Watson Industrial Park - CivicLivecityofchino.hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10382578/… · Watson Industrial Park Energy Analysis 09646-03 Energy Analysis Report

Watson Industrial Park ENERGY ANALYSIS CITY OF CHINO

PREPARED BY: Haseeb Qureshi, MES [email protected] (949) 660-1994 x217 Stephen Abille [email protected] (949) 660-1994 x234 APRIL 27, 2015 09646-03 Energy Analysis Report

Watson Industrial Park Energy Analysis

09646-03 Energy Analysis Report i

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... I APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................................ II LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. II LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................ III 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Operational-Source Mitigation Measures .................................................................................... 2

2 EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Electricity ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Natural Gas ................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Transportation Energy Resources ............................................................................................... 10

3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Federal Regulations..................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 California Regulations ................................................................................................................. 13

4 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEAURES ............................................. 15 4.1 Evaluation Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Construction Energy Demands ................................................................................................... 15 4.4 Operational Energy Demands ..................................................................................................... 27 4.5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 32 4.6 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 33

5 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 35 6 CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................................................ 38


09646-03 Energy Analysis Report ii

APPENDICES APPENDIX 3.1: CALEEMOD EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 3.2: EMFAC 2014 MODEL OUTPUTS

LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1-A: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ................................................................................................ 4 EXHIBIT 3-A: PORT OF LOS ANGELES/PORT OF LONG BEACH CONTAINER COUNTS ............................. 13

LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECTRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2013) .................................................... 6 TABLE 2-2: SCE 2013 POWER CONTENT MIX ........................................................................................ 8 TABLE 4-1: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION POWER COST ........................................................................... 16 TABLE 4-2: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE ................................................................. 16 TABLE 4-3A: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ..................................... 17 TABLE 4-3B: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ...................................... 18 TABLE 4-3C: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ...................................... 19 TABLE 4-4A: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES........................................... 21 TABLE 4-4B: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ........................................... 22 TABLE 4-5: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES (MHD TRUCKS)...................... 24 TABLE 4-6: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES (HHD TRUCKS) ...................... 24 TABLE 4-7: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES (HHD TRUCKS) ...................... 25 TABLE 4-8: PROJECT-GENERATED PASSENGER CAR TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION ................ 28 TABLE 4-9: PROJECT-GENERATED LHD TRUCK TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION ....................... 28 TABLE 4-10: PROJECT-GENERATED MHD TRUCK TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION .................... 29 TABLE 4-11: PROJECT-GENERATED HHD TRUCK TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION ..................... 29 TABLE 4-12: PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION (ALL VEHICLES) ................ 29 TABLE 4-13: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY (WITHOUT MITIGATION)30 TABLE 4-14: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY (WITH MITIGATION) ..... 31


09646-03 Energy Analysis Report iii

LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS

(1) Reference AQIA Air Quality Impact Analysis ARB Air Resources Board CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model CARB California Air Resources Board CEC California Energy Commission CPUC California Public Utilities Commission EVs Electric Vehicles EMFAC Emissions Factor FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission GPA General Plan Amendment GWh Gigawatt Hour HHD Heavy-Heavy Duty ISO Independent Service Operator ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers LHD Light-Heavy Duty MHD Medium-Heavy Duty MPG Miles Per Gallon MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Watson Industrial Park SCE Southern California Edison SoCalGas Southern California Gas SF Square Feet TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled

This page intentionally left blank


09646-03 Energy Analysis Report 1

1 INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of the air energy analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for the proposed Watson Industrial Park Development (TTM No. 36785) (referred to as “Project”). The purpose of this report is to ensure that energy implications are considered by the City of Chino, as the lead agency, and to quantify anticipated energy usage associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project, determine if the usage amounts are efficient, typical, or wasteful for the land use type, and to emphasize avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy.

1.1 SITE LOCATION

The proposed Project is located south of Merrill Avenue and between Van Vliet Avenue (existing Baker Avenue) and Carpenter Avenue in the City of Chino as shown on Exhibit 1-A. The Chino Airport is located approximately one-half mile to the west, and the Interstate 15 (I-15) Freeway is located roughly three miles east of the Project site.

1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Project is proposed to consist of a total of 3,872,000 square feet (sf) of high-cube warehouse / warehousing use as shown on Exhibit 1-B. However, for the purposes of this study, the Project is assumed to consist of 3,889,900 square feet sf of high-cube warehouse / warehousing use with eight independent buildings ranging in size from 303,800 sf to 757,900 sf in an effort to conduct a conservative analysis For analytical purposes, and since a specific tenants are unknown at this time, it is assumed that 25% of the Project’s total building square footage could be used for cold storage (e.g., refrigerated uses). The Project is proposed to be developed in three phases as listed below:

• Phase 1 (2016): 1,221,000 sf high-cube warehouse/distribution center

• Phase 2 (2017): 1,473,900 sf high-cube warehouse/distribution center for a total of up to 2,694,900 sf.

• Phase 3 (2018): 1,195,000 sf high-cube warehouse/distribution center for a total of up to 3,889,900 sf at Buildout.

A Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) and General Plan Amendment (GPA) are proposed to amend The Preserve Specific Plan and City of Chino General Plan Land Use Element as it applies to the easternmost portions of the +/- 211.9 gross-acre (189.1 net-acre) Project site by changing the “Agriculture” land use designation to “Light Industrial.” The western portions of the Project site are already designated by The Preserve Specific Plan and the City of Chino General Plan for “Light Industrial” land uses, and no changes are proposed to this existing designation.

1.3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

For new development such as that proposed by the Watson Industrial Park Development, compliance with California Building Standards Code Title 24 energy efficiency requirements (CalGreen), combined with the mitigation measures that are recommended by the Watson



Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis, Greenhouse Gas Analysis, and Health Risk Assessment, are considered demonstrable evidence of efficient use of energy. As discussed below, the Project would provide for, and promote, energy efficiencies beyond those required under other applicable federal and State of California standards and regulations, and in so doing would meet or exceed all California Building Standards Code Title 24 standards. Moreover, energy consumed by the Project’s operation is calculated to be comparable to, or less than, energy consumed by other industrial warehouse uses of similar scale and intensity that are constructed and operating in California. On this basis, the Project would not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. Further, the Project would not cause or result in the need for additional energy producing facilities or energy delivery systems.

1.4 OPERATIONAL-SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURES

The following list of mitigation measures identified in the project’s Air Quality Impact Analysis and Greenhouse Gas Analysis would act to further reduce to the Project’s natural gas, electricity, and fuel demand:

MM AQ-3

To reduce water consumption and the air pollutant emissions associated with energy-usage required to extract, treat, and distribute water supplies, the Project will be designed to comply with the mandatory reductions in indoor water usage contained in the incumbent CalGreen Code (1) and any mandated reduction in outdoor water usage contained in the City’s water efficient landscape requirements. Additionally, the Project shall implement the following:

• Landscaping palette emphasizing drought tolerant plants;

• Use of water-efficient irrigation techniques;

• U.S. EPA Certified WaterSense labeled or equivalent faucets, high-efficiency toilets (HETs), and water-conserving shower heads.

MM AQ-4

The Project will reduce vehicle miles traveled and associated exhaust emissions by implementing the following measures:

• There shall be preferential parking for carpoolers and vanpools.

• The applicant shall provide a minimum of two electric vehicle charging stations per building on-site.

MM AQ-5

Mandatory Compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 15.45: In order to reduce air pollutant emissions, inclusive of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and promote sustainability through conservation of energy and other natural resources, the Project shall comply with applicable provisions of Chino Municipal Code Chapter 15.45 – Climate Action Plan Implementation. Development proposals within the Project site shall conform to Climate Action Plan Implementation Section 15.45.070 Option 1–“Exceed by 3% the mandatory California Energy



Code Title 24, Part 6 standards, in effect at the time of development application submittal for discretionary review.”

Verification of increased energy efficiencies shall be shall be documented in Title 24 Compliance Reports provided by the Applicant, and reviewed and approved by the City prior to the issuance of building permits.

MM AQ-6

The project Applicant shall encourage its tenants to use alternative-fueled vehicles such as compressed natural gas vehicles, electric vehicles or other alternative fuels by providing publicly available information from the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Air Resources Board (CARB), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on alternative fuel technologies.

MM AQ-7

The project Applicant shall make its tenants aware of the funding opportunities, such as Carl Moyer, and other similar funding opportunities, by providing applicable literature on such funding opportunities as available from the CARB. The Carl Moyer Program provides grant funding for cleaner-than-required engines and equipment. Grants are administered by local air districts in an effort to achieving reductions in emissions of key pollutants which are necessary for California to meet its clean air commitments under regulatory requirements.

MM AQ-8

The project shall incorporate light colored concrete (light grey) on truck drive aisles and truck courts into the final design of the project.

MM AQ-9

The project shall incorporate light colored roof materials into the final design of the project.

MM AQ-10

The project shall have mechanical air changes at a rate of one change per hour instead of traditional HVAC heating and cooling in the warehouse areas of the buildings.



EXHIBIT 1-A: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN



2 EXISTING CONDITIONS

This section provides an overview of the existing energy conditions in the Project area and region.

2.1 OVERVIEW

California’s estimated annual energy use as of 2013 included:

• Approximately 296,628 gigawatt hours of electricity;(2)

• Approximately 12,767 million therms natural gas (approximately 3.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day); and

• Approximately 18 billion gallons of gasoline. (3)

As of 2012, energy use in California by demand sector was:

• Approximately 38.5 percent transportation;

• Approximately 22.8 percent industrial;

• Approximately 19.3 percent residential; and

• Approximately 19.4 percent commercial. (4)

California's massive electricity in-state generation system generates more than 200,000 gigawatt-hours each year and is transported over the state's 32,000 miles of transmission lines. In 2013, California produced close to 70% of the electricity it uses; the rest was imported from the Pacific Northwest (12%) and the U.S. Southwest (21%). Natural gas is the main source for electricity generation at 45% of the total in-state electric generation system power as shown in Table 2-1.



TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECTRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2013)

Fuel Type

California In-State

Generation (GWh)

Percent of California In-

State Generation

Northwest Imports (GWh)

Southwest Imports (GWh)

California Power Mix

(GWh)

Percent California

Power Mix

Coal 1,018 0.51% 812 21,363 23,193 7.82%

Large Hydro 20,754 10.39% 96 2,159 23,009 7.76%

Natural Gas 120,863 60.50% 1,241 9,319 131,423 44.31%

Nuclear 17,860 8.94% 0 8,357 26,217 8.84%

Oil 38 0.02% 0 0 38 0.01%

Other 14 0.01% 0 0 14 0.00%

Renewables 39,236 19.64% 13,187 3,256 55,679 18.77%

Biomass 6,423 3.21% 1,485 21 7,929 2.67%

Geothermal 12,485 6.25% 212 495 13,192 4.45%

Small Hydro 3,343 1.67% 470 0 3,813 1.29%

Solar 4,291 2.15% 58 1,040 5,389 1.82%

Wind 12,694 6.35% 10,962 1,700 25,356 8.55%

Unspecified Sources of Power

N/A N/A 19,750 17,305 37,055 12.49%

Total 199,783 100.00% 35,086 61,759 296,628 100.00% Source: http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/total_system_power.html

A summary of, and context for energy consumption and energy demands within the State is presented in “U.S. Energy Information Administration, California State Profile and Energy Estimates, Quick Facts” excerpted below:

• Excluding federal offshore areas, California ranked third in the nation in crude oil production in 2013, despite an overall decline in production rates since the mid-1980s.

• California also ranked third in the nation in refining capacity as of January 2013, with a combined capacity of almost 2 million barrels per calendar day from its 18 operable refineries.

• In 2011, California’s per capita energy consumption ranked 47th in the nation; the state’s low use of energy was due in part to its mild climate and its energy efficiency programs.

• In 2013, California ranked fourth in the nation in conventional hydroelectric generation, second in net electricity generation from other renewable energy resources, and first as a producer of electricity from geothermal energy.

