Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Water Quality of Rivers at Interstate Borders
CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
(Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, Govt. of India)
‘Parivesh Bhawan’, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi – 110032 Website: www.cpcb.nic.in
e-mail: [email protected]
INTERSTATE RIVER BOUNDARY MONITORING PROGARMME
SERIES: IRBM/01/2015
DEDICATED TEAM
Overall Supervision Dr. A.B.Akolkar Member Secretary
and Co-ordination Sh. R.M. Bhardwaj Scientist ‘D’
Sh. A K Sinha Scientist ‘D’
Report Preparation Sh. A K Sinha Scientist ‘D’
Sh. Vishal Gandhi Scientist ‘C’
Sh. Jitendra Kr Vimal Senior Research Fellow
Ms. Himani Ravish Project Trainee
Data Entry Sh. R.D.Swami Data Entry Operator
Dedicated Monitoring and Inspection team
Team from ZO Lucknow Sh. P.K.Mishra, Scientist ‘E’
Dr. D.K. Soni Scientist ‘D’
Sh. J.P.Meena Scientist ‘C’
Dr.H.P.S.Rathore Scientist ‘C’
Sh A.K.Tripathi, SSA
Team from ZO Bhopal
Sh. R.S.Kori Scientist ‘E’
Sh. P. Jagan, Scientist ‘C’
Sh. Anil Rawat, SSA
Dr.Y.K.Saxena, SSA
Dr.Anoop Chaturvedi, JSA
Sh. Sunil Kolhtkar, JLA
Team from ZO Vadodara Sh. B. R Naidu Scientist ‘E’
Sh. Shashikant Lokhande Scientist ‘D’
Sh. Amit R. Thakkar Scientist ‘C’
Sh. N. Semwal SSA
Sh. T.K. Parmar SLA
Team from ZO Kolkata Sh. R.K.Saxena Scientist ‘D’
Dr Rita Shah Scientist ‘D’
Team from ZO Bangalore Sh. S. Suresh Scientist ‘D’
Sh. V. Pattusami Scientist ‘E’
Team from ZO Shilong Sh. Z. Changson Scientist ‘D’
Table of Contents
Chapter No.
Chapter Name Page No.
1. Introduction 1-5
2. Interstate River Boundary Monitoring Network 6-9
3. Methodology 10
4. Water Quality of Rivers 11-19
5. Status of Water Quality 20-24
6. Assessment of Water Quality at Interstate Points 25-31
7. Water Quality Trend 32-128
8. Conclusion 129
9. Action Taken 130-132
10. Recommendations 133
List of Tables and Graphs
S. No. Table/Graph Name Page No.
Table 1 Major Interstate Water Disputes in India 4
Table 2 Disputed Interstate Rivers and States Sharing the
River Boundaries
4
Table 3 List of Water Quality Monitoring Locations at
Interstate Boundaries
6-9
Table 4 State Wise Distribution of Monitoring Stations 9
Table 5 Statistical Summary of Water Quality Data 16-19
Table 6 Observed Range of Water Quality Parameters 20-24
Table 7 Prescribed Standard for BOD, DO, TDS and TC 25
Table 8 Profile of Water Quality for Last Four Years 37-31
Pie Chart 1 Percentage Wise Variation in BOD Values 25
Pie Chart 2 Percentage Wise Variation in DO Values 26
Pie Chart 3 Percentage Wise Variation in TDS Values 26
Pie Chart 4 Percentage Wise Variation in TC Values 27
Graphs Water Quality Trend 32-128
1
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Availability of Water Resources
The availability and the quality of the fresh water resources is the most pressing of the many
environmental challenges on the national horizon in India. The stress on water resources is
from multiple sources and the impacts can take diverse forms. Geometric increase in
population coupled with rapid urbanization, industrialization and agricultural development
has resulted in high impact on quality and quantity of water in India. The urban population
has increased almost 11 fold in last 100 year period from 26 million to 285 million.
Unregulated growth of urban areas, particularly over the last two decades, without
infrastructural services for proper collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of
domestic wastes led to increased pollution & health hazards. The municipalities and such
other civic authorities have not been able to cope up with this massive task which could be
due to various reasons including erosion of authority, inability to raise revenues and
inadequate managerial capabilities. That is why it became necessary to launch the Ganga
Action Plan and subsequently the National River Action Plan, which is essentially addressed
to the task of trapping, diversion and treatment of municipal waste water. The situation
warrants immediate redressal through radically improved water resource and water quality
management strategies.
Depletion of available freshwater resources, falling ground water levels and deteriorating
water quality are all posing a variety of challenges in managing India’s water resources.
Competing demands from the needs of a growing population are quite often leading towards
disputes among users. The per capita water availability in India is raising concerns.
By the increase in population by the end of 21st century, the per capita availability is likely to
drop below 1000 cubic meters a situation labeled as water scarcity. From the East to the West
and from the North to the South, water has defined life in the Indian subcontinent for
thousands of years. On an average, the combination of rainfall, surface and groundwater
resources have been sufficient in providing adequate water to the Indian population. Rise in
demand and development pressures are changing the characteristics of water in India. Erosion
in the watershed due to the fast growing development and poor land management practices is
changing stream hydraulics. Groundwater reserves are becoming more and more depleted as
surface water sources have become too polluted for human use.
Water security is emerging as an increasingly important and vital issue for India. Many
Indian cities are beginning to experience moderate to severe water shortages, brought on by
the effects of agricultural growth, industrialization and urbanization. Population stress,
irrigation requirements and industrialization are the major pressures for water insecurity. The
environmental challenges of water resource development and management in India are
expected to manifest themselves more rapidly in the coming years. These environmental
challenges may be addressed through four broad approaches (1) Improving efficiencies and
minimizing losses (2) Recharging groundwater aquifers (3) Abatement and treatment of
water pollution (4) Reuse and recycling of wastewater (Status of Water Quality in India-
2011, CPCB ( Series: MINARS/35/2013-14).
2
1.1.1 Current and Future Water Requirements
In 1990, the total water withdrawal was estimated at 552 bcm i.e. 30 per cent of the country's
renewable water resources. The contribution from surface water was 362 bcm, while the
groundwater withdrawal was estimated at 190 bcm. Approximately 460 bcm was used for
irrigation while 25 bcm was used for domestic needs. About 19 bcm and 15 bcm were used
for energy and industrial purposes respectively. Currently, more than 80 per cent of the 750
bcm water used in India is for irrigation. The balance 20 per cent is used to meet domestic,
energy, industrial and other requirements. With the rapidly growing population, along with
industrial and urbanization activities, the demand for water is expected to increase even
faster. Estimates indicate that by the year 2025, the total water demand of 1050 bcm will be
very close to the total utilizable water resources of 1,122 bcm in the country. Though
projections are not available beyond 2025, it is evident that the country may have to face an
acute water crisis unless clear and strategic measures are adopted now. It is important to note
that more attention is also required to scientifically assess the water requirements for
ecosystems security. Today, approximately 40 per cent (748 bcm) of available water
resources is considered to be unutilizable due to a variety of factors. Probably, this is a
blessing since that water must be used for the requirements of the ecosystems (Status of
Water Quality in India-2011, CPCB ( Series: MINARS/35/2013-14).
1.2 Water Pollution
The key challenges to better management of the water quality in India are temporal and
spatial variation of rainfall, uneven geographic distribution of surface water resources,
persistent droughts, overuse of ground water and contamination, drainage & salinisation and
water quality problems due to treated, partially treated and untreated wastewater from urban
settlements, industrial establishments and runoff from irrigation sector besides poor
management of municipal solid waste and animal dung in rural areas.
It is estimated that about 38,000 million litres per day (mld) of wastewater are generated in
the urban centres having population more than 50,000 in India (housing more than 70% of
urban population). The municipal wastewater treatment capacity developed so far in India is
about 11,000 mld accounting for 29% of wastewater generation in these two classes of urban
centers. In view of population increase, demand of freshwater for all the uses will be
unmanageable. It is estimated that the projected wastewater from urban centres may cross
1,00,000 mld by 2050 and the rural India will also generate not less than 50,000 mld in view
of water supply designs for community supplies in rural areas. However, waste water
management is not addresses to that pace.
Most human activities whether domestic, agricultural or industrial have an impact on water
and the ecosystems. Water borne diseases can be, to a large extent, controlled by managing
human consumption and production patterns. It is therefore important to have an
understanding of human activities, including water management initiatives, and their impacts
on water and the environment (Status of Water Quality in India-2011, CPCB (Series:
MINARS/35/2013-14).
1.2.1 Domestic Water Pollution
Waste management systems have not been able to keep pace with the huge volumes of
organic and non-biodegradable wastes generated daily. As a consequence, garbage in most
parts of India is unscientifically disposed and ultimately leads to increase in the pollutant load
of surface and groundwater courses. On the other hand, the large population of the poor in
3
India does not have much choice but to live off the natural resource base and pollute the
environment in the process. They deforest for food, fuel, fodder and fibre and pollute the
water sources on which they depend, since they cannot afford access to sanitation services.
Domestic water use today, though a small fraction of the total water requirement, is under-
priced for political reasons. This leads to a considerable waste of the precious resource and
inadequate revenues for operation and maintenance. Low revenues result in the loss of the
resource due to system inefficiencies. In most parts of the country, waste water from
domestic sources is hardly treated, due to inadequate sanitation facilities. This waste water,
containing highly organic pollutant load, finds its way into surface and groundwater courses,
very often close to dense pockets of human habitation from where further water is drawn for
use. Considerable investments will be required to install treatment systems in at least the 500
major cities and towns of the country. Estimates indicate that it is viable to set up
decentralized treatment systems for approximately 100 to 200 households where it is possible
to convince users to pay for efficient services. Incentives like soft loans may be provided to
these initiatives (Status of Water Quality in India-2011, CPCB ( Series: MINARS/35/2013-
14).
1.2.2 Industrial Water Pollution
The Industrial sector, contributing to about 20 per cent of the national income, accounts for
about 8 per cent of the current water use. With rapid industrialization and urbanization, the
water requirement for energy and industrial use is estimated to rise to about 18 per cent of the
total requirements in 2025. Poor environmental management systems, especially in industries
such as thermal power stations, chemicals, metals and minerals, leather processing and sugar
mills, have led to discharge of highly toxic and organic wastewater. This has resulted in
pollution of the surface and groundwater sources from which water is also drawn for
irrigation and domestic use. The enforcement of regulations regarding discharge of industrial
wastewater and limits to extraction of groundwater needs to be considerably strengthened,
while more incentives are required for promoting waste water reuse and recycling(Status of
Water Quality in India-2011, CPCB ( Series: MINARS/35/2013-14).
1.2.3 Agricultural Water Pollution
Two-thirds of India's farm production comes from one-third of its land which is irrigated. The
rest is from rainfed areas that employ large populations. In order to meet the increasing
demand for food and farm employment, India has to increase the area under irrigation, and
enhance productivity in both irrigated and rainfed areas. Cropping patterns and farming
practices also do not encourage the judicious use of water. Conservative estimates indicate
that the same quantity of irrigation water used today can irrigate double the current area with
optimized irrigation and farming practices. With limited revenues and budgetary support, the
state engineering departments are unable to operate and maintain the irrigation systems
efficiently, leading to increasing deterioration of the structures and systems over time.
Consequently, there are further water losses due to breaches and seepage, resulting in water
logging and salinity. Water quality is further affected due to the overuse of chemical
fertilizers and pesticides (Status of Water Quality in India-2011, CPCB ( Series:
MINARS/35/2013-14).
1.3 Interstate Water Disputes
Water security is emerging as an increasingly important and vital issue for India. Many
Indian cities are beginning to experience moderate to severe water shortages, brought on by
the simultaneous effects of agricultural growth, industrialization and urbanization. Another
4
concern in the region is the growing competition over shared water resources. Conflict over
freshwater resources can strain relationships between various states sharing these resources.
1.3.1 The main causes due to which water disputes arise between states are:
River doesn’t follow political limits.
Uneven distribution of water resources.
Increasing rainfall variability and frequent draughts.
Increasing demand of river water.
Regionalization of the national policy.
Industrial activity which leads to deterioration of water quality
Untreated domestic wastewater
Table 1: Major Interstate Water Disputes in India
River(s) States Issue
Satluj, Beas Punjab and Rajasthan Harike Barrage, Canals
originating from Punjab and
entering into Rajasthan
Markanda Himachal Pradesh and Haryana Wastewater discharge from Kala
Amb industrial Area (H.P.). and
entering into Haryana
Yamuna Haryana, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh Ammonia issue raised frequently
for supply of drinking water in
Delhi and in Agra(U.P.)
Sahibi Rajasthan and Haryana Wastewater discharge from
Bhiwadi (Rajasthan) entering into
territory of Dharuhera (Haryana).
Dhela, Bahela,
Kosi and
Ramganga
Uttrakhand and Uttar Pradesh Magh Mela and Kumbh Mela
issue- Wastewater discharge from
Uttrakhand into Uttar Pradesh.
Table 2: Disputed Interstate Rivers and States Sharing the River Boundaries
S.
No.
Disputed River States
1. Vardha M.P., Maharashtra
2. Mahi M.P., Rajasthan, Gujarat
3. Krishna Maharashtra, A.P., Karnataka, Tamil Nadu
4. Bhima Maharashtra, Karnataka
5. Sabarmati Gujarat, Rajasthan,
6. Manjara Maharashtra, Karnataka
7. Tapi Maharashtra, Gujarat, M.P.
8. Narmada Gujarat, M.P.
9. Wainganga M.P., Maharashtra
10. Damanganga Gujarat, UT of Daman
11. Indrawati Orissa/ Chattisgarh
12. Mahanadi Orissa, Chattisgarh
13. Damodar Jharkhand, W.B.
14. Subarnrekha Jharkhand, Orissa, W.B.
15. Cauvery Karnataka, Tamil Nadu
5
S.
No.
Disputed River States
16. Thenpennai Karnataka, Tamil Nadu
17. Tungabhadra Maharashtra, Karnataka
18. Churni W.B./Bangladesh
19. Godavari Maharashtra, Karnataka
20. Pennar A.P., Karnataka
21. Ganga U.P., Bihar, Uttarakhand
22. Betwa M.P., U.P.
23. Sone M.P., U.P.
24. Ramganga Uttarakhand, U.P.
25. Satluj HP, Punjab
26. Beas HP, Punjab
27. Markanda HP, Haryana
28. Ghaggar HP, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan
29. Yamuna U.P., Haryana, Uttarakhand, HP, Delhi
30. Chambal Rajasthan, M.P., U.P.
31. Dhela U.P., Uttarakhand
32. Kitcha U.P., Uttarakhand
33. Kosi U.P., Uttarakhand
34. Bahela U.P., Uttarakhand
35. Pilakhar U.P., Uttarakhand
36. Sarsa HP, Punjab
37. Swan HP, Punjab
38. Ravi J&K, Punjab
39. Dhansari Nagaland, Assam
40. Manjira Karnataka/A.P.
6
CHAPTER 2: INTERSTAE RIVER BOUNDARY MONITORING NETWORK
One of the function of the Central Pollution Control Board(CPCB), under the Section 16 2(b)
of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 is to “coordinate the activities of
the State Boards and resolve disputes among them.
CPCB is monitoring water quality of rivers at the interstate borders since 2005. At present, the
monitoring is carried out at 86 locations. Present report covers only 83 locations (as given in
table 3) spread over 40 rivers. Monitoring frequency is preferably on quarterly basis though
few river locations are monitored once in a year which are either small/seasonal or not
carrying any interstate dispute.
Table 3: List of Water Quality Monitoring Locations at Interstate Boundaries
Sl.
No.
River Location Interstate
Boundaries
1 Vardha Bangaon Village near Pandhurana
Village (M. P.) MP/Maharashtra
2 Vardha Belur Dharmadabad (Maharashtra) Maharashtra/M.P.
3 Mahi
Village Bajna, Ratlam (M. P.) M.P./Rajasthan
4 Mahi
Kadna Dam, (Gujarat) Gujarat /Rajasthan
5 Mahi Gammon Bridge, (Rajasthan) Rajasthan/MP
6 Krishna
Kurundwad, Kolhapur (Maharashtra) Maharashtra/A.P.
7 Bhima Takli, Solapur (Maharashtra) Maha./Karnataka
8 Sabarmati
Khedbrahma (Gujarat) Gujarat/Rajasthan
9 Manjara Aurad Shahajani (Maharashtra Maharashtra/
Karnataka
10 Tapi Prakasha (Maharshtra) Maharashtra/Gujarat
11 Tapi Ajnad (Marashtra ) Maharashtra/M.P.
12 Tapi NIzhar (Gujarat) Maharashtra/Gujarat
13 Narmada Navagam (Gujarat)
Gujarat/M.P.
14 Wainganga Bapera, Bhandara (Maharashtra)
M.P./ Maharashtra
15 Damanganga Jarry Causeway D/S of CETP
discharge (Gujarat)
Gujarat/UT of
Daman
16 Damanganga U/S of CETP discharge GIDC Weir
(UT of Daman)
UT of Daman/
Gujarat
17 Indrawati
Nowrangpur (Orissa) Orissa/Chhattisgarh
18 Mahanadi Hirakund (Orissa)
Orissa/Chattisgarh
19 Churni Bijoypur (West Bengal)
Bangladesh/W. B.
20 Damodar Sindri (Jharkhand)
Jharkhand/W.B.
21 Damodar Dishergarh (West Bengal)
WB/Jharkhand
22 Subarnrekha Behragora (Jharkhand)
Jharkhand/Orissa
7
Sl.
No.
River Location Interstate
Boundaries
23 Subarnrekha Gopiballavpur (West Bengal) WB/Orissa
24 Subarnrekha
Lakhannath (Orissa) Orissa/W.B.
25 Cauvery Satyagala Bridge, Narsipur
(Karnataka)
Karnataka
/Tamilnadu
26 Thenpennai Mugalur Bridge, Bangalore
(Karnataka)
Karnataka/
Tamilnadu
27
Krishna
Deodurg (Karnataka) Karnataka/
Tamilnadu
28 Tungabhadra
Hochchelli (Karnataka) Maharashtra/
Karnataka
29 Bhima Jewargi, Gangapur, (Karnataka) Maharashtra/Karnata
ka
30 Pennar Mothikepli, (Karnataka) Karnataka
31 Manjira Janwada, (Karnataka) Karnataka/
Maharashtra
32 Godavari Basra Kavalguda,(Maharashtra)
Karnataka/
Maharashtra
33 Uttra-
Pinkhani
(North
Pennar)
Hindupur (Andhra Pradesh)
A.P./Karnataka
34 Ganga Tarighat, Gazipur (U. P.)
U.P./Bihar
35 Betwa Kanjira Bridge , Sagar (M.P.)
M.P./U.P.
36 Betwa D/S Dukwan Dam Babina, Birdha
Road, Distt. Lalitpur (U.P.)
UP/MP
37 Sone Chopan (U.P.) M.P./U.P
38 Sone U/S of Deora before Reservoir,
Rihand (U.P.)
M.P./U.P
39 Ramganga D/S Sherkot, Kalagarh (U. P.)
Uttrakhand/U.P.
40 Ramganga D/S Kalagarh, Dam (Uttrankhand)
Uttrakhand/U.P.
41 Ganga Dariganj, Distt. Sonepur, (Bihar) U.P/Bihar
42 Satluj Nangal (H.P.) H.P/Punjab
43 Beas Talwara U/s (Pong Dam), Kangra
(H.P.)
H.P/Punjab
44 Beas D/S (Changarwa Village), (Punjab) Punjab/H.P.
45 Markanda Kala Amb (H.P.)
H.P/Haryana
46 Markanda
Narayangarh (Haryana) Haryana/H.P.
47 Ghaggar
u/s Parwanoo (H.P.) H.P/Haryana
48 Ghaggar Parwanoo D/S , Amravati, (Haryana) Haryana/H.P.
49 Ghaggar Mubarakpur (Punjab)
Punjab/Haryana
50 Ghaggar Tiwana village (Punjab) Punjab/ Haryana
51 Ghaggar Sirsa Dabwali Road (Haryana) Punjab/Haryana
52 Ghaggar Chandrapur Siphon (Haryana) Punjab/Haryana
8
Sl.
No.
River Location Interstate
Boundaries
54 Ghaggar Ottu Weir (Haryana) Haryana/Rajasthan
55 Ghaggar Sirsa Hanumangarh Road (Rajasthan) Rajasthan/Haryana
56 Ganga Sultanpur (Uttrakhand)
Uttrakhand/U.P.
57 Ganga
Bijnour (U.P.) UP/ Uttrakhand
58 Yamuna Shergarh, Juhika (U. P.)
UP/Haryana
59 Yamuna Mohena Palwal Road (Haryana) Haryana/U.P.
60 Yamuna Pontasahib (H. P.)
HP/ Uttrakhand
61 Yamuna Buriya U/S Jagadhari, Mandoli,
(Haryana) Haryana/HP
62 Yamuna Sonipat Baghpat Road (Haryana)
Haryana/U.P.
63 Yamuna Palla, Wazirabad (Delhi)
Delhi/Haryana
64 Yamuna Asgarpur village, (U.P. )
U.P./Delhi
65 Yamuna Hasanpur, Mohali (Haryana)
UP/Haryana
66 Chambal Udi (U.P.)
U.P./M.P.
67 Chambal Fish farm , Gandhisagar Dam, (M.P)
Rajasthan/MP
68 Dhela Adampur Village, Bhojpur UP/Uttrakhand
69 Kitchha Pull Bhatta, Bareili Road, (Uttrakhand)
UP/Uttrakhand
70 Kosi Dadiyal Bridge, (Uttrakhand)
UP/Uttrakhand
71 Bahela Badli Village, Tehseel - Tanda (U.P.)
UP/Uttrakhand
72 Pilakhar Rampur, Bhot (Uttar Pradesh)
UP/Uttrakhand
73 Sarsa Badhi D/S, (Ghanoli Village B/C to R.
Satluj, (Punjab ) H.P./Punjab
74 Sarsa U/s Saini Mazra , (Punjab)
H.P./Punjab
75 Swan Dhangla Village, Santoshgarh
(Punjab)
H.P./Punjab
76 Ravi Madhopur U/S , (Punjab)
Punjab/J&K
77 Ravi Lakhanpur, D/s Madhopur (Jammu)
Punjab/J&K
78 Dhansari U/S Ganesh nagar , (Nagaland)
Nagaland/ Assam
79 Dhansari U/S, Nagarjan Bridge, Dimarpur
Town, (Nagaland)
Nagaland/ Assam
80 Dhansari D/S Dimarpur Town , Khatkati Gate,
(Nagaland)
Nagaland/ Assam
81 Dhansari Bokajan, (Assam)
Nagaland /Assam
82 Dhansari Nimligarh, (Assam) Nagaland /Assam
83 Yamuna Dak Pather (Uttranchal) Uttranchal/H.P.
9
Table 4: State Wise Distribution of Monitoring Stations
Sl. No. States/UT No. of Stations
1. Delhi 2
2. Andhra Pradesh 2
3. UT of Daman 2
4. Chattisgarh 2
5. Bihar 2
6. J & K 2
7. Jharkhand 3
8. Tamil Nadu 3
9. West Bengal 5
10. Nagaland 3
11. Assam 2
12. Rajasthan 6
13. Orissa 6
14. Gujarat 7
15. Uttarakhand 9
16. Maharashtra 11
17. Karnataka 11
18. Punjab 11
19. M.P 13
20. Himachal Pradesh 14
21. Haryana 16
22. U.P. 21
10
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
3.0 Methodology
The methodology adopted for collection of information and preparation of this report is as
follows:
3.1 Source of information
Monitoring is conducted by CPCB on quarterly basis in a year, however few designated
locations are monitored once in a year which are either small/seasonal or not carrying any
interstate dispute. After analysis of samples, laboratories of Head Office and Zonal Offices
produce result of water quality parameters.
3.2 Dry Inventory
To carry out the present study, first desk inventory was performed based on background
information available inhouse. During desk inventory, sites were finalized for the survey &
monitoring of the interstate rivers. The concerned Zonal Offices were also informed about the
programme to depute those officers who have sufficient knowledge of rivers and interstate
boundary locations.
3.3 Wet Inventory
The team visited the locations at which the rivers share the interstate boundaries.
The identified sampling points from the possible sources were selected out to carry the water
quality monitoring.
3.4 Analysis
The data collected out through dry and wet inventories was analyzed and processed further.
3.5 Data Interpretation and Processing
The data collected from laboratories of Head offices and Zonal Office of Central Pollution
Control Board was structured through MS-Excel and stored. Data was compiled and
processed to remove inconsistencies.
11
CHAPTER 4: WATER QUALITY OF RIVERS
4.0 Water Quality
The water quality monitoring results based on the observations made during 2005 to 2013
indicate that the organic and bacterial contamination are continued to be critical in water
bodies. This is mainly due to discharge of domestic wastewater mostly in untreated form
from the urban centres of the country. The municipal corporations at large are not able to
treat increasing load of municipal sewage flowing into water bodies without treatment.
Furthermore, the receiving water bodies also do not have adequate water for dilution.
Therefore, the oxygen demand and bacterial pollution is increasing day by day.
The water quality monitoring results obtained were analyzed with respect to indicator of
oxygen consuming substances (Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand), Dissolved Oxygen, indicator
of pathogenic bacteria (Total coliform and Fecal coliform), Total Dissolved Solids and
Chemical Oxygen Demand.
The water quality of the rivers covered under Interstate River Boundary Monitoring (IRBM)
Network is discussed below based on the data analyzed from Table 5.
The water quality of river is assessed with respect to primary water quality data criteria for
bathing . the primary water quality criteria is placed in Table 6.
4.1 Water Quality of River Satluj:
Water quality monitoring of the river Satluj is carried out at the interstate boundaries of H.P.
and Punjab(Detail of location is provided in Table 3) . BOD and DO concentrations are
within the prescribed range i.e.1.11mg/l and 8.11 mg/l respectively. The Total Coliform
range is exceeding the prescribed limit.
4.2 Water Quality of River Beas:
Water quality monitoring of the river Beas is carried out at 02 locations at the interstate
boundaries of H.P. and Punjab at Talwara U/s (Pong Dam), Kangra (H.P.) and Changwara
Village, Punjab. The analysis results show that the BOD concentration is exceeding to the
prescribed range at both the locations i.e., however DO concentration is meeting to the
prescribed standard at both the locations. Total Coliform range is also exceeding the
prescribed limit.
4.3 Water Quality of River Markanda:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 02 different locations at the interstate
boundaries of H.P. and Haryana. The analytical results show that BOD and DO
concentrations at Naraingarh (Haryana) are not meeting the prescribed limit. However, at
Kala Amb (H.P.), the water quality is meeting to prescribed standards in respect of DO and
BOD. Total Coliform is not meeting the prescribed limit at both the locations.
4.4 Water Quality of River Ghaggar:
Water quality monitoring of the river Ghaggar is carried out at 09 different locations at the
interstate boundaries of H.P./ Haryana, Punjab/ Haryana and Haryana/ Rajasthan. Analytical
results indicate that water quality in respect of DO and BOD concentrations is not meeting to
12
the prescribed standards except at Parwanoo(H.P.) and Amravati (Haryana). Total Coliform
range is also exceeding the prescribed standard.
4.5 Water Quality of River Ganga:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 04 different locations at the interstate
boundaries of Uttarakhand/ U.P. and U.P./ Bihar. At all these 4 locations, the BOD and DO
concentrations are meeting the prescribed standards. However, the Total Coliform count is
deviating at all locations.
4.6 Water Quality of River Yamuna:
Water quality monitoring of the river Yamuna is carried out at 9 different locations at the
interstate boundaries of U.P./ Haryana, HP/Uttarakhand, Haryana/H.P., Delhi/Haryana and
U.P./Delhi. The water quality results are meeting to prescribed norms with respect to DO and
BOD except at 3 locations i.e. Asgarpur Village (U.P.), Hasanpur (Haryana) and Buriya U/S,
Jagadhari (Haryana). Total Coliform count is exceeding the prescribed standards at all
locations.
4.7 Water Quality of River Chambal:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 02 locations at the interstate boundaries
of U.P/M.P. and Rajasthan/M.P. The BOD and DO concentrations are meeting to the
prescribed standards at both the locations. However, Total Coliform count is exceeding at the
location Udi (U.P.).
4.8 Water Quality of River Dhela:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the location at the interstate boundary
of U.P./Uttarakhand. The BOD, DO and Total Coliform concentration are not meeting the
prescribed standards indicating polluted condition of the river at the monitoring location.
4.9 Water Quality of River Kitchha:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the interstate boundary of
U.P./Uttarakhand. At the monitoring location, BOD and DO concentrations are within the
prescribed standard, However, Total Coliform Count is exceeding to the prescribed standard.
4.10 Water Quality of River Kosi:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the location at the interstate boundary
of U.P./Uttarakhand. The water quality is meeting the prescribed standards with respect to
BOD and DO whereas Total Coliform Count is exceeding the prescribed standards.
4.11 Water Quality of River Bahela:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the location at the interstate boundary
of U.P./Uttarakhand. At the location, BOD, DO and Total Coliform Count is exceeding the
prescribed standards.
4.12 Water Quality of River Pilakhar:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the interstate boundary of
U.P./Uttarakhand. BOD and DO are within the range at the location whereas the Total
Coliform Count is exceeding .
13
4.13 Water Quality of River Sarsa:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 locations at the interstate boundary of
H.P./Punjab. At both the locations, BOD and DO concentrations are meeting the prescribed
range. Total Coliform count is exceeding to the prescribed standards at both the locations.
4.14 Water Quality of River Swan:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the interstate boundary of H.P./Punjab.
The BOD and DO concentrations are within the prescribed standards at the location whereas
Total Coliform count is exceeding to the prescribed standards.
4.15 Water Quality of River Ravi:
Water quality monitoring of the river Ravi is carried out at 2 different locations of the
interstate boundary of J.K./Punjab. The BOD and DO concentration are within the prescribed
standards at the location whereas Total Coliform count is exceeding at said locations.
4.16 Water Quality of River Mahi:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations of interstate
boundary of M.P./Rajasthan and Gujarat/ Rajasthan. The BOD and DO concentrations are
within the prescribed range at both the locations. Total Coliform count is exceeding at Kadna
Dam, (Gujarat).
4.17 Water Quality of River Ramganga:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations of interstate
boundary Uttarakhand/U.P. The BOD and DO concentrations are within the prescribed range
whereas the Total Coliform count is exceeding at both the locations.
4.18 Water Quality of River Betwa:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations of interstate
boundary M.P./U.P. Concentration of BOD and DO is meeting the prescribed standards
whereas Total Coliform count is exceeding at both the locations.
4.19 Water Quality of River Sone:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations of the interstate
boundary M.P./U.P. The BOD and DO level are within the prescribed range whereas Total
Coliform count is exceeding at both the locations.
