3
Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC We Three Kings Author(s): Caroline Atkinson Source: Foreign Policy, No. 128 (Jan. - Feb., 2002), pp. 78-79 Published by: Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3183361 . Accessed: 15/06/2014 23:35 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Foreign Policy. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.34.79.228 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:35:00 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

We Three Kings

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: We Three Kings

Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC

We Three KingsAuthor(s): Caroline AtkinsonSource: Foreign Policy, No. 128 (Jan. - Feb., 2002), pp. 78-79Published by: Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLCStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3183361 .

Accessed: 15/06/2014 23:35

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extendaccess to Foreign Policy.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.228 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:35:00 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 2: We Three Kings

ARGUMENT

We Three Kings

Grappling with a global recession, the world's top central

bankers discover that all political economy is local.

By Caroline Atkinson

s the global economy has headed into what may be its worst crisis in several decades, only one of the world's three most powerful central bankers has

responded decisively to try to stop the bleeding. U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan swung into

action at the first indications of weakness in the U.S. economy, slashing short-term interest rates in Janu-

ary 2001 and following up with an unprecedented series of rate cuts during the rest of the year. Across the

Atlantic, however, European Central Bank (ECB) President Wim Duisenberg was slow to cut rates and cautious when he did so, despite growing evidence of economic malaise in the euro zone. Finally, even Duisenberg's moves seemed sprightly next to Bank of Japan (BoJ) Governor Masaru Hayami's glacial approach to monetary easing.

The easy conclusion is that Greenspan is a more skilled policymaker than either his Euro-

pean or Japanese counterpart. But their differing approaches underscore a more complicated fact: For all the apparent power and undoubted global economic impact of the world's largest central banks, their policies are homegrown and inevitably constrained by local politics and institutions. Dif- ferent individuals at the helms of the ECB and BOJ might be more willing to pursue aggressive monetary policy, but they could not do away alto-

gether with the real constraints facing Duisenberg and, to a lesser extent, Hayami.

The 66-year-old Duisenberg, former president of the central bank of the Netherlands, has faced the daunting task of launching a new regional currency and running a new central bank with membership drawn from 12 disparate nation-states. Building internal consensus and winning the political backing necessary for effective policymaking was never going to be easy. It was made even harder when the eco- nomic environment began to worsen rapidly in 2001 with the euro barely two years old. The weaker

economy suggested a need for easier monetary pol- icy precisely when the still fledgling ECB wanted to shore up its credibility as an inflation fighter. The European monetary authority was also blindsided by the foreign exchange market's persistent vote against the euro, which slid by about 25 percent against the dollar in its first 18 months of existence and has not come close to dollar parity since.

Duisenberg's efforts to forge consensus on inter- est-rate policy have been further complicated by Euro-

Caroline Atkinson is a senior fellow in international economics

at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C., and

a former senior advisor to the U.S. secretary of the treasury.

78 FOREIGN POLICY

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.228 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:35:00 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 3: We Three Kings

LLd

oL

o,

o

0

pean finance ministers calling for looser monetary pol- icy. U.S. politicians, however, have learned that Fed-

bashing doesn't pay. As former U.S. Treasury Secre- tary Lawrence Summers liked to remark, calling for the Fed to lower short-term rates is worse than useless: It has no impact on the Fed's decisions and risks unsettling bond markets and pushing up long-term interest rates. European politicians have taken their time to learn this lesson.

With an explicit focus on fighting inflation, the ECB tends to interpret its mandate more narrowly than does the Federal Reserve, which conducts monetary policy "in pursuit of full employment and stable prices." But in the pre-ECB days, central bank chiefs in Europe often issued pronounce- ments about curbing fiscal deficits and restraining wage demands, implicitly linking such policies to their own will- ingness to adjust monetary policy. Similarly, the ECB has tried to pressure governments to help strengthen the regional economy, calling for struc- tural reforms addressing fiscal policy, labor markets, and pension systems. But the impact of such calls has been inevitably diffused when aimed at 12 different countries and governments. Until the ECB establishes a more con- vincing track record of its own, it will have difficulty persuading national-level economic policymakers to follow its advice.

The troubling story in Japan is less explicable. Established in 1882, the BOJ is hardly a new institution, and the 76-year-old Hayami is a longtime BOJ staffer. However, the institution only recently gained full, formal independence from the previ- ously all-powerful Japanese Ministry of Finance (MOF). Hayami's desire to safeguard that independence partly explains his zeal in opposing a return to one of the most visi- ble signs of central bank subservience-direct financing of the government deficit. He has also rejected political pressure to adopt a (positive)

Wim Duisenberg, Masaru Hayami, and

Alan Greenspan

inflation target and undermined MOF attempts to drive down the value of the yen to support export growth. The BoJ regularly mops up the extra cash

created by the MOF's currency inter- ventions, thereby keeping its own monetary strategy intact.

Certainly, establishing a central bank's bona fides as an independent institution is important, and being a credible inflation fighter is part of that. But Japan's far-from-normal circum- stances-falling prices, continued eco- nomic slump, and a perilously weak financial system--call for imaginative rather than traditional policymaking. With interest rates already close to zero, monetary easing must involve extraor- dinary measures, such as buying more government debt, selling yen to put money into the economy, and making a clear commitment to turn deflation into (low) inflation. In this context, Hayami's warning in the fall of 2001 about potential inflationary dangers struck a particularly bizarre note. Ironically, the failure of monetary policy to address Japan's debilitating deflation has under- mined the case for much-needed struc- tural reforms. Politicians are reluctant to implement new policies that, while essential for long-term health, could strike a dangerous short-term blow to an already tottering economy.

So is the global economy hostage to local constraints that fetter the actions of national and regional monetary powers? In Europe, it may take time for the ECB to build the confidence and leadership needed to make decisive monetary policy. It is bad luck that the global slowdown has coincided with (and been exacerbated by) the institu- tion's growing pains. But no one doubts that the European economy will eventually pick up. In Japan, by

contrast, the consequences of policy failures are dire. Bold, concerted action by political and mon- etary leaders is needed for an economy already trapped in a decade-long slump, but the prospects for change seem worryingly dim. II

JANUARY I FEBRUARY 2002 79

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.228 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:35:00 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions