Wall Lake Man Accused of Probation Violation

8/12/2019 Wall Lake Man Accused of Probation Violation

1/63


2/63


3/63


4/63


5/63


6/63


7/63


8/63


9/63


10/63


11/63


12/63


13/63


14/63


15/63


16/63


17/63


18/63


19/63


20/63


21/63


22/63


23/63


24/63


25/63


26/63

In The Iowa District Court for the SecondJudicialDistrictInre the conversion ofpaperfiles AdministrativeOrderto electric documents

Iowa Court Rule 16.102 authorizes achiefjudge to order the conversionofpapercourt files to anelectronicfileofanycasenot subject to the Rules Pertaining to the Use oftheElectronicDocumentManagement System EDMS) . It is in thebestinterest ofal lforthe Court to haveaccessvi aEDMSto pendfilesthatexist at the time a county clerk of courtofficeimplements EDMS . Accordingly:It is so Orderedthat:

1. EachClerkof Court maytakeaction to convertpaper casefilesthatare pending andw i ll likelyappearon a future court schedule as soon as implementationofEDMSbegins in their respectivecounties.2. TheClerkshall work with the localCourt toidentifyspecificdocumentsthatare to be scanned ineachcasetype. Uponimplementation ofelectronic filingin theCounty,the securityleveloftheseelectronic records shall be asidentifiedby theEDMSBusinessAdvisoryCommittee.

3. TheClerkshall send theNoticeRegardingElectronicFilingto theattorneysand partiesappearing pro se.

4. Oncenotified,counselofrecord or parties appearing pro se shall apply the rules pertaining toprotection ofpersonal privacy IowaCt.R.16.602through 16.607) to all futurefilingsinthatcase.

5. Afterbeingnotifiedof commencement ofthe electronic filinginthatCounty, attorneys, partiesappearing pro se and all other shallfileall futurefilingsonthatcaseelectronically.

It is so Ordered:Dated 3rd dayo fNovember, 2010

/s/Kurt L .WilkeKurtL . Wilke,ChiefJudge of the SecoJudicialDistrictof Iowa


27/63

In the Iowa District Court in and for SAC County

Case No: 02811 OWCR012172 Title: STATE VS BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER

NOTICE REGARDING ELECTRONIC FILINGThis case has been converted to an electronic case by Order of the Court.

New rules apply to electronically filed cases.

Because your case has been converted to an electronic case, it is now governed by Chapter 16 Rules Pertaining

to the Use of the Electronic Document Management System.What is required of you?You must register to use the Electronic Document Management System (EDMS).

If you haven't already registered, please log on to the Iowa Judicial Branch eFiling website at

https://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/EFile to register.You are required to have a current e-mail account for use with EDMS. Registration requires you to understand

and agree to comply with the rules that govern electronic filing, contained the Chapter 16 Rules Pertaining to

the use of the Electronic Document Management System,available on the Iowa Judicial Branch eFiling website.

Your registration constitutes your request for, and consent to, electronic service of court-generated documents

and documents filed electronically by other parties. When you have completed your registration, you can begin

filing and viewing documents on your case and receiving notifications of filings, and events.EXCEPTIONS: For good cause, the court may authorize you to submit a document in paper. Upon showing of

exceptional circumstances, the chief judge of the district in which a case is pending may grant you an exemption

from registering and filing electronically.You must protect private information when using EDMS.

Division VI of Chapter 16 Rules Pertaining to the Use of the Electronic Document Management System

specifies personal information that is now considered protected by the court, as well as what you must do to

keep protected personal information out of the public documents you eFile.Training and technical support are available for EDMS.

Technical support for the Iowa Judicial Branch eFiling website is available at 1-877-369-8324. If you have

questions about court procedures related to electronic filing, contact your county clerk of court office.We look forward to your comments and suggestions

as we implement electronic filings in the Iowa Courts

E-FILED 2013 MAR 05 9:42 AM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


28/63

In The Iowa District Court for the Second Judicial DistrictIn re the conversion of paper files

to electric documents

Administrative Order

Iowa Court Rule 16.102 authorizes a chief judge to order the conversion of paper court files to an

electronic file of any case not subject to the Rules Pertaining to the Use of the Electronic Document

Management System (EDMS). It is in the best interest of all for the Court to have access via EDMS to pending

files that exist at the time a county clerk of court office implements EDMS. Accordingly:It is so Ordered that:

1. Each Clerk of Court may take action to convert paper case files that are pending and will likely

appear on a future court schedule as soon as implementation of EDMS begins in their respective counties.

