webdocs.edmonton.cawebdocs.edmonton.ca/.../CC/Elected-1989/1991-10-08/C… · Web viewCOUNCIL MEETING NO. 51. TUESDAY OCTOBER 8, 1991. WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 9, 1991. PRESENT: Mayor

COUNCIL MEETING NO. 51

TUESDAY OCTOBER 8, 1991.WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 9, 1991.

PRESENT: Mayor Jan Reimer.Aldermen J. Bethel, M. Binder,B. Campbell, C. Chichak, R. Hayter,P. Mackenzie, B. Mason, S. McKay, H. Paull,L. Staroszik, L. White.

ABSENT: Alderman K.B. Kozak.

ALSO IN ATTENDANCE:

R. Picherack, City ManagerJ. Basey, City Solicitor.R. Liteplo, Assistant City Solicitor. U.S. Watkiss, City ClerkP. Beelby, Assistant City Clerk.

Mayor Reimer called the meeting to order at 9:32 a.m.

Reverend Martin Garber-Konrad, Lutheran Church, Ste. 1808, 10065 Jasper Avenue, T5J 3B1, opened the meeting with prayers.

On a Point of Privilege, Mayor Reimer stated the following:

Today is the closest day that we have to celebrate a 20th Anniversary, and that is twenty years of service by Alderman Ron Hayter to the citizens of Edmonton.

I have a couple of presentations actually to make andcertainly, I have served ten of those twenty years, ifnot more, with Alderman Hayter and I can say he has been a strong advocate of the sporting community, of Community Leagues, and certainly always stressed to Members of Council the importance of having strong ties with the North. You have also dedicated yourself to ties withother municipalities through the A.U.M.A. and F.C.M., and certainly on behalf of my colleagues on Council, we would

Council MinutesOctober 8, 1991 2478

like to rise to this occasion and congratulate you on thetwenty years. I have also asked the media to help alittle bit, if that is possible, in looking at some of your history and I had hoped they had been able to assemble a large amount of news articles that we could present with you the highlights of your career. But what they got for me was rather the headline on the day that you were elected, and true to form here's what it readsA Bizarre Civic Election, Strange Result of Ward System Experiment" and there's Alderman Hayter's picture in themiddle. So Ron, if you would like to come forward, I would like to first of all present you with a 20 year Pin and also the memory of your election day. Thank you very much, Ron.

Members of Council, the Administration, and the public acknowledged Alderman Hayter's service to the City of Edmonton.

Alderman Hayter responded with the following:

Well Madam Mayor, after looking at this I must say Ireally like the picture, but I think I am going to write a letter to the Edmonton Journal - I see a misquote in the first paragraph.

Well, twenty years go by pretty quickly, Madam Mayor, andI really do not see this as that significant because Ithink people have served this City in the past, who have served certainly longer than I have. I think the true measure is whether you feel you have accomplished something during those years. I look back and I believe that I have been able to contribute something to the betterment of this City and one of the most important things, I think that I can look back on, is the good relationship that I have had over the years with thepeople that I have represented. Without that kind of trust at the Ward level, with the people who yourepresent, you do not stay on Council for twenty years.

I thank all Members of Council for their consideration, but I warn you, the fact that you make this presentation to me is not going to make me any less skeptical whenprojects are brought forward that I do not agree with andcertainly I am going to take issue with things that I donot think are in the best interests of the City. As faras the media is concerned, I think they have done a very good job over the years, but from time to time they dostray.


A.1. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL SESSION(S).

RECOMMENDATION: That the Minutes of Meeting No. 50, dated September 24, 1991, be adopted as circulated.

MOVED Alderman Alderman Campbell – McKay

That Council concur with the recommendation.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter, Mackenzie,Mason, McKay, Paull, Staroszik.

ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, White.

A.2. EMERGENT MATTERS - HALF HOUR QUESTION PERIOD.

Alderman Campbell requested the permission of Council to introduce a Motion Without the Customary Notice.

MOVED Alderman Hayter – Binder

That Alderman Campbell be permitted to introduce a motion without the customary notice.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter, Mackenzie,McKay, Paull, Staroszik.

OPPOSED: Alderman Mason.ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, White.

Alderman Campbell stated the following:

WHEREAS The City of Edmonton is the supply centre for Northern Alberta;

AND WHEREAS Responsible developments in Northern Alberta are important to our community;

AND WHEREAS The benefits of these developments, both in the City of Edmonton and Northern Alberta strengthen our tax base and reduce the burden on the residential tax payer;

AND WHEREAS It is important that the City of Edmonton portray a positive image to attract further business and industrial development;


AND WHEREAS Business and industrial development creates new jobs for all sections of the labour force;

MOVED Alderman Campbell – Hayter

That City Council go on record as strongly supporting development projects in Northern Alberta, including responsible and sustainable pulp and paper industries due to the positive contribution they make to the city of Edmonton.

A copy of Alderman Campbell's Notice Without the Customary Notice was distributed to all members of Council and was filed with the City Clerk.

AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Bethel – McKay

That after the word "supporting", the words "responsible and sustainable" be added and that the phrase "including responsible and sustainable pulp and paper industries" be deleted.

AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Mackenzie – Binder

That the phrase "including pulp and paper industries" be inserted after the word "Alberta".

On a Point of Order, Alderman Mason stated the following:

That simply amends the amendment back to Alderman Mackenzie's original motion.


OPPOSED: Alderman Mason.ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, White.

Alderman White entered Council Chambers.

Mayor Reimer vacated the Chair and the Deputy Mayor, Alderman Bethel, assumed the Chair.

AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT MOVED Mayor Reimer - Alderman Mason

That the phrase "that respects aboriginal rights" be inserted after the word "Alberta".

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Alderman Mason. LOSTOPPOSED: Aldermen Bethel, Binder, Campbell, Chichak,


Hayter, Mackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik,White.

ABSENT: Alderman Kozak.

AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Mason - Mayor Reimer

That Council invite Chief Bernard Ominayak to address City Council on the situation facing northern native people, particularly the Lubicon people.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Alderman Mason. LOSTOPPOSED: Aldermen Bethel, Binder, Campbell, Chichak,

Hayter, Mackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik,White.


Deputy Mayor, Alderman Bethel, vacated the Chair, and Mayor Reimer assumed the Chair.

Alderman Bethel left the meeting and returned a few minutes later.

MOTION OF ALDERMAN BETHEL AS AMENDED put and declared.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter, Mackenzie,McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.

OPPOSED: Alderman Mason.ABSENT: Alderman Kozak.

Alderman Mackenzie left the meeting and returned a few minutes later.

Mayor Reimer vacated the Chair and the Deputy Mayor, Alderman Bethel, assumed the Chair.

Mayor Reimer stated the following:

I have gone on record personally, and my letter indicated that I support the importance of economic development to Northern Alberta. My comments were that the ProvincialGovernment and Daishowa must move to settle the problems that we are seeing in Northern Alberta.

Deputy Mayor, Alderman Bethel vacated the Chair and Mayor Reimer assumed the Chair.

MOTION OF ALDERMAN CAMPBELL AS AMENDED put and declared.

FOR THE MOTION: Alderman Bethel, Binder, Campbell, CARRIEDChichak, Hayter, Mackenzie, McKay,Paull, Staroszik, White.

OPPOSED: Mayor Reimer, Alderman Mason.ABSENT: Alderman Kozak.


Alderman White left the meeting.

MOVED Alderman Mackenzie – Binder

That Bylaws 9703, 9704 and 9999 be dealt with immediately after the matter on the Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter, Mackenzie,Mason, McKay, Paull, Staroszik.

ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, White.

BYLAWS 9703, 9704 AND 9999 WERE DEALT WITH ON PAGES 2529-2535.

MOVED Alderman McKay - No Seconder

That the Aldermanic Inquiries/Suggestions be dealt with after the Public Hearing Bylaws.

NO SECONDERAlderman Mason left the meeting.

MOVED Alderman Campbell - Binder

That the Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation matter be brought forward to be dealt with at this time.


ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, Mason, White.

D.1. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORTS 94, 95 and 96.

Executive Committee Report 94 .

6. Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation, Option to Lease of Lots 6 and 7, Block 5, Plan 1839 T.R.

YOUR COMMITTEE REPORTS:

That it considered the above noted item, together with areport prepared by the Planning & Development Department dated September 5, 1991.


YOUR COMMITTEE FURTHER REPORTS:

A. That the following recommendations of the Administration were considered:

1. That City approve an option for a long termlease of Lots 6 and 7, Block 5. Plan 1839 T.R.to the Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation forthe nominal fee of $1.00 on the general termsand conditions as outlined in Enclosure 1.

2. That the utilities to the Civic Block beturned off and that the Administration conductonly the basic maintenance procedures necessary to satisfy statutory requirements.

B. That it requested the Administration report back on the differences between the original proposal (Phase I) and the current proposal at the September 24, 1991 City Council Meeting.

C. The following motions were passed:

1. That the Committee refer the matter entirely to City Council, in Committee of the Whole, with the recommendations.

2. That representatives of the Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation and Ms. H. Hunter be invited to speak to City Council on this matter.

3. That City Council deal with this item at its September 24, 1991 meeting at the time specific of 10:30 a.m.

THIS ITEM WAS REFERRED TO CITY COUNCIL WITHOUT A RECOMMENDATION.

MOVED Alderman Staroszik – Chichak

That the representatives of the Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation and Ms. Hope Hunter be permitted to speak to City Council on this matter.


ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, Mason, White.

Messrs. T. Banks, Doug McConnell and Ms. Hunter answered Council'squestions.


Alderman Mason re-entered Council Chambers.

Alderman McKay left the meeting.

Alderman Bethel left the meeting.

Alderman McKay re-entered Council Chambers.

Alderman Bethel re-entered Council Chambers.

Alderman Paull left the meeting and returned a few minutes later.

Alderman Mackenzie left the meeting.

Alderman Binder left the meeting.

Alderman Mason left the meeting.

Alderman Binder re-entered Council Chambers.

Alderman Bethel left the meeting

Alderman White re-entered Council Chambers.

Alderman Mackenzie re-entered Council Chambers.



Copies of a petition from the Ordo Templo Orientis Society of Edmonton, 9720 - 102 Avenue, were distributed to all members of Council.

MOVED Alderman Binder – McKay

That Orders of the Day be extended to complete this item.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Alder-men Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter, Kozak, Mackenzie,Mason, McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.


(cont'd. on page 2526.)

Alderman Paull left the meeting.

Alderman Staroszik left the meeting.

Alderman Paull re-entered Council Chambers.


Alderman Staroszik re-entered Council Chambers.

Orders of the Day were called.

Council recessed at 12:08 p.m.

Council reconvened at 1:36 p.m.

F. DELEGATIONS/STATUTORY PROTESTS.


For those of you, who have never attended a Public Hearing before, I would like to just briefly outline the process we will be following.

The Clerk will first call all of the Bylaws. I have here the names of those individuals, who have registered. If you have not registered, I would like you to stand after the bylaw has been read and indicate your name and address, if you are in support or in opposition.

Following that, Council will work its way through the bylaws, trying to start with those that appear the least controversial - housekeeping items - and then moving onto those that there are a fair number of people wishing to speak.

The bylaw will be introduced by the Administration. This will be followed by those speaking in support of the bylaw and then those in opposition. I would ask each presenter to restrict their comments to five minutesWhen you have one minute left, a yellow light will appearat the podium and we would ask you to sum up when the redlight comes on because that means your time is up. Council may ask questions so, please stay at the podium until the questions are complete. We will move from those in support to those in opposition, following which, we will ask questions of the Administration.

If any new information surfaces during any of the questions or presentations, you have a right to address that new information prior to the hearing being closed. I would ask that you identify what this new information is and subsequently to come down to the podium and address that new information. We will then close the public hearing, debate the bylaw and deal with the matter.



Members of Council were requested to consider the following bylaws for first reading and public hearing in the order, as listed:

F.1.a./G.1.a. Bylaw 9809F.1.b./G.1.b. Bylaw 9810F.1.c./G.1.c. Bylaw 9877F.1.d./G.1.d. Bylaw 9883F.1.e./G.1.e. Bylaw 9902F.1.f./G.1.f. Bylaw 9903F.1.g./G.1.g. Bylaw 9896F.1.h./G.1.h. Bylaw 9914F.1.i./G.1.i. Bylaw 9917F.1.j./G.1.j. Bylaw 9923F.1.k./G.1.k. Bylaw 9925

Bylaws 9809 and 9810 were read together.

F.1.a./G.1.a. Bylaw No.9809 - To Adopt the Aurum Industrial Business Park Area Structure Plan and to repeal Bylaw No. 9495, being the Aurum Industrial Area Structure Plan, located north of Highway 16 and west of 33 Street, N.E., Aurum Industrial.

HISTORY

The Planning and Development Department supports this bylaw.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to adopt the Aurum Industrial Business Park Area Structure Plan and to repeal the Aurum Industrial Area Structure Plan that was adopted to accommodate the City of Edmonton' proposed landfill. The adoption of Bylaw 9809 and the adoption of the associated redistricting Bylaw 9810 will permit reversion to the industrial development opportunities allowed under the former Aurum Industrial Business Park Area Structure Plan.

F.1.b./G.1.b. Bylaw No. 9810 - To Amend the Land Use Bylaw from A(metropolitan Recreation) District and DC5 (SiteSpecific Development Control) District to A(Metropolitan Recreation) District, IB (IndustrialBusiness) District, IM (Medium Industrial) Districtand IH (Heavy Industrial) District for all of22-53-23-W4M, a portion of NE 15-53-23-W4M and SE21-52-23-W4M; located north of Highway 16 and westof 33 Street, N.E., Aurum Industrial.

2488

HISTORY

The Planning and Development Department supports this amendment.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend the Land Use District Map from A and DC5 to AG, IB, IM and IH. The proposed detailed application ofindustrial land use districts recognizes the developmentopportunities allowed under the former Aurum Industrial Business ParkArea Structure Plan in effect prior to the adoption of the Area Structure Plan and redistricting bylaws pertaining to the City's proposed landfill facility.

The City Clerk stated if there were an persons present to speak to the passing of Bylaws 9809 and 9810, they would now be heard.

Mr. J. Agrios, 1990 Scotia Place, 10060 Jasper Avenue, was inattendance to speak-in favour of the passing of Bylaws 9809 and 9810.

Mr. P. Greenways, 6007 - 76 Avenue, T6B 0A7. was in attendance to speak in opposition to the passing of Bylaws 9809 and 9810.

BYLAWS 9809 and 9810 WERE DEALT WITH ON PAGES 2495-2498.

Alderman Bethel entered Council Chambers.

F.1.c./G.1.c. Bylaw No. 9877 - To Close the North-South Laneabutting Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. Plan 6123 HW;located east of 97 Street and north of 56 Avenue,Coronet, Southeast Industrial.

HISTORY

The Planning and Development Department supports this closure.

At the regular meeting of City Council held on September 10, 1991, Bylaw 9877 was postponed to the October 8, 1991 meeting.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to close the above-noted lane. Once closed, the area will be consolidated with the abutting lots.

The City Clerk stated if there were any persons present to speak to the passing of Bylaw 9877, they would now be heard.

Messrs. D. Zak, 10567 - 109 Street and H. Zegglarr, 7727 – 127Avenue, T5C 1R9, were in attendance to speak in favour of the passing of Bylaw 9877.

Alderman Chichak entered Council Chambers.

Council MinutesOctober 8, 1991

Andrew Elgert, Elalta Holding Co., 10967 - 123 Street, T5M 0E1, was in attendance to speak in opposition to the passing of Bylaw 9877.

Paul Tietzen, 110 Westbrook Drive, T6J AEG, was in attendance to speak in opposition to the passing of Bylaw 9877.

Sean McManus, 10410 - 81 Avenue, T6E 1X5, was in attendance to speak in opposition to the passing of Bylaw 9877.

Mr. K. Snyder, 5714 - 96 Street, T6E 3G1, was in attendance to speak in opposition to the passing of Bylaw 9877.

BYLAW 9877 WAS DEALT WITH ON PAGE 2498.

Bylaws 9883, 9902 and 9903 were read together.

F.1.d./G.1.d. Bylaw No. 9883 - To Amend Bylaw No. 6259, asamended being the Twin Brooks Neighbourhood AreaStructure Plan, located west of 111 Street andsouth of Blackmud Creek Ravine, Twin Brooks.

HISTORY


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend Bylaw 6259, as amended, being the Twin Brooks Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan. This amendment proposes to shift the alignment of 119 Street to the east to permit development of the lands above the top-of-the-bank in the SE ¼36-51-24-W4M and proposes a land use intent for low to medium density residential development in the aforementioned area.

F.1.e./G.1.e. Bylaw No. 9902 - To Amend Bylaw No. 6259, asamended, being the Twin Brooks Neighbourhood AreaStructure Plan, located west of 111 Street andsouth of Blackmud Creek Ravine, Twin Brooks.

HISTORY


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend Bylaw 6259, as amended, being the Twin Brooks Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan. The amendment proposes the relocation of a neighbourhood convenience commercial site, a reduction in the size of a rowhousing site and the intended development of that site under the auspices of the RF5 District asopposed to the original intent of employing a DC5 district and a


change in the land use intent for a cul de sac to the east of theschool/park site from single detached residential to semi-detached residential.

F.1.f./G.1.f. Bylaw No. 9903 - To Amend the Land Use Bylaw fromAG (Agricultural) District and AGU (Urban Reserve)District to RF1 (Single Detached Residential)District, RF4 (Semi-Detached Residential) District,RF5 (Row Housing) District, DC5 (Site SpecificDevelopment Control) District and A (MetropolitanRecreation) District; portions of the W 1/2 ofSection 31-51-24-W4M; located west of 111 Streetand south of Blackmud Creek Ravine, Twin Brooks.

HISTORY


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend the Land Use District Map fromAG and AGU to RF1. RF4, RF5, DC5 and A. The proposed amendment willallow single-detached residential dwellings, semi-detached residential dwellings, row-housing, a development containingconvenience commercial and personal service uses, with site specific development controls, and the "A" designation will be applied to the area that falls within the Blackmud Creek Ravine.

The City Clerk stated if there were any persons present to speak tothe passing of Bylaws 9883, 9902 and 9903, they would now be heard.

Mr. R. Bell, 10205 - 100 Avenue, T5J 485, was in attendance to speak in favour of the passing of Bylaws 9883, 9902 and 9903.

Mr. A. Bryan, Bryan Wilson, 2600 Manulife Place, 10180 - 101 Street,T5J 3Y2, was in attendance to speak in favour of the passing ofBylaws 9883, 9902 and 9903.

