45
1 UAE Chemical Society Forum 28th May By: Iftikhar Ahmed Ph.D. (Paris ) Proj. Mngt. (Oxford) X-Asst. Professor (Univ. Paris ) UN-Consultant (Environment) Research fellow /Lecturer Chemical and Environmental Engineering Masdar Institute of technology UAE : Iftikhar@ live.fr [email protected] Water treatment & water recovery technologies.

Water treatment & water recovery technologies - LUMS Daher (MS ) Noshad (MS) Achen University Germany Trevi Systems USA Masdar Institute UAE Merci . 45 Iftikhar ... Slide 1 Author:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

UAE Chemical Society Forum 28th May

By:

Iftikhar Ahmed Ph.D. (Paris )

Proj. Mngt. (Oxford)

X-Asst. Professor (Univ. Paris )

UN-Consultant (Environment)

Research fellow /Lecturer

Chemical and Environmental Engineering

Masdar Institute of technology

UAE :

Iftikhar@ live.fr [email protected]

Water treatment & water recovery

technologies.

2

Key points

Introduction to statement

Water Desalination (RO vs FO)

Water reuse

Graphene Membranes

Graphene synthesis

Prospective work

3

Membrane Technology.

o Water treatment: FO, RO and MD desalination

o Wastewater treatment: MBRs, SMEBR

o Membrane fabrication (RO, FO and MD).

Electrokinetics.

o Electrochemical bacterial stimulation and/or disinfection-

inactivation

o Solid waste treatment (removal of toxic heavy metals) sludge to

fertiliser

Photocatalysis and solar cell

o Porphyrin –POM hybrid films

o Porphyrin based organic solar cell.

Nanotechnology

o Catalytic nanotubes on (Steel , Iron, Titanium surfaces)

o Graphene from petroleum waste

Research Themes

4

Increasing energy demand and population growth

4.95 % yearly energy demand growth

2.26 % population growth

10 % annual growth in waste discharge

Depleting natural resources

Increasing Wastewater treatment cost

Introduction

5

but world is facing

Energy of 10 minutes of sunshine on the planet Earth is equal to the

total yearly human energy consumption.

1 m2 area is sufficient to power a small town

The real exist in application of technology

Energy gap

Energy cost

Waste treatment

cost.

Introduction

6

SOLUTION :

Solar nanotechnologies for energy and water applications

Alternative energy production

Pure water recovery

Precious metal recovery

waste to energy

Optimum route :

Zero energy input = Zero waste out

Introduction

7

About 98% of water in the world cannot be use directly due to the water salinity

Introduction

UAE

17%

KSA

18%

USA

18%

OMAN

1%

BAHRIN

1%

SPAIN

8%

KUWAIT

7%

QATAR

3%

OTHERS

27%

UAE Desalination Share In the World 2010

7

Introduction

Introduction

8

Sources of water consumed in UAE

Source: Environmental Agency Abu Dhabi,

2014

INTRODUCTION

Sources of water consumed

in Abu Dhabi

Source: WaterWorld, 2014

Introduction

9

UNITED ARAB EMIRATE

DESALINATION CAPACITY & POPULATION

9

Introduction

10 3/18/2016

10

United arab Emirate

Desalination capacity

-population

Introduction Introduction

11 3/18/2016

11

Pure water

by

desalination:

12

Energy cost

Operational cost

Challenges

13 Friday, March 18, 2016

Introduction

14

Multi Anodes and Cathodes (A-C-C-A) Cylindrical

14

SET UP

Pretreatment to Sea water reverse osmosis (SWRO)

To reduce biofouling

(microbiological, phosphorus

content) and inorganic fouling

(Ca, Mg, SO4)

To minimize energy

consumption in SWRO

desalination plant

I.Ahmed et al.Desalination 2015 (submitted)

15

16700

300 0 0 0 0 0 2500

0 200 0

4000

8000

12000

16000

20000

CF

U/m

L

15

% REMOVAL OF TOTAL BACTERIA COUNT (TBC)

Before EC treatment After EC treatment

I.Ahmed et al.Desalination 2015

(submitted)

Electrochemical inhibition of biofouling

16

91% removal of Mg+2

44% removal of Ca+2

79% removal of SO4

-2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Magnesium Calcium sulfate

Avg. % removal at

CD=0.05mA/cm2

Avg. % removal at

CD=0.1mA/cm2

Avg. % removal at

CD=0.200mA/cm2

16

SWRO - INORGANIC FOULING

% REMOVAL AT DIFFERENT CURRENT DENSITY

FOR CYLINDRICAL

I.Ahmed et al.Desalination 2015 (submitted)

17

Hydraulic Pressure driven technology

(Reverse osmosis)

Forward vs Reverse

Osmosis

18

Forward osmosis and NF/RO/MD

Introduction

19

SELECTION OF FORWARD OSMOSIS

o Efficient Process

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 804

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Wate

r F

lux, l/m

2-h

r

Elapsed Time, hr

FO

RO

Forward Osmosis vs. Reverse Osmosis

Technology time line : High research flux :

20

FORWARD OSMOSIS :

STRUCTURE AND WORKING:

Forward Osmosis mimics

water transport by plants,

when fresh water is drawn by

osmotic pressure into the

plant through its roots in the

soil.

21 3/18/2016 21

By varying several operating conditions:

Feed/draw water flow rate,

Temperature,

Membrane orientation,

Draw/feed solution concentrations

Parameters of concern:

water flux (Jw),

salt flux (Js),

salt rejection (R).

Optimization of forward osmosis (FO) membranes

22 3/18/2016

22

Membrane fabrication

Enhanced

Hydrophilic FO

membranes

Nanocomposites of

SiO2 and

functionalized CNT,

Graphene with PBI

1) Increase membrane hydrophilicty

2) Improve membrane strength and

durability

3) Homogenous membranes with

relatively even distribution of

silica nanoparticles Experiemtnal Reference Composition

PBI-S0 21 wt. % PBI (in DMAC)

0 wt. % silica

PBI-S0.5 21 wt. % PBI (in DMAC)

0.5 wt. % silica

PBI-S3 21 wt. % PBI (in DMAC)

3 wt. % silica

o Membrane functionalization

o Forward Osmosis )

23

1) Increase membrane hydrophilicty

2) Improve membrane strength and

durability

3) Homogenous membranes with relatively

even distribution of silica nanoparticles

Optimization of forward osmosis (FO) membranes

Membrane Contact angle

S0 60.7 ± 6.9

S0.5 43.7 ± 9.3

S3 50.7 ± 9.9

SEM images of cross section at high magnification (a) PBI-S0 (b) PBI-S0.5 (c) PBI- S3

24 3/18/2016

24

Membrane fabrication

Enhanced Hydrophilic FO membranes

Nanocomposites of SiO2 and

functionalized CNT, Functionalized

Graphene with PBI

o For (FO and MD)

59.31666667

88.86666667

S1 S0

Salt

Rej

ecti

on

(%

)

Figure : S0 SEM cross sectional images

25 3/18/2016

25

Optimization of forward osmosis (FO) membranes

1.55

1.95

S1 S0

Wat

er

Flu

x ((

LMH

)

27

MEBR Pilot scale plant @Masdar

Electrochemistry for water technology

Fig. Solar photovoltaic response systems (left) SMEBR installed at Masdar (RHS)

28

Electro kinetic Mechanism:

Electromigration

Electrolysis

Electro osmosis

Electrocoagulation

Aggregation

Flocculation

Electro flocculation: co-aggelomerate into millimeter size

particles (floccs ) can be filtered out by common

filtration.

High removal and short time of the

process. Heavy metals removed or

reclaimed by, e.g., adsorption,

pumping , precipitation or ion-

selective membrane I. Ahmed et al. J. of Environment Management 2015

29 Friday, March 18, 2016

Quality of product water :

30 Friday, March 18, 2016

Membrane free ( EBR ) ElectroBioreactor :

Water and fertilizer recovery from biosolids slurry.

