Upload
truongdien
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Water quality requirements for marine fish cage
site selection in Tenerife (Canary Islands):
predictive modelling and analysis
using GIS
O.M. Perez *, L.G. Ross, T.C. Telfer, L.M. del Campo Barquin
Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK
Received 3 October 2001; received in revised form 4 April 2002; accepted 7 June 2002
Abstract
Site selection is a key factor in any aquaculture operation, affecting both success and
sustainability. The correct choice of site in any aquatic farming operation is vitally important since
it can greatly influence economic viability by determining capital outlay, and, by affecting running
costs, rates of productions and mortality factors. It is impractical to try control water quality
parameters in cage culture systems, therefore culture of any species must be established in
geographical regions having adequate water quality and exchange. This study used GIS and
related technology to build a spatial database using those water quality variables which were
considered to have an influence in developing marine fish-cage culture of seabass and seabream in
Tenerife (Canary Islands). The water quality variables identified were: temperature, turbidity
(runoff soil erosion and sewage), disease stress (sewage) and possibility of waste feedback from
fish-cages (bathymetry). Variables were grouped in a logical model and combined to generate
outputs showing the most suitable areas for siting cage culture. Most areas of the coastline of
Tenerife were identified as being suitable or very suitable, and none was identified as totally
unsuitable. Sensitivity to parameter changes was tested in order to evaluate the model, by
changing one parameter at a time. Values chosen were F 5%, 10% and 15% of the reference
0044-8486/02/$ - see front matter D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00274-0
* Corresponding author. Investigaciones y Servicious Marinos (INSEMAR), San Clemente 14/5j, S/C de
Tenerife 38003, Spain. Tel.: +44-1786-473-171; fax: +44-1786-472-133.
E-mail address: [email protected] (O.M. Perez).
www.elsevier.com/locate/aqua-online
Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–68
situation. This analysis shows that the model was especially sensitive to sea temperature and
suspended solids.
D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Water quality; Cage; Aquaculture; Site selection; GIS; Tenerife
1. Introduction
Any material discharged in to the sea inevitably causes some change in the environ-
ment. Such change may be great or small, long-lasting or transient, wide spread or
extremely localised. If the change can be detected and is regarded as damaging, it
constitutes pollution (Clark, 1998). Pollution of various types is responsible for high fish
mortality in numerous cage farming operations (Beveridge, 1996). Cage culture, as with
any aquaculture venture, requires good water quality, thus water properties strongly affect
the choice of an aquaculture site. Hence, cages should be located in areas uncontaminated
by industrial, municipal and agricultural pollutants. Other water quality parameters, such
as temperature, pH, presence of nitrogenous compounds, dissolved oxygen, etc., should be
within the ranges that provide life support and growth for the cultured species. The correct
choice of sites is vitally important since it influences the economic viability of the facility
(Lawson, 1995). However, the availability of suitable areas for aquaculture is diminishing
because of water quality degradation. Therefore, the first prerequisite for sustainable
aquaculture is an adequate aquaculture resource allocation system. Such a system should
be implemented within the context of an integrated planning approach rather than simply
creating a series of regulations to avoid environmental deterioration. This system should
comprise a flexible adaptable integration of institutional arrangements using tools such as
Geographical Information Systems (GIS), allowing resource allocation.
It is not possible to describe, explain or predict ecosystem behaviour without knowing
how ecosystem components are distributed in time, space or with respect to each other and
understanding the relationships and processes that explain their distribution and behaviour.
As well as requiring knowledge of spatial distribution and relationships, the ability to
make reliable predictions demands knowledge about temporal trends. GIS are powerful
tools that can be used to organise and present spatial data in a way that allows effective
environmental management planning, and hence answers these questions. GIS technology
has been successfully applied in the analysis of the coastal zone to evaluate a number of
environmental problems (Meaille and Wald, 1990; Populus et al., 1995). GIS has several
advantages for aquaculture development programmes, not only providing a visual
inventory of the physical, biological and economical characteristics of the environment,
but also allowing generation of suitability maps for different uses or activities without
complex and time-consuming manipulations. The general usefulness of the methodology
of using GIS for aquaculture site selection has been explored and is now becoming
established (Aguilar-Manjarrez and Ross, 1995; Kapetsky and Nath, 1997; Nath et al.,
2000). The aim of this study was to select the most suitable sites for off-shore marine fish-
cage farming of seabream (Sparus aurata) and seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in Tenerife
(Canary Islands), based on water quality variables. A local sensitivity analysis was carried
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–6852
out to identify the sensitivity of the model to each of the spatial data variables and to
determine their relative criticality.
