circabc.europa.eu · Web view1st ad-hoc meeting on the update of the document on “The key concepts on Article 7(4) of the Birds Directive” (periods of pre-nuptial migration

DRAFT minutes of the meeting

1st ad-hoc meeting on the update of the document on “The key concepts on Article 7(4) of the Birds Directive” (periods of pre-nuptial migration and reproduction)

21 May 2019, DG Environment, Brussels1

Participants: BE, BG, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, HR, HU, IT, LT, PL, RO, SK, UK, BirdLife, FACE, DG ENV and N2K Group (EC consultants). The meeting was chaired by Micheal O’Briain, DG ENV.

1. Introduction (Michael O’Briain, DG ENV)

The current updating work is a commitment from the Nature Action Plan (Action 1). The initial work dates back to 2001 when the general principles were established. The whole exercise was triggered by the 1994 ruling of the ECJ2 which provided interpretation on Article 7(4), the pre-nuptial migration and the system of complete protection. We need to be faithful to this ruling as well as to the precautionary principle. The need for a periodic review of this document has already been recognized and the better the knowledge we have the more effectively the provisions of Article 7(4) can be applied. DG ENV said that the title of the KCD document will be changed to have a more understandable name. While Member States are responsible for taking decisions on hunting, this exercise would not be credible unless there is a coherence test and a clear understanding of the reasons causing apparent inconsistencies.

The purpose of the first expert meeting is to discuss the issues that have emerged using 10 species by way of example. It was also underlined that this is a technical meeting, not a political one. It is first of all addressed to MS but comments from stakeholders are welcomed. The outcomes of the meeting should be applicable to other species not discussed in this meeting. A second meeting might be needed but this can be decided at a later stage. The Commission reminded that if a MS has not provided data on a huntable species because of lack of knowledge about the start/end of the migration and/or reproduction, no hunting of this species should be allowed in the territory of that MS, since there would be no basis to comply with Article 7(4)

2. Presentation of the method to assess Member States’ submissions: Completeness check and Coherence check

Presentation was given by Otars Opermanis, N2K Group. The presentation is available through this link https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/3d8d8ea6-566c-4f21-9fa8-11a7d05fda00. It was reminded that developing the criteria for the coherence assessment is largely experimental as it was done for the first time. Only 10 MS sent information on corrections and explanations on national data during the consultation period on the coherence assessment ahead of the meeting (April-May 2019)3.

DG ENV underlines that it was highlighted since the start of this exercise that data have to be based on best available scientific data. It is also acknowledged that different countries have used different data and methodologies to define the KC relevant periods and some data/methodologies are likely to be more robust than others. However, comparing methodologies used by MS was not possible in the current exercise. The highest weight should be given to the most robust data. The country pairs (comparison of the reported periods by pairs of neighbouring countries) used in the coherence assessment is designed as an input for the discussion (see attached table in annex).

Main comments by the experts:

1 Version 2 further to clarifications and corrections proposed by FACE and ISPRA. 06/08/20192 http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-435/92 3 In the Excel file (20190415 Dates_start of migration and reproduction File 1) aimed at supporting the assessment between neighbouring MS, a country pair (Sl-HR) was missing and can be added, as well as other country pairs if requested

1

https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/3d8d8ea6-566c-4f21-9fa8-11a7d05fda00

http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-435/92


- FACE requested whether the definitions of the periods are open for discussion as some new science advances our knolwedge. DG ENV confirmed that the definitions and principles presented in the current KCD document will not be changed, since there is no basis to do that.

- BirdLife requested to include a pairing between CY and BG. N2K Group responded that in principle it can be added in the Excel tables.

- Italy raised a point on correctness of the used migration routes in the coherence assessment (a direction NE-SW was always assumed while this might not be true for some species) and on the length of reproduction periods in the South (longer) and the North (shorter) of the EU. N2K Group explained that the directions are indeed simplified in this exercise and this is explained in the note 4. The only practical use of the chosen migration routes (points on the maps) is for measuring distances and the global assessment is not dependent on distances. Variation in reproduction periods is acknowledged in the exercise as well (multiple factors affect length of reproduction periods).

- Poland commented that different methodologies might have been applied concerning the percentage of the population which have ended reproduction/started migration (95-90-80%). FR suggested that a certain common threshold could be agreed at EU level, since for example 1% pf the population can make a difference of 1-2 decades. DG ENV responded that the 1994 ECJ ruling confirmed that a certain percentage of the population cannot be left outside of the complete protection period; there is therefore no discretion on this matter. However, as is already recognised in the KCD document extreme erratic data should not be taken into account and the so called “theoretical overlap” also gives some flexibility.

- Italy commented that it might be possible to accept that given the statistic nature of assessments there is 95 % probability (degree of confidence) that migration has started in a certain decade. This would be scientifically correct and in line with the Court ruling.

3. Discussion on a selection of most striking discrepancies between Member States as regards pre-nuptial or reproduction periods

A presentation was given by Marita Arvela, N2K Group. The presentation is available through this link https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/3d8d8ea6-566c-4f21-9fa8-11a7d05fda00. The following species, representing different taxonomic groups of huntable species listed in the BD, were proposed by DG ENV to be discussed in the meeting: Anas crecca, Aythya fuligula, Anser anser, Tetrao (Lyrurus) tetrix, Scolopax rusticola, Gallinago gallinago, Streptopelia turtur, Turdus pilaris, Turdus merula and Turdus philomelos.

Each discussed species included a table where country pairs were shown in green, orange and red colours (one table for the spring migration and one for end of reproduction) as well as a map per species showing reported decades for all MS. The cases where MS have submitted corrections during the April-May consultation period were indicated in these tables (but not on the maps). The discussion concentrated in discrepancies coloured with red and orange. DG ENV highlighted that each example has a wider relevance for the whole family of the species. For most families, there are major discrepancies for almost 100% of the huntable species of the family.

Tetrao (Lyrurus) tetrix, Black Grouse

Start of reproduction period (SRP)

4 Data collection and analysis for 2018/2019 update of the document on periods of spring migration and reproduction (Key Concepts Document, KCD)

2

https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/3d8d8ea6-566c-4f21-9fa8-11a7d05fda00


- PL: The difference of 4 decades with SK and CZ is a question of quality of data. PL is ok with 3rd decade of March (start of lekking) instead of the 3rd of April. DE: only 4-5 not connected populations are present in Germany. Most of the data comes from the Alps. Spotted distribution. According to the DE expert, it is not appropriate to compare DE and SE. This species is not hunted in DE. DG ENV commented that in such cases it is important to set the earliest starting date for reproduction at national level.

- UK: No new data for the whole country. Data for the whole UK should be used.- FR: Criteria for the start of the reproduction may be different (laying first eggs or start of lekking), which

could explain 1-2 decades of difference. DG ENV: The criteria should follow the ones used in the 2014 KCD (courtship display on lek sites, 4 decades before egg laying).

Conclusion: DG ENV took notes of the few changes and explanations proposed and reminded that MS which are absent and highlighted in RED in the tables with traffic light colours should also provide explanations. DG ENV also highlighted the need to re-assess the data provided, in light of the discussion (e.g. on the percentage of the population which have ended reproduction/started migration) and taking into account the precautionary principle whenever there is lack of solid data.

End of reproduction (2014: 8 decades after hatching)

- N2K Group explained that discrepancies are also observed in MSs which did not submit new data, such as FI-EE.

- DE: not a common species in certain parts of DE and biology might be changing which can explain differences.

- FI: a common species, population of about 700.000 individuals.

Conclusion: there might be differences in biology if a species is abundant or rare. Concerns about CZ and AT data. However, the new AT data not yet part of the draft EU database. DG ENV stressed the need to get clear explanations on the reasons for the discrepancies and to re-assess the data in light of the discussion at the meeting.

Anas crecca, Common Teal

Start of migration

- N2K group presented some correction proposed by NL (from MIG7 to MIG6) and BE (from MIG8 to MIG6).

- BE: big difference with LU is likely due to insufficient data of LU (i.e. Luxembourg probably does not have significant areas for water birds).

- IT: Several dataset used (ringing, bag data, GPS, count data, satellite) provide a solid basis for MIG2. There are recoveries of FR (Camargue) birds in IT (Po valley). At the same time, there are both migration movements and non-migration (late wintering) movements. In Northern IT, two presence peaks (November/December and January) are observed, not three. In Sicily, only one peak, since it is a wintering area and birds leave Sicily early January. Males start migrating 4 weeks earlier than females.

- FR: the direction of movement is important; in France it is considered that spring migration starts when movements towards the North exceed movements towards the South (early February). Earlier movements detected in January go in all directions, so they are considered to be dispersion of birds for

3


food research or late wintering movements. Methodology includes ringing data. No difference between sexes detected.

- IT: the authors of the paper used by FR to define their periods recognize that movements towards the South do not preclude also movements towards N-E. Furthermore, the paper does not consider sex differences, which can go up to 4 weeks.

- ES: Complex issue also linked to hunting dates. Since hunting stops in mid-January in ES, there are obviously no ring recoveries after that date.

- IT informed about the new Bird Migration Atlas of Europe. Publication for huntable species will come first (online) within the next 6 months. Offers best analysis on birds’ movements in Europe. Pattern of movements will be described very well for huntable birds. Tested in Italy.

- DG ENV suggested IT to share details about the draft Atlas and the methodology being used in it, noting that ringing data seems to be central to the discussion.

- DK: admits that it is difficult to determine first movements of migration due to many local movements occurring. Birds arrive from the Wadden Sea. The DK experts agreed to correct the data from decade 5 to decade 6.