Mayor Reimer asked whether there was any objection to having thebylaws read together.

Mr. Bell requested that Bylaw 9883 be dealt with separately fromBylaws 9902 and 9903.


BYLAWS 9902 AND 9903 WERE DEALT WITH ON PAGE 2516.


F.1.g./G.1.g. Bylaw No. 9896 - To Amend the Land Use Bylaw fromIH (Heavy Industrial) District to CB2 (GeneralBusiness) District; portions of Lot 62, Blocks 16,Plan 7261 AB; Lots 57 - 62 inclusive, Block 17,Plan 7261 AB and Lots 292 296 inclusive, Block 18,Plan 4423 AJ, and portions of 117 and 118 Streetsin Plan 7261 AB between 104 Avenue and thesoutherly limit of C.N.R. Railway Plan No. 9,located north of 104 Avenue and west of 116 Street,Hudson Bay Reserve.

HISTORY


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend the Land Use District Map from IH to CB2, in order to allow the development containing general business and commercial uses on the site.


Mr. R. Watkins, 700, 10160 - 112 Street, T5K 2L6, was in attendance to speak in favour of the passing of Bylaw 9896.


F.1.h./G.1.h. Bylaw No. 9914 - To Amend the Land Use Bylaw fromDC5 (Site Specific Development Control) District toDC5 (Site Specific Development Control) District,Lots 2 and 3, Block 11, Plan 912 2242 and Lot 1.Block 1, Plan 892 2540, located northeast of theintersection of 38 Avenue and 34 Street, Larkspur,The Meadows.

HISTORY


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend the Land Use District Map from DC5 to DC5 to revise the height and setback criteria for a site presently districted to permit retail and commercial developments with site specific development controls.

The City Clerk stated if there were any persons present to speak tothe passing of Bylaw 9914, they would now be heard.


Mr. D. Morris, Ste. 1901 Capitol Square, 10065 Jasper Avenue, T5J 3B1, was in attendance to speak in favour of the passing of Bylaw 9914.


F.1.i./G.1.i. Bylaw No. 9917 - To Amend the Land Use Bylaw from18 (Industrial Business) District to US (UrbanServices) District; Lots 1, 2, 3, 16 and 17, Block1, Plan 3597 NY, located at 9125 - 50 Street,Lambton Park, Southeast Industrial.

HISTORY


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend the Land Use District Map from 18 to US to allow conversion of a vacant hotel complex (Capilano Inn)to a-private educational facility with a student residentialcomponent.


Mr. C. Dezewart, R.R. 6, Site 12, Box 7, T5E 4K3. was in attendance to speak in favour of the passing of Bylaw 9917.


F.1.i./G.1.i. Bylaw No. 9923 - To Amend the Land Use Bylaw fromAG (Agricultural) District (M.D. of Sturgeon) CSC(Shopping Centre) District to DC5 (Site SpecificDevelopment Control) District, a portion of NE5-54-24-W4M; located north of 176 Avenue and eastof 99 Street, Elsinore.

HISTORY


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend the Land Use District Map from AG (M.D. of Sturgeon) and CSC to DC5. The proposed DC5 for Area A will allow a range of commercial uses with site specific developmentcontrols. Area B will allow for a range of commercial uses oralternately residential uses in the form of semi-detached, row


housing or stacked row housing with site specific development controls.


Mr. D. Morris, Ste. 1901 Capitol Square, 10065 Jasper Avenue, T5J 3B1, was in attendance to speak in opposition to the passing of Bylaw 9923.

MOVED Alderman Paull - Staroszik

That Bylaw 9923 be struck from Council's agenda.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter, Mackenzie,Mason, McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.


F.1.k./G.1.k. Bylaw No. 9925 - To Amend Bylaw No. 8733, asamended, the Lewis Farms Area Structure Plan,located east of Winterburn Road (215 Street) andnorth of Whitemud Drive (79 Avenue), BreckenridgeGreens, Lewis Farms.

HISTORY


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend Bylaw 8733, as amended, the Lewis Farms Area Structure Plan by adding the Breckenridge GreensNieghbourhood Structure Plan. The proposed Neighbourhood Structure Plan will establish the overall pattern for residential developmentfor Neighbourhood 2 of the Lewis Farms Area Structure Plan. This plan will then be used in the evaluation of future redistricting and subdivision proposals for this area.


Mr. K. McKenzie, 10102 - 125 Street, T5N 1S6 was in attendance to speak in favour of the passing of Bylaw 9925.

MOVED Alderman White - Hayter

That Bylaws 9896, 9914 and 9917 be now read a first time.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter Mackenzie,


Mason, McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White. ABSENT: Alderman Kozak.

Bylaws 9896, 9914 and 9917 were read a first time.

MOVED Alderman White - Paull

That Bylaws 9896, 9914 and 9917 be now read a second time.



Bylaws 9896, 9914 and 9917 were read a second time.


That Bylaws 9896, 9914 and 9917 be considered for third reading.




That Bylaws 9896, 9914 and 9917 be now read a third time and finally passed.



Bylaws 9896, 9914 and 9917 were read a third time and were finally passed.


That Bylaw 9925 be now read a first time.



Bylaw 9925 was read a first time.



Mr. McKenzie answered Council's questions.

Alderman Mackenzie requested that the developer, at the subdivision stage, address the walkways for pedestrians.

MOVED Alderman White - Chichak

That Bylaw 9925 be now read a second time.


ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, Mason.

Bylaw 9925 was read a second time.

MOVED Alderman White - Chichak

That Bylaw 9925 be considered for third reading.



MOVED Alderman White - Campbell

That Bylaw 9925 be now read a third time and finally passed.



Bylaw 9925 was read a third time and was finally passed.



1:52 - 2:32 p.m.

F.1.a./G.1.a. Bylaw No. 9809 - To Adopt the Aurum IndustrialBusiness Park Area Structure Plan and to repealBylaw No. 9495, being the Aurum Industrial Area Structure Plan, located north of Highway 16 andwest of 33 Street, N.E., Aurum Industrial.


F.1.b./G.1.b. Bylaw No. 9810 - To Amend the Land Use Bylaw from A(Metropolitan Recreation) District and DC5 (SiteSpecific Development Control) District to A(Metropolitan Recreation) District, IB (IndustrialBusiness) District, IM (Medium Industrial) Districtand IH (Heavy Industrial) District for all of22-53-23-W4M, a portion of NE 15-53-23-W4M and SE21-52-23-W4M; located north of Highway 16 and westof 33 Street, N.E., Aurum Industrial.

Mr. B. Mohr, Planning and Development Department, made the Administration's presentation.

Mr. Agrios made his presentation and answered Council's questions.


Mr. Greenways made his presentation and answered Council's questions.

Mr. Mohr answered Council's questions.

Mayor Reimer asked whether there was any new information that the presenters wished to respond to.

Mr. Greenways responded and made a further presentation.

MOVED Alderman White – McKay

That the Public Hearing on Bylaw 9809 be now closed.



MOVED Alderman White – Staroszik








FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter Mackenzie,Mason, McKay, Paull, Staroszik White.



MOVED Alderman Mackenzie – McKay


FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter, Mackenzie,Mason, McKay, Paull, Staroszik White.


MOVED Alderman Mackenzie - Staroszik





Mayor Reimer asked whether there was any objection to the continuance of dealing with Bylaw 9810 in conjunction with Bylaw 9809.

Mr. Greenways responded and made a further presentation.



Mr. Greenways made a further presentation and answered Councils questions.

MOVED Alderman White - Staroszik


FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Hayter, Mason,McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.

ABSENT: Aldermen Bethel, Kozak, Mackenzie.












MOVED Alderman White – Paull




MOVED Alderman White – Campbell

That Bylaw 9810 be now read a third time andfinally passed.




2:32 - 4:40 p.m.

F.1.c./G.1.c. Bylaw No. 9877 - To Close the North-South Laneabutting Lots 6 and 7. Block 3, Plan 6123 HW;located east of 97 Street and north of 56 Avenue,Coronet, Southeast Industrial.


Mr. T.J. Loat, Planning and Development Department, made the Administration's presentation.

Alderman Paull left the meeting and returned a few minutes later.

Alderman Campbell left the meeting.


Mr. Zak made his presentation and answered Council's questions.


Alderman Campbell re-entered Council Chambers.

Mr. Elgert made his presentation.


Mr. Tietzen as President of Tietzen Consulting and Development made his presentation, pursuant to Subsection 104(1)(a) of The Planning Act, and answered Council's questions.


Mr. Tietzen as President of M & W made his presentation, pursuant to Subsection 104(1)(a) of The Planning Act, and answered Council's questions.



Mr. McManus made his presentation and answered Council's questions.


Mr. Snyder made his presentation. Copies of statistics of exit and entrance of trucks in and out of the lane, prepared by Frank Henry Equipment, were distributed to all members of Council. Mr. Snyderanswered Council's questions.Mr. R. Millican, Transportation Department, answered Council'squestions.







Alderman Staroszik left the meeting and returned a few minutes later.

MOVED Alderman Binder – Hayter

That Orders of the Day be extended to complete Bylaw 9877.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDChichak, Hayter, Mackenzie, Mason, McKay,Paull, Staroszik.

ABSENT: Aldermen Campbell, Kozak, White.



Mr. Loat, Planning and Development Department, answered Council's questions.



Mr. Millican, Transportation Department, answered Council's questions.



Mayor Reimer asked if there was any new information that the presenters wished to respond to.

