7/28/2019 Wayang Kulit Elections

1/2

Wayang kulit elections Ravinder SinghJULY 21, 2013

JULY 21 The game plan was simple. Malaysia is supposed to be a democratic country. Thatwas the foundation on which it was born. The Federal Constitution is there to prove it.

On the other hand, after the time of Tunku Abdul Rahman, the Umno-dominated Alliance

(changed to Barisan Nasional later) felt that it should remain in power all the time, for reasons

best known to it.

However, this had to be done in a democratic way to show the world that democracy was alive.

A simple way to do this was to move the goalposts from election to election. A game plan was

mooted to do this constitutionally. Using its two-thirds majority in Parliament, which is needed to

amend the very same constitution, the plan was put into action. First, the 15 per cent difference

allowed in the number of voters in the different constituencies was changed to 50 per cent.

A further amendment was made some years later which removed the 50 per cent figure and left

only the words approximately equal for the Election Commission to interpret as it chose fit. This

resulted in some constituencies becoming umpteen times bigger than others. It was no co-

incidence that these huge constituencies were pro-opposition voters.

This game of changing the goalposts had to be further refined to make it easier to accurately

identify the sentiments of small pockets of voters. This was done by changing the vote-counting

system. Instead of taking all the marked ballots to a central counting station, where a different

group of election workers would do the counting, the counting was now to be done in the very

room that the ballots were cast, by the same election workers.

This ballot counting in the balloting rooms was a very well disguised operation for spying on the

voters. People were fooled into accepting this method of vote counting by telling them that this

way the results would be known several hours earlier than before. People being anxious to know

the results as soon as possible, did not raise an eyebrow and see the mischief behind the move.

The mischief was that the EC now had very detailed information about how the voters in each

and every stream, numbering from 200 to 600 or so, had voted. Now, knowing the addresses of

these voters and how a majority in each stream had voted, the pencils were out drawing lines

around these addresses, either grouping them on the pro-government side or the pro-opposition

side. Thus electoral boundaries began zigzagging in ways defying logic and unseen before.

When the question of gerrymandering was raised, and the EC asked to explain the huge disparity

in electoral constituencies despite the Constitution clearly saying that the number of voters in

them must be approximately equal, the EC had the gall to say that the Constitution had been

followed in drawing up the boundaries.

1

7/28/2019 Wayang Kulit Elections

2/2

It must also be noted that the EC is actually a department in the Prime Ministers Department and

not an Election Commission that is independent. It is under the direction of the PM. All re-

delineation reports must first be handed to the PM for his approval. If the EC were independent,

these reports should go straight to Parliament without the PM seeing them, let alone approving

them first.

To hoodwink the world that the elections department was an independent body, it had to be

officially called a Commission. Maybe by a slip of the tongue, one of the commissioners recently

confirmed that the Commission was not independent when he said that the commissions

proposal to draw up rules for a caretaker government after dissolution of Parliament was shot

down by a government ministry. The chairman of the Commission has not denied this.

With calls for the Commission to use indelible ink growing louder, it chose to placate the people

by getting some coloured liquid, which a Minister confirmed was food colouring, for which over

RM7 million was paid.

If any members of the Commission have any conscience, they should resign. Would the member

who publicly stated that the Commission was stopped from making rules for a caretaker

government please lead the way. Have you got anything to lose by resigning?

Your chairman and his deputy never stop claiming that the EC is truly and honestly an

independent body. If so, why did the Commission even have to inform the government of its

intention to make rules for a caretaker government? Can you honestly continue serving the

Commission which loudly claims to be independent but which is NOT independent of government

control as you have publicly acknowledged? Your integrity is at stake.

Times have changed. Dr Ms philosophy of governance that if you tell a lie and repeat it often

enough people will believe it is the truth, no longer works.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the

views of The Malay Mail Online.

- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/what-you-think/article/wayang-kulit-elections-ravinder-singh#sthash.VWHbNVem.dpuf

2