2. Methodology
2.1. Study area
The Canary Archipelago, composed of seven main islands and several minor ones, is
located in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean between latitude 27.6j–29.5jN and longitude
18.2j–14.5jW, 100 km from the coast northwest edge of Africa (Fig. 1). The archipelago
Fig. 1. The study area, Tenerife, Canary Islands.
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–68 53
emerged from the oceanic basin due to the successive overlay of volcanic material,
forming a set of independent islands with depths of 2000 m between them. The insular
shelf is reduced to only 200 m. Tenerife is the largest island of the Archipelago with an
area of 2036 km2, as well as having the longest coastline, 358 km. The island is a
triangular pyramid with a truncated apex at an altitude of 2000 m, from which the volcano
Teide rises to 3718 m. The volcanic origin of the island is responsible for the coast and
seabed topography, which generally can be described as abrupt and very uneven.
Both the particular oceanographic conditions, such as the Canary Current (a branch of
the Gulf Stream) and the seabed morphology, govern the marine environment in Tenerife.
The Canary Current is a cold surface current that flows in SSW direction, and is stronger
within the top 200 m (Fiekas et al., 1992). Outside of the island’s influence, its mean
velocity is about 15 cm s� 1, but when it passes between the islands it may reach mean
values of 25 cm s� 1 (Molina et al., 1996). The sea surface temperatures in the archipelago
annually range between 17 and 25 jC, and salinity is very stable, with values ranging from36–37x. Nutrient concentrations (phosphate, nitrate, nitrite, silicate and ammonium) are
very low in the euphotic zone (Braun et al., 1982), indicating the oligotrophic condition of
the waters.
At present there are only four cage farms, all located in the leeward part of the island,
although there are several projects for new sites planned for the near future. They are all
small-scale cage operations growing seabream (S. aurata), which is an introduced species
in Tenerife.
2.2. General methodology
A schematic diagram showing the logical steps involved is shown in Fig. 2. The first
stage of the study was to identify the most important water quality variables that were
considered to have any influence in developing marine fish-cage (seabass and seabream)
aquaculture in Tenerife. Once these variables were identified, satellite images, maps,
statistics and archive material were used to build up the spatial database. All data
integrated into the database needed some manipulation and reclassification to create the
final thematic maps in a common framework. Subsequent manipulations focused on
registering each thematic map to a common coordinate system, and on scoring the
thematic maps in terms of their suitability for aquaculture development in Tenerife. In this
study a scoring system of 1 to 8 was chosen, 8 being the most suitable and 1 the least.
Models were then built to identify the most suitable areas in Tenerife for cage farming. Fig.
3 shows the four submodels proposed. Either simple overlays or Multi-Criteria Evaluation
(MCE) were used to combine the variables of each model. In MCE, an attempt is made to
combine a set of criteria (using a particular weight for each) to achieve a single composite
basis for a decision according to a specific objective. Finally, MCE was used to combine
the four submodels to generate a final output.
2.3. Identification of the most important water quality variables
From all possible aquaculture water quality parameters (Lawson, 1995), only the most
important influencing cage culture development in Tenerife were reviewed. Because of the
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–6854
conservative nature of the marine environment and the oligotrophic nature of oceanic
water, water quality variables such as dissolved oxygen, total alkalinity, total hardness, pH,
nitrogenous compounds and hydrogen sulphide are considered of little importance here.
Salinity remains almost constant at 36–37xand was assumed, therefore, to be consistent
throughout. On the other hand, possible pollutants such as hydrocarbons, heavy metals and
pesticides have a strong potential influence and temperature and turbidity are also of great
importance.
Tenerife is located in an area of high oil tanker traffic, and thus has the potential for
hydrocarbon pollution. In addition, the Canary Current and Trade Winds could bring in
this pollutant even if originating far away from the island’s coasts. However, the sporadic
and localised nature of this poses little threat to cage culture (Pena-Mendez et al., 1996b,
1999). Despite the great concern about the effects of heavy metals on aquatic life and on
organisms higher in the food chain, there are very few studies on concentration of heavy
metals in the coastal areas around Tenerife. Dıaz et al. (1990) conducted a study in the
coastal waters around Santa Cruz de Tenerife city and concluded that, although the
presence of heavy metals in this area might be the highest in the island, they are not
considered as ‘‘polluted waters’’. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) compounds can be
taken up by fish via water or also accumulate via the food chain. Pena-Mendez et al.
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of the steps involved in the development of this study.