• In 2013, California ranked 15th in net electricity generation from nuclear power after one of its two nuclear plants was taken out of service in January 2012; as of June 2013, operations permanently ceased at that plant, the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

• Average site electricity consumption in California homes is among the lowest in the nation (6.9 megawatt hours per year), according to EIA’s Residential Energy Consumption Survey. (5)

As indicated above, California is one of the nation’s leading energy-producing states, and California per capita energy use is among the nation’s most efficient. Given the nature of the proposed Project being an industrial development, the remainder of this discussion will focus



on the three sources of energy that are most relevant to the project—namely, electricity and natural gas for industrial uses, and transportation fuel for vehicle trips associated with industrial uses planned for the Project.

2.2 ELECTRICITY

The Southern California region’s electricity reliability has been of concern for the past several years due to the planned retirement of aging facilities that depend upon once-through cooling technologies, as well as the June 2013 retirement of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (San Onofre). While the once-through cooling phase-out has been ongoing since the May 2010 adoption of the State Water Resources Control Board’s oncethrough cooling policy, the retirement of San Onofre complicated the situation. California ISO studies had revealed the extent to which the Los Angeles Basin and San Diego region were vulnerable to low-voltage and post-transient voltage instability concerns. A preliminary plan to address these issues was detailed in the 2013 IEPR after a collaborative process with other energy agencies, utilities, and air districts. If the resource development outlined in the preliminary plan continues as detailed, reliability in Southern California would likely be assured; however, tight resource margins have led energy agencies and the ARB to develop a contingency plan. This contingency plan was discussed at a public workshop in Los Angeles on August 20, 2014, and is detailed within this Section (6).

Electricity would be provided to the Project by Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE provides electric power to more than 14 million persons in 15 counties and in 180 incorporated cities, within a service area encompassing approximately 50,000 square miles. SCE derives electricity from varied energy resources including: fossil fuels, hydroelectric generators, nuclear power plants, geothermal power plants, solar power generation, and wind farms. SCE also purchases from independent power producers and utilities, including out-of-state suppliers. (7)

California’s electricity industry is an organization of traditional utilities, private generating companies, and state agencies, each with a variety of roles and responsibilities to ensure that electrical power is provided to consumers. The California Independent Service Operator (“ISO”) is a nonprofit public benefit corporation, and is the impartial operator of the State’s wholesale power grid and is charged with maintaining grid reliability, and to direct uninterrupted electrical energy supplies to California residential and commercial users. While utilities [such as SCE] still own transmission assets, the ISO routes electrical power along these assets, maximizing the use of the transmission system and its power generation resources. The ISO matches buyers and sellers of electricity to ensure that sufficient power is available to meet demand. To these ends, every five minutes the ISO forecasts electrical demands, accounts for operating reserves, and assigns the lowest cost power plant unit to meet demands while ensuring adequate system transmission capacities and capabilities. (8)

Part of the ISO’s charge is to plan and coordinate grid enhancements to ensure that electrical power is provided to California consumers. To this end, transmission owners (investor-owned utilities such as SCE) file annual transmission expansion/modification plans to accommodate the State’s growing electrical needs. The ISO reviews and either approves or denies the proposed additions. In addition, and perhaps most importantly, the ISO works with other areas



in the western United States electrical grid to ensure that adequate power supplies are available to the State. In this manner, continuing reliable and affordable electrical power is assured to existing and new consumers throughout the State.

Table 2-2 identifies SCE’s specific proportional shares of electricity sources in 2013. As indicated in Table 2-2, shows the 2013 SCE Power Mix has renewable energy at 22% of the overall energy resources. Geothermal is remaining steady at 9%, same as in 2012 and 2011. Wind power is at 10%, growing from 8% in 2012 and 7% in 2011. Large hydro is at 4%, where it was in 2012, having fallen from 7% in 2011. Biomass and waste as well as solar energy have remained steady at 1%. Coal is at 6%, dropping slightly from 7% in 2012, and 8% in 2011. Natural gas is at 28%, increasing from 21% in 2012.

TABLE 2-2: SCE 2013 POWER CONTENT MIX

Energy Resources 2013 SCE Power Mix Eligible Renewable 22%

Biomass & waste 1% Geothermal 9%

Small Hydroelectric 1% Solar 1% Wind 10%

Coal 6% Large Hydroelectric 4% Natural Gas 28% Nuclear 6% Other 0% Unspecified Sources of power* 34% Total 100%

* "Unspecified sources of power" means electricity from transactions that are not traceable to specific generation sources

2.3 NATURAL GAS

Natural gas would be provided to the Project by The Gas Company (Southern California Gas, SoCalGas). The following summary of natural gas resources and service providers, delivery systems, and associated regulation is excerpted from information provided by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).

“The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) regulates natural gas utility service for approximately 10.8 million customers that receive natural gas from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Gas (SoCalGas), San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), Southwest Gas, and several smaller natural gas utilities. The CPUC also regulates independent storage operators Lodi Gas Storage, Wild Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage and Gill Ranch Storage.



The vast majority of California’s natural gas customers are residential and small commercial customers, referred to as “core” customers, who accounted for approximately 32% of the natural gas delivered by California utilities in 2012. Large consumers, like electric generators and industrial customers, referred to as “noncore” customers, accounted for approximately 68% of the natural gas delivered by California utilities in 2012.

The PUC regulates the California utilities’ natural gas rates and natural gas services, including in-state transportation over the utilities’ transmission and distribution pipeline systems, storage, procurement, metering and billing. Most of the natural gas used in California comes from out-of-state natural gas basins. In 2012, California customers received 35% of their natural gas supply from basins located in the Southwest, 16% from Canada, 40% from the Rocky Mountains, and 9% from basins located within California. California gas utilities may soon also begin receiving biogas into their pipeline systems.

Natural gas from out-of-state production basins is delivered into California via the interstate natural gas pipeline system. The major interstate pipelines that deliver out-of-state natural gas to California consumers are the Gas Transmission Northwest Pipeline, Kern River Pipeline, Transwestern Pipeline, El Paso Pipeline, the Ruby Pipeline, Questar Southern Trails and Mojave Pipeline. Another pipeline, the North Baja – Baja Norte Pipeline, takes gas off the El Paso Pipeline at the California/Arizona border, and delivers that gas through California into Mexico. While the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulates the transportation of natural gas on the interstate pipelines, the PUC often participates in FERC regulatory proceedings to represent the interests of California natural gas consumers.

Most of the natural gas transported via the interstate pipelines, as well as some of the California-produced natural gas, is delivered into the PG&E and SoCalGas intrastate natural gas transmission pipeline systems (commonly referred to as California’s “backbone” natural gas pipeline system). Natural gas on the utilities’ backbone pipeline systems is then delivered into the local transmission and distribution pipeline systems, or to natural gas storage fields. Some large noncore customers take natural gas directly off the high pressure backbone pipeline systems, while core customers and other noncore customers take natural gas off the utilities’ distribution pipeline systems. The PUC has regulatory jurisdiction over 150,000 miles of utility-owned natural gas pipelines, which transported 82% of the total amount of natural gas delivered to California’s gas consumers in 2012.

SDG&E and Southwest Gas’ southern division are wholesale customers of SoCalGas, and currently receive all of their natural gas from the SoCalGas system (Southwest Gas also provides natural gas distribution service in the Lake Tahoe area). Some other municipal wholesale customers are the cities of Palo Alto, Long Beach, and Vernon, which are not regulated by the CPUC.

Some of the natural gas delivered to California customers may be delivered directly to them without being transported over the regulated utility systems. For example, the



Kern River/Mojave pipeline system can deliver natural gas directly to some large customers, “bypassing” the utilities’ systems. Much of California-produced natural gas is also delivered directly to large consumers.

PG&E and SoCalGas own and operate several natural gas storage fields that are located in northern and southern California. These storage fields, and four independently owned storage utilities – Lodi Gas Storage, Wild Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage, and Gill Ranch Storage – help meet peak seasonal natural gas demand and allow California natural gas customers to secure natural gas supplies more efficiently. (A portion of the Gill Ranch facility is owned by PG&E).

California’s regulated utilities do not own any natural gas production facilities. All of the natural gas sold by these utilities must be purchased from suppliers and/or marketers. The price of natural gas sold by suppliers and marketers was deregulated by the FERC in the mid-1980’s and is determined by “market forces.” However, the PUC decides whether California’s utilities have taken reasonable steps in order to minimize the cost of natural gas purchased on behalf of their core customers.” (9)

As indicated in the preceding discussions, natural gas is available from a variety of in-state and out-of-state sources and is provided throughout the state in response to market supply and demand. Complementing available natural gas resources, biogas may soon be available via existing delivery systems, thereby increasing the availability and reliability of resources in total. The PUC oversees utility purchases and transmission of natural gas to ensure reliable and affordable natural gas deliveries to existing and new consumers throughout the State.

2.4 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY RESOURCES

The Project would attract additional vehicle trips with resulting consumption of energy resources, predominantly gasoline. As of 2012, there are more than 27 million registered vehicles in California, and those vehicles (as noted previously) consume an estimated 18 billion gallons of fuel each year. Gasoline (and other vehicle fuels) are commercially-provided commodities, and would be available to the Project patrons and employees via commercial outlets.

California’s on-road transportation system includes 170,000 miles of highways and major roadways, more than 26 million passenger vehicles and light trucks, and almost 1 million medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. The most recent data available (2012) shows the transportation sector emits 36 percent of the total greenhouse gases in the state and about 83 percent of smog-forming oxides of nitrogen (NOx ). While gasoline consumption has been declining since 2008 it is still by far the dominant fuel. Petroleum comprises about 92 percent of all transportation energy use, excluding fuel consumed for aviation and most marine vessels. Nearly 18 billion gallons of on-highway fuel are burned each year, including 14.5 billion gallons of gasoline (including ethanol) and 3.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel (including biodiesel and renewable diesel). In 2013, Californians also used 174 million therms of natural gas as a transportation fuel, or the equivalent of 142 million gallons of gasoline, and 841,345 megawatt hours of electricity for transportation, or about the equivalent of 25 million gallons of gasoline.



For 2013, combined alternative fuel use in California was slightly more than 7 percent of total transportation fuel use.



3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND

Federal and state agencies regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs. On the federal level, the United States Department of Transportation, the United States Department of Energy, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency are three federal agencies with substantial influence over energy policies and programs. On the state level, the PUC and the California Energy Commissions (CEC) are two agencies with authority over different aspects of energy. Relevant federal and state energy-related laws and plans are summarized below. Project consistency with applicable federal and state regulations is also presented in italicized text.

3.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS

Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA)

The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) promoted the development of inter-modal transportation systems to maximize mobility as well as address national and local interests in air quality and energy. ISTEA contained factors that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) were to address in developing transportation plans and programs, including some energy-related factors. To meet the new ISTEA requirements, MPOs adopted explicit policies defining the social, economic, energy, and environmental values guiding transportation decisions. Transportation and access to the Project site is provided primarily by the local and regional roadway systems. The Project would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct intermodal transportation plans or projects that may be realized pursuant to the ISTEA because SANBAG is not planning for intermodal facilities on or through the Project site.

The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21)

The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) was signed into law in 1998 and builds upon the initiatives established in the ISTEA legislation, discussed above. TEA-21 authorizes highway, highway safety, transit, and other efficient surface transportation programs. TEA-21 continues the program structure established for highways and transit under ISTEA, such as flexibility in the use of funds, emphasis on measures to improve the environment, and focus on a strong planning process as the foundation of good transportation decisions. TEA-21 also provides for investment in research and its application to maximize the performance of the transportation system through, for example, deployment of Intelligent Transportation Systems, to help improve operations and management of transportation systems and vehicle safety. The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access, acts to reduce vehicle miles traveled, takes advantage of existing infrastructure systems, and promotes land use compatibilities through collocation of similar uses. The Project supports the strong planning processes emphasized under TEA-21. The Project is therefore consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of TEA-21.



As shown on Exhibit 3-A, data from both the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach shows that the receiving and shipping of containers have had a stable trend since the recession that hit in 2007(10)(11). Therefore, truck transport from the ports is relatively stable and a Project of this type would not be increasing the amount of truck trips and consequently VMT than what would normally occur within the basin. As such, the estimation of the Watson Industrial Park Project’s vehicular-source emissions is likely overstated in that no credit for, or reduction in, emissions is assumed based on diversion of existing trips.