2. The Clerk shall work with the local Court to identify specific documents that are to be scanned in

each case type. Upon implementation of electronic filing in the County, the security level of

these electronic records shall be as identified by the EDMS Business Advisory Committee.

3. The Clerk shall send the Notice Regarding Electronic Filing to the attorneys and parties

appearing pro se.

4. Once notified, counsel of record or parties appearing pro se shall apply the rules pertaining to

protection of personal privacy (Iowa Ct.R.16.602 through 16.607) to all future filings in that

case.

5. After being notified of commencement of the electronic filing in that County, attorneys, parties appearing pro se and all other shall file all future filings on that case electronically.It is so Ordered:Dated 3rd day of November, 2010

/s/ Kurt L. Wilke

Kurt L. Wilke, Chief Judge of the Second

Judicial District of Iowa



29/63

Case ID : 02811 OWCR012172 - STATE VS BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER

Event Cd : NOOT

BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER filed

BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER filed

BENJAMIN JOHN SMITH filed

BENJAMIN JOHN SMITH filed



30/63

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SAC COUNTY

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER,

Defendant.

Case No. OWCR012172

APPLICATION TO REVOKEDEFERRED JUDGMENT ANDPRONOUNCE JUDGMENT ANDSENTENCE

COMES NOW, the State of Iowa, through Ben Smith, Sac County Attorney, and in

support of his Application to Revoke Deferred Judgment and Pronounce Judgment and

Sentence, states to the Court the following:

1. On July 31, 2012, the Court entered an order deferring judgment on defendants

conviction (guilty plea) to OWI First Offense, a Serious Misdemeanor.

2. As part of said guilty plea and deferred judgment, defendant was placed on

probation for a period of one year, said probation period to end on December 14, 2013.

Said probation included the condition that defendant have no violations of the law.

3. On March 1, 2013 defendant was charged with Possession of Marijuana with

intent to deliver, a class D felony in violation of Iowa Code section 124.401(1)(d) (Sac

County District Court Case No. FECR012274)

4. By the very nature of defendants new charges, defendant has violated the terms

and conditions of his probation and deferred judgment.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned respectfully requests that the deferred judgment be

revoked and a sentencing hearing be set, and for such other relief as may be justified in

these circumstances.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Benjamin John Smith

Sac County Attorney, Benjamin John SmithAT0008834Sac County Courthouse100 NW State St., Suite 9Sac City IA 50583

Telephone: 712-662-4791Fax: 712-662-4123

Email: [email protected]

E-FILED 2013 MAR 05 1:58 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


31/63


STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

v.


Defendant.

Cae N!. OWCR"#$#%$

ORDER SETTIN& HEARIN& ONSTATE'S APP(ICATION TO RE)OKEDEFERRED *UD&MENT ANDPRONOUNCE *UD&MENT ANDSENTENCE

BE IT REMEMBERED t+at !n t+e el!- date, t+e a!veentitled /atte0 1a/e ef!0e

t+e C!20t !n t+e State' a33li1ati!n t! 0ev!4e defe00ed 52d6/ent and 30!n!2n1e

52d6/ent and enten1e 78State' a33li1ati!n9:. T+e C!20t, 23!n 0evie-in6 t+e 0e1!0d,

ta4in6 52di1ial n!ti1e !f Sa1 C!2nt; Dit0i1t Cae N!. FECR"#$$%


32/63

State of Iowa Courts

Type: ORDER SETTING HEARING

Case Number Case Title

OWCR012172 STATE VS BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER

So Ordered

Electronically signed on 2013-03-06 11:27:33 page 2 of 2



33/63

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR SAC COUNTY

STATE OF IOWA,

PLAINTIFF,VS.BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER ,

DEFENDANT.