- FACE: Some movements are not migratory (as stated in the 2014 KCD). Movements in January are most linked to weather-related conditions. No data concluding January migration in Italy. There are such movements (Camargue to IT) already in December. There is no observed increase of population in January, while there is an increase in February. Satellite radio transmitter study shows migration in February (from IT to East Europe). EuroBirdsPortal data are consistent with the start of migration in February. Ring recoveries in IT are coherent with FR (best order of use of sources: peer reviewed study, then ring recoveries, then EuroBirdsPortal). FACE stated that movements towards the south cannot be considered as the start of migration.

- DG ENV underlined the importance that this a science-based exercise and that, as there is no one agreed definitive methodology, DG ENV relies on MS expertise and competence in the weighting that they give to use of different sources.

- IT: Referred to another FR paper analysing autumn migration and highlighting an earlier start. Artificial feeding in Camargue has changed the wintering movements. There were more movements without feeding. IT commented on FACE’s point: GPS tracking concerns mainly females and these dates are in line with ISPRA data. Going out to wintering sites is the first step of migration.

- BirdLife: Birdlife partners were not involved in the submission of data of GR and BG. A need for a correction was highlighted as follows: 3rd decade in GR and 4th in BG. DG ENV indicated the need for scientific underpinning of such proposals and to contact Member States authorities in that respect.

Conclusion: No consensus between IT, FR (and FACE). DG ENV invited FR and IT to share the data/evidence

that they have used as well as scientific studies (with copy to DG ENV) and to discuss in view of finding either an agreement or an agreed explanation of the apparent discrepancy.

IT was invited to share the details and methodology of the migration atlas with the expert group (important to understand the methodology and to allow MS to comment it if it is to be applied in the KCD update).

End of reproduction

- N2K Group said that no correction were sent so far by MSs and highlighted the discrepancy of 6 decades between BG and RO which is difficult to understand

- HR: “no data” on the map means that the species is not breeding in HR.

4


- PL: referred to the definition of end of reproduction. In PL it is the end of incubation. Considers changing the data from decade 18 to decade 21.

- DG ENV recalled the definition in the current KCD, i.e. full flight of young birds. The principles have been established by the Court of justice who also considered the risk of confusion and disturbance. The Court ruling applies to start of migration, but the same principle can be extended to the end of reproduction.

- FACE: confirmed that there is no aim to shoot ducklings, but such new science shows that with some species females can be shot when the young birds are independent with no impact on young as they are independent.

- IT: Ducklings not only independent when they can feed. They need to moult as well. Moulting needs to be taken into account in the reproduction period.

- LT: recalled that a small percentage of birds end reproduction later. It agreed to change for 3 rd decade of July.

- RO: acknowledged that no new data was submitted. The next Article 12 reporting will possibly provide new sources of information. BG, HR and HU authorities will be contacted, however RO considers that RO data are ok.

- BG: indicated that no new data is available. Does not know reason for the big difference between BG and RO and will engage with RO authorities.

Conclusion: Theend of reproduction is the full flight of the young birds as in the KCD. This is in line with the

ECJ ruling which also recognises the risk of confusion and disturbance. Clear audit is needed on how MS determined a certain date (explanation must be provided). Some MS should further reflect on adjustments. DG ENV will remind absent MS that the duty

applies to all MS (in particular if hunting allowed). If no solutions found those cases should be tackled through further exchanges.

Aythya fuligula, Tufted Duck

Start of migration

- N2K Group presented some corrections proposed by LV (from decade 11 to decade 8), NL (from 9 to 6) and HR (from 6 to 5).

- DE: LU does not have big staging areas thus quality of data in LU is probably poorer.- DK: has not seen SE data, thus difficult to assess. Probably can be explained with biology: birds stay few

weeks in DK before mowing north.- BirdLife: CZ stands out with the decade 7. - HR: confirms that it will align its reported decade with other countries.

Conclusion: SE should comment on the coherence assessment. If BirdLife has scientific explanation concerning CZ, it is invited to provide it.

End of reproduction

- N2K Group presented some corrections proposed by PL (from decade 20 to 24) and LV (from 24 to 23) and highlighted that there are no new data in many MSs

- FI: corrected the reported decade from 25 to 24 .

5


- ES: highlighted that there are very few records in Southern ES and the species is very scarce also in the North. Therefore data is not robust. The same for the pheasant for which no data have been provided.

- DG ENV: reminded that if a species is hunted, MS should have the data. - UK: The decade should be Sept 3 for all UK regions.- DK: recent data (citizen science) support 2nd decade of Sept (decade 26). The age of ducklings is

estimated by observers. The last 2,5% of the population was however cut out. - IT: has not revised data because no hunting and very few breeding pairs in IT. - HR: highlighted that there are very few breeders in HR which makes it difficult to set the date for end of

reproduction.- UK: highlighted that there are not enough data at “country level” for some species. It has looked at age

of chicks (as in DK). - NL: maybe reported too early date. A revised decade will probably be submitted.

Conclusion: FI is asked to provide a scientific basis for the proposed change. If a species is spreading and hunted, it is even more important to provide the periods. SK (reporting Aug2) to clarify the difference with neighbouring MS as biologically it is hard to

understand the difference.

Anser anser, Greylag Goose

Start of migration

- N2K Group highlighted that this species is huntable in all MSs and according to the Artemis database it is hunted in 17 MSs. Some corrections have been proposed by NL (from decade 1 to 4)

- DE: indicated that the main source of data is the bird portal but published data and ring recoveries were also used. DE Confirmed the date JAN1 (could even be December) but explained the difficulties due to few migratory specimens (in Eastern DE) and backwards movements. More data are available on non-migratory birds.

- DG ENV reminded that even though there are both resident and migrants in a country, this updating exercise still applies.

- NL: highlighted that there is a decreasing population of migratory birds. It is therefore harder to pick up the real migration period: some movements start in January but it is unclear what is migration and what is winter movement the date when all birds go to north is the 4 th decade. There is a question of definition of the start of migration. There is a lot of data (collared ringing) that could be used to better understand movements. DE: agrees with NL on the difficulty to determine the start of migration. Could start of nesting be the starting point?

- DK: In Febr1 (4th decade) there is increase in numbers in Wadden Sea. There are so many geese in DK that it is difficult to detect movements of a small number of birds. DG ENV suggested that other type of sources might be used, e:g: ringing data . The NL highlighted that there are hundreds of individuals with GPS in the NL and this data can be used to shed light on the period.

- FI: the breeding population is not well known. Lack of information on the population to which the Anser anser belongs to (further research on-going). In SE, there are wintering Anser anser.

Conclusion: When there is a migratory component involved i.e. mixed migratory and resident populations,

updating of the pre-nuptial migration applies for those mixed populations as well. It is agreed that this is a complex issue. DG ENV suggested to look further the ringing data, in

particular in DK and to have further conversation between NL, BE, DE, DK and SE.

6


End of reproduction

- N2K Group presented some corrections proposed by FI (from 21 to 22) LV (from 20 to 21) and highlighted that no data was submitted by PT, ES, UKN, EL.

- DE: highlighted the difficulties in determining the end of reproduction period, like for the start of migration. Data is reliable but refers to a mixture of breeding and resident birds. There is breeding even in winter in towns. There might be different views on the start of the independence (debate is on-going).

- UK: No new data for IE (2014 data used). - PL: highlighted a different definition used but cannot explain the big difference between PL and

neighbours- HR: explained that this is a rare breeder, which is not hunted. HR has been in contact with Sl.- ES: explained that this species is not breeding in ES and suggested that this situation should be

described differently on the map as compared to no data provided. ES said it will submit data on all other species, including the not huntable ones.

- RO said there is lack of data- BG expressed no comments on the apparent discrepancies- LV (Otars): confirms that 21th decade is good. - NL and BE confirm their reported decades (lot of data behind).

Conclusion: ES will send dates for non-huntable species as well. IE is invited to revisit its data. PL is invited to further reflect on the data and make adjustments as appropriate. RO and HU are invited to share data and find an agreement either on a date or on an explanation

for the discrepancies . Although accepting that there can be outliers, urban populations, changes in behaviour, there is

still a need to revisit the data. The KCD will differentiate “no data” due to absence of data and “no data” due to bird not

breeding in a country (ref. maps).

Scolopax rusticola, Woodcock

Start of migration

- N2K Group presented a correction proposed by the NL (from 11 to 8)- NL: stated that no migration data is available, therefore reproduction dates have been used.- UK: will confirm with IE on the current reported data.- IT: Confirm its data (decade 2) although admits that is a difficult species. NE, central, and islands have

different patterns. Sardinia is a wintering place. The peak is decreasing in December but not clear where birds go. Central IT: two peaks (autumn migration in December and mid-January). The second peak is the start of the migration. North-East (Veneto): peak in Feb 2. Hunting bags and ringing data confirm each other.

- FACE: Radio tracking study shows that it is Feb3 but it is criticized by ISPRA. In March, there are still lot of woodcocks in IT. Peak of movements are observed in March, but also in April. Decrease in harvest from Dec 2 but does not mean that it is the start of the migration. Plenty of evidence supporting Feb3. Harvest data is not a good source because of a decreasing hunting effort by the big number of

7


generalist hunters in December and January. The decrease starts in December so if that means start of migration, this should be stated in mid-December and not in January.

- IT: the GPS study used by FACE cannot be used because the birds were marked in February (and they start migrating in January). Birds need at least two weeks to get adapted to the GPS (no conclusion can be raised on the 1st year and only small sample the second year). No more woodcock are observed in Sardinia after early January. Movements from Sicily to Tuscany can be migration. There are birds coming from the Balkans but most birds move to the North as from mid-January. A study starting in 1993 shows that migration is finished in March.