EXHIBIT 3-A: PORT OF LOS ANGELES/PORT OF LONG BEACH CONTAINER COUNTS

3.2 CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS

Integrated Energy Policy Report

Senate Bill 1389 (Bowen, Chapter 568, Statutes of 2002) requires the California Energy Commission to prepare a biennial integrated energy policy report that assesses major energy trends and issues facing the state’s electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel sectors and provides policy recommendations to conserve resources; protect the environment; ensure reliable, secure, and diverse energy supplies; enhance the state’s economy; and protect public health and safety (Public Resources Code § 25301a]). The Energy Commission prepares these assessments and associated policy recommendations every two years, with updates in alternate years, as part of the Integrated Energy Policy Report.

The 2014 Integrated Energy Policy Report Update (2014 IEPR Update) focused on next steps for transforming transportation energy use in California. The 2014 Integrated Energy Policy Report Update provides the results of the California Energy Commission’s assessments of a variety of energy issues currently facing California. These issues include the role of transportation in meeting state climate, air quality, and energy goals; the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program; current and potential funding mechanisms to advance transportation policy; the status of statewide plug-in electric vehicle infrastructure; challenges and opportunities for electric vehicle infrastructure deployment; measuring success and defining metrics within the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program; market transformation benefits resulting from Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle

0.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 9,000,000.00

1995

19

96

1997

19

98

1999

20

00

2001

20

02

2003

20

04

2005

20

06

2007

20

08

2009

20

10

2011

20

12

2013

Tota

l Con

tain

ers

(Inbo

und/

Out

boun

d

Year

Port of Los Angeles

Port of Long Beach



Technology Program investments; the state of hydrogen, zero-emission vehicle, biofuels, and natural gas technologies over the next 10 years; transportation linkages with natural gas infrastructure; evaluation of methane emissions from the natural gas system and implications for the transportation system; changing trends in California’s sources of crude oil; the increasing use of crude-by-rail in California; the integration of environmental information in renewable energy planning processes; an update on electricity reliability planning for Southern California energy infrastructure; and an update to the electricity demand forecast.

State of California Energy Plan

The CEC is responsible for preparing the State Energy Plan, which identifies emerging trends related to energy supply, demand, conservation, public health and safety, and the maintenance of a healthy economy. The Plan calls for the state to assist in the transformation of the transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan identifies a number of strategies, including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators and encouragement of urban designs that reduce vehicle miles traveled and accommodate pedestrian and bicycle access. The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access, acts to reduce vehicle miles traveled, takes advantage of existing infrastructure systems, and promotes land use compatibilities through the introduction of industrial park uses on land surrounded by similarly planned uses. The Project therefore supports urban design and planning processes identified under the State of California Energy Plan, is consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of the State of California Energy Plan.

California Code Title 24, Part 6, Energy Efficiency Standards

California Code Title 24, Part 6 (also referred to as the California Energy Code), was promulgated by the CEC in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to create uniform building codes to reduce California’s energy consumption. To these ends, the California Energy Code provides energy efficiency standards for residential and nonresidential buildings. According to the CEC, the Energy Commission’s energy efficiency standards have saved Californians more than $74 billion in reduced electricity bills since 1977.(12)

California’s building efficiency standards are updated on an approximately three-year cycle. The 2013 Standards would continue to improve upon the current 2008 Standards for new construction of, and additions and alterations to, residential and nonresidential buildings. The 2013 Standards went into effect on July 1, 2014, following approval of the California Building Standards Commission.

The 2013 Energy Efficiency Standards in their entirety may be reviewed at: http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2013standards/. The 2013 Energy Efficiency Standards may also be reviewed at the California Energy Commission, 1516 Ninth Street, MS-37, Sacramento, CA 95814-5512. The Project would be designed, constructed and operated to meet or exceed incumbent Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards. On this basis, the Project is determined to be



consistent with, and would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct implementation of Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards.

4 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEAURES

4.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA

In compliance with Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines, (13) this report analyzes the project’s anticipated energy use to determine if the Project would:

• Result in the wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy; or

• Result in a substantial increase in demand or transmission service, resulting in the need for new or expanded sources of energy supply or new or expanded energy delivery systems or infrastructure.

In addition, Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines states that the means of achieving the goal of energy conservation includes the following:

• Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption;

• Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas and oil; and

• Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.

4.2 METHODOLOGY

Information from the CalEEMod 2013.2.2 outputs for the Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads (2015) (14) was utilized in this analysis, detailing Project related construction equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy demands. These outputs can be referenced in Appendix 3.1.

4.3 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS

4.3.1 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ELECTRICITY USAGE ESTIMATES

The focus within this section is the energy implications of the construction process, specifically the power cost from on-site electricity consumption during construction of the proposed Project. Based on the 2015 National Construction Estimator, Richard Pray (2015) (15), the typical power cost per 1,000 square feet of building construction per month is estimated to be $2.28. For the Watson Industrial Park development, the Project plans to develop 3,889,900 square feet of building space over the course of 36 months. Base on Table 4-1, the total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the construction of the proposed Project is estimated to be around $319,282.99. Additionally, as of February 23, 2015, SCE’s general service rate schedule (GS-1) for an industrial land use is $.07 per kWh of electricity (16). As shown on Table 4-2, the total electricity usage from on-site Project construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 4,561,186 kWh.



TABLE 4-1: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION POWER COST

Power Cost (per 1,000 SF of building per

month of construction)

Total Building Size

(1,000 SF)

Construction Duration (months)

Total Project Construction Power Cost

$2.28 3,889.90 36 $319,282.99

TABLE 4-2: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE

Cost per kWh1 Total Project Construction Electricity Usage (kWh) $0.07 4,561,186

1Assumes the Project will be under the GS-1 General Industrial service rate under SCE

4.3.2 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL ESTIMATES

Fuel consumed by construction equipment would be the primary energy resource expended over the course of Project construction. Project construction activity timeline estimates, construction equipment schedules, equipment power ratings, load factors, and associated fuel consumption estimates are presented in Table 4-3. Eight-hour daily use of all equipment is assumed. The aggregate fuel consumption rate for all equipment is estimated at 18.5 hp-hr-gal., obtained from California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2013 Emissions Factors Tables and cited fuel consumption rate factors presented in Table D-24 of the Moyer guidelines.(17)

For the purposes of this analysis, that the calculations are based on all construction equipment being diesel-powered which is standard practice consistent with industry standards. Diesel fuel would be supplied by existing commercial fuel providers serving the City and region.

As presented in Table 4-3, Project construction activities would occur in three separate phases. Phase 1 construction equipment would consume an estimated 84,380 gallons of diesel fuel. Phase 2 construction equipment would consume an estimated 85,448 gallons of diesel fuel. Lastly, Phase 3 construction equipment would consume an estimated 84,380 gallons of diesel fuel. This results in a total Project consumption (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) of 254,207 gallons of diesel fuel. Project construction would represent a “single-event” diesel fuel demand and would not require on-going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose.



TABLE 4-3A: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES

Activity/Duration Equipment HP Rating Quantity Usage Hours Load Factor HP-hrs/day Total Fuel Consumption (gal. diesel fuel)

PHASE 1

Demolition (15 days)

Concrete/Industrial Saws 81 1 8 0.73 473 384 Crushing/Proc. Equipment 85 1 8 0.78 530 430 Excavators 162 2 8 0.38 985 799 Rubber Tired Dozers 255 2 8 0.40 1,632 1,323

Site Preparation (20 days)

Water Trucks 189 2 8 0.50 1,512 1,635 Rubber Tired Dozers 255 1 8 0.40 816 882 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 1 8 0.37 287 310

Grading-Rough (45 days)

Excavators 162 1 8 0.38 492 1,198 Graders 174 1 8 0.41 571 1,388 Water Trucks 189 2 8 0.50 1,512 3,678 Rubber Tired Dozers 255 1 8 0.40 816 1,985 Scrapers 361 8 8 0.48 11,090 26,975 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 2 8 0.37 574 1,397

Building Construction (150 days)

Cranes 226 1 8 0.29 524 4,251 Forklifts 89 5 8 0.20 712 5,773 Generator Sets 84 2 8 0.74 995 8,064 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 5 8 0.37 1,436 11,640 Welders 46 2 8 0.45 331 2,685

Architectural Coating (64 days) Air Compressors 78 6 8 0.48 1,797 6,217

Paving (30 days)

Pavers 125 2 8 0.42 840 1,362 Paving Equipment 130 2 8 0.36 749 1,214 Rollers 80 2 8 0.38 486 789

TOTAL PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL DEMAND (gallons diesel fuel) 84,380 Note: Construction equipment schedules, power ratings, load factors populated from CalEEMod data presented in Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis, City of Chino (Urban Crossroads,

Inc.)



TABLE 4-3B: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES


PHASE 2










Paving (30 days)


TOTAL PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL DEMAND (gallons diesel fuel) 85,448 Note: Construction equipment schedules, power ratings, load factors populated from CalEEMod data presented in Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis, City of Chino (Urban Crossroads,

Inc.)



TABLE 4-3C: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES


PHASE 3










Paving (30 days)


TOTAL PHASE 3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL DEMAND (gallons diesel fuel) 84,380 Note: Construction equipment schedules, power ratings, load factors populated from CalEEMod data presented in Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis, City of Chino (Urban Crossroads, Inc.)



4.3.3 CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL ESTIMATES

It is assumed that all construction worker trips are from light duty autos (LDA) along area roadways. With respect to estimated VMT, the construction worker trips would generate an estimated 1,266,067 VMT during Phase 1 construction, 1,539,605 VMT during Phase 2, and 1,238,990 VMT during Phase 3 construction. This would result in a total of 4,044,662 VMT for light duty autos after full construction of the Project (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) (18). Data regarding Project related construction worker trips were based on CalEEMod 2013.2.2 model defaults utilized within the Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis.

Vehicle fuel efficiencies for LDA were estimated using information generated within the 2014 version of the Emissions FACtor model (EMFAC) developed by the Air Resources Board (ARB). EMFAC 2014 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel consumption, and VMT from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by the ARB to project changes in future emissions from on-road mobile sources (19). For purposes of this analysis, EMFAC 2014 was run for the LDA vehicle class within the California sub-area for a 2018 calendar year (consistent with the opening year of the Project). Data from EMFAC 2014 is shown in Appendix 3.2

As generated by EMFAC 2014, an aggregated fuel economy of LDAs ranging from model year 1974 to model year 2019 are estimated to have a fuel efficiency of 27.14 miles per gallon (MPG). Table 4-4 provides an estimated annual fuel consumption resulting from Project generated light duty autos related to construction worker trips. Based on Table 4-4, it is estimated that 149,030 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to construction worker trips after full construction of the proposed Project. Project construction worker trips would represent a “single-event” gasoline fuel demand and would not require on-going or permanent commitment of fuel resources for this purpose.



TABLE 4-4A: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES

Construction Activity Worker Trips / Day

Trip Length (miles)

Vehicle Miles Traveled

Average Vehicle Fuel Economy (mpg)

Estimated Fuel Consumption (gallons)

PHASE 1 Demolition (15 days)

15 14.7 3,308 27.14 122


10 14.7 2,940 27.14 108

Grading (45 days)

38 14.7 25,137 27.14 926


513 14.7 1,131,165 27.14 41,679

Architectural Coating (64 days)

103 14.7 96,902 27.14 3,570

Paving (30 days)

15 14.7 6,615 27.14 244

PHASE 1 TOTAL 46,649 PHASE 2


15 14.7 3,308 27.14 122


10 14.7 2,940 27.14 108

Grading (45 days)

38 14.7 25,137 27.14 926


619 14.7 1,364,895 27.14 50,291


124 14.7 136,710 27.14 5,037

Paving (30 days)

15 14.7 6,615 27.14 244

PHASE 2 TOTAL 56,728



TABLE 4-4B: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES

Construction Activity Worker Trips / Day

Trip Length (miles)




PHASE 3 Demolition (15 days)

15 14.7 3,308 27.14 122


10 14.7 2,940 27.14 108

Grading (45 days)

38 14.7 25,137 27.14 926


502 14.7 1,106,910 27.14 40,785


100 14.7 94,080 27.14 3,466

Paving (30 days)

15 14.7 6,615 27.14 244

PHASE 3 TOTAL 45,652 PROJECT TOTAL (PHASE 1 + 2 + 3) 149,030



4.3.4 CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL ESTIMATES

With respect to estimated VMT, the construction vendor trips would generate an estimated 103,500 VMT during Phase 1, 125,235 VMT during Phase 2, and 101,430 VMT for Phase 3 along area roadways. It is assumed that 50% of all vendor trips are from medium-heavy duty trucks (MHD) and 50% are from heavy-heavy duty trucks (HHD). These assumptions are consistent with the 2013.2.2 CalEEMod defaults utilized within the Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis. Vehicle fuel efficiencies for MHD and HHD trucks were estimated using information generated within EMFAC 2014. For purposes of this analysis, EMFAC 2014 was run for the MHD and HHD vehicle class within the California sub-area for a 2018 calendar year (consistent with the opening year of the Project). Data from EMFAC 2014 is shown in Appendix 3.2

As generated by EMFAC 2014, an aggregated fuel economy of MHD trucks ranging from model year 1974 to model year 2019 are estimated to have a fuel efficiency of 8.17 mpg. Additionally, HHD trucks are estimated to have a fuel efficiency of 5.77 mpg.

