WATER SUPPLY STUDY · 2017. 6. 29. · WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY Chapter: Registration 2 Investor: UNDP BIH / MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE Water Supply Study

WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY

Chapter: Registration 1

INVESTOR:

MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC

GOVERNANCE OF WATER ACCESS

AUGUST 2011

PROJECT: WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR PARTNER MUNICIPALITIES




Investor:

UNDP BIH / MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC

GOVERNANCE

Water Supply Study

FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY

Project Team Responsibility for the project

UNDP BiH

Slobodan Tadić Program Manager UNDP/MDG-F DEG

Haris Fejzibegović Technical Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG

Amel Jakupović Financial Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG

Voding 92 doo

Nebojša Budović Project Manager

Andreas Stoisits Technical Expert

Alen Robović Financial Expert

Super

vis

ory

boar

d

Petrovo Municipality

Dr Zoran Blagojević Mayor

Draženka Maksimović Head of Department

Vukadin Blagojević Team member

Zoran Đuranović Team member

Water and Sewerage

Utility Company Petrovo

Boban Panić Managing Director

Mladen Vulić Team member

Other Associates

Vladimir Potparević Technical Expert

Branislav Erić Technical Expert

Zdravko Stevanović Technical Expert

Mirjana Blagovčanin Financial Expert

Željko Ivanović Financial Expert

Milutin Petrović GIS Expert

Bobana Pejčić Translator

Željka Ivanović Translator

Project Manager: Managing Director:

Nebojša Budović, Civ. Eng. Vladimir Potparević, Civ. Eng.

Engineering, Design and Consulting Company

Bijeljina



Water Supply Study

FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

1 REGISTRATION .............................................................................. 8

COMPANY LICENSE ....................................................................................... 9 COMPANY REGISTRATION ................................................................................ 9

2 MASTER PLAN ............................................................................. 10

2.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 11 2.1.1 INTRODUCTORY EXPLANATIONS .................................................................................... 11 2.1.2 GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION OF PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ......................................................... 11 2.1.3 POPULATION ......................................................................................................... 13 2.1.4 ECONOMY ............................................................................................................ 14 2.1.5 TOURISM ............................................................................................................. 15 2.1.6 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES .......................................................................... 16 2.1.7 WATER SUPPLYING OF POPULATION AND INDUSTRY IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY .............................. 18 2.1.8 BACKGROUNDS ....................................................................................................... 20

2.1.8.1 GEODETIC SURVEYING MAPS ................................................................................... 20 2.1.8.2 URBANISTIC BACKGROUNDS ................................................................................... 20 2.1.8.3 SPATIAL PLAN OF PETROVO MUNICIPALITY, 2008 ............................................................. 20 2.1.8.4 STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY, 2010 ....................................... 20

2.1.9 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION ......................................................................................... 20 2.1.10 OBJECTIVE AND ASSIGNMENT OF THE STUDY ................................................................... 21

2.1.10.1 ASSIGNMENT 1: INCEPTION REPORT INCLUDING ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT SITUATION .................. 21 2.1.10.2 ASSIGNMENT 2: WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN FOR PARTNER MUNICIPALITIES ............................ 22 2.1.10.3 ASSIGNMENT 3: PRIORITIZED PLAN OF INVESTMENT MEASURES FOR THE PERIOD OF 10 YEARS ............ 23 2.1.10.4 ASSIGNMENT 4: FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR PRIORITY INVESTMENT MEASURES .............................. 23

2.2 POPULATION AND SPATIAL COVERAGE ........................................................ 26 2.2.1 POPULATION ......................................................................................................... 26

2.2.1.1 POPULATION OF GIVEN AREA THROUGH HISTORY ............................................................. 26 2.2.1.1.1 PETROVO ............................................................................................................................................... 26 2.2.1.1.2 KAKMUŽ ............................................................................................................................................... 27 2.2.1.1.3 SOČKOVAC ............................................................................................................................................ 28 2.2.1.1.4 KARANOVAC ......................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.1.1.5 KRTOVA ................................................................................................................................................ 28 2.2.1.1.6 KALUĐERICA ......................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.1.1.7 PORJEČINA ............................................................................................................................................ 28

2.2.1.2 CURRENT POPULATION AND PROJECTED POPULATION ......................................................... 29 2.2.1.2.1 NATURAL AND MECHANICAL MOVEMENT ............................................................................................. 29 2.2.1.2.2 POPULATION PROJECTION ...................................................................................................................... 29

2.2.2 SPATIAL COVERAGE ................................................................................................. 31 2.3 EXISTING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS ........................................................... 32



2.3.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 32 2.3.2 HYDROLOGICAL RESOURCES OF PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ...................................................... 34

2.3.2.1 RUNNING WATERS .............................................................................................. 34 2.3.2.2 NATURAL SPRINGS ............................................................................................. 34 2.3.2.3 CAPTURED NATURAL SPRINGS ................................................................................. 34 2.3.2.4 PLANNED NEW SOURCES AND CAPACITY INCREASE OF THE EXISTING SOURCES ............................. 35 2.3.2.5 PLANNED NEW GROUNDWATER SOURCES ..................................................................... 36

2.3.3 PETROVO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM ................................................................................. 39 2.3.3.1 SOURCES ........................................................................................................ 39

2.3.3.1.1 KALUĐERICA I AND II ............................................................................................................................ 39 2.3.3.1.2 ŠPILJA ................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.3.3.1.3 SOURCES DJEDOVAC AND JAMA ............................................................................................................ 40

2.3.3.2 TRANSMISSION PIPELINES ...................................................................................... 40 2.3.3.2.1 TRANSMISSION PIPELINE, "ŠPILJA" SOURCE, KALUĐERICA COLLECTION BASIN ...................................... 40 2.3.3.2.2 TRANSMISSION PIPELINE, KALUĐERICA COLLECTION BASIN - PETROVO RESERVOIR ............................... 41

2.3.3.3 RESERVOIRS .................................................................................................... 41 2.3.3.4 DISTRIBUTION PIPELINES ....................................................................................... 42 2.3.3.5 CONSUMERS .................................................................................................... 42 2.3.3.6 WATER PRODUCTION AND WATER CONSUMPTION ............................................................ 42

2.3.4 KAKMUŽ – PETROVO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM .................................................................... 43 2.3.4.1 SOURCES ........................................................................................................ 44 2.3.4.2 RESERVOIRS .................................................................................................... 46 2.3.4.3 MAIN TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION PIPELINE ........................................................... 47 2.3.4.4 DISTRIBUTION NETWORK IN KAKMUŽ SETTLEMENT AND PART OF PETROVO ................................. 48 2.3.4.5 CONSUMERS .................................................................................................... 48 2.3.4.6 WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................... 48 2.3.4.7 WATER SUPPLYING OF OTHER SETTLEMENTS ................................................................. 48

2.3.5 SOČKOVAC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM ............................................................................... 49 2.3.5.1 "VRELA" SOURCE ............................................................................................... 49 2.3.5.2 TRANSMISSION PIPELINE ....................................................................................... 49 2.3.5.3 RESERVOIRS .................................................................................................... 49 2.3.5.4 DISTRIBUTION NETWORK ....................................................................................... 50 2.3.5.5 OTHER SOURCES ................................................................................................ 52 2.3.5.6 OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................... 52 2.3.5.7 WATER PRODUCTION AND WATER CONSUMPTION ............................................................ 52 2.3.5.8 REGULATORY PLAN ............................................................................................ 52

2.3.6 KARANOVAC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM ............................................................................. 54 2.3.6.1 SOURCES IN WSS KARANOVAC ................................................................................ 54 2.3.6.2 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM IN WSS KARANOVAC ................................................................ 54 2.3.6.3 RESERVOIR ...................................................................................................... 54 2.3.6.4 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IN WSS KARANOVAC ................................................................. 55 2.3.6.5 WATER PRODUCTION AND WATER CONSUMPTION ............................................................ 56 2.3.6.6 REGULATORY PLAN ............................................................................................ 56