- FR: radio data refers to a study in Britany (100 birds). There is no knowledge on southern FR. There is a clear gradient from ES to FR. Similar case than with Teal. Need to evaluate the direction of movements in IT. Birds tagged in February.

- IT: Movements from Sicily to Tuscany are observed but their migratory character is still to be confirmed.

- ES: said that IT and FR should have splitted their territories considering the differences.- FACE: there is no data supporting movements within IT. There are movements from the Balkans. - DG ENV was surprised to learn that there are no other studies in FR than from Brittany. - FR: said that it is ready to engage in a study with ES and IT using ring recovering. “First captures” (as

used by IT) is not an indication of migration. There are movements within FR. Important to look at the direction of the movement (as for the Teal).

- HR: wintering in HR on the coast. No data on migration but further look could be possible based on hunting bags.

Conclusion: Clarity needed from countries which are absent. The precautionary principle needs to underpin

decisions. Migration = a movement towards the breeding ground (even though birds do not cross borders),

i.e. it is purposeful movement. Further reflect on the possibility to split a MS into two but it should not delay the update. The

same rules apply (data needed for sub-parts of MS). FR should not only rely on the study carried out in Brittany, FR invited to look at ring recoveries

and to have a dialogue with IT and ES to get further insight on spring migration. IT invited to clarify views between ISPRA and FACE and FR. HR: have a precautionary approach and further investigation would be welcomed.

End of reproduction

- N2K Group said no corrections were submitted so farPL: wishes to correct its reported decade from 20 to 24th decade

- UK: said that there is probably an error in the definition of the end of reproduction in IE (Sept3).- FACE: expressed the same concern for Snipe as for the Woodcock in IE- DE: said that this species is difficult to observe (fledglings)- LT: recognized a mistake and corrected the data from 21 to 23 - DK: stated that there is a lack of data and very old studies have been used. DG ENV suggested carrying

out some further studies. DK said that this would be difficult considering that finding nests is difficult (DE agrees).

Conclusion:It is in everyone’s interest to have this right including hunters.

8


IE to look at their data, also at the definition of end reproduction (idem for Snipe). Some knowledge gaps will remain but there is a need to share available information.

Streptopelia turtur, Turtle Dove

Start of migration

N2K Group presented some corrections made by NL (from 10 to 11) and highlighted the big discrepancies DE-LU and FR-LU (10 decades).

DG ENV highlighted that LU should comment on this in writing since is absent. Conclusion:

RO needs to reflect the big difference with HU and GR. ES needs to further explain its reported decade.

End of reproduction

- ES: has a lot of data. The breeding starts earlier in ES and ends earlier. One brood/year. - HU: said that reported data (27) has been confirmed by BirdLife and they do not wish to change it. - BG: has more recent data. Will correct it and align with RO and GR (21) on the basis of a study from

the 90s. DG ENV stressed that corrections should be based on more recent scientific sources and it is highly questionable to correct data based on such older studies.

- HR: stated that there is lack of data but this is not a big problem since this species is not huntable. - NL: recently the breeding season has shortened (depleted population).- RO: suggested that HU could change its data since there is a good alignment between RO, EL and BG.- DG ENV: In case of poor data, it is necessary to follow the precautionary principle and to go to the

country having the best data. Maybe HU can share its data with RO covering the eastern part of the country.

- DE: said that there are less birds but more observers. However data are not robust .

Conclusion: Make clear on the maps that the species is not breeding in IE and SE (“no data”). If BG makes an adjustment, the change should be justified. RO can align with BG if good reason to change in BG. RO is invited to discuss with HU too. Changes should be done based on up-to-date scientific data. If changes are based on old

references, an explanation is needed. . It is critical to have robust data for the 10 MS where Turtle Dove is hunted. EL should comment on the discrepancies

Turdus philomelos, Song thrush

Start of migration

- N2K Group presented the correction by HU (from 6 to 4).- IT: Analysis is solid as based on three different and large datasets (1 st captures, ring recoveries and

hunting bags). Definition of migration is an issue. There is a “loop migration”. Birds go to S IT and N Africa and then come back to the N via Sardinia already end of December and then go to Liguria early January. Thus never stops during winter. Is this movement a real migration or not?

9


- FACE: Opposes migration in January, it is a movement for food resources, not migration. Migration in Feb1 or Feb2. There is a book of ISPRA that describes loop movement as motivated by food search. Radio transmitter studies and ringing published research show that birds leave towards N in mid-Feb. The peak of hunting data is mid Dec. If the summit of the peak is the start of migration, then it should be in Dec. Proposes Feb1 for whole IT. This would be consistent with other MSs. In January, movements from N to S (based on Ispra study). FACE has the same concern with the fieldfare.

- IT: Loop migration is regular. Start of the reproduction period for trans-Saharian birds is when they leave the most Southern points. The same for thrushes. When the birds leave Sardinia, they stop in the Po valley and then few decades later in the Alps (they reduce speed in the Alps). The upcoming bird atlas will clarify the issue.

- FR: Confirms its reported decade. Consensus with LPO. Has same comments as for the Woodcock. Gaps can only be explained by different interpretations, not biologically. It would be good to share the data of FR, IT, ES and work together.

- ES: Start of migration is when birds leave the wintering grounds. It agrees with FR.

Conclusion: IT and FACE to share their analysis with the expert group (can be uploaded on CIRCABC). The following questions remain open: when does a loop migration become migration? Where are

birds going? Is a loop migration “real” migration? Still to be decided. Discussion between neighbouring countries is necessary including for GR and MT.

End of reproduction

- N2K Group stated that EL confirmed submitted data (21)PL: said that there is fragmentary information and expressed willingness to correct data in order to align it with DE and LT. DG ENV said that on the basis of the previous discussion there might be a need to adjust also data for other species

- BE: said that 2nd or 3rd brood is taken into account in BE but not in NL. - NL: said that it will double check and get in touch with BE.- HU said it might go to decade July3 but need to double check. - UK: will check with IE.- RO will talk to HU and SK. - FACE has the same concern for the fieldfare.

Conclusions: UK to check with IE. EE needs to check the coherence results. BE and NL to discuss with each other.

Any other species issues

UK: To check why “R” instead of “M” is used for the start of the migration of Snipe. FACE: has concerns also on Quail, Redwing, Pochard. Might engage with some MS. BirdLife: breeding bird atlas will be published first. Has concerns about some species. FR requested to have all maps in one document. This can be checked. SI requested to have the corrected tables available.

10


4. Final conclusions and way forward

DG ENV highlighted that the same principles apply to all species as for the above 7 species addressed at the meeting. It is important to reflect more widely the differences than just the country pairs (see the maps). All MSs are invited to share data and make reference information widely available.

All MS (whether present in the meeting or not) should make an effort to improve coherence. Currently, there is no EU dataset. There is no migration atlas with an agreed methodology yet. MS were asked to study the major discrepancies and to further reflect of any adjustments within the

next 6 weeks. MS were encouraged to discuss with neighbours and to find agreements either on adjustments needed or on an explanation for the discrepancies for all species. If a MS wishes, it can copy the Commission when it is in contact with neighbouring MS.

If Member States have reasons to change the data previously submitted, the same Word table used in the April-May consultation should be used. The ten Member States having already submitted a feedback should add their comments to the previous submission, marked in red. Member States should also explain apparent major discrepancies in case they see no reason to change data, on the basis on the best available sources and exchanges with neighbouring Member States.MS are invited to inform the Commission about other possible “problematic species” not addressed at the meeting.

The Commission will assess the progress before deciding on a potential 2nd meeting. Information (including studies) from MS and stakeholders will be made available on CIRCABC

https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/f2e9245c-7a03-4213-a95a-dca2a2afbfcb. Italy is invited to share information on the Migration Atlas, especially as regards the methodology being

applied, to see how it could help in this exercise. It is up to MS to use the best available scientific data and to recognize data gaps requiring further

investigations. MS should apply the precautionary principle if their data is poor. It was recognised that the identification of the migratory component in the mixed migratory and

resident populations is a complex issue. However, MS are still expected to update the period of pre-nuptial migration for these mixed populations. Sharing data/carrying out common analysis may be helpful.

Loop migration requires further investigations. E.g. IT is invited to share its information on this issue. Stakeholders are requested to be in contact with MS rather than with the Commission about national

data. The Commission will provide feedback from the expert meeting at the NADEG meeting of 23 May. N2K Group to add clarification on “no data” legend of the maps in case a species is not breeding in a

country. ---

11

https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/f2e9245c-7a03-4213-a95a-dca2a2afbfcb


Annex: Comparisons of reported periods between neighbouring countries

Border ISO codes of countries in country-pair with common border (incl. marine). Country with more S/SW position appears first (with few exceptions)

Species name

Scientific name

Country1 First country (see "Border" above). N.B. 3 countries are split in parts: ES (ESC, ESS, ESN), UK (UKS, UKN) and FI (FIS, FIN)

Country2 Second country (see "Border" above)Mig1_Rep1 Numeric decade used for comparison for Country 1 (1= Jan1, ..., 36= Dec3). #N/A = absent

or not reportedMig2_Rep2 Numeric decade used for comparison for Country 2 (1= Jan1, ..., 36= Dec3) #N/A = absent

or not reportedData use 1 Type of data used for comparison for Country 1: M - start of prenuptial migration; R - start

of reproductionData use 2 Type of data used for comparison for Country 2: M - start of prenuptial migration; R - start

of reproductionDifference Mig2_Rep2 minus Mig1_Rep1 Distance Distance (km) between sounthermost (S/SW) points of countries 1 and 2

Start of migration (or start of reproduction for resident species)