Mr. Zak responded and made a further presentation.

Mr. Van Zegglarr answered Council's questions.

Mr. Elgart responded and made a further presentation.

MOVED Alderman Hayter – Campbell


FOR THE MOTION: Aldermen Binder, Campbell, Hayter. LOSTOPPOSED: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak,

Mackenzie, Mason, McKay, Paull, Staroszik.ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, White.




That Bylaw 9877 be referred back to the Administration to prepare a report for submission to the November 5. 1991 Council meeting and that the report address the following:

1. Ensure that all vehicles, including semi-trailers,can safely and easily maneuver the proposed "L"turn laneway.

2. Identify a similar laneway configuration in anindustrial area which has semi-trailer traffic.

3. Survey adjacent property owners for each of theirlaneway requirements.

4. Review the parking requirements in the area inorder to address the present parking problems.

AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Paull - McKay

That the Administration be permitted to walk therequested report on to the next regular meeting of City Council to be held on October 22, 1991.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Campbell, CARRIEDChichak, Mackenzie, Mason, McKay, Paull,Staroszik.

OPPOSED: Alderman Hayter.ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Kozak, White.

MOTION OF ALDERMAN STAROSZIK AS AMENDED put and declared.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Campbell, CARRIEDChichak, Mackenzie, Mason, McKay, Paull,Staroszik.

OPPOSED: Alderman Hayter.ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Kozak, White.

Aldermen Chichak, Hayter and Mackenzie left the meeting.

Members of Council were requested to consider Bylaws 9916 and 9918 for Public Hearing and first reading.



4:40 - 6:10 p.m.

7:05 - 12:30 a.m.

Mayor Reimer asked whether there was any objection to Bylaws 9916 and 9918 being dealt with together.

There was no objection.

F.l.l./G.1.1. Bylaw No. 9916 - To Amend Bylaw No. 7064, asamended, the York Neighbourhood Area StructurePlan, located north of 137 Avenue and east of 56Street, York, Steele Heights.

HISTORY

The Planning and Development Department does not support this amendment for the following reasons:

1. the proposed Plan amendment and Land Use Bylaw amendment are contrary to General Municipal PlanPolicies 1.B.1 and 1.B.4 regarding the need tomaintain community stability and to encourage

appropriate residential redevelopment in mature neighbourhoods;

2. there are sufficient existing commercial sites to accommodate the community level shopping needs within the primary urban trade area and that the intrusion of an additional commercial site into an existing neighbourhood is not warranted;

3. the proposed commercial development may adverselyaffect the viability of the Clareview Town Centre andis contrary to the intent of Policy 3.B.3 of the

General Municipal Plan which encourages the prompt development of the Clareview Town Centre.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend Bylaw 7064, as amended, the York Neighbourhood Structure Plan. The effect of the proposed amendment is two fold. Firstly, a 9.2 hectare area, comprised of a surplus portion of the 137 Avenue right-of-way and two parcels known locally as the St. Mary's Boys School site, would be added to the southwestern portion of the Plan area. Secondly, the proposed amendment would designate future land uses for the St. Mary's site and for lands to the east. Specifically, the north portion of the St. Mary's site and an adjacent site would be designated for singledetached residential development. The south portion of the St.Mary's site and lands to the east would be designated for a


commercial shopping centre having a potential gross floor area of approximately 20,000 square metres.

F.1.m./G.l.m. Bylaw No. 9918 - To Amend the Land Use Bylaw fromAGU (Urban Reserve) District, RF1 (Single DetachedResidential) District, RF6 (Medium Density MultipleFamily) District, RA7 (Low Rise Apartment)District, and DC5 (Site Specific DevelopmentControl) District to DC5 (Site Specific DevelopmentControl) District, Block 22, Plan 5631 MC, Lot C,Plan 5668 KS, Lots 49, 50 and 51, Block 54, Plan862 0996 and a portion of 137 Avenue right-of-wayto be closed by Bylaw, located north of 137 Avenueand east of 56 Street, York, Steele Heights.

HISTORY

The Planning and Development Department does not support this amendment for the following reasons:

1. the proposed Plan amendment and Land Use Bylaw amendment are contrary to General Municipal PlanPolicies 1.B.1 and 1.B.4 regarding the need to

maintain community stability and to encourage appropriate residential redevelopment in mature neighbourhoods;

2. there are sufficient existing commercial sites to accommodate the community level shopping needs within the primary urban trade area and that the intrusion of an additional commercial site into an existing neighbourhood is not warranted;

3. the proposed commercial development may adverselyaffect the viability of the Clareview Town Centre

and is contrary to the intent of Policy 3.B.3 ofthe General Municipal Plan which encourages theprompt development of the Clareview Town Centre.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend the Land Use District Map from AGU, RF1, RF6, RA7 and DC5 to accommodate development of a commercial shopping centre development with site specific development controls.

The Assistant City Clerk stated if there were any persons present tospeak to the passing of Bylaws 9916 and 9918, they would now beheard.

In favour of the passing of Bylaws 9916 and 9918:


Mr. A. Bryan, Bryan, Wilson, 2600 Manulife Place, 10180 - 101 Street, T5J 3Y2.Father David Dickenson, representing St. Mary's Salesian School.Terry MacDougall, IPS Consultants, 14640 - 86 Avenue, T5R 4J8.Jim Price, 50 Village on the Green.Joe Coutts, 5528 - 139 Avenue, T5A 4R4.Irene Anselmos, 5619 -138 Avenue, T5J 3N9.Jim Dallin, #1112 - 10235 - 101 Street, T5J 3G1.Rod Sullivan, 18325 Stony Plain Road, T5S 1C8.Denny Thomas, Milner Fenerty, 2900 Manulife Place, 10180 - 101 Street, T5J 3S4.Richard Talbott, Managing Partner, Thomas Consultants, 910 Pender Place, Vancouver, B.C.Irv Kipnes, President, Delcon Centres Ltd., 1200, 10130 - 103 Street, T5J 3N9.Michael Kenney, Canada Safeway Limited, 47th Floor, West Tower, Calgary, Alberta UP 2J6.

In Opposition to the passing of Bylaws 9916 and 9918:

Hans Laan, North East Action Group, 5311 - 139 Avenue, T5A 4R4Manfred Malzahn, North East Action Group, 5912 - 141 Avenue, T5A 1H8.Will Vandenborn, North East Action Group, 5711 - 139 Avenue, T5A 1E8Don Sawchuk, President, Steele Heights Community League, 5825 – 104Avenue, T5A 1G5.Katherine Daynes, 5616 - 140A Avenue, T5A 1H3. Wendy Dehod, 5520 - 104A Avenue, T5A 1H3. Leonard McEwen, Automation Resource Centre, Ste. 202, 10544 - 114 Street, T5H 3J7. Phyllis Smith, representing Guaranty Properties, 1700 Oxford Tower, Edmonton Centre, T5J 3G1 Darlene Bakker, 13328 - 62 Street, T5A 0V6. Velma Foster, 13912 - 57 Street, T5A 1M6. Gloria Chalifoux, 5611 - 139 Avenue, T5A 1E8. Ken Newman, 13912 - 54 Street, T5A 1L9.


For those of you who have not attended a hearing of Council before, I would just like to outline the procedures that we will be following.

We will hear first an overview from our Administration. This will be followed by those speaking in support of the bylaws and then those in opposition. We would ask that each presenter restrict their comments to five minutes. When you have one minute left, the yellow light will come on here at the podium and when the red light is on, your time is up so, we would ask you to conclude your remarksPlease stay at the podium, because members of Council mayhave questions to ask of you.


Once we have heard from all of the presenters, Councilwill then ask questions of the Administration. I will then ask if anyone wishes to respond to any new information - this is to only new information. If you do, I would ask that you stand, state the new information, come to the podium and, again, follow a similar procedure.

We will then determine if we will close the public hearing and Council will debate the matter.

Mr. T.J. Loat, Planning and Development Department, made the Administration's presentation.


Alderman Chichak re-entered Council Chambers.


Alderman Hayter re-entered Council Chambers.


Mr. Bryan made his presentation and answered Council's questions.


Father Dickenson made his presentation.


Mr. MacDougall made his presentation and answered Council's questions.



That Orders of the Day be extended until 6:00 p.m. and that Council reconvene at 7:00 p.m.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Campbell, CARRIEDChichak, Hayter, Mackenzie, McKay,Paull, Staroszik.

OPPOSED: Alderman Mason.ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Kozak, White.

Mr. MacDougall had distributed copies of an excerpt of Bylaw 2135,The Zoning Bylaw, to all members of Council.


Mr. Price made his presentation and answered Council's questions.



Alderman Mason left the meeting and returned a few minutes later.

Mr. Coutts made his presentation and answered Council's questions.


As Mr. Dallin could not be in attendance at the meeting at 7:00 p.m., he requested that the order of speakers be re-arranged.


Mr. Dallin made his presentation and answered Council's questions.


Alderman Hayter left the meeting.

Council recessed at 6:10 p.m.


MOVED Alderman Mackenzie – Bethel

That Council complete the Public Hearing Bylaws and reconvene on Wednesday, October 9, 1991 at 12:30 p.m. to complete the agenda.

AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman White – Campbell

That Orders of the Day be suspended and that Council continue until 11:00 p.m.

FOR THE MOTION: Aldermen Bethel, Campbell, Chichak, CARRIEDMackenzie, McKay, Staroszik, White.