2.3.7 OVERALL DATA FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY.................................................................... 57 2.3.8 WATER PRODUCTION AND WATER CONSUMPTION ................................................................ 59

2.4 ANALYSIS AND CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF PARTNER MUNICIPALITY AND ASSOCIATED UTILITY COMPANY ..................................................................................... 60 2.5 ANALYSIS OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ....................... 62

2.5.1 COVERAGE AREA OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ................................... 62 2.5.2 SOURCES AND BALANCE OF WATER QUANTITIES ................................................................. 62

2.5.2.1 ABSTRACTED WATER QUANTITIES ............................................................................. 62 2.5.2.2 SOURCE PROTECTION AND WATER QUALITY .................................................................. 63 2.5.2.3 WATER QUANTITY BALANCE IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ..................................................... 63 2.5.2.4 PROJECTED WATER REQUIREMENTS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ............................................. 63

2.5.2.4.1 SPECIFIC WATER CONSUMPTION............................................................................................................ 63 2.5.2.4.2 PROJECTED POPULATION IN PLANNING PERIOD ...................................................................................... 64 2.5.2.4.3 PROJECTED WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ........................................................ 65

2.5.3 RESERVOIRS .......................................................................................................... 75 2.5.3.1 PETROVO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – REQUIREMENTS FOR RESERVOIRS ...................................... 75 2.5.3.2 KAKMUŽ WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – REQUIREMENTS FOR RESERVOIRS....................................... 75 2.5.3.3 SOČKOVAC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – REQUIREMENTS FOR RESERVOIRS .................................... 76 2.5.3.4 KARANOVAC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – REQUIREMENTS FOR RESERVOIRS .................................. 76 2.5.3.5 PETROVO MUNICIPALITY – REQUIREMENTS FOR RESERVOIRS ................................................. 77



2.5.4 PIPELINES IN THE SYSTEM ........................................................................................... 77 2.5.4.1 TRANSMISSION PIPELINES ...................................................................................... 79

2.5.4.1.1 PETROVO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – TRANSMISSION PIPELINES ................................................................ 79 2.5.4.1.2 KAKMUŽ WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – TRANSMISSION PIPELINES .............................................................. 79 2.5.4.1.3 SOČKOVAC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – TRANSMISSION PIPELINES ........................................................... 80 2.5.4.1.4 KARANOVAC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – TRANSMISSION PIPELINES ........................................................ 81

2.5.4.2 DISTRIBUTION NETWORK ....................................................................................... 82 2.5.5 BALANCE OF WATER QUANTITIES .................................................................................. 82 2.5.6 MEASUREMENTS IN THE SYSTEM ................................................................................... 83 2.5.7 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ............................. 84

2.5.7.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 84 2.5.7.2 INPUT DATA FOR HYDRAULIC MODEL ......................................................................... 84

2.6 REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ............................................................................... 86

2.6.1 DISADVANTAGES IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS OF PETROVO MUNICIPALITY .................................... 86 2.6.1.1 LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS .......................................................... 86 2.6.1.2 LACK OF SYSTEM MEASUREMENTS ............................................................................ 86 2.6.1.3 SOURCES ........................................................................................................ 87 2.6.1.4 LACK OF PLANNING PROJECT DOCUMENTATION – CONCEPTUAL SOLUTIONS AND HYDRAULIC MODEL ..... 87 2.6.1.5 HIGH PERCENTAGE OF LOSSES IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM .................................................... 87 2.6.1.6 PIPELINES IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 87 2.6.1.7 ZONING OF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ........................................................................... 88 2.6.1.8 WORN OUT PIPELINES AT HOUSEHOLD CONNECTIONS ........................................................ 88

2.6.2 REHABILITATION OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ................................... 88 2.6.3 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT BY 2035 ................................................................. 89

2.6.3.1 SPATIAL COVERAGE OF WSS PETROVO IN 2035 ............................................................... 89 2.6.3.2 WATER SUPPLY SOURCES IN 2035 ............................................................................. 89 2.6.3.3 WATER REQUIREMENTS AT THE END OF PLANNING PERIOD BY THE YEAR 2035 ............................. 91 2.6.3.4 SOLUTION CONCEPT FOR PLANNED WSS PETROVO FOR THE PLANNING PERIOD BY THE YEAR 2035 ........ 91 2.6.3.5 ESTIMATE OF REQUIRED FACILITIES IN PETROVO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM ................................... 93

2.7 PRICED BILL OF QUANTITIES ................................................................... 95 2.7.1 SYSTEM REHABILITATION ........................................................................................... 95 2.7.2 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MAIN DISTRIBUTION TRANSMISSION PIPELINES ....................................... 95

2.7.2.1 RECONSTRUCTION OF DISTRIBUTION NETWORK IN WSS KARANOVAC ....................................... 95 2.7.2.2 RECONSTRUCTION OF DISTRIBUTION NETWORK IN WSS SOČKOVAC ......................................... 96 2.7.2.3 NEW TRANSMISSION PIPELINE OB2 WELL – PLANNED RESERVOIR – DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ............... 97 2.7.2.4 RECONSTRUCTION OF DISTRIBUTION NETWORK IN WSS KAKMUŽ AND PETROVO ........................... 97

2.7.3 REHABILITATION OF EXISTING RESERVOIRS AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW RESERVOIRS ................. 99 2.7.3.1 REHABILITATION OF CAPTURE STRUCTURES AND RESERVOIRS ............................................... 99 2.7.3.2 CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESERVOIRS .......................................................................... 99

2.7.4 CONSTRUCTION OF CHLORINE STATIONS – GAS CHLORINATION ................................................ 99 2.7.5 OPENING OF NEW SOURCES ......................................................................................... 99 2.7.6 SKADA REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEM .............................................................................. 100 2.7.7 RECAPITULATION .................................................................................................. 100

3 PRIORITIZED PLAN OF INVESTMENT MEASURES FOR THE PERIOD OF 10

YEARS .......................................................................................... 101

3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................102 3.2 PRICED BILL OF QUANTITY FOR PRIORITIZED PLAN OF INVESTMENT MEASURES ..........103

3.2.1 SYSTEM REHABILITATION ......................................................................................... 103 3.2.2 CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW MAIN DISTRIBUTION TRANSMISSION PIPELINES ............................... 103 3.2.3 REHABILITATION OF EXISTING RESERVOIRS AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESERVOIRS .................... 103

3.2.3.1 REHABILITATION OF CAPTURE STRUCTURES AND RESERVOIRS ............................................. 103 3.2.3.2 CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESERVOIRS ........................................................................ 104

3.2.4 CONSTRUCTION OF CHLORINE STATIONS – GAS CHLORINATION .............................................. 104 3.2.5 SKADA REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEM .............................................................................. 104 3.2.6 RECAPITULATION .................................................................................................. 105

3.3 FUNDING SOURCES .............................................................................106 3.3.1 MACROECONOMIC AVAILABILITY AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ......................................... 106

3.3.1.1 INCREASING THE NUMBER OF USERS .......................................................................... 107 3.3.1.2 INCREASING THE WATER SUPPLY SERVICE COST .............................................................. 107



3.3.1.3 SAVINGS IN UTILITY COMPANY OPERATION ................................................................. 114 3.3.2 SOCIAL ASPECTS OF INCREASING THE COST OF WATER SUPPLY SERVICES ................................... 115 3.3.3 PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ABILITIES TO FINANCE THE WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS ........................... 116

4 FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR PRIORITY INVESTMENTS ............................. 119

4.1 IDENTIFYING TECHNICAL SCOPE FOR INVESTMENT MEASURES AND COST ASSESSMENT .120 4.2 FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .......................................................122

4.2.1 OPERATION EXPENSES OF UTILITY COMPANY ................................................................... 122 4.2.2 COST RECOVERY PLAN ............................................................................................ 122

4.3 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ..................................131 4.4 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND STRATEGY .....................................................131 4.5 DYNAMIC PLAN .................................................................................132