4.20 Water Quality of River Vardha:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations at the interstate
boundary M.P./Maharashtra. The BOD and DO level are meeting to the prescribed standards.
However, Total Coliform count is exceeding at one location i.e. Belur Dhemadabad
(Maharashtra).
4.21 Water Quality of River Bhima:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations at the interstate
boundary of Maharashtra/Karnataka. The BOD and DO concentrations are meeting the
prescribed range. However, Total Coliform count is exceeding at both the locations.
4.22 Water Quality of River Sabarmati:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the interstate boundary of
Gujarat/Rajasthan. The BOD and DO concentration are meeting to the prescribed standard at
the location. Total Coliform count is exceeding at the location to the prescribed standard.
14
4.23 Water Quality of River Manjira:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations of the interstate
boundary Karnataka/Maharashtra. The BOD and DO concentration are within the prescribed
standard. However, Total Coliform count is exceeding at one location i.e. Janwada
(Karnataka).
4.24 Water Quality of River Tapi:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 3 different locations at the interstate
boundaries of Maharashtra/Gujarat and Maharashrta/M.P. The BOD and DO level are
meeting the prescribed standard. However, Total Coliform count is exceeding the prescribed
standards at all 03 locations.
4.25 Water Quality of River Narmada:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the location at the interstate boundary
of Gujarat/M.P. The BOD and DO level are meeting the prescribed Standards. Whereas the
Total Coliform count is exceeding at said location.
4.26 Water Quality of River Wainganga:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the location of interstate boundary of
Maharashrta/M.P. The BOD and DO level are within the prescribed range indicating the good
water quality at the location. Total Coliform count is exceeding at the aforesaid location.
4.27 Water Quality of River Damanganga:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations at the interstate
boundary of Gujarat/ UT of Daman. The BOD and DO level are exceeding the prescribed
limit at Jarry Causeway D/S of CETP Discharge (Gujarat). Total Coliform count is within
the range at both the locations.
4.28 Water Quality of River Indrawati:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the location at the interstate boundary
of Orissa/Chattisgarh. The BOD and DO level are within the prescribed range indicating the
good water quality at the location. But the Total Coliform count is exceeding at the location.
4.29 Water Quality of River Mahanadi:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the location at the interstate boundary
of Orissa/ Chhattisgarh. The BOD and DO level are within the prescribed range and Total
Coliform count is exceeding at the location.
4.30 Water Quality of River Churni:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the interstate boundary of
Bangladesh/W.B. The BOD and DO level are not meeting to the prescribed standards and
Total Coliform count is exceeding the prescribed standards.
4.31 Water Quality of River Damodar:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations at the interstate
boundary Jharkhand/W.B. BOD and DO concentration are meeting to the prescribed
standards at the locations. However, Total Coliform count is exceeding at all the locations.
4.32 Water Quality of River Subarnrekha:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 3 different locations at the interstate
boundaries of Jharkhand/Orissa and W.B./Orissa. BOD and DO concentration is meeting the
15
prescribed standard. However, the Total Coliform count is exceeding to the prescribed
standards at all the locations.
4.33 Water Quality of River Cauvery:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried at the interstate boundary of Karnataka/Tamil
Nadu. BOD and DO concentrations are meeting the prescribed standards. Total Coliform
count is also meeting to the prescribed standard at the said location.
4.34 Water Quality of River Thenpennai:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the location of the interstate boundary
of Karnataka/Tamil Nadu. BOD, DO and TC concentrations are exceeding to the prescribed
standards.
4.35 Water Quality of River Krishna:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 2 different locations of the interstate
boundaries of Karnataka/Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra/A.P. BOD and DO concentration are
meeting at the prescribed standards. Total Coliform count is exceeding the prescribed
standard at all the locations.
4.36 Water Quality of River Tungabhadra:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the location of the interstate boundary
of Karnataka/ Maharashtra. BOD and DO concentrations are meeting the prescribed
standards and the Total Coliform count is not meeting to the prescribed standard at the
location.
4.37 Water Quality of River Pennar:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the boundary of Karnataka.
Observation of monitoring results reveal that water quality is meeting to the prescribed
standard.
4.38 Water Quality of River Godavari:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the interstate boundary of Karnataka/
Maharashtra. BOD, DO & Total Coliform concentrations are meeting to the prescribed
standards.
4.39 Water Quality of River Uttra Pinkhani:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at the interstate boundary of Karnataka/
A.P. BOD, DO & Total Coliform concentrations are meeting to the prescribed standards.
4.40 Water Quality of River Dhansari:
Water quality monitoring of the river is carried out at 05 different locations at the interstate
boundary of Assam/Nagaland. BOD, DO & Total Coliform concentrations are meeting to the
prescribed standards.
- 16 -
Table 5: Statistical Summary of Water Quality at Identified Locations
S. No
1
River Location N Period of Observ
ation
BOD(mg/l) DO(mg/l)
Min Max Mean S.D. Min Max Mean S.D.
1 Yamuna Paonta Sahib, (H.P.) 28 2005-2013 0 3.6 1.19 0.62 6.1 10.7 7.8 1.40
Sonipat Baghpat Road, (Haryana) 25 2005-2013 1 8.2 2.38 1.55 4.5 11.3 7.29 0.83
Palla, (Delhi) 25 2005-2012 1 4 1.85 1.77 5.5 10.7 7.55 1.58
Asgarpur Village, (U.P.) 17 2005-2013 6 50 18.76 14.43 0 4 2.75 1.82
Buriya U/S Jagadhari (Haryana) 17 2005-2013 1 4 1.48 0.91 1 12 8.52 1.13
Mohena Palwal Road (Haryana) 18 2005-2013 2 37 14.9 9.58 0 12 3 3.24
Shergarh (U. P.) 25 2005-2010 1 10 3.79 2.38 4.1 20.6 9.05 3.29
Dak Pathar, (Uttarakhnad) 22 2005-2013 1 3.8 1.42 0.80 6.7 10.2 8.47 0.97
Hasanpur, Maholi, 7 2009-2013 4 26 7.68 8.35 0 1.35 2.62 2.90
2 Ghaggar Parwanoo,(H.P. ) 14 2006-2013 1 27 1.22 0.80 3.8 7.5 8.49 3.40
Sirsa Dabwali Road, (Haryana) 13 2006-2013 2 31 8.79 8.86 0 2.1 2.75 3.60
Mubarakpur, (Punjab) 15 2006-2013 3 24 7.94 7.16 1.8 7.4 4.94 1.69
Tiwana Village, (Punjab) 15 2006-2013 2 25 9.88 8.40 0.8 19.8 3.31 4.36
Chandrapur Siphon, (Haryana) 15 2006-2013 3 30 9.84 7.84 0 4.5 2.76 1.72
Sirdulgarh, (Punjab) 14 2006-2013 3 22 10.35 6.02 0 10.2 2.52 2.77
Parwanoo D/S , Amravati, (Haryana)
14 2006-2013 1 27 1.03 7.10 3.8 7.5 8.13 1.86
Ottu Weir (Haryana) 12 2005-2012 0 28 6.01 8.03 0 7 3.65 1.87
Sirsa Hanumangarh Road (Rajasthan) 7 2005-2012 1 24 8.24 8.25 1.5 6.3 4.28 2.38
3 Ganga Tarighat, Gazipur, (U.P.) 14 2005-2012 1 6 2.52 1.61 5.2 8.8 7.81 1.11
Sultanpur (Uttrakhand) 22 2005-2013 1 3 1.38 0.62 8 12 8.75 1.18
Bijnor Deoband Road (U. P.) 16 2005-2013 1 9.5 1.59 0.94 7 9 8.10 0.80
Dari Ganj, Sonepur, (Bihar) 10 2008-2012 1.6 4.8 2.55 1.11 5.8 8.7 7.26 1.21
4 Beas Changwara Village, (Punjab) 17 2006-2013 1 5 1.37 1.32 6.1 17.1 9.87 2.72 Talwara U/S (Pong Dam) Distt
18 2005-2013 1 6 1.48 1.26 6 9 7.69 1.05
5 Markanda Naraingarh, (Haryana) 17 2005-2013 1 85 6.44 5.54 1.5 6.7 3.34 1.91
Kala Amb U/S (H. P.) 19 2005-2013 1 4 1.69 2.34 4.4 11.2 8.02 1.93
6 Satluj Nangal (H. P.) 16 2006-2013 1 2 1.11 0.37 6 9.4 8.11 0.87
7 Dhela Kashipur-Muradabad Road, Adampur
Village(U.P.)
13 2008-2013 6 131 53.15 44.04 0 2.3 0.80 1.13
- 17 -
S. No
1
River Location N Period of Observ
ation
BOD(mg/l) DO(mg/l)
Min Max Mean S.D. Min Max Mean S.D.
8 Bahela Badli Village, Tehseel-Tanda (U.P.)
12 2008-2013 2 77 22.64 30.69 0.2 1.5 1.15 2.75
9 Kosi Dadyal Bridge(U.P.) 13 2008-2013 1 4 2.30 1.24 3.5 10.4 6.70 1.52
10 Kitcha Pull Bhatta, Bareli road,
(Uttrakhand)
14 2008-2013 0 8 4.63 3.26 2.2 26 6.30 6.96
11 Sarsa Badhi D/S, (Ghanoli Village) Punjab
(B/C to R. Satluj)
5 2009-2010 1 10 2.75 2 3 7.8 6.70 2.21
U/S at Saini Mazra, Punjab 6 2009-2013 3 4.21 3.68 1.09 10.4 12.8 9.64 2.90
12 Swan Dhangla Village, Santoshgarh 8 2009-2013 1 4 2.35 1.37 2.4 11.2 6.25 2.96
13 Pilakhar Rampur, Bhot (Uttar Pradesh) 7 2009-2013 1 2 2.76 1.06 0 7.8 6.25 1.26
14 Ravi Madhopur U/S , Punjab 7 2009-2013 1 2 1.12 0.40 7.8 9.2 8.61 0.54
Lakhanpur, D/s, Madhopur 4 2010-2012 1 2 1.18 0.5 7.4 9.8 8.92 1.38
15 Vardha Pandhurana Village, (M.P.) 17 2006-2012 1 6 2.24 1.34 5.2 9.1 6.62 1.08
Belur Dharmadabad & Karwar (Mosi) village (Maharashtra)
4 2006- 2007 0.1 2.1 0.61 1 6.6 9.2 7.65 1.17
16 Mahi Bajna,R., Ratlam, (M.P.) 18 2006-2012 1 20 2.44 4.30 4.7 7.11 6.19 1.58
Bajaj Sagar, near Bansawara,
(Rajasthan) 19 2006-2012 1 8 2.60 0.85 4 8.6 6.23 1.75
17 Chambal Fish farm , Gandhisagar Dam, (M.P)
19 2006-2012 1 4.7 2.10 1.66 6.1 9.8 6.65 1.63
Udi (U.P.) 25 2006-2013 1 4 1.81 0.96 6.7 11 8.16 1.26
18 Churni Bijoypur (West Bengal) 17 2005-2013 2 31 7.7 7.23 1 5.8 1.84 1.94
19 Betwa D/S Dukwan Dam at Babina,Birdha
Road,Distt. Lalitpur, (U.P.)
13 2005-2012 0 7.6 1.39 1.48 5.3 10.8 6.98 1.82
Kanjia bridge sagar, (M.P.) 15 2005-2012 0.8 4 1.54 0.90 2.8 10.4 7.24 1.93
20 Thenpennai Mugalur Bridge, (Karnataka) 11 2005-2011 2 19 7.42 7.24 1 6 2.43 1.70
- 18 -
S. No
1
River Location N Period of Observ
ation
BOD(mg/l) DO(mg/l)
Min Max Mean S.D. Min Max Mean S.D.
21 Sone Chopan, (D/S before Reservoir Rihand), (U.P.)
15 2005-2012 1 3 1.52 0.87 5.5 10.2 7.09 1.54
Deora (U/S before Reservoir Rihand), (M.P.)
15 2005-2012 0.5 2 1.08 0.52 5.7 10.5 7.21 1.46
22 Tapi Prakasha, (Maharashtra) 5 2006-2012 0.5 8.3 3.45 3.00 7 9.7 8.24 1.20
Nizhar, (Gujarat) 5 2006-2012 1 5.5 2.21 1.72 7.1 8.1 7.13 1.00
Ajnad (Maharashtra) 6 2006-2012 0.7 12.6 2.92 4.68 7.1 14.5 10.38 3.12
23 Manjara Aurad Shahajani 2 2006-2007 4.3 4.3 4.3 - 7.3 7.3 7.3 -
24 Bhima Takli, Solapur, (Maharashtra)
9 2005-2011 1 5.7 2.30 1.38 6.8 11.2 8.34 1.64
Jewargi, (Ganagapur),(Karnataka)
8 2005-2011 0.5 10 2.13 3.73 6.2 8 7.27 0.61
25 Krishna Khurundward, Kolhapur, (Maharashtra)
10 2005-2011 0.6 4.6 1.42 1.16 5.8 11.5 7.57 2.18
Deodurg (Karnataka) 10 2005-2011 0 1.6 0.97 0.77 5.5 7.9 7.21 3.17
26 Damanganga Jerry Causways, D/S of CETP, (Gujarat)
18 2007-2013 1.41 29 5.92 8.18 0.3 8.47 3.07 2.35
U/S of CETP discharge GIDC Weir
18 2007-2013 0.7 4.2 1.73 1.02 6.1 9.1 7.62 0.80
27 Dhansari Bokajan, (Assam) 16 2005-2010 1.6 4.7 3.10 1.49 4.8 9 7.00 1.89
Ganeshnagar, (Nagaland) 16 2005-2010 0.7 16.5 1.88 4.42 0.3 10 5.35 3.18
Nagarjan Bridge, (Nagaland) 16 2005-2010 0.1 10.2 1.91 2.64 1 10 6.33 2.34
Khatkati Gate, (Nagaland) 16 2005-2010 0.3 2.6 1.61 0.68 5.8 10.5 7.85 1.38
Numaligarh, (Assam) 16 2005-2010 0.6 4.4 1.96 1.11 0.6 15.4 6.63 3.00
28 Damodar Sindri (Jharkhand) 17 2005-2013 0 3 2.10 0.63 4.9 8.9 7.42 0.85
Dishergarh ( West Bengal) 17 2005-2013 0 3 1.94 0.65 6.1 9.3 7.48 0.70
29 Indravati Nowrangpur (Orissa) 13 2005-2013 1.1 3 2.03 0.49 6.1 8 7.20 0.50
30 Cauvery Satyagala Bridge, Narsipur Karnataka
8 2005-2011 0 5 1.18 1.57 6.2 8.6 6.59 1.29
- 19 -
S. No
1
River Location N Period of Observ
ation
BOD(mg/l) DO(mg/l)
Min Max Mean S.D. Min Max Mean S.D.
31 Tungabhadra Hochchelli (Karnataka) 8 2005-2011 0 7.4 2.56 3.53 4 9 7.73 2.36
32 Pennar Mothukapalli (Karnataka) 2 2005 1.1 1.1 1.1 - 5.3 5.3 5.3 -
33 Godavari Basra Kavalguda, (Maharashtra)
5 2005-2012 1 3 1.84 1.00 4 6.8 5.46 1.44
34 Ramganga D/S Sherkot, Kalagarh (U.P.)
12 2005-2012 1 4.9 1.88 1.03 4.4 8.5 7.39 1.18
D/S Kalagarh, Dam (Uttrakhand)
12 2005-2012 1 2.6 1.79 0.55 6.2 9.2 7.79 0.92
35 Mahanadi Hirakud (Orissa) 14 2005-2013 0 3 2.15 0.75 6.4 8.3 7.35 0.43
36 Narmada Navagam (Gujarat) 8 2006-2012 0.8 3.5 1.68 0.90 4.8 9.84 7.33 1.28
37 Wainganga Bapera, Bhandara (Maharashtra)
7 2006-2012 0.3 6.4 0.94 0.42 5.8 8.2 6.82 2.95
38 Sabarmati Khedbrahma (Gujarat) 2 2005-2006 1.1 1.1 1.1 - 6.7 10.5 8.38 2.68
39 Subarnarekha Bheragora (Jharkhand) 17 2005-2013 0 3 2.14 0.86 7 9.7 7.67 0.79 Gopiballavpur (West
Bengal) 17 2005-2013 0 3 2.28 1.00 6.4 8.7 7.55 0.64
Lakhannath (Orissa) 17 2005-2013 0 2.6 2.05 0.2 6.1 9.7 7.69 0.90
40 Uttra-Pinkhani Hindupur(Andhra Pradesh)
5 2005-2010 1 6 1.21 0.48 0.8 5.4 2.89 1.69
- 20 -
CHAPTER 5: STATUS OF WATER QUALITY
5.1 Identified polluted river locations:
Close observation of the results indicate that water quality of interstate rivers is deteriorating in
respect to BOD, DO, TDS & TC and observed not fit for any designated usage. Discharge of
untreated/partially treated wastewater or dumping solid waste into the rivers directly or through
the drains are the main factor for the increase in pollution at these locations. Observed range of
water quality parameters is summarized in Table 7:
Table 7: Observed Range of Water Quality Parameters Sl.
No.
River N Period of
observation
DO
(mg/l)
BOD
(mg/l)
COD
(mg/l)
TDS
(mg/l)
TC
(MPN/
100 ml)
FC
(MPN/
100ml)
1 Vardha Bangaon at
Bangaon Village near
Pandhurana Village (M.
P.)
17 2006-12 5.2-
9.1
1-6 7-29 12-331 18-350 3-180
2 Vardha at Belur
Dharmadabad
(Maharashtra)
4 2006-07 6.6-
9.2
0.1-2.1 6.5-22 4-193 110-900 130-300
3 Mahi at Village Bajna,
Ratlam (M. P.)
18 2006-12 4.7-
7.11
1-20 6-27 25-296 15-440 2-210
4 Mahi Bajaj sagar Dam
at Gammon Bridge,
(Rajasthan)
19 2006-12 4.0-
8.6
1-8 7-32 5-390 23-320 4-140
5 Krishna at Kurundwad,
Kolhapur (Maharashtra)
10 2005-11 5.8-
11.5
0.6-4.6 8.8-36.0 4.0-380 1700-
5000
800-2800
6 Bhima at Takli, Solapur
(Maharashtra)
9 2005-11 6.8-
11.2
1.0-5.7 8.2-36.0 12.3-
844
90-700 40-500
7 Mahi at Kadna Dam,
Gujarat
8 2005-12 4.5-
9.3
0.7-5.9 12-31 9-192 40-90000 40-90000
8 Sabarmati at
Khedbrahma (Gujarat)
2 2005-06 6.7-
10.5
1.1 7.5-14 2-18 2400-
500000
300-500
9 Manjara at Aurad
Shahajani (Maharashtra)
2 2006 7.3 4.3 4.3 26 130 -
10 Tapi at Prakasha
(Maharshtra)
5 2006-12 7-9.7 0.5-8.3 18-69 53-311 2300-
9000
910-5000
11 Tapi at Ajnad
(Marashtra )
6 2006-12 7.1-
14.5
0.7- 2.6 14.0 -35 9.2-413 800-
16000
300-9000
12 Tapi at Nizhar (Gujarat) 5 2006-12 7.1-
8.1
1.0-5.5 11-30.3 9.4-191 1400-
46000
1100-
24000
13 Narmada at Navagam
(Gujarat)
8 2006-12 4.8-
9.84
0.8-3.5 1.8-21 6.0-136 80-1100 70-500
14 Wainganga at Bapera,
Bhandara (Maharashtra)
7 2006-12 5.8-
8.2
0.3-6.4 8.0-34 13-124 170-9000 130-5000
15 Damanganga at at Jarry
Causeway D/S of CETP
discharge (Gujarat)
18 2007-2013 0.3-
8.47
1.41-29 4.2-224 446-
31262
900-
90000
9000-
31262
16 Damanganga U/S of
CETP discharge GIDC
Weir (UT of Daman)
18 2007-2013 6.1-
9.1
0.7-4.2 8.6-32 121-242 9000-
50000
900-
30000
17 Indrawati at
Nowrangpur (Orissa)
13 2005-13 6.1-
8.0
1.1-3.0 2-23 28-52 408-
27000
63-6900
18 Mahanadi at Hirakund
(Orissa)
14 2005-13 6.4-
8.3
0.0-3.0 5.0-15.0 15-30 816-
97000
204-
28280
19 Churni at Bijoypur
(West Bengal)
17 2005-13 1.0-
5.8
2-31 8-121 31-478 1224-
146000
204-
30600
- 21 -
Table 7: Observed Range of Water Quality Parameters Sl.
No.
River N Period of
observation
DO
(mg/l)
BOD
(mg/l)
COD
(mg/l)
TDS
(mg/l)
TC
(MPN/
100 ml)
FC
(MPN/
100ml)
20 Damodar at Sindri
(Jharkhand)
17 2005-13 4.9-
8.9
0-3 8-14 40-243 1734-
146000
600-
146000
21 Damodar at Dishergarh
(West Bengal)
17 2005-13 6.1-
9.3
0-3.0 6-28 34-208 200-
448000
300-
83600
22 SSubSubarnrekha
atataBehragora(Jharkhand)
17 2005-13 7-9.7 0-3.0 0-15 15-168 1900-
197000
200-
109000
23 Subarnrekha at
Gopiballavpur (West
Bengal)
17 2005-13 6.4-
8.7
0-3 0-2 1-157 306-
362400
202-
30400
24 Subarnrekha at
(Lakhnath)
17 2005-13 6.1-
9.7
0-2.6 3-12 27-154 510-
85300
202-
85300
25 Cauvery at Satyagala
Bridge, Narsipur
(Karnataka)
8 2005-11 6.2-
8.6
0-5 3.0-16 222 140 34
26
Thenpennai at Mugalur
Bridge, Bangalore
(Karnataka)
11 2005-11 1.0-
6.0
2.0-19 24.3-
104
36-581 350-
71600
350-
71600
27 Krishna at Deodurg
(Karnataka)
10 2005-11 5.5-
7.9
0-1.6 2-16 386 21-22000 21-22000
28 Tungabhadra at
Hochchelli (Karnataka)
8 2005-11 4.0-
9.0
0-7.4 1.5-19 7.4-548 13-16100 13-1100
29 Bhima at Jewargi,
Gangapur, (Karnataka)
8 2005-11 6.2-
8.0
0.5-10 1.3-28 6-596 2400-
18000
2400-
18000
30 Pennar at Mothikepli,
(Karnataka)
1 2005 5.3 1.1 16 - - -
31 Manjira at Janwada
(Karnataka)
5 2005-12 6.1-
6.6
1.3-3.6 6.0-54 12-272 930-8600 3500
32 Godavari at Basra
Kavalguda,(Maharashtra
5 2005-12 4.0-
6.8
1-3 8.7-31.4 186-
1081
258-5400 800-5400
33 Uttra-Pinkhani at
Hindupur (Andhra
Pradesh)
5 2005-10 0.8-
5.4
0-2 3.8-19 1223-
15552
130 130
34 Ganga at at Tarighat,
Gazipur (U. P.)
14 2005-12 5.2-
8.8
1-6 11-33.6 23-4081 350-
220000
240-
110000
35
Betwa at Kanjira Bridge
, Sagar (M.P.)
15 2005-12 2.8-
10.4
0.8-4.0 5-39 157-176 2-
2100000
2-
2100000
36 Betwa at D/S Dukwan
Dam Babina, Birdha
Road, Distt. Lalitpur
(U.P.)
13 2005-12 5.3-
10.8
0.7-6 2.6-44 111-239 1.7-8000 1.8-49000
37 Sone at Chopan (U.P.) 15 2005-12 5.5-
10.2
1-3 3.9-44 102-421 170-35000 130-
24000
38 Sone at U/S of Deora
before Reservoir, Rihand
(U.P.)
15 2005-12 5.7-
10.5
0.5-2.0 4-44 170-232 130-
110000
79-13000
39 Ramganga at D/S
Sherkot, Kalagarh (U.
P.)
12 2005-12 4.4-
8.5
1.0-4.9 7-36 62.4-
404
200-
220000
50-
110000
- 22 -
Table 7: Observed Range of Water Quality Parameters Sl.
No.
River N Period of
observation
DO
(mg/l)
BOD
(mg/l)
COD
(mg/l)
TDS
(mg/l)
TC
(MPN/
100 ml)
FC
(MPN/
100ml)
40 Ramganga at D/S
Kalagarh, Dam
(Uttrankhand)
12 2005-12 6.2-
9.2
1.0-2.6 3-16 158-436 40-160000 20-28000
41 Ganga at Dariganj, Distt.
Sonepur, (Bihar)
10 2008-12 5.8-
8.7
1.6-4.8 8.0-46 0-213 170-
220000
110-
110000
42 Satluj at Nangal (H.P.) 16 2006-13 6-9.4 1.0-2.0 2.0-95.0 114-324 25000-
16000000
610-
1910000
43 Beas at Talwara U/s
(Pong Dam), Kangra
(H.P.)
18 2005-13 6.0-
9.0
1.0-6.0 1.0-472 94-472 4300-
6600000
400-
1010000
44 River Beas at D/S
(Changarwa Village),
(Punjab)
17 2006-13 6.1-
17.1
1-5 4-180 116-180 6000-
2700000
420-
1630000
45 Markanda at Kala Amb
(H.P.)
19 2005-13 4.4-
11.2
1.0-4.0 2.0-22.0 196-294 11000-
13000000
0.1-
2800000
46 Markanda at Narayangarh
(Haryana)
17 2005-13 1.5-
6.7
1.0-85 7-4700 202-
6594
12000-
11100000
00
1260-
1070000
47 Ghaggar
u/s Parwanoo (H.P.)
14 2006-13 3.8-
18
1-27 2-51 156-504 4300-
21200000
500-
330000
48 Ghaggar at Parwanoo
D/S , Amravati,
(Haryana)
14 2006-13 3.8-
7.5
1-27 2-57 172-504 4300-
10900000
360-
1010000
49 Ghaggar at Mubarakpur
(Punjab)
15 2006-13 1.8-
7.4
3-40 17-148 168-514 110000-
21100000
0
2400-
1950000
50 Ghaggar at Tiwana
village (Punjab)
15 2006-13 0.8-
19.8
2-25 18-132 204-
1224
2100-
13700000
3700-
1010000
51 Ghaggar at Sirsa
Dabwali Road (Haryana)
13 2006-13 0-2.1 2-31 20-588 198-
1228
17000-
30800000
0
200-
220000
52 Ghaggar at Chandrapur
Siphon (Haryana)
15 2006-13 0-4.5 3-30 11-299 244-984 400-
31700000
0
200-
750000
53 Ghaggar at Sirdulgarh
(Punjab)
14 2006-13 0-
10.2
3-22 20-301 146-
1024
10000-
2600000
100-
22000
54 Ghaggar at Ottu Weir
(Haryana)
12 2005-12 0-7 0-28 17-252 1-960 85000-
26000000
0
1300-
23000000
55 Ghaggar at Sirsa
Hanumangarh Road
(Rajasthan)
7 2005-12 10.5-
6.3
1-24 10-142 132-
1114
1100-
2100000
28-
111000
56 Ganga at Sultanpur
(Uttarakhand)
19 2005-13 8-12 1-3 2-20 90-242 1300-
35000000
3600-
153000
57 Ganga at Bijnour (U.P.)
16 2005-13 7-9 1-9.5 2-13 18-242 53000-
8900000
900-
9100000
58 Yamuna at Shergarh,
Juhika (U. P.)
25 2005-10 4.1-
20.6
1-10 34-107 70-292 9300-
9000000
1500-
1790000
59 Yamuna at Mohena
Palwal Road (Haryana)
18 2005-13 0-12 2-37 34-107 190-
1162
33000-
11300000
0
9300-
10500000
60 Yamuna at Pontasahib
(H. P.)
28 2005-13 6.1-
10.7
0-3.6 1.0-30 1.0-304 10-
3300000
6-530000
61 Yamuna at Buriya U/S
Jagadhari, Mandoli,
(Haryana)
17 2005-13 1.0-
12.0
1-4 2-22 62-224 4900-
30000000
0
900-
3900000
- 23 -
Table 7: Observed Range of Water Quality Parameters Sl.
No.
River N Period of
observation
DO
(mg/l)
BOD
(mg/l)
COD
(mg/l)
TDS
(mg/l)
TC
(MPN/
100 ml)
FC
(MPN/
100ml)
62 Yamuna at Sonipat
Baghpat Road (Haryana)
25 2005-13 4.5-
11.3
1-8.2 4-74 161-276 700-
7200000
800-
3900000
63 Yamuna at Palla,
Wazirabad (Delhi)
25 2005-12 5.5-
10.7
1-4 3-27 124-394 7000-
17700000
1900-
17700000
64 River Yamuna at
Asgarpur village, (U.P.)
17 2005-13 0-4 6-50 28-282 540-958 240000-
17800000
0
43000-
2400000
65
River Yamuna at
Hasanpur, Mohali
(Haryana)
7 2009-13 0-
1.35
4-26 23-82 266-820 49000-
6100000
7700-
1100000
66 River Chambal at Udi
(U.P.)
25 2005-13 6.7-
11.0
1-4 2-29 20-700 150-
400000
70-36000
67 Chambal at Fish farm ,
Gandhisagar Dam,
(M.P)
19 2006-12 6.1-
9.8
1.0-26.0 7.0-37.0 2.0-441 19-380 4-360
68 Dhela at Adampur
Village, Bhojpur
13 2008-13 0-2.3 6.0-131 62-1044 194-
1044
93000-
15200000
0
4300-
8800000
69 Kitchha at Pull Bhatta,
BareiliRoad,
(Uttrakhand)
14 2008-13 2.2-
26
0-8 0.8-50 325-450 1700-
16000000
700-
2200000
70 Kosi at Dadiyal Bridge,
(Uttrakhand)
13 2008-13 3.5-
10.4
1-4 12-82 168-380 17000-
2400000
700-
220000
71 Bahela at Badli Village,
Tehseel - Tanda (U.P.)