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–68 55
(1996a) determined the content of seven individual PCB congeners in specimens of a
marine winkle (Ossilinus atratus) and limpet (Patella ullisiponensis aspera) in Tenerife,
which can indicate compliance with legislative food standards. The authors concluded that
in Tenerife coastal areas the seven PCB congers are present at low levels. Furthermore,
most of the samples showed either undetectable and/or non-quantifiable concentrations of
these congeners. No significant differences where found between sampling sites along the
coast. Therefore, it can be concluded that PCB contamination in Tenerife coastal
environments is not a problem for cage culture.
The water quality variables identified as greatly influencing cage siting in Tenerife were
temperature, turbidity (runoff and sewage), disease stress (sewage) and possibility of waste
feedback from the cage (bathymetry). Water temperature is the environmental parameter
that has the greatest effect on fish (Lawson, 1995), and can be thought of as a primary
factor affecting the economic feasibility of a commercial aquaculture venture. Temper-
atures on either side of the optimum can induce stress in the animal, affecting feeding,
growth, reproduction and disease inhibition. Turbidity produced by dissolved and
suspended substances, such as clay particles, humic substances, silt plankton, etc., can
be troublesome in fish (Lawson, 1995). Due to the oligotrophic nature of the waters in
Tenerife, the major source of turbidity comes from sporadic runoff episodes. Excessive
runoff coming from the watersheds can often cause clay and silt loads to exceed tolerable
limits for farmed fish. These particles can clog the gills of small fish and/or stress bigger
fish. Suspended solids at sufficiently high concentrations can cause gill damage and may
trigger diseases as a result of fish stress. Sewage discharges could also be hazardous for
cage culture development. Urban sewage is principally organic but also contains consid-
erable amounts of metals, oils and grease, detergents and industrial wastes. All human
Fig. 3. Flowchart showing relationships of submodels.
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–6856
sewage also contains enteric bacteria, viruses and the eggs of intestinal parasites. Formerly,
it was believed that pathogenic bacteria and viruses did not survive in seawater. However,
it has been shown that bacteria may enter a dormant phase so that they cannot be detected
by normal methods and viruses can be very persistent in seawater (Clark, 1998). Seafood
organisms that do not filter feed, such as most crustaceans and fish, do not accumulate
pathogens from sewage-contaminated water and are unlikely to represent a direct health
risk from this source (Clark, 1998). However, poor environmental conditions (from
sewage discharges) leading to fish stress may produce physiological or metabolic changes
in the fish which may increase the sensitivity of fish to other pollutants, increasing
moralities and reducing profits (Hedrick, 1998). Sewage-polluted sites should, therefore,
be avoided completely. Finally, a third possible source of water quality deterioration could
come from the cages itself. Of all the wastes released by marine fish farms into the
environment, particulate organic waste in the form of uneaten feed and faeces are usually
the most significant fraction (Beveridge, 1996). This material, which generally settles on
the seabed near to the cages, provides a net input of organic carbon and nitrogen to the
sediments, thus, the accumulation of waste can cause major changes in the benthic
community and may exceed the environment’s capacity to bioprocess this material
(Hargrave, 1994). Environmental deterioration due to high organic matter concentrations
in the sediments may affect the health of farmed fishes and hence profitability (Beveridge,
1996). Hence, floating cages should be located at sites where the water depth is sufficient
to maximise water exchange and to keep cage bottoms well clear of substrate at low tide,
and so, knowledge of the bathymetry is also an important factor.
2.4. Database generation and modelling
2.4.1. Sea temperature
Tenerife has very favourable sea temperatures (17–25 jC) for culture of seabass and
seabream, therefore, temperature is not a constraint. However, it is desirable to identify
those areas with the highest annual average temperature, which will enhance fish growth
and therefore reduce the growing cycle and production costs. It is impractical to take in
situ simultaneous and continuous sea temperature measurements around Tenerife, and so,
AVHRR sensor measurements on board NOAA-14 satellite were used for this study. A set
of approximately four NOAA-14 AVHRR images per month, with minimum cloud
coverage, was obtained from 1997 to 2000. A total of 135 satellite images, each composed
by five spectral bands, were provided already radiometrically corrected by the Center for
Reception, Processing, Archiving and Dissemination of Earth Observation Data and
Products (CREPAD; Canary Islands).
The accuracy of satellite observations of sea surface temperature retrievals is critically
dependent upon the ability of satellite radiometers to view the sea surface unobstructed by
cloud. Therefore, images were processed for cloud detection and elimination using
ERDAS 8.3.1 software. For this study, a modification of the Saunders and Kriebel
(1988) technique was used to optimise its functionality to Tenerife. The sequence of steps
to identify cloud free pixels was reduced to three tests from the usual five. Tests 2 and 3
were omitted because of their bad performance in detecting cloudy pixels over coastal
areas (Saunders, 1986).