Border Species name Mig1_Rep1 Mig2_Rep2 Data use 1

Data use 2

Difference Distance

BE_NL Anser anser 4 = 4 1 > 4 M M -3 140AT_DE Anser anser 3 1 M M -2 130FR_DE Anser anser 3 = 3 1 M M -2 860FR_LU Anser anser 3 = 3 1 M M -2 910DK_SE Anser anser 4 3 M M -1 270ESN_FR Anser anser 4 3 M M -1 550HR_HU Anser anser 5 4 M M -1 300HU_SK Anser anser 4 3 M M -1 200IE_UKN Anser anser 8 7 M M -1 360IT_AT Anser anser 4 3 M M -1 1010IT_FR Anser anser 4 3 M M -1 280LV_EE Anser anser 8 7 M M -1 280RO_HU Anser anser 5 4 M M -1 190SI_AT Anser anser 4 3 M M -1 120AT_CZ Anser anser 3 3 M M 0 300AT_SK Anser anser 3 3 M M 0 280CZ_SK Anser anser 3 3 M M 0 260DE_LU Anser anser 1 1 M M 0 250EE_FIS Anser anser 7 7 M M 0 300FIS_FIN Anser anser 7 7 M M 0 390IT_SI Anser anser 4 4 M M 0 880SI_HU Anser anser 4 4 M M 0 270UKS_UKN Anser anser 7 7 M M 0 460AT_HU Anser anser 3 4 M M 1 220BG_RO Anser anser 4 5 R M 1 380

12


ESS_ESN Anser anser 3 4 M M 1 490FR_BE Anser anser 3 = 3 4 = 4 M M 1 880IT_HR Anser anser 4 5 M M 1 720PL_LT Anser anser 5 6 M M 1 640PT_ESN Anser anser 3 4 M M 1 400UKS_IE Anser anser 7 8 M M 1 330CZ_PL Anser anser 3 5 M M 2 250DE_CZ Anser anser 1 3 M M 2 460DE_SE Anser anser 1 3 M M 2 940LT_LV Anser anser 6 8 M M 2 220SK_PL Anser anser 3 5 M M 2 210DE_DK Anser anser 1 4 M M 3 820LU_BE Anser anser 1 4 = 4 M M 3 10NL_DK Anser anser 1 > 4 4 M M 3 520DE_PL Anser anser 1 5 M M 4 670FR_UKS Anser anser 3 = 3 7 M M 4 830


Data use 2

Difference Distance

DE_LU Anas crecca 6 1 M M -5 250FR_LU Anas crecca 4 = 4 1 M M -3 910CZ_SK Anas crecca 6 4 M M -2 260NL_DK Anas crecca 7 > 6 5 M M -2 520BE_NL Anas crecca 8 > 6 7 > 6 M M -1 140BG_RO Anas crecca 6 5 M M -1 380DE_DK Anas crecca 6 5 M M -1 820HR_HU Anas crecca 5 = 5 4 M M -1 300LV_EE Anas crecca 10 9 M M -1 280MT_IT Anas crecca 3 2 M M -1 100RO_HU Anas crecca 5 4 M M -1 190UKS_IE Anas crecca 5 4 M M -1 330AT_HU Anas crecca 4 4 M M 0 220AT_SK Anas crecca 4 4 M M 0 280DE_CZ Anas crecca 6 6 M M 0 460EE_FIS Anas crecca 9 9 M M 0 300ESN_FR Anas crecca 4 4 = 4 M M 0 550FIS_FIN Anas crecca 9 9 M M 0 390HU_SK Anas crecca 4 4 M M 0 200SI_AT Anas crecca 4 4 M M 0 120SI_HU Anas crecca 4 4 M M 0 270UKS_UKN Anas crecca 5 5 M M 0 460CZ_PL Anas crecca 6 7 M M 1 250DE_PL Anas crecca 6 7 M M 1 670ESS_ESN Anas crecca 3 4 M M 1 490FR_UKS Anas crecca 4 = 4 5 M M 1 830IE_UKN Anas crecca 4 5 M M 1 360PL_LT Anas crecca 7 8 M M 1 640PT_ESN Anas crecca 3 4 M M 1 400

13


SE_FIS Anas crecca 8 9 M M 1 770AT_CZ Anas crecca 4 6 M M 2 300AT_DE Anas crecca 4 6 M M 2 130DE_SE Anas crecca 6 8 M M 2 940FR_DE Anas crecca 4 6 M M 2 860GR_BG Anas crecca 4 = 4 6 M M 2 720IT_AT Anas crecca 2 4 M M 2 1010IT_FR Anas crecca 2 4 = 4 M M 2 280IT_GR Anas crecca 2 4 = 4 M M 2 630IT_SI Anas crecca 2 4 M M 2 880LT_LV Anas crecca 8 10 M M 2 220CY_GR Anas crecca 1 4 = 4 M M 3 700DK_SE Anas crecca 5 8 M M 3 270IT_HR Anas crecca 2 5 M M 3 720SK_PL Anas crecca 4 7 M M 3 210FR_BE Anas crecca 4 8 > 6 M M 4 880LU_BE Anas crecca 1 8 > 6 M M 7 10


Data use 2

Difference Distance

CZ_SK Aythya fuligula 7 3 M M -4 260DE_LU Aythya fuligula 5 1 M M -4 250FR_LU Aythya fuligula 5 1 M M -4 910LV_EE Aythya fuligula 11 > 8 8 M M -3 280NL_DK Aythya fuligula 9 > 6 6 R M -3 520UKS_IE Aythya fuligula 7 4 M M -3 330CZ_PL Aythya fuligula 7 5 M M -2 250HR_HU Aythya fuligula 6 > 5 4 M M -2 300AT_SK Aythya fuligula 4 3 M M -1 280GR_BG Aythya fuligula 6 5 M M -1 720HU_SK Aythya fuligula 4 3 M M -1 200RO_HU Aythya fuligula 5 4 M M -1 190SE_FIS Aythya fuligula 9 8 M M -1 770AT_HU Aythya fuligula 4 4 M M 0 220BG_RO Aythya fuligula 5 5 M M 0 380DE_PL Aythya fuligula 5 5 M M 0 670EE_FIS Aythya fuligula 8 8 M M 0 300ESS_ESN Aythya fuligula 4 4 M M 0 490FIS_FIN Aythya fuligula 8 8 M M 0 390FR_DE Aythya fuligula 5 5 M M 0 860IT_AT Aythya fuligula 4 4 M M 0 1010IT_SI Aythya fuligula 4 4 M M 0 880PT_ESN Aythya fuligula 4 4 M M 0 400SI_AT Aythya fuligula 4 4 M M 0 120SI_HU Aythya fuligula 4 4 M M 0 270UKS_UKN Aythya fuligula 7 7 M M 0 460AT_DE Aythya fuligula 4 5 M M 1 130DE_DK Aythya fuligula 5 6 M M 1 820

14


ESN_FR Aythya fuligula 4 5 M M 1 550FR_BE Aythya fuligula 5 6 M M 1 880IT_FR Aythya fuligula 4 5 M M 1 280DE_CZ Aythya fuligula 5 7 M M 2 460FR_UKS Aythya fuligula 5 7 M M 2 830IT_GR Aythya fuligula 4 6 M M 2 630IT_HR Aythya fuligula 4 6 > 5 M M 2 720PL_LT Aythya fuligula 5 7 M M 2 640SK_PL Aythya fuligula 3 5 M M 2 210AT_CZ Aythya fuligula 4 7 M M 3 300BE_NL Aythya fuligula 6 9 > 6 M R 3 140DK_SE Aythya fuligula 6 9 M M 3 270IE_UKN Aythya fuligula 4 7 M M 3 360DE_SE Aythya fuligula 5 9 M M 4 940LT_LV Aythya fuligula 7 11 > 8 M M 4 220CY_GR Aythya fuligula 1 6 M M 5 700LU_BE Aythya fuligula 1 6 M M 5 10

Border Species name Mig1_Rep1

Mig2_Rep2

Data use 1

Data use 2

Difference

Distance

DE_SE Tetrao tetrix 11 7 R R -4 940PL_LT Tetrao tetrix 12 8 R R -4 640DE_CZ Tetrao tetrix 11 8 R R -3 460AT_CZ Tetrao tetrix 10 8 R R -2 300AT_SK Tetrao tetrix 10 8 R R -2 280FR_BE Tetrao tetrix 11 10 R R -1 880IT_SI Tetrao tetrix 9 8 R R -1 880CZ_SK Tetrao tetrix 8 8 R R 0 260EE_FIS Tetrao tetrix 9 9 R R 0 300FIS_FIN Tetrao tetrix 9 9 R R 0 390FR_DE Tetrao tetrix 11 = 11 11 R R 0 860LT_LV Tetrao tetrix 8 8 R R 0 220AT_DE Tetrao tetrix 10 11 R R 1 130DE_PL Tetrao tetrix 11 12 R R 1 670IT_AT Tetrao tetrix 9 10 R R 1 1010LV_EE Tetrao tetrix 8 9 R R 1 280IT_FR Tetrao tetrix 9 11 = 11 R R 2 280SE_FIS Tetrao tetrix 7 9 R R 2 770SI_AT Tetrao tetrix 8 10 R R 2 120CZ_PL Tetrao tetrix 8 12 R R 4 250SK_PL Tetrao tetrix 8 12 R R 4 210


Data use 2

Difference Distance

UKS_IE Gallinago gallinago 9 3 R M -6 330DE_LU Gallinago gallinago 6 1 M M -5 250