12 2008-13 0.2-
1.5
2-77 18-1148 264-
2012
18-
78000000
18-
10100000
72 Pilakhar at Rampur,
Bhot (Uttar Pradesh)
7 2009-13 0-7.8 1-2 12-32 278-416 7000-
1400000
40-4500
73 River Sarsa at Badhi
D/S, (Ghanoli Village)
Punjab (B/C to R. Satluj)
5 2009-13 3.0-
7.8
1-10 10-49 106-372 1180-
175000
1180-
192000
74 Sarsa at U/s Saini
Mazra , (Punjab)
6 2009-13 10.4-
12.8
3-4.21 21-85 330-540 168000-
2700000
900-2800
75 River Swan at Dhangla
Village, Santoshgarh
(Punjab)
8 2009-13 2.4-
11.2
1.0-4.0 4.0-22.0 146-312 2300-
4600000
400-
4600000
76 Ravi at Madhopur U/S ,
(Punjab)
7 2009-13 7.8-
9.2
1-2 3-10 96-370 4300-
95000
220-
4600000
77 Ravi at Lakhanpur, D/s
Madhopur(Jammu)
4 2010-12 7.4-
9.8
1-2 5-6 114-130 4300-
220000
900-4100
78 Dhansari at U/S Ganesh
nagar , Nagaland
16 2005-10 0.3-
10.0
0.7-16.5 8-82.32 80-125 17-1600 17
79 Dhansari at U/S,
Nagarjan Bridge,
Dimarpur Town,
Nagalan
16 2005-10 1.0-
10
0.1-10.2 7.8-21 90-130 19-540 4
80 Dhansari at D/S 16 2005-10 5.8- 0.3-2.6 3.4-23.9 0.08- 27-1600 17-22
- 24 -
Table 7: Observed Range of Water Quality Parameters Sl.
No.
River N Period of
observation
DO
(mg/l)
BOD
(mg/l)
COD
(mg/l)
TDS
(mg/l)
TC
(MPN/
100 ml)
FC
(MPN/
100ml)
Dimarpur Town ,
Khatkati Gate, Nagaland
10.5 145
81 Dhansari at Bokajan,
Assam
16 2005-10 4.8-
9.0
1.6-4.7 6.7-35.2 0.14-
150
27-1600 17
82 Dhansari at Nimligarh,
Assam
16 2005-10 0.6-
15.4
0.6-4.4 12-31 51-103 17-220 17-26
83 Yamuna, Dak Pathar,
Uttaranchal
22 2005-2013 6.7-
10.2
1-3.8 2-77 74-162 21-
1030000
200-
39000
Note: N denotes to no. of observations made.
5.2 Polluted River Locations Identified on Close Observation of above Tabulated Data:
1. Damanganga at Jarry Causeway, D/S of CETP Discharge (Gujarat).
2. Churni at Biyojpur (West Bengal).
3. Thenpennai at Mughalpur Bridge, Bangalore (Karnataka).
4. Markanada, Narayangarh (Haryana).
5. Ghaggar at Mubarakpur (Punjab).
6. Ghaggar at Tiwana Village (Punjab).
7. Ghaggar at Sirsa Dabwali Road (Haryana).
8. Ghaggar at Chandrapur Siphon (Haryana).
9. Ghaggar at Sirdulgarh (Punjab).
10. Ghaggar at Ottu Weir (Haryana).
11. Ghaggar at Sirsa Hanumangarh Road (Rajasthan).
12. Yamuna at Mohena Pawal Road (Haryana).
13. Yamuna at Asgarpur Village (U.P.)
14. Yamuna at Hasanpur, Mohali (Haryana).
15. Dhela at Adampur Village, Bhojpur.
16. Bahela at Badli Village, Tehseel- Tanda (U.P.)
- 25 -
CHAPTER 6: ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY AT INTERSTATES
POINTS
6.1 Water quality of rivers monitored at various identified locations covered under IRBM
Network is assessed based on the primary water quality criteria of the 04 parameters - DO,
BOD, TDS and TC as depicted in Table 7. Locations showing any deviation from prescribed
range are considered as polluted and are summarized in section 6.2.
Table 7: Prescribed Standards for BOD, DO, TDS and TC
Parameter Prescribed Criteria
BOD <= 3 mg/l
DO >= 5 mg/l
TDS 500 mg/l
TC 500 MPN/100 ml
Source: Primary Water Quality Criteria for Bathing Water as per the notification at serial no. 93
under Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986.
6.2 Percentage Wise Variation in BOD Values:
Figure 1: Pie Chart indicating BOD distribution
The close scrutiny of the Figure 1 shows that:
• 75% locations having BOD concentration in the range of 3 mg/ml indicate the water
quality is meeting the prescribed norms.
• 7% of the locations have BOD concentration between 4 to 6 mg/l whereas 12% locations
have BOD concentration between 7 to 10 mg/l and exceeding from the prescribed
standards .
• 6% locations having BOD concentration more than 10 mg/l indicate that water quality is
deteriorated .
75%
7% 12%
6%
BOD (mg/l)
Less Than 3 mg/l
Between 4-6 mg/l
Between 7-10mg/lAbove 10 mg/l
- 26 -
6.3 Percentage Wise Variation in DO Values:
Figure 2: Pie Chart indicating DO distribution
The close scrutiny of the Figure 2 shows that:
• 78% of the locations have DO concentration in the range of 5 to 10 mg/l and meeting the
prescribed standard.
• 21% locations have DO concentration below 5mg/l and are not meeting the prescribed
standard.
• 1% of the locations show that DO concentration is above 10 mg/l.
6.4 Percentage Wise Variation in TDS Values:
Figure 3: Pie Chart indicating TDS distribution
The close scrutiny of the Figure 3 shows that:
76% of the locations i.e. 63 locations contain TDS within the prescribed limit of 500 mg/l.
20% of the locations contain TDS more than 500 mg/l but less than 1000 mg/l.
4% of the locations have TDS more than 1000 mg/l.
21%
78%
1%
DO (mg/l)
Below Than 5 mg/l
Between 5-10 mg/l
Above 10 mg/l
76%
20% 4%
TDS (mg/l)
Below Than 500mg/lBetween 500-1000 mg/lAbove 1000 mg/l
- 27 -
6.5 Percentage Wise Variation in TC Values:
Figure 4: Pie Chart indicating TC distribution
The close scrutiny of the Figure 4 shows that:
:
11% of the locations indicate the TC range within the prescribed limit .
4% of the locations have TC range between 500-1000 MPN/100 ml.
85% of the locations have TC above 1000 MPN/100 ml and not meeting to the
prescribed standards.
Table 8: Profile of Water Quality for Last Four Years River Location BOD (mg/l) Remarks DO (mg/l) Remarks
2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 Yamuna Ponta Sahib
(H.P.) 1 1 1.3 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.6 7.8 7.2 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Sonipat
Baghpat Road
(Haryana)
1.5 2.3 1 2 Within
Prescribed
Limits
9.1 7.6 9 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Palla (Delhi) 1 2 2 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
21.4 8.2 6.5 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Asgarpur
Village (U.P.) 10.3 9 5 6 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - - - -
Buriya U/S
Jagadhari
(Haryana)
1 - 1.5 3 Within
Prescribed
Limits
9 - 8.3 8.5 Within
Prescribed
Limits Mohena
Palwal Road
(Haryana)
14.3 - - 5 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
1.2 3.3 - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits Shergarh
(U.P.) 9.85 - - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
4 - - 3 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits Dak Pathar
(Uttarakhand) 2 26 1.4 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.4 7.8 11 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
11% 4%
85%
TC (MPN/100ml)
Less Than 500 MPN/100 ml
Between 500-1000 MPN/100ml
Above 1000 MPN/100ml
- 28 -
Table 8: Profile of Water Quality for Last Four Years River Location BOD (mg/l) Remarks DO (mg/l) Remarks
2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 Hasanpur,
Maholi 16 4 6 5 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
1 1.35 5 7 Within
Prescribed
Limits Ghaggar Parwanoo
(H.P.) 1 1 1 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
18 9.2 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Sirsa Dabwali
Road
(Haryana)
8 11 - 3 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
2.4 - - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits Mubarakpur
(Punjab) 38 40 4 6 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
5 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Tiwana
Village
(Punjab)
25 50 18 5 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
5.2 4.2 - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits Chandrapur
Siphon
(Haryana)
10 3 6 7 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
3.4 - - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits Sirdulgarh
(Punjab) 10 17 8 7 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
4.6 - - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits Parwanoo
D/S,
Amravati
(Haryana)
1 3 1 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
7.8 7.2 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
Sirsa
Hanumangarh
Road
(Rajasthan)
- 4 24 1 Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - - - -
Ottu Weir
(Haryana) 12 9 - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - - - -
Ganga Tarighat,
Gazipur
(U.P.)
1.5 3.1 2.4 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.2 8.3 8.1 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Sultanpur
(Uttarakhand) 1 1 1.3 1 Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.8 - - 10.4 Within
Prescribed
Limits Bijnor
Deoband
Road (U.P.)
8.2 0.6 1.3 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.21 - 8.4 8.2 Within
Prescribed
Limits Dari Ganj,
Sonepur
(Bihar)
1.8 4.1 1.6 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.3 8.4 8.3 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Beas Changwara
Village
(Punjab)
1 2.5 1 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
9 8.8 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Talwara U/S
(Pong Dam)
Dist.
1 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.4 6.2 7.8 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Markanda Naraingarh
(Haryana) 6 4.6 17 7 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
5.6 8 0.6 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Kala Amb
U/S (H.P.) 2.5 1 5 2 Within
Prescribed
Limits
4.7 9.7 - 9.9 Within
Prescribed
Limits
- 29 -
Table 8: Profile of Water Quality for Last Four Years River Location BOD (mg/l) Remarks DO (mg/l) Remarks
2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 Satluj Nangal (H.P.) 1 1 1 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.6 7.8 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Dhela Kashipur-
Muradabad
Road,
Adampur
Village (U.P.)
105 6 105 35 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - - - -
Bahela Badli Village,
Tehseel-
Tanda (U.P.)
76 70 27 26 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
1 1 0.6 - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits Kosi Dadyal
Bridge (U.P.) 1.5 4 8.1 1.5 Within
Prescribed
Limits
7.6 6.1 8.3 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Kitcha Pull Bhatta,
Bareli Road
(Uttarakhand)
9 8 7.3 8 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
2.2 4.7 6.2 5.6 Within
Prescribed
Limits Sarsa Badhi D/S
(Ghanoli
Village)
Punjab (B/C
to R. Satluj)
7.5 3 - 5 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - - - -
U/S at Saini
Mazra,
Punjab
30 5 4 - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - - - -
Swan Dhangla
Village,
Santoshgarh
2.1 3.5 2.5 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - - - -
Pilakhar Rampur, Bhot
(U.P.) 1 4 3.3 3 Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.4 7.8 11 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Ravi Madhopur
U/S, Punjab 1 1.5 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - - - -
Lakhanpur
D/S,
Madhopur
2 1 1 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
Vardha Pandhurana
Village
(M.P.)
3.9 2.3 2.6 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.8 6 5.8 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Mahi Bajna R.,
Ratlam (M.P.) 4.1 2 3.5 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.3 6.4 5.8 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Bajaj Sagar,
near
Bansawara
(Rajasthan)
3.7 2.4 2.5 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.5 6.6 6.6 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
Chambal Fish Farm,
Gandhisagar
Dam (M.P.)
2.9 2 5 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.8 6.4 5.8 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Udi (U.P.) 2 2 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
9.6 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Churni Biyojpur
(W.B.) 15 10.5 21 7.5 Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
0.9 0.9 0.9 - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits Betwa D/S Dukwan 1.3 1.1 4.6 - Within 7.8 8 - - Within
- 30 -
Table 8: Profile of Water Quality for Last Four Years River Location BOD (mg/l) Remarks DO (mg/l) Remarks
2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 Dam at
Babina,
Birdha Road,
Dist. Lalitpur,
(U.P.)
Prescribed
Limits Prescribed
Limits
Kanjira
Bridge Sagar
(M.P.)
1.8 1.7 1 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
9 7.8 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Thenpennai Mugalur
Bridge
(Karnataka)
6.3 19 - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
3.7 5.6 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Sone Chopan, (D/S
before
Reservoir
Rihand)
(U.P.)
2 1.3 2 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.7 7.4 8.6 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
Deora (U/S
before
Reservoir
Rihand)
(M.P.)
1.5 1 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.2 7.9 8.7 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
Tapi Prakasha
(Maharashtra) - 6.3 5.7 - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
- 9.7 9 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Nizhar
(Gujarat) - - 2.4 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - 5.6 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Ajnad
(Maharashtra) - 12.6 3.4 - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
- 13 11 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Bhima Takli, Solapur
(Maharashtra) 2 3.4 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
- 7.1 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Jewargi
(Gangapur)
(Karnataka)
10 6 - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.9 7.9 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Krishna Khurundward,
Kolhapur
(Maharashtra)
1.1 1.3 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
6 8.6 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Deodurg
(Karnataka) - - - - - 5.5 7.8 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Damanganga Jerry
Causeways,
D/S of CETP
(Gujarat)
23 7.3 24 - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
2.3 3.9 3.8 - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
U/S of CETP
discharge
GIDC Weir
1.7 3 2.3 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
8.1 8 8.4 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Dhansari Bokajan
(Assam) 5.5 - - - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.7 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Ganeshnagar
(Nagaland) 1.2 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.9 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Nagarjan
Bridge
1.3 - - - Within
Prescribed
7.1 - - - Within
Prescribed
- 31 -
Table 8: Profile of Water Quality for Last Four Years River Location BOD (mg/l) Remarks DO (mg/l) Remarks
2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 (Nagaland) Limits Limits Khatkati Gate
(Nagaland) 2 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
7.2 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Numaligarh
(Assam) 4.4 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
7.4 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Damodar Sindri
(Jharkhand) - - 2.5 2 Within
Prescribed
Limits
7 7.9 7.1 8.9 Within
Prescribed
Limits Dishergarh
(W.B.) - 2.3 - 2 Within
Prescribed
Limits
7.4 7.7 7.7 8.5 Within
Prescribed
Limits Cauvery Satyagala
Bridge,
Narsipur,
Karnataka
- - - - - 6.5 6.2 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
Indrawati Nowrangpur
(Orissa) 2.6 2 2 2 Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.6 7.4 7.1 7.6 Within
Prescribed
Limits Tungabhadra Hochchelli
(Karnataka) - - - - - 8 8 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Godavari Basra
Kavalguda
(Maharashtra)
9 - 19 - Not Within
Prescribed
Limits
6 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits Ramganga D/S Sherkot,
Kalagarh
(U.P.)
3 2.7 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.9 8.4 8 - Within
Prescribed
Limits D/S Kalagarh
Dam
(Uttarakhand)
2.6 1 - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
6.6 9.2 7 Within
Prescribed
Limits Mahanadi Hirakund
(Orissa) 2 - 2 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
7.7 7.3 7.4 7.7 Within
Prescribed
Limits Narmada Navagam
(Gujarat) - 3.3 3.5 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
- 9.8 7.6 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Wainganga Bapera,
Bhandara
(Maharashtra)
- - 0.92 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
- - 6.4 - Within
Prescribed
Limits Subarnrekha Bheragora
(Jharkhand) 3 - 3 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
7.4 8.5 8 7.8 Within
Prescribed
Limits Gopiballavpur
(W.B.) - - 3 - Within
Prescribed
Limits
7.5 7.7 7.7 7.6 Within
Prescribed
Limits Uttra Pikhani Hindupur
(A.P.) - - - - - 3 - - - Within
Prescribed
Limits
- 32 -
CHAPTER 7: WATER QUALITY TREND
7.1 Water Quality of River Satluj
River Satluj originates from beyond Indian borders in the Southern lopes of the Kailash mountain
near Mansarover lake from Rakas lake, It enters Himachal at Shipki and flows in the South-
Westerly direction through Kinnaur, Shimla, Kullu, Solan, Mandi and Bilaspur districts. Its corse
in Himachal Pradesh is 320 km. Water quality of river Satluj is monitored at Nangal (H.P.),
interstate boundary for H.P. and Punjab.
Water Quality of River Satluj at Nangal (H.P.)
The water Quality of river Satluj is monitored for year 2006-13 having 16 number of
observations.
Summary of Observations:
Water Quality of River Satluj at Nangal (H.P.) during 2006-2013 is depicted in figures (1-6) :
Figure 1 Figure 2
Figure 3 Figure 4
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Max 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
Mean 1.5 1 1.3 1 1 1 1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
BOD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 2 2 4 3 4 18
Max 11 91 9 95 15 18
Mean 6.5 46.5 7.3 26.5 8 18
0
20
40
60
80
100 COD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 136 116 114 112 124 140 130
Max 140 130 124 324 124 204 130
Mean 138 123 117 200 124 172 130
0
100
200
300
400TDS(mg/l)
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 2 3 4 1 2 1 1 16
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 6 7.45 7.4 8.2 8.6 7.8
Max 8.2 7.8 8.7 9.4 8.6 7.8
Mean 7.1 7.6 8.1 8.8 8.6 7.8
0
2
4
6
8
10 DO (mg/l)
- 33 -
Figure 5 Figure 6
Close examination of figures 1 to 6 reveals following observations:
DO concentration is meeting to the minimum limit of 5.0 mg/l during 2006-2011 and ranges
between 6mg/l in 2006 and 9.4 mg/l in 2009 respectively. BOD concentration is within the
prescribed limit of 3.0 mg/l and ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 2.0 mg/l during 2006 and 2008
respectively . COD concentration ranges between 2.0 mg/l and 95.0 mg/l. TDS concentration
ranges between 114 mg/l and 324 mg/l during year 2008 and 2009 respectively. TC count
ranges between 25,000 MPN/100ml and 16,000,000 MPN/100ml during 2010 and 2009
respectively. FC count ranges between 460(MPN/100ml) and 19, 10,000(MPN/100ml) during
2009 and 2007 respectively.
7.2 Water Quality of River Beas:
Beas River flows in the northern part of India. The river rises in the Himalayas in central Himachal
Pradesh, and flows for some 470 km (290 miles) to the Sutlej River in the Indian state of Punjab.
Its total length is 460 kilometres (290 mi) and its drainage basin is 20,303 square kilometres
(7,839 sq m) large. Water quality of river Beas is monitored at two locations : (i) Talwara U/s
(Pong Dam), Kangra (H.P.) and (ii) D/S (Changarwa Village), (Punjab) , interstate boundaries for
H.P. and Punjab
7.2.1 Water Quality of River Beas at Talwara U/s (Pong Dam), Kangra (H.P.)
The water Quality of river Beas at Talwara U/s (Pong Dam), Kangra (H.P.) is monitored for year
2006-13 having 18 number of observations.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 2 3 4 1 2 2 1 18
Water Quality of River Beas at Talwara U/s (Pong Dam), Kangra (H.P.) during 2005-2013 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 7 - 12 ):
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
Min 45000 4E+06 29000 3E+06 25000 93000
Max 9300002E+06 1E+07 2E+07 25000 93000
Mean 4875008E+06 5E+06 7E+06 25000 93000
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 610 56000 2300 460 1000 23000
Max 4900 2E+06 77000 580000 1000 23000
Mean 2755 983000 30066 231365 1000 23000
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 34 -
Figure 7 Figure 8
Figure 10
Figure 9
Figure 11 Figure 12
Close examination of figures 7 to 12 shows that:
DO concentration is well above the minimum limit of 5.0 mg/l during 2005-2012. DO
concentration ranges between 5.4 mg/l and 9.0 mg/l during 2011 and 2008 respectively. BOD
concentration ranges from 1.0 mg/l to 6 mg/l during 2005-2010. COD concentration ranges from
1.0 mg/l to 472 mg/l during 2005-2010. TDS concentration ranges between 94 mg/l and 472 mg/l
in year 2009 only. TC count ranges between 11000MPN/100ml and 9700000 MPN/100ml during
2005 and 2009. FC count ranges between 400 MPN/100ml and 1010000 MPN/100ml during
2010 and 2009.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 6 7.6 6.4 7 7.2 8.4 5.4 6.4
Max 6 9 7.06 9 8.8 8.4 7 9.2
Mean 6 8.3 6.73 7.9 8.1 8.4 6.2 7.8
0
2
4
6
8
10 DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 1 1 1 1 1 1
Max 1 3 2 2 6 1
Mean 1 2 1.5 1.3 2.5 1
01234567
BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Min 11000 79000 3E+05 27000 1E+05 82000
Max 11000 6E+05 7E+06 4E+06 1E+07 82000
Mean 11000 3E+05 3E+06 2E+06 4E+06 82000
02000000400000060000008000000
1000000012000000
TC (CFU/100 ml)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 6 4 1 10 94 4
Max 6 14 12 6.3 472 4
Mean 6 9 6.5 1 236 4
0
100
200
300
400
500
COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 117 103 112 112 94 128
Max 117 128 178 124 472 128
Mean 117 116 145 116 236 128
0
100
200
300
400
500TDS (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Min 1300 740 35000 2900 740 400
Max 1300 750 410001E+051E+06 400
Mean 1300 610 38000539664E+05 400
0200000400000600000800000
10000001200000
FC (CFU/100 ml)
- 35 -
7.2.2 Water Quality of River Beas at D/S Changarwa Village, (Punjab)
The water Quality of river Beas at D/S Changarwa Village, (Punjab) is monitored for year 2006-13
having 17 number of observations.
Summary of Observations :
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 2 3 4 1 2 2 1 17
Water Quality of River Beas at D/S (Changarwa Village), (Punjab) during 2005-2013is depicted in
graphs (from figures 13 - 18) below:
Figure 13 Figure 14
Figure 15 Figure 16
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 11.8 7.64 6.1 9 9 8.6
Max 13 8 17.1 12.2 9 9
Mean 12.4 7.82 11.2 10.2 9 8.8
0
5
10
15
20
DO (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Max 5 1 2 3 1 4 1
Mean 3 1 1.3 1.5 1 2.5 1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6BOD(mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 142 156 4 5 9 9 4
Max 162 180 11 16 9 14 8
Mean 152 168 7.7 9.5 9 11.5 6
0
50
100
150
200COD (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 142 156 152 116 164 160 144
Max 162 180 168 162 164 164 144
Mean 152 168 161 133 164 164 144
0
50
100
150
200TDS(mg/l)
- 36 -
Figure 17 Figure 18
Close examination of figure 13 to 18 shows that:
DO concentration is meeting the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l during 2006-2011. DO
concentration ranges between 6.1 mg/l and 17.1mg/l during same year i.e. 2008. BOD
concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 5.0 mg/l during 2006 and 2012. COD concentration
ranges between 4 mg/l and 180 mg/l during 2008/2012 and 2007 respectively. TDS
concentration ranges between 116 mg/l and 180 mg/l during 2008 & 2007 respectively. TC count
ranges between 6000 MPN/100 ml and 19900000 MPN/100 ml during 2010 and 2009
respectively. FC count ranges between 420 MPN/100ml and 1630000 MPN/100ml during 2010/
2011 and 2009 respectively.
7.3.1 River Sarsa at U/s Saini Mazra , (Punjab)
Water quality of river Sarsa is monitored at two locations : (i) U/s Saini Mazra , (Punjab) and (ii)
Badhi D/S, (Ghanoli Village), (B/C to R. Satluj) Punjab, interstate boundaries for H.P. and
Punjab
The water Quality of river Sarsa at U/s Saini Mazra , (Punjab) is monitored for year 2009-13
having 06 numbers of observations.
Summary of Observations :
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 1 1 2 1 6
.
Water Quality of River Sarsa at U/s Saini Mazra , (Punjab) during 2009-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 19-23 ):
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 8E+05 65000 1E+06 2E+06 6000 6000
Max 1E+06 2E+05 3E+06 2E+07 6000 1E+05
Mean 1E+06 1E+05 2E+06 1E+07 6000 58000
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 4100 1700 4700 34000 420 420
Max 4400 30000 1700 2E+06 420 15000
Mean 1700 15850 28000 5E+05 420 7710
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
FC (MPN/100ml)
- 37 -
Figure 19 Figure 20
Figure 21 Figure 22
Figure 23
Close examination of figures 19 to 23 shows that:
BOD concentration is not within the prescribed limit of 3.0 mg/l except in 2012. BOD
concentration ranges between 3 mg/l and 30mg/l during year 2012 and 2010 respectively. COD
concentration ranges between 21 mg/l and 85 mg/l during year 2009 and 2010 respectively. TDS
concentration ranges between 0.3 mg/l and 540 mg/l during year 2011 and 2010 respectively. TC
count ranges between 2000 MPN/100mland 270000 MPN/100ml during 2011 and 2010. FC
concentration ranges between 900 MPN/100ml and 2600 MPN/100ml during 2009 and 2010.
7.3.2 River Sarsa at Badhi D/S, (Ghanoli Village), (B/C to R. Satluj), Punjab
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 5 30 5 3
Max 5 30 5 3
Mean 5 30 5 3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2012
Min 21 85 23
Max 21 85 30
Mean 21 85 26.5
0
20
40
60
80
100COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 330 540 0.3 250
Max 330 540 0.3 250
Mean 330 540 0.3 250
0100200300400500600
TDS (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 168000 270000 2000
Max 168000 270000 2000
Mean 168000 270000 2000
050000
100000150000200000250000300000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2009 2010 2011
Min 900 2600 1500
Max 900 2600 1500
Mean 900 2600 1500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 38 -
The water Quality of river Sarsa at Badhi D/S, (Ghanoli Village), (B/C to R. Satluj) Punjab is
monitored for year 2009-13 having 05 numbers of observations.
Summary of Observations:
Year 2009 2010 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 1 1 5
Water Quality of River Sarsa at Badhi D/S, (Ghanoli Village) Punjab (B/C to R. Satluj) during
2009-2013 is depicted in graphs (from figures 24-26 ):
Figure 24 Figure 25
Figure 26
Close examination of figures 24 to 26 shows that:
BOD concentration is not meeting to the prescribed limit of 3.0 mg/l in year 2009. BOD
concentration ranges between is 1 mg/l in year 2009 whereas maximum BOD concentration is 10
mg/l in year 2010. Minimum COD concentration is 10 mg/l in year 2009 whereas maximum COD
concentration is 49 mg/l in year 2010. Minimum TDS concentration is 106 mg/l in year 2009.
Whereas maximum TDS concentration is 372 mg/l in year 2010.
7.4 River Swan at Dhangla Village, Santoshgarh (Punjab)
The water Quality of river Swan at Dhangla Village, Santoshgarh (Punjab) is monitored for year
2009-13 having 08 numbers of observations.
2009 2010 2012 2013
Min 1 5 3 5
Max 1 10 3 5
Mean 1 7.5 3 5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2012 2013
Min 10 23 30 16
Max 10 49 30 16
Mean 10 36 30 16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2013
Min 106 220 364
Max 106 372 364
Mean 106 296 364
050
100150200250300350400
TDS (mg/l)
- 39 -
Summary of observations:
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 1 2 2 1 8
River Swan at Dhangla Village, Santoshgarh (Punjab) during 2009-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 27 to 31 ):
Figure 27 Figure 28
Figure 29 Figure 30
Figure 31
Close examination of figures 194 to 198 shows that:
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 1 2.1 3 1
Max 4 2.1 4 4
Mean 2.5 2.1 3.5 2.5
0
1
2
3
4
5BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 4 4 10 8
Max 8 4 22 10
Mean 6 4 16 9
0
5
10
15
20
25
COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 150 312 284 146
Max 150 312 317 146
Mean 150 312 300.5 146
050
100150200250300350
TDS (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 700000 70000 2300
Max 4600000 70000 4300
Mean 2650000 70000 3300
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2009 2010 2011
Min 1020 400 900
Max 250000 400 900
Mean 125510 400 900
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 40 -
BOD concentration is meeting the prescribed limit of 3.0 mg/l in year 2010. BOD concentration
ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 4.0 mg/l during year 2012 and 2009 respectively. COD
concentration ranges between 4.0 mg/l and 22 mg/l during year 2009/2010 and 2011. TDS
concentration ranges between 146 mg/l and 317 mg/l during in year 2013 and 2011. TC count
ranges between 2300MPN/100ml and 4600000MPN/100ml during in year 2011 and 2009. FC
count ranges between 400 MPN/100ml and 250000 MPN/100ml during year 2010 and 2009.
7.5 Water Quality of River Markanda:
River Markanda is a tributary of the River Ghaggar. It originates from the southern face of the
lower Himalayas on the western extremity in the Paonta Valley. This rain-fed river has very low
flow in the winters and summers, but during monsoon the water level rises abruptly. Water quality
of river Markanda is monitored at two locations : (i) Kala Amb (H.P.) (ii) Naraingarh at interstate
boundaries for H.P. and Haryana
7.5.1 River Markanda at Kala Amb (H.P.)
The water Quality of river Markanda at Kala Amb (H.P.) is monitored for year 2005-13 having 19
numbers of observations.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 2 3 4 1 1 3 2 19
Water Quality of River Markanda at Kala Amb (H.P.) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 32-27 ):
Figure 32 Figure 33
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
2013
Min 6.2 6.8 6.4 6.79 6.8 4.4 9 9.9
Max 6.2 7.2 8.13 10.8 11.2 5 11 9.9
Mean 6.2 7 7.3 8.3 8.5 4.7 9.7 9.9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12 DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2
Max 1 2 2 1 3 4 1 11 2
Mean 1 2 1.5 1.7 2.7 2.5 1 5 2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12BOD (mg/l)
- 41 -
Figure 34 Figure 35
Figure 36 Figure 37
Close examination of figure 32 to 37 shows that:
Dissolved Oxygen is well above the minimum limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year 2010. DO
concentration ranges 4.4 mg/l and 11.2 mg/l during year 2010 and year 2009. BOD concentration
is within the minimum limit of 3.0 mg/l except in year 2010 and 2012 .BOD concentration ranges
between 1 mg/l to 11 mg/l. COD concentration ranges between 2 mg/l and 329 mg/l during year
2005/2006 and 2012. TDS concentration ranges between 196 mg/l and 294 mg/l during year 2007
and 2006. TC count ranges between 11000 MPN/100 ml and 134000000 MPN/100 ml during
2005 and year 2009 respectively. FC count ranges between 0.1 MPN/100ml and
2800000MPN/100ml during year 2012 and year 2013.
7.5.2 River Markanda at Narayangarh (Haryana)
The water Quality of River Markanda at Narayangarh (Haryana) is monitored for year 2005-13
having 17 numbers of observations.