OPPOSED: Mayor Reimer.ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Hayter, Kozak, Mason, Paull.

NOTION AS AMENDED put and declared.

FOR THE MOTION: Aldermen Bethel, Campbell, Chichak, CARRIEDMackenzie, McKay, Staroszik, White.

OPPOSED: Mayor Reimer.ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Hayter, Kozak, Mason, Paull.

Alderman Paull entered Council Chambers.


Alderman Mason entered Council Chambers.

Mrs. Anselmos made her presentation and answered Council's questions.

Mr. Sullivan made his presentation and answered Council's questions.

Mr. Thomas requested that Council withhold questions until the next presenters had completed their presentations.

Mr. Talbot made his presentation.

Mr. Kipnes made his presentation.

Copies of a petition that was obtained from twenty property owners directly adjacent to and in favour of the proposed development was distributed to all members of Council.

Mr. Talbot answered Council's questions.

Mr. Kenney answered Council's questions.

Alderman McKay left the meeting and returned a few minutes later.

Mr. Talbot answered Council's questions.

Mr. Kipnes answered Council's questions.




Alderman Paull left the meeting,




Mr. Kipnes filed with the City Clerk a letter from Randall Huisman, 39 Steele Crescent, T5A 1G4. a copy of which was distributed to allmembers of Council.

Alderman White left the room.

Mr. Laan made his presentation and answered Council's questions.

Alderman Hayter entered Council Chambers.


Ms. Chalifoux made her presentation.

Mr. Newman made his presentation and answered Council's questions.



Alderman Hayter re-entered Council Chambers.

MOVED Alderman Mason – Chichak

That Orders of the Day be extended to complete these bylaws.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Campbell, Chichak, CARRIEDHayter, Mackenzie, Mason, Paull, Staroszik,White.

OPPOSED: Alderman McKay.ABSENT: Aldermen Bethel, Binder, Kozak.

Mayor Reimer vacated the Chair and Alderman White assumed the Chair.

Mayor Reimer left the meeting.

Mr. T.J. Loat, Planning and Development Department, answered Council's questions.


Mayor Reimer re-entered Council Chambers.

Alderman White vacated the Chair and Mayor Reimer assumed the Chair.

Mr. H. Krone, Planning and Development Department, answered Council's questions.


Mayor Reimer asked whether there was any new information that any of the presenters wished to respond to.

Father Dickenson responded, made a further presentation and answered Council's questions.

Mr. Newman responded and made a further presentation.

MOVED Alderman Mason – McKay

That the Public Hearing for Bylaws 9916 and 9918 be now closed.






Alderman Staroszik re-entered Council Chambers.

Mr. Malzahn made his presentation and answered Council's questions.


Alderman Chichak left the meeting.


Mr. Vanderborn made his presentation.

Mr. Sawchuk made his presentation and answered Council's questions.


Alderman Chichak re-entered Council Chambers.

Ms. Daynes made her presentation.


Ms. Dehod made her presentation.

Mr. McEwen made his presentation and answered Council's questions.

Ms. Smith made her presentation and answered Council's questions.






Ms. Bakker made her presentation and answered Council's questions.


Ms. Foster made her presentation.


FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Campbell, CARRIEDChichak, Hayter, Mackenzie, Mason, McKay,Paull, Staroszik, White.

ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Kozak.

MOVED Alderman Mason - Bethel

That Bylaws 9916 and 9918 be struck from Council's agenda.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Mason. LOSTOPPOSED: Aldermen Campbell, Chichak, Hayter

Mackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Kozak.

MOVED Alderman Paull - White

That Bylaws 9916 and 9918 be now read a first time.

FOR THE MOTION: Aldermen Campbell, Chichak, Hayter CARRIEDMackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.

OPPPOSED: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Mason.ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Kozak.

Bylaws 9916 and 9918 were read a first time.

MOVED Alderman Mackenzie - Bethel

That Bylaws 9916 and 9918 be postponed to the Council meeting to be held in January 1992.

AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman White - McKay

That Bylaws 9916 and 9918 be postponed to the Council meeting to be held on December 10, 1991.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Mackenzie, CARRIEDMason, McKay, Paull, White.

OPPOSED: Aldermen Campbell, Chichak, Hayter,Staroszik.


MOTION AS AMENDED put and declared.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Mackenzie, CARRIEDMason, McKay, Staroszik, White.

OPPOSED: Aldermen Campbell, Chichak, Hayter, Paull.ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Kozak.


MOVED Alderman Mason - Bethel

That the motion to close the public hearing on Bylaws 9916 and 9918 be reconsidered.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Campbell, CARRIEDChichak, Hayter, Mackenzie, Mason, McKay,Paull, Staroszik, White.


MOVED Alderman Mason - McKay

That the Public Hearing for Bylaws 9916 and 9918 be now closed.

FOR THE MOTION: No member of Council. LOSTOPPOSED: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Campbell,

Chichak, Hayter, Mackenzie, Mason, McKay,Paull, Staroszik, White.


Council recessed at 12:30 a.m.



MOVED Alderman Chichak – White

That item E.1.c. be added to Council's agenda.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak, CARRIEDMackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.

ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Campbell, Hayter, Kozak,Mason.

E.1.c. Greater Edmonton Foundation - Application for New LodgeAccommodation - Addendum.

THIS ITEM WAS DEALT WITH ON PAGE 2516.


That Council concur with the recommendations for SectionsC. Answers to Inquiries, D.1. Executive Committee Reportsand E. Other Reports.

Members of Council requested the exemption of:

D.1. Report 94, item 6.Report 95, item 4.Report 96, item 3.

MOTION ON RECOMMENDATIONS (excluding the exemptions) put anddeclared.

FOR THE NOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak, CARRIEDMackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.


C. ANSWERS TO INQUIRIES.

RECOMMENDATION: That the following report be received asinformation.

C.1. Alderman Bethel re: Demand for Larger CommercialDevelopment in the Northeast Area.

RECOMMENDATION: That the report be received as information.


Members of Council considered a report, prepared by the Planning and Development Department, dated September 11, 1991.

(Council concurred with the recommendation.)

D.1. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORTS 94, 95 and 96.

Executive Committe Report 94.

6. Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation, Option to Lease of Lots 6 and 7, Block 5, Plan 1839 T.R.


Executive Committee Report 95.

1. Bylaw No. 9894 - To Amend Bylaw No. 2198 Relating to the City of Edmonton Pension Fund


That it considered the above noted item together with a report prepared by the Personnel Department dated September 4, 1991.

YOUR COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS:

That this item be received as information (i.e. that Bylaw No. 9894 be given the appropriate readings).

(X-Reference - G.1. - Bylaw 9894)


2. Sale of Land Located at 117 Avenue and 96 Street toHabitat for Humanity - Edmonton Society for $1.00 andSale of Land Located at 117 Avenue and 96 Street to theCity of Edmonton Non-Profit Housing Corporation for $1.00


That it considered the above noted item, together with a report prepared by the Community and Family ServicesDepartment dated September 11, 1991 and heard from Mr. J.Lackey.



1. That City Council authorize an exception of the proposed sales from: City Policy C437, the Lease or Sale of City-Owned Land and Social HousingDevelopment (Enclosure I) approved October 2, 1987.

2. That City Council authorize an exception of the proposed sales from: City Policy C208, the Land Management Policy of Land Sales (Enclosure II) approved May 22, 1984.

3. That City Council approve the sale of Lot 23, Block 8, Plan XLIII to Habitat for Humanity – EdmontonSociety (Habitat) for the sum of one dollar ($1.00), subject to the terms and conditionsoutlined in Enclosure III, and the sale of Lots 24

to 26 inclusive and the north half of Lot 27, all in Block 8, Plan XLIII, to the City of EdmontonNon-Profit Housing Corporation (HomeEd) for the sumof one dollar ($1.00) subject to the terms and conditions outlined in Enclosure IV.

(Council concurred with the recommendations.)

3. Reduced Landfill Fees For Charitable Organizations


That it considered the above noted item together with a report prepared by the Public Works Department dated September 17, 1991 and heard from Mr. D. McCallum, Chai man, Goodwill Rehabilitation Services of Alberta andL. Derkach, Executive Director, Bissell Centre.


That the City of Edmonton approve special landfilldisposal rates of $10/tonne to qualifying charitableorganizations for the period from October 1, 1991 toDecember 31, 1992.


4. Laidlaw Application for Waste Facility



Executive Committee Report 96.

1. Bylaw #9775 - To Amend Edmonton Power Bylaw No. 4056 asAmendedBylaw #9790 - To Amend Bylaw #6124, the License BylawBylaw #9882 - A Bylaw Concerning the Sale of the Plan4065 AE, Block 7, Lot 11 Pursuant to the Provisions ofthe Tax Recovery Act 1980Bylaw #9910 - To Amend Bylaw #8053 as Amended toAuthorize the Agreement with the Province for the Designand Construction of the Yellowhead Trail


That it considered the above noted bylaws, together with respective reports from the Administration.


That these items be received as information (i.e. thatBylaws 9775, 9790, 9882 and 9910 be given the appropriate readings).

(X-reference: Bylaw 9775 - G.1.n. Bylaw 9790 - G.1.o. Bylaw 9882 - G.1.p. Bylaw 9910 - G.1.r.)


2. Submission of the City of Edmonton on the Proposed Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act


That it considered the above noted item, together with a report prepared by the Office of the City Solicitor dated September 10, 1991.

YOUR COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS.

