38
WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR FOR BRANCHED RIVER SYSTEMS BRANCHED RIVER SYSTEMS

WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR BRANCHED RIVER SYSTEMS

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR BRANCHED RIVER SYSTEMS
  • Slide 2
  • 1-Dimensional, Time Dependent 1-Dimensional, Time Dependent Advection only Daily or Hourly Simulations Energy Budget Method Mixed Lagrangian-Eulerian solution technique Reverse Particle Tracking Mixed Lagrangian-Eulerian solution technique Reverse Particle Tracking Reduces error due to numerical dispersion Reduces problems of numerical instability Scaleable in time and space FORTRAN (plain vanilla) FORTRAN (plain vanilla) RBM10 Model
  • Slide 3
  • dT dt = q surf A r C p + e CHANGE IN ENERGY SURFACE ENERGY EXCHANGE ONE-DIMENSIONAL ENERGY BUDGET MATHEMATICAL MODEL MODEL ERROR
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • REVERSE PARTICLE TRACKING
  • Slide 6
  • Elements of RBM10 Framework Boundaries of Simulated System Boundaries of Simulated System System Topology System Topology Geometry/Hydrodynamics Geometry/Hydrodynamics Boundary Inputs (Flow and Temperature) Boundary Inputs (Flow and Temperature) Heat Budget Inputs based on Meteorology Heat Budget Inputs based on Meteorology
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Dworshak
  • Slide 9
  • Geometry/Hydrodynamics Mainstem Geometry for Impounded Reaches Mainstem Geometry for Impounded Reaches - Storage reservoirs with variable elevation - Volume-elevation relationships are used to vary geometry of model elements Velocity Velocity -Continuity: V = Flow / X-Area
  • Slide 10
  • Geometry/Hydrodynamics Mainstem Geometry for Free-Flowing Reaches Varies Depending on Flow Mainstem Geometry for Free-Flowing Reaches Varies Depending on Flow Need cross-sectional profiles of the river bottom Open channel hydraulics relationships HEC-RAS model gradually varied flow is assumed gradually varied flow is assumed provides cross-sectional area and top width over the range of observed flows provides cross-sectional area and top width over the range of observed flows area used to estimate velocity, width used to estimate surface area for heat exchange area used to estimate velocity, width used to estimate surface area for heat exchange
  • Slide 11
  • Meteorological Data Needed to Compute Heat Budget Air Temperature Dew Point Wind Speed Atmospheric Pressure Cloud Cover
  • Slide 12
  • Issues Issues Mainstem Temperature Monitoring Monitoring at Dams Not Designed for Assessment of River Temperature Monitoring at Dams Not Designed for Assessment of River Temperature Limited Quality Control/Quality Assurance Limited Quality Control/Quality Assurance Tributary Temperature Monitoring Discontinuous Record Discontinuous Record Unknown Quality Control/Quality Assurance Unknown Quality Control/Quality Assurance Meteorology Limited Geographical Coverage Limited Geographical Coverage Data Limitations
  • Slide 13
  • SOME SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY
  • Slide 14
  • Meteorology Meteorology Described by five regional weather stations Mainstem Flow Mainstem Flow Leopold equations developed from gradually-varied flow methods for un-impounded reaches Tributary Temperatures Tributary Temperatures Non-linear regressions developed from local air temperature and weekly/monthly river temperatures Numerical Scheme Some numerical dispersion Some numerical dispersion Conservation of mass/energy (?) Conservation of mass/energy (?)
  • Slide 15
  • PARAMETER ESTIMATION
  • Slide 16
  • Parameters Parameters evaporation rates assignment of area covered by 5 meteorological stations Model uncertainty PARAMETER ESTIMATION
  • Slide 17
  • MODEL EVALUATION AND TESTING
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Columbia River Statistics (1995-1999)) Mean Difference Standard Deviation Location Snake @ Ice Harbor -0.18 1.07 Columbia @ Bonneville -0.391.33
  • Slide 22
  • Mean Difference Standard Deviation Location Fraser River @ Hells Gate -0.02 0.49 Fraser River Statistics (1998)
  • Slide 23
  • SOME APPLICATION OUTSIDE THE ENVELOPE
  • Slide 24
  • DISPERSI VE
  • Slide 25
  • TWO-DIMENSIONAL
  • Slide 26
  • MODEL APPLICATION
  • Slide 27
  • Impact of Dams on Natural Condition Two scenarios are run using identical boundary inputs (weather, tributary flows/temperatures, etc.) Two scenarios are run using identical boundary inputs (weather, tributary flows/temperatures, etc.) 1. Existing Condition 2. Un-impounded Condition Dams are mathematically removed altered geometry Dams are mathematically removed altered geometry Corroboration not feasible no observations Corroboration not feasible no observations Un-impounded Condition is not the natural condition model domain does not reach to headwaters Un-impounded Condition is not the natural condition model domain does not reach to headwaters
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Impact of Individual Dams on Daily Cross Sectional Average Temperature in the Columbia River
  • Slide 31
  • PREDICTED AND OBSERVED TEMPERATURES IN THE SNAKE AND COLUMBIA RIVERS USING METEOROLOGY GENERATED FOR VIC
  • Slide 32
  • Slide 33
  • Slide 34
  • SIMULATED TEMPERATURES IN THE SNAKE AND COLUMBIA RIVERS FOR THREE CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS
  • Slide 35
  • Slide 36
  • Slide 37
  • The End
  • Slide 38
  • Impact of Point Sources on Mainstem Temperatures Simulated Increases in Temperature at River Mile 42 in the Columbia River due to the Existing Point Sources