Wash Fed v Countrywide

  • Upload
    dinsfla

  • View
    222

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    1/118

    COMPLAINT 1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    David A. Nold, WSBA #19009Thomas W. Stone, WSBA #37559NOLD MUCHINSKY PLLC10500 NE 8th St., Ste. 930Bellevue, Washington 98004

    Phone: (425) 289-5555Attorneys for Plaintiff Washington Federal

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

    WASHINGTON FEDERAL, a federally

    chartered savings association,

    Plaintiff,

    vs.

    COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.(d/b/a BANK OF AMERICA HOMELOANS), BANK OF AMERICACORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA,N.A.,

    Defendants.

    NO.

    COMPLAINT FORBREACH OF CONTRACT ANDJURY DEMAND

    Washington Federal (Washington Federal) brings this action against Countrywide

    Home Loans, Inc. (Countrywide), d/b/a Bank of America Home Loans, and against Bank of

    America, N.A. (Bank of America), and Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and alleges as

    follows:

    I. NATURE OF ACTION1.1 This is an action for declaratory relief and breach of contract stemming from

    numerous breaches of the Mortgage Loan Purchase and Servicing Agreement (MLPSA) and

    related transactional documents associated with Washington Federals purchase from

    Countrywide of 10 pools of mortgage loans (collectively the Transaction Documents). This is

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 1 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    2/118

    COMPLAINT 2

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    also an action for breach of the Defendants servicing obligations contained in the MLPSA. A

    copy of the MLPSA is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A copy of the Transaction Documents

    associated with the first pool of loans purchased is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Transaction

    Documents related to subsequent loan pool transactions are substantially similar to those in

    Exhibit B.

    1.2 Over a period of approximately three years, Washington Federal purchased 1,046

    loans (individually, a Loan and collectively, the Loans) with an initial aggregate balance of

    approximately $400 million from Countrywide. The MLPSA and Transaction Documents

    include specific representations and warranties by Countrywide regarding the Loans, including,

    inter alia, that the Loans complied with specific underwriting guidelines, that its origination

    practices were legal, prudent and customary in the industry, that the notes and mortgages or

    deeds of trust (collectively Mortgages) were not subject to any defenses or set offs and were

    enforceable in accordance with their terms, that Countrywide was the sole owner and holder of

    the Loans, and that the Loans conformed to the parameters specified in the MLPSA and

    Transaction Documents. Countrywides representations and warranties are described in more

    detail below.

    1.3 The MLPSA provides that Countrywides representations and warranties survive

    the sale of the Loans to Washington Federal, and inure to the benefit of Washington Federal

    notwithstanding any restrictive or qualified endorsement on any mortgage note or assignment or

    Washington Federals examination or failure to examine any collateral documents or credit files.

    1.4 In addition, the MLPSA obligates Countrywide to notify Washington Federal if it

    discovers any breach of a representation or warranty and to cure such breach within 90 days of

    notice. If Countrywide cannot cure the breach, it must repurchase the Loan(s) to which the

    breach relates at a price provided in the MLPSA.

    1.5 The MLPSA further provides that Countrywide is to service and administer

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 2 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    3/118

    COMPLAINT 3

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    Mortgage Loans sold . . . in accordance with the terms of [the MLPSA]. In exchange for that

    servicing, Countrywide receives a servicing fee equal to 0.25% of the unpaid principal balance of

    the Loans. In the MLPSA, Countrywide agreed to employ procedures in accordance with the

    customary and usual standards of practice of prudent mortgage servicers. The MLPSA

    obligated Countrywide to, inter alia:

    1.5.1 [M]ake reasonable efforts, in accordance with customary and usual

    standards of practice of prudent mortgage servicers, to collect all payments due under each

    Mortgage Loan . . . (Section 4.02);

    1.5.2 [U]se reasonable efforts to foreclose upon or otherwise comparably

    convert the ownership of properties securing such of the Mortgage Loans as come into and

    continue in default and as to which no satisfactory arrangements can be made for collection of

    delinquent payments; (Section 4.03(a)).

    1.5.3 [U]se reasonable efforts to realize upon defaulted Mortgage Loans, in

    such manner as will maximize the receipt of principal and interest by [Washington Federal],

    taking into account, among other things, the timing of foreclosure proceedings. (Section

    4.03(a));

    1.5.4 [M]anage, conserve, protect and operate each REO Property in the same

    manner that it manages, conserves, protects and operates other foreclosed property for its own

    account; (Section 4.13(b)); and to

    1.5.5 [U]se reasonable efforts to dispose of each REO Property as soon as

    possible and . . . sell each REO Property no later than one (1) year after title to such REO

    Property has been obtained, unless Countrywide determines, and gives an appropriate notice to

    [Washington Federal], that a longer period is necessary for the orderly disposition of any REO

    Property. (Section 4.13(c)).

    1.6 In 2008 the Bank of America Defendants acquired Countrywide and assumed

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 3 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    4/118

    COMPLAINT 4

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    Countrywides obligations under the MLPSA. The Bank of America Defendants are successors

    and assigns under the MLPSA.

    1.7 Countrywide breached at least one representation or warranty contained in the

    MLPSA and/or the Transaction Documents materially and adversely affecting the value of the

    Mortgage Loan with respect to a very high percentage of the Loans.

    1.8 The pervasiveness and severity of the breaches of the various representations

    and warranties contained in the Transaction Documents amount to a material and substantial

    breach, which go TO the heart of the MLPSA governing all loan pool purchases.

