work efficiently and with transparency and openness.

Or. en



The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors and researchers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, economists investors and researchers, academic experts on innovation policy and civil society organisations. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand. The Board shall aim at a wider range of expertise, following a broad approach to R&I that includes social innovation.

Or. en

Amendment 509Marisa Matias, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyPE625.594v01-00 100/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Proposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1



The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 independent high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, namely the social innovation, including entrepreneurs, corporate representatives, investors, researchers and other relevant actors from cultural domains. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

Or. en

Amendment 510Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1



The EIC Board shall cover a balanced geographical and gender distribution and shall be composed of 28 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors and researchers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

Or. en

Amendment 511Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁukacijewskaProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1


The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs,

The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's research and innovation ecosystem, including

AM\1159885EN.docx 101/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

corporate leaders, investors and researchers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

entrepreneurs, industrial leaders, economists, investors, researchers and academic experts on innovation policy. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

Or. en

Amendment 512Clare Moody, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-Darling, Carlos ZorrinhoProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1



The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's research and innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors, academic experts and researchers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

Or. en




The EIC Board shall be composed of 27 high level individuals representing all Member States drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors and researchers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

Or. en

Amendment 514Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Marisa Matias, Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionPE625.594v01-00 102/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1



The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors, researchers, academia and designers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

Or. en

Amendment 515Ashley Fox, Anthea McIntyre, Evžen Tošenovský, Hans-Olaf HenkelProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1



The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors, academic experts and researchers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

Or. en

Amendment 516Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1



The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's research and innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors and researchers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

AM\1159885EN.docx 103/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Or. en




The EIC Board shall be composed of one high level individuals per Member State drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors and researchers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

Or. en




The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors and researchers. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.

Or. en



The members of the EIC Board shall be appointed by the Commission, following an open call for nominations or for expression of interests or both, whichever the Commission will find more

The members of the EIC Board shall be appointed by the Commission, following an open call for nominations or for expression of interests or both, whichever the Commission will find more

PE625.594v01-00 104/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

appropriate,, and taking into account the need for balance in expertise, gender, age and geographical distribution.

appropriate, and taking into account the need for balance in expertise, gender and age.

Or. en



Their term of office shall be limited to two years, renewable twice, with a rolling appointments system (members appointed every two years).

Their term of office shall be limited to two years, renewable once, with a rolling appointments system (half of the members exchanged every two years).

Or. en



Their term of office shall be limited to two years, renewable twice, with a rolling appointments system (members appointed every two years).

Their term of office shall be limited to two years, renewable once, with a rolling appointments system (members appointed every two years).

Or. en

Amendment 522Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Carlos Zorrinho, Marisa Matias, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)


The European Parliament shall be informed and consulted before the appointment of the President and the members of the EIC Board.

Or. en

Amendment 523Patrizia ToiaAM\1159885EN.docx 105/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Proposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1


The EIC Board shall have a President who shall be appointed by the Commission following a transparent recruitment process. The President shall be a high profile public figure linked to the innovation world.

The EIC Board shall have a President who shall be appointed by the Commission following a transparent recruitment process. The President shall be a high profile public figure linked to the innovation world encompassing business people, company executives, investors, experts and academics.

Or. it

Justification

It is necessary to specify who is meant to ensure adequate representation of those involved in the world of innovation.

Amendment 524Miapetra Kumpula-NatriProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1



The EIC Board shall have a President who shall be appointed by the Commission following a transparent recruitment process.

Or. en

Amendment 525Marisa Matias, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Lola Sánchez CaldenteyProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1



The EIC Board shall have a President who shall be appointed by the Commission following a transparent recruitment process. The President shall be a high profile figure with a proven expertise in the innovation world.

PE625.594v01-00 106/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Or. en



The President shall be appointed for a term of office limited to four years, renewable once.

The President shall be appointed for a term of office limited to four years, not renewable.

Or. en



The President shall chair the EIC Board, prepare its meetings, assign tasks to members, and may establish dedicated sub-groups, in particular to identify emerging technology trends from EIC's portfolio. He or she shall promote the EIC, act as interlocutor with the Commission and represent the EIC in the world of innovation. The Commission may provide for administrative support for the President to undertake his or her duties.