1. That Enclosure I entitled Overview of Bill 53 -Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act bereceived as information.

2. That the Office of the Mayor advise the Minister ofthe Environment of the continuing concerns of theCity of Edmonton as set out in Enclosure I and any


other requested revisions to Bill 53 that Council deems appropriate.

3. That the City Solicitor and the Office of theEnvironment monitor and comment on regulationsproposed pursuant to the Environmental Protectionand Enhancement Legislation.

(Council concurred with the recommendations.)

3. Business Innovation Centre - Request for Financial Support


E. OTHER REPORTS.

E.1.a. Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation, Option to Lease of Lots6 and 7, Block 5, Plan 1839 T.R. - Additional Information.




E.1.b. River Valley Development, Rossdale and Cloverdale.




E.1.c. Greater Edmonton Foundation - Application for New Lodge Accommodation - Addendum.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City of Edmonton support the application by the Greater Edmonton Foundation to the Minister

of Municipal Affairs for the construction of two,


sixty-five bed senior citizen lodges to be located in the city of Edmonton.

Members of Council considered a letter from John Gullion, Chairman of the Board, Greater Edmonton Foundation, 810, 10050 - 112 Street, T5K 2R4, dated October 2, 1991.


F. STATUTORY PROTESTS.

F.1.d./G.1.d. Bylaw No. 9883 - To Amend Bylaw No. 6259, as amended being the Twin Brooks Neighbourhood AreaStructure Plan, located west of 111 Street and south of Blackmud Creek Ravine, Twin Brooks.


Mr. A. Bryan, Bryan, Wilson, 2600 Manulife Place, 10180 - 101 Street, T5J 3Y2, was in attendance to speak in favour of the passing of Bylaw 9883.

Mr. R. Bell, 10205 - 100 Avenue, T5J 4B5, was in attendance to speak in favour of the passing of Bylaw 9883.








FOR THE NOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak, CARRIEDMackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.

ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Campbell, Hayter, KozakMason.



MOVED Alderman Mackenzie - Chichak









The City Clerk called Bylaws 9902 and 9903 together.

F.1.e./G.1.e. Bylaw No. 9902 - To Amend Bylaw No. 6259, asamended, being the Twin Brooks Neighbourhood AreaStructure Plan, located west of 111 Street andsouth of Blackmud Creek Ravine, Twin Brooks.

F.1.f./G.1.f. Bylaw No. 9903 - To Amend the Land Use Bylaw fromAG (Agricutural) District and AGU (Urban Reserve)District to RF1 (Single Detached Residential)District, RF4 (Semi-Detached Residential) District,RF5 (Row Housing) District, DC5 (Site SpecificDevelopment Control) District and A (MetropolitanRecreation) District; portions of the W 1/2 ofSection 31-51-24-W4M; located west of 111 Streetand south of Blackmud Creek Ravine, Twin Brooks.

Mr. A. Bryan, Bryan, Wilson, 2600 Manulife Place, 10180 - 101 Street, T5J 3Y2, was in attendance to answer questions with respect to the passing of Bylaw 9902 and 9903.

Mayor Reimer asked whether there was any objection to Bylaws 9902 and 9903 being dealt with together.


MOVED Alderman Mackenzie - Paull

That Bylaws 9902 and 9903 be now read a first time.




Bylaws 9902 and 9903 were read a first time.


That Bylaws 9902 and 9903 be now read a second time.



Bylaws 9902 and 9903 were read a second time.




FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak, CARRIEDMackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik.

ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Campbell, Hayter, Kozak,Mason, White.

MOVED Alderman Mackenzie - McKay





MOVED Alderman Mackenzie - McKay


FOR THE NOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak, CARRIEDMackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik.

ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Campbell, Hayter Kozak,Mason, White.






Alderman White re-entered the meeting.


That the First Reading Bylaws be brought forward to be dealt with at this time.



G.1. FIRST READING BYLAWS.

Members of Council were asked to consider the following bylaws for first reading in the order, as listed:

G.1.n. Bylaw 9775G.1.o. Bylaw 9790G.1.p. Bylaw 9882G.1.q. Bylaw 9894G.1.r. Bylaw 9910

G.1.n. Bylaw No. 9775 - To Amend Edmonton Power Bylaw No. 4056,as amended.

RECOMMENDATION: That the report (Enclosure II) be received as information.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to authorize Edmonton Power to provide for the inspection of communication systems and the licensing of Communication Systems Installers.

G.1.o. Bylaw No. 9790 - To Amend Bylaw No. 6124, the License Bylaw.


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to ensure consistency, for licensingpurposes, with amendments to be made to the Edmonton Power Bylaw, and to specify the master trades designations.

G.1.p. Bylaw No. 9882 - A Bylaw Concerning the Sale of thePlan 4065 AE, Block 7, Lot 11 Pursuant to the Provisions of the Tax Recovery Act 1980.

'PURPOSE

The purpose of this bylaw is to allow the City to sell the subject property acquired pursuant to tax recovery proceedings of the Tax Recovery Act to the previous owner who still occupies the premises. The Department of Municipal Affairs has advised the City Solicitor that the sale will require approval of the Minister.

G.1.q. Bylaw No. 9894 - To Amend Bylaw No. 2198 Relating to the City of Edmonton Pension Fund.

HISTORY

Since January 1, 1975, pensions, administered by The City of Edmonton Pension Fund, have been granted semi-annual cost-of-living increases which have been pased on the Consumer Price Index for the EdmontonRegion. The semi-annual increases granted maintain parity with theoverall annual cost-of-living increase. The last increase granted was 2.64% - effective as of January 1, 1991.

A motion was passed by The City of Edmonton Pension Fund SupervisoryBoard on September 4, 1991 recommending that an increase of pensions by 3.4% - effective July 1, 1991, be granted, thereby reflecting theincrease in the Consumer Price Index for the Edmonton Region duringthe first hald of 1991. The increase to pensions will be effective July 1, 1991.

G.1.r. Bylaw No. 9910 - To Amend Bylaw No. 8053 as Amendedto Authorize the Agreement with the Province for theDesign and Construction of the Yellowhead Trail.

HISTORY

At the meeting of City Council held November 26, 1985, Bylaw 8053 wasread a first, second and third time and was duly passed, authorizing the original agreement.

At the City Council meeting of January 16, 1990, Bylaw 9365 received three readings and was duly passed, authorizing amendments to the original agreement.


The Public Works Department's 1991 Capital Budget and the Corporate Priorities Plan 1991-1995 were approved by City Council on September 11, 1990, and included the design and construction of the Yellowhead Trail/Capilano Drive Interchange under Project No. 89-35-7510 and Yellowhead Trail/66 Street Intersection under Project No. 90-35-7344.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this Bylaw is to amend the agreement with theGovernment of Alberta dated November 27, 1985 for the design and construction of the yellowhead Trail Corridor. Under the original agreement, the Province contributed $15.5 million towards the design and construction of the Yellowhead Trail/82 Street Interchange and the reconstruction of the Clover Bar Bridge, later increased by $3.0 million to $18.5 million. In October, 1988, the Province granted an additional $15.5 million during 1989 to 1993 for the design and construction of the Yellowhead Trail/Capilano Drive Extension Interchange.

MOVED Alderman White - McKay

That Council concur with the recommendation for Bylaw 9775.



Alderman Hayter entered Council Chambers.

G.3. THIRD READING BYLAW.

G.3.d. Bylaw No. 9779, as amended - To Amend the Auditor General Bylaw No. 4873.

HISTORY

Bylaw 9779 was given first and second readings, as amended, on August 20, 1991.

At the September 10, 1991 meeting of Council, Bylaw 9779, as amended, was postponed to the September 24, 1991 Council meeting. At the September 24, 1991 meeting of Council, Bylaw 9779, as amended, was postponed to the October 8, 1991 Council meeting.

PURPOSE

Bylaw 9779, as amended, clarifies the manner in which reports of the Auditor General are presented.


MOVED Alderman White - Staroszik

That Bylaw 9779, as amended, be tabled sine die.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak, CARRIEDHayter, Mackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik,White.

ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Campbell, Kozak, Mason.

G.1. FIRST READING BYLAWS (Cont'd.).

MOVED Alderman White - Mackenzie

That Bylaws 9775, 9790, 9882, 9894 and 9910 be now read a first time.



Bylaws 9775, 9790, 9882, 9894 and 9910 were read a first time.

MOVED Alderman White - Mackenzie

That Bylaws 9775, 9790, 9882, 9894 and 9910 be now read a second time.



Bylaws 9775, 9790, 9882, 9894 and 9910 were read a second time.

MOVED Alderman White - McKay

That Bylaws 9775, 9790, 9882, 9894 and 9910 be considered for third reading.



MOVED Alderman white - Mackenzie

That Bylaws 9775, 9790, 9882, 9894 and 9910 be now read a third time and finally passed.




Bylaws 9775, 9790, 9882, 9894 and 9910 were read a third time and were finally passed.

G.3. THIRD READING BYLAWS.

Members of Council were requested to consider the following bylaws for third reading in the order, as listed:

G.3.a. Bylaw 9628G.3.e. Bylaw 9859

G.3.a. Bylaw No. 9628 - To Close 68 Avenue between 17Street and 70 Avenue, Southeast Annexation.

HISTORY

The Planning and Development supports this closure.

At the regular meeting of City Council held on December 11, 1990, a Public Hearing was held and the above-referenced bylaw received first and second readings.