    1.9 Defendants have also breached their promises to service the Loans in accordance

    with the requirements of the MLPSA. For example:

    1.9.1 Defendants have not used reasonable care to notify Washington Federal of

    defaults on a timely basis or of defects in the Loan documentation and underwriting;

    1.9.2 Defendants have unreasonably delayed foreclosure proceedings by

    requiring or counseling borrowers to seek to modify the terms of their Loans under programs in

    which Washington Federal does not participate;

    1.9.3 Defendants have failed to seek on a timely basis direction from

    Washington Federal as required by the MLPSA and/or have failed to follow Washington

    Federals directions as required by the MLPSA;

    1.9.4 Defendants have not used reasonable diligence in seeking relief from

    automatic stays in bankruptcy;

    1.9.5 Defendants have not taken reasonable measures to protect the value of

    Washington Federals collateral by taking control of abandoned properties or evicting persons in

    unlawful possession;

    1.9.6 Defendants have incurred excess servicing and collection costs, including

    tax penalties, forced place insurance and other unreasonable insurance charges, and unnecessary

    and unreasonably high legal fees and related expenses. As a result of these breaches,

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 4 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    5/118

    COMPLAINT 5

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    Washington Federal has been damaged in the amounts of unearned servicing fees paid to date

    and in the loss of market value of its collateral and the value of its Loans.

    II. PARTIES2.1 Washington Federal is a federally chartered savings association with

    its principal place of business and home office in Seattle, Washington. In July 2011, Washington

    Federal shortened its name from Washington Federal Savings & Loan Association, which is the

    name appearing on the MLPSA and Transaction Documents.

    2.2 Countrywide is a New York corporation with its principal place of business in

    Calabasas, California. Countrywide was the seller of the various loan pools and a party to the

    MLPSA and Transaction Documents.

    2.3 BAC is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Charlotte,

    North Carolina and offices throughout the State of Washington, including in Seattle,

    Washington.

    2.4 Bank of America, NA is a national banking association with its designated main

    office in Charlotte, North Carolina. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAC.

    III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    3.1 This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this proceeding pursuant to 28

    U.S.C. 1332(a), as the Plaintiff is a citizen of the State of Washington, the Defendants are all

    citizens of states other than Washington, and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.

    3.2 Venue is proper in this Court because the Defendants transact business in this

    state, have offices in this state and this is the state where the relevant agreements were entered

    into.

    IV. ADDITIONAL ALLEGATIONS

    4.1 On or about December 30, 2004, Washington Federal contracted to purchase 30-

    year fixed rate jumbo mortgage Loans from Countrywide. Groups of mortgage Loans (pools)

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 5 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    6/118

    COMPLAINT 6

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    were purchased in a series of ten transactions between December 30, 2004 and September 29,

    2006.

    4.2 A single master Mortgage Loan Purchase and Servicing Agreement

    (MLPSA), dated December 30, 2004 governed all of the Loan pool purchase transactions. In

    addition, various Transaction Documents applied to each specific Loan pool purchase and sale

    transaction. These Transaction Documents included for each pool: (a) a Trade Confirmation,

    which confirmed the proposed terms of a prospective purchase of a specific mortgage pool; (b) a

    Purchase Confirmation, which set forth the terms of a purchase of a specific mortgage pool;

    and (c) a Mortgage Loan Schedule, which described the attributes of the purchased Loans.

    Collectively, these documents are referred to as the Transaction Documents.

    A. Representations and Warranties Regarding Origination and Underwriting.

    4.3 In the MLPSA Countrywide set out numerous specific representations and

    warranties concerning the origination and underwriting of the Loans it was selling to Washington

    Federal. These included, inter alia, representations and warranties that as of the date of the Loan

    sale:

    4.3.1 The information contained in the Mortgage Loan Schedule was complete, true

    and correct in all material respects. MLPSA 3.02(a).

    4.3.2 There were no outstanding charges affecting the mortgaged property.

    MLPSA 3.02(c).

    4.3.3 The Mortgage Note and the Mortgage were not subject to any right of

    rescission, set-off, counterclaim or defense. MLPSA 3.02(e).

    4.3.4 All buildings on the mortgaged property were insured against loss by fire and

    hazards as are customary in the area where the mortgaged property was located. MLPSA

    3.02(f).

    4.3.5 Each Loan at the time of origination complied in all material respects

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 6 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    7/118

    COMPLAINT 7

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    with applicable state law and federal laws including truth in lending, real estate settlement

    procedures, consumer credit protection, equal credit opportunity and disclosure laws applicable

    to the Loan. MLPSA 3.02(g).

    4.3.6 The Mortgage Note and the related Mortgage were genuine and each was the

    legal, valid and binding obligation of the maker thereof, enforceable in accordance with its

    terms. MLPSA 3.02(i).

    4.3.7 The Mortgage was a valid, existing and enforceable first or second lien (as

    specified in the related Mortgage Loan Schedule) on the Mortgaged Property. MLPSA 3.02(j).

    4.3.8 Countrywide was the sole owner and holder of the Loan. Countrywide has

    good and marketable title thereto, and has full right to transfer and sell the Loan to Washington

    Federal free and clear of any encumbrance, equity, lien, pledge, charge, claim or security interest

    not specifically set forth in the related Mortgage Loan Schedule and has full right and authority

    subject to no interest or participation of, or agreement with, any other party, to sell and assign

    each Mortgage Loan pursuant to the terms of the MLPSA. MLPSA 3.02(l).

    4.3.9 The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to

    each Mortgage Note and Mortgage has been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary

    in the mortgage origination and servicing business. MLPSA 3.02(p).

    4.3.10 Unless the Loan was underwritten pursuant to one of Countrywides

    streamline documentation programs, the Credit File contained an appraisal of the related

    Mortgaged Property signed prior to the approval of the Loan application by an appraiser who (a)

    possessed the minimum requisite qualifications of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, (b) was duly

    appointed by the originator that had no interest, direct or indirect in the Mortgaged Property, and

    (c) whose compensation was not affected by the approval or disapproval of the Loan. MLPSA

    3.02(f).