Summary of Observation made during 2005-13:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 2 3 4 1 1 2 1 17
Water Quality of River Markanda at Narayangarh (Haryana) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 38-43 ) below:
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 2 2 6 6 6 23 5 5 7
Max 2 8 7 8 22 33 6 329 22
Mean 2 5 6.5 6.7 12.3 28 5.5 114 14.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 206 216 196 202 214 208 240 218
Max 206 294 224 234 244 224 270 236
Mean 206 255 210 216 228.7 216 255 227
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350TDS (mg/l)
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
Min 1100 8500 1E+0 3600 2E+01E+09E+0
Max 1100 3E+03E+01E+01E+01E+09E+0
Mean 1100 2E+02E+05E+09E+01E+09E+0
02000000400000060000008000000
10000000120000001400000016000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
2
201
3
Min 2200 1330 4200 3500 3300 4500 0.1 3E+0
Max 2200 4300 15402E+02E+02300 0.1 3E+0
Mean 2200 2815 9800 75808E+01375 0.1 3E+0
0500000
10000001500000200000025000003000000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 42 -
Figure 38 Figure 39
Figure 40 Figure 41
Figure 42 Figure 43
Close examination of figure 38 to 43 shows that:
DO concentration is not meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year 2005,
2006 and 2011. Minimum and maximum concentration of DO observed is 0 mg/l in year 2007 &
2012 and 9 mg/l in year 2011 respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1mg/l to 2340
mg/l.Minimum BOD concentration observed is 1 mg/l in year 2005 whereas maximum
concentration of BOD observed is 2340 mg/l in year 2006. Minimum COD concentration
observed is 7 mg/l in year 2006 whereas maximum concentration of COD observed is 4700 mg/l
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 6 6 0 2 1.5 5.6 7 0
Max 6 6 5 6.7 5.2 4.4 9 1.2
Mean 6 6 2.5 4.4 3.3 5.6 8 0.6
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 1 2 2 6 7 6 4.6 2 7
Max 1 2340 402 784 85 6 4.6 32 7
Mean 1 6 202 318 37 6 4.6 17 7
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 8 7 10 33 58 32 18 8 39
Max 8 4700 1379 3025 514 49 20 772 39
Mean 8 2354 695 1237 222 40.5 19 390 39
0500
100015002000250030003500400045005000
COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 296 308 224 202 266 626 244 424
Max 296 6594 890 1330 1044 470 244 424
Mean 296 3451 557 661 720 244 244 424
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000TDS(mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 1200 8E+0 4E+0 1E+0 8E+0 2E+0 5E+0
Max 1200 2E+0 2E+0 1E+0 1E+0 6E+0 5E+0
Mean 1200 1E+0 1E+0 4E+0 6E+0 3E+0 5E+0
0
200000000
400000000
600000000
800000000
1E+09
1.2E+09
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 1700133012601E+050005E+02E+0
Max 170025002E+01E+02E+06E+02E+0
Mean 1700191585636E+09E+05E+02E+0
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 43 -
in year 2006. Minimum concentration of TDS observed is 202 mg/l in year 2008 whereas
maximum concentration of TDS observed is 6594 mg/l in year 2006. Minimum count of TC
observed is 12000 MPN/100ml in year 2005 whereas maximum count of TC observed is
1110000000 MPN/100ml in year 2008. Minimum count of FC observed is 1260 MPN/100ml in
year 2007 whereas maximum count of FC observed is 2400000 MPN/100ml in year 2009.
7.6 Water Quality of River Ghaggar
The Ghaggar is an intermittent river in India, flowing during the monsoon season. It originates in
the Shivalik Hills of Himachal Pradesh and flows through Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan. The
Ghaggar originates in the Shivalik Range, northwestern Himachal Pradesh , and flows about 200
miles (320 km) southwest through Pinjore in the state of Haryana. It originates in the outer
Himalayas between the Yamuna and the Sutluj and enters Haryana near Pinjore. Passing
through Ambala and Hissar it reaches Bikaner in Rajasthan and runs a course of 290 miles before
finally disintegrating in the deserts of Rajasthan.
It eventually loses itself in the sands of the Thar Desert . Just Southwest of Sirsa, it feeds two
irrigation canals that extend into Rajasthan . Its seasonal flow is dependent on monsoon rainfall.
7.6.1 River Ghaggar at U/S Parwanoo (H.P.)
The water Quality of River Ghaggar at U/S Parwanoo (H.P.) is monitored for year 2005-13
having 14 numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of Himachal Pradesh and Haryana.
Summary of observations:
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 14
Water Quality of River Ghaggar at U/S Parwanoo (H.P.) during 2006-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 44-49):
Figure 44 Figure 45
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 3.8 5.8 8.3 7.8 18 9.2
Max 3.8 7.06 10.2 9.8 18 9.2
Mean 3.8 6.43 9.5 8.93 18 9.2
0
5
10
15
20
DO (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 27 1 1 1 1 1 1
Max 27 3 3 1 1 1 1
Mean 27 2 1.67 1.17 1 1 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
BOD (mg/l)
- 44 -
Figure 46 Figure 47
Figure 48 Figure 49
Close examination of figure 44 to 49 shows that:
DO concentration is meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year 2006
which is 3.8 mg/l. DO concentration ranges between 3.8 & 18 mg/l during 2006 & 2010. BOD
concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 27 mg/l in during same year i.e. 2006. COD ranges
between 2 mg/l and 51 mg/l during year 2009 and year 2006 respectively. TDS ranges between
156 mg/l & 504 mg/l during year 2009 & year 2006 respectively. TC count ranges between 2100
MPN/100ml and 21200000 MPN/100ml during 2013 and 2008. Minimum count of FC observed
is 500 MPN/100ml in year 2010. Maximum count of FC observed is 330000 MPN/100ml in
year 2007.
7.6.2 River Ghaggar at Parwanoo D/S, Amravati, (Haryana)
The water Quality of River Ghaggar at Parwanoo D/S, Amravati, (Haryana) is monitored for year
2005-13 having 14 numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of Haryana and Himachal
Pradesh.
Summary of observations:
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 14
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 51 7 3 2 5
Max 51 8 4 9 5
Mean 51 7.5 3.5 6.43 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60COD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 504 172 202 156 170 226 196
Max 504 344 298 212 170 226 196
Mean 504 258 250 199.5 170 226 196
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
TDS (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 5E+0 1E+0 1E+0 6900 2500 4300 2100
Max 5E+0 2E+0 2E+0 3E+0 2500 4300 2100
Mean 5E+0 2E+0 7E+0 3E+0 2500 4300 2100
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 49002E+0 600 2100 500 900 1100
Max 49003E+021003E+0 500 900 1100
Mean 49003E+088677711 500 900 1100
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 45 -
Water Quality of River Ghaggar at Parwanoo D/S , Amravati, (Haryana)during 2005-2013 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 50-55 ) below:
Figure 50 Figure 51
Figure 52 Figure 53
Figure 54 Figure 55
Close examination of figure 50-55 shows that:
DO concentration is above the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year 2006 which is
3.8 mg/l. DO concentration ranges between 3.8 mg/l and 11.2 mg/l during year 2006 & 2008.
BOD ranges between 1 mg/l and 27 mg/l during year 2006 and 2007 respectively. COD
concentration ranges between 2 mg/l and 51 mg/l during year 2008 & 2006 respectively. TDS
ranges between 72 mg/l and 504 mg/l in year 2007 and 2006 respectively. TC count ranges
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 3.8 5.8 8.3 7.4 7.8 7.2
Max 3.8 7.06 11.2 9.5 7.8 7.2
Mean 3.8 6.43 9.6 8.2 7.8 7.2
02468
1012
DO (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 27 1 1 1 1 3 1
Max 27 3 3 2 1 3 1
Mean 27 2 1.7 1.25 1 3 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30BOD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 504 172 298 244 280 468 272
Max 504 344 360 304 280 468 272
Mean 504 258 329 282 280 468 272
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
TDS (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 51 7 2 5 5 20
Max 51 8 17 8 5 20
Mean 51 7.5 7.33 6.5 5 20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60COD (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 5E+06 1E+07 4E+06 95000 27000 4300 13000
Max 5E+06 2E+07 2E+07 1E+07 27000 4300 13000
Mean 5E+06 2E+07 1E+07 4E+06 27000 4300 13000
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 4900 2E+0 5000 2000 360 1500 7900
Max 4900 3E+0 1700 1E+0 360 1500 7900
Mean 4900 3E+0 1100 4E+0 360 1500 7900
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 46 -
between 4300MPN/100ml and 10900000 MPN/100 ml during year 2011 and 2009 respectively.
FC count ranges between 360 MPN/100ml and 1010000 MPN/100 ml during year 2010 and
2009.
7.6.3 River Ghaggar at Mubarakpur (Punjab)
The water Quality of River Ghaggar at Mubarakpur (Punjab) is monitored for year 2006-13
having 15 numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of Punjab and Haryana.
Summary of Observations:
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 15
Water Quality of River Ghaggar at Mubarakpur (Punjab) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 56-61 ) below:
Figure 56 Figure 57
Figure 58 Figure 59
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 3.4 3.72 4.8 1.8 5
Max 7 5.4 7.4 6.6 5
Mean 5.2 4.56 5.73 4.5 5
0
2
4
6
8
DO (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 3 3 12 3 38 40 4 6
Max 16 4 24 14 38 40 4 6
Mean 9.5 3.5 19 10.25 38 40 4 6
0
10
20
30
40
50BOD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 33 22 40 17 148 85 46 30
Max 56 26 72 40 148 85 46 30
Mean 44.5 24 55.6 31.5 148 85 46 30
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160 COD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 248 168 302 264 334 514 400
Max 366 320 408 366 334 514 400
Mean 307 244 354.66 324 334 514 400
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
TDS (mg/l)
- 47 -
Figure 60 Figure 61
Close examination of figure 56 to 61 shows that:
DO concentration is not meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year 2010.
DO concentration ranges between 1.8 mg/l and 7.4 mg/l during year 2009 and 2008 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 3 mg/l and 40 mg/l during year 2006/ 2007/2009 and 2011.
COD concentration ranges between 17 mg/l and 148 mg/l during year 2009 and 2010. TDS
observed is 168 mg/l in year 2007whereas maximum value of TDS observed is 514 mg/l in year
2011. Minimum count of TC observed is 11000MPN/100ml in year 2011 whereas maximum
count of TC observed is 211000000MPN/100ml in year 2008. Minimum count of FC observed
is 2400 MPN/100mlyear 2009 and maximum count of FC observed is 1950000 MPN/100mlin
year 2008.
7.6.4 River Ghaggar at Tiwana village (Punjab)
The water Quality of River Ghaggar at Mubarakpur (Punjab) is monitored for year 2006-13
having 15 numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of Punjab and Haryana.
Summary of observations:
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 15
Water Quality of River Ghaggar at Tiwana village (Punjab) during 2006-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 62-67 ) below:
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 4E+06 3E+06 8E+05 1E+05 1E+06 1E+05 2E+05
Max 1E+07 2E+07 2E+08 2E+07 1E+06 1E+05 2E+05
Mean 7E+06 7E+06 3E+06 1E+06 1E+06 1E+05 2E+05
0
50000000
100000000
150000000
200000000
250000000TC (MNP/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 1E+051E+051E+05240060542150001E+05
Max 1E+062E+062E+062E+0660542150001E+05
Mean 4E+055E+052E+056536160542150001E+05
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
FC (MNP/100 ml)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 4 4 1.7 0.8 5.2 4.2
Max 19.8 4.8 4.8 4.6 5.2 4.2
Mean 11.9 4.4 3.5 2.5 5.2 4.2
0
5
10
15
20
25DO (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 12 3 3 2 25 50 18 5
Max 21 5 21 23 25 50 18 5
Mean 16.5 4 11.7 15.3 25 50 18 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
BOD (mg/l)
- 48 -
Figure 62 Figure 63
Figure 64 Figure 65
Figure 66 Figure 67
Close examination of figure 62 to 67 shows that:
Minimum concentration ranges between 0.8 mg/l and 19.8 mg/l during year 2009 and 2006
respectively. BOD Concentration ranges between 2 mg/l and 50 mg/l during year 2009 and 2011
respectively. COD ranges between 18 mg/l and 132 mg/l during year 2009 and 2010 respectively.
TDS ranges between 204 mg/l and 1224 mg/l during year 2009 and 2011 respectively. TC
count ranges between 21000 MPN/100ml and 13700000 MPN/100ml during year 2008
respectively. FC ranges between 4300 MPN/100ml and 1010000 MPN/100ml during year 2011
and 2009 respectively.
7.6.5 River Ghaggar at Sirsa Dabwali Road (Haryana)
The water Quality of River Ghaggar at Sirsa Dabwali Road (Haryana) is monitored for year 2006-
13 having 13 numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of Haryana and Punjab.
Summary of observations:
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 13
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 64 20 28 18 132 121 73 28
Max 66 34 59 82 132 121 73 28
Mean 65 27 43.5 53.3 132 121 73 28
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
COD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 410 264 204 456 892 1224 546
Max 842 442 522 588 892 1224 546
Mean 626 353 363 500 892 1224 546
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400TDS(mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 1E+06 8E+05 8E+05 5E+05 7E+05210004E+05
Max 5E+06 9E+05 1E+07 1E+07 7E+05210004E+05
Mean 3E+06 9E+05 5E+06 5E+06 7E+05210004E+05
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
14000000
16000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 97000 89000 56000 37000 40000 4300 79000
Max 430000182000480000 1E+06 40000 4300 79000
Mean 263500135500208333536750 40000 4300 79000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000F C (MPN/100 ml)
- 49 -
Water Quality of River Ghaggar at Sirsa Dabwali Road (Haryana) during 2006-2013 is depicted
in graphs (from figures 68-73 ) below:
Figure 68 Figure 69
Figure 70 Figure 71
Figure 72 Figure 73
Close examination of figure 68 to 73 shows that:
DO concentration is not meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year 2006.
Minimum concentration of DO observed is 0 mg/l in year 2008 and 2009 whereas maximum
concentration of DO observed is 12.2 mg/l in year 2006. Concentration of BOD is not meeting to
the maximum prescribed limit of 3.0 mg/l except in year 2013. Minimum concentration of BOD
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 12.2 4.2 0 0 2.4
Max 12.2 4.7 6 2.1 2.4
Mean 12.2 4.45 3 0.4 2.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
DO(mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 15 2 4 9 8 11 3
Max 15 8 128 23 8 11 3
Mean 15 5 54.3 19 8 11 3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
BOD (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 68 20 143 42 72 127 47
Max 68 100 588 118 72 127 47
Mean 68 60 365 80 72 127 47
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700COD(mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 306 198 256 386 604 1026 418
Max 306 640 1228 768 604 1026 418
Mean 306 419 730.7 577 604 1026 418
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400TDS (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 3E+0 8E+0 1E+0 3E+0 2800 2E+0 1700
Max 3E+0 1E+0 3E+0 1E+0 2800 2E+0 1700
Mean 3E+0 9E+0 1E+0 4E+0 2800 2E+0 1700
050000000
100000000150000000200000000250000000300000000350000000
TC (MNP/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 2E+051E+0511200 2700 200 4000011000
Max 2E+052E+052E+0590000 200 4000011000
Mean 2E+052E+058873310350 200 4000011000
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
FC (MNP/100 ml)
- 50 -
observed is 2 mg/l in year 2007 whereas maximum concentration of BOD observed is 128 mg/l in
year 2008. Minimum concentration of COD observed is 20 mg/l in year 2007. Maximum
concentration of COD observed is 588 mg/l in year 2008. Minimum concentration of TDS
observed is 198 mg/l in year 2007 whereas maximum concentration of TDS observed is 1228 mg/l
in year 2008. Minimum count of TC observed is 17000MPN/100ml in year 2013 whereas
maximum count of TC observed is 308000000MPN/100mlin year 2008. Minimum count of FC
observed is 200MPN/100ml in year 2010 whereas maximum count of FC observed is
220000MPN/100ml in year 2006.
7.6.6 Ghaggar at Chandrapur Siphon (Haryana)
The water Quality of River Ghaggar at Chandrapur Siphon (Haryana) is monitored for year 2006-13
having 15 numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of Haryana and Punjab.
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 15
Water Quality of River Ghaggar at Chandrapur Siphon (Haryana) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 74-79 ):
Figure 74 Figure 75
Figure 76 Figure 77
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 0.2 0 2.5 1.6 3.4
Max 2.6 3.2 4.2 4.5 3.4
Mean 1.4 1.6 3.4 3.2 3.4
0
1
2
3
4
5DO (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 13 4 5 11 10 3 6 7
Max 30 20 95 21 10 3 6 7
Mean 21.5 12 38.3 14.7 10 3 6 7
0
20
40
60
80
100BOD (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 170 22 11 35 81 23 83 48
Max 241 82 299 153 81 23 83 48
Mean 205.5 52 130 85.3 81 23 83 48
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
COD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 898 244 326 445 484 352 368
Max 984 740 868 445 484 352 368
Mean 941 492 628 445 484 352 368
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
TDS (mg/l)
- 51 -
Figure 78 Figure 79
Close examination of figure 74 to 79 shows that:
DO concentration is not meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0mg/l. concentration of DO
ranges between 0 mg/l and 4.5 mg/l during year 2007 and year 2009 respectively. BOD
concentrations is not meeting to the maximum prescribed limit of 3.0 mg/l except in year 2011and
ranges between 3mg/l and 95 mg/l during year 2008 and year 2011 respectively. COD
concentration ranges between 11 mg/l and 299 mg/l in the same year i.e. year 2008. TDS
concentration ranges between 244 mg/l and 984 mg/l during year 2007 and year 2006 respectively.
TC count ranges between 400MPN/100ml and 317000000MPN/100ml during year 2013 and
year 2008 respectively. FC count ranges between is 200 MPN/100ml and 750000 MPN/100ml
during year 2013 and year 2008.
7.6.7 River Ghaggar at Sirdulgarh (Punjab)
The water Quality of River Ghaggar at Sirdulgarh (Punjab) is monitored for year 2006-13 having
14 numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of Haryana and Punjab.
Summary of observations:
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 14
Water Quality of River Ghaggar at Sirdulgarh (Punjab) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 80-85 ):
Figure 80 Figure 81
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 2E+071E+062E+055E+05 9000 15000 400
Max 2E+074E+063E+086E+06 9000 15000 400
Mean 2E+072E+061E+082E+06 9000 15000 400
050000000
100000000150000000200000000250000000300000000350000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 2900 5200 6100 2300 200 7000 200
Max 4400 1E+0 3E+0 8E+0 200 7000 200
Mean 3650 9550 1E+0 3E+0 200 7000 200
0100000200000300000400000500000600000700000800000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 0.1 6 0 1.4 4.6
Max 10.2 6 5.4 3.6 4.6
Mean 5.15 6 3 2.2 4.6
02468
1012
DO (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 8 3 8 8 10 17 8 7
Max 22 64 84 21 10 17 8 7
Mean 15 33.5 36 14.3 10 17 8 7
0
20
40
60
80
100
BOD (mg/l)
- 52 -
Figure 82 Figure 83
Figure 84 Figure 85
Close examination of figure 80 to 85 shows that:
DO concentration are not meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year 2007.
DO concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 10.2 mg/l during year 2008 and 2006 respectively.
BOD concentration is exceeding to the maximum prescribed limit and ranges between 3 mg/l and
84mg/l during year 2008 and year 2007 respectively. COD concentration ranges between 20 mg/l
and 301 mg/l during same year i.e. 2008. TDS concentration ranges between 146mg/l and 1024
mg/l in the same year i.e. 2006. TC count ranges between 10000 MPN/100ml in and 19500000
MPN/100ml during 2010 and 2006 respectively. FC count ranges between 100 MPN/100ml in and
151000 MPN/100ml during 2010 and 2006 respectively.
7.6.8 River Ghaggar at Ottu Weir (Haryana)
The water Quality of River Ghaggar at Ottu Weir (Haryana) is monitored for year 2005-13 having
12 numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of Haryana and Rajasthan.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 Total
Observations 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 12
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 21 30 20 45 71 67 111 43
Max 124 158 301 92 71 67 111 43
Mean 72.5 94 16174.7 71 67 111 43
050
100150200250300350
COD (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 146 222 276 390 586 592 410
Max 1024 880 834 714 586 592 410
Mean 585 551 556 562 586 592 410
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
TDS (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 8E+07E+036001E+010002E+04900
Max 2E+02E+05E+01E+010002E+04900
Mean 1E+02E+02E+04E+010002E+04900
0
10000000
20000000
30000000
40000000
50000000
60000000TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 490007500 2100 2200 100 4000022000
Max 2E+05670001650080000 100 4000022000
Mean 1E+0537250816734400 100 4000022000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 53 -
Water Quality of River Ghaggar at Ottu Weir (Haryana) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 86-91 )below:
Figure 86 Figure 87
Figure 88 Figure 89
Figure 90 Figure 91
Close examination of figure 86 to 91 shows:
DO concentration is not meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year 2005
and 2006. DO Concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 7 mg/l during year 2008 and 2006
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 70 mg/l in the same year i.e. 2008.
BOD concentration ranges between 17 mg/l and 252 mg/l in the same year 2008. TDS ranges
between 1 mg/l and 960 mg/l during year 2008 and 2011 respectively. TC count ranges between
85000 MPN/100ml and 26000000MPN/100ml during year 2007 and 2008 respectively. FC
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Min 6.1 6.6 3.14 0 2.8
Max 6.1 7 5 4 3.7
Mean 6.1 6.8 4.07 2.65 3.3
012345678
DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012
Min 2 2 2 0 11 12 9
Max 2 3 6 70 13 12 9
Mean 2 2.5 4 14 12 12 9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
BOD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2013
Min 57 90 19 17 36 129 54
Max 57 90 50 252 106 129 54
Mean 57 90 34.5 134.5 71 129 54
050
100150200250300
COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011
Min 125 581 168 1 106 960
Max 125 581 644 744 106 960
Mean 125 581 406 130.5 106 960
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200TDS (mg/l)
2007 2008 2009 2011
Min 85000 1980000 450000 430000
Max 1180000 2.6E+07 1700000 430000
Mean 632500 2890000 1075000 430000
05000000
1000000015000000200000002500000030000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2007 2008 2009 2011
Min 7700 1300 4000 230000
Max 27000 111000 230000 230000
Mean 17350 83500 117000 230000
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 54 -
count ranges between 1300MPN/100ml and 23000000MPN/100ml during year 2008 and 2009/
2011 respectively.
7.6.9 River Ghaggar at Sirsa Hanumangarh Road (Rajasthan)
The water Quality of River Ghaggar at at Sirsa Hanumangarh Road (Rajasthan) is monitored for
year 2005-13 having 7 numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of Haryana and
Rajasthan. During monitoring in summer season, the river is found often dry.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2007 2008 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 1 1 1 1 7
Water Quality of River Ghaggar at Sirsa Hanumangarh Road (Rajasthan) during 2005-2013 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 92-97 ):
Figure 92 Figure 93
Figure 94 Figure 95
2005 2007 2008
Min 4.2 1.57 6.3
Max 4.2 6.2 6.3
Mean 4.2 3.885 6.3
01234567
DO (mg/l)
2005 2007 2008 2011 2012 2013
Min 1.26 3 2 9 24 1
Max 1.26 4 2 9 24 1
Mean 1.26 3.5 2 9 24 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30BOD (mg/l)
2005
2007
2008
2011
2012
2013
Min 23 18 30 142 104 10
Max 23 31 30 142 104 10
Mean 23 24.5 30 142 104 10
0
50
100
150
COD (mg/l)
2005 2007 2008 2011 2013
Min 216 172 238 114 132
Max 216 506 238 114 132
Mean 216 339 238 114 132
0
100
200
300
400
500
600TDS (mg/l)
- 55 -
Figure 96 Figure 97
Close examination of figure 92 to 97 shows that:
DO concentration are not meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year
2008. DO concentration ranges between 1.57 mg/l and 6.3 mg/l in the same year i.e. 2008. BOD
concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 24 mg/l during year 2013 and 2012. COD concentration
ranges between 10 mg/l and 142 mg/l during year 2013 and 2011 respectively. TDS ranges
between 114 mg/l and 506 mg/l during year 2011 and 2007 respectively. TC count ranges
between 1100 MPN/100ml and 2100000MPN/100 ml in year 2005 and 2007. FC count ranges
between 28 MPN/100ml and 111000 MPN/100ml during year 2005 and 2007 respectively.
7.7 Water Quality of River Ganga
River Bhagirathi and river Alaknanda originate in Garhwal Himalayas and join at Devprayag to
form River Ganga. River Ganga traverses through Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand
and West Bengal and thereafter enters Bangladesh. The important tributaries of Ganga are the
Yamuna, the Kali, the Ramganga, the Ghaghra, the Gandak, the Kosi, and the Sone.
7.7.1 River Ganga at Sultanpur (Uttrakhand)
The water Quality of River Ganga at Sultanpur (Uttrakhand) is monitored for year 2005-13 having
22 Numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Uttrakhand.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 2 3 4 2 1 3 4 22
Water Quality of River Ganga at Sultanpur (Uttrakhand) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 98-103 ):
2005 2007 2008 2013
Min 1100 1980000 1260000 14000
Max 1100 2100000 1260000 14000
Mean 1100 2040000 1260000 14000
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000TC (MNP/100 ml)
2005 2007 2008 2013
Min 28 67000 38000 4000
Max 28 111000 38000 4000
Mean 28 89000 38000 4000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
FC (MNP/100 ml)
- 56 -
Figure 98 Figure 99
Figure 100 Figure 101
Figure 102 Figure 103
Close examination of figure 98 to 103 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.8 mg/l and 12.0 mg/l during year 2008 and 2006 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 3.0 mg/l during year 2005-13. COD concentration
ranges between 2 mg/l and 20 mg/l during year 2006/2007 and 2008 respectively. TDS ranges
between 90 mg/l and 242 mg/l during year 2011 and 2013. TC count ranges between 1300
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 7.2 8.4 8.4 6.8 8 8.8 10.02
Max 7.2 12 8.43 10.3 9.6 8.8 10.8
Mean 7.2 10.2 8.415 8.4 8.9 8.8 10.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
Max 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 1
Mean 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1.3 1
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 12 2 2 6 3 17 7 5
Max 12 7 6 20 9 17 7 8
Mean 12 4.5 4 11 5.5 17 7 6.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 92 106 100 94 102 118 90 116
Max 92 126 102 112 140 118 90 242
Mean 92 116 101 106 119 118 90 169
0
50
100
150
200
250
300TDS (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 2E+02E+07E+0750018006E+01300
Max 2E+07E+03E+04E+03E+06E+06300
Mean 2E+04E+01E+01E+01E+06E+03215
05000000
10000000150000002000000025000000300000003500000040000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 3300 1110 7000 1190 3600 4000 200
Max 3300 5500 7100 2E+0 5700 4000 4300
Mean 3300 3305 7050 6230 2467 4000 2160
020000400006000080000
100000120000140000160000180000
FC(MPN/100 ml)
- 57 -
MPN/100ml and 35000000 MPN/100ml during year 2013 and 2008 respectively. FC count
ranges between 200MPN/100ml and 153000 MPN/100ml during year 2013 and 2008
respectively.
7.7.2 River Ganga at Bijnour (U.P.)
The water Quality of River Ganga at at Bijnour (U.P.) is monitored for year 2005-13 having 16
numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Uttrakhand.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 3 2 16
Water Quality of River Ganga at Bijnour (U.P.) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs (from
figures 104-109):
Figure 104 Figure 105
Figure 106 Figure 107
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
2013
Min 8 9 8.2 7 6.6 8.21 8.4 8.2
Max 8 9 8.33 9 9.5 8.21 8.4 8.2
Mean 8 9 8.26 7.8 8.2 8.21 8.4 8.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 8 9 8.2 7 6.6 8.21 0.6 1
Max 8 9 8.33 9 9.5 8.21 0.6 2
Mean 8 9 8.26 7.8 8.2 8.21 0.6 1.3
0
2
4
6
8
10
BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 13 2 5 6 3 8 8 7
Max 13 2 13 13 10 8 8 11
Mean 13 2 9 8.3 7 8 8 9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 124 148 102 78 100 136 94 126
Max 124 148 124 152 126 136 94 242
Mean 124 148 113 115 115 136 94 184
050
100150200250300
TDS (mg/l)
- 58 -
Figure 108 Figure 109
Close examination of figure 104 to 109 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.6 mg/l and 9.5 mg/l in year 2009 only. BOD concentration
ranges between 0.6 mg/l and 9.5 mg/l during year 2011 and 2009 respectively. COD
concentration ranges between 2 mg/l and 13 mg/l during year 2006 and 2005,2008
respectively. TDS ranges between 78 mg/l and 242 mg/l during 2008 and 2013 respectively. TC
count ranges between 53000 MPN/100ml and 8900000 MPN/100ml during year 2009 and 2008
respectively. FC count ranges between 900 MPN/100ml and 91000000 MPN/100ml during year
2008 and 2010 respectively.
7.8 River Dhela at Adampur Village, Bhojpur
The water Quality of River Dhela at Adampur Village, Bhojpur is monitored for year 2005-13
having 13 Numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Uttrakhand.
Summary of observations:
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 3 1 2 3 2 13
Water Quality of River Dhela at Adampur Village, Bhojpur during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 110-114 ):
Figure 110 Figure 111
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 1E+0 2E+0 5E+0 3E+0 5300 7E+0 1E+0
Max 1E+0 2E+0 8E+0 9E+0 3E+0 7E+0 1E+0
Mean 1E+0 2E+0 4E+0 4E+0 1E+0 7E+0 1E+0
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000TC (MNP/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 910003100031000 900 11100510079000
Max 9100031000840009E+053E+05510079000
Mean 9100031000575003E+051E+05510079000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
FC(MNP/100 ml)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 20 63 105 6 65 35
Max 41 340 105 6 131 35
Mean 30 167 105 6 105 35
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
BOD (mg/l)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 117 307 236 78 173 62
Max 210 1044 236 78 333 188
Mean 163.5778.3 236 78 264 125
0200400600800
10001200
COD (mg/l)
- 59 -
Figure 112 Figure 113
Figure 114
Close examination of figure 110 to 114 shows that:
BOD concentration ranges between 6.0 mg/l and 340 mg/l during year 2011 and 2009
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 62 mg/l and 1044 mg/l during year 2013 and
2009 respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 194 mg/l and 1616 during year 2013 and
2009 respectively. TC count ranges between 43000 MPN/100ml and 152000000 MPN/100 ml
during year 2010 and 2008 respectively. FC count ranges between 6800 MPN/100ml and
8800000MPN/100ml during year 2011 and 2009 respectively.
7.9 River Bahela at Badli Village, Tehseel - Tanda (U.P.)
The water Quality of River Bahela at Badli Village, Tehseel - Tanda (U.P.) is monitored for year
2005-13 having 12 Numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Uttrakhand.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 0 0 0 2 3 1 2 3 1 12
Water Quality of River Bahela at Badli Village, Tehseel - Tanda (U.P.) during 2005-2013 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 115-120 ):
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 480 832 540 274 428 194
Max 652 1616 540 444 428 426
Mean 566 1167.3 540 359 428 310
0200400600800
10001200140016001800
TDS (mg/l)
2008
2009
2011
2012
2010
2011
2013
Min 3E+071E+0593000430007E+05930001E+06
Max 2E+082E+072E+075E+067E+052E+071E+06
Mean 9E+071E+078E+063E+067E+058E+061E+06
020000000400000006000000080000000
100000000120000000140000000160000000
TC(MNP/100ml)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 1E+06 41000 6800 43000460000
Max 3E+06 9E+06 6800 $5,40 460000
Mean 2E+06 3E+06 6800 3E+06 460000
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
FC (MNP/100 ml)
- 60 -
Figure 115 Figure 116
Figure 117 Figure 118
Figure 119 Figure 120
Close examination of figure 115 to 120 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 0.2 mg/l and 1.0 mg/l in the same year 2012. BOD
concentration ranges between 2 mg/l and 145 mg/l during year 2008 and 2009 respectively. COD
concentration ranges between 18 mg/l and 1148 mg/l during year 2008 and 2009 respectively.