Table 4-5 and Table 4-6 shows the estimated fuel economy of MHD and HHD trucks accessing the Project site. Based on Table 4-5 and Table 4-6, fuel consumption from construction vendor trips (medium and heavy duty trucks) will total approximately 97,633 gallons. Project construction vendor trips would represent a “single-event” diesel fuel demand and would not require on-going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose.



TABLE 4-5: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES (MHD TRUCKS)1

Construction Activity Vendor Trips

/ Day Trip Length

(miles) Vehicle

Miles Traveled Average Vehicle Fuel

Economy (mpg) Estimated Fuel

Consumption (gallons) PHASE 1

Building Construction (150 days) 100 6.9 103,500 8.17 12,668

PHASE 2


PHASE 3


PROJECT MEDIUM DUTY TRUCK TOTAL (PHASE 1 + 2 + 3) 40,412

TABLE 4-6: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES (HHD TRUCKS)2

Construction Activity Vendor Trips / Day

Trip Length (miles)




PHASE 1


PHASE 2


PHASE 3


PROJECT HEAVY DUTY TRUCK TOTAL (PHASE 1 + 2 + 3) 57,221

1 Assumptions for the vendor trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with 2013.2.2 model defaults utilized within the Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis. 2 Assumptions for the vendor trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with 2013.2.2 model defaults utilized within the Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis.



4.3.5 CONSTRUCTION FUEL ESTIMATES FROM HAULING

As stated in the Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis, the Project site will require demolition activity and the hauling of demolition material within Phases 1-3 (20). With respect to estimated VMT, the trips associated with the hauling of demolition debris would generate an estimated 10,300 VMT along area roadways.

Additionally, the Project site will require around 114,000 cubic yards of soil import over the course of the 3 years in order to balance. With respect to estimated VMT, the hauling trips associated with the 114,000 cubic yards of soil import would generate an estimated 285,000 VMT along area roadways. These assumptions are consistent with the 2013.2.2 CalEEMod defaults utilized within the Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis.

It is assumed that 100% of all hauling trips are from HHD trucks. As stated previously, an aggregated fuel economy of HHD trucks ranging from model year 1974 to model year 2019 are estimated to have a fuel efficiency of 5.77 mpg. Table 4-7 shows the estimated fuel economy of hauling activity from HHD trucks accessing the Project site. Based on Table 4-7, it is estimated that 51,179 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to the hauling of demolition debris and the 114,000 cubic yards of soil import.

TABLE 4-7: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES (HHD TRUCKS)

Construction Activity Hauling Trips

Trip Length (miles)




Demolition (Phase 1) 113 20 2,260 5.77 392 Demolition (Phase 2) 237 20 4,740 5.77 821 Demolition (Phase 3) 165 20 3,300 5.77 572 Grading (Phase 1-3) 14250 20 285,000 5.77 49,393

PROJECT TOTAL (PHASE 1 + 2 + 3) 51,179



4.3.6 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES

The equipment used for Project construction would conform to CARB regulations and CA emissions standards and would evince related fuel efficiencies. There are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities; or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.

The Project would utilize construction contractors which practice compliance with applicable CARB regulation regarding retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of diesel off-road construction equipment. Additionally CARB has adopted the Airborne Toxic Control Measure to limit heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and other Toxic Air Contaminants. Compliance with anti-idling and emissions regulations would result in a more efficient use of construction-related energy and the minimization or elimination of wasteful or unnecessary consumption of energy. Idling restrictions and the use of newer engines and equipment would result in less fuel combustion and energy consumption.

Additionally, certain incidental construction-source energy efficiencies would likely accrue through implementation of California regulations and best available control measures (BACM). More specifically, California Code of Regulations Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than five minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. To this end, “grading plans shall reference the requirement that a sign shall be posted on-site stating that construction workers need to shut off engines at or before five minutes of idling.” In this manner, construction equipment operators are informed that engines are to be turned off at or prior to five minutes of idling. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through periodic site inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen complaints. Indirectly, construction energy efficiencies and energy conservation would be achieved for the proposed development through energy efficiencies realized from bulk purchase, transport and use of construction materials.

A full analysis related to the energy needed to form construction materials is not included in this analysis due to a lack of detailed Project-specific information on construction materials. At this time an analysis of the energy needed to create Project-related construction materials would be extremely speculative and thus has not been prepared.

In general, the construction processes promote conservation and efficient use of energy by reducing raw materials demands, with related reduction in energy demands associated with raw materials extraction, transportation, processing and refinement. Use of materials in bulk reduces energy demands associated with preparation and transport of construction materials as transport and disposal of construction waste and solid waste in general, with corollary



reduced demands on area landfill capacities and energy consumed by waste transport and landfill operations.

4.3.7 SUMMARY

The estimated power cost of on-site electricity usage during the construction of the proposed Project is assumed to be around $319,282.99. Additionally, based on the assumed power cost, it is estimated that the total electricity usage during construction, after full Project build-out, is calculated to be around 4,561,186 kWh.

Construction equipment used by the Project would result in single event consumption of approximately 254,207 gallons of diesel fuel. Construction equipment use of fuel would not be atypical for the type of construction proposed because there are no aspects of the Project’s proposed construction process that are unusual or energy-intensive, and Project construction equipment would conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote equipment fuel efficiencies. CCR Title 13, Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than 5 minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. Best available control measures inform construction equipment operators of this requirement. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through periodic site inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen complaints.

Construction worker trips for all phases of the proposed Project’s construction would result in the estimated fuel consumption of 149,030 gallons of fuel. Additionally, fuel consumption from construction vendor trips (medium and heavy duty trucks) will total approximately 97,633 gallons. Lastly, the estimated fuel consumption from construction related hauling activity would be estimated to be around 51,179 gallons. Diesel fuel would be supplied by City and regional commercial vendors. Indirectly, construction energy efficiencies and energy conservation would be achieved through the use of bulk purchases, transport and use of construction materials. The 2014 IEPR released by the California Energy Commission has shown that fuel efficiencies are getting better within on and off-road vehicle engines due to more stringent government requirements. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project construction energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

4.4 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS

Energy consumption in support of or related to Project operations would include transportation energy demands (energy consumed by employee and patron vehicles accessing the Project site) and facilities energy demands (energy consumed by building operations and site maintenance activities).

4.4.1 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS

Energy that would be consumed by Project-generated traffic is a function of total VMT and estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site.



LIGHT DUTY AUTOS

With respect to estimated VMT, and based on the trip frequency and trip length methodologies cited in the Project’s Air Quality Impact Analysis, the Project would generate an estimated 17,337,895 annual VMT along area roadways for passenger cars with full build-out of the Project (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) (18). As generated by EMFAC 2014, an aggregated fuel economy of LDAs ranging from model year 1974 to model year 2019 are estimated to have a fuel efficiency of 27.14 mpg. Table 4-8 provides an estimated range of annual fuel consumption resulting from Project generated LDAs. Based on Table 4-8, it is estimated that 638,832 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to the Project generated LDA trips.

TABLE 4-8: PROJECT-GENERATED PASSENGER CAR TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION

Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled


Estimated Annual Fuel Consumption (gallons)

PHASE 1 + 2 + 3 17,337,895 27.14 638,832

LIGHT-HEAVY DUTY TRUCKS

With respect to estimated VMT, and based on the trip frequency and trip length methodologies cited in the Project’s Air Quality Impact Analysis, the Project would generate an estimated 9,291,652 annual VMT along area roadways for LHD trucks with full build-out of the Project (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) (18). As generated by EMFAC 2014, an aggregated fuel economy of LHD trucks ranging from model year 1974 to model year 2019 are estimated to have a fuel efficiency of 12.94 mpg. Additionally, Table 4-9 shows the estimated fuel economy of LHD trucks accessing the Project site. Based on Table 4-9, it is estimated that 718,057 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to the Project generated LHD truck trips.

TABLE 4-9: PROJECT-GENERATED LHD TRUCK TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION




PHASE 1 + 2 + 3 9,291,652 12.94 718,057

MEDIUM-HEAVY DUTY TRUCKS

With respect to estimated VMT, and based on the trip frequency and trip length methodologies cited in the Project’s Air Quality Impact Analysis, the Project would generate an estimated 7,474,730 annual VMT along area roadways for MHD trucks with full build-out of the Project (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) (18) As generated by EMFAC 2014, an aggregated fuel economy of MHD trucks ranging from model year 1974 to model year 2019 are estimated to have a fuel efficiency of 8.17 mpg. Additionally, Table 4-10 shows the estimated fuel economy of MHD trucks accessing



the Project site. Based on Table 4-10, it is estimated that 914,900 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to the Project generated MHD truck trips.

TABLE 4-10: PROJECT-GENERATED MHD TRUCK TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION




PHASE 1 + 2 + 3 7,474,730 8.17 914,900

HEAVY-HEAVY DUTY TRUCKS

With respect to estimated VMT, and based on the trip frequency and trip length methodologies cited in the Project’s Air Quality Impact Analysis, the Project would generate an estimated 25,487,605 annual VMT along area roadways for HHD trucks with full build-out of the Project (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) (18). As generated by EMFAC 2014, an aggregated fuel economy of HHD trucks ranging from model year 1974 to model year 2019 are estimated to have a fuel efficiency of 5.77 mpg. Additionally, Table 4-11 shows the estimated fuel economy of HHD trucks accessing the Project site. Based on Table 4-11, it is estimated that 4,417,263 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to the Project generated HHD truck trips.

TABLE 4-11: PROJECT-GENERATED HHD TRUCK TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION




PHASE 1 + 2 + 3 25,487,605 5.77 4,417,263

TABLE 4-12: PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION (ALL VEHICLES)

Vehicle Type Annual Miles Traveled Estimated Annual Fuel Consumption (gallons)

Light Duty Autos 17,337,895 638,832 LHD Trucks 9,291,652 718,057 MHD Trucks 7,474,730 914,900 HHD Trucks 25,487,605 4,417,263

Total (All Vehicles) 59,591,882 6,689,052

As summarized on Table 4-12, the Project will result in 59,591,882 annual VMT and an estimated annual fuel consumption of 6,689,052 gallons of fuel.



4.4.2 FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS

Project building operations and Project site maintenance activities would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by The Gas Company; electricity would be supplied to the Project by Southern California Edison. Annual natural gas and electricity demands of the Project without implementation of mitigation measures are summarized in Table 4-13. Annual natural gas and electricity demands of the Project, after implementation of Mitigation Measures listed in Section 1.4, are summarized in Table 4-14. With implementation of Mitigation Measures, natural gas and electricity would be reduced by 395,330 kBTU/year and 100,650 kWh/year respectively.

Energy use in buildings is divided into energy consumed by the built environment and energy consumed by uses that are independent of the construction of the building such as in plug-in appliances. In California, the California Building Standards Code Title 24 governs energy consumed by the built environment, mechanical systems, and some types of fixed lighting (21).

Non-building energy use, or “plug-in” energy use can be further subdivided by specific end-use (refrigeration, cooking, appliances, etc.).