    4.4 Additional representations and warranties were included in the Transaction

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 7 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    8/118

    COMPLAINT 8

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    Documents. These included representations and warranties that, inter alia, only 30-year fixed

    rate Jumbo mortgages were included in the pools and representations concerning the parameters

    of the specific Loans that were included in the respective pools, including loan-to-value ratio,

    cumulative loan-to-value ratio, FICO credit scores of borrowers, and whether Loans were full

    documentation or reduced documentation Loans.

    4.5 These representations and warranties were material to Washington Federal

    when it purchased the mortgage Loans. Countrywide promised that its Loans met certain credit

    quality thresholds that indicated that borrowers would be able to repay their Loans on time and in

    full, that the Loans were originated in accordance with legal requirements and industry

    standards. Without these representations and warranties, the Loans would have represented a

    much higher default risk and Washington Federal would not have purchased the Loans.

    B. Countrywides Breaches of the Representations and Warranties Regarding

    Origination.

    4.6 Bank of America provided Washington Federal with what it represented were the

    complete Loan files relating to a selected sample of Loans sold to Washington Federal. A

    review of the sample of mortgage loan files has revealed breaches of numerous representations

    and warranties including, inter alia:

    4.6.1 Loans that were listed as Full Doc, on the Mortgage Loan Schedule but

    which lacked standard income verification documentation.

    4.6.2 Loans that were made at an interest rate differing from that listed on the

    Mortgage Loan Schedule.

    4.6.3 Loans that were not jumbo loans, as represented in the Transaction

    Documents.

    4.6.4 Mortgage notes with facial deficiencies such as lack of proper

    endorsement, making Countrywides status as a holder questionable and giving rise to defenses.

    4.6.5 Loans underwritten outside prudent and customary origination standards

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 8 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    9/118

    COMPLAINT 9

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    in the industry, e.g., Loans approved with cash out without any tax returns or other income

    verification documentation where the borrower was self-employed and had a history of

    delinquencies and judgments.

    4.6.6 Incomplete loan files lacking deeds, notes or evidence of property hazard

    insurance.

    4.6.7 Loan-to-value and cumulative loan-to-value ratios in excess of those

    represented on the Mortgage Loan Schedules.

    4.6.8 Loans originated outside the parameters of the applicable underwriting

    guidelines, e.g., loans with excessive debt-to-income ratio, insufficient credit scores, and

    insufficient employment, income or asset verification.

    4.7 Specifically, the following breaches of specific representations and warranties

    were found:

    4.7.1 With respect to loan #100674715 in pool 3:

    4.7.1.1 There was no evidence of a Certificate of Insurance

    covering the unit, borrower or lender. This was a breach of the representation and warranty

    contained in section 3.02(f) (All buildings upon the Mortgaged Property were insured by an

    insurer acceptable to an Agency against loss by fire, hazards of extended coverage and insurer

    was licensed to do business in the state where the Mortgaged Property is located. All such

    insurance policies contain a standard mortgagee clause naming Countrywide, its successors and

    assigns as mortgagee, and all premiums thereon have been paid.).

    4.7.1.2 The loan balance was $200,000, which was below Fannie

    Mae and Freddie Mac loan limits. This was a breach of the representation and warranty

    contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan was a jumbo Mortgage Loan . . . .

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 9 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    10/118

    COMPLAINT 10

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.2 With respect to loan #102031342 in pool 3:

    4.7.2.1 The loan balance is $116,700, which was below Fannie

    Mae and Freddie Mac loan limits. This was a breach of the representations and warranties

    contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan is a jumbo Mortgage Loan . . . .

    4.7.2.2 The CLTV for this loan was 100%. Applicable

    underwriting guidelines provided that for this type of loan the maximum CLTV was 95%. This

    was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated

    August 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting

    guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loan or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting

    guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.3 With respect to loan #102031670 in pool 3:

    4.7.3.1 The loan balance was $78,400, which was below Freddie

    Mac and Fannie Mae limits. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in

    the Purchase Confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which states that, [e]ach Mortgage Loan is a

    jumbo Mortgage Loan . . . .

    4.7.3.2 The CLTV for this loan was 100%. Applicable

    underwriting guidelines provided that for this type of loan the maximum CLTV was 95%. This

    was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated

    August 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting

    guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loan or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting

    guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 10 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    11/118

    COMPLAINT 11

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.4 With respect to loan # 102522464 in pool 3:

    4.7.4.1 There was no title policy in the loan file. This was a breach

    of the representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(m) (Each Mortgage Loan

    secured by (i) a first priority Mortgage, is covered by a lender's title insurance policy acceptable

    to an Agency, issued by a title insurer acceptable to an Agency and qualified to do business in

    the jurisdiction where the related Mortgaged Property is located, insuring (subject to the

    exceptions contained in Section 3.02(j)(i), (ii) and (iii) above) Countrywide, its successors and

    assigns as to the first or second priority lien of the Mortgage, as applicable.).

    4.7.4.2 The loan balance was $102,650, which was below Fannie

    Mae and Freddie Mac limits. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in

    the Purchase Confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach Mortgage Loan is a

    jumbo Mortgage Loan . . . .

    4.7.4.3 The loan officer did not sign the final loan application.

    Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require the loan officer to sign the final loan

    application. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p)

    (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage

    Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the

    mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.4.4 Applicable underwriting guidelines provide that the

    maximum LTV/CLTV was 80/100% for a reduced doc loan with a 700 credit score. This

    borrower had a 662 credit score and the CLTV was 99.989%. This was a breach of the

    representation and warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated August 31, 2005,

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 11 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    12/118

    COMPLAINT 12

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    which stated that, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the

    prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as

    applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.4.5 The applicable underwriting guidelines provided that the

    maximum debt-to-income ratio for a reduced doc loan was 45%. The debt-to-income ratio was

    49.484%. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in the Purchase

    Confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the

    jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's

    jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.5 With respect to loan #103179593 in pool 4:

    4.7.5.1 The mortgagee clause in the title insurance policy indicated

    the broker's rather than Countrywides name and does not state, "its successors and or assigns."