15


FR_LU Gallinago gallinago 6 = 6 1 M M -5 910MT_IT Gallinago gallinago 7 = 7 4 M M -3 100NL_DK Gallinago gallinago 7 6 M M -1 520RO_HU Gallinago gallinago 7 6 M M -1 190BE_NL Gallinago gallinago 7 7 M M 0 140BG_RO Gallinago gallinago 7 7 M M 0 380CZ_PL Gallinago gallinago 7 7 M M 0 250CZ_SK Gallinago gallinago 7 7 M M 0 260DE_DK Gallinago gallinago 6 6 M M 0 820EE_FIS Gallinago gallinago 9 9 M M 0 300ESC_ESS Gallinago gallinago 5 5 M M 0 1340ESN_FR Gallinago gallinago 6 6 M M 0 550FIS_FIN Gallinago gallinago 9 9 M M 0 390FR_DE Gallinago gallinago 6 = 6 6 M M 0 860HR_HU Gallinago gallinago 6 6 M M 0 300IT_GR Gallinago gallinago 4 4 = 4 M M 0 630LV_EE Gallinago gallinago 9 9 M M 0 280PT_ESN Gallinago gallinago 6 6 M M 0 400SI_AT Gallinago gallinago 5 5 M M 0 120SK_PL Gallinago gallinago 7 7 M M 0 210UKS_UKN Gallinago gallinago 9 9 R R 0 460AT_DE Gallinago gallinago 5 6 M M 1 130AT_HU Gallinago gallinago 5 6 M M 1 220DE_CZ Gallinago gallinago 6 7 M M 1 460DE_PL Gallinago gallinago 6 7 M M 1 670DE_SE Gallinago gallinago 6 7 M M 1 940DK_SE Gallinago gallinago 6 7 M M 1 270ESC_PT Gallinago gallinago 5 6 M M 1 1200ESS_ESN Gallinago gallinago 5 6 M M 1 490FR_BE Gallinago gallinago 6 = 6 7 M M 1 880HU_SK Gallinago gallinago 6 7 M M 1 200IT_AT Gallinago gallinago 4 5 M M 1 1010IT_SI Gallinago gallinago 4 5 M M 1 880LT_LV Gallinago gallinago 8 9 M M 1 220PL_LT Gallinago gallinago 7 8 M M 1 640SI_HU Gallinago gallinago 5 6 M M 1 270AT_CZ Gallinago gallinago 5 7 M M 2 300AT_SK Gallinago gallinago 5 7 M M 2 280IT_FR Gallinago gallinago 4 6 = 6 M M 2 280IT_HR Gallinago gallinago 4 6 M M 2 720SE_FIS Gallinago gallinago 7 9 M M 2 770CY_GR Gallinago gallinago 1 4 = 4 M M 3 700FR_UKS Gallinago gallinago 6 = 6 9 M R 3 830GR_BG Gallinago gallinago 4 = 4 7 M M 3 720IE_UKN Gallinago gallinago 3 9 M R 6 360LU_BE Gallinago gallinago 1 7 M M 6 10

Border Species name Mig1_Rep1 Mig2_Rep2 Data use Data use Difference Distance

16


1 2NL_DK Scolopax rusticola 11 > 6 7 M M -4 520LU_BE Scolopax rusticola 10 7 R M -3 10MT_IT Scolopax rusticola 5 2 M M -3 100CZ_SK Scolopax rusticola 7 5 M M -2 260HR_HU Scolopax rusticola 7 = 7 5 M M -2 300RO_HU Scolopax rusticola 7 5 M M -2 190UKS_IE Scolopax rusticola 7 5 M M -2 330AT_HU Scolopax rusticola 6 5 M M -1 220AT_SK Scolopax rusticola 6 5 M M -1 280DE_SE Scolopax rusticola 7 6 M M -1 940DK_SE Scolopax rusticola 7 6 M M -1 270EE_FIS Scolopax rusticola 8 7 M M -1 300GR_BG Scolopax rusticola 7 = 7 6 M M -1 720LT_LV Scolopax rusticola 8 7 M M -1 220SI_HU Scolopax rusticola 6 5 M M -1 270DE_CZ Scolopax rusticola 7 7 M M 0 460DE_DK Scolopax rusticola 7 7 M M 0 820ESN_FR Scolopax rusticola 6 6 = 6 M M 0 550FIS_FIN Scolopax rusticola 7 7 M M 0 390HU_SK Scolopax rusticola 5 5 M M 0 200PL_LT Scolopax rusticola 8 8 M M 0 640SI_AT Scolopax rusticola 6 6 M M 0 120UKS_UKN Scolopax rusticola 7 7 M M 0 460AT_CZ Scolopax rusticola 6 7 M M 1 300AT_DE Scolopax rusticola 6 7 M M 1 130BG_RO Scolopax rusticola 6 7 M M 1 380CZ_PL Scolopax rusticola 7 8 M M 1 250DE_PL Scolopax rusticola 7 8 M M 1 670ESS_ESN Scolopax rusticola 5 6 M M 1 490FR_BE Scolopax rusticola 6 = 6 7 M M 1 880FR_DE Scolopax rusticola 6 = 6 7 M M 1 860FR_UKS Scolopax rusticola 6 = 6 7 M M 1 830LV_EE Scolopax rusticola 7 8 M M 1 280PT_ESN Scolopax rusticola 5 6 M M 1 400SE_FIS Scolopax rusticola 6 7 M M 1 770ESC_ESS Scolopax rusticola 3 5 R M 2 1340ESC_PT Scolopax rusticola 3 5 R M 2 1200IE_UKN Scolopax rusticola 5 7 M M 2 360DE_LU Scolopax rusticola 7 10 M R 3 250SK_PL Scolopax rusticola 5 8 M M 3 210BE_NL Scolopax rusticola 7 11 > 6 M M 4 140FR_LU Scolopax rusticola 6 = 6 10 M R 4 910IT_AT Scolopax rusticola 2 6 M M 4 1010IT_FR Scolopax rusticola 2 6 = 6 M M 4 280IT_SI Scolopax rusticola 2 6 M M 4 880IT_GR Scolopax rusticola 2 7 = 7 M M 5 630IT_HR Scolopax rusticola 2 7 = 7 M M 5 720

17


CY_GR Scolopax rusticola 1 7 = 7 M M 6 700Border Species name Mig1_Rep1 Mig2_Rep2 Data use

1Data use 2

Difference Distance

DE_LU Streptopelia turtur 11 1 M M -10 250FR_LU Streptopelia turtur 11 = 11 1 M M -10 910AT_SK Streptopelia turtur 11 8 M M -3 280GR_BG Streptopelia turtur 11 = 11 8 M M -3 720CZ_SK Streptopelia turtur 10 8 M M -2 260HU_SK Streptopelia turtur 10 8 M M -2 200AT_CZ Streptopelia turtur 11 10 M M -1 300AT_HU Streptopelia turtur 11 10 M M -1 220BE_NL Streptopelia turtur 11 10 >11 M M -1 140DE_CZ Streptopelia turtur 11 10 M M -1 460IT_HR Streptopelia turtur 11 10 M M -1 720RO_HU Streptopelia turtur 11 10 M M -1 190SI_HU Streptopelia turtur 11 10 M M -1 270AT_DE Streptopelia turtur 11 11 M M 0 130FIS_FIN Streptopelia turtur 13 13 M M 0 390FR_BE Streptopelia turtur 11 = 11 11 = 11 M M 0 880FR_DE Streptopelia turtur 11 = 11 11 M M 0 860FR_UKS Streptopelia turtur 11 = 11 11 M M 0 830HR_HU Streptopelia turtur 10 10 M M 0 300IT_AT Streptopelia turtur 11 11 M M 0 1010IT_FR Streptopelia turtur 11 11 = 11 M M 0 280IT_GR Streptopelia turtur 11 11 = 11 M M 0 630IT_SI Streptopelia turtur 11 11 M M 0 880LT_LV Streptopelia turtur 12 12 M M 0 220LV_EE Streptopelia turtur 12 12 M M 0 280PL_LT Streptopelia turtur 12 12 M M 0 640SI_AT Streptopelia turtur 11 11 M M 0 120DE_DK Streptopelia turtur 11 12 M M 1 820DE_PL Streptopelia turtur 11 12 M M 1 670EE_FIS Streptopelia turtur 12 13 M M 1 300ESN_FR Streptopelia turtur 10 11 M M 1 550ESS_ESN Streptopelia turtur 9 10 M M 1 490PT_ESN Streptopelia turtur 9 10 M M 1 400UKS_IE Streptopelia turtur 11 12 M M 1 330CY_GR Streptopelia turtur 9 11 = 11 M M 2 700CZ_PL Streptopelia turtur 10 12 M M 2 250ESC_ESS Streptopelia turtur 7 9 M M 2 1340ESC_PT Streptopelia turtur 7 9 M M 2 1200MT_IT Streptopelia turtur 9 11 M M 2 100NL_DK Streptopelia turtur 10 >11 12 M M 2 520BG_RO Streptopelia turtur 8 11 M M 3 380SK_PL Streptopelia turtur 8 12 M M 4 210LU_BE Streptopelia turtur 1 11 = 11 M M 10 10

