Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lesson 1: To demonstrate an understanding of the text ‘Explorers or boys messing about’. To identify the perspective Morris has of the men using evidence from the text to support your point of view.
Do it nowIf someone has an adventure, they become involved in an unusual, exciting, and rather dangerous journey or series of events.
What ‘adventures’ would you like to have before you hit your elder years?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
‘It is not an adventure, if it does not contain an element of danger.’
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
‘The pursuit of an adventure, if there is an element of danger involved, is a selfish act.’
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
New knowledgeThe title of the text we are going to read is ‘Explorers of boys messing about? Either way, taxpayer gets rescue bill.’ What do you think the writer of this article thinks about adventurers?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
This is a shortened newspaper article that tells the story of two men rescued by the Chilean Navy when their helicopter crashed in the sea off Antarctica. (The full article can be found in The Guardian here: http ://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/jan/28/stevenmorris ).
The writer, Steven Morris, is a reporter for the broadsheet newspaper The Guardian and in this extract, from an article published in 2003, he gives an account of two hapless “explorers”.
Let’s read the newspaper article.
2
Title Explorers or boys messing about? Either way, taxpayer gets rescue bill, Steven Morris Summary
Adapted from an article published in The Guardian newspaper, 28 January 2003. Helicopter duo plucked from liferaft after Antarctic crash.
1 Their last expedition ended in farce when the Russians threatened to send in military2 military planes to intercept them as they tried to cross into Siberia via the icebound Bering3 strait.
4 Yesterday a new adventure undertaken by British explorers Steve Brooks and Quentin 5 Smith almost led to tragedy when their helicopter plunged into the sea off Antarctica.
6 The men were plucked from the icy water by a Chilean naval ship after a nine-hour 7 rescue which began when Mr Brooks contacted his wife, Jo Vestey, on his satellite phone8 asking for assistance. The rescue involved the Royal Navy, the RAF and British9 coastguards.
10
Last night there was resentment in some quarters that the men’s adventure had cost the
11
taxpayers of Britain and Chile tens of thousands of pounds.
12
Experts questioned the wisdom of taking a small helicopter – the four-seater Robinson
13
R44 had a single engine – into such a hostile environment.
14
There was also confusion about what exactly the men were trying to achieve. A website
15
set up to promote the Bering Strait expedition claims the team were planning to fly from
16
the north to south pole in their “trusty helicopter.”
3
17
But Ms Vestey claimed she did not know what the pair were up to, describing them as
18
‘boys messing about with a helicopter.’
19
The drama began at around 1am British time when Mr Brooks, 42, and 40-year-old Mr
20
Smith, also known as Q, ditched into the sea 100 miles off Antarctica, about 36 miles
21
north of Smith Island, and scrambled into their liferaft.
22
Mr Brooks called his wife in London on his satellite phone. She said: ‘He said they were
23
Both in the liferaft but were okay and could I call the emergency people?’
24
Meanwhile, distress signals were being beamed from the ditched helicopter and from Mr
25
Brooks’ Breitling emergency watch, a wedding present.
26
The signals from the aircraft were deciphered by Falmouth coastguard and passed on to
27
The rescue coordination-centre at RAF Kinloss in Scotland.
28
The Royal Navy’s ice patrol ship, HMS Endurance, which was 180 miles away surveying
29
Unchartered waters, began steaming towards the scene and dispatched its two Lynx
30
Helicopters.
4
31
One was driven back because of poor visibility but the second was on its way when the
32
Men were picked up by a Chilean naval vessel at about 10.20am British time.
33
Though the pair wore survival suits and the weather at the spot where they ditched was
34
Clear, one Antarctic explorer told Mr Brooks’ wife it was ‘nothing short of a miracle’ that
35
They had survived.