    This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(f) (All buildings

    upon the Mortgaged Property are insured by an insurer acceptable to an Agency against loss by

    fire, hazards of extended coverage and insurer is licensed to do business in the state where the

    Mortgaged Property is located. All such policies contain a standard mortgagee clause naming

    Countrywide, its successors and or assigns as mortgagee . . . .).

    4.7.5.2 The signature affidavit was missing the notary's seal and

    date and the deed was missing the notary's seal. Proper, prudent and customary origination

    practices require the Signature Affidavit and Deed to be properly notarized. This was a breach

    of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection

    practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 12 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    13/118

    COMPLAINT 13

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing

    business . . . .).

    4.7.6 With respect to loan #103541533 in pool 3:

    4.7.6.1 The application signature page was not in the file, and the

    name affidavit was not notarized. Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require

    the final loan application to be signed and dated by the borrower and loan officer; and the name

    affidavit notarized. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section

    3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each

    Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in

    the mortgage origination and servicing business . . . .).

    4.7.6.2 The borrowers debt-to-income ratio was 48.171%.

    Countrywide guidelines provide that the maximum debt-to-income ratio for an 80% LTV

    Full/Alt loan was 40%. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in the

    Purchase Confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach Mortgage Loan

    conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or

    Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of

    origination.

    4.7.7 With respect to loan #103546694 in pool 7:

    4.7.7.1 At the time of closing the subordination agreement for the

    borrower's second Deed of Trust had not been recorded. There was no subordination agreement

    in the file. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(j)

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 13 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    14/118

    COMPLAINT 14

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    (The Mortgage is a valid, existing and enforceable first or second lien (as specified in the

    related Mortgage Loan Schedule) on the Mortgaged Property . . . .).

    4.7.7.2 The mortgagee clause in the insurance policy indicated

    Countrywide's name, but did not state, "its successors and or assigns", and the loan number was

    missing. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(f) (All

    buildings upon the Mortgaged Property are insured by an insurer acceptable to an Agency

    against loss by fire, hazards of extended coverage and insurer is licensed to do business in the

    state where the Mortgaged Property is located. All such policies contain a standard mortgagee

    clause naming Countrywide, its successors and or assigns as mortgagee . . . .).

    4.7.8 With respect to loan #104794086 in pool 5:

    4.7.8.1 There was no assignment of mortgage in the file. This was

    a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(x) (Except for the absence

    of recording information, the Assignment of Mortgage is in recordable form and is acceptable for

    recording under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Mortgaged Property is located.).

    4.7.9 With respect to loan #106652597 in pool 9:

    4.7.9.1 The Note was not endorsed in blank or to Countrywide.

    This was a breach of the representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(e) (The

    Mortgage Note and the Mortgage are not subject to any right of rescission, set-off, counterclaim

    or defense . . . .) and section 3.02(l) (Countrywide is the sole owner and holder of the

    Mortgage Loan. The Mortgage Loan is not assigned or pledged, and Countrywide has good and

    marketable title thereto, and has full right to transfer and sell the Mortgage Loan to the Purchaser

    free and clear . . . .)

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 14 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    15/118

    COMPLAINT 15

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.9.2 There was no assignment of mortgage in the file. This was

    a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(x) (Except for the absence

    of recording information, the Assignment of Mortgage is in recordable form and is acceptable for

    recording under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Mortgaged Property is located.)

    4.7.9.3 The loan officer did not sign the final loan application. The

    address on the loan documents and insurance binder does not match the address on the appraisal

    and title report. Proper, prudent and customary origination practices required the final loan

    application to be signed and dated by the loan officer, the note should be initialed correctly, and

    the property address verified. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in

    section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to

    each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary

    in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . . .).

    4.7.10 With respect to loan #106658014 in pool 9:

    4.7.10.1 The borrowers debt-to-income ratio was 49.578%. The

    underwriters (Universal American Mortgage Company), underwriting guidelines provide that

    the maximum debt-to-income ratio for a Full Doc loan where the CLTV is 95% is 38% (or 45%

    for an 80/20 loan). This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in the

    Purchase Confirmation dated April 28, 2006, which stated that, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms

    to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's

    jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.11 With respect to loan # 106723086 in pool 7:

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 15 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    16/118

    COMPLAINT 16

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.11.1 The Notice of Right to Cancel was not in the file. Proper,

    prudent and customary origination practices required the Notice of Right to Cancel to be signed

    and dated. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p)

    (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage

    Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the

    mortgage origination and servicing business . . . .).

    4.7.12 With respect to loan # 107334680 in pool 8:

    4.7.12.1 The loan officer did not sign the final loan application.

    Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require the final loan application to be

    signed and dated by the loan officer. This was a breach of the representation and warranty

    contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with

    respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and

    customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . . .).

    4.7.12.2 The borrowers debt-to-income ratio was 52.40%.

    Countrywides guidelines provide that the maximum debt-to-income ratio for an 80% LTV

    Full/Alt loan is 40%. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in the

    Purchase Confirmation dated March 31, 2006, which stated that, [e]ach Mortgage Loan

    conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or

    Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of

    origination.

    4.7.13 With respect to loan # 109144307 in pool 4:

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 16 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    17/118

    COMPLAINT 17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.13.1 The loan officer did not sign the final loan application.

    Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require the final loan application to be

    signed and dated by the loan officer. This is a breach of the representation and warranty

    contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with

    respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and

    customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . . .)

    4.7.13.2 No business license, tax return or asset verification was in

    the file. Countrywide's Reduced Doc documentation requirements required that the borrower's

    employment and assets be verified. This is a breach of the representation and warranty contained

    in the Purchase Confirmation dated September 30, 2005, which stated, [e]ach Mortgage Loan

    conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or

    Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of

    origination.