The President shall chair the EIC Board, prepare its meetings, assign tasks to members, and may establish dedicated sub-groups, in particular to identify emerging technology trends from EIC's portfolio. He or she shall promote the EIC and its role in achieving EU R&I goals, act as interlocutor with the Commission and represent the EIC in the world of research and innovation. The Commission may provide for administrative support for the President to undertake his or her duties.

Or. en



The President shall chair the EIC Board, prepare its meetings, assign tasks to members, and may establish dedicated sub-groups, in particular to identify emerging technology trends from EIC's portfolio. He or she shall promote the EIC, act as

The President shall chair the EIC Board, prepare its meetings, assign tasks to members, and may establish dedicated sub-groups, in particular to identify emerging technology trends from EIC's portfolio. He or she shall promote the EIC, act as

AM\1159885EN.docx 107/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

interlocutor with the Commission and represent the EIC in the world of innovation. The Commission may provide for administrative support for the President to undertake his or her duties.

interlocutor with the Commission and represent the EIC in the world of innovation. The Commission shall provide for administrative support for the President to undertake his or her duties.

Or. en

Amendment 529Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Marisa Matias, Dan NicaProposal for a decisionArticle 10 – paragraph 5


5. A code of conduct addressing, inter alia, the avoidance of conflict of interests shall be established by the Commission. Members of the EIC Board are expected to accept the code of conduct upon assuming office.

5. A code of conduct addressing, inter alia, the avoidance of conflict of interests shall be established by the Commission. Members of the EIC Board are expected to accept the code of conduct upon assuming office, and shall be dismissed in case a conflict of interests arises.

Or. en



5. A code of conduct addressing, inter alia, the avoidance of conflict of interests shall be established by the Commission. Members of the EIC Board are expected to accept the code of conduct upon assuming office.

5. A code of conduct addressing, inter alia, the avoidance of conflict of interests shall be established by the Commission. Members of the EIC Board must accept the code of conduct upon assuming office.

Or. en

Amendment 531Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph –1 (new)


-1 The implementation of the specific programme shall be based on Specific

PE625.594v01-00 108/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

R&I Plans defined every two years, through delegated acts in accordance with Article 6 of the Regulation and following a transparent and strategic multiannual planning process of research and innovation activities, in particular for the pillar 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness'. The consultations with national authorities, the European Parliament, stakeholders and civil society representatives about priorities and the suitable types of action and forms of implementation to use shall ensure alignment with other relevant Union programmes and increase consistency with national and regional RDI funding programmes and priorities, thereby strengthening the ERA, as described in Annex I to this Decision.

Or. en



The Programme shall be implemented by work programmes referred to in Article 110 of Financial Regulation. They shall be prepared following a strategic planning process as described in Annex I to this Decision.

The implementation of the Specific Programme shall be based on specific R&I Plans formulated every two years, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 6 of [Regulation establishing the Framework Programme] and following a transparent, inclusive, and strategic multiannual planning process of research and innovation activities, in particular for the pillar 'Global Societal Challenges and a net-zero GHG emission Economy', as well as suitable types of actions and forms of implementation, including missions areas and European partnerships. Mandatory multi-stakeholder consultations with national authorities, the European Parliament, and RDI stakeholders’ representatives, including civil society, about priorities and the suitable types of action and forms of implementation, including missions

AM\1159885EN.docx 109/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

and European partnerships, shall ensure the necessary inter-disciplinary and cross-sectoral perspectives and alignment with other relevant existing initiatives at Union, national and regional level, in order to leverage additional private and public funding, as described in Annex I to this Decision. To ensure meaningful engagement with civil society, a structured dialogue will be established to facilitate civil society input in the Strategic Planning Process.

Following the strategic R&I plan, the Programme shall be implemented by work programmes referred to in Article 110 of Financial Regulation. All documents to prepare work programmes, including draft work programmes, will be posted on the public register of Commission documents.

Or. en




The Programme shall be implemented by work programmes referred to in Article 110 of Financial Regulation. They shall be prepared based on the Strategic Plan, following a strategic planning process as described in Annex I to this Decision. Commission shall present the strategic plan latest December 31, 2021 together with a Comprehensive Programme by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 12 a.Strategic Plan and Comprehensive Programme may be modified after a minimum two years period from the previous proposal. Commission will present an implementing act regarding the procedure to adapt the Strategic Plan and the Comprehensive Programme to crises and emergencies.