TDS ranges between 264 mg/l and 2012 mg/l during year 2010 and 2009 respectively. TC ranges
between 18 MPN/100ml and 78000000MPN/100ml during year 2013 and 2009 respectively. FC
ranges between 18MPN/100ml and 10100000 MPN/100ml during year 2013 and 2009.
2010 2011 2012
Min 1 1 0.2
Max 1 1 1.5
Mean 1 1 0.6
0
0.5
1
1.5
2DO (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 2 44 76 70 2 26
Max 9 145 76 70 69 26
Mean 5.5 94.5 76 70 27 26
0
50
100
150
200
BOD (mg/l)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 18 138 159 180 101 79
Max 186 1148 159 180 789 79
Mean 102 643 159 180 311.3 79
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400COD (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 402 654 264 334 796 240
Max 422 2012 264 676 796 240
Mean 412 1333 264 505 796 240
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500TDS (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 1E+06 7E+06 250000540000 18
Max 3E+06 8E+07 250000 1E+06 18
Mean 2E+06 4E+07 250000820000 18
0100000002000000030000000400000005000000060000000700000008000000090000000
TC(MNP/100ml)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 60000 1E+06 7200 40000 18
Max 93000 1E+07 7200 240000 18
Mean 76500 7E+06 7200 140000 18
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000FC (MNP/100 ml)
- 61 -
7.10 River Kitchha at Pull Bhatta, Bareili Road, (Uttrakhand)
The water Quality of River Kitchha at Pull Bhatta, Bareili Road, (Uttrakhand) is monitored for
year 2008-13 having 14 Numbers of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and
Uttrakhand.
Summary of observations:
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 3 1 2 4 2 14
Water Quality of River Kitchha at Pull Bhatta, Bareili Road, (Uttrakhand) during 2005-2013 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 121-126 ):
Figure 121 Figure 122
Figure 123 Figure 124
Figure 125 Figure 126
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 22 4.7 2.2 2.5 5.6 5.6
Max 26 7.7 2.2 6.8 6.8 5.6
Mean 24 5.8 2.2 4.7 6.2 5.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 DO (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 0 4 6 8 4 3
Max 4.3 9 12 8 10 13
Mean 2.15 6.5 9 8 7.3 8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14BOD (mg/l)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 0.8 14 50 89 8 15
Max 5 36 55 89 42 55
Mean 2.9 24 52.5 89 24.7 35
0
20
40
60
80
100COD (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 390 325 248 240 316 526
Max 450 410 426 438 316 534
Mean 420 367.5 352 339 316 530
0100
200
300400
500
600
TDS (mg/l)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 7E+0 7100 1000 5E+0 1700
Max 9E+0 2E+0 1000 2E+0 1700
Mean 8E+0 8E+0 1000 2E+0 1700
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
TC (MNP/100 ml)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 7E+06 1300 300 93000 780
Max 9E+06 6000 300 2E+06 780
Mean 8E+06 3650 300 1E+06 780
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
FC (MNP/100ml)
- 62 -
Close examination of figure 121 to 126 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 2.2 mg/l and 26 mg/l during year 2010 and 2008 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 13 mg/l year 2008 and 2013 respectively. COD
concentration ranges between 0.8 mg/l and 89 mg/l during year 2008 and 2011 respectively.
TDS ranges between 240 mg/l and 534 mg/l during 2011 and 2013 respectively. TC count
ranges between 1700 MPN/100ml and 16000000 MPN/100ml during year 2013 and 2011
respectively. FC count ranges between 300 MPN/100ml and 9200000 MPN/100ml during year
2010 and 2008 respectively .
7.11 River Kosi at Dadiyal Bridge, (Uttrakhand)
The water Quality of River Kosi at Dadiyal Bridge, (Uttrakhand) is monitored for year 2008-13
having 13 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Uttrakhand.
Summary of observations :
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 3 1 2 3 2 13
Water Quality of River Kosi at Dadiyal Bridge, (Uttrakhand) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 127-132 ):
Figure 127 Figure 128
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 6.4 3.5 7.6 6.8 6.2
Max 7.4 7.8 7.6 5.4 10.4
Mean 6.9 6 7.6 6.1 8.3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
DO (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 5 2 1 4 8 1
Max 3.5 10 2 4 8.2 2
Mean 3 5 1.5 4 8.1 1.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
BOD (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 16 18 12 32 33 14
Max 29 32 35 32 82 19
Mean 22.5 25.7 36.5 32 57.5 16.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90COD (mg/l)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 332 270 330 290 268 296
Max 380 372 330 296 268 296
Mean 356 315.7 330 293 268 296
050
100150200250300350400
TDS (mg/l)
- 63 -
Figure 129 Figure 130
Figure 131 Figure 132
Close examination of figure 127 to 132 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 3.5 mg/l and 10.4 mg/l during year 2010 and 2012 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 10 mg/l during year 2010/2013 and 2009. COD
concentration ranges between 12 mg/l and 82 mg/l during year 2010 and 2012. TDS concentration
ranges between observed is 268 mg/l in year 2012 whereas maximum concentration of TDS
observed is 380 mg/l in year 2008. Minimum count of TC observed is 17000 MPN/100ml in year
2011. Maximum count of TC observed is 2400000 MPN/100ml in year 200 while minimum
count of FC observed is 700 MPN/100ml in year 2010 whereas maximum count of FC observed
is 220000 MPN/100ml in year 2009.
7.12 River Pilakhar at Rampur , Bhot (Uttar Pradesh)
The water Quality of river Pilakhar at Rampur , Bhot (Uttar Pradesh) is monitored for year 2009-
13 having 07 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Uttrakhand.
Summary of observations:
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 1 1 3 1 7
Water Quality of River Pilakhar at Rampur, Bhot (Uttar Pradesh) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 133-138 ):
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 2E+06 44000 20000 17000 79000
Max 2E+06 2E+06 43000 43000 79000
Mean 2E+06 1E+06 31500 30000 79000
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 119000 2700 700 4500 13000
Max 156000220000 9000 7000 13000
Mean 13750085900 700 5750 13000
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 9.6 8.4 7.8 10.8
Max 9.6 8.4 7.8 11.2
Mean 9.6 8.4 7.8 11
02468
1012
DO (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 2 1 4 3 3
Max 2 1 4 4 3
Mean 2 1 4 3.3 3
0
1
2
3
4
5
BOD (mg/l)
- 64 -
Figure 133 Figure 134
Figure 135 Figure 136
Figure 137 Figure 138
Close examination of figures 133 to 138 shows that:
DO concentration is not meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l. Minimum DO
concentration ranges between 7.8 mg/l and 11.2 mg/l during year 2011 and year 2012
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 4 mg/l during year 2010 and 2011
/2012 respectively. COD concentration ranges 12 mg/l and 32 mg/l during year 2012 and year
2011. TDS concentration ranges between 278 mg/l and 416 mg/l during year 2012 and year
2010 respectively. TC count ranges between 90 MPN/100ml and 1400000 MPN/100 ml during
year 2011 and 2009. FC count ranges between 40MPN/100ml and 4500 MPN/100ml during year
2011 and 2013 respectively.
7.13 Water Quality of River Ravi
The water Quality of river Ravi is monitored at (i) Madhopur U/S, (Punjab) and (ii) at Lakhanpur,
D/s Madhopur (Jammu and Kashmir) at the interstate boundaries of Punjab and Jammu &
Kashmir.
7.13.1 River Ravi at Madhopur U/S, (Punjab)
The water Quality of river Ravi at Madhopur U/S, (Punjab) is monitored for year 2009-13 having
07 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir.
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 13 20 32 12 15
Max 13 20 32 29 15
Mean 13 20 32 20.3 15
05
101520253035
COD (mg/l)
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 342 416 400 278 412
Max 342 416 400 278 412
Mean 342 416 400 278 412
0
100
200
300
400
500TDS (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 1400000 7000 90 14000
Max 1400000 7000 90 14000
Mean 1400000 7000 90 14000
0200000400000600000800000
1000000120000014000001600000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 1200 500 40 4500
Max 1200 500 40 4500
Mean 1200 500 40 4500
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
FC (MNP/100 ml)
- 65 -
Summary of observations:
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 1 2 2 1 7
Water Quality of River Ravi at Madhopur U/S, (Punjab) during 2009-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 139-142 ):
Figure 139 Figure 140
Figure 141 Figure 142
Figure 143
Close examination of figure 139 to 143 shows that:
2009 2010 2011
Min 1 1 1
Max 1 1 2
Mean 1 1 1.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 10 3 5
Max 10 3 6
Mean 10 3 5.5
02468
1012
COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 370 144 150
Max 370 144 104
Mean 370 144 127
050
100150200250300350400
TDS (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 95000 23000 4300
Max 95000 23000 9300
Mean 95000 23000 6800
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
TC (MNP/100 ml)
2009 2010 2011
Min 620 220 900
Max 620 220 4300
Mean 620 220 2600
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000FC (MNP/100 ml )
- 66 -
BOD concentration is well within the maximum prescribed limit of 3.0 mg/l and it was 1 mg/l in
each observation made during 2009-10. Minimum concentration of COD observed is 3 mg/l in
year 2010 whereas maximum concentration of COD observed is 10 mg/l in year 2009. Minimum
concentration of TDS observed is 144mg/l in year 2010 and maximum concentration of TDS
observed is 370 mg/l in year 2009. Minimum count of TC observed is 4300MPN/100ml in year
2011. Maximum count of TC observed is 95000 MPN/100ml in year 2009. Minimum count of FC
observed is 220MPN/100ml in year 2010. Maximum count of FC observed is 4300 MPN/100ml
in year 2011.
7.13.2 River Ravi at Lakhanpur, D/s Madhopur (Jammu and Kashmir )
The water Quality of river Ravi at Lakhanpur, D/s Madhopur (Jammu and Kashmir) is
monitored for year 2010-12 having 04 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of
Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir.
Summary of observations:
Year 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 1 2 1 4
Water Quality of River Ravi at Lakhanpur, D/s Madhopur (Jammu) during 2010-2012 is depicted
in graphs (from figures 144-145 ):
Figure 144 Figure 145
Close examination of figures 144-145 shows that :
BOD concentration is well within the maximum prescribed limit of 3.0 mg/l. Minimum COD
concentration observed was 1 mg/l in the year 2011. Maximum COD concentration observed
was 6 mg/l in the year 2012.
7.14 Water Quality of River Yamuna
7.14.1 River Yamuna at Dak Pathar (Uttarakhnad)
Water Quality of River Yamuna at Dak Pathar (Uttrakhand) is monitored for 2005-13 having 16
Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Uttrakhand and Himachal Pradesh.
Summary of observations:
2010 2011 2012
Min 2 1 1
Max 2 1 1
Mean 2 1 1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5BOD(mg/l)
2010 2011 2012
Min 5 1 6
Max 5 1 6
Mean 5 1 6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 COD(mg/l)
- 67 -
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 4 2 4 4 2 3 22
Water Quality of River Yamuna at Dak Pathar (Uttrakhand) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 146-151):
Figure 146 Figure 147
Figure 148 Figure 149
Figure 150 Figure 151
Close examination of figures 146 to 151 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.7 mg/l and 10.2 mg/l during year 2009 and 2007
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 26mg/l during year 2007 and
2011 respectively. COD concentrations ranges between 2 mg/l and 77 mg/l during year
2007 and 2012 respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 74 mg/l and 162 mg/l
during year 2013 and 2010 respectively. TC count ranges 21 MPN/100 and 1030000
MPN/100 during year 2009 and 2007 respectively. FC count ranges between 200
MPN/100 ml and 39000 MPN/100 ml during the year 2007.
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 9.6 8.4 7.8 10.8
Max 9.6 8.4 7.8 11.2
Mean 9.6 8.4 7.8 11
0
5
10
15
DO (mg/l)
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
2013
Min 1 1 1 2 26 1
Max 1 2 3.8 2 26 2
Mean 1 1.5 2.2 2 26 1.4
0102030
BOD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012
Min 10 2 12 10 7 6
Max 10 13 29 28 7 77
Mean 10 6.3 20.3 19 7 41.5
020406080
100
COD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2009 2010 2013
Min 142 105 133 162 74
Max 142 105 133 162 130
Mean 142 105 133 162 96
0
50
100
150
200TDS (mg/l)
2007 2009 2010 2013
Min 18000 21 9100 21
Max 1030000 53000 45000 14000
Mean 544500 26510.5 24775 4697
0200000400000600000800000
10000001200000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2007 2009 2010 2013
Min 200 500 510 11000
Max 39000 500 7000 11000
Mean 15725 500 2617.5 11000
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000FC (MNP/100 ml)
- 68 -
7.14.2 River Yamuna at Pontasahib (H. P.)
The water Quality of river Ravi Yamuna at Pontasahib (H. P.) is monitored for year 2005-13
having 28 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 28
Water Quality of River Yamuna at Pontasahib (H. P.) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 152-157 ):
Figure 152 Figure 153
Figure 154 Figure 155
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 6.2 6.5 7.8 6.3 7.7 7.1 6.1 6.1
Max 6.2 8.5 10.6 9.5 8.8 10.7 9.9 8
Mean 6.2 7.5 9 8 8.1 8.6 7.8 7.2
02468
1012
DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 1 2 1 1 1 0 0.8 1.2
Max 1 3.64 1 1 2 2 1.2 1.4
Mean 1 2.82 1 1 1.3 1 1 1.3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 5 13 1 3 5 10 2.4 2.4 6
Max 5 22 9 7 24 30 4.6 3.2 6
Mean 5 17.5 4 5.3 12.5 17.7 3.4 3 6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2011 2012 2013
Min 190 220 270 169 151 168
Max 190 250 414 304 185 168
Mean 190 235 365 236.3 171.3 168
0
100
200
300
400
500
TDS (mg/l)
- 69 -
Figure 156 Figure 157
Close examination of figures 152 to 157 shows that:
Dissolved Oxygen concentration ranges between 6.1mg/l and 10.7 mg/l during 2011 and 2010
respectively. BOD concentration ranges 0 mg/l and 3.64 mg/l during year 2010 and 2006
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 30 mg/l during the year 2010 .
TDS concentration ranges between 151 mg/l and 414 mg/l during year 2012 and 2008
respectively. TC count ranges between 10 MPN/100ml and 3300000 MPN/100 ml during year
2011 and 2009 respectively. FC count ranges between 6MPN/100ml and 30000MPN/100ml
during year 2012 and 2009 respectively.
7.14.3 River Yamuna at Buriya U/S Jagadhari, Mandoli, (Haryana)
The water Quality of river Yamuna at Buriya U/S Jagadhari, Mandoli, (Haryana) is monitored
for year 2005-13 having 17 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Haryana and
H.P.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 2 3 4 1 2 2 17
Water Quality of River Yamuna at Buriya U/S Jagadhari, Mandoli, (Haryana) during 2005-2013
is depicted in graphs (from figures 158-163 ):
Figure 158 Figure 159
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 6305606101E+800120 10 16 170
Max 6308609E+4E+3E+4E+ 20 29 170
Mean 6307104E+3E+1E+2E+ 15 22 170
0500000
100000015000002000000250000030000003500000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 5900 3200 240 140 4000 2000 7 6 1100
Max 5900 4200 5100 2300 5E+0 7000 14 16 1100
Mean 5900 3700 1462 1421 2E+0 4000 10.3 11.5 1100
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000 FC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
2013
Min 12 8 7.2 1 7.8 9 8.2 8.5
Max 12 9.4 8.04 2 10.4 9 8.4 8.5
Mean 12 8.7 7.62 1.3 9.3 9 8.3 8.5
02468
101214
DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
2013
Min 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3
Max 1 2 2 2 4 1 2 3
Mean 1 1.5 1.3 1.5 2.5 1 1.5 3
0
1
2
3
4
5BOD (mg/l)
- 70 -
Figure 160 Figure 161
Figure 162 Figure 163
Close examination of figures 158 to 163 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 12.0 mg/l during 2008 and 2005. BOD
concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 4 mg/l in year 2009. COD concentration ranges
between 2 mg/l and 22 mg/l during year 2006 and 2012 respectively. TDS concentration ranges
between 62 mg/l and 224 mg/l during year 2009 and 2006 respectively. TC count ranges between
4900 MPN/100ml and 30000000 MPN/100ml during year 2013 and 2008 respectively. FC count
ranges between 900MPN/100ml and 3900000 MPN/100ml in the year 2008.
7.14.4 Yamuna at Sonipat Baghpat Road (Haryana)
The water Quality of river Yamuna at Sonipat Baghpat Road (Haryana) is monitored for year
2005-13 having 25 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Haryana and H.P.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 1 3 3 4 4 4 3 2 25
Water Quality of River Yamuna at Sonipat Baghpat Road (Haryana) during 2005-2013 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 164-168 ):
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
2013
Min 13 2 4 6 4 4 22 6
Max 13 9 6 10 17 9 22 11
Mean 13 5.5 5 7.7 9.8 6.5 22 8.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 185 166 92 92 62 140 105
Max 185 224 118 156 212 140 105
Mean 185 140 105 124 139.5 140 105
0
50
100
150
200
250TDS (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 6200 2E+0 3E+0 5E+0 9300 7E+0 4900
Max 6200 2E+0 1E+0 3E+0 2E+0 7E+0 4900
Mean 6200 2E+0 7E+0 1E+0 8E+0 7E+0 4900
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
30000000
35000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 108049002300 900 230067004900
Max 1080133043004E+02E+067004900
Mean 1080910033001E+07E+067004900
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000FC(MPN/100 ml)
- 71 -
Figure 164 Figure 165
Figure 166 Figure 167
Figure 168
** TDS was not analyzed at River Yamuna at Sonipat - Baghpat Road (Haryana).
Close examination of figures 164 to 168 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 4.5 mg/l and 11.3 mg/l in 2008 and 2010 respectively. BOD
concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 8.2 mg/l during year 2007. COD concentration is 0
mg/l and 74 mg/l during year 2010 and 2012 respectively. TC count ranges between 3300
MPN/100ml and 7200000 MPN/100ml during year 2013 and 2012 respectively. FC count ranges
between 800 MPN/100ml and 390000 MPN/100ml during year 2007 and 2008 respectively.
7.14.5 River Yamuna at Palla, Wazirabad (Delhi)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 6.1 6.4 6.5 4.5 6.3 6.8 6.2 6.7
Max 6.1 6.4 8.2 9.1 7.6 11.39.2 9
Mean 6.1 6.4 7.257.2 7 9.1 7.6 9
02468
1012
DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 1 3 6.5 2 1 1 2 1 2
Max 1 3 8.2 3 3 2 3 1 2
Mean 1 3 7.3 2.5 2 1.5 2.3 1 2
02468
10
BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 4 11 6 11 20 8 5 0
Max 4 11 13 27 24 74 20 9
Mean 4 11 10 18.3 22 41 12.5 7.8
01020304050607080
COD (mg/)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 8005502202E+2E+700490900330
Max 8005507E+7E+5E+6105E+7E+490
Mean 8005503E+2E+2E+3402E+6E+261
010000002000000300000040000005000000600000070000008000000
TC(MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 3400 920 800 7800 5900 3300 1700 9000 1300
Max 3400 920 1E+054E+053E+054000430004300022000
Mean 3400 920 326701E+052E+053650171753392511650
0100000200000300000400000500000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 72 -
The water Quality of river Yamuna at Palla, Wazirabad (Delhi) is monitored for year 2005-12
having 25 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Haryana and Delhi.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 3 25
Water Quality of River Yamuna at Palla, Wazirabad (Delhi) during 2005-2012 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 169-174 ):
Figure 169 Figure 170
Figure 171 Figure 172
Figure 173 Figure 174
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 7.2 7.8 5.5 6.6 5.5 5.9 7.1 6.1
Max 7.2 7.8 10.7 9.2 9.1 6.1 9.3 7.2
Mean 7.2 7.8 8.35 7.9 7.3 21.4 8.2 6.5
0
5
10
15
20
25DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 1 5 2 1 1 1 1 2
Max 1 5 6 3 4 1 3 2
Mean 1 5 4 1.8 2 1 2 2
01234567
BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 3 14 10 4 3 4 7 11
Max 3 14 27 17 13 32 27 18
Mean 3 14 18.510.5 7.8 14.714.3 14
05
101520253035
COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 280 306 330 132 156 124 250
Max 280 306 394 328 366 250 250
Mean 280 306 362 245 223 212 250
0
100
200
300
400
500TDS (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 42006400160052002500900070001600
Max 420064002E+02E+06E+0410024001700
Mean 420064004E+01E+03E+0252514501666
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 195 190 160 520 250 900 400 230
Max 195 190 2E+ 2E+ 6E+ 410 460 160
Mean 195 190 4E+ 1E+ 3E+ 252 195 876
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 73 -
Close examination of figures 169 to 174 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 5.5 mg/l and 10.7 mg/l during year 2007 and 2009. BOD
concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 6 mg/l in the year 2007. COD concentration ranges
between 3 mg/l and 32 mg/l during year 2005 and 2010. TDS concentration ranges between 124
mg/l and 394 mg/l in year 2010 and 2007 respectively. TC count ranges between 7000 MPN/100
ml and 17700000 MPN/100 ml during year 2011 and 2007 respectively. FC count ranges between
1900MPN/100ml and 17700000 MPN/100ml during year 2006 and 2007.
7.14.6 Yamuna at Asgarpur village, (U.P.)
The water Quality of river Yamuna at Asgarpur village, (U.P.) is monitored for year 2005-13
having 17 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Delhi.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 2 3 4 1 1 1 2 17
Water Quality of River Yamuna, Asgarpur village, U.P. (Delhi/UP Border) during 2005-2013 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 175-179 ):
Figure 175 Figure 176
Figure 177 Figure 178
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 6 45 25 18 20 103 9 5 6
Max 6 50 29 42 35 103 9 5 6
Mean 6 48 27 29 27 103 9 5 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 28 132 88 85 73 282 24 23 25
Max 152 152 97 231 122 282 24 23 25
Mean 132 88 92.5 153 89 282 24 23 25
050
100150200250300
COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 540 958 890 610 552 836 300 416 298
Max 540 958 958 792 938 836 300 416 630
Mean 540 958 924 701 753 836 300 416 464
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200TDS (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 1E+0 9E+0 8E+0 1E+0 3E+0 5E+0 2E+0 4E+0
Max 1E+0 1E+0 3E+0 2E+0 1E+0 5E+0 2E+0 4E+0
Mean 1E+0 9E+0 2E+0 8E+0 7E+0 5E+0 2E+0 4E+0
0
50000000
100000000
150000000
200000000TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 74 -
Figure 179
Close examination of figures 175 to 179 shows that:
BOD concentration ranges between 5 mg/l and 103 mg/l during year 2012 and 2010 respectively
COD concentration ranges between 23 mg/l and 282 mg/l during year 2012 and 2010
respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 298 mg/l and 958 mg/l during year 2013 and
2007 respectively. TC count 240000 MPN/100ml and 178000000 MPN/100 ml during year 2011
and 2008. FC count ranges between 43000 MPN/100ml and 11200000MPN/100ml during year
2011 and year 2008 respectively.
7.14.7 Yamuna at Mohena Palwal Road (Haryana)
The water Quality of river Yamuna at Mohena Palwal Road (Haryana) is monitored for year
2005-13 having 18 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Delhi.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 2 3 4 4 2 18
Water Quality of River Mohena Palwal Road (Haryana) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 180-185 ):
Figure 180 Figure 181
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 3E+0 9E+0 3E+0 2E+0 1E+0 9200 4300 2E+0
Max 3E+0 4E+0 9E+0 1E+0 4E+0 9200 4300 2E+0
Mean 3E+0 2E+0 4E+0 5E+0 1E+0 9200 4300 2E+0
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000FC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.28
Max 6.4 8 12.1 2.5 3.5 2.8 3.28
Mean 2 3.4 4.6 1.1 1.3 1.6 3.3
02468
101214
DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 13 10 8 4 7 2 5
Max 32 21 37 26 24 24 5
Mean 24.3 16.5 22.5 14.5 17.3 14.3 5
05
10152025303540
BOD (mg/l)
- 75 -
Figure 182 Figure 183
Figure 184 Figure 185
Close examination of figures 180 to 185 shows that:
DO concentration ranges 0 mg/l and 12.1 mg/l during 2007. BOD concentration is 2 mg/l and 37
mg/l during year 2010 and 2007. COD concentration ranges between 34 mg/l and 107 mg/l during
year 2007. TDS concentration ranges between 190 mg/l and 1162 mg/l during year 2006 and
2005 respectively. TC count ranges between 33000 MPN/100ml and 113000000 MPN/100 ml
during year 2013 and 2006. FC count ranges between 9300 MPN/100ml and 10500000MPN/100
ml during year 2010 and 2006.
7.14.8 Yamuna at Shergarh, Juhika (U. P.)
The water Quality of river Yamuna at Shergarh, Juhika (U. P.) is monitored for year 2005-13
having 25 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Haryana.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2013 Total
Observations 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 25
Water Quality of River Yamuna at Shergarh , Juhika (U. P.) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 186-191 ):
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 39 55 34 41 55 36 35
Max 79 74 107 75 74 79 35
Mean 61 67.8 79 61.3 65 54.8 35
0
20
40
60
80
100
120COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 386 190 235 220 222 194 298
Max 1162 442 470 452 1042 534 720
Mean 774 299 336.8372.5780.5374.7 509
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400TDS (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 2E+0 2E+0 2E+0 6E+0 9E+0 2E+0 3300
Max 2E+0 1E+0 7E+0 1E+0 1E+0 6E+0 3300
Mean 5E+0 4E+0 4E+0 5E+0 5E+0 2E+0 3300
0
20000000
40000000
60000000
80000000
100000000
120000000TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 2100 2700 1300 1E+0 1700 9300 2300
Max 5E+0 1E+0 2E+0 2E+0 7E+0 4E+0 2300
Mean 1E+0 3E+0 7E+0 8E+0 3E+0 2E+0 2300
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 76 -
Figure 186 Figure 187
Figure 188 Figure 189
Figure 190 Figure 191
Close examination of figures 186 to 191 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 4.1 mg/l and 20.6 mg/l during year 2010 and 2008
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 10 mg/l during year 2008 and 2005
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 21 mg/l and 107 mg/l during year 2013 and
2007. TDS concentration ranges between 70 mg/l and 540 mg/l during year 2006 and 2007
respectively. TC count ranges between 1700 MPN/100ml and 9000000 MPN/100ml during year
2013 and 2008 respectively. FC count ranges between 200 MPN/100ml and 1790000
MPN/100ml during year 2013and 2008 respectively.
7.14.9 River Yamuna at Hasanpur, Mohali (Haryana)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 7.2 7.4 6.6 5.5 4.5 4.1
Max 15.4 18.8 11.3 20.6 13.8 14.7
Mean 9.7 12.75 8.6 10.775 9.95 9.85
0
5
10
15
20
25DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 2 2 2 1 1 2 3
Max 10 10 6 6 7 7 3
Mean 5.75 5.25 3.25 3 4.25 4 3
02468
1012
BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 39 55 34 41 55 36 21
Max 79 74 107 75 74 79 21
Mean 61 67.8 79 61.3 65 54.8 21
0
20
40
60
80
100
120COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 200 70 208 250 186 280 376
Max 292 300 540 340 372 338 376
Mean 245.5155.8 332 285 372 338 376
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
TDS (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 2500 2200 7400 8300 5500 9300 1700
Max 5E+0 3E+0 4E+0 9E+0 4E+0 2E+0 1700
Mean 2E+0 9E+0 2E+0 3E+0 2E+0 6E+0 1700
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 2000 2300 2500 5100 2000 1500 200
Max 1490 4300 3200 2E+0 2E+0 9000 200
Mean 7125 1532 1346 5E+0 6400 4862 200
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 77 -
The water Quality of river Yamuna at Hasanpur, Mohali (Haryana) is monitored for year 2009-
13 having 07 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and Haryana.
Summary of Observation:
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 1 1 2 7
Water Quality of River Yamuna at Hasanpur, Mohali (Haryana) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 192-197 ):
Figure 192 Figure 193
Figure 194 Figure 195
Figure 196 Figure 197
Close examination of figures 192 to 197 shows that:
2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 1 1.35 5 7
Max 1 1.35 5 7
Mean 1 1.35 5 7
012345678
DO (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 11 6 4 6 5
Max 11 26 4 6 5
Mean 11 16 4 6 5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 81 31 21 23 37
Max 81 82 21 23 37
Mean 81 56.5 21 23 37
0
20
40
60
80
100COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 820 280 282 374 266
Max 820 790 282 374 610
Mean 820 535 282 374 438
0
200
400
600
800
1000
TDS (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 6100000 52000 460000 49000
Max 6100000 2400000 460000 49000
Mean 6100000 1226000 460000 49000
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000TC (MPN/100 ml)
2009 2010 2011 2013
Min 7700 7800 93000 33000
Max 7700 1100000 93000 33000
Mean 7700 553900 93000 33000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 78 -
DO concentration ranges between 1 mg/l and 7 mg/l during year 2010 and 2013 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 4 mg/l and 26 mg/l during year 2011 and 2010. COD
concentration ranges between 21 mg/l and 82 mg/l during year 2011 and 2010 respectively. TDS
concentration ranges between 266 mg/l and 820 mg/l during year 2013 and 2009 respectively.
TC count ranges between 49000 MPN/100 ml and 6100000 MPN/110 ml during year 2013 and
2009 respectively. FC count ranges between 7700 MPN/100 ml and 1100000 MPN/110 ml during
year 2009 and 2010 respectively.
7.15 River Chambal at Udi (U.P.)
The water Quality of river Yamuna at Hasanpur, Mohali (Haryana) is monitored for year 2009-
13 having 25 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of U.P. and M.P.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2013 Total
Observations 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 25
Water Quality of River Chambal at Udi (U.P.) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs (from
figures 198-203 ):
Figure 198 Figure 199
Figure 200 Figure 201
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Min 7.3 7.8 6.7 6.9 8 8.6
Max 10.2 11 9.2 9.7 9.7 10.5
Mean 8.2 9.15 7.8758.2758.8759.625
02468
1012
DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
Max 4 2 2 3 3 3 2
Mean 2.75 1.75 1.75 2.25 1.75 2 2
0
1
2
3
4
5BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 7 4 3 9 2 6 13
Max 18 10 14 29 23 12 13
Mean 12 6.25 8.25 14.7511.75 9 13
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35 COD(mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2013
Min 28 20 20 232
Max 140 700 320 232
Mean 92 197.5 153.3 232
0
200
400
600
800TDS(mg/l)
- 79 -
Figure 202 Figure 203
Close examination of figures 198 to 203 shows that:
Concentration of Dissolved Oxygen ranges between 6.7 mg/l and 11.0 mg/l during year 2007 and
2006 respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 4.0 mg/l during the year 2005.