    4.7.14 With respect to loan # 109620780 in pool 5:

    4.7.14.1 There was no flood certificate in the file and the hazard

    insurance coverage may be inadequate. Proper, prudent and customary loan origination practices

    require a flood certificate to be in the file, and adequate hazard insurance coverage. This was a

    breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(f) (All buildings upon the

    Mortgaged property are insured by an insurer acceptable to an Agency against loss by fire . . . .)

    and section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect

    to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and

    customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . . .).

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 17 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    18/118

    COMPLAINT 18

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.14.2 No business license was in the file (business license

    information pulled from the Washington State Dept. of Revenue website). Countrywide's

    Reduced Documentation requirements require that the borrower's employment be verified. This

    was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated

    October 28, 2005, which stated, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting

    guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting

    guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.14.3 There was no Assignment of Mortgage in the file. This

    was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(x) (Except for the

    absence of recording information, the Assignment of Mortgage is in recordable form and is

    acceptable for recording under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Mortgaged Property is

    located.).

    4.7.14.4 Countrywide's Clues Report imposed an underwriting

    condition that the borrower provide an explanation letter for four recent credit inquiries, and the

    letter was not in the file. Proper, prudent and customary loan origination practices require

    compliance with all underwriter conditions. This was a breach of representation and warranty

    contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with

    respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and

    customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . . .) and the representation and

    warranty in the Purchase Confirmation dated October 28, 2005, which stated, [e]ach Mortgage

    Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loans

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 18 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    19/118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    20/118

    COMPLAINT 20

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.16.3 The title policy did not identify the trust identified on the

    mortgage. Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require the name on the

    mortgage to match the name on the title insurance policy. This was a breach of the

    representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection

    practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in

    all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing

    business . . . .).

    4.7.17 With respect to loan # 110251853 in pool 3:

    4.7.17.1 The final inspection and photos were not in the file.

    Proper, prudent and customary origination practices for new construction require the subject

    property be completed per plans and specifications and evidence of completion to be in the file.

    This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The

    origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note

    and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage

    origination and servicing business . . . . ).

    4.7.17.2 The Certificate of Occupancy from the appropriate

    authorities was not in the file. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in

    section 3.02(w) (To the best of Countrywide's knowledge, all inspections, licenses and

    certificates required to be made or issued with respect to all occupied portions of the Mortgaged

    property, and with respect to the use and occupancy of the same including certificates of

    occupancy, have been made or obtained from the appropriate authorities.)

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 20 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    21/118

    COMPLAINT 21

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.17.3 The loan documents (mortgage and note etc.) indicate the

    city is North Las Vegas; and the Appraisal, Title and Flood Cert. indicate the city is Las Vegas.

    Proper, prudent and customary origination practices are to verify the property address. This was

    a breach of representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and

    collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage

    have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and

    servicing business . . . .).

    4.7.18 With respect to loan # 110252325 in pool 3:

    4.7.18.1 The loan officer did not sign the final loan application.

    Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require the final loan application to be

    signed and dated by the loan officer. This was a breach of the representation and warranty

    contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with

    respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and

    customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . . . ).

    4.7.19 With respect to loan # 110633599 in pool 3:

    4.7.19.1 The borrowers most recent monthly asset or bank

    statement was not in the file (this loan is a cash-out refinance). The applicable underwriting

    guidelines require the borrower's employment and assets to be verified. There is no business

    license or CPA letter in the file. Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require the

    borrowers employment and assets to be verified. This was a breach in the representation and

    warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 21 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    22/118

    COMPLAINT 22

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . . .); and the

    representations and warranties contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated August 31, 2005,

    which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior

    owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as

    applicable, in effect at the time of origination..

    4.7.19.2 The loan amount was $150,000, which is below Fannie

    Mae and Freddie Mac limits. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in

    the Purchase confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan is a

    jumbo Mortgage Loan . . . .

    4.7.19.3 The property address was not indicated on the insurance

    binder. The insurance agent has used the legal description for the property address. This was a

    breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(f) (All buildings upon the

    Mortgaged property are insured by an insurer acceptable to an Agency against loss by fire,

    hazards of extended coverage . . . .).

    4.7.20 With respect to loan #110633615 in pool 3:

    4.7.20.1 The loan balance was $232,000, which was below Fannie

    Mae and Freddie Mac loan limits. This was a breach of the representations and warranties

    contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which states that, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan is a jumbo Mortgage Loan . . . .

    4.7.21 With respect to loan #110633735 in pool 3:

    4.7.21.1 The Loan amount was $183,920, which was below Fannie

    Mae and Freddie Mac limits. This was a breach in the representation and warranty contained in

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 22 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    23/118

    COMPLAINT 23

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    the Purchase confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan is a

    jumbo mortgage and a fixed rate mortgage loan . . . .

    4.7.22 With respect to loan #110633767 in pool 3:

    4.7.22.1 The Loan amount was $249,600, which was below Fannie

    Mae and Freddie Mac limits. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in

    the Purchase confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan is a

    jumbo mortgage Loan . . . .

    4.7.22.2 The Note was not endorsed in blank or to Countrywide.

    This was a breach of the representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(e) (The

    Mortgage Note and the Mortgage are not subject to any right of rescission, set-off, counterclaim

    or defense. . . .) and section 3.02(l) (Countrywide is the sole owner and holder of the Mortgage

    Loan. The Mortgage Loan is not assigned or pledged, and Countrywide has good and

    marketable title thereto, and has full right to transfer and sell the Mortgage Loan to the Purchaser

    free and clear . . . ).