02811 OWCR012172

ORDER RE:APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT

OF COUNSEL

The defendant has made application for appointment of counsel at public expense.

Based upon the information provided by the defendant, the Court finds as follows:The Defendant has income between 125%25 and 200%25 of the guidelines, not appointing wouldcause financial hardship.

Attorney Charles Schulte, a contract attorney, is appointed.

1 of 2



34/63


Case Number Case TitleOWCR012172 STATE VS BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER

Type: ORDER APPOINTING

So Ordered

Electronically signed on 2013-03-20 14:57:49

2 of 2



35/63


THE STATE OF IOWA, )

Plaintiff ) OWCR 12172)

Vs. ) MOTION TO WITHDRAW) AS COUNSELBRYSON MARTIN KRAMER )

Defendant

______________________

COMES NOW Charles A. Schulte and having been appointed to represent the

defendant in this matter, hereby moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the reasonthat he has previously been appointed to represent a co-defendant in a related matter.

Respectfully submitted,

/S/ Charles A. Schulte AT0007137

SCHULTE & GRAVEN LAW FIRM P.C.

421 Main St., P.O. Box 394Sac City, IA 50583

(712) 662-4715

FAX: (712 662-4884



36/63

2RCR14


STATE OF IOWA,

PLAINTIFF,

vs.

BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER ,

DEFENDANT.

Case No. 02811 OWCR012172

O R D E R

Attorney Charles Schulte has filed a motion to withdraw. Good cause for the

requested withdrawal exists.

IT IS, THERFORE, THE ORDER OF THE COURT as follows:

1. The motion to withdraw is granted, and Charles Schulte shall have no further

responsibility in this case.

2. Attorney Sarah Smith is appointed as substitute counsel in this case.

CLERK TO FURNISH COPIES TO:

County Attorney

Charles Schulte, Esq.

Sarah Smith, Esq.

Defendant

District Court Administrator

1 of 2



37/63


Case Number Case TitleOWCR012172 STATE VS BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER

Type: OTHER ORDER

So Ordered


2 of 2



38/63



39/63


______________________________________________________________________________

STATE OF IOWA, )

Plaintiff, ) No. OWCR01212

)

!".)

#RYSON $ARTIN %RA$ER, ORDER

)

D&f&n'ant.___________________________________________________________________________

NOW ON t(& 'at& in'iat&' *&lo+, Atton&- Saa( . S/it(" $otion to Wit('a+

o/&" *&fo& t(& Cot. Aft& &!i&+ of t(& fil&, it a&a" t(at t(i" $otion "(ol' *& 3ant&'.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED t(at Atton&- Saa( . S/it( i" &/itt&' to +it('a+ in

t(& a*o!&4&f&&n&' /att& an' "(all (a!& no ft(& o*li3ation" in t(i" a"&.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t(at P&t& 5ol'"/it( *& aoint&' a" "*"titt& on"&l fo

t(& D&f&n'ant in t(i" /att&, &ff&ti!& t(& fi"t 'at& of "&!i&.

Coi&" to6

Con"&l of R&o'

Cot A'/ini"tation

E-FILED 2013 APR 01 11:17 AM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


40/63


Type: WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL



So Ordered




41/63


STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

v.


Defendant.

Case No. OWCR0!"!

SRCR0!0#

ORDER RESCHEDU$IN% HEARIN% ONSTATE&S APP$ICATION TO RE'O(EDEFENDANT&S PRO)ATION

)E IT RE*E*)ERED t+at on A-il ! !0, t+e a/oveentitled 1atte- 2a1e /efo-e

t+e Co3-t fo- a +ea-in4 on t+e State&s ali2ation to -evo5e defendant&s -o/ation. Sa2

Co3nt6 Atto-ne6 )en S1it+ -e-esented t+e State of Io7a. Atto-ne6 Pete- %olds1it+

aea-ed on defendant&s /e+alf, e- a +one 2onve-sation 7it+ Co3nt6 Atto-ne6 S1it+.