PE625.594v01-00 110/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Or. en

Amendment 534Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1



The Programme shall be implemented by specific two-yearly work programmes referred to in Article 110 of Financial Regulation. The work programmes shall be drawn up in full accordance with the principle of subsidiarity and following a transparent and coherent process that will include online publication of provisional texts. Consultations shall be held with the national authorities, the European Parliament and stakeholder representatives to establish priorities and suitable lines of action to ensure consistency with other related Union programmes. The strategic programme shall be adopted by means of delegated acts.

Or. it

Justification

The working programmes must ensure maximum involvement of Parliament and other stakeholders. Delegated acts will give the EP a say in the wording thereof.




The implementation of the Specific Programme shall be based on R&I plans forming a part of the Programme’s legal base. Following the strategic R&I plan, the Programme shall be implemented by work programmes referred to in Article 110 of Financial Regulation.

Or. en

AM\1159885EN.docx 111/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Amendment 536Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1



Following the strategic R&I plan, the Programme shall be implemented by work programmes referred to in Article 110 of Financial Regulation.

Or. en



Work programmes shall set out, where applicable, the overall amount reserved for blending operations.

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 538Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupMarisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)


Work programmes, for the topics that they concern, will contain an estimate of the percentage of the Programme’s contribution that is climate-relevant. The Commission will analyse why significant discrepancies (if any) arise between this estimate and the aggregate estimates of funded beneficiaries in that Work programme

Or. en


EN

Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 b (new)


Work programmes for the different clusters of the 'Global Societal Challenges and a net-zero GHG emission Economy' pillar shall set out the overall amount (at least 70% of the pillar’s overall expenditure) reserved for projects aiming primarily at delivering societal impact and addressing societal challenges as defined by the Sustainable Development Goals.

Or. en

Amendment 540Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 c (new)


Work programmes across all pillars shall set out the overall amount reserved for initiatives directed to delivering societal impact. This will include those societal challenges embodied by the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement, and be aligned with the minimum Horizon Europe budget commitment for tackling climate change.

Or. en

Amendment 541Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupMarisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 d (new)


All documents to prepare work programmes, including draft work programmes, will be posted on the public

AM\1159885EN.docx 113/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

register of Commission documents.

Or. en

Amendment 542Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part


2. The Commission shall adopt separate work programmes, by means of implementing acts, for the implementation of actions under the following components, as set out in Article 3(1) of this Decision :

2. Having consulted Member States, Associated Countries and other relevant stakeholders, the Commission shall adopt the work programmes, by means of implementing acts, for the implementation of actions under the following components, as set out in Article 3(1) of this Decision :

Or. en

Amendment 543Lieve Wierinck, Fredrick Federley, Angelika MlinarProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part


2. The Commission shall adopt separate work programmes, by means of implementing acts, for the implementation of actions under the following components, as set out in Article 3(1) of this Decision :

2. The Commission is empowered to delegated acts in accordance with Article 12a, amending Annex IIa to adopt separate work programmes, for the implementation of actions under the following components, as set out in Article 3(1) of this Decision :

Or. en

Justification

Both the European Parliament and Council should have the right to express their objection if they don't agree with the development of the different work programmes. Changing the adoption of work programmes into delegated acts, should not stall the process of the decision making.

Amendment 544Barbara Kudrycka, Krišjānis Kariņš, Jerzy Buzek, Algirdas Saudargas, Michał Boni, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Janusz LewandowskiProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 2 – point bPE625.594v01-00 114/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN


(b) all clusters under the pillar 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness', MSCA, research infrastructures, support to innovation ecosystems, sharing excellence and reforming and enhancing the European R&I System, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 12(4);

(b) all clusters under the pillar 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness', MSCA, research infrastructures, support to research and innovation ecosystems, spreading excellence and widening participation, reforming and enhancing the European R&I System, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 12(4);

Or. en

Amendment 545Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 2 – point b



(b) all clusters under the pillar 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness', MSCA, research infrastructures, support to innovation ecosystems, sharing excellence and widening participation, reforming and enhancing the European R&I System, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 12(4);

Or. en

Amendment 546Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc GambúsProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 2 – point b


(b) all clusters under the pillar 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness', MSCA, research infrastructures, support to innovation ecosystems, sharing excellence and reforming and enhancing the European R&I System, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in

(b) all clusters under the pillar 'Societal Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness', MSCA, research infrastructures, support to innovation ecosystems, sharing excellence and reforming and enhancing the European R&I System, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in

AM\1159885EN.docx 115/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Article 12(4); Article 12(4);

Or. en

Amendment 547Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 2 – point b



(b) all clusters under the pillar 'Competitiveness', MSCA, research infrastructures, support to innovation ecosystems, sharing excellence and reforming and enhancing the European R&I System, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 12(4);

Or. en



(a) an indication of the amount allocated to each action and mission and an indicative implementation timetable;

(a) an indication of the amount allocated to each action, mission and European Partnership and an indicative implementation timetable

Or. en

Amendment 549Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)


(a a) an indication of the amount and percentage the Programme is contributing to tackling climate change. The Commission will analyse why significant discrepancies (if any) arise between this

PE625.594v01-00 116/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

estimate and the aggregate estimates of funded beneficiaries in that Work programme.

Or. en

Amendment 550Rosa D'Amato, Dario TamburranoProposal for a decisionArticle 11 – paragraph 3 – point b


(b) for grants the priorities, the selection and award criteria and the relative weight of the different award criteria and the maximum rate of funding of the total eligible costs;

(b) for grants the priorities, the selection and award criteria, the relative weight of the different award criteria, and the maximum rate of funding of the total eligible costs;

Or. en

Amendment 551Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Carlos Zorrinho, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionArticle 12 a (new)


Article 12 a

Steering Board for Health

1. The Commission shall establish a Steering Board for Health for implementing the actions under Pillar II 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness' which relates to the cluster 'Health'.

2. The Steering Board for Health shall focus on the following principles: creating synergy between health research programs through coordination and cooperation, promoting patients and society engagement, with co-design and co-implementation of health missions by stakeholders, providing scientific advice and recommendations. The actions should provide value oriented health research, better health solutions and reduce health inequalities.

AM\1159885EN.docx 117/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

3. The Steering Board for Health shall:

(a) provide for citizens’ participation and engagement in a bottom-up decision making process,

(b) foster sustainability in funding strategies and mechanisms allowing for long-term projects and ambitious missions,

(c) ensure fruitful transnational research collaborations that maximize the European potential and translate results into health systems,

(d) increase the use of multidisciplinary research between disease areas where commonalities exist and thereby decrease duplication and isolated research.

(e) increase visibility of Horizon Europe and its benefit for EU citizens, address fragmentation of responsibilities for science and research within the EU governing bodies, streamline the existing funding mechanisms.

4. The Steering Board for Health shall provide a comprehensive research strategy and steering in developing the work programmes and missions related to Health, including programs in other Challenges.

5. The Steering Board for Health shall be an independent science-led stakeholder group, composed of actors from biomedical research and innovation, other relevant sectors of research and industry and with strong participation of patient representatives and citizens.

6. The Steering Board for Health shall be composed of 13 to 15/ 15 to 20 high level individuals drawn from across disciplines and activities, in the fields of research, innovation, public health and wellbeing. The members of the Steering Board for Health shall be appointed by the Commission, following an open call for nominations or for expression of interests or both, whichever the Commission will find more appropriate, and taking into account the need for balance in expertise,

PE625.594v01-00 118/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

gender, age and geographical distribution. Their term of office shall be limited to two years, renewable twice, with a rolling appointments system.

7. The Steering Board for Health shall have a chair who shall be appointed by the Commission following a transparent recruitment process. The President shall be a high profile public figure linked to the health research field.

8. The Steering Board for Health shall establish:

(a) the strategy for the the cluster 'Health'.

(b) the blueprint for steering coordination and cooperation between the health programes, related pillars, such as EIC, ERC, as well as within Strategic Partnerships and the EU structural funds. The blueprint shall ensure more visibility and coordination of the existing financial mechanisms allocated to health research, shall steer coordination and cooperation, and shall develop the work programmes and missions related to Health.

(c) the methods and procedures for designing, selecting and implementation of the health missions.

Or. en

Justification

A steering Board for Health will provide strong support for impactful research, for developing successful missions and for creating synergy between programs. The current mission boards are limited in scope while coordination and synergies need to be strengthened with a formal mechanism that will also allow developing future missions in a transparent and efficient way.

The funding needs to be aligned, coordinated between EU, Member States, and other partners if needed.

Amendment 552Lieve Wierinck, Fredrick Federley, Angelika MlinarProposal for a decisionArticle 12 a (new)


AM\1159885EN.docx 119/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Article 12 a

Exercise of the delegation

1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.

2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 11(2) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from… [the date of entry into force of this Decision].

3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 11(2) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.

4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016.

5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council.

6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 11(2) shall enter into force if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.