5 APPENDICES ............................................................................. 133

APPENDIX 1: GENERAL MAP OF PETROVO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – THE CURRENT STATE .....134 APPENDIX 2: GENERAL MAP OF PETROVO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – THE PLANNED STATE .....134

TABLES:

TABLE 1: POPULATION BY SETTLEMENTS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY – THE 1991 CENSUS AND ESTIMATES FOR 2010 ......... 26 TABLE 2: INTERNAL MIGRATION IN MUNICIPALITY PETROVO, 2009 ............................................................... 29 TABLE 3: NATURAL INCREASE IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY – 2009 ................................................................. 29 TABLE 4: CHANGE IN POPULATION NUMBERS DURING THE LAST 5 YEARS ......................................................... 29 TABLE 5: CHANGE IN POPULATION NUMBERS BY SETTLEMENTS IN THE PERIOD FROM 1971 TILL TODAY ........................ 30 TABLE 6: POPULATION ESTIMATE FOR THE 2035 PLANNING PERIOD ............................................................... 31 TABLE 7: EXISTING AND POTENTIAL SOURCES IN THE AREA OF PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ......................................... 38 TABLE 8: TRANSMISSION PIPELINES IN WSS PETROVO ............................................................................. 41 TABLE 9: RESERVOIRS IN WSS PETROVO............................................................................................ 41 TABLE 10: RESERVOIRS IN WSS KAKMUŽ .......................................................................................... 47 TABLE 11: TRANSMISSION PIPELINES IN WSS KAKMUŽ ............................................................................ 48 TABLE 12: RESERVOIRS IN WSS SOČKOVAC ........................................................................................ 50 TABLE 13: PIPELINES IN WSS SOČKOVAC ........................................................................................... 50 TABLE 14: RESERVOIRS IN WSS KARANOVAC ...................................................................................... 55 TABLE 15: PIPELINES IN WSS KARANOVAC ......................................................................................... 55 TABLE 16: PIPELINE SUMMARY FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ..................................................................... 57 TABLE 17: RESERVOIRS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ................................................................................ 57 TABLE 18: SOURCE SUMMARY FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ...................................................................... 58 TABLE 19: PRODUCED, REVENUE AND NON-REVENUE WATER QUANTITY ........................................................ 59 TABLE 20: PRICE OF WATER IN 2010 ................................................................................................ 61 TABLE 21: PLANNED PRICE FOR WATER IN 2015 .................................................................................... 61 TABLE 22: POPULATION SUPPLIED WITH WATER FROM WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS ................................................. 62 TABLE 23: POPULATION SERVICED FROM THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS ........................................................... 62 TABLE 24: PLANNED POPULATION GROWTH IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY - SUMMARY ............................................ 65 TABLE 25: PROGNOSIS OF PEAK DAILY WATER QUANTITIES IN PLANNING PERIOD BY 2035 ...................................... 67 TABLE 26: ESTIMATES OF REQUIRED WATER QUANTITIES FOR WSS PETROVO ................................................... 68 TABLE 27: ESTIMATES OF REQUIRED WATER QUANTITIES FOR WSS KAKMUŽ .................................................... 69 TABLE 28: ESTIMATES OF REQUIRED WATER QUANTITIES FOR WSS SOČKOVAC .................................................. 70 TABLE 29: ESTIMATES OF REQUIRED WATER QUANTITIES FOR WSS KARANOVAC ............................................... 71 TABLE 30: ESTIMATES OF REQUIRED WATER QUANTITIES FOR THE AREA OF PORJEČINE .......................................... 72 TABLE 31: ESTIMATES OF REQUIRED WATER QUANTITIES FOR THE AREA OF KRTOVA AND KALUĐERICA ........................ 73 TABLE 32: ESTIMATES OF REQUIRED WATER QUANTITIES FOR THE AREA OF PETROVO MUNICIPALITY .......................... 74 TABLE 33: TRANSMISSION PIPELINES IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY .................................. 81 TABLE 34: DISTRIBUTION PIPELINES IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY .................................................................. 82 TABLE 35: WATER BALANCE ........................................................................................................ 83 TABLE 36: BALANCE OF AVAILABLE WATER QUANTITIES AND REQUIREMENTS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ..................... 90 TABLE 37: REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER IN FUTURE WSS PETROVO – THE YEAR 2035 ............................................ 91 TABLE 38: REQUIRED RESERVOIR SPACE AT THE END OF PLANNING PERIOD BY 2035 ............................................. 93



TABLE 39: PLANNED RESERVOIRS IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ..................................................................... 93 TABLE 40: AN OVERVIEW OF NEW PIPELINES, PIPELINE REPLACEMENT AND PIPELINES WHICH ARE BEING PUT OUT OF SERVICE

ACCORDING TO HYDRAULIC MODEL IN 2035 .................................................................................. 94 TABLE 41: CURRENT COSTS OF WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE SERVICES ..................................................... 107 TABLE 42: WATER SUPPLY EXPENSES EXPRESSED AS THE PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME ..................................... 111 TABLE 43: RECAPITULATION OF THE PRIORITY MEASURES PLAN .................................................................. 120 TABLE 44: REVISED PLAN OF PRIORITY MEASURES ................................................................................ 121

SCHEMES: SCHEME 1: WSS PETROVO – HYDRAULIC MODEL .................................................................................. 85 SCHEME 2: PETROVO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM SCHEME – PLANNED SOLUTION FOR 2035 ......................................... 92

FIGURES: FIGURE 1: LAND USE – CURRENT SITUATION ....................................................................................... 12 FIGURE 2: MAP OF PETROVO MUNICIPALITY ........................................................................................ 18



1 REGISTRATION



COMPANY LICENSE

COMPANY REGISTRATION


Chapter: Master Plan 10

2 MASTER PLAN



2.1 INTRODUCTION

2.1.1 INTRODUCTORY EXPLANATIONS

The issue of water supply in Petrovo municipality is solved via minor local water supply systems.

Virtually every local community has its central water supply system and series of smaller system

which supply a small number of inhabitants.

2.1.2 GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION OF PETROVO MUNICIPALITY

Petrovo municipality is located in the northeast part

of Bosnia and Herzegovina, i.e. in central part of

Republic of Srpska, at the base of Ozren Mountain.

It stretches at the north-eastern foot of Ozren

Mountain, along the left bank of the Spreča River,

bordering municipalities Doboj, Gračanica, Lukavac

and Maglaj. Spreča River is the northern border of

municipality while Mount Ozren makes southern

border, with its highest peaks: Kraljica 883 meters,

Krstata ploča 893 meters and Ostrvica 918 meters

above see level to the southwest.

In terms of terrain, 65% of municipal territory

consists of hilly and mountainous areas that are

slightly raised from 35% of flat part of Spreča field

ending in the highest mountain peaks of Ozren.

Spreča River flows through the municipality.

Petrovo municipality covers an area of 131 km² and

has 9,290 inhabitants i.e. 88.7 inhabitants per square

kilometre.

It is situated 25 km far from Doboj and belongs to the

group of the underdeveloped municipalities in

Republic of Srpska.

The area of Petrovo municipality includes seven

settlements as follows: Petrovo, which is the only

settlement with the urban characteristics, then

Kakmuž, Kaluđerica, Karanovac, Krtova, Porječina

and Sočkovac. Local communities are established in

each of the seven settlements. Petrovo is almost

entirely rural area, except the small part of LC

Petrovo where the administrative centre of

municipality is situated and which has the greatest

population density.

Petrovo has moderate continental climate, with hot summers and cold winters. Maximum precipitation

occurs in the spring time and in early summer while minimum in early autumn. During the winter, the

snow cover is abundant. In terms of geological structure in the territory of districts there are smaller

deposits of asbestos ore, copper and coal.

Settlements

The area of Petrovo municipality consists of settlements as follows:

Vasiljevci, Kakmuž, Kaluđerica, Karanovac, Krtova, Petrovo, Porječina, Sočkovac and Stupari.

