Upload
vannhu
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
A/V Sponsored By:
We can help you prevent 50% of your excavation damages.
Visit Opvantek at booth 726
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Participating Organizations
2014 Guide Pilot Initiative
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Presentation Panel
Eric S. Barden, PS – Spicer Group Inc.
Bruce Campbell – MISS Dig Systems Inc
Dirk Dunham – Consumers Energy
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
What is MUCC GUIDE?
Michigan Utility Coordination Committee
Geospatial Utility Infrastructure Data Exchange
Creates a mature and sustainable approach to data collection, management and dissemination
of 3D geospatial data on underground utility infrastructure by capturing accurate XYZinformation at the time of installation and
organizing it in a spatial database format for secure, highly accessible use by downstream
stakeholders.
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Goals
Create a central repository where all survey data can be submitted, stored, managed and shared.
Provide user access to the central repository in order to allow stakeholders access to the geospatial utility information
Focus the acquisition of accurate geospatial utility information solely on underground utilities
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Goals
Identify challenges associated with acquiring
accurate spatial data during installation
Identify short and long-term benefits of
acquiring accurate spatial data
Identify the technical considerations for
acquiring accurate spatial data
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Anticipated Benefits
Increased efficiency in project coordination during
design
Better project decision making
Improved project communication
Utilization of asset data through it’s life cycle
Reduce construction delays and user delays
Improve public safety and reduce owner & utility
company risk
Reduce costly utility conflicts during construction
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Anticipated Benefits
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Considerations
What location data
is important to capture?
X and Y
X, Y and Z
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Considerations
Who Collects the Geospatial Data?
• Utility Company
• Utility Contractor
• MDOT
• Professional Surveyor
• Combination of above
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
What will the standards include?
• Level of accuracy
• Attribution
• Data format
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Value of Additional Info
• Site conditions
• Installation methods
• Personnel involved
• How much is too much?
• Etc.
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Workflow Overview
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Spatial Data Collection
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Accurate Data Collection
Relative to the National Spatial Reference
System
• Northing & Easting (MISPC, International Feet)
• Elevation (NAVD’88 Datum, International Feet)
Top of the pipe / conduit
Survey grade accuracy
• H - 5cm (0.16 feet) x V - 10cm (0.33 feet)
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Required Observations
Transmission / distribution main lines Starting / ending points
100’ Interval
Any deviation in alignment (3D)
Any changes in facility characteristics
Start / end points for vaults
Multi-duct installations, observations shall be taken from
the top center of the duct bank. Recording duct bank
size
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Required Observations
Appurtenances installed concurrently with new mains
• Tap-in location at main and ROW line points
New appurtenances from existing mains
• Tap-in at main and ROW line points for:
• Gas - 2 inches and greater
• Telephone - Fiber or copper cables 25 pair and greater
• Electric - Secondary and higher voltage lines
*Appurtenances, with respect to this pilot, are defined as service leads and stubs.
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Required Observations
Directional drilling
• Actual observations at start and end
• Intermediate points to provide elevation curve data
• Intermediate points not directly accessible -Derive from actual ground elevation minus boring head depth readout
Facilities installed in existing conduit
• Installation method identified as “insertion”
• Necessity dependent on the existing conduit’s location relative to the existing roadway infrastructure
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
File Specifications
• .xls
• .xlsx
• .shp
• .gdb
• .txt
• .csv
Acceptable formats:
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Pilot Projects (7)
• Data collection
• Provide MDOT with
data collected
• Additional costs
• Personnel impacts
• Equipment
procurement
• Required time
to process data
• Feedback on
requirements
• Best practices
• Positive impacts
to utilities
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Consumers Energy
Installation of 4,021' of 6" plastic gas main,
70' of 2" plastic gas line in Isabella County
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Consumers Energy
1,340' of 6" gas distribution main relocation in
Shiawassee County
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Consumers Energy
4,398' of 8" steel high pressure gas main installation in
Eaton County
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
AT&T
2 Miles of 1.25" of HDPE (fiber optic) installation in
Gladwin County
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
AT&T
125' of 1.25" HDPE (fiber optic) installation in
Washtenaw County
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
AT&T
Communication duct bank relocation boring in Oakland
County (removed)
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
DTE Energy
100' of 12" high pressure gas main relocation in Wayne
County
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
DTE Energy
2.96 Miles of gas main renewal. 3"and 4" plastic main
inserted into existing 6" cast iron mains in Wayne County.
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Guide Key Findings
Further development of the GUIDE Requirements Document
Potential for significant roadway agency impacts
Training requirements
Survey staff proximity to projects
Coordination of surveying efforts
Development of contract specific language
Lack of supporting utility conflict cost data
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Data Acquisitions Lessons Learned
Data delivery standards
Coordination of data collection proved
challenging
Utility company contract provisions for
GUIDE
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Costs
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Overall Cost Benefit
Comparing Guide Costs to SUE
University of Purdue: SUE study 1999
71 projects studied
4 states
$4.62 saved for every dollar spent
Average 0.5% of construction cost
University of Toronto: SUE study 2006
9 projects studied
$2.05 - $6.59 for every dollar spent
Average 1.6% of construction cost
GUIDE resulted in cost of .75%-2% of construction cost
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Pilot
• Set-up a draft database
• Enterprise database assembly
• Document pilot outcomes
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Long term goals, pending pilot results
• Apply to all permitted
underground utilities
• Apply to MDOT
projects where new
municipal utilities are
installed and where
utilities (all) are
exposed
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Access
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
What’s Next?Phase 2
Mobile App Development
Web portal for submitting GUIDE data
AGOL geospatial database
• Permissions, rules, users, secured access
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
What’s Next?Phase 2
Comprehensive standards development
Office to field to submittal manual development
2017 Implementation
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Questions?
Final Pilot Reporthttp://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdot/GUIDE2014_510082_7.pdf
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
See You Next Year
Rosen Shingle Creek, Orlando, Florida
March 14-16, 2017
March 8-10, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada
Please complete the survey