Or. en

PE625.594v01-00 120/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Amendment 553Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionArticle 12 a (new)


Article 12 a

Exercise of the regulation

1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.

2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 11(1) shall be conferred on the Commission until 31 December 2028.

3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 11(1) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.

4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016.

5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council.

6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 11(1) shall enter into force if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both

AM\1159885EN.docx 121/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.

Or. en

Amendment 554Jakop Dalundeon behalf of the Verts/ALE GroupProposal for a decisionAnnex I – paragraph 1


The implementation of Horizon Europe's programme-level objectives in an integrated manner will be ensured by multiannual Strategic Planning. Such planning will provide the focus on impact for the Programme overall and coherence between its different pillars, as well as synergy with other EU programmes and support to and from other EU policies.

The implementation of Horizon Europe is steered by an inclusive participatory and transparent strategic planning process of the research and innovation activities funded by the programme.

The Strategic Planning process shall lead to the implementation of Horizon Europe's programme-level objectives thereby defining the funding priorities. It will provide focus on impact for the Programme and coherence between its different pillars, as well as synergy with other EU programmes and support to other EU policies and how to leverage additional private and public money. Notably, Strategic planning shall be consistent with the Paris Agreement and the Union’s climate related long-term objective and remaining carbon budget.The strategic planning process and the adoption of the strategic R&I plan through a delegated act shall increase ownership and understanding for the purpose of the programme by a wider public and will allow the co-legislators, stakeholders and Member States to be fully informed on the envisaged initiatives and to ensure that main European policies targets, are reflected in and supported by Horizon Europe, with adequate resources. The Strategic

PE625.594v01-00 122/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Planning will help to develop and implement policy for the relevant areas covered, at EU level as well as complementing policies in the Member States and ensuring a better coordination with the EU’s priorities. It will further take into account foresight activities, studies and other scientific evidence and take account of relevant existing initiatives at EU and national level. It will allow simplification of the funding landscape, avoid duplication and overlaps between funding possibilities while leveraging additional private and public funding and promote faster dissemination and uptake of research and innovation results.In order to respond to these objectives, the Commission will launch a mandatory multi-stakeholder open consultation phase with Member States, the European Parliament, stakeholders, including civil society organisations, about the strategic priorities, under the Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness pillar, and the suitable types of instruments, including missions and the European partnerships. All partnerships and missions or any other strategic new initiative shall be identified in this Strategic R&I Plan and be subject to mandatory multi-stakeholder consultation before being implemented in work programmes. Results of consultation with Member States, the European Parliament and stakeholders shall be divulgated before any decision on future priorities, for each relevant area, is taken.The strategic planning will promote strong engagement with citizens and civil society both within the strategic planning process itself and at all other stages of research and innovation, including agenda-setting. To facilitate this, a structured dialogue will be established with civil society. The process will also promote the co-creation of knowledge,effective promotion of gender equality, including the integration of the gender dimension in research and innovation content, and will ensure and

AM\1159885EN.docx 123/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

promote Responsible Research and Innovation and adherence to the highest ethics and integrity standards.As regards European partnerships, the Strategic R&I Plan will outline and give the rationale for the creation, merge and phasing out of the European partnerships. Future partnerships funded under the second pillar ‘Global societal challenges and a net-zero GHG emission economy’, will in particular be assessed in terms of their potential to help deliver the SDGs and the Union’s climate related long-term objective and remaining carbon budget in consistency with the Paris Agreement.Building on experience in Horizon 2020, the social sciences and the humanities will be fully integrated across all clusters and work programmes, and through the development of social sciences oriented calls and specific and dedicated activities.On-going and new KICs will be defined in the legislative proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and the Council on the EIT Strategic Innovation Agenda. Nevertheless, the creation of any new KIC should be subject to an additional and adequate funding, allowing the existing KICs to develop the ecosystems, build partnerships and pursue and implement efficiently their ambitious objectives.'FET Flagships' supported under Horizon will continue to be supported under the Programme. As they present substantial analogies with missions, other 'FET flagships', if any, maybe be supported under this Framework Programme as missions geared towards future and emerging technologies.The missions should strengthen the collaborative aspects of the Programme. Where appropriate, the strategic planning process shall assess in how far European partnerships could work as supporting implementation pillars of the missions. The missions will have technological and societal elements and will be defined in close cooperation with allrelevant stakeholders, including civil society, and DGs.