Waste to value

Sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plants

contains nutrients essential for plant growth such as

o Nitrogen,

o Phosphorus

o potassium

o calcium, microelements

Can be reused in agriculture as fertilizer or soil

conditioner without treatment , after composting or

after intensive aerobic bioconversion

1. Chemical extraction

2. Bioleaching treatment

3.Biosorption

4. Electro kinetic

31

BIOSOLID GENERATION IN

THE EMIRATE OF ABU DHABI

PROFITABLE?

ton

s o

f d

ry s

oli

ds

pe

r year

32

INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES

• Many countries do not make beneficial use of biosolids

But a growing number of countries do, for example …….

INTRODUCTION - MOTIVATION

70%

Japan

90%

Norway Australia by Sydney Water only

Netherlands by Water Board Rijn &

Ijssel

55%

USA

beneficial reuse

33 Friday, March 18, 2016

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Cu removal

Heavy metal removal from slurry

34

2500

1548

1330 1121

577

300 237 93

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n (

pp

m)

Zn removal

Heavy metal removal from sludge

35 Friday, March 18, 2016

Microbial methane cell :

Microbial electro-stimulation

organic waste to bioenergy :

36

Small graphene oxide (GO) flakes are

laid on a polyamide fibre substrate.

Hydroxylated nanopores

generated

GO: Graphene Oxide

Reduce Energy cost

Brackish =80%

Seawater = 97%

37

Graphene oxide functionalization of membranes

Abu dhabi National Oil refinery

research center (TAKREER )Award

for best Research presentation 12-Feb.2016

Water flux enhanced by GO coating on PVDF Membrane

Save 97% energy

as compared to RO

38

A projected market growth up to $ 675.1

till 2020 at an Annual Growth Rate

(CAGR) of 58.7% within next 3years

period of 5 years.

Projected production of graphene by 2017

is 573 Tonnes Compared to 28 tonnes in

2010 .

State of the art and market :

Graphene synthesis and application

39

Photocatalytic nanotubes on steel, Cu, Ti etc

Prospective

40

Solar energy production –

Photoactive nanocatalyst

films: Plastic solar cell

(DSSC)

Solar powered electric car system

PV-Electrochemical

Metal removal

Previous

41

16- 4+

+

Au, Ag,

Co, Cu,

Pd

Ag

Au (visible)

hn

solar OPV , Solar Catalysis Water , Energy

Dual application : multilayer films

solar cell and photocatalysis

Porphyrin-Polyoxometalte =Donor acceptor assemblies

Previous

42

I. Ahmed et al. New J chem. 2011

Multilayers Assembly and Nanostructures by

photocatalysis

Au nano sheet

Ag Nano wires

.Multitudes 60-80nm (30 to40 Unit thickness)

•.Growth ,horizontal or Vertical ?

•Cation Ag+ smaller & repelled more

•Anions AuCl4 , Large

aerated conc 8X, [ Ag]

6.4 x 10-4 mol.L-1

I. Ahmed et al. App Catalysis 2012

43 3/18/2016

43

Forward Osmosis vs Reverse Osmosis.

PV Electrocoagulation systems study and mechanism for

seawater RO and wastewater reuse.

Zero pollution: Zero waste technology under test: Complete

recycling of wastewater /slurry into pure water and fertilizer

sludge.

Ion capturing material extract from waste.

Graphene synthesis and application.

Solar photoctalytic systems for metal recovery (Silver,

Copper , Gold ) from water .

Conclusions

44 3/18/2016

44

Acknowledgement

A.Giwa PhD student

Amna Al Hossaini (MS)

Elham Abdul Karem (MS)

Virginie Dufour (RE)

Saher Daher (MS )

Noshad (MS)

Achen University Germany

Trevi Systems USA

Masdar Institute UAE

Merci

45

Iftikhar Ahmed Ph.D (Paris)

Proj. Mngt.(Oxford)

X-Asst. Professor (Univ. Paris)

UN-Consultant (Environment)

Research fellow/Lecturer

Iftikhar@ live.fr [email protected]