Petrovo Municipality

Coat of Arms Municipal Borders

Basic Information

Entity: Republic of Srpska

Area: 131 km²

Population: 9..290

http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%95%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%82http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%80%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%88%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BEhttp://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0:Naselje_petrovo_02.jpghttp://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0:Petrovo_RS-grb.gifhttp://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0:BH_municipality_location_Petrovo.pnghttp://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0:Flag_of_Republika_Srpska.svg



Petrovo is the only settlement with urban characteristics and there has been established a local

community in each settlement: LC Kakmuž, LC Kaluđerica, LC Karanovac, LC Krtova, LC Petrovo,

LC Porječina, LC Sočkovac.

The following settlements of pre-war municipalities have become the part of Republic of Srpska:

Maglaj: Donja Paklenica, Gornja Paklenica, Osojnica, Rječica Donja, Rječica Gornja, Striježevica and Trbuk, as well as the parts of settlements: Brezici, Brusnica, Donji

Rakovac, Kopice and Lugovi,

Gračanica: Boljanić, Bosansko Petrovo Selo, Kakmuž, Karanovac, Porječina and Sočkovac, as well as the parts of settlements: Skipovac Donji and Skipovac Gornji,

Lukavac: the parts of settlements: Krtova and Vasiljevci.

These settlements form the municipality Petrovo.

The official announcement of Petrovo municipality is determined by the Law on Serbian

municipalities in FS Bosnia and Herzegovina, FSRY during the formation of Republic of Srpska on

January 9, 1992, which has not been published in Official Gazette due to outbreak of war in Bosnia

and Herzegovina. Reaffirmation of Petrovo municipality was conducted at the National Assembly of

Republic of Srpska on 21 July 1993 by the law published in the Official Gazette of The Republic of

Srpska No.12/93. Before this decision, settlements of Petrovo municipality belonged to Gračanica

municipality and Maglaj municipality. The seat of municipality Petrovo was then called Bosansko

Petrovo Selo.

Figure 1: Land Use – Current Situation

In terms of terrain, 65% of municipal territory consists of hilly and mountainous areas that are slightly

raised from 35% of flat part of Spreča field ending in the highest mountain peaks of Ozren. Its area is

http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%94%D0%BE%D1%9A%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%9A%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9E%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%98%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A0%D1%98%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0_%D0%94%D0%BE%D1%9A%D0%B0&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A0%D1%98%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0_%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%9A%D0%B0&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A1%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A2%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BA&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%91%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0)http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%94%D0%BE%D1%9A%D0%B8_%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%94%D0%BE%D1%9A%D0%B8_%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B5&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%99%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%9Bhttp://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%B6http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86_(%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE)http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%98%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A1%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86_%D0%94%D0%BE%D1%9A%D0%B8&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A1%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86_%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%9A%D0%B8&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D1%80%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%99%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%86%D0%B8&action=edit&redlink=1http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0_(%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4)http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%98



rich in various mineral resources such as asbestos, kaolin, brick clay, thermo mineral and alkaline

water, as well as some noble, still insufficiently investigated metals. Although Petrovo municipality is

one of the extremely underdeveloped municipalities in the Republic of Srpska, it has seen strong

growth and development in the last few decades, primarily due to favourable geographical position

and great natural wealth of its close surrounding.

2.1.3 POPULATION

The population of Petrovo municipality is predominantly rural, unevenly distributed, with greater

concentration in plain and hilly terrain. The ethnic structure of population has slightly changed

compared to the data of the last, official census from 1991.

Besides large-scale migration, caused by war, and later the lack of economic and development

perspective, another key demographic feature of municipality is unfavourable trend of negative

population growth.1

According to the 1991 census, settlements Petrovo, Kakmuž, Karanovac, Porječina and Sočkovac had

8 403 inhabitants. Until 1992 Petrovo municipality had mainly labour force population with additional

engagement in agricultural activities. By this time most of the population was employed in

industrialized Tuzla basin, and in the area of current Petrovo municipality in companies for exploiting

and processing of asbestos in Petrovo, the production of brick products in Sočkovac, exploitation and

timber processing in Petrovo and Karanovac, the use of thermo mineral water and production of liquid

carbon monoxide in Kakmuž, manufacturing of building structures and elements in Petrovo, the

production of blown plastic containers in Kakmuž and poultry farms in Karanovac and Porječina. In

the area of current Petrovo municipality the tourism has also been developed with beautiful mountain

scenery of Ozren and Monastery of St. Nicholas from 13th century in the centre of Mount Ozren, in

today’s settlement Kaluđerica, along with restaurants and tourist facilities.

There are currently around 9,290 inhabitants (4,741 M/ 4,549 F) in the municipality, of which 1,196

persons are minors. According to data from the Institute for Statistics of Republic of Srpska and

Petrovo Municipality, 51 (29M/22F) babies were born in the municipality in 2004 while in 2005 this

number dropped to 40 (22M/18F). Then the number of births, compared to the previous year,

increased to 45 (21M/24F), while in 2007 dropped again to 40 (23M/17F). During 2008, number of

new-born babies has risen again to 46 (21M/25F), and that trend continued during 2009 when 49

babies were born (33M/16F).2

From the above stated, we can conclude that Petrovo municipality has the annual average of 45 new-

born babies (25M/20F). It is estimated that in 2010 the number of new-borns is higher in comparison

with previous period.

Municipality Petrovo has 1,196 minors (616 M/580 F) aged 0 to 18 years.

Petrovo municipality belongs to underdeveloped municipalities in Republic of Srpska. In 2004, from 1

215 employees in Petrovo municipality as much as 43% are employed outside economy.

According to Employment Agency data, there are 1,331 registered unemployed persons (715 M/616

F) in Petrovo Municipality.

Medical Centre 'Ozren', Petrovo offers primary health care for population in territory of Petrovo

municipality, while hospital treatment is provided by the General Hospital 'St. Luke the Apostle' in

Doboj.

Primary school has 508 students (257M/251F) and secondary school 118 students (58M/60F).

To the best knowledge of Petrovo Municipality, there are estimates that in 2008 there were 190

students, and now there are 200.

1 Source: ’Strategic Development Plan for Petrovo Municipality(2007-2012)“

2 Source: Institute for Statistics of Republic of Srpska and Petrovo Municipality

http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/1991http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BEhttp://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%B6http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86_%28%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%29http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%98%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/1992http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%9E%D0%B7%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD



In both primary schools and in secondary school there has been a slight decrease in number of

students.3

2.1.4 ECONOMY

Due to the favourable geographical position and great natural wealth of its close surrounding Petrovo

has seen strong growth and development especially in the last few decades. Economic base has

steadily been improved by construction of new industrial and infrastructural facilities, increasing

production and export. In plain parts of municipality the most common crops are corn, wheat, barley,

oats, rye and others. On the hilly parts the fruit production is developed, along with livestock, poultry,

etc.

The dominant branch of economy makes wood processing. Lately, more and more companies are

dealing with plastic processing. In parallel with these activities, other branches of economy have been

developed such as construction, transport, trade, crafts, tourism and other economic activities.

Concerning the industrial resources, municipality’s best known company is the former asbestos mine

and liquid gas factory Tehnogas Kakmuž.

Although Petrovo municipality is one of extremely underdeveloped municipalities in Republic of

Srpska, its area is rich in various mineral resources such as asbestos, kaolin, brick clay, thermo mineral

and alkaline water, as well as some noble, still insufficiently investigated metals.

Municipality Petrovo takes significant steps towards achieving its goals in the realisation of

development plans and completing the overall image of municipality by establishing all local and state

authorities and relevant institutions. In municipality Petrovo it was built a Public Safety Station, new

post office, many banks are opened, High school centre with around 120 students in multiple

occupation (other students attend classes in schools in Doboj), there are two primary schools with

local departments in all settlements and around 700 students, there is a Health Centre, Woodlands

Doboj – Petrovo Forest Administration. There is also a number of very successful companies: Wood

processing „Ilić“ Karanovac, „PRENJA“ Karanovac „Momac-Drvo“ Petrovo, „Metal-Prom“ Kakmuž,

„PEJIĆ KOMPANI“ Petrovo, „Radeljić“ Petrovo, „Eco Line“ Petrovo, „HGP“Petrovo, „OZREN

PROM“ Petrovo, „TMD“ Petrovo -Karanovac, „LIMEKS“ Karanovac, „POL KOMERC“ Karanovac,

„Tehnogas-Kakmuž“ Kakmuž, „Duvaplast“ Kakmuž, „Plastika Božić“ Sočkovac, „PANAIR

SISTEM“ Sočkovac, „SAS KOMERC“ Sočkovac, etc.

