Upload
nitsa
View
24
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Water Board Certified Regulatory Program CEQA Training for Basin Planning and TMDLs. April 2008. http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/academy. Introduction to CEQA for Certified Regulatory Programs. Terry Rivasplata, Jones & Stokes Steven Blum, OCC. Why Are We Here?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
11
Water BoardWater BoardCertified Regulatory Program Certified Regulatory Program
CEQA Training CEQA Training forfor
Basin Planning and TMDLsBasin Planning and TMDLs
April 2008April 2008
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/academy
22
Introduction Introduction to CEQA for Certified to CEQA for Certified Regulatory ProgramsRegulatory Programs
Terry Rivasplata, Jones & StokesTerry Rivasplata, Jones & Stokes
Steven Blum, OCCSteven Blum, OCC
33
Why Are We Here? Why Are We Here?
To understand the rationale behind CEQA well To understand the rationale behind CEQA well enough to manage a CEQA process well and enough to manage a CEQA process well and prepare excellent CEQA documentationprepare excellent CEQA documentation
To understand the differences between “normal” To understand the differences between “normal” CEQA and CEQA for Certified Regulatory CEQA and CEQA for Certified Regulatory Programs (and they’re not as big as you think)Programs (and they’re not as big as you think)
To prepare staff to do an excellent job of To prepare staff to do an excellent job of developing CEQA analyses in the futuredeveloping CEQA analyses in the future
44
What is CEQA?What is CEQA?
A process designed to reveal potential A process designed to reveal potential environmental impacts of a project environmental impacts of a project
A vehicle that empowers citizens to A vehicle that empowers citizens to influence environmental decision-makinginfluence environmental decision-making
A A processprocess not a not a permitpermit
A legal requirement that can ensureA legal requirement that can ensure
Real public participationReal public participation
Mitigation of adverse impacts, whenever Mitigation of adverse impacts, whenever feasible feasible
55
Who Must Comply with CEQA?Who Must Comply with CEQA?
CEQA requirements apply to California CEQA requirements apply to California public agencies (state and local)public agencies (state and local)
Projects proposed by private entities Projects proposed by private entities come under CEQA when state or local come under CEQA when state or local permits are requiredpermits are required
66
How CEQA Works How CEQA Works
““CEQA is intended to be interpreted in a CEQA is intended to be interpreted in a manner that affords the fullest possible manner that affords the fullest possible protection of the environment” protection of the environment” ((Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsFriends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors 8 Cal.3d 247) 8 Cal.3d 247)
Relies on strict adherence to process Relies on strict adherence to process as a way to ensure public participationas a way to ensure public participationin government decision makingin government decision making
77
How CEQA WorksHow CEQA Works
Environmental analysis must include: Environmental analysis must include: A description of projectA description of project
Potential significant impactsPotential significant impacts
Review of mitigation and alternatives that Review of mitigation and alternatives that will avoid impactswill avoid impacts
Review of cumulative impactsReview of cumulative impacts
All environmental documents are subject All environmental documents are subject to both to both publicpublic and and public agencypublic agency review review and comment and comment
88
Finding CEQA Finding CEQA
CEQA statute: Public Resources Code CEQA statute: Public Resources Code §21000 et seq. (California Environmental §21000 et seq. (California Environmental Quality Act) Quality Act)
CEQA Guidelines: 14 CCR §15000 et seq. CEQA Guidelines: 14 CCR §15000 et seq.
SWRCB implementation regulations: SWRCB implementation regulations: 23 CCR §3720 et seq. 23 CCR §3720 et seq.
Updated statute, guidelines, caselaw, Updated statute, guidelines, caselaw, other info: other info: http://http://www.ceres.ca.gov/ceqawww.ceres.ca.gov/ceqa
99
What is a “Project?”What is a “Project?”
The “whole of an action” that may cause either The “whole of an action” that may cause either
A A direct physical changedirect physical change in the environment in the environment
A reasonably foreseeable A reasonably foreseeable indirect physical indirect physical changechange in the environment in the environment
Public agency issuance of a grant, loan, or Public agency issuance of a grant, loan, or other financing of a projectother financing of a project
Categorical exemption for studies (Guidelines Categorical exemption for studies (Guidelines §§15306)15306)
Guidelines §15378
1010
What is a “Project?”What is a “Project?”
Adoption of a plan or policy that may Adoption of a plan or policy that may result in a significant environmental impact result in a significant environmental impact
Issuance of a permit, license, or entitlementIssuance of a permit, license, or entitlement
NPDES permits are exempt from CEQANPDES permits are exempt from CEQA
Guidelines §15378
1111
What are Significant Impacts? What are Significant Impacts?