    4.7.23 With respect to loan # 110633815 in pool 3:

    4.7.23.1 No assets are indicated on the application and the loan is a

    cash-out refinance. The applicable underwriting guidelines require that the borrower's

    employment and assets be verified. The underwriter's Loan Approval indicates this is a limited

    doc loan and that Partner Loan Services performed a verbal verification of employment

    (VOE). The borrower is self-employed and there is no tax return or CPA letter in the file. The

    Underwriter's Decision indicates there is no business data available on-line. This was a breach

    of the representation and warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated August 31,

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 23 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    24/118

    COMPLAINT 24

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    2005, which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the

    prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as

    applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.23.2 The Loan amount was $170,300, which is below Fannie

    Mae and Freddie Mac limits. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in

    the Purchase Confirmation dated August 31, 2005, which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan is a

    jumbo Mortgage Loan . . . .

    4.7.23.3 The insurance binder uses only the legal description for the

    property address. The property address is not indicated on the insurance binder. This was a

    breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(f) (All buildings upon the

    Mortgaged property are insured by an insurer acceptable to an Agency against loss by fire,

    hazards of extended coverage . . . .).

    4.7.24 With respect to loan # 110633896 in pool 3:

    4.7.24.1 The insurance binder was not in the file. Proper, prudent

    and customary loan origination and collection practices require an insurance binder. This was a

    breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(f) (All buildings upon the

    Mortgaged property are insured by an insurer acceptable to an Agency against loss by fire,

    hazards of extended coverage . . . .) and section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection

    practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in

    all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing

    business . . . .).

    4.7.25 With respect to loan # 111434157 in pool 4:

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 24 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    25/118

    COMPLAINT 25

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.25.1 The final loan application was not signed by the loan

    officer, and a copy of the deed is not in the file. Proper, prudent and customary loan origination

    and collection practices require the final application to be signed by the loan officer, and a copy

    of the seller's deed to be in the file. This was a breach of the representation and warranty

    contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with

    respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and

    customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.26 With respect to loan # 111436725 in pool 4:

    4.7.26.1 The title report was not in the file, and the new house

    payment is $3,882. The Underwriter's Commitment Letter conditions the loan on receipt of a

    copy of the title report to verify the seller is vested in title, and that the borrower's new house

    payment is not to exceed $3,647. Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require

    that all of the underwriter's conditions be satisfied. This was a breach of the representation and

    warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.26.2 The final loan application was not signed by the loan

    officer, and a copy of the deed is not in the file. Proper, prudent and customary loan origination

    and collection practices require the final application be signed by the loan officer and a copy of

    the seller's deed to be in the file. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained

    in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 25 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    26/118

    COMPLAINT 26

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary

    in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . . .).

    4.7.27 With respect to loan # 112081171 in pool 4:

    4.7.27.1 The Loan amount was $158,000, which is below applicable

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac limits. This was a breach of the representation and warranty

    contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated September 30, 2005, which states, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan is a jumbo mortgage and a fixed rate mortgage loan. . . .).

    4.7.27.2 No assets were verified. The applicable underwriting

    guidelines and proper, prudent and customary loan origination practices require that the

    borrower's assets be verified with the most recent monthly bank or asset statement. This was a

    breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and

    collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage

    have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and

    servicing business. . . .) and the representation and warranty contained in the Purchase

    Confirmation dated September 30, 2005, which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the

    jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's

    jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.27.3 The borrowers DTI was 52.2817%. The underwriter

    guidelines provide that the maximum DTI for this loan program was 50%. This was a breach of

    the representation and warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated September 30,

    2005, which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 26 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    27/118

    COMPLAINT 27

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as

    applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.27.4 The final loan application was not signed by the loan

    officer. Proper, prudent and customary loan origination and collection practices require the final

    application to be signed by the loan officer. This was a breach of the representation and

    warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . . ).

    4.7.28 With respect to loan # 112081243 in pool 4:

    4.7.28.1 The Note was not endorsed in blank or to Countrywide.

    This was a breach of the representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(e) (The

    Mortgage Note and the Mortgage are not subject to any right of rescission, set-off, counterclaim

    or defense . . . .) and section 3.02(l) (Countrywide is the sole owner and holder of the

    Mortgage Loan. The Mortgage Loan is not assigned or pledged, and Countrywide has good and

    marketable title thereto, and has full right to transfer and sell the Mortgage Loan to the Purchaser

    free and clear . . . .).

    4.7.28.2 The Loan amount was $123,950, which was below

    applicable Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac limits. This was a breach of the representation and

    warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated September 30, 2005, which states,

    [e]ach Mortgage Loan is a jumbo Mortgage Loan . . . .

    4.7.28.3 No assets were verified. The underwriters final report

    indicates that no business data is available on-line for the borrower's current employer. The

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 27 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    28/118

    COMPLAINT 28

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    applicable underwriting guidelines require that the borrower's assets be verified with the most

    recent monthly statement. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in

    section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to

    each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary

    in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .); and the representation and warranty

    contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated September 30, 2005, which states, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the

    Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect

    at the time of origination.

    4.7.28.4 The final loan application was not signed by the loan

    officer. Proper, prudent and customary loan origination and collection practices require the final

    application to be signed by the loan officer. This was a breach of the representation and

    warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.28.5 There was no assignment of mortgage in the file. This was

    a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(x) (Except for the absence

    of recording information, the Assignment of Mortgage is in recordable form and is acceptable for

    recording under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Mortgaged Property is located.).

    4.7.29 With respect to loan # 112081267 in pool 4:

    4.7.29.1 The Loan amount was $171,200, which was below

    applicable Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac limits. This was a breach of the representation and

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 28 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    29/118

    COMPLAINT 29

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated September 30, 2005, which states,

    [e]ach Mortgage Loan is a jumbo mortgage and a fixed rate mortgage loan. . . .