T+e Co3-t, 3on t+e a-ties 8oint -e93est fo- t+e 1atte- to /e -es2+ed3led, afte-

-evie7in4 t+e -e2o-d and /ein4 advised in t+e -e1ises, FINDS t+e +ea-in4 s+o3ld /e

-es2+ed3led.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED t+at t+e +ea-in4 on t+e State&s ali2ation to -evo5e

defendant&s -o/ation s+all /e and is -es2+ed3led to June 18, 2013, 2o11en2in4 at

1:30 p.m.in t+e 2o3-t-oo1 of t+e Sa2 Co3nt6 Co3-t+o3se, Sa2 Cit6, Io7a. If Defendant

fails to aea- /efo-e t+e Co3-t on t+e a/ovedate, a 7a--ant 1a6 iss3e fo- +is a--est.

Original filed, copies to:

County Attorney

Defendants Attorney, Peter Goldsmith



42/63


Type: ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE


SRCR012106 STATE VS BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER


So Ordered




43/63

E-FILED 2013 JUN 11 2:47 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


44/63



45/63


STATE OF IOWA, *PLAINTIFF, * CRIMINAL NO. OWCR012172 and

* SRCR012106

v. ** ORDER !RANTIN! MOTION

"RYSON MARTIN #RAMER * TO CONTINUE

DEFENDANT. ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

T$% &a''() +&( (-+)( '$( C+)' /+n '$( D(-(ndan' M+'%+n -+) C+n'%nan( -%(d

$()(%n and '$( C+)' (%n d3 adv%(d %n '$( /)(&%( -%nd4

T$a' ++d a( (5%' -+) +n'%nan( +- '$% &a''() d( '+ '$( -a' '$a' '$( D(-(ndan' %

( +' +- '+n -+) $% (&/+3&(n'.

T$a' a $+)' +n'%nan( +- '$% &a''() % n+' (+/a)d%8( an3 +- '$( /a)'%(.

THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED '$a' '$( /)+a'%+n )(v+a'%+n $(a)%n %n '$% a( (

+n'%n(d '+ 93 2, 201: a' 14:0 /.&.



46/63


Type: ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE




So Ordered




47/63

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SACCOUNTYhttp://icis.jb.gov.state.ia.us/icis2pilot3/CJINShowJudgeQueueDetail.do?queueIteID!2"#$%&'show(llCases!t)ue'queueNae!*)de)s'+)o,ve-t!+alse

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

v.


Defendant.

Cae N!. OWCR"#$#%$

SRCR"#$#"&

ORDER SETTIN' HEARIN' ONSTATE(S APP)ICATION TORE*OKE DEFENDANT(SPROBATION

T+i ae a-e ef!/e t+e C!0/t !n t+e 1a/tie /e20et f!/ an !/de/ ettin3

+ea/in3 !n t+e State( a11liati!n t! /ev!4e defendant( 1/!ati!n +e/ein. T+e

C!0/t, afte/ /evie5in3 t+e /e!/d and ein3 advied in t+e 1/e-ie FINDS and

ORDERS a +ea/in3 !n t+e State( a11liati!n +all e and i +ed0led f!/ July30, 2013, at1:00 p.m. in t+e !0/t/!!- at t+e Sa C!0nt6 C!0/t+!0e, Sa Cit6,

I!5a 7"789.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED if t+e defendant fail t! 1e/!nall6 a11ea/ ef!/e

t+i C!0/t at t+e a!ve:+ed0led date and ti-e, a en+ 5a//ant -a6 i0e f!/

defendant( a//et.