The sale of the subject roadway to Maple Ridge Developments Ltd. was approved by the Executive Committee on September 25, 1991.

G.3.e. Bylaw No. 9859 - To Amend the Text of the Land UseBylaw by amending existing Use Class definitions toexclude "Adult Mini-Theatres" in Section 10.3(3) (MajorAmusement Establishment). Section 10.3(3.a) (MinorAmusement Establishment), and Section 10.7(13) (SpectatorEntertainment Establishment), by adding a Use Class,"Adult Mini-Theatres", as Section 10.4(4), by adding anew Section 96 containing regulations for it, by addingrelated regulations in the IH District in Sections430.3(6) and 430.5(2). and by changing Schedule 66A(13)to include parking regulations for the new Use Class.

HISTORY

At the regular meeting of City Council held on September 24, 1991,Bylaw 9859 received first and second readings.


PURPOSE

The purpose of this bylaw is to amend Section 10.3(3). Section 10.3(3a), Section 10.7(13), Section 10.4(4), to add Section 96, Section 430.3(6), Section 430.5(2) and to amend Schedule 66A, Subsection 13, to crete a definition, regulations and parking requirements all for a new Use Class, "Adult Mini-Theatres".

This amendment was brought forward pursuant to City Council's direction.

MOVED Alderman White – Chichak

That Bylaws 9628 and 9859 be now read a third time and finally passed.



Bylaws 9628 and 9859 were read a third time and were finally passed.


MOVED Alderman Mackenzie – Bethel

That Executive Committee Report 96, item 3 be brought forward to be dealt with at this time.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak, CARRIEDHayter, Mackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik.

ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Campbell, Kozak, Mason,White.

D.1. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORT 96.

3. Business Innovation Centre - Request for FinancialSupport


That it considered the above noted item, together with a report prepared by the Finance Department dated August 19, 1991 and heard from Mr. E. Davies, General Manager,Business Innovation Centre and Mr. D.M. Clement, EdmontonEconomic Development Authority.



That the Business Innovation Centre receive $40,000 from the Council Contingency Fund, on the understanding that this amount is. matched by the Province of Alberta, the Edmonton Economic Development Authority, Chamber of Commerce and/or the Edmonton School Board in terms of a reduction in rent or maintenance or other financial means by the end of November 1991.


Alderman Mason entered Council Chambers and left a few minutes later.

MOVED Alderman Chichak – Bethel

That Council concur with the recommendation.

AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Hayter – Mackenzie

That the Business Innovation Centre be advised that the City will no longer continue to fund this project.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak, CARRIED Hayter, Mackenzie, McKay, Paull, Staroszik, White.


RECOMMENDATION AS AMENDED put and declared.



MOVED Alderman McKay – Chichak

That Executive Committee Report 94, item 6 be brought forward to be dealt with at this time.




6. Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation, Option to Lease of Lots6 and 7, Block 5, Plan 1839 T.R.



That it considered the above noted item, together with a report prepared by the Planning & Development Department dated September 51 1991.

YOUR COMMITTEE FURTHER REPORTS:

A. That the following recommendations of theAdministration were considered:

1. That City approve an option for a long term lease of Lots 6 and 7, Block 5, Plan 1839 T.R. to the Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation for the nominal fee of $1.00 on the general terms and conditions as outlined in Enclosure I.

3. That the utilities to the Civic Block beturned off and that the Administration conduct only the basic maintenance procedures necessary to satisfy statutory requirements.

B. That it requested the Administration report back onthe differences between the original proposal(Phase I) and the current proposal at the September24, 1991 City Council Meeting.

C. The following motions were passed:

1. That the Committee refer the matter entirelyto City Council, in Committee of the Whole, with the recommendations.

2. That representatives of the Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation and Ms. H. Hunter be invited to speak to City Council on this matter.

3. That City Council deal with this item at its September 24, 1991 meeting at the time specific of 10:30 a.m.

THIS ITEM WAS REFERRED TO CITY COUNCIL WITHOUT A RECOMMENDATION.


That the Administration's recommendations be accepted subject to the following conditions:

1. That the Edmonton Concert Hall Foundation shall haveassembled $54 Million required for construction not laterthan December 31, 1994.


2. That the City continue to have beneficial use of thePhase II lands until such time as the lands are requiredfor the Phase II construction.

3. That the availability of Phase II lands is subject todemonstration to the satisfaction of City Council thatthe Foundation is prepared top roceed with Phase IIwithin ten years of the opening of Phase I.

4. That the Foundation shall inform the city and existingtenants of the Foundation's need for possession of thePhase I site at least twelve months in advance.

5. That the Foundation explore the possibility of low-costaccess to performances for disadvantaged citizens.

REFERRED

Mr. G. Bremner, Finance Department, answered Council's questions.

MOVED Alderman Hayter – McKay

That this matter be referred back to the Administration (Planning and Development/Finance/Office of the City Solicitor) to prepare a report with comprehensive recommendations based on Council's discussions on the Concert Hall proposal.

The report is to address:

- Enclosure I - 3. Lease rate of $1.00 per annum.- Enclosure II- 5. Full construction amount before

exercising options.- The definition of the word "assembled".- The recognition of Bona fide donors' pledges.- The lease should identify the range of strategies

for access and public use of buildings.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak, CARRIEDHayter, Mackenzie, Mason, McKay, Paull,Staroszik, White.

ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Campbell, Kozak.




Alderman Binder stated the following:


In terms of the Municipal Government Act, I am required to advise that if I had been here, I would not have beenable to vote on Bylaws 9916 and 9918 because of provision of legal services by our firm.

MOVED Alderman Mackenzie - Paull

That Bylaws 9703, 9704 and 9999 be brought forward to be dealt with at this time.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDChichak, Hayter, Mackenzie, Mason, PaullWhite.

ABSENT: Aldermen Campbell, Kozak, McKay, Staroszik.


Members of Council requested the bylaws be dealt with individually.

G.3.b. Bylaw No. 9703 - To Amend the Edmonton Land Use Bylaw inorder to implement proposed amendements to the Old Strathcona Area Redevelopment Plan Bylaw.

RECOMMENDATION: That the report (Enclosure IV) be received as information.

HISTORY

On October 30, 1990, City Council considered the 102/103 Street Corridor Study as presented to the Public Affairs Committee onOctober 23, 19909 and concurred with the following recommendations of that Committee:

“1. That City Council approve the 102/103 CorridorStudy.

2. That City Council approve Design ConceptAlternative IA for development of the Corridor.

3. That City Council approve the financial plan forimplementation of the approved Alternative of the102/103 Street Corridor Study.

4. That a left turn be permitted at 103 Street andSaskatchewan Drive."

This proposed Bylaw was produced in compliance with City Council's directives.

At the regular meeting of City Council held on Tuesday, July 16, 1991, Bylaws 9703 and 9704, being bylaws proposed to implement amendments to the Land use Bylaw and the Old Strathcona Area Redevelopment Plan, received first and second readings. Following the second reading of these bylaws, the following motion was passed:


"That the comments from the Strathcona Centre CommunityLeague, dated July 16, 1991, be forwarded to theAdministration for a report to be submitted to theSeptember 24, 1991 meeting of City Council."

Enclosure IV of the Bylaw is the requested report. TheAdministration recommends no alterations to the proposed bylaws as previously submitted.

At the regular meeting of City Council held on Tuesday, September 10, 1991, City Council rescinded the motion passed on July 16, 1991, and replaced it with the following:

"That the comments from the Strathcona Community League,dated July 16, 1991, be forwarded to the Administrationfor a report to be submitted to the October 22, 1991meeting of City Council."

At the regular meeting of City Council held on Tuesday, September 24,1991, City Council passed a motion to rescind, without customary notice, the motion of September 10, 1991, and Bylaw 9703 was presented for third reading. Third reading was lost on a tie vote.

PURPOSE

This Bylaw is required to implement the Design Concept Alternative 1A approved by City Council on October 30, 1991 for the 102/103 Street Corridor, and the proposed amendments to the Old Strathcona Area Redevelopment Plan.

G.3.c. Bylaw No. 9704 - To Amend the Old Strathcona AreaRedevelopment Plan.

HISTORY

On October 30, 19905 City Council considered the 102/103 Street Corridor Study as presented to the Public Affairs Committee onOctober 23, 19909 and concurred with the following recommendations of that Committee:

“1. That City Council approve the 102/103 CorridorStudy.

2. That City Council approve Design ConceptAlternative 1A for development of the Corridor.

3. That City Council approve the financial plan forimplementation of the approved Alternative of the102/103 Street Corridor Study.

4. That a left turn be permitted at 103 Street andSaskatchewan Drive."


This proposed Bylaw was produced in compliance with City Council's directives.

At the regular meeting of City Council held on Tuesday, July 16, 1991, Bylaws 9703 and 9704, being bylaws proposed to implement amendments to the Land Use Bylaw and the Old Strathcona Area Redevelopment Plan, received first and second readings.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the Bylaw is to amend specific policies and objectives of the Old Strathcona Area Redevelopment Plan and implementrecommendations proposed in the 102/103 Street Corridor Study and the Council recommended Design Concept Alternative 1A.

G.3.f. Bylaw No. 9999 - The Procedures and Committees Bylaw.

HISTORY

At the regular meeting of City Council held on September 24, 1991, the above-referenced bylaw received first and second readings only. At the same meeting, the recommendations, as corrected, were also passed.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this bylaw is to provide rules governing the proceedings of the Council of the City of Edmonton and other Civic Agencies. The report in Enclosure I describes the key changes introduced by this Bylaw.