Development of Petrovo municipality is directed towards the exploitation of mineral resources,

especially thermo-mineral water and liquid carbon monoxide, as well as the development of tourism.

In addition, existing exploitation of forests and wood processing, production of construction elements

contributes to the significant development of Petrovo municipality. Development of animal husbandry

and agriculture has been particularly emphasized in recent years: poultry, milk production, greenhouse

production and fruit growing.

The main facilities are wood-processing industry, light chemical industry, animal husbandry and

production of construction materials. The most common is wood-processing industry (ten companies),

from primary to final processing of wood. The second most common activity is processing of plastic

(four companies).

The area of Petrovo municipality is abundant in natural resources. It is rich in forests, asbestos

deposits, gas, thermo mineral water and polimineral clay. This is just a part of natural resources (there

is a prepared document ‘mapping of natural resources’ with a list of all known mineral resources).

Land of Sprečansko field is suitable for growing wheat, corn, cabbage, while in the area that stretches

from railway tracks towards the heights of Mount Ozren fruits are thriving especially apples, plums,

pears, sour cherries and cherries. There are excellent conditions for raising livestock. Everything is

there, but little is operational. In addition to arable land and forest resources, which are undoubted

resources of this area, we should point out unique mineral resources. A common characteristic for

3 Source: ’Strategic Development Plan for Petrovo Municipality(2007-2012)



almost all natural and mineral resources which are at the disposal of Petrovo municipality is their

insufficient research on the one hand, and negligible economic effect, on the other.

Basic economic activities are as follows: rural type agriculture with something more developed

poultry, initial dairy cattle breeding, traditional farming, greenhouse production, etc., traditional

industry sectors: brick industry, semi-final and final wood processing, exploitation of thermo-mineral

water and liquid CO2, production of building construction and concrete elements, blown and moulded

plastic packaging, and other economic activities in the area of services, trade, transport, catering and

craft.

When we exclude public sector, a dynamic review of employment by sectors shows a strong

dominance of manufacturing industry. Participation of other sectors is almost negligible. A similar

situation exists with financial indicators (situation in 2004). Manufacturing is thus the dominant

economic sector, both in terms of employment and in terms of financial indicators. Other sectors are

significantly lagging behind. Industrial companies, in turn, do not have the necessary level of business

competitiveness and competitiveness of products, in order to provide real need of employment and

development in Petrovo municipality. Although the export-import ratio was excellent for Bosnia and

Herzegovina’s context, unfavourable is the trend that shows a drop in export, and import growth in

2005.

A slight increase of budget revenues was recorded in the period from 2001 to 2004. The increase is the

result of continuous growth in tax revenues and realized credit loans. Non-tax revenues had the reverse

trend, with fluctuations. Oscillations are also characteristic of an item of current and capital assistance

and gains, but also much less achievement than planned. It is obvious that the municipal budget will

not be able to provide expected high level of financing development projects and capital investment

for construction of utility and other infrastructure. On the other hand, it is important to provide a much

better financial management than in the past, but also introduce long-term financial planning , and

municipality Petrovo is making great efforts to achieve this goals (adopted “Capital Investment Plan

2010-2015“).

Ozren Mountain is rich in natural resources, especially with healthy drinking water with sources in the

ecologically preserved environment, thermal mineral waters with healing properties, and other mining

and mineral resources.

2.1.5 TOURISM

Ozren Monastery was founded in late 13th century and from then until today monastery is the centre

of religious life of Orthodox Serbs at Ozren and elsewhere. The monastery was built by Serbian King

Dragutin from the line of Nemanjići, which at that time ruled in the area of Usora and Soli (parts of

present-day northern Bosnia).

In the past, in the area of present-day Petrovo municipality, tourism was developed offering beautiful

scenery of Mount Ozren and Monastery of St. Nicholas from 13th century located in the mountain

centre, today’s settlement Kaluđerica, as well as restaurants and tourist facilities.

The area of Petrovo municipality is famous for traditional folk events and preservation of ethnological

folk customs and culture.4

During the summer, when the cultural events in municipality are more frequent, the number of tourist

is increased, as well as during the great national gathering for Velika Gospojina (Assumption Feast) on

28 August at the historically famous monastery ‘St. Nikolas’ in Ozren, but also during various cultural

manifestation, such as Easter cross country running and mountain marathon. Singing songs typical for

this area, playing famous Ozren games and wearing Ozren costumes, population of Petrovo

4 Source: „Strategic Development Plan for Petrovo Municipality (2007-2012)“

http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%9E%D0%B7%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD



municipality is developing tradition of Ozren area, which contributes to the development of tourism in

the municipality.

During above-mentioned cultural events, many young people participate in these activities, as

members of existing cultural and artistic associations, NGOs and other associations.

2.1.6 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES5

The Municipal Assembly of Petrovo made a ‘Strategic Development Plan of Petrovo municipality

(2007-2012)’ to encourage improvement of quality of life of its citizens.

The vision of the Municipality is „Petrovo 2020 – within the developed municipalities’ category“.

Within this vision Petrovo municipality will be recognizable for its good living conditions and

lucrative business opportunities, healthy, rejuvenated, progressive community with a steady

demographic growth, with around 1,000 entrepreneurial family businesses and sustainable households

and with over 100 growing small and medium size companies, offering good quality employment

opportunities and investments in social infrastructure, a community living in a complete harmony with

natural and spiritual richness of Ozren mountain.

To achieve the vision of Petrovo municipality, which aims at overall improvement of conditions in the

municipality, the five set strategic goals should be reached:

1. Built physical and business infrastructure for development of small and medium enterprises;

2. Built family and rural entrepreneurship with the market oriented agricultural production;

3. Economically exploited natural resources and tourism potentials based on the sustainable development concept;

4. Significantly improved utility and social infrastructure;

5. Demographically rehabilitated and rejuvenated community, with competitive human resources and developed youth entrepreneurship.

One of the goals within the Petrovo municipality vision points out the importance of improving utility

and social infrastructure. SWOT analysis allocated undeveloped utility infrastructure as one of the

weaknesses of Petrovo municipality. Analysis of the municipal budget showed that it is obvious that

the municipal budget will not be able to provide expected level of financing development projects and

capital investment for construction of utility and other infrastructure. For this reason, it is important to

provide a much better financial management than in the past, but also introduce long-term financial

planning. Also, the existing level of social, cultural and sporting life is far below the quality of life

necessary for ambitious development of municipality and its demographic rejuvenation.

Implementation of activities in the improvement of utility and social infrastructure implies a gradual

building of utility, social, cultural and sporting infrastructure and significant enrichment of social,

cultural and sporting life, which will make Petrovo municipality a pleasant place to live and visit.

Realization of this goal will significantly contribute to retaining young people in Petrovo municipality

as one of the main prerequisites for achieving the next goal related to the rejuvenated community and

creating competitive human resources.

5 Source: „Strategic Development Plan for Petrovo Municipality (2007-2012)“



Figure 2: Map of Petrovo Municipality

2.1.7 WATER SUPPLYING OF POPULATION AND INDUSTRY IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY

The following text provides description of the system from the Terms of Reference.

Strategic – planning documents

Organization/Institution is required to align Study of water supply of Municipality Petrovo with the

following documents:

o Development strategy of Municipality Petrovo (2007-2012);

o Municipal Action Plan (2009-2011);

o Spatial plan of Municipality Petrovo (under way).

Beside listed strategic planning documents, the Organization/Institution will have access to all other

spatial planning documents such as zoning plans and projects, regulation plans, plotting plans, etc.