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–68 57
The determination of SST from cloud-free satellite images was performed by means of
multi-channel algorithms using channels 4 and 5 of AVHRR. This study made use of the
latest state-of-the-art SST algorithm for the Canary region developed by Arbelo et al.
(2000). This algorithm has been validated with field data, and its standard deviation is 0.4
jK (Arbelo, personal communication). The split-window equation is:
SST ¼ 1:0186 T4 þ 1:2348ðT4 � T5Þ þ 1:3178ðT4 � T5Þðsech � 1Þ � 4:4616
where: SST = sea surface temperature; T4 = brightness temperature in channel 4;
T5 = brightness temperature in channel 5; h = satellite scan angle.
The SST algorithm was applied to each of the cloud-free images, creating a set of 135
SST images. The final processing step was the georeferencing of these images. Georefer-
encing involves precise transformation of the image from the sensor-based projection to an
earth surface-based projection by matching ground- and image-based control points, and
transforming and resampling the data to a map projection coordinate system. Images were
georeferenced to latitude–longitude. All sea surface temperature images were combined to
generate a composite map, which is used to generate average values of sea surface
temperature. This image was reclassified according to suitability scores. Fig. 4a shows the
final average SST suitability map.
2.4.2. Sediments (runoff)
This study only focused on runoff-sediments, which are the main contributing source of
sediments to the sea in Tenerife. Of the methods available, the Universal Soil Loss
Equation (USLE), in both its original and modified forms, is perhaps the most widely
applied of the empirical approaches in which predictive equations are developed from
analyses of source data (Kertesz, 1993). The USLE requires an estimated value for the
factor R, which depends upon each rainfall intensity period of a storm. Williams (1975)
and Williams and Berndt (1977) modified the USLE by replacing the R factor with a
runoff factor. The modification is based on the assumption that the total discharge and
peak discharge rate resulting from a storm on the watershed depend upon the duration,
amount and intensity of the storm. The equation was developed to estimate sediment yield
at the outlet of a watershed directly, rather than soil loss, on a storm-by-storm basis. The
modified equation (MUSLE) is:
Y ¼ 11:8ðVqpÞ0:56KCPðLSÞ
where Y is the mean soil loss (tons), V is the storm runoff (m3), qp is the peak flow rate (m3
s� 1), K is the soil erodibility factor for a specific soil horizon, C is a dimensionless
cropping management factor (expressed as a ratio of soil loss from the condition of interest
to soil loss from tilled continuous fallow), P is an erosion control practice factor
(expressed as a ratio of the soil loss with the practices to soil loss with farming up and
down the slope) and LS is the topographic factor, a combined dimensionless factor for
slope length and slope gradient. Full integration of this equation in GIS (each variable
from the MUSLE equation was created as a thematic map) made it possible to calculate the
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–6858
soil loss for each individual grid cell (Fig. 3). The level of detail (10� 10-m pixel) made it
possible to take into account the high spatial variability of the landscape.
The data input for this equation came from the following sources and calculations. Values
for runoff (V) came from the NRCS Runoff Curve Number method, detailed in NEH-4
Fig. 4. Suitability maps for criteria used in modelling water quality for sitting cage culture in Tenerife where 8 is
most suitable and 1 least suitable. (a) Sea surface temperature suitability map. (b) Potential sediment yield
suitability map. (c) Sewage suitability map. (d) Bathymetry suitability map. (e) Overall water quality suitability
map. (For each score the suitable area is shown in km2). A zoom window is shown in some maps.
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–68 59
(USDA-SCS, 1986). The rain data used were the maximum P24 (the 24-h rainfall amount).
The method for approximating peak discharge ( pq) (Tabular Hydrograph method) is based
on that proposed by USDA-SCS (1973) and USDA-SCS (1986). The soil erodibility factor
(K) is a measure of the intrinsic ability of soil to erode, and thus varies as a function of soil
type. Data fromRodriguez et al. (1993) were used to determine theK factor corresponding to
each soil type. According to the authors, soils in Tenerife vary between considerably
Fig. 4 (continued).
