WatchTech - New Developments in Timepiece Reg … · 2018-10-23 · New Developments in Timepiece Regulators – SSC Study Day 2014 Date: Oct 22, 2014,00:10 AM - (view entire thread)

By: DonCorson [AHCI Moderator] | PM

Posts: 2850 PICTURE CENTER

Residence: HomePage:New

TweetTweet 0

Not logged in | Login | Create AccountMy: |

>> Start NEW message thread | Forum Search

WATCHTECH: myView | List All | Most Recent New : (posts) * | FAV | Gallery

WatchTech Forum | Gallery | Blog Stories | Editor's Picks | All ForumsAdjust Font Size: >> - | +

New Developments in Timepiece Regulators – SSCStudy Day 2014Date: Oct 22, 2014,00:10 AM - (view entire thread)

New Developments in Timepiece Regulators – SSC Study Day

2014

The Société Suisse de Chronométrie (SSC), hosted a study day in

September dedicated to the “Vectors of Innovation in Watchmaking –

Materials, Design and Calculation” The conference was held at the new SwissTech Convention

Center on the campus of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL).

There were many presentations including subjects such as developments in colored ceramic

materials, the characterisation of the elastic properties and deformation of the nickel-phosphor

materials used in the LIGA process, measurements of acoustic elements (read; repetition gong) using

a Doppler laser, etc..

For me, the two most interesting presentations had to do with new implementations of the regulating

organ of mechanical watches, the Genequand regulator and the IsoSpring regulator. The

Genequand regulator is an implementation of John Harrison’s grasshopper escapement for clocks

(1730) using flexible elements instead of pivots. This escapement is combined with a new pivotless

oscillator with very high quality factor, greatly increasing the autonomy. It is also entirely implemented

in silicon.

The following report presents my own explanation of the presentation of the IsoSpring regulator by

Professor Simon Henein [1]. This regulator is based on a different concept than the oscillator

systems used as the time base for today’s watches and pendulum clocks. This regulator has been

dubbed "IsoSpring", but I would prefer to call it "Orbital", as it is based on the physics of celestial

movement, the orbits of the planets as described by Kepler and proven by Newton. These concepts

lead to an orbital regulator that does not require an escapement. It does not chop the time into short

periods, ticks, but produces a continuous controlled movement.

Professor Henein started the presentation with a quick, but in depth, history of modern escapements,

mechanisms that is used in all mechanical clocks and watches made today. We remember that one

of the main requirements for a precise, practically usable time base is that its oscillating frequency be

independent of the amplitude of oscillation. This property, known as isochronism, makes the

timekeeping independent of the fluctuations of the energy source. The isochronism principle was

discovered by Galileo and implemented first by Christiaan Huygens, in 1656 for clocks with the

pendulum and in 1675 with the balance-hairspring (in parallel with Hooke) for watches. With these

improvements the accuracy of clocks went from an error of 15 minutes a day to about 15 seconds a

day, a tremendous improvement of almost two orders of magnitude.

Subsequent advances were less spectacular, the chronometer escapement bettering the

timekeeping, the Swiss anchor escapement and certainly the introduction of draw on the anchor

bettering the reliability. From that time (1800) to now the advances have been small and incremental,

many tiny improvements that all together have lead to the level of timekeeping and reliability that we

see today. But these regulators are all based on simple oscillation, the movement of a mass with a

restoring force, be it gravity in the case of a pendulum or a spring in the case of a balance wheel.

That balancee wheel must continually stop and change direction.

The novelty of the IsoSpring orbital regulator is that it is based on the orbits of the planets around the

sun, yielding unstopped rotation. The basic concept goes back to 1687 when Isaac Newton

published the Principia Mathematica. His most famous result was to show that the celestial

movements could be explained by a few simple principals and to prove the laws of Kepler governing

the elliptical orbits of the planets around the sun, the sun being at one of the focus points of the

ellipse.

SITE: WatchTech

>> WATCHTECH - MASTHEAD

>> NEW START PAGE New

>> FORUM - Original View>> FORUM - Most Recent Threads>> BLOG>> GALLERY

>> Previous Home Page old

>>> See all watchtech Pinterest Pins New

Follow PuristSPro on Twitter

->See All Twitter Links

->Subscribe to our RSS feeds

WatchTech

BRANDS >> FRONT PAGE HOrologicalMEandering Basel/SIHH 14 News Central PuristSProTV Photography Basel/SIHH 2014 Audemars PiguetBlancpain Breguet Bulgari Cartier Chopard Girard Perregaux Glashütte Original Hublot Jaeger LeCoultre A.Lange & Söhne Richard Mille MontblancOmega Officine Panerai Patek Philippe Piaget Roger Dubuis Rolex Seiko Ulysse Nardin Vacheron Constantin Harry Winston Zenith AHCI andindependent haute horlogerie TimeOut WristScan WatchTech Photography Automotive PuristS Chinese Digest Help Desk Collectors Market

Automotive Customize Display Mobile/PDA Support/Contact Team PuristS

ShareShareShareShareShare

1LikeLike

New MovementDevelopments, theGenequand Regulator- >> There is more happening in the watch

world than we may expect, here an example

announced yesterday, the Genequand

regulator. Photo credit CSEM Following is the

press release from Vaucher Manufacture and

the CSEM about the new Genequand

regulator: Fleurier and Neuchâtel, 15

September 2014 - A perfect... Read more..