36
Both men were experienced adventurers. Mr Brooks, a property developer from London,
37
Has taken part in expeditions to 70 countries in 15 years. He has trekked solo to Everest
38
Base camp and walked barefoot for three days in the Himalayas. He has negotiated the
39
White water rapids of the Zambezi river by kayak and survived a charge by a silver back
40
Gorilla in the Congo. He is also a qualified mechanical engineer and pilot.
41
He and his wife spent their honeymoon flying the helicopter from Alaska to Chile. The
42
16,000-mile trip took three months.
43
Mr Smith, also from London, claims to have been flying since the age of five. He has
44
Twice flown a helicopter around the globe and won the world freestyle helicopter flying
45
Championship.
5
46
Despite their experience, it is not the first time they have hit the headlines for the wrong
47
Reasons.
48
In April, Mr Brooks and another explorer, Graham Stratford, were poised to become the
49
First to complete a crossing of the 56-mile wide frozen Bering Strait between the US and
50
Russia in an amphibious vehicle, Snowbird VI, which could carve it way through ice
51
Floes and float in the water in between.
52
But they were forced to call a halt after the Russian authorities told them they would
53
Scramble military helicopters to lift them off the ice if they crossed the border.
54
Ironically, one of the aims of the expedition, for which Mr Smith provided air back-up,
55
Was to demonstrate how good relations between east and west had become.
56
The wisdom of the team’s latest adventure was questioned by, among others, Gunter
57
Endres, editor of Jane’s Helicopter Markets and Systems, said: ‘I’m surprised they used
58
The R44. I wouldn’t use a helicopter like that to go so far over the sea. It sounds as if
59
They were pushing it to the maximum.’
6
60
A spokesman for the pair said it was not known what had gone wrong. The flying
61
Conditions had been ‘excellent’.
62
The Ministry of Degence said the taxpayer would pick up the bill, as was normal in
63
Rescues in the UK and abroad. The spokesperson said it was ‘highly unlikely’ it would
64
Recover any of the money.
65
Last night the men were on their way to the Chilean naval base Eduardo Frei, where
66
HMS Endurance was to pick them up. Ms Vestey said: ‘They have been checked and
67
Appear to be well. I don’t know what will happen to them once they have been picked up
68
HMS Endurance – they’ll probably have their bottoms kicked and be sent home the long
69
Way.’
7
Pen to paperWhat is Steven Morris’ perspective on the two men?
Perspective Evidence (highlight the key techniques that help to present this perspective)
The
writ
er, S
teve
n M
orris
, is
criti
cal o
f the
act
ions
of t
he m
en.
The men’s sense of adventure is costly.
The men were ill-prepared.
The men were seemingly experienced.
The men have never been in trouble before.
The men / Ms Vestry don’t seem to realise the seriousness of the situation.
New knowledgeLook at the following paragraph about Steven Morris’ perspective on the two men.
Steven Morris thinks the men’s sense of adventure is costly. This is evident when he writes that
the men’s activity has ‘cost the taxpayers of Britain and Chile tens of thousands of pounds.’ The
use of the verb ‘cost’ implies that other people are paying for the adventure of the two men and
when combined with the noun ‘taxpayers’ we realise that this is inclusive of all people and,
therefore, their little expedition has affected a large number of people. In using the proper nouns
‘Britain’ and Chile’, Morris conveys the idea that this also affects all the taxpayers in two countries,
again emphasizing that multiple countries are involved and affected and we learn that the cost has
been great through the hyperbolic use of ‘tens of thousands of pounds’. Further more Morris
8
reinforces the impact on others when he writes ‘taxpayers will pick up the bill’. The use of the
modal verb ‘will’ puts forward a certainty and contains a tone of disappointment that innocent
people will have to fund the men’s irresponsibility.
WHAT? HOW? WHY?
Pen to paperNow construct your own WHAT HOW WHY paragraph analyzing an alternative perspective Morris holds on the two men.
WHAT? What is this perspective?HOW? 1. How do you know? What evidence do you have?