    4.7.29.2 No assets were indicated on the application and no assets

    were verified. Borrower received $1,786.20 cash back on the HUD. The applicable

    underwriting guidelines and proper, prudent and customary origination practices require the

    borrower's assets to be verified with the most recent monthly bank statement. This was a breach

    of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection

    practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in

    all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing

    business. . . . ); and the representation and warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation

    dated September 30, 2005, which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo

    underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit

    underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.29.3 The property address was not indicated on the insurance

    binder; only the legal description is indicated. The underwriters guidelines and proper, prudent

    and customary origination practices require that the homeowner's policy show that the mailing

    address and property address are the same. This was a breach of the representation and warranty

    contained in section 3.02(f) (All buildings upon the Mortgaged property are insured by an

    insurer acceptable to an Agency against loss by fire, hazards of extended coverage. . . .; section

    3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each

    Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in

    the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .); and the representation and warranty

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 29 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    30/118

    COMPLAINT 30

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated September 30, 2005, which states, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the

    Mortgage Loans or Countrywides jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect

    at the time of origination.

    4.7.30 With respect to loan # 112238921 in pool 4:

    4.7.30.1 After funding, during a post-closing audit, Ohio Savings

    Bank determined that the APR and Finance Charge on the final Truth in Lending Disclosure

    (TIL) was understated. Per Ohio Savings Bank's letter in the file, they made the necessary

    adjustments, and informed the borrower. A corrected TIL was sent to the borrower along with a

    refund check in the amount of $491. The corrected TIL in the file isn't signed by the borrower.

    This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(g) (Each

    Mortgage Loan at the time of origination complied in all material respects with applicable state

    law and federal laws including Truth-In-Lending. . . .).

    4.7.30.2 The final application was not signed by the loan officer.

    Proper, prudent and customary loan origination and collection practices require the final

    application be signed by the loan officer. This was a breach in the representation and warranty

    contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with

    respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and

    customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.30.3 A copy of the deed was not in the file. Proper, prudent and

    customary loan origination and collection practices require a copy of the deed be in the file. This

    was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 30 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    31/118

    COMPLAINT 31

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage

    have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and

    servicing business. . . . ).

    4.7.30.4 The HUD in the file wasnt signed by the seller. Proper,

    prudent and customary loan origination and collection practices require a copy of the seller's

    signed HUD be in the file. This was a breach in the representation and warranty contained in

    section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to

    each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary

    in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.30.5 The borrower's HUD indicates the seller credited the

    borrower $12,000, and the borrower's costs were only $9,985.07. The borrower paid $8,003

    above the appraisal value for the property (sales price $516,003 and appraisal value $508,000).

    Proper, prudent and customary loan origination and collection practices require that the seller

    paid closing costs cannot exceed the borrower's actual costs. If this was a sales concession, a

    reduced sales price should have been reflected. This was a breach of the representation and

    warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.30.6 The borrower is married, but the spouse did not sign the

    TIL. Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require that the borrowers spouse sign

    the TIL. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The

    origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 31 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    32/118

    COMPLAINT 32

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage

    origination and servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.30.7 There was no tax return or business license in the file.

    Instead, business information was pulled from the State of Arizonas public access system, and

    was last updated July 29, 2003. The applicable underwriting guidelines require that the

    borrower's employment be verified with a business license or tax return. This was a breach of

    the representation and warranty contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated September 30,

    2005, which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the

    prior owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as

    applicable, in effect at the time of origination.

    4.7.31 With respect to loan # 97207103 in pool 4:

    4.7.31.1 The note was not endorsed in blank or to Countrywide.

    This was a breach of the representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(e) (The

    Mortgage Note and the Mortgage are not subject to any right of rescission, set-off, counterclaim

    or defense . . .) and section 3.02(l) (Countrywide is the sole owner and holder of the Mortgage

    Loan. The Mortgage Loan is not assigned or pledged, and Countrywide has good and

    marketable title thereto, and has full right to transfer and sell the Mortgage Loan to the Purchaser

    free and clear . . .).

    4.7.31.2 The loan officer failed to sign and date the final loan

    application. Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require the final loan

    application to be signed and dated by the loan officer. This was a breach of the representation

    and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 32 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    33/118

    COMPLAINT 33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . .).

    4.7.31.3 There was no signed 4506T in the file. The applicable

    underwriting guidelines required a signed 4506T and the underwriter conditioned approval upon

    receipt of a signed 4506T. Proper, prudent and customary loan origination practices require a

    signed 4506T and require that an underwriters conditions be satisfied. This was a breach of the

    representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection

    practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in

    all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing

    business. . .) and in the Purchase Confirmation dated May 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the

    Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect

    at the time of origination.

    4.7.31.4 There was no final title report or policy in the file. Proper,

    prudent and customary practices require a copy of the title report and policy. This was a breach

    of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection

    practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in

    all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing

    business . . . .).

    4.7.31.5 There was no Deed in the file. Proper, prudent and

    customary practices require a copy of the Deed. This was a breach of the representation and

    warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 33 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    34/118

    COMPLAINT 34

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . .).

    4.7.31.6 The underwriter conditioned approval upon determination

    that the borrowers income to be deemed reasonable and consistent with the borrowers

    occupation, which was not present in the file. Proper, prudent and customary origination

    practices require verification of income for the borrower. This was a breach of the representation

    and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . .).

    4.7.32 With respect to loan # 97094120 in pool 2:

    4.7.32.1 The loan officer and borrower failed to date the final loan

    application. Proper, prudent and customary origination practices require the final loan

    application to be dated by the loan officer and borrower. This was a breach of the representation

    and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business . . .).

    4.7.32.2 There was no appraisal in the file. Proper, prudent and

    customary origination practices require a copy of the appraisal in the file. This was a breach of

    the representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection

    practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in

    all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing

    business . . .) and section 3.02(t) (The Credit File contains an appraisal of the related

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 34 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    35/118

    COMPLAINT 35

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    Mortgaged Property signed prior to the approval of the Mortgage loan application by an

    appraiser who meets the minimum requisite qualifications by an Agency for appraisers . . .).

