Upload
hadieu
View
217
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Warm Mix Asphalt Perpetual PavementWMA Technical Working Group MeetingBaltimore, MarylandDecember 12-13, 2007
Shad M. Sargand, Russ ProfessorDept. of Civil Engineering Ohio UniversityOhio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment (ORITE)
In cooperation withProfs. J. Ludwig Figueroa and Sang-Soo Kim
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 2
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 3
Warm Mix AsphaltTechnical Working Group (TWG)
Warm Mix AsphaltTechnical Working Group (TWG)
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 4
ORITE Warm Mix Asphalt Research ProjectORITE Warm Mix Asphalt Research Project
• Detailed field, controlled environment, and laboratory evaluation of
– Aspha-min, Evotherm, and Sasobit and Conventional
• Field study in Guernsey County, OH on State Route 541
• Controlled load and environment test at ORITE’s Accelerated Pavement Load Facility (APLF) in Lancaster, OH
• Laboratory studies of cores, field-procured beams and prepared specimens
• Project sponsored by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the the US Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 5
ORITE Warm Mix Asphalt Research ProjectORITE Warm Mix Asphalt Research Project
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 6
GUE-541 WMA Field StudyGUE-541 WMA Field Study
• Four test sections on asphalt overlay Kimbolton and Plainfield, West of I-77, just north of I-70
– Site selected by ODOT
– Overlay constructed first half of September 2006
– Contractor: Shelley and Sands, Inc.
• Overlay layers
– Top: 1.25 in (3.18 cm) of selected mix
• Aspha-min, Sasobit, Evotherm, & conventional (HMA)
– Bottom: 0.75 in (1.90 cm) HMA
• Section lengths: 2.70 miles (4.34 km) to 3.07 miles (4.94 km)
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 7
GUE-541 Forensic Assessment of Existing Pavement Structure
GUE-541 Forensic Assessment of Existing Pavement Structure
Preliminary Investigation
• Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD)
– Back calculate pavement layer stiffness
• Surface Profile
• Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)
• Forensic analysis used to identify weak spots needing remediation prior to overlay
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 8
Energy, Emissions, and Cost AssessmentEnergy, Emissions, and Cost Assessment
Investigations During Construction:
• Stack and Emissions tests
• Infrared camera to measure temperature during laydown
• Exposure/emissions sampling
– Environmental sensors placed on paver and along side of road
• Construction costs for each section were also noted
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 9
Infrared CameraInfrared Camera
Images from GUE 541
Sasobit WMASasobit WMA
Temperatures in Fahrenheit (216°F=102°C, 301°F=149°C)
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 10
Emissions sampling on paverEmissions sampling on paver
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 11
Roadside emissions samplingRoadside emissions sampling
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 12
GUE-541 Construction MonitoringGUE-541 Construction Monitoring
Subsequent Investigations:
• FWD after overlay prior to traffic and at future intervals
• Periodic visual surveys of pavement surface condition
• Profilometer measurements
• Forensic analysis following SHRP protocol of distresses during three-year research period
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 13
Laboratory TestsLaboratory Tests
• Based on samples of mixes and additives taken at the APLF and at GUE-541
• Samples taken at the time of construction
• Additional core samples taken or to be taken after construction
– Three months, one year, two years
• Testing by both ORITE and NCAT
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 14
ORITE Laboratory TestsORITE Laboratory Tests
• Density Tests during construction, and after 3, 12, 24 months • Bond strength between layers • Assessment of reduced aging during construction. • Indirect tensile strength at 3, 12, 24 months• Assessment of in-place densification under traffic, related to
air voids at time of construction. • Aging of binder as a function of time. • Beam fatigue tests (AASHTO T321). • Fracture energy – an alternative method of assessing
resistance to cracking.• Other methods of assessing cracking potential may also be
used, such as the TTI overlay tester.• Low-temperature cracking (IDT test (AASHTO T322))
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 15
Air Voids of APLF PavementsAir Voids of APLF Pavements
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Control Asphamin Evotherm Sasobit
WMA Type
Air
Void
(APL
F)
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 16
Air Void of Cores (3 Months after Construction)Air Void of Cores (3 Months after Construction)
01
23
456
78
910
Control Asphamin Evotherm Sasobit
Warm Mix Type
Air
Void
(%)
On Wheel PathBetween Wheel Paths
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 17
Indirect Tensile Strength(0, 3, 12 month cores)
Indirect Tensile Strength(0, 3, 12 month cores)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Control
Aspham
in
Evotherm
Sasobit
Control
Aspham
in
Evotherm
Sasobit
Indi
rect
Ten
sile
Stre
ngth
(psi
) 0 months3 months12 months
On Wheel Path Between Wheel Paths
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 18
NCAT Laboratory TestsNCAT Laboratory Tests
• Moisture content in truck at time of application,
• Gyratory compaction,
• Volumetric properties,
• Hamburg Tests for moisture susceptibility and rutting,
• Rutting potential,
• Maximum specific gravity,
• Tensile strength ratio test,
• Anticipated in-place field density
• Thermal stress restricted specimen test may be conducted as an option
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 19
Accelerated Pavement Load Facility (APLF)Accelerated Pavement Load Facility (APLF)
• Full-scale two-lane pavement, with base, and subgrade
• Asphaltic Materials and PCC.
• Full environmental control to regulate humidity and temp from 10°F (-12°C) to 130°F (54°C).
• Multiple test paths across the 32-ft (9.75 m) wide pavement.