2. What methods has Morris used to help him convey this? WHY? Why has Morris employed these methods? What is revealed about his perspective?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
9
Lesson 2: To analyse how Steven Morris uses language to create a particular tone and convey his perspective.
Do it nowLet’s recap our understanding of Morris’ perspective on the boys’ adventure.Which of the following adjectives do you think best describes Morris’ tone when writing about the men’s behaviour?
Irresponsible favourable censorious critical
Sympathetic ironic reckless admiring
Judgmental approving derogatory imprudent
Satirical immature indignant unsympathetic
Disapproving thoughtful childish over-confident
Now pin your highlighted choices to specific examples within the text. If you have argued that Morris’ tone indicates that he finds the men irresponsible, what evidence do you have to back this up?
New knowledgeWhen exploring the tone of the next, it is important to consider how the tone shifts across the writing of the piece. To do this, we need to simple consider what the tone was like at the start of the text, what the tone was like in the middle of the text and what the tone was like towards the end of the text.
Pen to paperLet’s consider the tone at the start in the middle and towards the end. On the chart in the next page, choose one word to summarise the tone at the start of the article, in the middle and towards the end. Identify quotations that you think encapsulate the tone and from within those quotations, consider the techniques that you think have been used particularly effectively.
Quotations to support How do the techniques used 10
to convey tone also help support the writer’s
perspective?At the start of the article, Morris adopts a ….
In the middle of the article, Morris uses a ….
Towards the end of the article, Morris tone is ….
Pen to paperLook at the following paragraph on the tone at the start of the article:
At the start of the article, the tone Morris adopts is disapproving. This is evident when he states
‘Last night there was resentment in some quarters that the men’s adventure had cost the
taxpayers of Britain and Chile tens of thousands of pounds.’ The use of the noun ‘resentment’
indicates the writer is reflecting the umbrage many people felt towards the men’s expedition as a
result of it costing them money. The use of the past perfect ‘had cost’ suggests upset that
innocent people had to pay from their pockets to finance the men’s trip with the writer suggesting
that had the men not acted in such a reckless way other people would not have had to lose out.
This also causes the reader to ponder over whether men like these should be able to partake in
such activities so freely.
WHAT? HOW? WHY?
11
Pen to paperNow construct your own WHAT HOW WHY paragraph analyzing an alternative perspective Morris holds on the two men.
WHAT? What is this the tone?HOW? 3. How do you know? What evidence do you have?
4. What methods has Morris used to help him convey this? WHY? Why has Morris employed these methods? How successfully has a tone been
conveyed?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
12
Lesson 3: To analyse how Steven Morris uses structural devices to help convey his criticism of the explorers
Do it nowRecap questions:
1. What is Morris’ perspective on the men’s expedition?______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
2. How does the tone shift across the article?______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
3. What is the difference between perspective and tone?______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Recapping prior knowledgeIn today’s lesson we are going to explore how Morris use structural techniques in his article. Let’s start by refreshing our knowledge of key structural techniques. Mix and match the term with its correct definition.
1. Heading a. Saying the same thing more than once for emphasis.
2. Paragraphs b. A punctuation mark used to separate groups of words for emphasis.
3. Quotes from reliable sources
c. A title at the top of a page or at the start of a section of writing.
4. Short sentence d. A sentence made up of a small number of words used to create impact.
5. Multi-clause sentence
e. Using the views of experts or professionals.
6. Dashes f. A section of a piece of writing, usually dealing with a single theme and indicated by a new line or indentation.
7. Inverted commas g. A punctuation mark that is used to show where speech or a quotation begins and ends.
8. Repetition h. A sentence made up of a number of clauses.
9. Contrast i. A différence in perspective, tone etc etc
13
Pen to paperHow does Steven Morris use structural features to help his criticism of the men?
Structural features
Example and how does it support his perspective?
Text type features – newspaper article
Sentence structures
Punctuation
Repetition
Contrast
ReflectionLooking at all of the structural techniques used by Morris, which structural technique do you think most supports him to convey his perspective?______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
14