Author: DonCorson

(8) Latest Reply: Fri, Sep 26, 2014

Approaching Resonance- part 3- >> Approaching Resonance - part 3 Don

Corson, December 2013 This is the third of a

series discussing the behaviour of so called

“resonant” watches. As we have seen these

watches are properly called watches with

coupled oscillators. Click here to read the first

instalment of this series, click here to r... Read

more..

Author: DonCorson

(5) Latest Reply: Wed, Jan 01, 2014

Approaching Resonance– part 2- >> Approaching Resonance – part 2 Don

Corson, November 2013 In the first article of

this series discussing resonance in watches I

set up a simulation of an oscillator such as the

balance wheel / hairspring pair in a mechanical

watch. I was able to determine the basic

parameters of the simulation so tha... Read

more..

Author: DonCorson

(4) Latest Reply: Sun, Nov 17, 2013

BRAND FORUMS (A-M) BRAND FORUMS (N-Z) BRAND BLOGS NEWS & FEATURES SETUP & SUPPORT

WatchTech - New Developments in Timepiece Reg... http://watchtech.watchprosite.com/show-forumpos...

1 of 4 27.10.2014 11:46

In the same paper Newton showed that replacing force of gravity from the sun by a central linear

force of attraction, the orbits remain elliptical and that the period of rotation of the planet is always the

same. It is this isochronism property of orbits that is used by the IsoSpring orbital regulator to create

a constant rotational speed regulator, i.e., the size of the orbit can vary, but the period of rotation

remains constant.

This can be imagined as a kind of sling with elastic bands. If you put a stone in a sling and let it

rotate with differing applied force, the elastics will stretch differently giving different diameters of the

stones trajectory, but the period of rotation will remain the same. Newton proved that this type of

system is isochronous, i.e. that the period of rotation is only dependent on the mass and the rigidity of

the spring holding it.

Of course, the mathematical proof depends on several assumptions, each of which could pose a

problem for a physical realisation. In particular, the assumption of a point mass with zero moment of

inertia is physically impossible. This needs to be taken into account.

The diagram shows a schematic realisation of such a system. The presentation continues with a long

treatment of the error caused by the inertia of the rotating mass on the system. It is shown that this

can be so much that the system could be useless as a timekeeper, but improvements are possible.

Moving on to the physical realisation two different models are described. The figure below shows a

realisation using flexible blades for a slingshot type embodiment. But even when optimised this type

of realisation will have errors caused by the rotational inertia.


2 of 4 27.10.2014 11:46

A method to eliminate the rotational inertia is to reduce the number of rotating pieces in the

realisation and to use a mass that does not turn. A mass that does not turn is equivalent to a

planet that travels around its orbit without changing its orientation, in which the day and the year have

the same length. Such structures can be made using flexible guidance systems known as compliant

mechanisms. Compliant mechanisms have become quite popular in the last 15 years or so. This

system allows the mass to move with 2 degrees of freedom, x (left-right) and y (forward-back), but not

to rotate. The springs realise a system in which the restoring force always points toward the center.

This type of system is called a central spring.

The figure below shows an implementation of a central spring. We can see the two thin horizontal

blades at the top and bottom that allow the movement in the y direction as well as providing the

restoring force in this direction. Inside that structure we see the vertical blades providing the flexibility

in the x direction as well as that restoring force. It is easy to see that the mass in the middle can

move in x and y directions and which allows a rotational trajectory while movement in the third

direction, z, is not possible.

To power such a regulator, the planet mass must be driven continuously with a circular motion. To

this end, a crank is used. The crank must have a variable length as when more force is used to turn

the crank, the orbit of the mass will be larger, but as we know the period of rotation will remain the

same, except for any residual isochronism error. As the only part that is turning is the crank it is

simple to keep its moment of inertia much less than that of the planet and have a theoretically

excellent isochronism.

More


3 of 4 27.10.2014 11:46

New Older Posts: visual tour of a service center...

This type of regulator results in a major simplification of the regulating system of a timekeeper. As

there is no escapement the losses of the escapement (over 50%) are eliminated and use of compliant

mechanisms instead of pivots results in a high quality factor (Q). It is hoped that very good results in

terms of power reserve and timekeeping will be obtained in the future using this system. Of course

there is still much to learn about the implementation of this kind of regulator, its reliability and

timekeeping performance in the "real world". This is the subject of ongoing research and

development at the INSTANT-LAB of the EPFL in Neuchâtel.

I would like to thank Prof. Henein and Mr. Vardi of the INSTANT-LAB and the SSC (http://www.ssc.ch)

for their friendly support with this report and allowing me to use some images from the papers of the

Journée d'Etude - Les vecteurs de l'innovatioin en horlogerie 17.09.2014.

[1]

Reading Response: 0 of 1

| Next Response

Picture Summary (click to view)

Respond to this post |

Main Post: New Developments in Timepiece Regulators – SSC Study Day 2014 DonCorson : October 22nd, 2014-00:10

Very interesting study... watercolors : October 22nd, 2014-04:26

(Time) Visitors in the last hour: Click here to see who is online Guests 240 & Registered 85

Copyright 2001-2014 PuristSPro All rights reserved.


4 of 4 27.10.2014 11:46

Documents

WatchTech - New Developments in Timepiece Reg … · 2018-10-23 · New Developments in Timepiece Regulators – SSC Study Day 2014 Date: Oct 22, 2014,00:10 AM - (view entire thread)