Members of Council requested the bylaws be split for voting purposes.

Mr. R. Liteplo, Assistant City Solicitor, answered Council's questions.


AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Mackenzie - Hayter

That Bylaw 9703 be amended by deleting all redistrictingsother than the redistricting proposed for the Ritchie Mill site.



Alderman Campbell entered Council Chambers.




MOTION OF ALDERMAN MACKENZIE put and declared.

FOR THE MOTION: Aldermen Bethel, Hayter, Mackenzie, Mason. LOSTOPPOSED: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Binder, Campbell,

Chichak, McKay, Paull, White.ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, Staroszik.

MOVED Alderman Binder – McKay

That Bylaw 9703 be now read a third time and finallypassed.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Binder, Campbell, CARRIEDChichak, McKay, Paull, White.

OPPOSED: Aldermen Bethel, Hayter, Mackenzie, Mason.ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, Staroszik.

MOVED Alderman Binder - McKay


Bylaws 9703 and 9704 were read a third time and were finally passed.

MOVED Alderman Binder - Mackenzie


AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Mackenzie - Chichak

That Section 178. Duties of Executive Committee, (7) be amended as follows:

(7) recommends to Council collective bargaining agreements which the Executive Committee authorizesthe Administration to negotiate, subject to

Council's guidelines, bylaws, policies and budgets.

FOR THE NOTION: Aldermen Mackenzie, Paull, White. LOSTOPPOSED: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder,

Campbell, Chichak, Hayter, Mason, McKay.ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, Staroszik.


AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Paull – White

That Section 159(2) be deleted and renumbered accordingly.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Mason, Paull, LOSTWhite.

OPPOSED: Aldermen Bethel, Binder, Campbell, Chichak,Hayter, Mackenzie, McKay.

ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, Staroszik.

AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Hayter – Binder

That each Standing Committee will determine its own Chair and Vice-Chair.

FOR THE MOTION: Aldermen Binder, Campbell, Hayter, LOSTPaull, White.

OPPOSED: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Chichak,Mackenzie, Mason, McKay.

ABSENT: Aldermen Kozak, Staroszik.



AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Campbell – McKay

That the Chair of the Budget Committee be selectedannually from a vote of Committee members from a list ofthose interested in the position; that the Deputy Chairbe similarly selected; and, that in the absence of both,a Chair be selected by those present.



FOR THE MOTION: Aldermen Campbell, White. LOSTOPPOSED: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder,

Chichak, Mackenzie, McKay, Mason, Paull.ABSENT: Aldermen Hayter, Kozak, Staroszik.

Mayor Reimer vacated the Chair and the Deputy Mayor, Alderman Bethel,assumed the Chair.

Mayor Reimer left the meeting.


AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Mackenzie – Binder

That Bylaw 9999 be amended by adding the words "except the Mayor" in the Membership of Standing Committees After 1992 Election section.

Section 159(2)(b) will now read:

(b) membership will rotate among Councillors, except the Mayor, so that ......

FOR THE MOTION: Aldermen Bethel, Binder, Campbell, CARRIEDChichak, Mackenzie, Mason, McKay,Paull, White.

ABSENT: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Hayter, Kozak,Staroszik.

Mayor Reimer re-entered Council Chambers.

The Deputy Mayor, Alderman Bethel, vacated the Chair and Mayor Reimer assumed the Chair.

AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman McKay - No Seconder

That the Vice Chair of the Budget Committee not be theDeputy Mayor.

NO SECONDER


I would like to thank Alderman Mackenzie and the members of the Committee and the working group because I know allof you spent a great deal of time and a lot of hours sorting through some rather difficult items. I think we will all have to be prepared for the November Councilmeeting in terms of our new procedures and how they work.

So, on behalf of all members on Council, Alderman Mackenzie to you and your Committee and to the staff, a vote of thanks.

Council acknowledged the Procedures and Review Committee.

Alderman Mackenzie stated the following:

If I could just, in fact, thank Alderman McKay, Alderman Campbell, Alderman Chichak and Alderman Bethel, who showed up on most occasions. This has been in the worksfor eighteen months. There is some clean-up still to do. They really stuck with it and I really have to compliment


Mavis Nathoo and Ulli Watkiss, in particular, along with Law and the Planning Department.

It is really the staff who deserves the major vote of thanks. I thank you very much.

Council acknowledged the representatives from the Procedures Review Committee and the Administration.

MOTION ON THIRD READING OF BYLAW 9999 AS AMENDED put and declared.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Binder, CARRIEDCampbell, Chichak, Mackenzie, Mason, McKay,Paull, White.

ABSENT: Aldermen Hayter, Kozak, Staroszik.

Alderman Bethel left the Council Chambers.

Alderman Binder left Council Chambers.

D.1. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORT 95.

4. Laidlaw Application for Waste Facility


That it considered the above noted item together with a report prepared by the Public Works Department dated September 18, 1991.


That the City of Edmonton support the application by Laidlaw Waste Systems Ltd. to develop a materials recovery facility at 2411 - 76 Avenue.

Mr. Liteplo, Assistant City Solicitor, answered Council's questions.

MOVED Alderman Mackenzie – Chichak

That the City of Edmonton support the application by Laidlaw Waste Systems Ltd. to develop a materials recovery facility.

MOVED Alderman McKay - Mayor Reimer

That this matter be referred back to the Administrationfor overall consideration.


Mr. R. Picherack, City Manager, answerered Council's questions.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Alderman McKay. LOSTOPPOSED: Aldermen Campbell, Chichak, Mackenzie,

Mason, Paull, White.ABSENT: Aldermen Bethel, Binder, Hayter, Kozak,

Staroszik.

AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman Campbell – White

And that the report be forwarded to the Board of Health.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Campbell, CARRIEDMackenzie, Mason, McKay, Paull, White.

OPPOSED: Alderman Chichak.ABSENT: Aldermen Bethel, Binder, Hayter, Kozak,

Staroszik.

AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT MOVED Alderman McKay - No Seconder

That the phrase "subject to a successful redistricting" be inserted after the word "facility".

NO SECONDERAlderman Bethel re-entered Council Chambers.

MOTION OF ALDERMAN MACKENZIE AS AMENDED put and declared.

FOR THE MOTION: Aldermen Bethel, Campbell, Chichak, CARRIEDMackenzie, Mason, McKay.

OPPOSED: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Paull, White.ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Hayter, Kozak, Staroszik.


B. ALDERMANIC INQUIRIES/SUGGESTIONS.

Nil.

C. ANSWERS TO INQUIRIES.


D.2. PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT.

Nil.


D.3. UTILITIES AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT.

Nil.

D.4. HOUSE COMMITTEE REPORT.

Nil.

D.5. SPECIAL COMMITTEES REPORT.

Nil.

D.6. TASK FORCES REPORT.

Nil.

E. OTHER REPORTS.

THESE REPORTS WERE DEALT WITH ON PAGES 2516/7.

F. STATUTORY PROTESTS.

Bylaws 9809, 9810, 9877, 9883, 9902, 9903, 9896, 9914, 9917, 9923, 9925, 9916 and 9918 were dealt with on pages 2486-2511.

G.1. FIRST READING BYLAWS.

BYLAWS 9775, 9790, 9882, 9894 and 9910 WERE DEALT WITH ON PAGES 2520-2524.

G.2. SECOND READING BYLAWS.

Nil.

G.3. THIRD READING BYLAWS.

BYLAWS 9628 and 9859 WERE DEALT WITH ON PAGES 2524/5.

Council MinutesOctober 9, 19912537

H.1. NOTICES OF MOTION.

Nil.

H.2. MOTIONS RE: NOTICES.

H.2.a. Alderman Kozak re: Municipal Government Act Regarding Business Revitalization Zone.

Alderman Kozak was absent and this matter was postponed to the next meeting of City Council.

H.2.b. Alderman Kozak re: Waste Management Plans.

Alderman Kozak was absent and this matter was postponed to-the next meeting of City Council.

H.2.c. Alderman Mason re: Standard of Living Above Poverty Line.

Alderman Mason was absent and this matter was postponed the the next meeting of City Council.

H.2.d. Alderman McKay re: Comparison of Strengths and Weaknesses of the Commission Board System vs Executive Committee System.

Alderman McKay requested that this item be postponed to the next regular meeting of City Council.

H.2.e. Alderman Staroszik re: Wildlife Habitats.

Alderman Staroszik was absent and this item was postponed to the next regular meeting of City Council.

H.2.f. Alderman White re: Municipal Planning Commission's Regulations.

MOVED Alderman White – Paull

That the Municipal Planning Commission's regulations, as they pertain to pipeline right-of-way in a NeighbourhoodStructure Plan or an Area Structure Plan, be reviewed by the Utilities and Finance Committee.

FOR THE MOTION: Mayor Reimer, Aldermen Bethel, Campbell, CARRIEDChichak, Mackenzie, McKay, Paull, White.

ABSENT: Aldermen Binder, Hayter, Kozak, Mason,Staroszik.


____________________ _____________________MAYOR CITY CLERK.

The meeting concluded at 3:45 p.m.


Documents

webdocs.edmonton.cawebdocs.edmonton.ca/.../CC/Elected-1989/1991-10-08/C… · Web viewCOUNCIL MEETING NO. 51. TUESDAY OCTOBER 8, 1991. WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 9, 1991. PRESENT: Mayor