A “significant impact” causes a A “significant impact” causes a substantialsubstantial or or potentially substantialpotentially substantial adverse change in adverse change in physical conditions in the project area physical conditions in the project area
Environmental review must consider: Environmental review must consider:
Direct impacts Direct impacts
Reasonably foreseeable indirect impactsReasonably foreseeable indirect impacts
Impacts to the environment including impacts Impacts to the environment including impacts notnot regulated by the lead agency regulated by the lead agency
Guidelines §15382
1212
Levels of AnalysisLevels of Analysis
If the project has no potential for If the project has no potential for significant adverse impacts: significant adverse impacts: Negative DeclarationNegative Declaration
If significant impacts can be mitigated to If significant impacts can be mitigated to insignificance: insignificance: Mitigated Negative DeclarationMitigated Negative Declaration
If potential remains for significant impacts: If potential remains for significant impacts: Environmental Impact ReportEnvironmental Impact Report
1313
Certified Regulatory Programs Certified Regulatory Programs
Agency programs designed to protect the Agency programs designed to protect the environment and ensure public participationenvironment and ensure public participation
Certified by Secretary of the Resources AgencyCertified by Secretary of the Resources Agency
Exempt from document formatting requirements Exempt from document formatting requirements of standard CEQA process (similar content)of standard CEQA process (similar content)
Examples: Examples:
• Basin Planning and policies including TMDLs (Water Boards) Basin Planning and policies including TMDLs (Water Boards)
• Timber Harvest Plans (Dept of Forestry and Fire Protection) Timber Harvest Plans (Dept of Forestry and Fire Protection)
• Coastal Development Permits (California Coastal Commission) Coastal Development Permits (California Coastal Commission)
1414
Case Law Defining SEDs Case Law Defining SEDs
Since certification of the Basin Plan Since certification of the Basin Plan program, our work has become more program, our work has become more controversial and subject to litigation controversial and subject to litigation
Case law has been defining and refining Case law has been defining and refining requirements for SEDrequirements for SED Required elementsRequired elements
Level of detailLevel of detail
Organization of SEDOrganization of SED
151515
Case Law – Lessons Learned Case Law – Lessons Learned
L.A. River Trash TMDL – City of L.A. River Trash TMDL – City of Arcadia Arcadia
Deer Creek Temperature – California Deer Creek Temperature – California Sport Fishing AllianceSport Fishing Alliance
L.A. River Metals TMDL – Alternatives L.A. River Metals TMDL – Alternatives Analysis CaseAnalysis Case
Others…Others…
1616
Certified Regulatory ProgramsCertified Regulatory Programs
Subject to most “normal” CEQA Subject to most “normal” CEQA requirementsrequirements
Cross-agency consultation Cross-agency consultation
Public disclosure and reviewPublic disclosure and review
Notice, scoping, reasonable range of Notice, scoping, reasonable range of compliance methods, alternatives analysis, compliance methods, alternatives analysis, mitigation, cumulative impacts analysis, mitigation, cumulative impacts analysis, findings (resolution)findings (resolution)
1717
CRP Requirements CRP Requirements
Project documents constitute “substitute Project documents constitute “substitute environmental documentation” (SED)environmental documentation” (SED) Basin Plan amendmentBasin Plan amendment
Supporting Staff ReportSupporting Staff Report
Checklist/environmental analysisChecklist/environmental analysis
CommentsComments
ResponsesResponses
Resolution Resolution
1818
SED Levels of AnalysisSED Levels of Analysis
Neg Dec-level Neg Dec-level SEDSED
Mitigated Mitigated Neg Dec-level Neg Dec-level SEDSED
EIR-level SEDEIR-level SED
1919
Environmental AnalysisEnvironmental Analysis
Meets CEQA objectives: Meets CEQA objectives:
Considers potential impactsConsiders potential impacts
Considers range of compliance methods Considers range of compliance methods
Evaluates mitigation, alternatives to the Evaluates mitigation, alternatives to the project, cumulative Impactsproject, cumulative Impacts
2020
CRP Process CRP Process
Basin Plan amendments under the CRP Basin Plan amendments under the CRP follow the public process for Basin follow the public process for Basin PlanningPlanning
Noticing and public review periodsNoticing and public review periods
SED elements and organizationSED elements and organization
Follow Water Board CEQA regulations Follow Water Board CEQA regulations (currently under revision)(currently under revision)
State Board SED process satisfies the State Board SED process satisfies the CEQA procedural requirements as wellCEQA procedural requirements as well
2121
Questions?Questions?