TABLE 4-13: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY (WITHOUT MITIGATION)

Natural Gas Demand kBTU/year Phase 1 + 2 + 3

Refrigerated Warehouse 49,946,300 Unrefrigerated Warehouse 5,222,190 Total Project (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) Natural Gas Demand 55,168,490 kBTU/year

Electricity Demand kWh/year Phase 1 + 2 + 3

Refrigerated Warehouse 39,813,100 Unrefrigerated Warehouse 8,518,880 Total Project (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) Electricity Demand 48,331,980 kWh/year



TABLE 4-14: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY (WITH MITIGATION)

Natural Gas Demand kBTU/year Phase 1 + 2 + 3

Refrigerated Warehouse 49,807,700 Unrefrigerated Warehouse 4,965,460 Total Project (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) Natural Gas Demand 54,773,160 kBTU/year

Electricity Demand kWh/year Phase 1 + 2 + 3

Refrigerated Warehouse 39,763,500 Unrefrigerated Warehouse 8,467,830 Total Project (Phase 1 + 2 + 3) Electricity Demand 48,231,330 kWh/year

4.4.3 OPERATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES

Energy efficient/energy conserving design features and operational programs that would be implemented under the Project are summarized below. Also noted in the following discussions, energy efficiency/energy conservation attributes of the Project would be complemented by increasingly stringent state and federal regulatory actions addressing vehicle fuel economies and vehicle emissions standards; and enhanced building/utilities energy efficiencies mandated under California building codes (e.g., Title24, California Green Building Code). In this latter regard, pursuant to AQIA mitigation measure MM AQ-5, the Project in total would be required to surpass by 3 percent 2013 performance standards established under the Building Energy Efficiency Standards contained in the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24, Part 6 (Title 24, Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards).

Enhanced Vehicle Fuel Efficiencies

Estimated annual fuel consumption estimates presented previously in Table 4-12 represent likely potential maximums that would occur in the Project. Under subsequent future conditions, average fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site can be expected to improve as older, less fuel efficient vehicles are removed from circulation, and in response to fuel economy and emissions standards imposed on newer vehicles entering the circulation system.

Based on MM AQ-6, the project applicant shall encourage its tenants to use alternative-fueled vehicles such as compressed natural gas vehicles, electric vehicles or other alternative fuels by providing publicly available information. Nonetheless, a minimum of two electric vehicle charging stations will be installed per building.



Alternative Transportation

Carpooling

Pursuant to MM AQ-4 of the AQIA, the Project will reduce vehicle miles traveled and associated exhaust emissions by creating preferential parking for carpoolers and vanpools to encourage ridesharing and alternative forms of transportation for employees.

Pedestrian Access

Pursuant to the development’s project design feature, project walkways and pedestrian crosswalks would be provided consistent with the City of Chino’s requirements.

Energy Efficient/Energy Conserving Systems, Fixtures, and Operational Programs

Water Conservation

Pursuant to MM AQ-3 in the AQIA, to reduce energy demand associated with potable water conveyance, the project shall implement the following:

• Landscaping palette emphasizing drought tolerant plants;

• Use of water-efficient irrigation techniques;

• U.S. EPA Certified WaterSense labeled or equivalent faucets, high-efficiency toilets (HETs), and water-conserving shower heads.

Landscaping

Pursuant of MM AQ-3 in the AQIA, landscaping throughout the Project site would be provided consistent with the City of Chino requirements, and recognizing competing demands for available water resources. Drought-tolerant plants would be used, where appropriate, reducing water consumption and power demand related to water delivery/irrigation systems. As noted previously, reduced water consumption provides corollary energy conservation benefits by reducing related water/wastewater conveyance and treatment energy consumption.

4.5 SUMMARY

4.5.1 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS

Annual vehicular trips and related VMT generated by the Project would result in an estimated 638,832 gallons of fuel consumption per year for LDAs. Additionally, the Project would result in an estimated 718,057 gallons of fuel consumption per year for LHD trucks. In regards to MHD trucks, the Project would result in an estimated 914,900 gallons of fuel consumption per year. For HHD trucks an estimated 4,417,263 gallons of fuel consumption per year is estimated for the year 2018. The total estimated annual fuel consumption from Project generated VMT would result in a fuel demand of 6,689,052 gallons of fuel.

Fuel would be provided by current and future commercial vendors. Trip generation and VMT generated by the Project are consistent with other warehouse uses of similar scale and configuration, as reflected respectively in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip



Generation Manual (9th Ed., 2012); and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) v2013.2.2. That is, the Project does not propose uses or operations that would inherently result in excessive and wasteful vehicle trips and VMT, nor associated excess and wasteful vehicle energy consumption.

Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and related transition of LDVs and HDVs to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, bio fuels, hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT. Location of the Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region, acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands. The Project would also implement sidewalks, facilitating and encouraging pedestrian access. Facilitating pedestrian and bicycle access would reduce VMT and associated energy consumption. Additionally, the Project would encourage the use of electric vehicle (EVs) through the installation of electric vehicle charging stations. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

4.5.2 FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS

Project facility operational energy demands with implementation of mitigation measures are estimated at: 54,773,160 kBTU/year of natural gas; and 48,231,330 kWh/year of electricity. Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by The Gas Company; electricity would be supplied by Southern California Edison. The Project proposes conventional warehouse uses reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. Uses proposed by the Project are not inherently energy intensive, and the Project energy demands in total would be comparable to, or less than, other warehouse projects of similar scale and configuration.

Energy demands of the Project are reduced through design features and operational programs that in aggregate would ensure that Project energy efficiencies would surpass incumbent Title 24 energy efficiency requirements by a minimum of 3 percent pursuant to the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP). Various energy conserving features and operational programs that would be realized under the Project are discussed previously. Based on the preceding, Project facilities energy demands and energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

4.6 CONCLUSIONS

As supported by the preceding analyses, Project construction and operations would not result in the inefficient, wasteful or unnecessary consumption of energy. Further, the energy demands of the Project can be accommodated within the context of available resources and energy delivery systems. Mitigation measures listed in Section 1.4 would act to further reduce the Project’s natural gas, electricity, and fuel demand. Notwithstanding as shown in Table 4-13 and 4-14, with implementation of Mitigation Measures, the Project’s annual natural gas and electricity demand would be reduced by 395,330 kBTU/year and 100,650 kWh/year respectively. The Project would therefore not cause or result in the need for additional energy producing or transmission facilities. The Project would not engage in wasteful or inefficient uses



of energy and aims to achieve energy conservations goals within the State of California. Notwithstanding, the Project proposes warehousing land uses and will not have any long-term effects on an energy provider’s future energy development or future energy conservation strategies.



5 REFERENCES

1. Building Standards Commission. CALGreen. [Online] 2010. [Cited: November 13, 2013.] http://www.bsc.ca.gov/home/calgreen.aspx.

2. California Energy Commission. Energy Almanac. Total Electricity System Power. [Online] September 25, 2014. http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/total_system_power.html.

3. —. 2013 Integrated Energy Policy Report, IEPR. 2013. 4. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California Energy Consumption by End-Use Sector. California

State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online] [Cited: September 17, 2014.] http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs1..

5. —. State Profile and Energy Estimates. Independent Statistics and Analysis. [Online] [Cited: September 17, 2014.] http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs2..

6. California Energy Commission. 2014 IEPR Update. 2014. 7. —. California Energy Almanac. Utility Energy Supply Plans from 2013. [Online] [Cited: September 17,

2014.] http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/s-2_supply_forms_2013/. 8. California ISO. Understanding the ISO . [Online] [Cited: September 17, 2014.]

http://www.caiso.com/about/Pages/OurBusiness/UnderstandingtheISO/default.aspx. 9. California Public Utilities Commission. Natural Gas and California. [Online] [Cited: September 17,

2014.] http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/puc/energy/gas/natgasandca.htm. 10. Port of Los Angeles. TEU Statistics (Container Counts). [Online] April 15, 2014. [Cited: May 23, 2014.]

http://www.portoflosangeles.org/maritime/stats.asp. 11. The Port of Long Beach. Yearly TEUs. [Online] [Cited: 23 2014, May.]

http://www.polb.com/economics/stats/yearly_teus.asp. 12. California Energy Commission. California's Energy Efficiency Standards Have Saved $74 Billion.

[Online] [Cited: September 17, 2014.] http://www.energy.ca.gov/efficiency/savings.html. 13. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act Guideline, California Public Resources Code,

Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3,. 14. Urban Crossroads. Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis. Irvine : s.n., 2015. 15. Pray, Richard. 2015 National Construction Estimator. Carlsbad : Craftsman Book Company, 2015.

ISSN 0547-5511. 16. Southern California Edison. Schedule GS-1. Regulatory Information - Rates Pricing. [Online]

https://www.sce.com/NR/sc3/tm2/pdf/ce74-12.pdf. 17. California Air Resources Board. Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality

Projects For Evaluating Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Projects And Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Projects, Emission Factor Tables. 2013.

18. Urban Crossroads. Watson Industrial Park Air Quality Impact Analysis. Irvine : s.n., 2015. 19. California Department of Transportation. EMFAC Software. [Online]

http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/air/pages/emfac.htm. 20. Urban Crossroads. Watson Industrial Park AIr Quality Impact Analysis. 2014.



21. State of California. Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings. [Online] http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/.






6 CERTIFICATION

The contents of this energy analysis report represent an accurate depiction of the impacts associated with the proposed Watson Industrial Park Project. The information contained in this air quality impact report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 660-1994 ext. 217.

Haseeb Qureshi Senior Associate URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 (949) 660-1994 x217 [email protected]

EDUCATION

Master of Science in Environmental Studies California State University, Fullerton • May, 2010

Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design University of California, Irvine • June, 2006

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AEP – Association of Environmental Planners AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials

PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Environmental Site Assessment – American Society for Testing and Materials • June, 2013 Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute • June, 2011 Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene – EMSL Analytical • April, 2008 Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring – California Air Resources Board • August, 2007 AB2588 Regulatory Standards – Trinity Consultants • November, 2006 Air Dispersion Modeling – Lakes Environmental • June, 2006

mailto:[email protected]


09646-03 Energy Analysis Report




APPENDIX 3.1:

CALEEMOD EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS

San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual

Phase 1+2+3 2020 (Cars Only)

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population

Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 972.48 1000sqft 22.32 972,475.00 0

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 2,917.43 1000sqft 66.97 2,917,425.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization

Climate Zone

Urban

10

Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

Utility Company Southern California Edison

2020Operational Year

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

466.91 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 3/4/2015 4:17 PMPage 1 of 21

Project Characteristics - Source: CPUC GHG Calculator version 3c, worksheet tab “CO2 Allocations,” cells AH/AQ 35-44.

Land Use - based on information from the applicant

Construction Phase - construction emissions not modeled

Off-road Equipment - based on consultation with the applicant

Off-road Equipment - construction emissions not modeled

Trips and VMT -

Demolition -

Grading -

Architectural Coating -

Vehicle Trips - TR based on the Watson corporate center TIA

Vechicle Emission Factors - Cars Only



Area Coating -

Energy Use - Title-24 Electricity Energy Intensity and Title-24 Natural Gas Energy Intensity were adjusted by 21.8% and 16.8% respectively, to reflect 2013 Title 24 requirements. Source: Impact Analysis California's 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (CEC 2013)

Water And Wastewater - Based on the WSA for the Watson Corporate Center Project by RBF. Table 3.2-1 (Feb 2015)

Solid Waste -

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - .

Mobile Commute Mitigation -

Area Mitigation -

Energy Mitigation -

Water Mitigation -

Operational Off-Road Equipment - based on CARB Cargo Handling Equipment Yard Truck Emission Testing Report. hours per day based on the Port of Long Beach Air Emissions Inventory (June 2008)

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00

tblEnergyUse T24E 1.30 1.02



tblEnergyUse T24NG 3.42 2.85


tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 972,480.00 972,475.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,917,430.00 2,917,425.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 22.33 22.32

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00



tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear 260.00 365.00

tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHorsePower 97.00 200.00

tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay 8.00 4.00

tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperLoadFactor 0.37 0.39

tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber 0.00 14.00

tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 630.89 466.91

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020

tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 0.00



tblVehicleEF LDA 0.47 1.00



tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.07 0.00







tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.00



tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.0790e-003 0.00



tblVehicleEF MCY 5.0120e-003 0.00



tblVehicleEF MDV 0.16 0.00



tblVehicleEF MH 2.9620e-003 0.00



tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00



tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1080e-003 0.00



tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.7200e-004 0.00



tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.3370e-003 0.00



tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.59 1.04


2.0 Emissions Summary


tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.59 1.04


tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.59 1.04


tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 224,886,000.00 10,784,838.00


tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 10,784,838.00



2.1 Overall Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year tons/yr MT/yr

2016 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year tons/yr MT/yr

2016 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


2.2 Overall Operational


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Energy 0.2055 0.2055 0.0000 13,180.0835

13,180.0835

0.6922 0.1855 13,252.1281

Mobile 0.0382 6.4985 0.0000 4,169.1680

4,169.1680

0.1712 0.0000 4,172.7634

Offroad 0.1578 0.1578 0.0000 750.1272 750.1272 0.2426 0.0000 755.2220

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 742.2385 0.0000 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Water 0.0000 0.0000 13.6861 220.4692 234.1553 1.4194 0.0360 275.1301

Total 0.4018 6.8621 755.9246 18,319.9444

19,075.8690

46.3907 0.2215 20,118.7498

Unmitigated Operational




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Energy 0.2041 0.2041 0.0000 13,137.6716

13,137.6716

0.6905 0.1849 13,209.4751

Mobile 0.0382 6.4985 0.0000 4,169.1680

4,169.1680

0.1712 0.0000 4,172.7634

Offroad 0.1578 0.1578 0.0000 750.1272 750.1272 0.2426 0.0000 755.2220

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 742.2385 0.0000 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Water 0.0000 0.0000 10.9489 190.4845 201.4334 1.1362 0.0290 234.2704

Total 0.4003 6.8606 753.1874 18,247.5479

19,000.7353

46.1058 0.2138 20,035.2371

Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase

Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2016 1/1/2016 5 1


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.65 2.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 4.49 4.33 1.14 3.48 4.17


3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

OffRoad Equipment

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor

Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73

Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0

Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0

Acres of Paving: 0


3.2 Demolition - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated Construction On-Site


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site


4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated Construction On-Site


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated Construction Off-Site



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Unmitigated 0.0382 6.4985 0.0000 4,169.1680

4,169.1680

0.1712 0.0000 4,172.7634

Mitigated 0.0382 6.4985 0.0000 4,169.1680

4,169.1680

0.1712 0.0000 4,172.7634

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1,011.38 1,011.38 1011.38 4,334,485 4,334,485

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 3,034.13 3,034.13 3034.13 13,003,410 13,003,410

Total 4,045.51 4,045.51 4,045.51 17,337,895 17,337,895

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3

Implement Trip Reduction Program

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000


5.0 Energy Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.2055 0.2055 0.0000 2,944.0016

2,944.0016

0.0564 0.0540 2,961.9183

Electricity Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10,214.7653

10,214.7653

0.6344 0.1313 10,268.7805

Electricity Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10,236.0819

10,236.0819

0.6358 0.1315 10,290.2098

NaturalGas Mitigated

0.2041 0.2041 0.0000 2,922.9063

2,922.9063

0.0560 0.0536 2,940.6946

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

Exceed Title 24

4.4 Fleet Mix

Historical Energy Use: N


5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr

Refrigerated Warehouse-No

Rail

4.99463e+007

0.1861 0.1861 0.0000 2,665.3256

2,665.3256

0.0511 0.0489 2,681.5464

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No

Rail

5.22219e+006

0.0195 0.0195 0.0000 278.6760 278.6760 5.3400e-003

5.1100e-003

280.3720

Total 0.2055 0.2055 0.0000 2,944.0016

2,944.0016

0.0564 0.0540 2,961.9183

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




Rail

4.98077e+007

0.1856 0.1856 0.0000 2,657.9306

2,657.9306

0.0509 0.0487 2,674.1063


Rail

4.96546e+006

0.0185 0.0185 0.0000 264.9757 264.9757 5.0800e-003

4.8600e-003

266.5883

Total 0.2041 0.2041 0.0000 2,922.9063

2,922.9063

0.0560 0.0536 2,940.6946

Mitigated


6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

Electricity Use

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr


Rail

3.98131e+007

8,431.8952

0.5237 0.1084 8,476.4827


Rail

8.51888e+006

1,804.1867

0.1121 0.0232 1,813.7271

Total 10,236.0819

0.6358 0.1315 10,290.2098

Unmitigated

Electricity Use




Rail

3.97635e+007

8,421.3914

0.5231 0.1082 8,465.9233


Rail

8.46783e+006

1,793.3739

0.1114 0.0231 1,802.8572

Total 10,214.7653

0.6345 0.1313 10,268.7805

Mitigated



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Unmitigated 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Mitigated 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

6.2 Area by SubCategory


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

Architectural Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Landscaping 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Total 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Unmitigated


Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet

Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet

Install Low Flow Toilet

Install Low Flow Shower

Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Total 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Mitigated



Category MT/yr

Unmitigated 234.1553 1.4194 0.0360 275.1301

Mitigated 201.4334 1.1362 0.0290 234.2704

7.2 Water by Land Use

Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr


Rail

10.7848 / 10.7848

58.5388 0.3549 9.0100e-003

68.7825


Rail

32.3545 / 32.3545

175.6165 1.0645 0.0270 206.3476

Total 234.1553 1.4194 0.0360 275.1301

Unmitigated


8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste


Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr


Rail

8.62787 / 10.127

50.3584 0.2841 7.2400e-003

58.5676


Rail

25.8836 / 30.3809

151.0750 0.8521 0.0217 175.7028

Total 201.4334 1.1362 0.0290 234.2704

Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail


MT/yr

Mitigated 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Unmitigated 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Category/Year


8.2 Waste by Land Use

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr


Rail

914.13 185.5601 10.9663 0.0000 415.8522


Rail

2742.38 556.6784 32.8988 0.0000 1,247.5521

Total 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Unmitigated

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr


Rail

914.13 185.5601 10.9663 0.0000 415.8522


Rail

2742.38 556.6784 32.8988 0.0000 1,247.5521

Total 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad


10.0 Vegetation


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Equipment Type tons/yr MT/yr

Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes

0.1578 0.1578 0.0000 750.1272 750.1272 0.2426 0.0000 755.2220

Total 0.1578 0.1578 0.0000 750.1272 750.1272 0.2426 0.0000 755.2220

UnMitigated/Mitigated

Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 14 4.00 365 200 0.39 Diesel


San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual

Phase 1+2+3 2020 (Trucks Only)

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population

Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 972.48 1000sqft 22.32 972,475.00 0

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 2,917.43 1000sqft 66.97 2,917,425.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization

Climate Zone

Urban

10

Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

Utility Company Southern California Edison

2020Operational Year

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

466.91 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)


Project Characteristics - Source: CPUC GHG Calculator version 3c, worksheet tab “CO2 Allocations,” cells AH/AQ 35-44.

Land Use - based on information from the applicant

Construction Phase - construction emissions not modeled

Off-road Equipment - based on consultation with the applicant

Off-road Equipment - construction emissions not modeled

Trips and VMT -

Demolition -

Grading -

Architectural Coating -

Vehicle Trips - TR based on the Watson corporate center TIA

Vechicle Emission Factors - trucks only



Area Coating -

Energy Use - Title-24 Electricity Energy Intensity and Title-24 Natural Gas Energy Intensity were adjusted by 21.8% and 16.8% respectively, to reflect 2013 Title 24 requirements. Source: Impact Analysis California's 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (CEC 2013)

Water And Wastewater - Based on the WSA for the Watson Corporate Center Project by RBF. Table 3.2-1 (Feb 2015)

Solid Waste -

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - .

Mobile Commute Mitigation -

Area Mitigation -

Energy Mitigation -

Water Mitigation -

Operational Off-Road Equipment - based on CARB Cargo Handling Equipment Yard Truck Emission Testing Report. hours per day based on the Port of Long Beach Air Emissions Inventory (June 2008)

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00






tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 972,480.00 972,475.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,917,430.00 2,917,425.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 22.33 22.32




tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear 260.00 365.00

tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHorsePower 97.00 200.00

tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay 8.00 4.00

tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperLoadFactor 0.37 0.39

tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber 0.00 14.00

tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 630.89 466.91

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020









































tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 50.00


2.0 Emissions Summary

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 50.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 50.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 50.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 50.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 50.00












2.1 Overall Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year tons/yr MT/yr

2016 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year tons/yr MT/yr

2016 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Energy 0.2055 0.2055 0.0000 13,180.0835

13,180.0835

0.6922 0.1855 13,252.1281

Mobile 2.9586 20.9393 0.0000 50,470.3340

50,470.3340

0.4006 0.0000 50,478.7459

Offroad 0.1578 0.1578 0.0000 750.1272 750.1272 0.2426 0.0000 755.2220

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 742.2385 0.0000 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Water 0.0000 0.0000 13.6861 220.4692 234.1553 1.4194 0.0360 275.1301

Total 3.3222 21.3028 755.9246 64,621.1103

65,377.0350

46.6201 0.2215 66,424.7323

Unmitigated Operational




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Energy 0.2041 0.2041 0.0000 13,137.6716

13,137.6716

0.6905 0.1849 13,209.4751

Mobile 2.9586 20.9393 0.0000 50,470.3340

50,470.3340

0.4006 0.0000 50,478.7459

Offroad 0.1578 0.1578 0.0000 750.1272 750.1272 0.2426 0.0000 755.2220

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 742.2385 0.0000 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Water 0.0000 0.0000 10.9489 190.4845 201.4334 1.1362 0.0290 234.2704

Total 3.3207 21.3013 753.1874 64,548.7138

65,301.9012

46.3351 0.2138 66,341.2196

Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase

Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2016 1/1/2016 5 1


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.79 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 1.27 1.26 1.13 3.48 1.26


3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

OffRoad Equipment

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor

Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73

Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0

Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0

Acres of Paving: 0




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated Construction On-Site


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site


4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated Construction On-Site


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated Construction Off-Site



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Unmitigated 2.9586 20.9393 0.0000 50,470.3340

50,470.3340

0.4006 0.0000 50,478.7459

Mitigated 2.9586 20.9393 0.0000 50,470.3340

50,470.3340

0.4006 0.0000 50,478.7459

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 622.39 622.39 622.39 10,563,524 10,563,524

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1,867.16 1,867.16 1867.16 31,690,463 31,690,463

Total 2,489.54 2,489.54 2,489.54 42,253,987 42,253,987

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail

50.00 50.00 50.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail

50.00 50.00 50.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.219900 0.000000 0.176900 0.603200 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000


5.0 Energy Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.2055 0.2055 0.0000 2,944.0016

2,944.0016

0.0564 0.0540 2,961.9183

Electricity Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10,214.7653

10,214.7653

0.6344 0.1313 10,268.7805

Electricity Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10,236.0819

10,236.0819

0.6358 0.1315 10,290.2098

NaturalGas Mitigated

0.2041 0.2041 0.0000 2,922.9063

2,922.9063

0.0560 0.0536 2,940.6946

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

Exceed Title 24

4.4 Fleet Mix

Historical Energy Use: N


5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




Rail

4.99463e+007

0.1861 0.1861 0.0000 2,665.3256

2,665.3256

0.0511 0.0489 2,681.5464


Rail

5.22219e+006

0.0195 0.0195 0.0000 278.6760 278.6760 5.3400e-003

5.1100e-003

280.3720

Total 0.2055 0.2055 0.0000 2,944.0016

2,944.0016

0.0564 0.0540 2,961.9183

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




Rail

4.98077e+007

0.1856 0.1856 0.0000 2,657.9306

2,657.9306

0.0509 0.0487 2,674.1063


Rail

4.96546e+006

0.0185 0.0185 0.0000 264.9757 264.9757 5.0800e-003

4.8600e-003

266.5883

Total 0.2041 0.2041 0.0000 2,922.9063

2,922.9063

0.0560 0.0536 2,940.6946

Mitigated


6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

Electricity Use




Rail

3.98131e+007

8,431.8952

0.5237 0.1084 8,476.4827


Rail

8.51888e+006

1,804.1867

0.1121 0.0232 1,813.7271

Total 10,236.0819

0.6358 0.1315 10,290.2098

Unmitigated

Electricity Use




Rail

3.97635e+007

8,421.3914

0.5231 0.1082 8,465.9233


Rail

8.46783e+006

1,793.3739

0.1114 0.0231 1,802.8572

Total 10,214.7653

0.6345 0.1313 10,268.7805

Mitigated



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Unmitigated 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Mitigated 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Total 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Unmitigated


Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet

Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet

Install Low Flow Toilet

Install Low Flow Shower

Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Total 1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.0965 0.0965 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.1020

Mitigated



Category MT/yr

Unmitigated 234.1553 1.4194 0.0360 275.1301

Mitigated 201.4334 1.1362 0.0290 234.2704


Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr


Rail

10.7848 / 10.7848

58.5388 0.3549 9.0100e-003

68.7825


Rail

32.3545 / 32.3545

175.6165 1.0645 0.0270 206.3476

Total 234.1553 1.4194 0.0360 275.1301

Unmitigated


8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste


Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr


Rail

8.62787 / 10.127

50.3584 0.2841 7.2400e-003

58.5676


Rail

25.8836 / 30.3809

151.0750 0.8521 0.0217 175.7028

Total 201.4334 1.1362 0.0290 234.2704

Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail


MT/yr

Mitigated 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Unmitigated 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Category/Year


8.2 Waste by Land Use

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr


Rail

914.13 185.5601 10.9663 0.0000 415.8522


Rail

2742.38 556.6784 32.8988 0.0000 1,247.5521

Total 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Unmitigated

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr


Rail

914.13 185.5601 10.9663 0.0000 415.8522


Rail

2742.38 556.6784 32.8988 0.0000 1,247.5521

Total 742.2385 43.8650 0.0000 1,663.4043

Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad


10.0 Vegetation


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Equipment Type tons/yr MT/yr

Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes

0.1578 0.1578 0.0000 750.1272 750.1272 0.2426 0.0000 755.2220

Total 0.1578 0.1578 0.0000 750.1272 750.1272 0.2426 0.0000 755.2220

UnMitigated/Mitigated

Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 14 4.00 365 200 0.39 Diesel




APPENDIX 3.2:

EMFAC 2014 MODEL OUTPUTS

calendar_year season_month sub_area vehicle_class pollutant gallons2018 Annual Alpine (GBV) LDA Fuel 3518.2796632018 Annual Inyo (GBV) LDA Fuel 32154.638922018 Annual Mono (GBV) LDA Fuel 16807.716132018 Annual Lake (LC) LDA Fuel 27868.809452018 Annual El Dorado (LT) LDA Fuel 8217.7650892018 Annual Placer (LT) LDA Fuel 6614.2979582018 Annual Amador (MC) LDA Fuel 21591.841692018 Annual Calaveras (MC) LDA Fuel 19926.877642018 Annual El Dorado (MC) LDA Fuel 70023.063212018 Annual Mariposa (MC) LDA Fuel 9552.5773992018 Annual Nevada (MC) LDA Fuel 45406.358062018 Annual Placer (MC) LDA Fuel 43902.488322018 Annual Plumas (MC) LDA Fuel 12926.656222018 Annual Sierra (MC) LDA Fuel 5509.8916952018 Annual Tuolumne (MC) LDA Fuel 19012.1662018 Annual Monterey (NCC) LDA Fuel 200968.05852018 Annual San Benito (NCC) LDA Fuel 31424.966932018 Annual Santa Cruz (NCC) LDA Fuel 84783.904332018 Annual Del Norte (NC) LDA Fuel 12323.319232018 Annual Humboldt (NC) LDA Fuel 54268.367492018 Annual Mendocino (NC) LDA Fuel 50017.754322018 Annual Sonoma (NC) LDA Fuel 40072.753842018 Annual Trinity (NC) LDA Fuel 11493.733052018 Annual Lassen (NEP) LDA Fuel 20033.921012018 Annual Modoc (NEP) LDA Fuel 8081.6181042018 Annual Siskiyou (NEP) LDA Fuel 56729.040442018 Annual Butte (SV) LDA Fuel 69463.465252018 Annual Colusa (SV) LDA Fuel 38853.611452018 Annual Glenn (SV) LDA Fuel 30510.458282018 Annual Placer (SV) LDA Fuel 103775.90622018 Annual Sacramento (SV) LDA Fuel 717904.90112018 Annual Shasta (SV) LDA Fuel 105613.69362018 Annual Solano (SV) LDA Fuel 119028.06182018 Annual Sutter (SV) LDA Fuel 41814.505232018 Annual Tehama (SV) LDA Fuel 60622.563572018 Annual Yolo (SV) LDA Fuel 114583.8342018 Annual Yuba (SV) LDA Fuel 35536.123462018 Annual San Diego (SD) LDA Fuel 1713229.7622018 Annual Alameda (SF) LDA Fuel 833022.73292018 Annual Contra Costa (SF) LDA Fuel 495343.07462018 Annual Marin (SF) LDA Fuel 161689.9352018 Annual Napa (SF) LDA Fuel 59454.570782018 Annual San Francisco (SF) LDA Fuel 224580.68372018 Annual San Mateo (SF) LDA Fuel 317742.15822018 Annual Santa Clara (SF) LDA Fuel 968937.4442018 Annual Solano (SF) LDA Fuel 207001.5263

2018 Annual Sonoma (SF) LDA Fuel 142987.6132018 Annual Fresno (SJV) LDA Fuel 285647.41782018 Annual Kern (SJV) LDA Fuel 441733.34082018 Annual Kings (SJV) LDA Fuel 76677.876212018 Annual Madera (SJV) LDA Fuel 101134.94422018 Annual Merced (SJV) LDA Fuel 153966.65552018 Annual San Joaquin (SJV) LDA Fuel 424471.4292018 Annual Stanislaus (SJV) LDA Fuel 192927.90932018 Annual Tulare (SJV) LDA Fuel 163230.16542018 Annual San Luis Obispo (SCC) LDA Fuel 157304.40342018 Annual Santa Barbara (SCC) LDA Fuel 196309.08992018 Annual Ventura (SCC) LDA Fuel 381975.75482018 Annual Los Angeles (SC) LDA Fuel 4919412.6052018 Annual Orange (SC) LDA Fuel 1577579.892018 Annual Riverside (SC) LDA Fuel 772056.47622018 Annual San Bernardino (SC) LDA Fuel 742772.58462018 Annual Imperial (SS) LDA Fuel 105557.62712018 Annual Riverside (SS) LDA Fuel 185694.62672018 Annual Kern (MD) LDA Fuel 84705.42492018 Annual Riverside (MD/MDAQMD) LDA Fuel 26469.781862018 Annual Riverside (MD/SCAQMD) LDA Fuel 26412.209842018 Annual Los Angeles (MD) LDA Fuel 135419.22182018 Annual San Bernardino (MD) LDA Fuel 491510.4237

TOTAL 19,117,897.35MPG 27.14

2018 Annual Alpine (GBV) LHDT1 Fuel 532.97275322018 Annual Inyo (GBV) LHDT1 Fuel 5250.540522018 Annual Mono (GBV) LHDT1 Fuel 2909.1765342018 Annual Lake (LC) LHDT1 Fuel 6661.7456512018 Annual El Dorado (LT) LHDT1 Fuel 2184.1514722018 Annual Placer (LT) LHDT1 Fuel 1753.2613382018 Annual Amador (MC) LHDT1 Fuel 6185.553362018 Annual Calaveras (MC) LHDT1 Fuel 5433.229772018 Annual El Dorado (MC) LHDT1 Fuel 12245.617512018 Annual Mariposa (MC) LHDT1 Fuel 2530.3118292018 Annual Nevada (MC) LHDT1 Fuel 12080.816372018 Annual Placer (MC) LHDT1 Fuel 5667.45382018 Annual Plumas (MC) LHDT1 Fuel 3848.508422018 Annual Sierra (MC) LHDT1 Fuel 964.24676062018 Annual Tuolumne (MC) LHDT1 Fuel 6092.6691062018 Annual Monterey (NCC) LHDT1 Fuel 23460.286862018 Annual San Benito (NCC) LHDT1 Fuel 4647.08022018 Annual Santa Cruz (NCC) LHDT1 Fuel 10091.932042018 Annual Del Norte (NC) LHDT1 Fuel 2818.5711872018 Annual Humboldt (NC) LHDT1 Fuel 14500.89682018 Annual Mendocino (NC) LHDT1 Fuel 12408.17308

2018 Annual Sonoma (NC) LHDT1 Fuel 5993.1861322018 Annual Trinity (NC) LHDT1 Fuel 2685.5964542018 Annual Lassen (NEP) LHDT1 Fuel 6133.053012018 Annual Modoc (NEP) LHDT1 Fuel 2255.2572882018 Annual Siskiyou (NEP) LHDT1 Fuel 10393.642222018 Annual Butte (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 13751.9172018 Annual Colusa (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 5578.5993332018 Annual Glenn (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 4907.7244162018 Annual Placer (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 14671.320812018 Annual Sacramento (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 75599.798352018 Annual Shasta (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 20719.953812018 Annual Solano (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 11581.165572018 Annual Sutter (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 8000.4758122018 Annual Tehama (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 10090.279462018 Annual Yolo (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 16316.582042018 Annual Yuba (SV) LHDT1 Fuel 5266.5493822018 Annual San Diego (SD) LHDT1 Fuel 125262.13842018 Annual Alameda (SF) LHDT1 Fuel 66009.164792018 Annual Contra Costa (SF) LHDT1 Fuel 40394.472582018 Annual Marin (SF) LHDT1 Fuel 12611.147922018 Annual Napa (SF) LHDT1 Fuel 7636.761542018 Annual San Francisco (SF) LHDT1 Fuel 13695.333812018 Annual San Mateo (SF) LHDT1 Fuel 27619.057862018 Annual Santa Clara (SF) LHDT1 Fuel 65558.376992018 Annual Solano (SF) LHDT1 Fuel 17555.185232018 Annual Sonoma (SF) LHDT1 Fuel 19692.881452018 Annual Fresno (SJV) LHDT1 Fuel 29937.729392018 Annual Kern (SJV) LHDT1 Fuel 48706.303932018 Annual Kings (SJV) LHDT1 Fuel 9418.6404462018 Annual Madera (SJV) LHDT1 Fuel 12393.445922018 Annual Merced (SJV) LHDT1 Fuel 17322.384192018 Annual San Joaquin (SJV) LHDT1 Fuel 42315.663082018 Annual Stanislaus (SJV) LHDT1 Fuel 26451.997952018 Annual Tulare (SJV) LHDT1 Fuel 21641.207422018 Annual San Luis Obispo (SCC) LHDT1 Fuel 24324.97232018 Annual Santa Barbara (SCC) LHDT1 Fuel 25156.883272018 Annual Ventura (SCC) LHDT1 Fuel 33387.835892018 Annual Los Angeles (SC) LHDT1 Fuel 302541.33172018 Annual Orange (SC) LHDT1 Fuel 105552.13742018 Annual Riverside (SC) LHDT1 Fuel 59109.032742018 Annual San Bernardino (SC) LHDT1 Fuel 53904.199162018 Annual Imperial (SS) LHDT1 Fuel 9275.6126332018 Annual Riverside (SS) LHDT1 Fuel 14105.688382018 Annual Kern (MD) LHDT1 Fuel 11953.553912018 Annual Riverside (MD/MDAQMD) LHDT1 Fuel 2850.5914722018 Annual Riverside (MD/SCAQMD) LHDT1 Fuel 2117.3120632018 Annual Los Angeles (MD) LHDT1 Fuel 8813.963102