Organization/Institution can use and take over the results, reports and findings of the listed documents

or request to perform additional research subject to approval of the municipality.

Studies, projects and layers

Organization/Institution will have access to and can use the following document:

o Project for reconstruction of water network Kakmuž-Petrovo, Institute for waters, Bijeljina (2007).

There are no projects or studies related to water resources and their protection.

All existing documents relevant for engineering will be available in either soft or hard copy form.

Current condition of water supply within Municipality Petrovo

Water supply of all customers in the urban areas of municipality is ensured via reaching water from 4

main sources (Kaluđerica Petrovo, Jama Petrovo and Kakmuž Petrovo). Besides that, there are several

independent water supply systems in the rural parts within the following local communities:

Karanovac, Sočkovac and Kakmuž.

All systems in Petrovo’s network are gravitational except for one part in Kaluđerica where there is a

need for pumping.

Management, use and maintenance of public water network are responsibility of Public Company

Komunalo Petrovo established in 1990. Besides public network, there are several local water supply

systems as listed above. These systems are not under control of responsible legal institution. System in

Karanovac is managed by association of citizens while other systems are managed by Local

Communities.

Water utility company takes care of 961 connections within public network in Petrovo (898

households and 63 enterprises). Public network covers around 28% of population while 72% of

customers residing in rural parts are supplied from local systems.

Water utility company does not perform measurements of physical losses in the network. It is

estimated that total amount of unaccounted water is 70%.

Length of distributive public network is 15 km. Dominant pipe material is AC covering 50% of

network. PVC covers 48% of the network (28% of relatively new pipes and 20% of older pipes) while

remaining 2% of network is covered by cast iron. Quality of raw spring water on sources is

satisfactory except on Jama Petrovo with occasional occurrence of mud after precipitation. Water is

disinfected at all reservoirs.

Water quality control is performed by Institute for Health Protection Doboj.



The most significant problems related to operation of water supply system are as follows:

1. High percentage of uncounted quantities of water (losses).

2. Dilapidated distribution network and low quality of installed materials along with unplanned expansion of network.

3. Inadequate pipe diameters cause big line losses resulting in reduced flow and pressure drop especially during summer months.

4. Water quality at source Jama Petrovo varies – large catchment areas, water conditioning is not performed except disinfection by chlorine – there is no regular monitoring of water quality.

5. Automatic monitoring and control of system (telemetry) is not in place causing increased network maintenance costs.

6. There are several water supply subsystems that are not finalized in technical sense and they are not submitted to the management of water utility company resulting in unsafe water supply

in rural areas.

Initial engineering data6 are:

- Average daily water abstraction is 1,400 m3/day

- Average daily consumption of industry is 50 m3/day

- Average total water consumption per capita 131 l/per/day

Organization/Institution should accept these parameters as preliminary and come to final proposal

upon detail analysis.

Distribution of water in Petrovo municipality is uneven. Residents and economy of Petrovo

municipality do not have satisfactory potable water supply due to lack or obsolete existing water

supply systems. Water supply systems are not adequate and do not fully satisfy the needs of the

municipal population. This problem particularly affects the population in central part of municipality

that is lacking sufficient amounts of drinking water in water supply system, and private wells do not

have safe water because of population density and lack of sewerage network.

Public Enterprise „Komunal“ which was dissolved and then re-established during the Study drafting

and which employs 10 persons, provides maintenance services of water supply system and delivery of

water for 4 local communities (Petrovo, Porječina, Kaluđerica and Krtova). In these 4 local

communities the company services 961 households, which on the average have three members each,

which indicate, according to estimates, that the company services 2883 users.

According to information obtained by Petrovo Municipality, in the remaining three local communities

(Karanovac, Sočkovac and Kakmuž) maintenance of water supply system and water delivery are

responsibility of citizens’ associations. In the three aforementioned local communities, public water

supply covers total of 977 households.

PE „Komunal“Petrovo also provides services of garbage disposal.

Sanitary–epidemiological services at Healthcare Centre „Ozren“ in Petrovo municipality, among other

activities, performs water testing, but this service has no specialist. Duties of specialist are being

performed by technician. Since Petrovo Municipality has a problem of drinking water, solid results are

achieved in the field of preventive healthcare of infectious diseases. Sanitary-epidemiological service,

in the framework of its duties and job descriptions, performs regular vaccination and systematic

examination of children, and they have not registered any forms of epidemic.

6 Data available for public network only.



The occupational structure in PE „Komunal“ is given below:

Seq.No. Employed Staff Total

1 MSc of Mechanical Engineering 1

2 Economist 1

3 Mechanical Technician 1

4 Machinist 1

5 Grammar school – a specialist of certain

duties 1

6 Skilled Welder 1

7 Driver 1

8 Low-skilled Worker 3

Total number of employees: 10

2.1.8 BACKGROUNDS

Backgrounds for draft of the Master plan are as follows:

2.1.8.1 GEODETIC SURVEYING MAPS

For the purpose of drafting the Master plan, geodetic maps of Petrovo area were used with a scale of

1:25 000 and surveying maps scale of 1:2,500 and 1:1,000.

2.1.8.2 URBANISTIC BACKGROUNDS

Spatial plan of this area was developed in 1996 and served as a main background for Conceptual

Design of water supply system.

2.1.8.3 SPATIAL PLAN OF PETROVO MUNICIPALITY, 2008

Spatial Plan was drafted by the Institute for Urbanism of Republic of Srpska j.s.c. Banja Luka, 2008.

The Spatial Plan provides among other things the chapter on population and population projections for

the period by 2015.

Some hydro technical infrastructure data were also presented in this Spatial Plan.

2.1.8.4 STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY, 2010

Strategic Development Plan was drafted shortly before developing Feasibility Study.

2.1.9 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

PROJECT DOCUMENTATION– CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

Conceptual design has never been developed for water supply of municipality which must be a priority

in the future.

"WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES IN PETROVO MUNICIPALITY – REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA"

This study gave an overview of existing and planned water sources in the area of municipality. Project

documentation was developed by "Vodobiro" from Gračanica, 2009.

"MAIN PROJECT – WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM ŠPILJA"



Project was developed by "Vodobiro" from Gračanica

"MAIN PROJECT – WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM PETROVO – CAPTURING AND CONVEYING WATER

FROM THE SOURCE "DJEDOVAC" AND "JAMA "

Project was developed by "Vodobiro" from Gračanica, 2002.

"CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR WATER SUPPLY PIPELINE FROM MONASTERY OZREN TO THE

RESERVOIR IN BOSANSKO PETROVO SELO "

Project was developed by "Institute for water management - Spreča" from Tuzla, 1983.

"MAIN PROJECT FOR WATER SUPPLY PIPELINE FROM MONASTERY OZREN TO THE RESERVOIR IN

BOSANSKO PETROVO SELO "

Project was developed by "Institute for water management - Spreča" from Tuzla, 1984.

"MAIN PROJECT OF RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SOURCE "VOLUJAK 1 AND 2", RESERVOIR

VOLUJAK AND MAIN TRANSMISSION PIPELINE FROM THE SOURCE VOLUJAK TO URBAN

DISTRIBUTION NETWORK WITH ASSOCIATED FACILITIES”

Project was developed by "Institute for water management Ltd. " Bijeljina, 2008.

Project documentation for Karanovac and Sočkovac.

2.1.10 OBJECTIVE AND ASSIGNMENT OF THE STUDY

2.1.10.1 ASSIGNMENT 1: INCEPTION REPORT INCLUDING ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT SITUATION

As part of the Inception report, the consultant will handle the following:

a) Current situation analysis:

- defining the area covered by the water supply service and specifying the number of users and connections in each relevant category, i.e. households in individual residential units,

households in collective residential units, industry, public institutions, businesses, farms for

raising cattle, chickens...

- analysis of consumption, or needs for water; overview of current situation by user category, average consumption per inhabitant, needs of industry and cattle-raising, public consumption;

analysis of the quantities of captured water at the sources and assessment of total losses.