    4.7.32.3 There was no verification of assets in the file. The

    applicable underwriting guidelines required verification of assets. Proper, prudent and

    customary loan origination practices require verification of assets. This was a breach of the

    representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection

    practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in

    all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing

    business. . .) and in the Purchase Confirmation dated May 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the

    Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect

    at the time of origination.

    4.7.32.4 There was no verification of income in the file. The

    applicable underwriting guidelines required verification of income. Proper, prudent and

    customary loan origination practices require verification of income. This was a breach of the

    representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection

    practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in

    all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing

    business. . .) and in the Purchase Confirmation dated May 31, 2005, which stated that, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior owner of the

    Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect

    at the time of origination.

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 35 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    36/118

    COMPLAINT 36

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    4.7.32.5 There was no Deed or Purchase and Sale Agreement in the

    file. Proper, prudent and customary practices require a copy of the Deed and the Purchase and

    Sale Agreement. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section

    3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each

    Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in

    the mortgage origination and servicing business . . .).

    4.7.32.6 The borrower was married and was to hold title as an

    individual; the Loan Closing Instructions required the borrowers spouse to execute a disclaimer

    deed. No such deed was in the file. Proper, prudent and customary loan origination practices

    require adherence to the Loan Closing Instructions. This was a breach of the representations and

    warranties contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . .).

    4.7.32.7 The Certificate of Occupancy was not in the file. Without

    an appraisal in the file, it is impossible to determine the age of the building. Proper, prudent and

    customary loan origination practices require a copy of the Certificate of Occupancy be in the file

    for new construction. This was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section

    3.02(w) (To the best of Countrywide's knowledge, the mortgaged property is lawfully occupied

    under applicable law . . . .).

    4.7.32.8 An account listed on the credit report was omitted from the

    application and the underwriting analysis. The underwriter conditioned approval upon receipt of

    documentation supporting the omission of the liability. No such verification was in the file.

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 36 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    37/118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    38/118

    COMPLAINT 38

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as applicable, in effect

    at the time of origination; section 3.02(p) (The origination and collection practices used by

    Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage have been in all respects legal,

    proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.34 With respect to loan #117037134 in pool 8:

    4.7.34.1 The second note and copies of the third party bill payoffs

    are not in the file. Aegis' Underwriting Decision requires a copy of the second note, and copies

    of third party bills appearing on the HUD. Proper, prudent and customary origination practices

    require that all of the underwriter's conditions be satisfied. This was a breach of the

    representations and warranties contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated March 31, 2005,

    which states, [e]ach Mortgage Loan conforms to the jumbo underwriting guidelines of the prior

    owner of the Mortgage Loans or Countrywide's jumbo credit underwriting guidelines, as

    applicable, in effect at the time of origination, and section 3.02(p) (The origination and

    collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage

    have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and

    servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.34.2 The borrowers spouse did not sign the Notice of

    Right to Cancel. The spouse is on title. Proper, prudent and customary loan origination

    practices require the non-borrowing spouse to sign the Notice of Right to Cancel if on title. This

    was a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination

    and collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 38 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    39/118

    COMPLAINT 39

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and

    servicing business. . . .).

    4.7.35 With respect to loan #118062513 in pool 9:

    4.7.35.1 The Note was not endorsed in blank or to Countrywide.

    This was a breach of the representations and warranties contained in section 3.02(e) (The

    Mortgage Note and the Mortgage are not subject to any right of rescission, set-off, counterclaim

    or defense. . . .) and section 3.02(l) (Countrywide is the sole owner and holder of the Mortgage

    Loan. The Mortgage Loan is not assigned or pledged, and Countrywide has good and

    marketable title thereto, and has full right to transfer and sell the Mortgage Loan to the Purchaser

    free and clear. . . .).

    4.7.35.2 The Loan amount was $260,950, which is below applicable

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac limits. This was a breach of the representation and warranty

    contained in the Purchase Confirmation dated April 28, 2006, which states that, [e]ach

    Mortgage Loan is a jumbo Mortgage Loan . . . .

    4.7.35.3 The spouse did not sign the TIL. Proper, prudent and

    customary loan origination practices require the non-borrowing spouse to sign the TIL. This was

    a breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(p) (The origination and

    collection practices used by Countrywide with respect to each Mortgage Note and Mortgage

    have been in all respects legal, proper, prudent and customary in the mortgage origination and

    servicing business . . . .).

    4.7.35.4 The title report required an affidavit from the borrower that

    was not in the file, and the ALTA was not showing clear title. Proper, prudent and customary

    Case 2:12-cv-01820 Document 1 Filed 10/16/12 Page 39 of 118

  • 7/31/2019 Wash Fed v Countrywide

    40/118

    COMPLAINT 40

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Nold Muchinsky PLLCBellevue Place, Suite 930

    10500 NE 8th StreetBellevue, WA 98004

    425.289.5555 FAX425.289.6666

    collection practices require the title report conditions be cleared prior to closing. This was a

    breach of the representation and warranty contained in section 3.02(j) (The Mortgage is a valid,

    existing and enforceable first or second lien (as specified in the related Mortgage Loan Schedule)

    on the Mortgaged Property, including all improvements on the Mortgaged Property, subject only

    to (i) the lien of current real property taxes and assessments not yet due and payable; (ii)

    covenants, conditions and restrictions, rights of way, easements and other matters of public

    record as of the date of recording that are acceptable to mortgage lending institutions generally

    and specifically referred to in lender's title insurance policy delivered to the originator of the

    Mortgage Loan and that do not adversely affect the Appraised Value (as evidenced by an

    appraisal referred to in such definition) of the Mortgaged Property; (iii) if a second lien,