COD concentration ranges between 2 mg/l and 29 mg/l during year 2009 and 2008 respectively.
TDS concentration ranges between 20 mg/l and 700 mg/l in year 2006 and 2007 respectively. TC
count ranges 150 MPN/100ml and 400000 MPN/100ml in year 2010 and 2008 respectively. FC
count 70 MPN/100ml and 36000MPN/100ml during year 2010 and 2008 respectively.
7.16 Water Quality of Indira Gandhi Canal:
Figure 204
Figure 205
Figure 206
Figure 207
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 37006000350067004500 150 1700
Max 45002E+03E+04E+01E+02E+01700
Mean 224272801E+02E+0723358281700
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
Min 270 400 1500 1500 2100 70 80
Max 710010000910036000145005800 80
Mean 2842 3550 3750122757466 3192 80
05000
10000150002000025000300003500040000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
2011 2012 2013 2014
DO 5.6 7.2 6.2 6.4
0
2
4
6
8
DO(mg/l)
2011 2012 2013 2014
BOD 3 1 1 3
0
1
2
3
4 BOD(mg/l)
2011 2013 2014
COD 12 7 27
12
7
27
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
COD (mg/l)
1 2 3
TDS 194 152 166
0
50
100
150
200
250
TDS(mg/l)
- 80 -
2011 2013 2014
TC 24000 2000 2600
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000 TC (MPN/100 ml)
Figure 208
Figure 209
Close examination of figures 204 to 209 shows that:
BOD concentration is meeting the maximum limit of 3.0 mg/l in year 2010. Minimum and
maximum BOD concentration is 1.0 mg/l and 4.0 mg/l respectively. COD concentration ranges
between 4.0 mg/l and 22 mg/l during year 2009 and 2011 respectively. Minimum TDS
concentration is 146mg/l in year 2013. Maximum TDS concentration is 317 mg/l in year 2011.
Minimum count of TC is 2300MPN/100ml in year 2011. Maximum count of TC is
4600000MPN/100ml in year 2009. Minimum count of FC is 400 MPN/100ml in year 2010.
Maximum count of FC is 250000 MPN/100ml in year 2009.
7.17 Water Quality of River Vardha at Bangaon Village near Pandhurana Village (M.
P.)
Water Quality of River Vardha at Bangaon Village near Pandhurana Village (M. P.) is
monitored for year 2006-12 having 12 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of
M.P. and Maharashtra.
Summary of observations:
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 1 2 1 3 1 2 2 12
Water Quality of Water Quality of River Vardha at Bangaon Village near Pandhurana Village
(M. P.) during 2006-2013 is depicted in graphs (from figures 210-215 ):
Figure 210 Figure 211
2011 2013 2014
FC 4300 2000 680
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
FC(MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 6.2 6.2 9.1 6.42 6.8 5.2 5.4
Max 6.2 7.7 9.1 7.84 6.8 6.8 6.2
Mean 6.2 6.95 9.1 6.93 6.8 6 5.8
02468
10
DO (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 6 2 2.3 1 3.9 1.9 2.36
Max 6 2.2 2.3 2 3.9 2.7 2.9
Mean 6 2.1 2.3 1.33 3.9 2.3 2.6
01234567
BOD (mg/l)
- 81 -
Figure 212 Figure 213
Figure 214 Figure 215
Close examination of figures 210 to 215 shows that:
Dissolved Oxygen concentration ranges between 5.2 mg/l and 9.1 mg/l during year 2006 and 2008
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 6.0 mg/l during year 2009 and
2006 respectively. COD concentration ranges between 7.0 mg/l and 29.0 mg/l during year 2009
and 2010 respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 8 mg/l and 305 mg/l during the year
2009. TC concentration ranges between 18 mg/l and 350 mg/l during year 2009 and 2012
respectively. FC ranges between 3 mg/l and 180 mg/l during year 2009 and 2012 respectively.
7.18.1 Water quality of River Mahi at Village Bajna, Ratlam (M. P.)
Water quality of River Mahi at Village Bajna, Ratlam (M. P.) is monitored for year 2006-12
having 18 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of M.P. and Rajasthan .
Summary of observations:
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 1 2 4 4 3 2 2 18
Water Quality of River Mahi at Village Bajna, Ratlam (M. P.) during 2006-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 216-221):
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
Min 24 11.5 12 7 29 8
Max 24 11.5 12 13 29 8
Mean 24 11.5 12 9.3 29 8
05
101520253035
COD (mg/l)
2006
2007
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 12 28 8 165 206 22
Max 12 28 305 165 206 22
Mean 12 2007 166.3 165 206 22
0500
1000150020002500
TDS (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 320 110 160 18 68 30 250
Max 320 220 160 35 68 49 350
Mean 320 165 160 25 68 39.5 300
0
100
200
300
400
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 70 14 20 3 18 7 110
Max 70 18 20 8 18 7 180
Mean 70 16 20 5 18 7 145
0
50
100
150
200FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 82 -
Figure 216 Figure 217
Figure 218 Figure 219
Figure 220 Figure 221
Close examination of figures 216 to 221 shows that:
DO concentration is meeting to the prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l except in year 2006. DO
concentration ranges between 4.7 mg/l and 9.72 mg/l during year 2006 and 2009 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 20.0 mg/l during year 2007/ 2008 and 2006
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 6.0 mg/l and 27.0 mg/l during year 2010 and
2006 respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 25 mg/l in year 2006 and 2009
respectively. TC count ranges between 15 MPN/100 ml and 460 MPN/100 ml during year 2009
and 2006 respectively. FC count ranges between 2 MPN/100 ml and 160 MPN/100 ml in year
2009 and 2012 respectively.
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 4.7 7 5.9 5.08 5.8 5.7 5.8
Max 4.7 8.5 9.03 9.72 7.3 7.11 5.8
Mean 4.7 7.75 7.11 6.78 6.33 6.4 5.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
DO (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 20 1 1 2 2.2 1.5 2
Max 20 2.8 2 3 7.6 2.4 5
Mean 20 1.9 1.3 2.25 4.1 2 3.5
0
5
10
15
20
25BOD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012
Min 27 10 11 7 6 10
Max 27 15 26 17 26.8 10
Mean 27 12.5 18 11.3 13.64 10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30COD (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 25 40 95 152 142 27 38
Max 25 40 95 185 164 27 38
Mean 25 40 95 171 153 27 38
0
50
100
150
200
TDS (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 460 140 120 15 62 27 210
Max 460 416 145 80 115 65 440
Mean 460 278 132.538.66 88.5 46 325
0
100
200
300
400
500TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 110 20 25 2 4 4 110
Max 110 22 28 16 32 5 160
Mean 110 21 26.5 7 18 4.5 135
0
50
100
150
200FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 83 -
7.18.2 Water quality of River Mahi at Bajaj Sagar Dam at Gammon Bridge, Nr. Bansawara
(Rajasthan)
Water quality of River Mahi at Bajaj Sagar Dam at Gammon Bridge, Nr. Bansawara (Rajasthan) is
monitored for year 2006-12 having 19 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of M.P.
and Rajasthan .
Summary of observation:
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 1 3 4 4 3 2 2 19
Water Quality of River Mahi at Bajaj sagar Dam at Gammon Bridge, Nr. Bansawara (Rajasthan)
during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs (from figures 222-227 ):
Figure 222 Figure 223
Figure 224 Figure 225
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 4 6.85 5.66 5.72 5.2 5.9 6.6
Max 4 8 7.19 8.65 7.5 7.32 6.6
Mean 4 7.35 6.28 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 6 6.8 1 4 2.2 1.7 1.9
Max 6 8 3 4 6.4 3 3
Mean 6 7.3 2.1 4 3.7 2.4 2.5
02468
10
BOD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012
Min 32 8 7 12 6 8
Max 32 26 7 22 26.5 8
Mean 32 18.7 7 16.33 14.16 8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35COD (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 5 33 103 110 26 390 198
Max 5 33 103 110 26 390 198
Mean 5 33 103 110 26 390 198
0
100
200
300
400
500TDS(mg/l)
- 84 -
Figure 226 Figure 227
Close examination of figures 222 to 227 shows that:
Dissolved Oxygen concentration ranges between 4.0 mg/l and 8.65 mg/l during 2006 and 2009
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 8.0 mg/l during year 2008 and 2007
respectively. COD concentration is 6.0 mg/l and 32.0 mg/l during year 2010 and 2006. TDS
concentration ranges between 5.0 mg/l and 390 mg/l during year 2006 and 2011. TC ranges
between 23 mg/l and 320 mg/l during year 2009 and 2012 respectively. FC count ranges between 4
mg/l and 140 mg/l during year 2009 and 2012.
7.19 Water Quality of River Chambal at Fish farm , Gandhisagar Dam, (M.P.)
Water Quality of River Chambal at Fish farm, Gandhisagar Dam, (M.P.) is monitored for year
2006-12 having 19 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of M.P. and Rajasthan .
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 1 3 4 4 3 2 2 19
Water Quality of River Chambal at Fish farm , Gandhisagar Dam, (M.P.) during 2006-2012 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 228-233 ):
Figure 228 Figure 229
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 220 180 170 23 79 60 120
Max 220 310 192 58 108 97 320
Mean 220 238 182.3 40.3 93.5 78.5 220
050
100150200250300350
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 30 17 8 4 7 9 90
Max 30 75 72 10 28 12 140
Mean 30 50.3 50 6.3 17.5 10.5 115
0
50
100
150FC (MPN/100ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 6.69 6.7 6.13 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.8
Max 6.69 9.2 8.5 9.82 7.2 9.2 6.8
Mean 6.69 7.5 6.7 7.5 6.8 7.9 6.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12DO (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 26 1.2 1 1 1.7 1.5 2
Max 26 3.1 3 2 4.7 2.5 8
Mean 26 2.4 1.75 1.75 2.9 2 5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30BOD (mg/l)
- 85 -
Figure 230 Figure 231
Figure 232 Figure 233
Close examination of figures 228 to 233 shows that:
Dissolved Oxygen ranges between 6.13 mg/l and 9.82 mg/l during year 2008 and 2009
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 26.0 mg/l during year 2008 and
2009 respectively. COD concentration ranges 7.0 mg/l and 37.0 mg/l during year 2008/2010 and
year 2006 respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 2.0 mg/l and 441.0 mg/l during year
2009 and 2011 respectively. TC ranges between 19 mg/l and 380 mg/l during year 2009 and 2008
respectively. FC count ranges between 3.0 MPN/100 and 360MPN/100 ml during year 2009 and
year 2006 respectively.
7. 20 Water Quality of River Krishna at Kurundwad, Kolhapur (Maharashtra)
Water Quality of River Krishna at Kurundwad, Kolhapur (Maharashtra) is monitored for year
2005-11 having 10 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Maharashtra and Andhra
Pradesh.
Summary of Observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Observations 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 10
Water Quality of River Krishna at Kurundwad, Kolhapur (Maharashtra) during 2005-2011 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 234-239 ):
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
Min 37 8 7 8 7 24.39
Max 37 8 7 17 26.5 24.39
Mean 37 8 7 12.3 16.75 24.4
010203040
COD (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 101 17 80 2 122 441 249
Max 101 17 80 139 128 441 249
Mean 101 17 80 90 125 441 249
0
100
200
300
400
500TDS (mg/l)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 360 220 215 19 90 42 150
Max 360 368 380 110 145 100 180
Mean 360 318 275 53 117 71 165
0
100
200
300
400
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 90 18 25 3 7 4 60
Max 360 24 35 32 29 9 80
Mean 360 22 29.3 14.3 18 6.5 70
0
100
200
300
400
FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 86 -
Figure 234 Figure 235
Figure 236 Figure 237
Figure 238 Figure 239
Close examination of figures 214 to 219 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 5.4 mg/l and 11.5 mg/l during year 2006 and 2005 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 0.6 mg/l and 4.6 mg/l during year 2006 and 2008
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 2.7 mg/l and 36.0 mg/l during year 2011 and
2009. TDS concentration ranges between 4.0 mg/l and 28.0 mg/l during year 2006 and 2009. TC
concentration ranges between 1700 MPN/100 ml and 5000 MPN/100 ml during year 2006 and
2007/2008 respectively. FC count ranges between 800 MPN/100 ml and 2800 MPN/100 ml in
year 2006 and 2008 respectively.
7.21 Water Quality of River Bhima at Takli, Solapur (Maharashtra)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 11.5 5.4 9.3 5.8 7.5 6 8.6
Max 11.5 6.5 9.3 11 7.5 6 8.6
Mean 11.5 5.95 9.3 8.4 7.5 6 8.6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 1.3 0.6 1.6 1.2 2.7 1.1 1.3
Max 1.3 1 1.6 4.6 2.7 1.1 1.3
Mean 1.3 0.8 1.6 2.9 2.7 1.1 1.3
0
1
2
3
4
5BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 22 14 18 8.8 36 9.4 2.7
Max 22 15 18 15 36 9.4 2.7
Mean 22 14.5 18 11.9 36 9.4 2.7
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 8 4 6.8 4.2 28 21 22
Max 8 12 6.8 5.8 28 21 22
Mean 8 8 6.8 5 28 21 22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30TDS (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008
Min 1700 5000 5000
Max 3000 5000 5000
Mean 2350 5000 5000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
TC (MPN/100ml)
2006 2007 2008
Min 800 2200 2800
Max 1300 2400 2800
Mean 1050 2300 2800
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 87 -
Water Quality of River Bhima at Takli, Solapur (Maharashtra) is monitored for year 2005-11
having 09 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Maharashtra and Karnataka .
Summary of Observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Observations 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 9
Water Quality of River Bhima at Takli, Solapur (Maharashtra) during 2005-2011 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 240-245):
Figure 240 Figure 241
Figure 242 Figure 243
Figure 244 Figure 245
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2011
Min 8.4 6.8 8.8 10.4 7.5 7.1
Max 8.4 6.8 8.8 11.2 7.5 7.1
Mean 8.4 6.8 8.8 10.8 7.5 7.1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 2 1 3 2.1 2.7 2 3.4
Max 2 1.4 3 5.7 2.7 2 3.4
Mean 2 1.2 3 3.9 2.7 2 3.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 32 18 19 8.2 36 22 31.2
Max 32 32 19 25 36 22 31.2
Mean 32 25 19 16.6 36 22 31.2
05
10152025303540
COD (mg/l)
2006 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 15 12.3 36 22 26
Max 30 12.3 36 22 26
Mean 22.5 12.3 36 22 26
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40TDS (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008
Min 90 110 700
Max 500 110 700
Mean 295 110 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006 2007 2008
Min 70 40 500
Max 170 40 500
Mean 120 40 500
0
100
200
300
400
500
600FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 88 -
Close examination of figures 240 to 245 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.8 mg/l and 11.2 mg/l during year 2006 and 2008 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 5.7 mg/l during year 2006 and 2008
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 8.2 mg/l and 36.0 mg/l during year 2008 and
2009 respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 12.3 mg/l and 36.0 mg/l during year 2008
and 2009 respectively. TC concentration ranges between 90 MPN/100 ml and 700 MPN/100 ml
during year 2006 and 2008 respectively. FC concentration ranges between 40 MPN/100 ml and
500 MPN/100 ml during year 2007 and 2008.
7.22 Water Quality of River Mahi at Kadana Dam (Gujarat)
Water Quality of River Mahi at Kadana Dam (Gujarat) is monitored for year 2005-12 having 08
Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Gujarat and Rajasthan.
Summary of Observations:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2012 Total
Observations 1 3 1 2 1 8
Water Quality of River Mahi at Kadana Dam (Gujarat) during 2005-2012 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 246-251):
Figure 246 Figure 247
Figure 248 Figure 249
2005 2006 2007 2008 2012
Min 4.5 4.7 8.7 4.6 5.9
Max 4.5 9.3 8.7 6.2 5.9
Mean 4.5 6.4 8.7 5.4 5.9
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2012
Min 0.7 1 1.1 2.2 0.93
Max 0.7 1.4 1.1 3 0.93
Mean 0.7 1.16 1.1 2.6 0.93
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5BOD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2012
Min 18 12 14 13 6.7
Max 18 31 14 13 6.7
Mean 18 18.66 14 13 6.7
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2012
Min 54 1.2 9 9 192
Max 54 5.7 9 9 192
Mean 54 3.9 9 9 192
0
50
100
150
200
250TDS (mg/l)
- 89 -
Figure 250 Figure 251
Close examination of figures 246 to 251 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 4.5 mg/l and 9.3 mg/l during year 2005 and 2006 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 0.7 mg/l and 3.0 mg/l during year 2005 and 2008
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 12 mg/l and 31 mg/l during the year 2006. TDS
concentration ranges between 9 mg/l and 192 mg/ during year 2007/2008 and 2012. TC
concentration ranges between 40 MPN/100 ml and 90000 MPN/100 ml during the year 2006. FC
concentration ranges between 20 MPN/100 ml and 90000 MPN/100 ml in the year 2006.
7.23 River Tapi at Nizhar (Gujarat)
Water Quality of River Tapi at Nizhar (Gujarat) is monitored for year 2006-12 having 05
Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Gujarat and Maharashtra.
Year 2006 2008 2012 Total
Observations 2 2 1 5
Water Quality of River Tapi at Nizhar (Gujarat) during 2006-2012 is depicted in graphs (from
figures 252-255 ):
Figure 252 Figure 253
2005 2006 2007 2008
Min 3000 40 220 40
Max 3000 90000 220 1700
Mean 3000 30280 220 870
020000400006000080000
100000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005 2006 2007 2008
Min 1400 40 110 20
Max 1400 90000 110 1100
Mean 1400 30280 110 560
020000400006000080000
100000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
2006 2008 2012
Min 7.1 8 5.6
Max 7.2 8.1 5.6
Mean 7.2 8.1 5.6
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2006 2008 2012
Min 1 2.7 2.41
Max 1.5 5.5 2.41
Mean 1.3 4.1 2.41
0
1
2
3
4
5
6BOD (mg/l)
- 90 -
Figure 254 Figure 255
Close examination of figures 252 to 255 shows that:
Dissolved Oxygen ranges between 5.6 mg/l and 8.1 during year 2012 and 2008 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 5.5 mg/l during year 2006 and 2008
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 11 mg/l and 30.3 mg/l during year 2008 and
year 2012 respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 7.4 mg/l and 191 mg/l during year
2012 and 2006 respectively.
7.24 River Tapi at Prakasha (Maharashtra)
Water Quality of River Tapi at Prakasha (Maharashtra) is monitored for year 2006-12 having 05
Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Maharashtra and Gujarat.
Year 2006 2008 2011 2012 Total
Observations 2 1 1 1 5
Water Quality of River Tapi at Prakasha (Maharashtra) during 2006-2012 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 256-260 ):
Figure 256 Figure 257
2006 2008 2012
Min 19 11 30.3
Max 24 17 30.3
Mean 21.5 14 30.3
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2006 2008 2012
Min 41 9.4 7.4
Max 191 9.4 7.4
Mean 116 9.4 7.4
0
50
100
150
200
250TDS (mg/l)
2006 2008 2011 2012
Min 8 8.8 9.7 9
Max 8.5 8.8 9.7 9
Mean 8.3 8.8 9.7 9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
DO (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2011 2012
Min 0.5 0 3.3 6.3 5.71
Max 8.3 0 3.3 6.3 5.71
Mean 4.4 0 3.3 6.3 5.71
0
2
4
6
8
10
BOD (mg/l)
- 91 -
Figure 258 Figure 259
Figure 260
Close examination of figures 256 to 260 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between is 8.0 mg/l and 9.7 mg/l during 2006 and 2011 respectively. to
the maximum prescribed limit of 3.0 mg/l. Concentration of BOD ranges between 0.5 mg/l and
8.3 mg/l during 2007 and 2012 respectively. COD Concentration ranges between 18 mg/l and
69 mg/l. TDS ranges between 7.5mg/l and 123 mg/l. TC count ranges between 2300 MPN/100
ml and 9000MPN/100 ml.
7.25 River Tapi at Ajnad Shahjani (Maharashtra):
Water Quality of River Tapi at Ajnad Shahjani (Maharashtra) is monitored for year 2006-12
having 06 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Gujarat and Maharashtra.
Year 2006 2007 2008 2011 2012 Total
Observations 2 1 1 1 1 6
Water Quality of River Tapi at Ajnad (Maharashtra) during 2006-2012 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 261-264 ):
2006 2007 2008 2011 2012
Min 18 0 13.3 31 6.36
Max 69 0 13.3 31 6.36
Mean 43.5 0 13.3 31 6.36
0
20
40
60
80 COD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2011 2012
Min 53 0 7.5 13.5
Max 123 0 7.5 13.5
Mean 88 0 7.5 13.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140TDS (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008
Min 2300 0 9000
Max 9000 0 9000
Mean 5650 0 9000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000 TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 92 -
Figure 261 Figure 262
Figure 263 Figure 264
Close examination of figures 261 to 264 shows that:
DO concentration is meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l. DO concentration
ranges between 7.1 mg/l and14.5 mg/l in the same year i.e. 2006. BOD concentration ranges
between 0.7 mg/l and 12.6 mg/l during year 2006 & 2011 respectively. COD ranges between
14 mg/l and 35 mg/l during year 2006 & 2011 respectively. TDS ranges between 9.2 mg/l
and 26 mg/l in year 2006.
7.26 River Narmada at Navagam (Gujarat)
Water Quality of River Narmada at Navagam (Gujarat) is monitored for year 2006-12 having 08
Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Gujarat and M.P.
Summary of Observation
Year 2006 2007 2008 2011 2012 Total
Observations 3 1 2 1 1 8
Water Quality of River Narmada at Navagam (Gujarat) during 2006-2012 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 265-268 ):
2006 2008 2011 2012
Min 7.1 8.2 13 11
Max 14.5 8.2 13 11
Mean 10.8 8.2 13 11
0
5
10
15
20
DO (mg/l)
2006 2008 2011 2012
Min 0.7 2.4 12.6 3.4
Max 3 2.4 12.6 3.4
Mean 1.9 2.4 12.6 3.4
0
5
10
15
BOD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2011 2012
Min 14 14.1 35 16
Max 31 14.1 35 16
Mean 22.5 14.1 35 16
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2006 2011 2012
Min 9.2 25 20
Max 26 25 20
Mean 17.6 25 20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30TDS (mg/l)
- 93 -
Figure 265 Figure 266
Figure 267 Figure 268
Close examination of figures 265 to 268 shows that during:
DO concentration ranges between 4.8 mg/l and 9.84 mg/l during year 2008 and 2011
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 0.8 mg/l and 3.5 mg/l during year 2006 and
2011 respectively. COD concentration ranges between 1.8 mg/l and 21 mg/l during year 2006
and 2008 respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 6.0 mg/l and 61.0 mg/l during year
2008 and 2006 respectively.
7.27 River Wainganga at Bapera, Bhandara (Maharashtra)
Water Quality of River Wainganga at Bapera, Bhandara (Maharashtra) is monitored for year
2006-12 having 07 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Maharashtra and M.P.
Year 2006 2007 2008 2012 Total
Observations 2 2 2 1 7
Water Quality of River Wainganga at Bapera, Bhandara (Maharashtra) during 2006-2012 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 269-274 ):
2006 2007 2008 2011 2012
Min 6.6 9 4.8 9.84 7.6
Max 7.7 9 6.8 9.84 7.6
Mean 7.3 9 5.8 9.84 7.6
02468
1012
DO (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2011 2012
Min 0.8 1 1.4 3.35 3.5
Max 1.5 1 2.2 3.35 3.5
Mean 1.3 1 1.8 3.35 3.5
0
1
2
3
4BOD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2011 2012
Min 1.8 11 9.4 15.6 21
Max 17 11 21 15.6 21
Mean 9.9 11 15.2 15.6 21
0
5
10
15
20
25COD (mg/l)
2006 2008 2012
Min 7.2 6 55
Max 61 6 55
Mean 34.1 6 55
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
TDS (mg/l)
- 94 -
Figure 269 Figure 270
Figure 271 Figure 272
Figure 273 Figure 274
Close examination of figures 269 to 274 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 5.8 mg/l and 8.2 mg/l during 2008 and 2007 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 0.3 mg/l and 1.7mg/l during the year 2007. COD
concentration ranges between 8.0 mg/l and 34 mg/l. TDS concentration ranges between 13 mg/l
in year 2008 and 84 mg/l in year 2012. TC count ranges between 170 MPN/100ml and 9000
MPN/100ml during year 2007 and 2008 respectively. FC count ranges between 130
MPN/100ml and 5000 MPN/100ml during in year 2007 and 2008 respectively.
7.28 Water Quality of River Damanganga at Jarry Causeway D/S of CETP discharge
2006 2007 2008 2012
Min 6.1 5.8 7.2 6.4
Max 6.7 8.2 7.7 6.4
Mean 6.4 7 7.5 6.4
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2012
Min 0.3 1 1.1 0.92
Max 1 1.7 1.3 0.92
Mean 0.7 1.4 1.2 0.92
0
0.5
1
1.5
2BOD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2012
Min 11 8.5 8 34
Max 16 15 24 34
Mean 13.5 11.8 16 34
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008 2012
Min 15 26 13 84
Max 15 26 13 84
Mean 15 26 13 84
0
20
40
60
80
100
TDS (mg/l)
2006 2007 2008
Min 220 170 1700
Max 3000 2200 9000
Mean 1610 1185 5350
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2006 2007 2008
Min 140 130 1300
Max 2400 1700 5000
Mean 1270 915 3150
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000FC (MPN/100ml)
- 95 -
Water Quality of River Damanganga at Jarry Causeway D/S of CETP discharge is monitored for
year 2006-12 having 07 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Maharashtra and
M.P.
Summary of observations:
Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2103 Total
Observation 3 2 2 2 4 4 1 18
Water Quality of River Damanganga at Jerry Causeway D/S of CETP discharge during 2007-
2013 is depicted in graphs (from figures 275-278):
Figure 275 Figure 276
Figure 277 Figure 278
Close examination of figure 275 to 278 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 0.3 mg/l and 8.47 mg/l during year 2010 and 2012
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1.41 mg/l and 29 mg/l in year 2012. in year
2010. Minimum COD concentration was observed 26 mg/l in year 2008 whereas maximum
COD concentration was observed 270 mg/l in year 2012. Minimum TDS concentration was
observed 192 mg/l in year 2011 whereas Maximum TDS concentration was observed31262 mg/l
in year 2010.
7.29 River Damanganga at U/S of CETP discharge GIDC Weir
Water Quality of River Damanganga at U/S of CETP discharge GIDC Weir is monitored for year
2006-12 having 07 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Maharashtra and M.P.
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 1.5 5.6 7.2 0.3 0.94 3.8
Max 6.4 6.4 8.3 4.3 7.18 3.8
Mean 3.3 6 7.8 2.3 3.9 3.8
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 2.3 5 3.2 17 3.3 24
Max 15 5 3.5 29 13 24
Mean 7.8 5 3.4 23 7.3 24
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35BOD (mg/l)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 37 26 34 101 36 270
Max 224 38 216 150 154 270
Mean 130.5 32 125 125.5 99.5 270
0
50
100
150
200
250
300COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 446 29325 192 18105
Max 25674 31262 27387 18105
Mean 13060 30293 11359 18105
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000TDS (mg/l)
- 96 -
Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observation 3 2 2 2 4 4 1 18
Water Quality of River Damanganga at U/S of CETP discharge GIDC Weir during 2007-2013 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 279-282 ):
Figure 279 Figure 280
Figure 281 Figure 282
Close examination of figures 279 to 282 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.1 mg/l and 9.1 mg/l during year 2008 and 2010 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 0.7 mg/l and 4.2 mg/l during 2007 and 2011 respectively.
COD concentration ranges between 4.3 mg/l and 32 mg/l between during 2007 and 2010
respectively. TDS concentration was observed 156 mg/l and 242 mg/l during 2011 and 2009
respectively.
7.30 River Indravati at Nowrangpur (Orissa)
Water Quality of River Indravati at Nowrangpur (Orissa) is monitored for year 2005-13 having 14
Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Orissa and Chhattisgarh.
Summary of observation:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 14
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 7.1 6.1 7.2 7.1 7.3 8.4
Max 7.4 7.1 8.3 9.1 9 8.4
Mean 7.3 6.6 7.8 8.1 8 8.4
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 0.7 1.2 0.8 1.4 0.85 2.3
Max 2.3 2 1.1 2 4.2 2.3
Mean 1.5 1.6 1 1.7 3 2.3
0
1
2
3
4
5
BOD (mg/l)
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 8.6 10 18 15 9 8
Max 32 11 23 27 15 8
Mean 17.9 10.5 20.5 21 12 8
05
101520253035
COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 156 176 121 187
Max 236 198 180 187
Mean 196 187 145 187
0
50
100
150
200
250TDS (mg/l)
- 97 -
Water Quality of River Indravati at Nowrangpur (Orissa) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 283-288):
Figure 283 Figure 284
Figure 285 Figure 286
Figure 286 Figure 288
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 6.8 8 7.2 7 7.2 6.6 7.4 6.1 7.6
Max 7 8 7.2 7 7.7 6.6 7.4 7.8 7.6
Mean 6.9 8 7.2 7 7.5 6.6 7.4 7.1 7.6
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 1.1 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Max 1.1 3 2 2 2 3.1 2 2 2
Mean 1.1 3 2 2 2 2.6 2 2 2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 23 2 3.2 16
Max 23 2 3.2 16
Mean 23 2 3.2 16
0
5
10
15
20
25
COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 52 28 11
Max 52 28 11
Mean 52 28 11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60TDS (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 4500860032008000600 80042007070408
Max 1120860032008000270080042001326408
Mean 7850860032008000117080042001091408
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000TC (MPN/100ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 63 190800290200200100816141
Max 200190800290690200100400141
Mean 132190800290303200100238141
010002000300040005000600070008000
FC (MPN/100ml)
- 98 -
Close examination of figures 283 to 288 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.1 mg/l and 8.0mg/l during year 2012 and 2006 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between ranges between 1.1 mg/l and 3.1 mg/l during 2005 and 2010
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 2mg/l and 23 mg/l during year 2010 and 2009
respectively. TDS ranges between 11 mg/l and 52mg/l during year 2011 and 2009 respectively.
TC count ranges between 408 MPN/100 ml and 27000 MPN/100 ml during year 2013 and 2009
respectively. FC count ranges between 63 MPN/100 ml and 6900 MPN/100 ml during year 2005
and 2009 respectively.