• A rolling tire load of 9000 lb (40 kN) to 30,000 lb (133 kN) to simulate a slowly moving truck (≤5 mph (≤8 km/h)) with single or dual tires or wide single tires
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 20
Controlled Load and Environment Testing at the Accelerated Pavement Load Facility (APLF)
Controlled Load and Environment Testing at the Accelerated Pavement Load Facility (APLF)
• Built Identical WMA and HMA surface layers – Same mix used (Aspha-min, Evotherm, Sasobit, & HMA)– Built on perpetual pavement sections at two thicknesses
• Testing under load at three temperatures: • FWD• Collect Pavement Response data• Infrared camera (during construction)
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 21
Installation at the APLFInstallation at the APLF
Paving in the APLF
Sensor placement
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 22
Infrared CameraInfrared Camera
Images from APLF
Conventional HMAEvothermNote with software program cursor can be moved and
temperature read off upper right corner.
Temperatures in Fahrenheit (216°F=102°C, 301°F=149°C)
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 23
APLF EquipmentAPLF Equipment
Load Wheel behind beam
Profilometer placed under load wheel beam
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 24
APLF MonitoringAPLF Monitoring
• Environmental parameters
– pavement layer temperature
– Base temperature and moisture
– Subgrade temperature, moisture, and groundwater table
• Load parameters
– Displacement
– Strain
– Pressure
• Also seasonal response in terms of displacement and pressure
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 25
APLF Test MethodAPLF Test Method
• Tests conducted in this order:– Low temperature (40°F (4.4°C))
– Medium temperature (70°F (21.1°C))
– High temperature (105°F (40.6°C))
• At each temperature and for each pavement:
– Collect data from instruments at beginning with tire loads of 6 kip (27 kN), 9 kip (40 kN), and 12 kip (53 kN)
– 10,000 passes at tire load of 9 kip (40 kN) at 5 mph (8 km/h)
– Collect data at end with same loads as at beginning
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 26
Layers of WMA pavements constructed in APLFprofile view
Layers of WMA pavements constructed in APLFprofile view
1.25” (3.18 cm) Warm or Hot Mix Asphalt (WMA or HMA) surface course3” (7.62 cm) ODOT 448 Type II ACVaried depth (A) or 7.75” (19.7 cm) (B) ODOT 448 Type I AC
4” (10.2 cm) Fatigue Resistant AC[13.75” (34.9 cm) - VD] (A) or 6” (15.3 cm) (B) ODOT 304 DGAB
48” Type A6-A7 Subgrade soil
(not to scale)
Surface courses and VD (“varied depth”) of Type I AC displayed on next slide
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 27
Layout of WMA pavements constructed in APLFplan view
Layout of WMA pavements constructed in APLFplan view
Evotherm WMA VD=4.75” (12.1 cm)
Evotherm WMA Standard depth
8 ft (2.44 m)
Sasobit WMA VD=5.75” (14.6 cm)
Sasobit WMA Standard depth
8 ft (2.44 m)
Aspha-min WMA VD=6.75” (17.1 cm)
Aspha-min WMA Standard depth
8 ft (2.44 m)
Conventional HMA VD=7.75” (19.7 cm)
Conventional HMA Standard depth
8 ft (2.44 m)
22.5 ft (6.9 m) 22.5 ft (6.9 m)
Load wheel directionA B
Notes: WMA or HMA surface layer is 1.25” (3.18 cm);VD=varied depth of ODOT 448 Type I AC; Standard Depth is 7.75” (19.7 cm); DGAB layer is 13.75” (34.9 cm)-VD (Standard DGAB layer is 6” (15.3 cm));
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 28
Instrumentation in APLFInstrumentation in APLF
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 29
Control (HMA) Section Results from APLFControl (HMA) Section Results from APLF
1 2 3 4 5
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Control Section 97°F Surface, 90°F Bottom 0 Runs
Longitudinal Strain Transverse Strain
Mic
rost
rain
Time, seconds
0 Runs at high temperature
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 30
Control (HMA) Section Results from APLFControl (HMA) Section Results from APLF
0 Runs at high temperature
2 3 4 5 6
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
Control Section 97°F Surface, 90°F Bottom 0 Runs
Deep LVDT Shallow LVDT
Def
lect
ion,
inch
Time, seconds
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 31
Control (HMA) Section Results from APLFControl (HMA) Section Results from APLF
0 Runs at high temperature
1 2 3 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Control Section 97°F Surface, 90°F Bottom 0 Runs
Pressure Cell
Pres
sure
, psi
Time, seconds
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 32
Control (HMA) Section Results from APLFControl (HMA) Section Results from APLF
After 10,000 Runs at high temperature
1 2 3 4 5
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Control Section 105°F Surface 10,000 Runs
Longitudinal Strain Transverse Strain
Mic
rost
rain
Time, seconds
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 33
Control (HMA) Section Results from APLFControl (HMA) Section Results from APLF
After 10,000 Runs at high temperature
2 3 4 5 6
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
Control Section 105°F Surface 10,000 Runs
Deep LVDT Shallow LVDT
Def
lect
ion,
inch
Time, seconds
Ohio University - Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment 34
Control (HMA) Section Results from APLFControl (HMA) Section Results from APLF
After 10,000 Runs at high temperature
1 2 3 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Control Section 105°F Surface 10,000 Runs
Pressure Cell
Pre
ssur
e, p
si
Time, seconds
Shad M. Sargand, Russ ProfessorDept. of Civil Engineering Ohio UniversityOhio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment (ORITE)
In cooperation withProfs. J. Ludwig Figueroa and Sang-Soo Kim
http://webce.ent.ohiou.edu/orite/