18



Mig2_Rep2

Data use 1

Data use 2

Difference

Distance

19


GR_BGTurdus merula 7 = 7 4 M M -3 720

MT_IT Turdus merula 5 2 M M -3 100

HU_SKTurdus merula 6 > 4 4 M M -2 200

PT_ESN Turdus merula 7 5 R M -2 400AT_SK Turdus merula 5 4 M M -1 280CZ_SK Turdus merula 5 4 R M -1 260DE_CZ Turdus merula 6 5 M R -1 460LT_LV Turdus merula 8 7 M M -1 220AT_CZ Turdus merula 5 5 M R 0 300BE_NL Turdus merula 7 7 M M 0 140DK_SE Turdus merula 7 7 M M 0 270EE_FIS Turdus merula 7 7 M M 0 300ESC_ESS Turdus merula 5 5 M M 0 1340ESN_FR Turdus merula 5 5 M M 0 550ESS_ESN Turdus merula 5 5 M M 0 490FIS_FIN Turdus merula 7 7 M M 0 390FR_UKS Turdus merula 5 5 M M 0 830HR_HU Turdus merula 6 6 M M 0 300IE_UKN Turdus merula 5 5 M M 0 360LU_BE Turdus merula 7 7 R M 0 10LV_EE Turdus merula 7 7 M M 0 280NL_DK Turdus merula 7 7 M M 0 520SE_FIS Turdus merula 7 7 M M 0 770UKS_IE Turdus merula 5 5 M M 0 330UKS_UKN Turdus merula 5 5 M M 0 460AT_DE Turdus merula 5 6 M M 1 130AT_HU Turdus merula 5 6 M M 1 220BG_RO Turdus merula 4 5 M M 1 380DE_DK Turdus merula 6 7 M M 1 820DE_LU Turdus merula 6 7 M R 1 250DE_PL Turdus merula 6 7 M M 1 670DE_SE Turdus merula 6 7 M M 1 940FR_DE Turdus merula 5 6 M M 1 860PL_LT Turdus merula 7 8 M M 1 640RO_HU Turdus merula 5 6 M M 1 190SI_AT Turdus merula 4 5 M M 1 120CZ_PL Turdus merula 5 7 R M 2 250ESC_PT Turdus merula 5 7 M R 2 1200FR_BE Turdus merula 5 7 M M 2 880FR_LU Turdus merula 5 7 M R 2 910IT_SI Turdus merula 2 4 M M 2 880SI_HU Turdus merula 4 6 M M 2 270IT_AT Turdus merula 2 5 M M 3 1010IT_FR Turdus merula 2 5 M M 3 280SK_PL Turdus merula 4 7 M M 3 210IT_HR Turdus merula 2 6 M M 4 720

20


IT_GRTurdus merula 2 7 = 7 M M 5 630

CY_GRTurdus merula 1 7 = 7 M M 6 700


Data use 2

Difference Distance

MT_IT Turdus philomelos 9 1 M M -8 100CZ_SK Turdus philomelos 6 4 M M -2 260HU_SK Turdus philomelos 6 > 4 4 M M -2 200IE_UKN Turdus philomelos 9 7 M M -2 360AT_SK Turdus philomelos 5 4 M M -1 280GR_BG Turdus philomelos 7 = 7 6 M M -1 720NL_DK Turdus philomelos 7 6 M M -1 520PT_ESN Turdus philomelos 6 5 M M -1 400BE_NL Turdus philomelos 7 7 M M 0 140BG_RO Turdus philomelos 6 6 M M 0 380DE_CZ Turdus philomelos 6 6 M M 0 460DE_DK Turdus philomelos 6 6 M M 0 820EE_FIS Turdus philomelos 9 9 M M 0 300ESN_FR Turdus philomelos 5 5 M M 0 550FIS_FIN Turdus philomelos 9 9 M M 0 390LT_LV Turdus philomelos 8 8 M M 0 220LU_BE Turdus philomelos 7 7 M M 0 10PL_LT Turdus philomelos 8 8 M M 0 640RO_HU Turdus philomelos 6 6 M M 0 190UKS_UKN Turdus philomelos 7 7 M M 0 460AT_CZ Turdus philomelos 5 6 M M 1 300AT_DE Turdus philomelos 5 6 M M 1 130AT_HU Turdus philomelos 5 6 > 4 M M 1 220DE_LU Turdus philomelos 6 7 M M 1 250DE_SE Turdus philomelos 6 7 M M 1 940DK_SE Turdus philomelos 6 7 M M 1 270ESS_ESN Turdus philomelos 4 5 M M 1 490FR_DE Turdus philomelos 5 6 M M 1 860HR_HU Turdus philomelos 5 6 > 4 M M 1 300LV_EE Turdus philomelos 8 9 M M 1 280SI_AT Turdus philomelos 4 5 M M 1 120CZ_PL Turdus philomelos 6 8 M M 2 250DE_PL Turdus philomelos 6 8 M M 2 670FR_BE Turdus philomelos 5 7 M M 2 880FR_LU Turdus philomelos 5 7 M M 2 910FR_UKS Turdus philomelos 5 7 M M 2 830SE_FIS Turdus philomelos 7 9 M M 2 770SI_HU Turdus philomelos 4 6 > 4 M M 2 270UKS_IE Turdus philomelos 7 9 M M 2 330IT_SI Turdus philomelos 1 4 M M 3 880IT_AT Turdus philomelos 1 5 M M 4 1010IT_FR Turdus philomelos 1 5 M M 4 280

21


IT_HR Turdus philomelos 1 5 M M 4 720SK_PL Turdus philomelos 4 8 M M 4 210CY_GR Turdus philomelos 1 7 = 7 M M 6 700IT_GR Turdus philomelos 1 7 M M 6 630


Mig2_Rep2 Data use 1

Data use 2

Difference Distance

LU_BE Turdus pilaris 7 1 >6 R M -6 10MT_IT Turdus pilaris 7 2 M M -5 100FR_BE Turdus pilaris 5 1 > 6 M M -4 880IE_UKN Turdus pilaris 6 3 M M -3 360BG_RO Turdus pilaris 8 6 M M -2 380DE_CZ Turdus pilaris 6 4 M M -2 460FR_UKS Turdus pilaris 5 3 M M -2 830HU_SK Turdus pilaris 6 > 4 4 M M -2 200AT_CZ Turdus pilaris 4 4 M M 0 300AT_SK Turdus pilaris 4 4 M M 0 280CZ_SK Turdus pilaris 4 4 M M 0 260DK_SE Turdus pilaris 7 7 M M 0 270EE_FIS Turdus pilaris 8 8 M M 0 300ESS_ESN Turdus pilaris 4 4 M M 0 490FIS_FIN Turdus pilaris 8 8 M M 0 390LT_LV Turdus pilaris 8 8 M M 0 220LV_EE Turdus pilaris 8 8 M M 0 280NL_DK Turdus pilaris 7 7 M M 0 520RO_HU Turdus pilaris 6 6 M M 0 190UKS_UKN Turdus pilaris 3 3 M M 0 460DE_DK Turdus pilaris 6 7 M M 1 820DE_LU Turdus pilaris 6 7 M R 1 250DE_PL Turdus pilaris 6 7 M M 1 670DE_SE Turdus pilaris 6 7 M M 1 940ESN_FR Turdus pilaris 4 5 M M 1 550FR_DE Turdus pilaris 5 6 M M 1 860HR_HU Turdus pilaris 5 6 > 4 M M 1 300IT_SI Turdus pilaris 2 3 M M 1 880PL_LT Turdus pilaris 7 8 M M 1 640SE_FIS Turdus pilaris 7 8 M M 1 770SI_AT Turdus pilaris 3 4 M M 1 120AT_DE Turdus pilaris 4 6 M M 2 130AT_HU Turdus pilaris 4 6 > 4 M M 2 220FR_LU Turdus pilaris 5 7 M R 2 910GR_BG Turdus pilaris 6 8 M M 2 720IT_AT Turdus pilaris 2 4 M M 2 1010CZ_PL Turdus pilaris 4 7 M M 3 250IT_FR Turdus pilaris 2 5 M M 3 280IT_HR Turdus pilaris 2 5 M M 3 720SI_HU Turdus pilaris 3 6 > 4 M M 3 270

22


SK_PL Turdus pilaris 4 7 M M 3 210UKS_IE Turdus pilaris 3 6 M M 3 330IT_GR Turdus pilaris 2 6 M M 4 630CY_GR Turdus pilaris 1 6 M M 5 700BE_NL Turdus pilaris 1 > 6 7 M M 6 140

End of reproduction

Border Species nameEnd_Rep1

End_Rep2

Difference

Distance

AT_IT Anser anser 18 23 -5 340PL_DE Anser anser 18 23 -5 640HR_IT Anser anser 19 > 22 23 -4 410HR_SI Anser anser 19 > 22 23 -4 240BE_LU Anser anser 21 24 -3 140PL_CZ Anser anser 18 21 -3 580FIN_SE Anser anser 21 > 22 23 -2 290FIS_EE Anser anser 21 > 22 23 -2 480FR_LU Anser anser 22 = 22 24 -2 280HU_SI Anser anser 21 23 -2 430RO_HU Anser anser 19 21 -2 400BE_FR Anser anser 21 22 =22 -1 210DE_LU Anser anser 23 24 -1 710LV_LT Anser anser 20 > 21 21 -1 190DK_NL Anser anser 21 21 0 530FIN_FIS Anser anser 21 > 22 21 > 22 0 700NL_BE Anser anser 21 21 0 260SE_DE Anser anser 23 23 0 1600SI_IT Anser anser 23 23 0 220DE_FR Anser anser 23 22 = 22 1 840IT_FR Anser anser 23 22 = 22 1 770RO_BG Anser anser 19 18 1 480UKS_FR

Anser anser 23 22 = 22 1 570

DE_CZ Anser anser 23 21 2 420DE_NL Anser anser 23 21 2 460HU_HR Anser anser 21 19 > 22 2 360SE_DK Anser anser 23 21 2 1330CZ_AT Anser anser 21 18 3 190EE_LV Anser anser 23 20 > 21 3 220HU_AT Anser anser 21 18 3 360LT_PL Anser anser 21 18 3 260UKS_IE Anser anser 23 20 3 570DE_AT Anser anser 23 18 5 670SI_AT Anser anser 23 18 5 220