7.31 Water Quality of River Mahanadi at Hirakund (Orissa)
Water Quality of Water Quality of River Mahanadi at Hirakund (Orissa) is monitored for year
2005-13 having 14 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Orissa and Chhattisgarh .
Summary of observation:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 14
Water Quality of River Mahanadi at Hirakund (Orissa) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 289-294):
Figure 289 Figure 290
Figure 291 Figure 292
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 7.2 7.3 7.4 7 7 7.7 7.3 6.4 7.7
Max 7.2 7.3 7.4 7 7.6 7.7 7.3 8.3 7.7
Mean 7.2 7.3 7.4 7 7.3 7.7 7.3 7.4 7.7
02468
10
DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 0 0 1 3 2 2 0 2
Max 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 2
Mean 0 0 1 3 2.3 2 0 2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 15 7 6.8
Max 15 7 6.8
Mean 15 7 6.8
0
5
10
15
20COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 30 15 11
Max 30 15 11
Mean 30 15 11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
TDS (mg/l)
- 99 -
Figure 293 Figure 294
Close examination of figures 289 to 294 shows that:
DO concentration is meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l in each observation.
Concentration of DO ranges between 6.4 mg/l and 7.7 mg/l during year 2012 and 2010
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 3.0 mg/l during year 2005 and
2009 respectively. COD concentration ranges between 6.8 mg/l and 15 mg/l during 2011 and
2009 respectively. TDS ranges between 11 mg/l and 30mg/l during year 2011 and 2009
respectively. TC count ranges between 816 MPN/100ml and 97600 MPN/100 ml during year
2012 and 2006 respectively. FC count ranges between 100 MPN/100 ml and 28280 MPN/100 ml
during year 2005 and 2013 respectively.
7.32 River Churni at Bijoypur (West Bengal)
Water Quality of Water Quality of River Churni at Bijoypur (West Bengal) is monitored for year
2005-13 having 17 Number of observations at the boundary of West Bengal and Bangladesh .
Summary of observation:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 1 2 2 1 3 1 3 3 1 17
Water Quality of River Churni at Bijoypur (West Bengal) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 295-300 ):
Figure 295 Figure 296
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 560976370540170190390816306
Max 101976370540177190390132306
Mean 785976370540880190390736306
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000TC (MPN/100ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 100 180 900 110 500 600 120 204 282
Max 100 180 900 110 400 600 120 430 282
Mean 100 180 900 110 190 600 120 207 282
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
FC (MPN/100ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 3.2 1 1 5.8 1 0.9 0 0.3
Max 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.8 4.2 0.9 2.3 1.8
Mean 3.2 2.1 2.1 5.8 3.1 0.9 0.9 0.9
01
234
56
7DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 3 2 4 3 5 15 4.6 10 7.5
Max 3 12 7 3 9 15 16 31 7.5
Mean 3 7 5.5 3 7 15 10.5 21 7.5
05
101520253035
BOD (mg/l)
- 100 -
Figure 297 Figure 298
Figure 299 Figure 300
Close examination of figures 283 to 288 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 5.8 during year 2011 and year 2010 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 2 mg/l and 31.0 mg/l during year 2006 and 2012 respectively.
COD concentration ranges between 8 mg/l and 121 in year 2009. TDS concentration ranges
between 31 mg/l and 239 mg/l during year 2010 and 2009 respectively. TC count ranges between
1224 MPN/100 ml and 146000 MPN/100 ml during the year 2012. FC count ranges between 204
MPN/100 ml and 30600 MPN/100 ml during the year 2012.
7.33Water Quality of River Damodar
Water Quality of River Damodar is monitored at two locations: (i) Sindri (Jharkhand) and
Dishergarh (West Bengal) at interstate boundaries of West Bengal and Jharkhand.
7.33.1 River Damodar at Sindri (Jharkhand)
Water Quality of River Damodar at Sindri (Jharkhand) is monitored at is monitored for 2005-13
having 17 Number of observations at the boundary of West Bengal and Jharkhand.
Summary of observation:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 1 17
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 8 53 78 121
Max 8 53 78 121
Mean 8 53 78 121
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 239 31 102
Max 239 31 102
Mean 239 31 102
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
TDS(mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 410 1E+ 380 114 587 1E+ 750 122 166
Max 410 1E+ 960 114 587 1E+ 123 927 166
Mean 410 1E+ 499 114 587 1E+ 990 369 166
020000400006000080000
100000120000140000160000
TC (MPN/100ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 150960100240420270120204164
Max 150960236240420270430306164
Mean 150960123240420270275106164
05000
100001500020000250003000035000
FC(MPN/100ml)
- 101 -
Water Quality of River River Damodar at Sindri (Jharkhand) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 301-304 ):
Figure 301 Figure 302
Figure 303 Figure 304
Close examination of figures 301 to 304 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 4.9 mg/l and 8.9 mg/l during year 2012 and 2013 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 3.0 mg/l. TC count ranges between 1734
MPN/100 ml and 61200 MPN/100 ml during year 2013 and 2005 respectively. FC count ranges
between 600 MPN/100 ml and 52000 MPN/100 ml during year 2012and 2007 respectively.
7.33.2 Water Quality of River Damodar at Dishergarh (West Bengal)
Water Quality of River Damodar at at Dishergarh (West Bengal) is monitored for 2005-13 having
17 Number of observations at the boundary of West Bengal and Jharkhand.
Summary of observation:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 1 17
Water Quality of River Damodar at Dishergarh (West Bengal) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 305-309):
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 7 8 6.9 7.6 7.1 7 7 4.9 8.9
Max 8.2 8 8 7.6 7.5 7 8.8 8.5 8.9
Mean 7.6 8 7.4 7.6 7.3 7 7.9 7.1 8.9
02468
10
DO(mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 3 3 1 2 2 0 2 2
Max 3 3 3 2 2 0 3 2
Mean 3 3 2 2 2 0 2.5 2
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 208 1E+ 290 500 310 355 470 510 173
Max 612 1E+ 800 500 1E+ 355 298 265 173
Mean 410 1E+ 545 500 686 355 147 132 173
020000400006000080000
100000120000140000160000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 800405230150130117120600111
Max 120405520150128117170171111
Mean 100405316150676117150101111
0100002000030000400005000060000
FC (MPN/100ml)
- 102 -
Figure 305 Figure 306
Figure 307 Figure 308
Figure 309
Close examination of figures 305 to 309 shows that:
DO concentration is meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l in each
observation. DO concentration ranges between is 6.1 mg/l and 9.3 mg/l during year 2012
BOD concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 3.0 mg/l during year 2010 and 2008
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 6 mg/l and 28 mg/l between year 2010
and 2009 respectively. TC count ranges between 200 MPN/100ml and 448000
MPN/100ml during year 2007 and 2009 respectively. FC count ranges between 300
MPN/100ml and 83600 MPN/100ml during year 2007 and year 2006/ 2007 respectively.
7.34 Water Quality of River Subarnarekha
7.34.1 River Subarnarekha at Behragora (Jharkhand)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 6.5 7.2 7.1 8.2 7.2 7.4 7.2 6.1 8.5
Max 8 7.2 7.5 8.2 7.3 7.4 8.1 9.3 8.5
Mean 7.3 7.2 7.3 8.2 7.2 7.47.747.7 8.5
0123456789
10DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
Min 3 2 1 3 1 0 2 2
Max 3 2 2 3 2 0 2.6 2
Mean 3 2 1.7 3 1.7 0 2.3 2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 28 6 12 8
Max 28 6 12 8
Mean 28 6 12 8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 11802E+0200580069002460720011225100
Max 30602E+02E+058004E+04510461032105100
Mean 21202E+0685358002E+03826316319205100
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000TC (MPN/100ml)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Min 700 83600 300 2500 10100 11300 2800 3060 2222
Max 4000 83600 83600 2500 54100 14400 7100 8080 2222
Mean 2350 83600 29333 2500 30366 13367 4533.3 5013.3 2222
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000FC (MPN/100ml)
- 103 -
Water Quality of River Subarnarekha at Behragora (Jharkhand) is monitored for 2005-13 having
17 Number of observations at the international boundary of Jharkhand and Odisha.
Summary of observation:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 1 17
Water Quality of River Subarnarekha at Behragora (Jharkhand) during 2005-2013 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 310-316 ):
Figure 310 Figure 311
Figure 312 Figure 313
Figure 314 Figure 315
Close examination of figures 310 to 316 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.8 mg/l and 9.7 mg/l during year 2005 and 2011. BOD
concentration ranges between 0.0 mg/l and 3.0 mg/l during year 2006 and 2012. COD concentration
ranges between 0 mg/l and 13.0 mg/l during year 2009 and 2010. Concentration of TDS ranges
between 7 MPN/100 ml and 47 MPN/100 ml during year 2011 and 2009. TC count ranges between
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 6.8 8.2 7.3 7.2 7 7 7.1 7.1 7.8
Max 8.5 8.2 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.8 9.7 9.1 7.8
Mean 7.7 8.2 7.3 7.2 7.3 7.4 8.5 8 7.8
02468
1012
DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012
Min 1 0 1 3 2 3 3
Max 1 0 2 3 3 3 3
Mean 1 0 1.5 3 2.5 3 3
0
1
2
3
4BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 0 13 10
Max 0 13 10
Mean 0 13 10
0
5
10
15COD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011
Min 47 15 7
Max 47 15 7
Mean 47 15 7
0
10
20
30
40
50TDS (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 120590190540200190670173797
Max 2345901885402E+950538100797
Mean 177590103540760696238635797
050000
100000150000200000250000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 200120200600500800140714808
Max 4001202446001E+730112280808
Mean 210120123600391513530144808
020000400006000080000
100000120000
FC (MPN/100ml)
- 104 -
1734 MPN/100 ml and 197000 MPN/100 ml during year 2012 and 2009 respectively. FC count
ranges between 200 MPN/100 ml and 109000 MPN/100 ml during year 2005 and 2009 respectively.
7.34.2 River Subarnarekha at Gopiballavpur (West Bengal)
Water Quality of River at Gopiballavpur (West Bengal) is monitored for 2005-13 having 17
Number of observations at the boundary of West Bengal and Odisha.
Summary of observation:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 1 17
Water Quality of River Subarnarekha at Gopiballavpur (West Bengal) during 2005-2013 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 317-321 ):
Figure 317 Figure 318
Figure 319 Figure 320
Figure 321
Close examination of figures 317 to 321 shows that:
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 6.4 8 7.5 7.1 7.15 7.2 6.8 6.4 8
Max 8.5 8 7.8 7.1 7.7 7.85 8.2 8.7 8
Mean 7.5 8 7.7 7.1 7.4 7.5 7.7 7.7 8
0
2
4
6
8
10 DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
Min 0 2 2 3 2 0 3
Max 0 2 2 3 2 0 3
Mean 0 2 2 3 2 0 3
0
1
2
3
4BOD (mg/l)
2005 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 0 2 9 4 9
Max 0 2 9 4 9
Mean 0 2 9 4 9
0
2
4
6
8
10COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 1280011700 1200 7400 13000 2100 6100 306 505
Max 1320011700 2300 7400 62400138005140017340 505
Mean 1300011700 1750 7400 36633 9900 22000 9382 505
0
20000
40000
60000
80000TC (MPN/100ml)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 2400 1300 400 900 7100 1000 1600 1111 202
Max 3200 1300 2000 900 304003200 9600 3468 202
Mean 2800 1300 1200 900 151662467 4700 2593 202
0
10000
20000
30000
40000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 105 -
DO concentration is meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l in each
observation. DO concentration ranges between 6.4 mg/l and 8.7 mg/l during 2005 and
2012 respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 3.0 mg/l during 2005
and 2012 respectively. COD concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 9.0 mg/l during year
2005 and 2012 respectively. TC count ranges between 306 MPN/100 ml and 62400
MPN/100 ml during year 2012 and 2009 respectively. FC count ranges between 202
MPN/100 ml and 30400 MPN/100 ml during year 2013 and 2009 respectively.
7.34.3 River Subarnarekha at Loknath (Odisha)
Water Quality of River at Subarnarekha at Loknath (Odisha) is monitored for 2005-13 having 17
Number of observations at the boundary of West Bengal and Odisha.
Summary of observation:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Observations 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 1 17
Water Quality of River Subarnarekha at Loknath (Odissa) during 2005-2013 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 322-326):
Figure 322 Figure 323
Figure 324 Figure 325
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 6.8 7.2 7.5 7.2 7.2 7.1 8 6.1 8.5
Max 8.2 7.2 8 7.2 7.6 8.9 9.7 9.2 8.5
Mean 7.5 7.2 7.8 7.2 7.4 7.7 8.9 7.7 8.5
0
5
10
15DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
2013
Min 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 2.6
Max 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2.6
Mean 2 0 2 2 1.3 2 2 2.6
0
1
2
3BOD (mg/l)
2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 12 8 3 5
Max 12 8 3 5
Mean 12 8 3 5
0
5
10
15COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 780 143 220 853 379 170 570 510 454
Max 477 143 450 853 443 189 112 780 454
Mean 277 143 335 853 411 131 845 314 454
020000400006000080000
100000TC (MPN/100ml)
- 106 -
Figure 326
Close examination of figures 322 to 326 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.1mg/l and 9.7 mg/l during 2012 and 2011 respectively. BOD
concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 2.6 mg/l during year 2006/2009 and 2013 respectively.
COD concentration ranges between 3 mg/l and 12 mg/l during year 2011 and 2009 respectively. TC
count ranges between 510 MPN/100ml and 85300 MPN/100 ml during year 2012 and 2008
respectively. FC count ranges between 202 MPN/100ml and 6000 MPN/100 ml during year 2013 and
2008 respectively.
7.35 Water Quality of River Cauvery
River Cauvery at Satyagala Bridge, Narsipur (Karnataka)
Water Quality of River Cauvery at Satyagala Bridge, Narsipur (Karnataka) is monitored for 2005-
11 having 08 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Karnataka and Tamilnadu.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Observations 3 2 1 1 1 8
Water Quality of River Cauvery at Satyagala Bridge, Narsipur (Karnataka) during 2005-2011 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 327-329 ):
Figure 327 Figure 328
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Min 350300300600330110500204202
Max 350300400600330320330900202
Mean 350300350600330250190470202
0
2000
4000
6000
8000FC (MPN/100ml)
2005 2008 2010 2011
Min 7.3 6 6.5 6.2
Max 7.5 8.6 6.5 6.2
Mean 7.4 6.3 6.5 6.2
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009
Min 0.3 1 5
Max 1.6 2 5
Mean 0.9 1.3 5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6BOD (mg/l)
- 107 -
Figure 329
Close examination of figure 327 to 329 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.2 mg/l and 8.6 mg/l during year 2011 and 2008 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 5 mg/l during year 2010 and 2009 respectively.
COD ranges between 3.04 mg/l and 61.0 mg/l during year 2010 and 2009.
7.36 Water Quality of River Thenpennai (South Pennar) at Mugalur Bridge, Bangalore
(Karnataka)
Water Quality of River Thenpennai (South Pennar) at Mugalur Bridge, Bangalore (Karnataka) is
monitored for 2005-11 having 11 Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Karnataka
and Tamilnadu.
Summary of Observations:
Year 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Observations 3 2 2 3 1 11
Water Quality of River Thenpennai (South Pennar) at Mugalur Bridge, Bangalore (Karnataka)
during 2005-2011 is depicted in graphs (from figures 330-332 ):
Figure 330 Figure 331
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 3.04 8.5 61 16 16
Max 12 30 61 16 16
Mean 8.9 15.7 61 16 16
0
20
40
60
80COD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 1 2.1 1.8 2.1 5.6
Max 3 2.8 1.8 6 5.6
Mean 1.7 2.5 1.8 3.7 5.6
0
2
4
6
8DO (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 9.6 5.2 2 2 19
Max 33 19 13 15 19
Mean 20.2 12.1 7.5 6.3 19
0
10
20
30
40BOD (mg/l)
- 108 -
Figure 332
Close examination of figures 330 to 332 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 1.0 & 6.0 mg/l during year 2005 & 2010. BOD concentration
ranges between 2 mg/l and 33 mg/l during 2009 & 2005 respectively. COD concentration 24.3 mg/l
and 104 mg/l during 2005 & 2009 respectively.
7.37 Water Quality of River Krishna at Deodurg (Karnataka)
Water Quality of River Krishna at Deodurg (Karnataka) is monitored for 2005-11 having
08Number of observations at the interstate boundary of Karnataka and Tamilnadu.
Summary of Observations:
Year 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Observations 3 2 1 1 1 8
Water Quality of River Krishna at Deodurg (Karnataka) during 2005-2011 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 332-335 ):
Figure 332 Figure 333
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 24.3 32.3 30 30 79
Max 93 63 104 47 79
Mean 66.2 47.7 67 39 79
0
50
100
150COD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 7 7.5 7.9 5.5 7.8
Max 7.3 7.8 7.9 5.5 7.8
Mean 7.2 7.7 7.9 5.5 7.8
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009
Min 0.2 0 1.4
Max 0.2 1.61 1.4
Mean 0.2 0.8 1.4
0
0.5
1
1.5
2BOD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 2 6.4 12 8 16
Max 16 10 12 8 16
Mean 6.8 8.2 12 8 16
0
5
10
15
20COD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009
Min 650 21 90
Max 650 22000 90
Mean 650 11010.5 90
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 109 -
Figure 334 Figure 335
Close examination of figures 332 to 335 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 5.5 mg/l and 7.9 mg/l during year 2010 and 2009 respectively.
BOD ranges between 0 mg/l and 1.6 mg/l during year 2008 only. COD ranges between 2 mg/l and
16 mg/l during year 2005 and 2011respectively. TC ranges between 21MPN/100 ml and 22000
MPN/100 ml during year 2008 only.
7.38 Water Quality of River Tungabhadra at Hochchelli (Karnataka)
Water Quality of River Tungabhadra at Hochchelli (Karnataka)is monitored for 2005-11 having
08 Number of observations at the interstate boundaries of Karnataka and Maharashtra
Summary of observation:
Water Quality of Tungabhadra at River Hochchelli (Karnataka)during 2005-2011 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 336-338 ):
Figure 336 Figure 337
Figure 338
Close examination of figures 336 to 338 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 4.0 mg/l and 12.0 mg/l in year 2010. BOD concentration ranges
between 0 mg/l and 7.4 mg/l during year 2008 and 2010 respectively. COD ranges between 1.5
2005 2008 2010 2011
Min 8 7.3 4 8
Max 9 8.2 12 8
Mean 8.5 7.8 8 8
0
5
10
15DO (mg/l)
2005 2008 2010 2011
Min 1.52 4 10 8
Max 16 12.2 19 8
Mean 9.8 8.1 14.8 8
0
5
10
15
20
COD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2010 2011
Min 1100 13 1600 4800
Max 1100 16100 1600 4800
Mean 1100 8056 1600 4800
0
5000
10000
15000
20000TC (MPN/100 ml)
Year 2005 2008 2010 2011 Total
Observations 3 2 2 1 8
- 110 -
mg/l and 19mg/l during year 2005 and 2010 respectively. TC ranges between 13 MPN/100 ml
and 16100 MPN/100 ml in the year 2008.
7.39 River Bhima at Jewargi, Gangapur, (Karnataka)
Water Quality of River Bhima at Jewargi, Gangapur, (Karnataka) is monitored for 2005-11 having 08
Number of observations at the interstate boundaries of Karnataka and Maharashtra.
Summary of observation:
Year 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Observations 3 2 1 1 1 8
Water Quality of River Bhima at Jewargi, Gangapur, (Karnataka) during 2005-2011 is depicted
in graphs (from figures 339-341 ):
Figure 339 Figure 340
Figure 341
Close examination of figures 339 to 341 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.2 mg/l and 8.0 mg/l in the year 2008. BOD
concentration ranges between 0.5 mg/l and 10 mg/l during year 2005 and 2010
respectively. COD ranges between 1.3 mg/l and 28 mg/l during year 2008 and 2011
respectively.
7.40 Water Quality of River Manjira at Janwada (Karnataka)
Water Quality of River Manjira at Janwada (Karnataka) is monitored for 2005-12 having
05 Number of observations at the interstate boundaries of Karnataka and Maharashtra.
Summary of observation:
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 7.4 6.2 7.2 6.9 7.9
Max 7.5 8 7.2 6.9 7.9
Mean 7.5 7.1 7.2 6.9 7.9
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 0.5 1.6 2 10 6
Max 1 1.6 2 10 6
Mean 0.8 1.6 2 10 6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12BOD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 6.84 1.32 26 19 28
Max 16 11.1 26 19 28
Mean 10.3 6.2 26 19 28
0
5
10
15
20
25
30COD (mg/l)
- 111 -
Year 2005 2008 2010 2012 Total
Observations 1 2 1 1 5
Water Quality of River Manjira at Janwada (Karnataka) during 2005-2012 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 342-344):
Figure 342 Figure 343
Figure 344
Close examination of figures 342 to 344 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.1 mg/l and 6.6 mg/l during year 2010 and 2005 respectively.
COD ranges between 6.0 mg/l and 54.0 mg/l during year 2010 and 2012. TC count ranges between
930 MPN/100ml and 8600 MPN/100 ml during year 2005 and 2012.
7.41 Water Quality of River Godavari at Basra (Kavalguda),Maharashtra
Water Quality of River Godavari at Basra (Kavalguda) is monitored for 2005-12 having 05
Number of observations at the interstate boundaries of Karnataka and Maharashtra.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2008 2010 2012 Total
Observations 1 2 1 1 5
Water Quality of River Godavari at Basra (Kavalguda), Maharashtra during 2005-2012 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 345-348 ):
2005 2008 2010
Min 6.6 6.3 6.1
Max 6.6 6.5 6.1
Mean 6.6 6.4 6.1
5.8
6
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.8DO (mg/l)
2005 2008 2010 2012
Min 14.23 8.2 6 54
Max 14.23 36.2 6 54
Mean 14.23 22.2 6 54
0
10
20
30
40
50
60COD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2012
Min 930 3500 8600
Max 930 3500 8600
Mean 930 3500 8600
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 112 -
Figure 345 Figure 346
Figure 347 Figure 348
Close examination of figures 345 to 348 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 4.0 mg/l and 6.8 mg/l during year 2005 and 2008. COD
concentration ranges between 8.7 mg/l and 31.44 mg/l in the same year 2008. TDS
concentration ranges between 186 mg/l and 1081 mg/l in year 2008. TC count ranges
between 258 MPN/100ml and 5400 MPN/100 ml during year 2005 and 2008 respectively.
7.42 Water Quality of River Uttra-Pinakini (North Pennar) at Hindupur (Andhra Pradesh)
Water Quality of River Uttra-Pinakini (North Pennar) at Hindupur (Andhra Pradesh) is monitored
for 2005-12 having 05 Number of observations at the interstate boundaries of Karnataka and
Andhra Pradesh.
Summary of observations:
Water Quality of River Uttra-Pinakini (North Pennar) at Hindupur (Andhra Pradesh) during 2005-
2010 is depicted in graphs (from figures 349-352 ):
2005 2008 2010
Min 4 5.6 6
Max 4 6.8 6
Mean 4 6.2 6
0
2
4
6
8
DO (mg/l)
2005 2008 2010 2012
Min 16.15 8.7 9 19
Max 16.15 31.44 9 19
Mean 16.15 20.1 9 19
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2008 2010 2012
Min 186 267 316
Max 1081 267 316
Mean 633.5 267 316
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200TDS (mg/l)
2005 2008 2012
Min 258 800 4400
Max 258 5400 4400
Mean 258 3100 4400
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000TC (MPN/100ml)
Year 2005 2008 2009 2010 Total
Observations 1 2 1 1 5
- 113 -
Figure 349 Figure 350
Figure 351 Figure 352
Close examination of figures 349 to 352 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 0.8 mg/l and 5.4 during year 2005 and 2009 respectively. BOD
concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 2 mg/l during year 2010 and 2009 respectively. COD
concentration ranges between 3.85 mg/l and 19 mg/l during year 2008 and 2009 respectively. TDS
concentration ranges between 1223 mg/l and 15552 mg/l during year 2008 and 2009 respectively.
7.43 Water Quality of River Ganga at Tarighat, Gazipur (U. P.)
Water Quality of River Ganga at Tarighat, Gazipur (U. P.) is monitored for 2005-12 having 14
Number of observations at the interstate boundaries of Uttrakhand and Uttar Pradesh.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 1 2 3 2 2 3 1 14
Water Quality of River Ganga at Tarighat, Ghazipur (U. P.) during 2005-2012 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 353-357 ):
2005 2008 2009 2010
Min 0.8 3.9 5.4 3
Max 0.8 4 5.4 3
Mean 0.8 4 5.4 3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6DO (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009
Min 1 1 2
Max 1 1.1 2
Mean 1 1.1 2
00.5
11.5
22.5
BOD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010
Min 9.12 3.85 19 13
Max 9.12 10.9 19 13
Mean 9.12 7.4 19 13
0
5
10
15
20COD (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010
Min 1233 15552 2373
Max 1233 15552 2373
Mean 1233 15552 2373
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
TDS (mg/l)
- 114 -
Figure 353 Figure 354
Figure 355 Figure 356
Figure 357
Close examination of figures 353 to 357 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 4.5 mg/l and 8.8 during year 2009 and 2011 respectively. BOD
concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 6.0 mg/l during year 2005 and 2006 respectively. COD
concentration ranges between 5.6 mg/l and 33.6 during year 2010 and 2011respectively. TC count
ranges between 350 MPN/100 ml and 220000 MPN/100 ml during year 2011 and 2012
respectively. FC count ranges between 240 MPN/100 ml and 110000 MPN/100 ml during year
2011 and 2012 respectively.
7.44.1 Water Quality of River Betwa at Kanjira Bridge , Sagar (M.P.)
Water Quality of River Betwa at Kanjira Bridge, Sagar (M.P.) is monitored for 2005-12 having
15 Number of observations at the interstate boundaries of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 6.93 8.2 5.2 4.5 7.8 7.9 8.1
Max 6.93 8.72 8.8 6.2 8.6 8.8 8.1
Mean 6.93 8.46 7 5.35 8.2 8.35 8.1
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 1 5.2 1 1.9 1.25 2.8 2.4
Max 1 6 4 5 1.9 3.6 2.4
Mean 1 5.6 2.4 3.45 1.575 3.1 2.4
0
2
4
6
8BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 14 17 11 11 5.6 12.8 13.6
Max 14 30 26 26 21.6 33.6 13.6
Mean 14 23.5 18.2 18.5 13.6 21.8 13.6
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
MIN 1E+055000 1400 3000 5000 350 2E+05
Max 1E+051100030002E+0524000920002E+05
Mean 1E+058000 22208150014500364502E+05
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 27000 400 1100 2300 3000 240 110000
Max 27000 700 2300 90000 13000 28000110000
Mean 27000 550 1620 46150 8000 13746110000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 115 -
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 2 1 3 1 4 3 1 15
Water Quality of River Betwa at Kanjira Bridge , Sagar (M.P.) during 2005-2012 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 358-362 ):
Figure 358 Figure 359
Figure 360 Figure 361
Figure 362
Close examination of figures 358 to 362 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 2.8 mg/l and 10.4 mg/l during year 2005 BOD concentration
ranges between 0.76 mg/l and 4.0 mg/l during year 2006 and 2005 respectively. COD concentration
ranges between 5 mg/l and 39.0 mg/l during year 2008 and 2005 respectively. TC count 200
MPN/100 ml and 2100000 MPN/100 ml during year 2008 and 2005. FC count ranges 2 MPN/100
ml and 1100000 MPN/100 ml during 2008 and 2005 respectively.
2005 2006 2008 2010 2011
Min 2.8 8 6 8.7 7.4
Max 10.4 8 6.2 9.2 8.1
Mean 6.6 8 6.1 9 7.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 0.8 0.76 1.1 2 1 1 1
Max 4 0.76 2 2 2.7 2.3 1
Mean 2.4 0.76 1.7 2 1.8 1.7 1
0
1
2
3
4
5BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 36 20 5 7 9 7.4 15.9
Max 39 20 10 7 5 22.2 15.9
Mean 37.5 20 7.3 7 17 14.8 15.9
0
10
20
30
40
50COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 13001400 200 80001300 400 3300
Max 2E+0140030008000130033003300
Mean 1E+0140019348000130016703300
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 80 70 2 5000 7900 200 2300
Max 1E+0 70 2300 5000 7900 2300 2300
Mean 6E+0 70 1034 5000 7900 1160 2300
0200000400000600000800000
10000001200000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 116 -
7.44.2 River Betwa at D/S Dukwan Dam at Babina, Birdha Road, Distt. Lalitpur (U.P.)
Water Quality of River Betwa at D/S Dukwan Dam at Babina, Birdha Road, Distt. Lalitpur (U.P.)
is monitored for 2005-12 having 13 Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Uttar
Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh.
Year 2005 2006 2008 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 2 1 2 4 3 1 13
Water Quality of River Betwa at D/S Dukwan Dam at Babina, Birdha Road, Distt. Lalitpur (U.P.)
2005-2012 is depicted in graphs (from figures 363-367 ):
Figure 363 Figure 364
Figure 365 Figure 366
Figure 367
Close examination of figures 363 to 367 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 5.3 mg/l and 10.8 mg/l during the year 2005 only. BOD
concentration ranges between 0.7 mg/l and 6.0 mg/l during year 2005 only. COD concentration
ranges between 2.6 mg/l and 44.0 mg/l during year 2011 and 2005 respectively. TDS ranges
2005 2006 2008 2010 2011
Min 5.3 5.5 7.47 7.2 7.3
Max 10.8 5.5 8.4 8.4 8.9
Mean 8.05 5.5 7.935 7.8 8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2010 2011 2012
Min 0.7 0.32 1 1 1.1 4.6
Max 6 0.32 2.3 1.6 1.2 4.6
Mean 3.35 0.32 1.65 1.3 1.1 4.6
0
2
4
6
8BOD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2010 2011 2012
Min 29 23 12 9.5 2.6 26.2
Max 44 23 12 13 15.9 26.2
Mean 36.5 23 12 11.2 9.3 26.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
COD (mg/l)
2008 2011 2012
Min 147 111 239
Max 147 200 239
Mean 147 148.6 239
0
100
200
300 TDS (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2010 2011 2012
Min 80 80 8000 79 200 1.7
Max 400 80 8000 7900 790 1.7
Mean 240 80 8000 3990 563.3 1.7
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 117 -
between 111 mg/l and 239 mg/l during year 2011 and 2012 respectively. TC count ranges
between 1.7 MPN/100 ml and 8000 MPN/100 ml during year 2012 and 2008 respectively.