PE625.594v01-00 124/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

The Strategic Planning will identify existing links between Horizon Europe and other Union Programmes, which offer possibilities for synergies between EUfunds. Horizon Europe will become a point of reference for research and innovation in all related programmes across the EU budget and non-funding instruments, in order to help deliver the EU’s political priorities and objectives. This will also promote faster dissemination and uptake of research and innovation results and avoid duplication and overlaps between funding possibilities. It will provide the frame for linking the direct research actions of the Joint Research Centre and other actions supported under the Programme, including the use of results for support to policy.

Or. en

Amendment 555Jerzy Buzek, Krišjānis Kariņš, Clare Moody, Evžen Tošenovský, Barbara Kudrycka, Michał BoniProposal for a decisionAnnex I – paragraph 1



The implementation of Horizon Europe is steered by an inclusive and transparent strategic planning process of the research and innovation activities funded by the Programme.

The Strategic Planning process shall lead to the implementation of Horizon Europe's programme-level objectives thereby defining the funding priorities. It will provide focus on impact for the Programme and coherence between its different pillars, as well as synergy with other EU programmes and support to and from other EU policies. The strategic planning process and the adoption of the

AM\1159885EN.docx 125/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

strategic R&I plan through a delegated act shall increase ownership and understanding for the purpose of the programme by a wider public and will allow the co-legislators, stakeholders and Member States to be fully informed on the envisaged initiatives. The Strategic Planning will help to develop and implement policy for the relevant areas covered, at EU level as well as complementing policies in the Member States. It will allow simplification of the funding landscape, avoid duplication and overlaps between funding possibilities and promote faster dissemination and uptake of research and innovation results.In order to respond to these objectives, the Commission will launch an open consultation phase with Member States, the European Parliament, stakeholders, including civil society organisations, about the strategic priorities including missions, under the Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness pillar, and the suitable types of instruments, in particular the European partnerships. All partnerships and missions or any other strategic new initiative shall be identified in this Strategic R&I Plan before being implemented in work programmes.As regards European partnerships, the Strategic R&I Plan will outline and give the rationale for the creation, merge and phasing out of the European partnerships. All well-established partnerships, such as the Joint Technology Initiatives, will be considered for continuation beyond 2020 due to their added-value in bringing and leveraging private investment and contribution to synergies of funds (i.e. Clean Sky has signed partnerships with 17 Member States and regions around Europe). As in Horizon 2020, proposals for Joint Undertakings will be presented as Council Regulations.On-going and new KICs will be defined in the legislative proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and the Council on the EIT Strategic Innovation Agenda.

PE625.594v01-00 126/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Nevertheless, the creation of any new KIC should entail additional and adequate budgetary resources, not to undermine the objectives and the commitments of the existing KICs. 'FET Flagships' supported under Horizon (currently Graphene Flagship, Human Brain Project, Quantum Flagship) will continue to be supported under the Programme. As they present substantial analogies with missions, other 'FET flagships', if any, maybe be supported under this Framework Programme as missions geared towards future and emerging technologies. The missions should strengthen the collaborative aspects of the Programme and reinforce existing European partnerships, which could work as supporting implementation pillars of the missions. The missions will have technological and societal elements and will be defined in close cooperation with all relevant DGs.The Strategic Planning will identify existing links between Horizon Europe and other Union Programmes, including the Euratom programme, which offer possibilities for synergies between EU funds. Horizon Europe will become a point of reference for research and innovation in all related programmes across the EU budget and non-funding instruments. This will also promote faster dissemination and uptake of research and innovation results and avoid duplication and overlaps between funding possibilities. It will provide the frame for linking the direct research actions of the Joint Research Centre and other actions supported under the Programme, including the use of results for support to policy.

Or. en

Amendment 556Barbara Kudrycka, Michał Boni, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁukacijewskaProposal for a decisionAnnex I – paragraph 1

AM\1159885EN.docx 127/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN



The implementation of Horizon Europe shall be steered by an inclusive and transparent strategic planning process of the research and innovation activities funded by the Programme. It will provide the focus on impact for the Programme and coherence between its different parts, as well as synergy with other EU programmes and support to and from other EU policies.The strategic planning process and the adoption of the strategic R&I plans, forming a part of the legal base of the Programme, will increase ownership and understanding for the purpose of the Programme by a wider public and will allow the co-legislators, stakeholders and Member States to be fully informed on the envisaged initiatives. The Strategic Planning will help to develop and implement policy for the relevant areas covered, at Union level as well as complementing policies in the Member States. It will allow the simplification of the funding landscape, avoid duplication and overlaps between funding possibilities and promote faster dissemination and uptake of research and innovation results.