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–6860
resistant (Ultisols, Alfisols, Vertisols, Entisols, Sorribas and Inceptisols) (K = 0.10–0.25)
and fairly sensitive (Aridisols) (K = 0.25–0.35). C represents the ratio of soil loss under a
given vegetation canopy to that from bare soil. The C factor values used were those
presented by Zhou (1998). The conservation practice factor, P, was determined by the extent
of conservation practices such as strip cropping, contouring and terracing practices, which
tend to decrease the erosive capabilities of rainfall and runoff. In general, because the land
slopes are small and the infiltration rates are high for the farms (mostly banana) in Tenerife,
Dıaz-Dıaz et al. (1998) concluded that surface runoff could be set to zero in these areas, and
so P was set to a value of one. The LS factor was computed with the Wischmeier and Smith
(1978) equation. Based on elevations in the Digital Elevation Model (DEM), the IDRISI
command SLOPE was used to generate a raster map showing the spatial distribution of
slopes (S). The slope length coverage was produced by developing a flow direction grid
(using the module ASPECT) following the technique of Niedermeier (1998).
The final steps were to run the module DISTANCE to measure distances from the
stream mouth, and then to reclassify the sediment yields according to their suitability. Fig.
4b shows the final suitability map for this variable.
2.4.3. Sewage
Unfortunately, there are no direct measurements of the quantity or quality of sewage
discharges from the island. Therefore, to quantify the suitability of cage culture in areas
close to sewage discharges, three factors were considered to characterise a sewage outfall
(domestic outfalls, with no industrial discharges); these were: number of people connected
to each sewage pipeline system, the presence or absence of any treatment before the
sewage is dumped, and the depth of the discharge. The number of people connected to each
Fig. 4 (continued).
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–68 61
pipeline network determined the quantity of sewage that each pipe discharged to the sea.
The presence or absence of any pre-discharge treatment determined its potential hazard.
The depth of the sewage dump provided information on the likelihood of the discharge
reaching the surface, and dilution time (dilution factor). When the mixed layer is
sufficiently shallow, plumes from the sewer outfalls are often trapped within the
thermocline. At other times, the mixed layer is sufficiently deep or does not exist, so no
trapping occurs. Under such conditions, at least a portion of the discharge undoubtedly
reaches the surface.
The number of people connected to each sewage (variable described as ‘‘population’’)
was determined by using a population map for each of the 743 Population District and the
sanitation network. The presence or absence of any treatment before sewage discharge was
determined using a map showing their location and connection to the sanitation network.
The depth of discharge of each pipe was determined by combination of the sewage-pipe
layer and the bathymetric map. Discharges that might occur above the seasonal thermocline
(100–150 m in mid summer and 15 m winter–spring; de-Armas, personal communication)
were considered potentially dangerous. MCE was used to combine the three variables
described above and, hence, determine which sewage pipelines present a higher threat to
fish farming development. Each variable was weighted as shown in Fig. 3. It was
considered that sewage treatment prior discharge was the most important variable, followed
by the number of people connected to the sewage (population), and finally the depth of the
discharge. The final step was to run the module DISTANCE to measure distances from the
pipes, and reclassify according to their suitability. Fig. 4c shows the final suitability map for
this variable.
2.4.4. Bathymetry
A set of four bathymetric charts (1:50,000) were digitised on a CalComp Drawing
Board III using Cartalinx 1.2 software. The digitised contours were exported to IDRISI
and linear interpolation between contours was used to produce a faceted model (complete
bathymetry surface).
Floating cages should be located at sites where the water depth is sufficient to keep
cage bottoms well clear or substrate, avoiding possible harmful feedback from wasted
material accumulated on the seabed. Bearing this in mind, the bathymetric map was
reclassified into to suitable zones (Fig. 4d).
2.4.5. Final output
The four submodels assembled to identify the most suitable areas for cage culture in
Tenerife were combined using another MCE (Fig. 3). However, to minimise the cost of
mooring, the extent of potential suitable area for cage culture was limited to depths bellow
50 m, assuming the cages were 20 m deep. The total available area was about 250 km2.
Fig. 4e shows the final model output generated for depths inferior to 50 m. For each class
the suitable area (km2) is shown.
2.4.6. Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis (SA) is the study of how the variation in the output of a model can
be apportioned, qualitatively or quantitatively, to different sources of variation (Malczew-
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–6862
ski, 1999; Saltelli et al., 2000). SA aims to ascertain how the model depends upon the
information fed into it, upon its structure and upon the framing assumptions made to build
it. Local SAwas the method chosen here because it gives an idea of the factors that mostly
contribute to the output variability. Local SA computes partial derivatives of the output
functions with respect to the input variables (differential analysis). In order to compute the
derivative numerically, the input parameters are varied within a small interval around a
nominal value. The interval is not related to degree of knowledge of the variables and is
usually the same for all of the variables. In this study, interval values of F 5%, 10% and
15% of the reference values were chosen.