7.45.1 Water Quality of River Sone at Chopan (U.P.)
Water Quality of River Sone at Chopan (U.P.) is monitored for 2005-12 having 15 Numbers of
observations at the interstate boundaries of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh.
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 2 1 3 1 4 3 1 15
Water Quality of River Sone at Chopan (U.P.) during 2005-2012 is depicted in graphs (from
figures 368-373 ):
Figure 368 Figure 369
Figure 370 Figure 371
Figure 372 Figure 373
Close examination of figures 368 to 373 shows that:
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 5.5 0 5.4 7.34 6.9 8.6
Max 5.58 0 5.4 10.2 7.7 8.6
Mean 5.54 0 5.4 8.77 7.4 8.6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 1.46 1.16 1 1 1 1 2
Max 3.3 1.16 2.7 1 3.2 1.8 2
Mean 2.38 1.16 1.6 1 2 1.3 2
0
1
2
3
4BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 15.5813.32 9 5 11 3.9 6.4
Max 18 13.32 44 5 20 38.7 6.4
Mean 16.7913.32 26.5 5 15.5 16.5 6.4
0
10
20
30
40
50COD (mg/l)
2006 2008 2011 2012
Min 151 151 102 103
Max 421 421 212 103
Mean 286 286 157 103
0
100
200
300
400
500TDS (mg/l)
2005
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 23000 8000 3000 7900 170 22000
Max 1E+0522000 3000 280003500022000
Mean 6650015666 3000 179501249022000
020000400006000080000
100000120000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 8000 1700 2300 5000 130 11000
Max 1300013000 2300 170002400011000
Mean 10500 9233 2300 11000 8476 11000
05000
1000015000200002500030000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 118 -
DO concentration ranges between 0 mg/l and 10.2 mg/l during year 2008 and 2010
respectively. BOD concentration ranges 1 mg/l and 3.3 mg/l. COD concentration ranges
between 3.9 mg/l and 44 mg/l during year 2011 and 2008. TDS concentration ranges
between 102 mg/l and 421 mg/l in year 2011 and 2008. TC count ranges between 170
MPN/100 ml and 110000 MPN/100 ml during year 2011 and 2005. FC count ranges
between 130 MPN/100 ml and 17000 MPN/100 ml during year 2011 and 2010
respectively.
7.45.2 River Sone at U/S of Deora before Reservoir, Rihand (U.P.)
Water Quality of River Sone at Chopan (U.P.) is monitored for 2005-12 having 15 Numbers of
observations at the interstate boundaries of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh.
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 2 1 3 1 4 3 1 15
Water Quality of River Sone at U/S of Deora before Reservoir, Rihand (U.P.) during 2005-2012
is depicted in graphs (from figures 374-379 ):
Figure 374 Figure 375
Figure 376 Figure 377
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 5.7 6.4 5.5 8.4 5.8 7.1 8.7
Max 8.3 6.4 7.2 8.4 10.5 8.8 8.7
Mean 7 6.4 6.3 8.4 8.2 7.9 8.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 1 0.5 1 8.4 0.7 1
Max 1.1 0.5 2.5 8.4 2 1
Mean 1.05 0.5 1.5 8.4 1.5 1
0
2
4
6
8
10BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 7 6.1 7 7 16.1 4 5.4
Max 11 6.1 34 7 20 16.8 5.4
Mean 9 6.1 16.3 7 18.7 8.7 5.4
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2008 2011 2012
Min 91 170 192
Max 979 232 192
Mean 535 191 192
0
500
1000
1500TDS (mg/l)
- 119 -
Figure 378 Figure 379
Close examination of figures 374 to 379 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 5.5 mg/l and 10.5 mg/l during year 2008 and 2010 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 0.53 mg/l and 8.4 mg/l during year 2006 and 2009
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 4 mg/l and 34 mg/l. TDS concentration ranges
between 91 mg/l and 979 mg/l respectively in year 2008. Minimum TC count observed is 130
MPN/100 ml in year 2011 whereas maximum TC count observed is 70000 MPN/100 ml in year
2005. Minimum FC count observed is 79 MPN/100 ml in year 2011whereas maximum FC count
observed is 14000 MPN/100 ml in year 2010.
7.46.1 River Ramganga at D/S Sherkot, Kalagarh (U.P.)
Water Quality of River Ramganga at D/S Sherkot, Kalagarh (U.P.) is monitored for 2005-12
having 12 Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Uttar Pradesh and Uttrakhand.
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 12
Water Quality of River Ramganga at D/S Sherkot, Kalagarh (U.P.) during 2005-2012 is depicted
in graphs (from figures 380-384):
Figure 380 Figure 381
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 17000 1300 3000 200 79 7000
Max 30000 3000 3000 14000 13000 7000
Mean 23500 2200 3000 4883 5126.3 7000
0
10000
20000
30000
40000FC (MPN/100 ml)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 7 7.8 8.5 4.4 6.8 8.4 8
Max 7 7.8 8.5 8 7 8.4 8
Mean 7 7.8 8.5 6.2 6.9 8.4 8
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 1.2 2.1 2 1 1.1 2.7
Max 1.4 2.1 2 2 4.9 2.7
Mean 1.3 2.1 2 1.5 3 2.7
0
2
4
6BOD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 22000 2300 5000 400 130 11000
Max 70000 7000 5000 17000 17000 11000
Mean 46000 4766 5000 6060 7376 11000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 120 -
Figure 382 Figure 383
Figure 384
Close examination of figures 380 to 384 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 4.4 mg/l and 8.5 mg/l during year 2009 and 2008. BOD
concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 4.9 mg/l during year 2009 and 2010. COD
concentration ranges between 7 mg/l and 36 mg/l during year 2005 and 2010 respectively. TC
count ranges between 200 MPN/100 ml and 220000 MPN/100 ml during year 2008 and 2012
respectively. FC count ranges between 50 MPN/100 ml and 110000 MPN/100 ml during year 2008
and 2012 respectively.
7.46.2 River Ramganga at D/S Kalagarh, Dam (Uttrankhand)
Water Quality of River Ramganga at D/S Kalagarh, Dam (Uttrankhand) is monitored for 2005-12
having 12 Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Uttar Pradesh and Uttrakhand.
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Observations 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 12
Water Quality of River Ramganga at D/S Kalagarh, Dam (Uttrankhand) during 2005-2012 is
depicted in graphs (from figures 385-390):
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011
Min 7 7 9 8 17 12
Max 9 7 10 8.2 36 12
Mean 8 7 9.5 8.1 26.5 12
010203040
COD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 800 1100 200 840 1700 400 2E+05
Max 80000 1100 3000 840 1E+05 400 2E+05
Mean 40400 1100 1867 840 55850 400 2E+05
050000
100000150000200000250000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 1300 70 50 230 450 200 1E+05
Max 30000 70 1300 230 70000 200 1E+05
Mean 15650 70 683 230 35225 200 1E+05
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 121 -
Figure 385 Figure 386
Figure 387 Figure 388
Figure 389 Figure 390
Close examination of figures 385 to 390 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 6.2 mg/l and 9.2 mg/l during year 2010 and 2011 respectively.
BOD concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 2.6 mg/l during year 2009 and 2010. COD
concentration ranges between 3.0 mg/l and 16.0 mg/l during year 2008 and 2010 respectively. TDS
concentration ranges between 64 mg/l and 436 mg/l during year 2012 and 2010 respectively. TC
count ranges between 40 MPN/100 ml and 160000 MPN/100 ml during year 2006 and 2005
respectively. FC count ranges between 1.8 MPN/100 ml and 28000 MPN/100 ml during year 2011
and 2005 respectively.
7.47 Ganga at Dariganj, Distt. Sonepur, Bihar
Water Quality of River Ganga at Dariganj, Distt. Sonepur, Bihar is monitored for 2005-12 having
10 Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 8 7.58 8.01 8 6.2 9.2 7
Max 8.4 7.58 8.01 8.9 6.9 9.2 7
Mean 8.2 7.58 8 8.5 6.6 9.2 7
0
2
4
6
8
10DO (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 1.2 1.4 2 1 2.6 1
Max 1.6 1.4 2 2.1 2.6 1
Mean 1.4 1.4 2 1.6 2.6 1
00.5
11.5
22.5
3BOD (mg/l)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
Min 5.5 5.2 3 5 7 6.4
Max 9 5.2 13 13 16 6.4
Mean 7.25 5.2 9 9 11.5 6.4
05
101520
COD (mg/l)
2008 2010 2011 2012
Min 158 436 121 64
Max 158 436 121 64
Mean 158 436 121 64
0
100
200
300
400
500
TDS (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 13000 40 1400 4900 400 200 9000
Max 160000 40 30000 4900 17000 200 9000
Mean 86500 40 13133 4900 8700 200 9000
0
50000
100000
150000
200000TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Min 1700 20 400 3000 200 1.8 4600
Max 28000 20 2300 3000 7800 1.8 4600
Mean 14850 20 1166 3000 4000 1.8 4600
0
10000
20000
30000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 122 -
Observations 3 1 2 3 1 10
Water Quality of River Ganga at Dariganj, Distt. Sonepur, Bihar during 2008-2012 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 391-395 ):
Figure 391 Figure 392
Figure 393 Figure 394
Figure 395
Close examination of figures 391 to 395 shows that:
DO concentration is meeting to the minimum prescribed limit of 5.0 mg/l. DO
concentration ranges between 5.81 mg/l and 8.3 mg/l during year 2008 and 2012
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1.7 mg/l and 4.8 mg/l during year 2010
and 2011. COD concentration 8 mg/l and 46.0 mg/l during year 2009 and 2011
respectively. TC count ranges between 170 MPN/100 ml and 220000 MPN/100 ml
respectively. FC count ranges between 110 MPN/100 ml and 110000 MPN/100 ml
respectively.
7.48 Water Quality of River Dhansari
7.48.1 River Dhansari at Ganeshnagar (Nagaland)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 5.81 6 7.8 8.3 8.3
Max 5.81 6 8.7 8.5 8.3
Mean 5.8 6 8.3 8.4 8.3
02468
10
DO (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 2 3 1.7 3.1 1.6
Max 3 3 1.9 4.8 1.6
Mean 2.3 3 1.8 4.1 1.6
0
2
4
6BOD (mg/l)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min 15 8 8.1 19.5 13.4
Max 20 8 27 46 13.4
Mean 17.5 8 17.6 30.8 13.4
0
10
20
30
40
50COD (mg/l)
2008 2010 2011 2012
Min 210 3000 170 220000
Max 35000 7900 54000 220000
Mean 13403 5450 21723.3 220000
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000TC (MPN/100 ml)
2008 2010 2011 2012
Min 110 2300 130 110000
Max 13000 5000 17000 110000
Mean 5370 3650 8343.3 110000
0
50000
100000
150000FC (MPN/100 ml)
- 123 -
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Ganeshnagar (Nagaland) is monitored for 2005-12 having 16
Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Nagaland and Assam.
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 Total
Observations 4 4 3 3 2 16
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Ganeshnagar (Nagaland) during 2005-2010 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 396-400 ):
Figure 396 Figure 397
Figure 398 Figure 399
Figure 400
Close examination of figures 396 to 400 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 0.3 mg/l and 10.0 mg/l during 2005-10. BOD
concentration ranges between 0.7 mg/l and 16.5 mg/l during year 2005 and 2006
respectively. COD concentration ranges between 8mg/l and 82.32 mg/l during year 2009
and 2008 respectively. TDS ranges between 80 mg/l and 125 mg/l during year 2008 and
2009 respectively. TC count ranges between 17 MPN/100 ml and 1600 MPN/100 ml
during year 2006 and 2005 respectively.
4.48.2 River Dhansari at Nagarjan Bridge
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 5.2 0.3 6.4 2.5 6.4
Max 10 10 9.4 10 7.43
Mean 8.1 4.9 7.8 7.3 6.915
0
5
10
15 DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 0.7 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2
Max 2.8 16.5 1.28 2 1.2
Mean 1.5 8.5 1.2 1.6 1.2
0
10
20BOD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010
Min 12 18.2 8 20
Max 12 82.32 18.2 82.32
Mean 12 40.1 13.1 51.16
0
20
40
60
80
100COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 86 118 80 80.5 99
Max 86 118 121 125 121
Mean 86 118 100 98.5 110
0
50
100
150TDS (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009
Min 140 17 38 38
Max 1600 140 38 38
Mean 673 78 38 38
0
500
1000
1500
2000
TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 124 -
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Nagarjan Bridge is monitored for 2005-10 having 16
Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Nagaland and Assam.
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 Total
Observations 4 4 3 3 2 16
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Nagarjan Bridge during 2005-2010 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 401-405 ):
Figure 401 Figure 402
Figure 403 Figure 404
Figure 405
Close examination of figures 401 to 405 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 1.0 mg/l and 10.0 mg/l during year 2006 and 2005
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 0.1 mg/l and 10.2 mg/l in the same year
2006. COD concentration ranges between 7.8 mg/l and 21mg/l during year 2008 and 2005
respectively. TDS concentration ranges between 90 mg/l and 130mg/l during year 2009
and 2008. TC count ranges between 19 MPN/100 ml and 540 MPN/100 in the same year
2005.
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 6.4 1 6.7 3.2 6.7
Max 10 9.2 9.6 9.6 7.4
Mean 7.9 5.1 7.9 6.4 7.1
0
5
10
15DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 0.5 0.1 1.3 2.2 1.3
Max 7 10.2 2.2 5 1.3
Mean 2.45 4.1 1.8 3.6 1.3
0
5
10
15BOD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010
Min 21 7.84 11.5 7.8
Max 21 11.95 18 12
Mean 21 10.4 14.8 9.9
0
5
10
15
20
25COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 94 112 130 90 105
Max 94 112 130 130 126
Mean 94 112 130 112 115.5
0
50
100
150TDS (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009
Min 19 21 20 20
Max 540 340 20 20
Mean 156 180 20 20
0
100
200
300
400
500
600TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 125 -
7.48.3 River Dhansari at Khatkati Gate (Nagaland)
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Khatkati Gate (Nagaland) is monitored for 2005-10 having
16 Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Nagaland and Assam.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 Total
Observations 4 4 3 3 2 16
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Khatkati Gate (Nagaland) during 2005-2010 is depicted in
graphs (from figures 406-410 ):
Figure 406 Figure 407
Figure 408 Figure 409
Figure 410
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 5.8 9 6.9 9 7
Max 8.6 10.5 9.75 10 7.4
Mean 6.96 9.75 8.37 9.12 7.2
0
5
10
15DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 1 0.3 1.2 38 2
Max 12.6 2 2.2 71.5 2
Mean 3.75 1.15 1.5 54.75 2
0
20
40
60
80BOD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010
Min 19 3.92 3.4 4
Max 19 23.9 16 24
Mean 19 15.34 11.58 14
0
10
20
30COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 97 122 80 0.08 118
Max 97 122 132 145 132
Mean 97 122 113 97.02 125
050
100150200
TDS (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009
Min 27 70 38 38
Max 1600 140 105 71
Mean 426 105 71 54
0
500
1000
1500
2000TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 126 -
Close examination of figures 406 to 410 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 5.8 mg/l and 10.5 mg/l during year 2005 and 2006
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 0.3 mg/l and 71.5 mg/l during year
2006 and 2009 respectively. COD concentration ranges between 3.4 mg/l and 24 mg/l
during year 2009 and 2010. TDS ranges between 0.08 mg/l and 145 mg/l. TC count
ranges between 27 MPN/100 and 1600 MPN/100 ml in the year 2005.
7.48.4 River Dhansari at Bokajan (Assam)
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Bokajan (Assam) is monitored for 2005-10 having 16
Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Nagaland and Assam.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 Total
Observations 4 4 3 3 2 16
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Bokajan (Assam) during 2005-2010 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 411-415 ):
Figure 411 Figure 412
Figure 413 Figure 414
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 4.8 8 5.64 3.1 5.6
Max 9 8.8 8.8 9.8 7.8
Mean 7.04 8.4 7.4 7.2 6.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 1.6 2 5 2.8 5.5
Max 4.7 2 5.54 5 5.5
Mean 2.9 2 5.3 3.9 5.5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6BOD (mg/l)
2005 2008 2009 2010
Min 24 6.7 16 20
Max 24 35.28 16 35
Mean 24 20.6 16 27.5
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 115 118 108 0.14 108
Max 115 118 150 20 138
Mean 115 118 132 10.1 123
0
50
100
150
200TDS (mg/l)
- 127 -
Figure 415
Close examination of figures 411 to 415 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between is 3.1 mg/l and 9.8 mg/l during 2005 and 2009
respectively. BOD concentration ranges between 1.6 mg/l and 5.5 mg/l during 2005 and
2010 respectively. COD concentration ranges between 6.7 mg/l and 35.28 mg/l
respectively in the year 2008. TDS concentration ranges between 0.14mg/l and 150 mg/l
during year 2009 and 2008 respectively. TC count ranges between 17 MPN/100 and 3500
MPN/100 ml in the year 2005.
7.48.5 River Dhansari at Numaligarh (Assam)
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Numaligarh (Assam) is monitored for 2005-10 having 16
Numbers of observations at the interstate boundaries of Nagaland and Assam.
Summary of observations:
Year 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 Total
Observations 4 4 3 3 2 16
Water Quality of River Dhansari at Numaligarh (Assam) during 2005-2010 is depicted in graphs
(from figures 416-420 ):
Figure 416 Figure 417
2005 2006 2008 2009
Min 17 17 23 23
Max 350 34 23 23
Mean 196.75 25.5 23 23
0
100
200
300
400TC (MPN/100 ml)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 5.6 0.6 7.03 3.4 7
Max 9.5 8.8 9.4 15.4 7.8
Mean 7.9 5.4 8.07 9.2 7.4
0
5
10
15
20DO (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 1.2 0.6 1.2 2.1 4.4
Max 2.5 1.7 4.4 2.2 4.4
Mean 2.03 1.15 2.8 2.15 4.4
0
1
2
3
4
5BOD (mg/l)
- 128 -
Figure 418 Figure 419
Figure 420
Close examination of figures 416 to 420 shows that:
DO concentration ranges between 0.6 mg/l and 15.4 mg/l during year 2006 and 2009.
BOD concentration ranges 0.6 mg/l and 4.4 mg/l during year 2006 and 2010. COD
concentrations ranges between 12 mg/l and 31 mg/l during the year 2009. TDS
concentration ranges between 51 mg/l and 103 mg/l during year 2009 and 2010
respectively. TC count ranges between 17 MPN/100 and 220 MPN/100 ml in the year
2006.
2005 2008 2009 2010
Min 17 18.2 12 20
Max 17 27.44 31 27.4
Mean 17 21.8 21.5 23.7
0
10
20
30
40COD (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
Min 76 74 80 51 99
Max 76 74 103 100 103
Mean 76 74 91.5 60.03 101
0
50
100
150TDS (mg/l)
2005 2006 2008 2009
Min 34 17 38 38
Max 110 220 38 38
Mean 77 118 38 38
0
50
100
150
200
250TC (MPN/100 ml)
- 129 -
CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSION
In this report, the rivers with polluted and poor water quality are differentiated out on the basis of
the six water quality parameters i.e. DO, BOD, COD, TDS, TC, FC. Out of the total 40 rivers
spread over 82 locations being monitored by Zonal Offices and Head offices, 16 rivers are
estimated out to be polluted.
River Dhela at Adampur Village, Bhojpur is observed with the highest BOD value among all the
polluted river locations i.e. 131 mg/l in 2012 with very high TC and FC count.
The most polluted river is Ghaggar having the lowest water quality at the 7 locations out of the 9
locations namely, (i) Ghaggar (i) at Mubarakpur (Punjab), (ii) at Tiwana village (Punjab), (iii) at
Sirsa Dabwali Road (Haryana), (iv) at Chandrapur Siphon (Haryana), (v) at Sirdulgarh (Punjab),
(vi) at Ottu Weir (Haryana) (vii) at Sirsa Hanumangarh Road (Rajasthan). Ghaggar at Mubarakpur
(Punjab) is having the deteriorated water quality due the highest BOD range among all the polluted
Ghaggar river locations. Ghaggar at Sirsa Dabwali road is observed with the highest TDS value
among the 7 polluted river locations. Ghaggar at Chandrapur, Siphon is observed with the highest
TC count.
Among the 09 locations of river Yamuna, 3 locations are observed having deteriorated water
quality viz. (i)Yamuna at Mohena Palwal Road (Haryana), (ii) River Yamuna at Asgarpur village,
(U.P.) and (iii)River Yamuna at Hasanpur, Mohali (Haryana). Yamuna at the location Asgarpur
village is observed with the most deteriorated water quality having the highest BOD concentration,
remaining two locations are also observed with high TC and FC count and having BOD
concentration exceeding to the prescribed limit.
River Ganga being monitored at the four locations and the river Dhansari at 5 locations shows water
quality meeting to prescribed standards with respect to BOD and DO conentration. The rivers being
monitored at different locations and having good water quality at every location are Beas, Sarsa,
Vardha, Mahi, Chambal, Betwa, Sone, Tapi, Bhima, Krishna, Damodar, Ramganga and
Subarnrekha.
The other rivers being monitored under IRBM network and not meeting t prescribed standards with
respect to BOD and DO are River Bahela at Badli Village, Tehseel - Tanda (U.P.), River
Damanganga at at Jarry Causeway D/S of CETP discharge (Gujarat), River Churni at Bijoypur
(West Bengal), River Thenpennai at Mugalur Bridge, Bangalore (Karnataka) and River Markanda
at Narayangarh (Haryana).
The rivers being monitored at single location and having water quality meeting to the prescribed
standards are Satluj, Kosi, Kitcha, Swan, Pilakhar, Churni, Indravati, Cauvery, Tungabhadra,
Pennar, Godavari, Mahanadi, Godavari, Wainganga, Sabarmati and Uttra Pinkhani.
Overall, 78% locations have DO value within the prescribed limit and 75% locations have BOD
value within the prescribed range with 6% locations have very high BOD value indicating poor
water quality. 76% locations have TDS range and 11% with TC range within the prescribed limit.
- 130 -
CHAPTER 9 : ACTION TAKEN BY CPCB TO IMPROVE WATER
QUALITY
In order to resolve the interstate water quality problems and keep watch on water
quality at interstate borders of different rivers, in 51st Chairman & Member
Secretaries conference, it was decided that CPCB would monitor the water quality
of the rivers at interstate borders.
As a follow-up of the decision, CPCB through its Zonal Offices and Head Office initiated
monitoring of all the important rivers at interstate borders. The monitoring being carried
out 4 times in a year following CPCB’s guidelines & protocol notified by Ministry
of Environment, Forests and Climate Change(MoEFCC). Following significant actions
have been taken by CPCB to prevent water pollution in the rivers:
1. Action taken in the matter of Inter-State problem of rivers in Northern States
As a follow up the decision taken in 54th
Chairmen and Member Secretaries conference,
CPCB organized a meeting with concerned SPCBs/PCCs of Northern/ Eastern & North-
Eastern states to discuss the issue of interstate water pollution problem in detail and
compliance status of various polluting sources on 24, September, 2008 at MoEF, Delhi.
Regarding contribution of pollution from domestic sources, Haryana SPCB were
requested to issue notice either to municipal authorities or PHED to put up proper
sewage treatment plants to take care of all the significant sewage outfalls.
Punjab SPCB were requested to pursue the distilleries to achieve “Zero-discharge”
limit, Since the Patiala Distillery and Chandigarh Distillery are major source of
pollution of Ghaggar River in the territory of Punjab.
Regarding contribution of pollution from domestic sources municipal authorities or
PHED were communicated to put up proper sewage treatment plants to take care of all
the significant sewage outfalls.
It was decided to inform Delhi Jal Board to take sample whenever they found any
abnormal condition in water quality of Yamuna River with intimation to CPCB and
HSPCB.
Untreated/partially treated discharge of effluents from Uttrakhand is polluting River
Kosi & Ramganga and their tributaries like Bahela, Dehla. The pollution is so severe
that it continues till Allahabad and cause colour in the river at Sangam. Monitoring
being carried out on daily basis for river Dhela, river Kosi, river Bhela, river Gagan
and river Ram Ganga by CPCB with co-ordination of SPCBs of Uttarakhand and U.P.
in their respective monitoring locations.
- 131 -
2. Action taken in the matter of Inter-State problem of rivers in Eastern and North-
Eastern States :
As a follow up the decision taken in 54th
Chairmen and Member Secretaries
conference, CPCB organized a meeting with concerned SPCBs/PCCs of Northern/
Eastern & North-Eastern states to discuss the issue of interstate water pollution
problem in detail and compliance status of various polluting sources on 25,
September, 2008 at MoEF, Delhi.
The major pollution of Ganga at Bihar border is due to discharge of sewage from
Varanasi and Ghazipur. UPPCB informed that STPs are being augmented at
Varanasi under Ganga Action Plan-II. CPCB requested that UPPCB to ensure full
utilization of STP capacity.
Regarding pollution from Singrauli area, UPPCB informed that the thermal power
plants under NTPC and UPEB are being pursued to provide adequate control
measures. CPCB requested UPPCB to regularly monitor the performance of the
control measures adopted.
Realizing the gravity of the problem, it was decided to monitored all the locations
at least once in a year monitored even those rivers which are either small/seasonal
or not causing any Interstate dispute.
The concerned SPCBs have been requested to take remedial measures to restore
water quality of the identified polluted river at interstate border.
3. Action taken in the matter of River Yamuna :
Episodes on water quality degradation at Wazirabad were informed by Delhi Jal
Board on several occasions since 2006. Similar episodes occurred in October and
November, 2006 and Central Pollution Control Board has issue direction to
Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB) u/s 18 1 (b) of Water (Prevention
and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 during 2006. Chairman, CPCB also wrote a
DO letter to the Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary to Govt. of
Haryana who was also In-charge of Environment & Forests Department of
Government of Haryana during 2006.
CPCB again issued direction to Haryana State Pollution Control Board u/s 18 1 (b)
of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 on November 15, 2007
for taking immediate effective steps to contain pollution of the River Yamuna..
CPCB again issued direction to Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, State Pollution Control
Board (SPCB) and Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) u/s 18 1 (b) of
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 on 23/11/2007.
CPCB made an exhaustive survey report on Polluting Sources of Yamuna river
Upstream Wazirabad.
A meeting was held on 29/06/2009 at CPCB, Head office on water quality
problems of Yamuna river with Delhi Jal Board, Delhi Pollution Control
Committee (DPCC), Uttar Pardesh SPCB, Haryana SPCB, UP Jal Nigam, Nagar
Nigam Ghaziabad to contain pollution at the respective sources of the River
Stretch of Yamuna.
- 132 -
A meeting was held on 10/11/2009 in CPCB on issues of water quality of Yamuna
River in Delhi Stretch.
A meeting was held on 31/12/09 at CPCB to review the status of sewage treatment
in Delhi & water Quality Problems in Delhi stretch of Yamuna River.
DJB regularly complaint about increase in Ammonia and chloride level at river
Yamuna upstream Wazirabad, Delhi.
CPCB also monitor Sewage Treatment plant installed along the catchment of river
Yamuna.
CPCB also monitoring the status of drain joining river Yamuna.
A review meeting on “Interstate Water Pollution Problem in Southern and Western
States” was held on 18/07/08 at MoEF.
Action Taken in the matter of River Ghaggar :
Pursuant to the decisions taken in the meeting held on August 19, 2009 chaired by the
Secretary, Cabinet Coordination, Rashtrapati Bhawan, New Delhi and
communication received from the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and
Forests (MoEF), Shri Rajiv Guaba vide letter no. M-12012/1/2002-NRCD-II (pt)
dated 24/08/2009, a detailed field investigation on the aforesaid issued was conducted
by CPCB. A detailed report on “Pollution Status of River Ghaggar” was compiled
and submitted to MoEF on 14/12/2009.
On the basis of report, MoEF requested CPCB to issue directions to the defaulter
industries in order to address the problem of pollution load entering Jharmal Choe
and other area vide DO. NO M-12012/1/2002-NRCD-II (pt) dated 12th February,
2010.
CPCB issued direction to the Punjab, Haryana & Himachal Pradesh State Pollution
Control Boards & Chandigarh PCC under section 18 (1)( b) of the water (PCP) Act
1974 in the matter of industrial effluent and sewage discharge into Ghaggar River
vide letter no. A-19014/41/2001-mon/509-11 dated 15th April, 2010.
Since, No reply was received therefore, CPCB issued reminder letter to the Punjab,
Haryana & Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Boards & Chandigarh PCC on
the same issues vide letter no. A-19014/41/2001-Mon/6719-6722 dated 17th August,
2010.
Chandhigarh PCC (CPCC) has given show cause notice to the Municipal
Corporation, Chandigarh and Superintending Engineer, Chandigarh Administration:
to ensure treatment of sewage to the prescribed norms with immediate effect.
to ensure that STP run on optimal capacity.
Municipal Corporation was directed to lay down pipeline to carry sewage water of
Chandigarh directly to STP Raipur Kalan.
CPCB regularly submitting analysis report of the sewage treatment plants installed in
Chandigarh.
A meeting was held on 28/03/2011 at house of Hon’ble Chief Minister of Delhi to
review the Water Quality Problem of River. Yamuna. Yamuna. Brief report on
Yamuna river (Hathnikund to Okhla Barrage) is also prepared.
CPCB recently conducted a survey of river Yamuna from Hathnikund to Agra to
assess the water quality of river Yamuna.
- 133 -
CHAPTER10: RECOMMENDATIONS
The river pollution control needs consideration of the following aspects for clean-up:
Industries should install the machineries to remove contaminants from their effluents and
wastewater by installing Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) , untreated effluent discharge
into rivers should not be allowed and Immediate closure of all the unauthorized activities
which discharge industrial effluents, sludge and chemicals.
The cities and towns should also have facilities to clean sewage effluent. All towns and
cities should have Sewage Treatment Plant to treat the sewage.
Religious practices/activities which pollute river water. Idols should be made from natural
materials as described in the holy scripts. It would be appropriate to use traditional clay
for idol making rather than baked clay. Use of painted idols should be discouraged.
In case painted idols are used, water soluble and non-toxic natural dyes may be used. Use
of toxic and non- degradable chemical dyes should be strictly prohibited.
Natural colors used in food products and permitted in Pharmaceuticals may be preferred.
Proposals for creation of treatment capacity must be based and prioritized with reference
to the estimated sewage generation in the relevant catchment areas which should be
estimated after taking all factors into account including population trends and
availability/supply of water.
Systems and procedures need to be strengthened to ensure accurate measurement of both
the quantity of treated sewage being discharged as well as its quality with reference to the
prescribed parameters.
Promoting communities participation in local river cleaning up
Organizing awareness programs and meetings on the river pollution and its threats.
Provide proper garbage collection system on both banks of the river, so that garbage is not
dumped in the river.
To improve flow pattern, it will improve its carrying capacity.