2018 Annual San Bernardino (MD) LHDT1 Fuel 44102.01829TOTAL 1,657,629.32MPG 12.94

2018 Annual Alpine (GBV) MHDT Fuel 144.76470172018 Annual Inyo (GBV) MHDT Fuel 2005.568212018 Annual Mono (GBV) MHDT Fuel 1013.8814992018 Annual Lake (LC) MHDT Fuel 3430.0931142018 Annual El Dorado (LT) MHDT Fuel 1248.0902862018 Annual Placer (LT) MHDT Fuel 1122.1655542018 Annual Amador (MC) MHDT Fuel 3955.8966722018 Annual Calaveras (MC) MHDT Fuel 2842.1930882018 Annual El Dorado (MC) MHDT Fuel 6846.0257392018 Annual Mariposa (MC) MHDT Fuel 815.96096232018 Annual Nevada (MC) MHDT Fuel 5394.2469532018 Annual Placer (MC) MHDT Fuel 2138.4101062018 Annual Plumas (MC) MHDT Fuel 1427.7164182018 Annual Sierra (MC) MHDT Fuel 256.47476382018 Annual Tuolumne (MC) MHDT Fuel 2526.9609542018 Annual Monterey (NCC) MHDT Fuel 22903.734462018 Annual San Benito (NCC) MHDT Fuel 3015.7190492018 Annual Santa Cruz (NCC) MHDT Fuel 11007.854472018 Annual Del Norte (NC) MHDT Fuel 736.39615792018 Annual Humboldt (NC) MHDT Fuel 6338.4775492018 Annual Mendocino (NC) MHDT Fuel 6590.0013812018 Annual Sonoma (NC) MHDT Fuel 3987.1081662018 Annual Trinity (NC) MHDT Fuel 648.33934972018 Annual Lassen (NEP) MHDT Fuel 1578.36552018 Annual Modoc (NEP) MHDT Fuel 774.97460582018 Annual Siskiyou (NEP) MHDT Fuel 3449.198242018 Annual Butte (SV) MHDT Fuel 9239.9625692018 Annual Colusa (SV) MHDT Fuel 2520.6148922018 Annual Glenn (SV) MHDT Fuel 2247.3007562018 Annual Placer (SV) MHDT Fuel 24736.213292018 Annual Sacramento (SV) MHDT Fuel 85705.448122018 Annual Shasta (SV) MHDT Fuel 10120.988382018 Annual Solano (SV) MHDT Fuel 5170.071122018 Annual Sutter (SV) MHDT Fuel 8916.2691152018 Annual Tehama (SV) MHDT Fuel 3599.6857732018 Annual Yolo (SV) MHDT Fuel 38585.031012018 Annual Yuba (SV) MHDT Fuel 2010.5165752018 Annual San Diego (SD) MHDT Fuel 150813.96162018 Annual Alameda (SF) MHDT Fuel 111813.64582018 Annual Contra Costa (SF) MHDT Fuel 33077.438082018 Annual Marin (SF) MHDT Fuel 10095.918862018 Annual Napa (SF) MHDT Fuel 7468.1898482018 Annual San Francisco (SF) MHDT Fuel 30533.38685

2018 Annual San Mateo (SF) MHDT Fuel 45277.642782018 Annual Santa Clara (SF) MHDT Fuel 71439.945982018 Annual Solano (SF) MHDT Fuel 14366.978532018 Annual Sonoma (SF) MHDT Fuel 26949.442272018 Annual Fresno (SJV) MHDT Fuel 66739.168692018 Annual Kern (SJV) MHDT Fuel 73223.600312018 Annual Kings (SJV) MHDT Fuel 7286.7908992018 Annual Madera (SJV) MHDT Fuel 9801.7817132018 Annual Merced (SJV) MHDT Fuel 17491.707922018 Annual San Joaquin (SJV) MHDT Fuel 43234.715682018 Annual Stanislaus (SJV) MHDT Fuel 35172.463982018 Annual Tulare (SJV) MHDT Fuel 25263.621352018 Annual San Luis Obispo (SCC) MHDT Fuel 14366.453142018 Annual Santa Barbara (SCC) MHDT Fuel 23665.272018 Annual Ventura (SCC) MHDT Fuel 40920.784152018 Annual Los Angeles (SC) MHDT Fuel 516377.72532018 Annual Orange (SC) MHDT Fuel 224366.60162018 Annual Riverside (SC) MHDT Fuel 73139.349652018 Annual San Bernardino (SC) MHDT Fuel 97383.584872018 Annual Imperial (SS) MHDT Fuel 12527.484222018 Annual Riverside (SS) MHDT Fuel 26051.485172018 Annual Kern (MD) MHDT Fuel 7403.9004662018 Annual Riverside (MD/MDAQMD) MHDT Fuel 1197.9260432018 Annual Riverside (MD/SCAQMD) MHDT Fuel 598.85355732018 Annual Los Angeles (MD) MHDT Fuel 12184.258832018 Annual San Bernardino (MD) MHDT Fuel 25016.17885

TOTAL 2,144,300.98MPG 8.17

2018 Annual Alpine (GBV) HHDT Fuel 2099.9401482018 Annual Inyo (GBV) HHDT Fuel 12647.889792018 Annual Mono (GBV) HHDT Fuel 9036.8884892018 Annual Lake (LC) HHDT Fuel 5369.2089362018 Annual El Dorado (LT) HHDT Fuel 2766.3302142018 Annual Placer (LT) HHDT Fuel 1135.807042018 Annual Amador (MC) HHDT Fuel 3437.7422272018 Annual Calaveras (MC) HHDT Fuel 5228.8558112018 Annual El Dorado (MC) HHDT Fuel 4659.0175782018 Annual Mariposa (MC) HHDT Fuel 638.32716492018 Annual Nevada (MC) HHDT Fuel 33983.597892018 Annual Placer (MC) HHDT Fuel 40807.412092018 Annual Plumas (MC) HHDT Fuel 3338.8739022018 Annual Sierra (MC) HHDT Fuel 464.91090532018 Annual Tuolumne (MC) HHDT Fuel 2572.4056622018 Annual Monterey (NCC) HHDT Fuel 44885.798562018 Annual San Benito (NCC) HHDT Fuel 48118.527282018 Annual Santa Cruz (NCC) HHDT Fuel 8912.808119

2018 Annual Del Norte (NC) HHDT Fuel 977.64452982018 Annual Humboldt (NC) HHDT Fuel 25565.827112018 Annual Mendocino (NC) HHDT Fuel 33982.677572018 Annual Sonoma (NC) HHDT Fuel 8915.4584832018 Annual Trinity (NC) HHDT Fuel 9908.456982018 Annual Lassen (NEP) HHDT Fuel 1901.8752922018 Annual Modoc (NEP) HHDT Fuel 1166.6291572018 Annual Siskiyou (NEP) HHDT Fuel 57884.267752018 Annual Butte (SV) HHDT Fuel 51880.648592018 Annual Colusa (SV) HHDT Fuel 22734.606342018 Annual Glenn (SV) HHDT Fuel 18391.545562018 Annual Placer (SV) HHDT Fuel 28442.330862018 Annual Sacramento (SV) HHDT Fuel 140002.51552018 Annual Shasta (SV) HHDT Fuel 87906.642142018 Annual Solano (SV) HHDT Fuel 62807.853742018 Annual Sutter (SV) HHDT Fuel 48642.589422018 Annual Tehama (SV) HHDT Fuel 60971.083812018 Annual Yolo (SV) HHDT Fuel 44799.398852018 Annual Yuba (SV) HHDT Fuel 4759.9637092018 Annual San Diego (SD) HHDT Fuel 321493.51532018 Annual Alameda (SF) HHDT Fuel 300330.2352018 Annual Contra Costa (SF) HHDT Fuel 97300.31832018 Annual Marin (SF) HHDT Fuel 14364.530692018 Annual Napa (SF) HHDT Fuel 19283.25032018 Annual San Francisco (SF) HHDT Fuel 17915.013912018 Annual San Mateo (SF) HHDT Fuel 23291.506642018 Annual Santa Clara (SF) HHDT Fuel 161356.9552018 Annual Solano (SF) HHDT Fuel 45745.807152018 Annual Sonoma (SF) HHDT Fuel 31931.674122018 Annual Fresno (SJV) HHDT Fuel 351569.08242018 Annual Kern (SJV) HHDT Fuel 602625.22982018 Annual Kings (SJV) HHDT Fuel 122187.63622018 Annual Madera (SJV) HHDT Fuel 87997.868752018 Annual Merced (SJV) HHDT Fuel 222165.35742018 Annual San Joaquin (SJV) HHDT Fuel 198532.16932018 Annual Stanislaus (SJV) HHDT Fuel 147534.32612018 Annual Tulare (SJV) HHDT Fuel 125152.90372018 Annual San Luis Obispo (SCC) HHDT Fuel 29352.067692018 Annual Santa Barbara (SCC) HHDT Fuel 36146.005082018 Annual Ventura (SCC) HHDT Fuel 56699.763482018 Annual Los Angeles (SC) HHDT Fuel 1142920.2872018 Annual Orange (SC) HHDT Fuel 220041.55042018 Annual Riverside (SC) HHDT Fuel 288758.77192018 Annual San Bernardino (SC) HHDT Fuel 288167.43712018 Annual Imperial (SS) HHDT Fuel 110184.24642018 Annual Riverside (SS) HHDT Fuel 175673.5772018 Annual Kern (MD) HHDT Fuel 120687.1114

2018 Annual Riverside (MD/MDAQMD) HHDT Fuel 51803.19882018 Annual Riverside (MD/SCAQMD) HHDT Fuel 54251.483312018 Annual Los Angeles (MD) HHDT Fuel 35325.591252018 Annual San Bernardino (MD) HHDT Fuel 329595.2378

TOTAL 6,772,130.07MPG 5.77

vmt104681.486

866532.2088469943.9839

752777.295217555.8911188010.7875661660.3611554753.74481957414.593256578.72681313819.6371269422.336325587.2833

134540.325506109.40165207463.383924931.83092274046.097324777.58451519050.0121424521.158977933.3759261601.2899519986.3325188633.93781428641.9451895928.431

1098143.28830740.9922

2981089.1319814779.662850319.4373065369.486

1237368.961654948.9563161117.1581016780.94446265729.7122930529.48

13819057.54463936.28

1707053.6435762823.94

9242810.52227690368.985730438.194

3981153.4568083871.09511477782.292203405.7492666794.6884162113.914

11748608.25141796.8394670405.2444607247.7555901854.12710774281.83125805808.343583063.9622269548.1220466933.822999339.7155119695.9132420901.812721901.4163686759.34523576505.25613934982.11

518,855,064.69

6421.61325765402.28149

36139.649383797.5888

26045.3716321852.3082980823.1271671602.45878160382.862632705.98432156500.892572935.6622550081.9915212364.3599278788.72843284794.531159956.04089120517.625437737.92244196029.4477162916.6657

77093.0480335146.8051479122.7982529509.65346137199.2966183572.228473487.3490766146.56496188991.5026916408.0415279086.6115145791.2235108034.2341

138153.202208154.078270665.439241553857.297783433.0068490891.5339

153324.99695057.90711

156811.125335591.7586779422.9768

215265.959247340.2122370264.7502610167.4767120606.4946158661.7236221953.3337526820.5945338771.6059278809.5815310056.0994298825.7139

466952.1794051314.2311456788.186834750.2259

743470.435134188.521

192789.1355154026.779840173.2344529169.87899127171.1619

614067.979321,445,155.28

1044.964514985.160747560.89622526773.766959911.9775648653.17608731218.2734922502.1885854408.552016128.52908242472.6187216002.7996711072.349041888.61875819935.59662179489.272323538.1069587419.774485645.96712249504.9212351295.6364330876.203724947.72017412189.593045896.48709126200.1384473498.5190518987.5814617309.34092201551.4668666095.020979247.5410138783.3276672028.6789728034.09426313941.738515757.667121195274.667896403.1263261005.742878225.5368559282.53322

242254.065

360685.3811565849.8934112503.2221218084.5446537407.5675

583878.79357141.8805676491.48527137274.2012342420.0323282418.2619201835.6599113283.3163185704.8177353005.97844232727.4921895353.787663539.0032836028.0963

113441.295235867.188658184.0950410782.942825200.064379102254.5048228400.5673

17,519,008.01

12263.786273379.9480452516.2143530222.0353315742.50675

6156.3564317467.4527728248.5146222821.804093068.398093195919.7788

239261.48817908.354252488.56080612877.29104249460.6417282814.267846479.27158

5012.412049144279.1614194457.980549846.9037757576.5836610014.526186304.438519338639.7977298850.2718132516.1902106760.3338156503.9453

754561.278510235.6722

366151.947279590.5375357523.8332244885.075725724.396951778724.5891696663.658548982.441277652.94612106977.637680179.33229

112071.283903310.9023260900.5722171249.66982039653.3343539850.463716631.7413512896.60881298647.3491148380.438854220.4656722339.7235159826.4335191355.4694

321265.5766315855.8481207126.6581755504.5851634739.075698042.06111113174.226709005.7538

337900.1812355708.823

204958.16892121231.883

39,043,559.85

Documents

Watson Industrial Park - CivicLivecityofchino.hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10382578/… · Watson Industrial Park Energy Analysis 09646-03 Energy Analysis Report