The model variables considered in the SA were sewage, sea surface temperature (SST)
and sediments. These variables were varied and the resulting changes in the number of
square kilometers under each suitability class were examined to evaluate the sensitivity of
the results to variations in the input parameters (Table 1). Fig. 5 shows the differences
between the area in square kilometers, under each suitability class, from the baseline
model for each of the changed variables. Absolute Sensitivity (S), a mathematical
Table 1
Sensitivity analysis for temperature, sediment and sewage
Suitability scores 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Baseline model 0 2.27 4.49 15.88 12.02 51.75 32.76 156.52
Temperature
+ 15% 0 3.05 5.75 16.35 11.12 55.23 31.06 153.12
+ 10% 0 1.30 4.76 15.25 10.08 48.42 31.71 164.17
+ 5% 0 0.33 5.48 14.73 9.22 48.22 30.64 167.06
� 5% 0 2.79 4.49 16.85 11.03 56.66 31.13 152.75
� 10% 0 3.40 6.24 17.79 9.45 62.79 27.18 148.84
� 15% 0 3.92 6.37 18.03 11.51 65.31 151.44 19.11
Sediments
+ 15% 0 2.50 4.81 15.97 12.18 62.31 35.04 142.89
+ 10% 0 2.28 4.71 15.65 12.04 56.29 34.39 150.34
+ 5% 0 2.22 4.71 15.56 12.02 54.92 33.73 152.52
� 5% 0 2.08 4.36 15.21 12.23 48.96 31.28 161.57
� 10% 0 1.83 4.29 14.93 12.59 48.55 32.25 161.24
� 15% 0 1.46 3.81 14.77 13.37 44.24 30.14 167.88
Sewage
(population)
+ 15% 0 2.49 4.68 16.37 12.28 51.17 32.87 155.82
+ 10% 0 2.49 4.68 16.37 12.28 51.17 32.87 155.82
+ 5% 0 2.27 4.51 16.18 12.23 51.8 32.87 155.82
� 5% 0 2.27 4.5 15.9 12.03 51.66 32.32 157.01
� 10% 0 2.27 4.5 15.9 12.03 51.66 32.32 157.01
� 15% 0 2.27 4.5 15.9 12.03 50.99 32.06 157.94
Each variable was altered by F 5%, 10% and 15% and the resulting changes in the number of square kilometers
for each suitability score calculated. The number of square kilometers for each suitability score for the baseline
model is shown for reference.
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–68 63
Fig. 5. Differences between the area under each suitability class and the baseline model for each of the changed
variables; (a) sea temperature, (b) suspended solids, and (c) sewage discharges.
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–6864
expression of sensitivity which provides a consistent measure for comparing the selected
model parameters (Shukla, 1998), was also calculated for all the variables as
S ¼ ðRa � RnÞ=ðPa � PnÞ
where Ra and Rn were the model response for altered and nominal parameters, and Pa and Pn
were the altered and nominal parameters. The S values for different parameters were
compared to identify sensitive parameters. Absolute sensitivity provided a consistent
measure for comparing various model parameters. Based on the calculated S values,
variables can be arranged in the following order for their importance in affecting water
quality suitability area: SST>sediments>sewage. Overall, the water quality model was
shown to be highly sensitive to SST and sediments. The model was more sensitive to lower
values of SST than higher values of this variable. On the other hand, the model was more
sensitive to higher values of sediments and sewage than lower values of these two variables.
3. Discussion and conclusions
Although a larger number of variables could be used for cage siting (Beveridge, 1996),
this study only focused on those controlling water quality. It is impractical to try to control
water quality parameters in cage culture systems, therefore culture of any species must be
conducted in areas that have adequate water quality prior to the establishment of the farm.
Four water quality variables were identified as greatly influencing cage culture in Tenerife;
temperature, turbidity (runoff and sewage), risk of diseases (sewage) and possible waste
feedback from the cages (bathymetry).
From the 250 km2 of available coastal area (using only that area above the 50 m depth
isobaths), most was identified as being suitable (score 7) and very-suitable (score 8),
respectively. There were very few areas with low scores (scores 2, 3 and 4), and none was
identified as totally unsuitable (score 1). These areas are located where sewage or high
suspended solid loadings may have occurred.
A mathematical model is defined by a series of equations, input factors, parameters and
variables aimed to characterize the process being investigated. Input is subject to many
sources of uncertainty including errors of measurement, absence of information and poor
or partial understanding of the driving forces and mechanisms. This imposes a limit on our
confidence in the response or output of the model. Further, models may have to cope with
the natural intrinsic variability of the system such as the occurrence of stochastic events.
Modelling requires an evaluation of the confidence of the proposed model, possibly
assessing the uncertainties associated with the modelling process and with the outcome of
the model itself. Possible sources of inaccuracy in the present model were the use of
satellite images to derive sea temperature and the use of the USLE for estimation of
potential sediment yield.