Or. en

Amendment 557Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionAnnex I – paragraph 1



The implementation of Horizon Europe's programme-level objectives in an integrated manner will be ensured by inclusive and transparent multiannual Strategic Planning of research and innovation projects funded under the programme. Such planning will provide the focus on priority funding objectives, the impact for the Programme overall and coherence between its different pillars, as well as synergy with other EU programmes and

PE625.594v01-00 128/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

support to and from other EU policies.

Or. it

Justification

Transparency and consistency with EU priorities must be ensured.

Amendment 558Marian-Jean MarinescuProposal for a decisionAnnex I – paragraph 1



The implementation of the Programme in an integrated manner will be ensured by multiannual Strategic Planning. Such planning will provide the focus on impact for the Programme overall and coherence between its different pillars, as well as synergy with other EU programmes and support to and from other EU policies.

Or. en

Amendment 559Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionAnnex I – paragraph 1 a (new)


The Strategic Planning for each of the Challenges should be supported by a high-level Steering Group, science-led and composed of all relevant stakeholders.

Or. en



AM\1159885EN.docx 129/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

The Strategic Planning will promote strong engagement with citizens and civil society organisations at all stages of research and innovation, the co-creation of knowledge, effective promotion of gender equality, including the integration of the gender dimension in research and innovation content, and will ensure and promote the adherence to the highest ethics and integrity standards.

deleted

Or. en

Justification

Content transferred to AM on Annex I paragraph I

Amendment 561Patrizia ToiaProposal for a decisionAnnex I – paragraph 2


The Strategic Planning will promote strong engagement with citizens and civil society organisations at all stages of research and innovation, the co-creation of knowledge, effective promotion of gender equality, including the integration of the gender dimension in research and innovation content, and will ensure and promote the adherence to the highest ethics and integrity standards.

The Strategic Planning will promote strong engagement with citizens and civil society organisations at all stages of research, including basic and applied research, and innovation, the co-creation of knowledge, effective promotion of gender equality, including the integration of the gender dimension in research and innovation content, and will ensure and promote the adherence to the highest ethics and integrity standards.

Or. it

Justification

All research stakeholders must be represented at the planning stage.

Amendment 562Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Francesc Gambús, Marisa MatiasProposal for a decisionAnnex I – paragraph 2


The Strategic Planning will promote strong Moreover, the Strategic Planning will

PE625.594v01-00 130/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

engagement with citizens and civil society organisations at all stages of research and innovation, the co-creation of knowledge, effective promotion of gender equality, including the integration of the gender dimension in research and innovation content, and will ensure and promote the adherence to the highest ethics and integrity standards.

promote strong engagement with citizens and civil society organisations at all stages of research and innovation, the co-creation of knowledge, effective promotion of gender equality, including the integration of the gender dimension in research and innovation content, and will ensure and promote the adherence to the highest ethics and integrity standards.

Or. en



It will include extensive consultations and exchanges with Member States, the European Parliament as appropriate, and with various stakeholders about priorities, including missions, under the 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness' pillar, and the suitable types of action to use, in particular European partnerships.

deleted

Or. en

Justification

Content transferred to AM on Annex I paragraph I

Amendment 564Christian EhlerProposal for a decisionAnnex I – paragraph 3


It will include extensive consultations and exchanges with Member States, the European Parliament as appropriate, and with various stakeholders about priorities, including missions, under the 'Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness' pillar, and the suitable types of action to use, in particular European partnerships.

In order to respond to these objectives, the Commission will launch an open consultation phase with Member States, the European Parliament, stakeholders, including universities, research organisations, industry and civil society organisations, about the strategic priorities of missions, under the Global

AM\1159885EN.docx 131/132 PE625.594v01-00

EN

Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness pillar, and the suitable types of instruments, in particular the European partnerships. All partnerships and missions or any other strategic new initiative shall be defined and identified in this Strategic R&I Plan before being implemented in work programmes. Industry needs to be strongly involved in formulating the criteria and conditions for the selection, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and phasing-out of the European Partnerships.

Or. en

PE625.594v01-00 132/132 AM\1159885EN.docx

EN

Documents

· Web view{ITRE}Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2018/0225(COD)