- description of existing network, including sources and water supply zones, measure of protection of sources, water treatment, water quality, length, diameter and material of main

water pipes, reservoir space, pumping and re-pumping stations, including installed equipment

and any other technical characteristics of the water supply network;

- map of existing systems, facilities and assets;

- assessment of system components in terms of capacities, efficiency, performance, reliability, adequacy, maintenance practices, age and quality of material and equipment, quality and

quantity of raw water at the sources and treated water at the sources and in the network, source

protection measures...

- description and assessment of the management system, assessment of losses by water supply zones;

- assessment of the functioning of the water supply network;

- analysis and assessment of the capacities of the partner municipality and associated Water Utility Company in terms of management and running the existing and future

infrastructural facilities, considering technical capacities, human and financial resources. The



Consultant should make a critical assessment of the current management of the system, human

resources, organization, availability of technical equipment, operation and maintenance

concept. Where necessary, the Consultant should identify a need for future reforms, capacity

building and propose concepts for future management (organization, needs for human

resources, needs for equipment, enhancement of operation and maintenance...);

- socio-economic situation, financial analysis of the company's operation, analysis of current tariff system;

- analysis of institutional and legal regulatory framework – laws, regulations, rule books, standards, norms and directives which will be applied during the drafting of the Study and

with which the Study will be aligned.

a) Analysis of development projects, studies, project solutions and harmonization of development of water supply systems with development plans and projects.

2.1.10.2 ASSIGNMENT 2: WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN FOR PARTNER MUNICIPALITIES

Water Supply Master Plan contains the following elements:

a) Demographic projection for the planning period of 20 years based on an analysis of strategic planning documentation from the aspect of ensuring necessary quantities of drinking

water and industrial water. Defining the area covered by the water supply service provided

via water utility company and specification of the number of users and connections in each

relevant category, i.e. households in individual residential units, households in collective

residential units, industry, public institutions, businesses, farms for raising cattle,

chickens...Defining potential scenarios for development of the areas, number of inhabitants

and industrial, commercial and public activities;

b) Balance of available and required water quantities for the 20 year planning period (drinking and industrial water). Capacities of available resources. Assessment of future needs

for the planning period by zones and consumption groups. Assessment of possibility to

provide industrial water from alternative sources (pumping water from water flows, using

sources that cannot be used for drinking...).

c) Quality of drinking water at the sources and in the network. Detailed analysis and interpretation of existing physical and chemical and bacteriological findings.

Sampling and extended physical and chemical and bacteriological analyses of water

from the sources on three occasions in the course of drafting the Study in different

hydrological conditions.

Interpretation of all results and proposal of measures – types of water treatment for each of the

listed sources.

d) Drafting two to three variants of conceptual solutions for the water supply system which ensure achievement of the overall goal in the 20 year planning period, including cost

assessment, investment into construction, management and maintenance. Long-term financial

comparisons of proposed solutions and proposal for adoption of one of the solutions.

The conceptual solution should define the complete system, including water source, water

treatment, main pipelines, pumping and re-pumping stations, reservoir capacity and other

system elements. For each solution, the Consultant will provide hydraulic modelling.

e) Macro-available assessment and socio-economic analysis, investment capability to invest into the water supply system. The Consultant should asses the macro-available amount of

investment for implementation of measures. This indicative value will lead the Consultant in

the definition of an acceptable technical framework of measures. The total price should

include the cost of investment and reinvestment, cost of functioning and maintenance and cost

of general management.



The assessment of macro-availability should be based on the assessment of the real capacity of

users within local community to pay, which will be based on a socio-economic analysis,

including all users (households, commercial, industrial and institutional), with a view to

having an integrated approach to water supply systems, sewage systems and waste water

treatment.

An assessment of overall capacities in terms of community contribution should be made for

the period used in the Master Plan, based on the current situation and results of the socio-

economic evaluation, assessment of household reception needs and a projection of commercial

and industrial development. These scenarios should be studied: „optimistically“, „averagely“

and „pessimistically“. Each scenario should contain a forecast of the state, entity, cantonal and

municipal gross product in absolute values and in percentages of the GDP and gross income

per capita in partner municipality.

The analysis of availability should end with an assessment of users’ will to pay for water

supply, sewage system and waste water treatment services. This assessment should be based

on existing data, including all user categories. User community’s will and their contribution

capacities should be taken into account, which may give rise to a situation that the necessary

investments would be carried out in time phases.

f) Long-term water supply development plan. The plan will be based on the adopted concept – conceptual solution with defined water management facilities, water supply delineated by

systems, zones and subzones, calculated maximum needs for water, defined water treatment at

source locations, locations and capacities of reservoirs, pumping and re-pumping stations,

main pipelines, hydraulic calculations, management system and other technical elements. The

long-term development plan will identify facilities and costs and provide criteria for

prioritization of the project, including risk assessment and mitigation of consequences for

realization of full efficiency of the project.

2.1.10.3 ASSIGNMENT 3: PRIORITIZED PLAN OF INVESTMENT MEASURES FOR THE PERIOD OF 10 YEARS

On the basis of the criteria developed in the long-term water supply plan and taking into consideration

macro-available assessment and investment capability, the Consultant will define:

o Prioritized project list with dynamic implementation plan;

o Funding sources (delineated external and internal funding sources), time lines, expected outputs and risks in implementation.

2.1.10.4 ASSIGNMENT 4: FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR PRIORITY INVESTMENT MEASURES

Inception and implementation of this stage will follow as a result of the findings of the Master Plan.

For the priority investment component/components identified as investment measure/measures, the

Consultant should ensure that adequate considerations and alternative solutions are given. The

Consultant should pay special attention to the assumptions for engineering (input data) and ensure that

designing of plants and networks is in accordance with the current situation and realistic forecasts. The

Consultant will be asked to draft a Feasibility Study for the proposed priorities for the investment

measure(s) in order to prove that the proposed solutions are the best possible solutions feasible in the

planned period. The Feasibility Study should consider all technical, socio-economic, financial and

environmental aspects of measures.

The Consultant should ensure that the partner municipality and associated Water Utility Company,

authorities responsible for issuing permits/ licenses, as well as all other parties be informed on the

progress of the Feasibility Study.



Subassignment 1- Identifying technical scope for investment measures

The Consultant should prepare a short summary of the technical scope of work for identification of

investment measures and submit it to all interested parties for discussion (Project Steering Board,

Working Group or any other interested party for which the Consultant considers it is necessary to be

included). The short summary should be detailed enough to describe the background, proposed

solutions and possible benefits/enhancements. The summary should be corroborated with location

maps and drawings where necessary.

Subassignment 2 - Cost assessment

After an appropriate technical solution is made, which will lead to the goals of investment measures,

the Consultant should ensure that the protection measures, network and facilities are designed in line

with the assumed projection. It also needs to be ensured that the proposed technical solutions are the

best value for money during the operational period of the facilities and network.

The cost assessment should be based on a conceptual solution. An accurate cost assessment is an

important element of the Feasibility Study. It should show clearly unforeseen physical and financial

situations in the course of implementation / construction.

Subassignment 3- Financial analysis

The Consultant will be required to construct a financial model which will cover the exploitation period

of the project (10 year period). The financial model should contain all elements of costs, capital

expenditures, all additional operational costs and maintenance costs.

The analysis of cost recovery should contain an assessment of investment costs, operation and

maintenance and an assessment of expected revenues based on specification of tariffs to be applied to

main user categories (households, commercial, industrial). These revenues should cover, as a

minimum, investment, operation and maintenance costs, as well as costs of depreciation of the

building, assets and equipment.

It will probably be possible to increase tariffs during the project implementation period. There are

specified and acceptable limitations in terms of maximum percentage of the financial load on

households' income (it is usually 3-5% of the household income for water supply services and

collection and treatment of waste waters, based on instructions of the Council of Europe).

The financial system needs to be used to determine appropriate adjustments of policies and

tariffs/prices, which will ensure financial sustainability of water utility company operation, provide

enough room to those providing loans and ensure that tariffs remain within acceptable boundaries and

are raised each year up to acceptable limits. The Consultant should consider impact of all agreed and

specified types of subsidies for socially excluded categories (differential prices according to revenues,

subsidies by the partner municipality...).