E-FILED 2013 JUL 18 1:42 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
http://icis.jb.gov.state.ia.us/icis2pilot3/CJINShowJudgeQueueDetail.do?queueItemID=289564&showAllCases=true&queueName=Orders&fromEvent=falsehttp://icis.jb.gov.state.ia.us/icis2pilot3/CJINShowJudgeQueueDetail.do?queueItemID=289564&showAllCases=true&queueName=Orders&fromEvent=falsehttp://icis.jb.gov.state.ia.us/icis2pilot3/CJINShowJudgeQueueDetail.do?queueItemID=289564&showAllCases=true&queueName=Orders&fromEvent=falsehttp://icis.jb.gov.state.ia.us/icis2pilot3/CJINShowJudgeQueueDetail.do?queueItemID=289564&showAllCases=true&queueName=Orders&fromEvent=falsehttp://icis.jb.gov.state.ia.us/icis2pilot3/CJINShowJudgeQueueDetail.do?queueItemID=289564&showAllCases=true&queueName=Orders&fromEvent=false


48/63


Type: OTHER ORDER




So Ordered


E-FILED 2013 JUL 18 1:42 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


49/63


STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

v.


Defendant.

Cae N!. OWCR"#$#%$

SRCR"#$#"&

ORDER RESCHEDU'IN( HEARIN(ON STATE)S APP'ICATION TORE*OKE DEFENDANT)S PROBATION


+ea/in3 !n t+e State) a11liati!n t! /ev!4e defendant) 1/!ati!n +e/ein. T+e C!0/t,

afte/ /evie5in3 t+e /e!/d and ein3 advied in t+e 1/e-ie FINDS and ORDERS a

+ea/in3 !n t+e State) a11liati!n +all e and i +ed0led f!/ Se1te-e/ #", $"#6,

at #"7"" a.-. in t+e !0/t/!!- at t+e Sa C!0nt8 C!0/t+!0e, Sa Cit8, I!5a 9"9:6.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED if t+e defendant fail t! 1e/!nall8 a11ea/ ef!/e t+i

C!0/t at t+e a!ve;+ed0led date and ti-e, a en+ 5a//ant -a8 i0e f!/

defendant) a//et.

E-FILED 2013 AUG 01 1:32 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


50/63


Type: OTHER ORDER



So Ordered


E-FILED 2013 AUG 01 1:32 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


51/63


STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

v.


Defendant.

Cae N!. OWCR"#$#%$

SRCR"#$#"&



+ea/in3 !n t+e State) a11liati!n t! /ev!4e defendant) 1/!ati!n +e/ein. T+e C!0/t,

afte/ /evie5in3 t+e /e!/d and ein3 advied in t+e 1/e-ie FINDS and ORDERS a

+ea/in3 !n t+e State) a11liati!n +all e and i +ed0led f!/ Se1te-e/ #", $"#6,

at #"76" a.-. in t+e !0/t/!!- at t+e Sa C!0nt8 C!0/t+!0e, Sa Cit8, I!5a

9"9:6.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED if t+e defendant fail t! 1e/!nall8 a11ea/ ef!/e t+i

C!0/t at t+e a!ve;+ed0led date and ti-e, a en+ 5a//ant -a8 i0e f!/

defendant) a//et.

E-FILED 2013 AUG 02 9:48 AM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


52/63


Type: OTHER ORDER




So Ordered


E-FILED 2013 AUG 02 9:48 AM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


53/63


STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

v.


Defendant.

Cae N!. OWCR"#$#%$

SRCR"#$#"&


T+i atte- ae /ef!-e t+e C!0-t !n Se1te/e- #", $"#2. T+e C!0-t, 01!n

-evie3in4 t+e -e!-d and /ein4 advied in t+e 1-eie, FINDS t+at t+e C!0nt5

Att!-ne5 inf!-ed t+e C!0-t t+e 1a-tie +ave a tentative 1lea a4-eeent !ne-nin4

t+ee -ev!ati!n 1-!eedin4.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED t+at t+e -ev!ati!n 1-!eedin4 +all /e and a-e-e+ed0led t! Ot!/e- $#, $"#2, at 672" a.. in t+e !0-t-!! at t+e Sa C!0nt5

C!0-t+!0e, Sa Cit5, I!3a 8"892.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED if t+e defendant fail t! 1e-!nall5 a11ea- /ef!-e t+i

C!0-t at t+e a/!ve:+ed0led date and tie, a /en+ 3a--ant a5 i0e f!-

defendant) a--et.

E-FILED 2013 SEP 10 3:45 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


54/63


Type: OTHER ORDER




So Ordered


E-FILED 2013 SEP 10 3:45 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


55/63


STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

v.