2222
Basin Planning Basin Planning OverviewOverview
Rik L. RasmussenRik L. Rasmussen
Senior Environmental ScientistSenior Environmental Scientist
Chief, Planning, Standards, and Chief, Planning, Standards, and Implementation UnitImplementation Unit
2323
TMDLs and Basin Plan TMDLs and Basin Plan AmendmentsAmendments
CWA §303(d)(2) & §303(e) CWA §303(d)(2) & §303(e) EPA Approved TMDLs must be incorporated into EPA Approved TMDLs must be incorporated into
State Water Quality Management planState Water Quality Management plan
Should be incorporated during Continuous Planning Should be incorporated during Continuous Planning ProcessProcess
CWA §303(c)CWA §303(c) Changes to Water Quality StandardsChanges to Water Quality Standards
• ObjectivesObjectives
• Beneficial UsesBeneficial Uses
• NPDES Compliance Schedule ProvisionsNPDES Compliance Schedule Provisions
2424
TMDLs and Basin Plan TMDLs and Basin Plan Amendments Amendments (cont’d)(cont’d)
Porter-Cologne Porter-Cologne
§13242 requires Program of Implementation §13242 requires Program of Implementation for Water Quality Objectivesfor Water Quality Objectives
Administrative Procedures ActAdministrative Procedures Act
““Rule of General Applicability”Rule of General Applicability”
Serial Actions Serial Actions
• Implementation will take multiple actions of the Implementation will take multiple actions of the Water BoardWater Board
2525
2626
Overlapping Legal Requirements?Overlapping Legal Requirements? Notice Notice
Porter-ColognePorter-Cologne Government CodeGovernment Code
• §6061 Publication for one day in a Newspaper§6061 Publication for one day in a Newspaper
• §6061.3 Publication for 3 days for Prohibitions§6061.3 Publication for 3 days for Prohibitions
CEQACEQA 45 Day for “Notice of Filing” (23 CCR §3777)45 Day for “Notice of Filing” (23 CCR §3777)
Clean Water ActClean Water Act 45 Day Notice (33 US Code §1251 et. Seq.)45 Day Notice (33 US Code §1251 et. Seq.)
Administrative Procedures ActAdministrative Procedures Act CWA Public Participation (Gov.’t Code §11353(b) (4))CWA Public Participation (Gov.’t Code §11353(b) (4))
2727
Overlapping Legal Requirements?Overlapping Legal Requirements?EconomicsEconomics
Porter-ColognePorter-Cologne When adopting new or revised water qualtiy When adopting new or revised water qualtiy
objectives objectives
• must “consider economics” (CWC §13241)must “consider economics” (CWC §13241)
When adopting an agricultural water quality When adopting an agricultural water quality control plan (CWC § 13141)control plan (CWC § 13141)
• Estimate total costs of programEstimate total costs of program
• Identify potential funding sourcesIdentify potential funding sources
2828
Overlapping Legal Requirements?Overlapping Legal Requirements?Economics Economics (Cont’d)(Cont’d)
CEQA §21159 :CEQA §21159 :
Adoption of a rule or regulation requiring the Adoption of a rule or regulation requiring the installation of pollution control equipment, or a installation of pollution control equipment, or a performance standard or treatment performance standard or treatment requirement requirement
2929
Response to CommentsResponse to Comments
Peer review Peer review (Health and Safety Code (Health and Safety Code §§57004)57004)
Written response in recordWritten response in record
Public comments Public comments (23 CCR (23 CCR §§3779; 40 CFR Part 25; 3779; 40 CFR Part 25; Administrative Procedures Act)Administrative Procedures Act)
Written response available at hearingWritten response available at hearing
Oral responseOral response
CEQA commentsCEQA comments
Late commentsLate comments
Summary of oral comments?Summary of oral comments?
3030
Hearing RequirementsHearing Requirements Porter-ColognePorter-Cologne
§13244 (Regional Board), §13245 (State Board)§13244 (Regional Board), §13245 (State Board)
CEQACEQA Requires Agencies to develop CEQA proceduresRequires Agencies to develop CEQA procedures
Procedures must be consistent with all CEQA Procedures must be consistent with all CEQA requirements requirements (Joy Road Area Forest and Watershed Association v. (Joy Road Area Forest and Watershed Association v. CDF, 142 Cal.App.4th 656) CDF, 142 Cal.App.4th 656)
Clean Water ActClean Water Act Comply with public participation requirementsComply with public participation requirements
Administrative Procedures ActAdministrative Procedures Act Defers to Porter-Cologne and CWADefers to Porter-Cologne and CWA
3131
3232
State Board State Board LiaisonsLiaisons
Joanna Jensen – Joanna Jensen – Regions 2 and 6Regions 2 and 6
Michael Buckman – Michael Buckman – Regions 3, 7, & 4*Regions 3, 7, & 4*
Nirmal Sandhar – Nirmal Sandhar – Regions 9 & 8Regions 9 & 8
Mitchell Goode – Mitchell Goode – Regions 1 & 5Regions 1 & 5
Nicholas Martorano – Nicholas Martorano – Regions 4 & 5*Regions 4 & 5*
* * BackupBackup
Water Quality Standards Water Quality Standards ContactsContacts
Stephanie Rose – Stephanie Rose – Freshwater Bacteria Freshwater Bacteria
Tom Kimball – Tom Kimball – Methylmercury Fish Methylmercury Fish Tissue Objectives, Tissue Objectives, SeleniumSelenium
Steve Camacho – Steve Camacho – Cadmium and Nutrients.Cadmium and Nutrients.
David Edwards – David Edwards – Chlorine Policy, Toxicity Chlorine Policy, Toxicity Control Provisions (SIP)Control Provisions (SIP)
3333
Questions?Questions?