Border Species name End_Rep1 End_Rep2 Difference DistancePL_CZ Anas crecca 18 25 -7 580

23


PL_DE Anas crecca 18 24 -6 640PL_SK Anas crecca 18 22 -4 540SK_CZ Anas crecca 22 25 -3 300AT_IT Anas crecca 23 25 -2 340SI_IT Anas crecca 23 25 -2 220SK_HU Anas crecca 22 24 -2 100BE_FR Anas crecca 23 24 = 24 -1 210DE_CZ Anas crecca 24 25 -1 420NL_BE Anas crecca 22 23 -1 260SK_AT Anas crecca 22 23 -1 380UKS_FR Anas crecca 23 24 = 24 -1 570DE_FR Anas crecca 24 24 = 24 0 840EE_LV Anas crecca 23 23 0 220FIN_FIS Anas crecca 24 24 0 700FIN_SE Anas crecca 24 24 0 290FR_ESN Anas crecca 24 24 0 960RO_HU Anas crecca 24 24 0 400SE_DE Anas crecca 24 24 0 1600SE_DK Anas crecca 24 24 0 1330SI_AT Anas crecca 23 23 0 220UKN_IE Anas crecca 23 23 0 540UKN_UKS Anas crecca 23 23 0 350UKS_IE Anas crecca 23 23 0 570DE_AT Anas crecca 24 23 1 670ESN_ESS Anas crecca 24 23 1 290FIS_EE Anas crecca 24 23 1 480HU_AT Anas crecca 24 23 1 360HU_SI Anas crecca 24 23 1 430IT_FR Anas crecca 25 24 = 24 1 770LT_PL Anas crecca 19 18 1 260CZ_AT Anas crecca 25 23 2 190DE_NL Anas crecca 24 22 2 460DK_NL Anas crecca 24 22 2 530LV_LT Anas crecca 23 19 4 190RO_BG Anas crecca 24 18 6 480

Border Species name End_Rep1 End_Rep2 Difference DistancePL_CZ Aythya fuligula 20 > 24 26 -6 580PL_DE Aythya fuligula 20 > 24 25 -5 640EE_LV Aythya fuligula 21 24 > 23 -3 220PL_SK Aythya fuligula 20 > 24 23 -3 540SK_AT Aythya fuligula 23 26 -3 380SK_CZ Aythya fuligula 23 26 -3 300DE_LU Aythya fuligula 25 27 -2 710IT_FR Aythya fuligula 24 26 -2 770NL_BE Aythya fuligula 24 26 -2 260SE_DK Aythya fuligula 24 26 -2 1330

24


SK_HU Aythya fuligula 23 25 -2 100BE_LU Aythya fuligula 26 27 -1 140DE_AT Aythya fuligula 25 26 -1 670DE_CZ Aythya fuligula 25 26 -1 420DE_FR Aythya fuligula 25 26 -1 840FR_LU Aythya fuligula 26 27 -1 280HR_SI Aythya fuligula 24 25 -1 240HU_AT Aythya fuligula 25 26 -1 360LV_LT Aythya fuligula 24 >23 25 -1 190SE_DE Aythya fuligula 24 25 -1 1600SI_AT Aythya fuligula 25 26 -1 220BE_FR Aythya fuligula 26 26 0 210CZ_AT Aythya fuligula 26 26 0 190FIN_FIS Aythya fuligula 25 25 0 700HR_IT Aythya fuligula 24 24 0 410HU_SI Aythya fuligula 25 25 0 430DE_NL Aythya fuligula 25 24 1 460FIN_SE Aythya fuligula 25 24 1 290HU_HR Aythya fuligula 25 24 1 360RO_HU Aythya fuligula 26 25 1 400SI_IT Aythya fuligula 25 24 1 220UKS_FR Aythya fuligula 27 26 1 570AT_IT Aythya fuligula 26 24 2 340DK_NL Aythya fuligula 26 24 2 530UKS_IE Aythya fuligula 27 25 2 570FR_ESN Aythya fuligula 26 23 3 960FIS_EE Aythya fuligula 25 21 4 480LT_PL Aythya fuligula 25 20 > 24 5 260


End_Rep2

Difference

Distance

SK_AT Tetrao tetrix 21 26 -5 380SK_CZ Tetrao tetrix 21 25 -4 300SE_DE Tetrao tetrix 22 25 -3 1600BE_FR Tetrao tetrix 24 26 = 26 -2 210LT_PL Tetrao tetrix 24 26 -2 260LV_LT Tetrao tetrix 22 24 -2 190AT_IT Tetrao tetrix 26 27 -1 340CZ_AT Tetrao tetrix 25 26 -1 190DE_AT Tetrao tetrix 25 26 -1 670DE_FR Tetrao tetrix 25 26 = 26 -1 840EE_LV Tetrao tetrix 21 22 -1 220DE_CZ Tetrao tetrix 25 25 0 420FIN_FIS Tetrao tetrix 24 > 23 24 > 23 0 700SI_IT Tetrao tetrix 27 27 0 220IT_FR Tetrao tetrix 27 26 = 26 1 770

25


PL_CZ Tetrao tetrix 26 25 1 580PL_DE Tetrao tetrix 26 25 1 640SI_AT Tetrao tetrix 27 26 1 220FIN_SE Tetrao tetrix 24 > 23 22 2 290FIS_EE Tetrao tetrix 24 > 23 21 3 480PL_SK Tetrao tetrix 26 21 5 540

Border Species name End_Rep1 End_Rep2 Difference DistanceUKS_IE Gallinago gallinago 20 25 -5 570EE_LV Gallinago gallinago 18 22 -4 220PL_CZ Gallinago gallinago 18 22 -4 580PL_DE Gallinago gallinago 18 22 -4 640PL_SK Gallinago gallinago 18 22 -4 540BE_FR Gallinago gallinago 19 20 -1 210FIN_SE Gallinago gallinago 21 22 -1 290FR_ESN Gallinago gallinago 20 =20 21 -1 960HR_SI Gallinago gallinago 21 22 -1 240HU_AT Gallinago gallinago 21 22 -1 360HU_SI Gallinago gallinago 21 22 -1 430UKN_IE Gallinago gallinago 24 25 -1 540CZ_AT Gallinago gallinago 22 22 0 190DE_AT Gallinago gallinago 22 22 0 670DE_CZ Gallinago gallinago 22 22 0 420DK_NL Gallinago gallinago 21 21 0 530FIN_FIS Gallinago gallinago 21 21 0 700HU_HR Gallinago gallinago 21 21 0 360LV_LT Gallinago gallinago 22 22 0 190RO_HU Gallinago gallinago 21 21 0 400SE_DE Gallinago gallinago 22 22 0 1600SI_AT Gallinago gallinago 22 22 0 220SK_AT Gallinago gallinago 22 22 0 380SK_CZ Gallinago gallinago 22 22 0 300UKS_FR Gallinago gallinago 20 20 = 20 0 570DE_NL Gallinago gallinago 22 21 1 460ESN_PT Gallinago gallinago 21 20 1 780SE_DK Gallinago gallinago 22 21 1 1330SK_HU Gallinago gallinago 22 21 1 100DE_FR Gallinago gallinago 22 20 =20 2 840NL_BE Gallinago gallinago 21 19 2 260FIS_EE Gallinago gallinago 21 18 3 480LT_PL Gallinago gallinago 22 18 4 260UKN_UKS Gallinago gallinago 24 20 4 350


End_Rep2

Difference

Distance

PL_CZ Scolopax rusticola 20 25 -5 580UKN_IE Scolopax rusticola 20 25 -5 540

26


UKS_IE Scolopax rusticola 21 25 -4 570PL_DE Scolopax rusticola 20 23 -3 640PL_SK Scolopax rusticola 20 23 -3 540UKS_FR Scolopax rusticola 21 24 = 24 -3 570DE_AT Scolopax rusticola 23 25 -2 670DE_CZ Scolopax rusticola 23 25 -2 420EE_LV Scolopax rusticola 21 23 -2 220HU_AT Scolopax rusticola 23 25 -2 360RO_HU Scolopax rusticola 21 23 -2 400SE_DK Scolopax rusticola 23 25 -2 1330SK_AT Scolopax rusticola 23 25 -2 380SK_CZ Scolopax rusticola 23 25 -2 300DE_FR Scolopax rusticola 23 24 = 24 -1 840DE_LU Scolopax rusticola 23 24 -1 710HR_SI Scolopax rusticola 23 24 -1 240HU_SI Scolopax rusticola 23 24 -1 430IT_FR Scolopax rusticola 23 24 = 24 -1 770NL_BE Scolopax rusticola 23 24 -1 260SI_AT Scolopax rusticola 24 25 -1 220UKN_UKS Scolopax rusticola 20 21 -1 350BE_FR Scolopax rusticola 24 24 = 24 0 210BE_LU Scolopax rusticola 24 24 0 140CZ_AT Scolopax rusticola 25 25 0 190DE_NL Scolopax rusticola 23 23 0 460FIN_FIS Scolopax rusticola 24 24 0 700FR_ESN Scolopax rusticola 24 = 24 24 0 960FR_LU Scolopax rusticola 24 = 24 24 0 280HR_IT Scolopax rusticola 23 23 0 410HU_HR Scolopax rusticola 23 23 0 360RO_BG Scolopax rusticola 21 21 0 480SE_DE Scolopax rusticola 23 23 0 1600SK_HU Scolopax rusticola 23 23 0 100FIN_SE Scolopax rusticola 24 23 1 290LT_PL Scolopax rusticola 21 20 1 260SI_IT Scolopax rusticola 24 23 1 220AT_IT Scolopax rusticola 25 23 2 340DK_NL Scolopax rusticola 25 23 2 530LV_LT Scolopax rusticola 23 21 2 190FIS_EE Scolopax rusticola 24 21 3 480