Results of the analysis should manifest through several indicators (e.g. financial internal return rate

and net current value). The Consultant should discuss the interpreted indicators generated by the

financial model and stated assumptions with the UNDP/MDG-F, partner municipality, associated

Water Utility Companies and other parties the Consultant thinks need to be involved in this project

phase.

The financial analysis will show sustainability of the proposed investment measures(s) in different

scenarios. It should also contain an assessment of work of the Water Utility Company in charge of

rendering services of water supply and the burden the proposed investment measure(s) can cause with

their financial adjustment. This assessment should contain a projection of cash flow which is based on

a sensible assumption of cost recovery, examine under which circumstances the Water Utility

Company will have sufficient resources to render services, maintain the system and realize

investments in the future.

Subassignment 4 - Economic analysis

The economic impact should be described in a quantifying form, as much as possible. Economic

benefit, together with social, environmental and health benefits, generated by the Project should be



described. If all relevant expenses and benefits could be quantified, the results of the analysis should

be presented with the use of accepted indicators, such as financial and internal return rate, net current

value, and benefit – cost ratio.

It is usually difficult to quantify all economic benefits of an infrastructural project. In this case, other

kinds of quantifying analyses can be used such as multi-criterion analysis and cost effectiveness

analysis.

The cost effectiveness analysis should presume that the Project should achieve the level of rendering

services and standards set by relevant environmental analyses. Therefore, relevant EU standards can

be treated as objective goals that need to be achieved with optimal economic effectiveness during the

operational period of the project.

Subassignment 5 - Preliminary assessment of environmental impact

The preliminary assessment of environmental impact will be performed in accordance with the Rule

Book on production plants requiring a mandatory environmental impact assessment and plants that

may be built and become operational only with an environmental approval.

The Consultant will be obliged to analyse the environmental impact of the works that should be

undertaken within the Project and verify whether the works can lead to soil degradation, jeopardize the

sources and water courses, environment and natural habitats, as well as neighbouring areas.

Subassignment 6 - Implementation plan and strategy

The Consultant will be obliged to prepare an implementation plan and strategy for investment

measure(s) which the study proves to be feasible. The implementation plan should contain:

- Deadlines to carry out implementation measures with mandatory accompanying management and maintenance measures,

- Management of implementation of investment measures,

- Financial plan and funding sources,

- Technical standards and alignment with development projects,

- Public procurement procedures,

- Monitoring and reporting systems.



2.2 POPULATION AND SPATIAL COVERAGE

2.2.1 POPULATION

2.2.1.1 POPULATION OF GIVEN AREA THROUGH HISTORY

Chapter 2.1.1 INTRODUCTORY EXPLANATIONS provides basic information about Petrovo Municipality and municipal settlements. Water Supply Study covers the area of Petrovo Municipality.

Since the last population census was conducted in 1991, there are no precise data on current number of

inhabitants for both municipality and settlements, still, the data obtained from the municipality

authorities can be taken with high degree of certainty. The table below gives population by settlements

for 1991 (list of settlements that stayed within Petrovo Municipality after division of municipality) and

for 2009 (estimate).

The following table shows the number of inhabitants according to the 1991 census, settlements that

belonged as a whole to Petrovo municipality and population estimates for 2010.

Table 1: Population by Settlements in Petrovo Municipality – The 1991 Census and Estimates

for 2010

Seq.

number Settlement 1991Census

Population estimates for 2010

Voters Population

1 Sočkovac 1.121 826 1.120

2 Karanovac 1.178 967 1.311

3 Kakmuž 2.398 1.771 2.402

4 Porječina 819 554 751

5 Krtova 290 293 397

6 Kaluđerica 133 143 194

7 Petrovo Selo 2.919 2.296 3.114

Population Total: 8.858 6.850 9.290

Population is the one of the most important input parameters in all planning documents when it comes

to any kind of calculations/estimates. Unfortunately, population data based on census does not exist,

thus we are dealing here only with the estimates. The last population census was conducted in 1991. In

this way, statistical series of data were lost and if we add to this population movements in the last 20

years conditioned by war and other factors, we can conclude that all the estimates of demographic

development are based on very rough estimates.

Currently, there are around 9.290 inhabitants (4,741M/ 4,549F) in the municipality. Out of this

number 1,196 persons are minors.

The text below gives a short description of local communities.

2.2.1.1.1 PETROVO

Petrovo (former Bosansko Petrovo Selo) is urban settlement in the Petrovo municipality.

The following table provides an overview of population from 1971 to 1991.

Population of Petrovo settlement

Census year 1991 1981 1971

Number of inhabitants 2,919 2,856 2,514

file:///C:/wiki/1991file:///C:/wiki/1981file:///C:/wiki/1971



Currently, in LC Petrovo live 3,114 inhabitants.

2.2.1.1.2 KAKMUŽ

Kakmuž is a village and local community in Petrovo municipality with around 2,400 inhabitants.

Kakmuž village is located on the left side of the river Spreča, at the base of Ozren Mountain. In the

southwest of the settlement is the Mount Volujak (489 m), and through the village flows a small river

Kamenička rijeka, tributary of the river Spreča. The elevation of the village is from 150 to 489 meters.

Kakmuž village is a local community in Petrovo municipality (Republic of Srpska), which covers the

north-eastern part of Ozren mountain. It is bordered by three villages in municipality: Petrovo,

Sočkovac,Kaluđerica. Across the river Spreča, there is the settlement Gračanica which belongs to

Federation of BiH.

Rural district covers an area of 28.4 km². Like other Ozren villages, it consists of lower, plain part in

the valley of Spreča, and upper, in the hills. The settlement is of a spontaneous type and concentrated

on transition between lowland into hilly and mountainous area. It consists of: Pjeskulje, Aluge,

Potočani, Stublić, Bare, Volujak, Sredina, Ivanovići, Mekiljica, Međaš, Lugovi and Slatina.

The river Kamenička rijeka flows through the territory of district, along with several smaller flows,

bigger or smaller streams. In Kakmuž, there are remains of spa "Terme - Ozren", which was before the

last war known for thermo-mineral water suitable for treatment of numerous diseases. During the war,

the spa was severely damaged and now it is out of order. The spa is located near the carbon-dioxide

factory that produces technical gas CO2 from thermo-mineral water. The whole area of Ozren

mountain is known for healing springs and clean air.

The name of the village comes from Kakmuža Odramčića, whose name appears in the charter of

Bosnian Ban Matije Ninoslava in 1269. Village of the same name exist in the east Herzegovina.

The following table gives an overview of population from 1971 to 1991.

Population of Kakmuž settlement

Census year 1991 1981 1971

Number of inhabitants 2,398 2,218 2,020

The current population of Kakmuž makes around 2,400, and population density is 92 inhabitants per

square kilometre. However, this number changes, mostly in negative direction, which was especially

evident in the period since the last war, and even later, caused by economic migrations. The sex

structure of population is such that 51% of the population includes male, and 49% female. Working-

age population aged 18-60 years make up around 57% of total population. Indigenous population of

Ozren and this village has disappeared over time. Part of them was evicted, other part died in

epidemics and wars and among today’s population there are no indigenous residents. Present-day

population settled in this area from various regions.

The village has 780 households.

Doboj - Petrovo regional road and Doboj - Petrovo - Tuzla railway pass through the village.

Population is mainly employed in the town of Doboj.

Kakmuž is one of the few villages in the Mount Ozren which has paved road network and is well

connected to the surrounding villages. The village centre is 5 km far from municipal centre of Petrovo.

All households have electricity and some of the streets are well lit. The village has a water supply

system which consists of seven small independent water supply systems, of which three are managed

by local community, and four some individual househo

Documents

WATER SUPPLY STUDY · 2017. 6. 29. · WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR PETROVO MUNICIPALITY Chapter: Registration 2 Investor: UNDP BIH / MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE Water Supply Study