The use of NOAA–AVHRR satellite images provided the opportunity of creating an
average sea surface temperature (SST) map, which could not have been achieved by other
means. However, despite all possible advantages using AVHRR images, there are some
points of concern when working with AVHRR-derived SSTs. The SST measurement is of
the surface temperature, and not the bulk temperature (Schuluesso et al., 1990). Most
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–68 65
successful uses of SST data concentrate on identifying spatial temperature gradients rather
than absolute temperature values. The modelling of the topographic potential for erosion
was done by applying the very common USLE equation. However, some authors have
argued its limitation when applied to complex topographic conditions (Mitasova et al.,
1997), and exclusion of depositional areas.
Sensitivity to parameter changes was tested in order to evaluate the model. The analysis
was done by changing SST, sewage and sediments variables at a time. Values chosen were
F 5%, 10% and 15% as in the reference situation. A considerable level of variation was
found in the results when the model parameters were varied. The sensitivity analysis shows
that the model was especially sensitive to sea temperature and sediments, respectively.
There is a growing need for complex analyses of the coastal zone because of the
mounting barrage of threats created by intensive and diverse human activities. One of the
potentially useful tools for this kind of analysis is GIS. GIS are powerful tools that can be
used to organise and present spatial data in a way that allows effective environmental
management planning. GIS technology in aquaculture has been used now for about 15
years and there are several advantages for aquaculture development programs. However,
GIS does not provide a definitive answer to a given problem, rather, it generates outputs to
a range of input data. What it does provide is an aid to support decisions of managers built
up with the outputs from the GIS, and perhaps other related material. This study selected
the most suitable areas for aquaculture in terms of their water quality, and has suggested
limits to where aquaculture can be placed. However, those sites that are identified as more
suitable should be further investigated if any aquaculture operation were to be developed.
The model presented here could be modified by expert panels in the near future, so as to
fine-tune the model.
Overall, the methodology adopted in this study was able to identify the most suitable
areas for cage farming in Tenerife based on water quality. Sensitivity analysis revealed
that considerable changes in the model could result from the uncertainties associated
with the input parameter estimation. The reliability of the results predicted by the
methodology used in this study would, therefore, mainly be a function of the extent to
which the estimated input parameters represent the field situation. As expected, no
totally unsuitable sites for cage farming were identified. This is because Tenerife has
very favourable environmental conditions for culture of marine fish because of its clean
and well-oxygenated waters, favourable temperatures for growth (17–25% jC) and
stable oceanic salinity (36–37x). Most of the areas were identified as being suitable
and very suitable.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the assistance of CREPAD for providing the AVHRR satellite images
and their support during the image processing. Also, we acknowledge Dr. Manuel Arbelo
for his valuable suggestions and guidelines in the AVHRR processing. We extend our
gratitude to Tenerife Council for the valuable use of their CD-MAP information. This work
was carried out as part of a training project financed by the EC under the FAIR program (GT
973516).
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–6866
References
Aguilar-Manjarrez, J.A., Ross, L.G., 1995. Geographical information system (GIS) environmental models for
aquaculture development in Sinaloa State, Mexico. Aquaculture International 3, 103–115.
Arbelo, M., Hernandez-Leal, J.P., Dıaz, F.J., Exposito, F.H., 2000. Efficiency of a global algorithm for retrieving
SST from satellites data in a subtropical region. Advances in Space Research 25 (5), 1041–1044.
Beveridge, M.C.M., 1996. Cage Aquaculture, 2nd ed. Fishing News Books, Oxford. 346 pp.
Braun, J.G., Real, F., de Armas, J.D., 1982. Production studies in Canary Islands waters. In: Hempel, G. (Ed.),
The Canary Current: Studies of an Upwelling System. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea,
11–14 April 1978, Las Palmas, Spain, pp. 219–220.
Clark, R.B., 1998. Marine Pollution. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 161 pp.
Dıaz, C., Galindo, L., Garcia-Montelongo, F., Larrechi, M.S., Rius, F.X., 1990. Metals in coastal waters of Santa
Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands. Marine Pollution Bulletin 21 (2), 91–95.
Dıaz-Dıaz, R.J.E., Garcıa, H., Loague, K., 1998. Leaching potentials of four pesticides used for bananas in the
Canary Islands. Journal of Environmental Quality 27, 562–572.
Fiekas, V., Elken, J., Muller, T.J., Aitsam, A., Zenk, W., 1992. A view of the Canary Basin thermocline circulation
in winter. Journal of Geophysical Research 97 (C8), 12495–12510.