End_Rep2

Difference

Distance

RO_HU Streptopelia turtur 21 27 -6 400DE_LU Streptopelia turtur 22 27 -5 710DE_NL Streptopelia turtur 22 27 -5 460BE_LU Streptopelia turtur 23 27 -4 140DK_NL Streptopelia turtur 23 27 -4 530

27


HR_SI Streptopelia turtur 23 27 -4 240DE_CZ Streptopelia turtur 22 25 -3 420FR_LU Streptopelia turtur 24 27 -3 280GR_IT Streptopelia turtur 21 24 -3 700PL_CZ Streptopelia turtur 22 25 -3 580RO_BG Streptopelia turtur 21 24 -3 480SK_HU Streptopelia turtur 24 27 -3 100DE_AT Streptopelia turtur 22 24 -2 670DE_FR Streptopelia turtur 22 24 -2 840PL_SK Streptopelia turtur 22 24 -2 540BE_FR Streptopelia turtur 23 24 -1 210EE_LV Streptopelia turtur 21 22 -1 220HR_IT Streptopelia turtur 23 = 23 24 -1 410LV_LT Streptopelia turtur 22 23 -1 190SK_CZ Streptopelia turtur 24 25 -1 300AT_IT Streptopelia turtur 24 24 0 340ESN_ESS Streptopelia turtur 23 23 0 290ESN_PT Streptopelia turtur 23 23 0 780FIN_FIS Streptopelia turtur 23 23 0 700HU_SI Streptopelia turtur 27 27 0 430IT_FR Streptopelia turtur 24 24 0 770PL_DE Streptopelia turtur 22 22 0 640SK_AT Streptopelia turtur 24 24 0 380CZ_AT Streptopelia turtur 25 24 1 190FR_ESN Streptopelia turtur 24 23 1 960LT_PL Streptopelia turtur 23 22 1 260CY_GR Streptopelia turtur 23 21 2 790ESS_ESC Streptopelia turtur 23 21 2 1990FIS_EE Streptopelia turtur 23 21 2 480IT_MT Streptopelia turtur 24 22 2 1180PT_ESC Streptopelia turtur 23 21 2 1690UKS_FR Streptopelia turtur 26 24 2 570BG_GR Streptopelia turtur 24 21 3 290HU_AT Streptopelia turtur 27 24 3 360SI_AT Streptopelia turtur 27 24 3 220SI_IT Streptopelia turtur 27 24 3 220HU_HR Streptopelia turtur 27 23 = 23 4 360NL_BE Streptopelia turtur 27 23 4 260


End_Rep2

Difference

Distance

NL_BE Turdus merula 21 24 -3 260PT_ESC Turdus merula 20 23 -3 1690BG_GR Turdus merula 21 23 -2 290CY_GR Turdus merula 21 23 -2 790LV_LT Turdus merula 21 23 -2 190

28


PL_CZ Turdus merula 21 23 -2 580PL_DE Turdus merula 21 23 -2 640SK_AT Turdus merula 22 24 -2 380SK_HU Turdus merula 22 24 -2 100UKS_FR Turdus merula 21 23 -2 570CZ_AT Turdus merula 23 24 -1 190DE_AT Turdus merula 23 24 -1 670DE_LU Turdus merula 23 24 -1 710FR_LU Turdus merula 23 24 -1 280GR_IT Turdus merula 23 24 -1 700PL_SK Turdus merula 21 22 -1 540SE_DK Turdus merula 23 24 -1 1330SK_CZ Turdus merula 22 23 -1 300UKN_IE Turdus merula 20 21 -1 540UKN_UKS Turdus merula 20 21 -1 350AT_IT Turdus merula 24 24 0 340BE_LU Turdus merula 24 24 0 140DE_CZ Turdus merula 23 23 0 420DE_FR Turdus merula 23 23 0 840EE_LV Turdus merula 21 21 0 220ESN_ESS Turdus merula 23 23 0 290ESS_ESC Turdus merula 23 23 0 1990FIN_FIS Turdus merula 26 26 0 700FR_ESN Turdus merula 23 23 0 960HR_IT Turdus merula 24 24 0 410HR_SI Turdus merula 24 24 0 240HU_AT Turdus merula 24 24 0 360HU_HR Turdus merula 24 24 0 360HU_SI Turdus merula 24 24 0 430RO_HU Turdus merula 24 24 0 400SE_DE Turdus merula 23 23 0 1600SI_AT Turdus merula 24 24 0 220SI_IT Turdus merula 24 24 0 220UKS_IE Turdus merula 21 21 0 570BE_FR Turdus merula 24 23 1 210IT_FR Turdus merula 24 23 1 770DE_NL Turdus merula 23 21 2 460LT_PL Turdus merula 23 21 2 260DK_NL Turdus merula 24 21 3 530ESN_PT Turdus merula 23 20 3 780FIN_SE Turdus merula 26 23 3 290RO_BG Turdus merula 24 21 3 480FIS_EE Turdus merula 26 21 5 480


End_Rep2

Difference

Distance

NL_BE Turdus philomelos 21 24 -3 260RO_HU Turdus philomelos 21 24 -3 400SK_HU Turdus philomelos 21 24 -3 100

29


GR_IT Turdus philomelos 21 23 -2 700PL_CZ Turdus philomelos 21 23 -2 580SK_CZ Turdus philomelos 21 23 -2 300UKS_FR Turdus philomelos 21 23 -2 570AT_IT Turdus philomelos 22 23 -1 340DE_CZ Turdus philomelos 22 23 -1 420DE_FR Turdus philomelos 22 23 -1 840EE_LV Turdus philomelos 21 22 -1 220HR_IT Turdus philomelos 22 23 -1 410HR_SI Turdus philomelos 22 23 -1 240LV_LT Turdus philomelos 22 23 -1 190PL_DE Turdus philomelos 21 22 -1 640SK_AT Turdus philomelos 21 22 -1 380UKN_UKS Turdus philomelos 20 21 -1 350BG_GR Turdus philomelos 21 21 0 290DE_AT Turdus philomelos 22 22 0 670FIN_FIS Turdus philomelos 23 23 0 700FIN_SE Turdus philomelos 23 23 0 290IT_FR Turdus philomelos 23 23 0 770PL_SK Turdus philomelos 21 21 0 540RO_BG Turdus philomelos 21 21 0 480SI_IT Turdus philomelos 23 23 0 220BE_FR Turdus philomelos 24 23 1 210CZ_AT Turdus philomelos 23 22 1 190DE_LU Turdus philomelos 22 21 1 710DE_NL Turdus philomelos 22 21 1 460DK_NL Turdus philomelos 22 21 1 530ESN_ESS Turdus philomelos 22 21 1 290ESN_PT Turdus philomelos 22 21 1 780FR_ESN Turdus philomelos 23 22 1 960HU_SI Turdus philomelos 24 23 1 430SE_DE Turdus philomelos 23 22 1 1600SE_DK Turdus philomelos 23 22 1 1330SI_AT Turdus philomelos 23 22 1 220FIS_EE Turdus philomelos 23 21 2 480FR_LU Turdus philomelos 23 21 2 280HU_AT Turdus philomelos 24 22 2 360HU_HR Turdus philomelos 24 22 2 360LT_PL Turdus philomelos 23 21 2 260PT_ESC Turdus philomelos 21 19 2 1690UKN_IE Turdus philomelos 20 18 2 540BE_LU Turdus philomelos 24 21 3 140UKS_IE Turdus philomelos 21 18 3 570


End_Rep2

Difference

Distance

SK_AT Turdus pilaris 19 23 -4 380

30


SK_HU Turdus pilaris 19 23 -4 100CZ_AT Turdus pilaris 20 23 -3 190DE_LU Turdus pilaris 21 24 -3 710PL_DE Turdus pilaris 18 21 -3 640DE_AT Turdus pilaris 21 23 -2 670DE_FR Turdus pilaris 21 23 -2 840IT_FR Turdus pilaris 21 23 -2 770PL_CZ Turdus pilaris 18 20 -2 580RO_HU Turdus pilaris 21 23 -2 400SI_AT Turdus pilaris 21 23 -2 220BE_LU Turdus pilaris 23 24 -1 140FR_LU Turdus pilaris 23 24 -1 280LV_LT Turdus pilaris 20 21 -1 190PL_SK Turdus pilaris 18 19 -1 540SK_CZ Turdus pilaris 19 20 -1 300BE_FR Turdus pilaris 23 23 0 210FIN_FIS Turdus pilaris 22 22 0 700FIN_SE Turdus pilaris 22 22 0 290HR_IT Turdus pilaris 21 21 0 410HR_SI Turdus pilaris 21 21 0 240HU_AT Turdus pilaris 23 23 0 360SI_IT Turdus pilaris 21 21 0 220DE_CZ Turdus pilaris 21 20 1 420EE_LV Turdus pilaris 21 20 1 220FIS_EE Turdus pilaris 22 21 1 480SE_DE Turdus pilaris 22 21 1 1600SE_DK Turdus pilaris 22 21 1 1330AT_IT Turdus pilaris 23 21 2 340HU_HR Turdus pilaris 23 21 2 360HU_SI Turdus pilaris 23 21 2 430LT_PL Turdus pilaris 21 18 3 260

---

31

Documents

circabc.europa.eu · Web view1st ad-hoc meeting on the update of the document on “The key concepts on Article 7(4) of the Birds Directive” (periods of pre-nuptial migration