Hargrave, B.T., 1994. A benthic enrichment index. In: Hargrave, B.T. (Ed.), Modelling Benthic Impacts of
Organic Enrichment from Marine Aquaculture. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,
Canada, pp. 79–91.
Hedrick, R.P., 1998. Relationships of the host, pathogen, and environment: implications for diseases of cultured
and wild fish populations. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 10, 107–111.
Kapetsky, J.M., Nath, S.S., 1997. A strategic assessment of the potential for freshwater fish farming in Latin
America. FAO: COPESCAL Technical Paper 10, Rome, 128 pp.
Kertesz, A., 1993. Application of GIS methods in soil erosion modelling. Computers, Environment and Urban
Systems 17 (3), 233–238.
Lawson, T.B., 1995. Fundamentals of Aquacultural Engineering. Chapman & Hall, New York. 355 pp.
Malczewski, J., 1999. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 392 pp.
Meaille, R., Wald, L., 1990. A geographical information system for some Mediterranean benthic communities.
International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 4, 79–86.
Mitasova, H.S.H., Zlocha, M., Iverson, L., 1997. Reply to comment by Desmet and Govers. International Journal
of Geographical Information Science 11 (6), 611–618.
Molina, R., Cabanas, J.M., Laatzen, F.L., 1996. Hydrography and currents in the Canary Region; Cruise Canarias
9205. Boletin del Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia 12 (1), 43–51.
Nath, S.S., Bolte, J.P., Ross, L.G., Aguilar-Manjarrez, J., 2000. Applications of geographical information systems
(GIS) for spatial decision support in aquaculture. Aquacultural Engineering 23, 233–278.
Niedermeier, C., 1998. Soil erosion modeling using GIS (http://www.crwr.utexas.edu/gis/gishydro99/class/
niedermeier/term.htm).
Pena-Mendez, E.M., Astorga-Espana, M.S., Garcia-Montelongo, F.J., 1996a. Polychlorinated biphenyls in two
mollusc species from the coast of Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain). Chemosphere 32 (12), 2371–2380.
Pena-Mendez, E., Conde, J.E., Montelongo, F.G., 1996b. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and n-alkanes in
Osilinus attratus from the coast of Tenerife (Canary Islands). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology 57 (5), 803–810.
Pena-Mendez, E.M., Astorga-Espana, M.S., Garcia-Montelongo, F.J., 1999. Interpretation of analytical data on
n-alkanes and polynucleararomatic hydrocarbons in Arbacia lixula from the coasts of Tenerife (Canary
Islands, Spain) by multivariate data analysis. Chemosphere 39 (13), 2259–2270.
Populus, J., Moreau, F., Coquelet, D., Xavier, J., 1995. An assessment of environmental sensitivity to marine
pollutions: solution with remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS). International Journal of
Remote Sensing 1, 3–15.
Rodriguez, A.R., Gonzales, S.M.C., Hernandez, H.L.A., Mendoza, J.C.C., Gonzalez, O.M.J., Padron, P.P.A.,
Cabrera, J.M.T., Chavez, G.E.V., 1993. Assessment of soil degradation in the Canary Islands (Spain). Land
Degradation & Rehabilitation 4 (1), 11–20.
Saltelli, A., Chan, K., Scott, E.M., 2000. Sensitivity analysis. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Great Britain. 475 pp.
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–68 67
Saunders, R.W., 1986. An automated scheme for the removal of cloud contamination from AVHRR radiances
over western Europe. International Journal of Remote Sensing 7 (7), 867–886.
Saunders, R.W., Kriebel, K.T., 1988. An improved method for detecting clear sky and cloudy radiances from
AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 9 (1), 123–150.
USDA-SCS (US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service), 1973. A Method for Estimating Volume
and Rate of Runoff in Small Watersheds. ASDA, USA. 19 pp.
USDA-SCS (US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service), 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small
Watersheds (Tech. Release 55) ASDA, USA. 160 pp.
Williams, J.R., 1975. Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. Water Resources Bulletin 11 (5), 965–974.
Williams, J.R., Berndt, H.D., 1977. Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. Transactions of the
ASAE 20 (6), 1100–1104.
Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D., 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses—A Guide to Conservation Planning.
Agricultural Handbook, vol. 537. US Department of Agriculture. 58 pp.
Zhou, Q., 1998. Exercise 8: environmental modelling (http://www.geog.hkbu.edu.hk/QZone/Teaching/
GEOG3142/exer-08.html#landsystems).
O.M. Perez et al. / Aquaculture 224 (2003) 51–6868