Defendant.

Case Nos. OWCR0!"!

ORDER RE#O$IN% DEFERRED

&UD%'ENT AND PRONOUNCIN%SENTENCE

T(is )ase )a*e +efoe t(e Co-t fo t(e Co-ts a//oval of t(e /aties sti/-lated

ode evoin1 defendants defeed 2-d1*ent and /ono-n)in1 senten)e, t(e te*s

and )onditions of 3(i)( ae set fot( +elo3. T(e State a//eas in t(is *atte +4 Sa)

Co-nt4 Attone4 5en S*it(. T(e defendant a//eas t(o-1( (is attone4, Pete

%olds*it(. T(e Co-t, -/on evie3in1 t(e e)od, -/on t(e /aties a1ee*ent, and

+ein1 advised in t(e /e*ises, FINDS t(e /aties a1ee, and t(e Co-t finds t(at t(e

defendant violated t(e te*s and t(e )onditions of (is defeed 2-d1*ent inOWCR0!"!.

IT IS THEREFORE THE &UD%'ENT AND SENTENCE OF THE COURT,/-s-ant to Se)tions 6!&.!, and 706., Code of Io3a, t(at t(e Defendant +esenten)ed to8

. T(e )onfine*ent in t(e Sa) Co-nt4 &ail fo a /eiod of t(it49:60; da4s, all

ti*e s-s/ended afte defendant (as seved t3o :!; da4s in t(e Sa) Co-nt4 &ail,

3it( )edit fo ti*e seved.

!. T(e a+ove 2ail senten)e s(all +e seved in .

6. T(e defendant s(all seve t(e a+ove 2ail senten)e 3it(in si? :>; *ont(s of

t(e &-d1*ent ent4 date. If t(e defendant (as not seved said 2ail ti*e at t(e end

of si? :>; *ont(s, t(e Sa) Co-nt4 S(eiff is odeed at (is )onvenien)e, to /i)

-/ defendant to seve said 2ail ti*e. T(e defendant s(all also +e assessed t(e

)oe)tional fee of @.00 /e da4 )(a1ed +4 t(e Sa) Co-nt4 S(eiffs Offi)e.


56/63

>. T(e defendant is /la)ed on /o+ation to t(e Sa) Co-nt4 Po+ation Offi)e

fo a /eiod of one 4ea, and d-in1 s-)( /o+ation /eiod defendant s(all a+ide

+4 all t(e te*s and )onditions of t(e /o+ation as set fot( on t(e Po+ation

A1ee*ent /evio-sl4 enteed on O)to+e 7, !0!. F-t(e, t(e d-ation of

/o+ation is e?tended fo one 4ea fo* t(e date of t(is &-d1*ent Ent4.

a. T(e defendant s(all o+e4 all State, Fedeal, and lo)al la3s and

odinan)es.

+. T(e defendant is Odeed to e/ot an4 ne3 aests to t(e Sa) Co-nt4

Po+ation Offi)e 3it(in seven da4s of t(e aest date.

). T(e defendant s(all a+stain fo* t(e -se of illi)it d-1s d-in1 (is

/o+ationa4 /eiod.

d. T(e defendant s(all ti*el4 /a4 all a*o-nts odeed +4 t(is &-d1*ent.

". T(e defendant is Odeed to /a4 a fine of @,!0.00 and a 6 s-)(a1e

in t(e a*o-nt of @, and FECR0!!"


57/63

/a4 estit-tion of fees, in)l-din1 e?/ense of a /-+li) defende. T(e defendant

s(all *ae estit-tion fo )o-t a//ointed attone4 fees in t(e a*o-nt a//oved

+4 t(e State P-+li) Defendes Offi)e.

. T(e defendant s(all ee/ t(e Cle of Co-t and Sa) Co-nt4 Po+ation

notified as to an4 )(an1e in addess -ntil all o+li1ations of t(is )ase (ave +een

)o*/leted.

!. If t(e defendants li)ense (as not alead4 +een evoed fo t(is offense,

t(e De/at*ent of Tans/otation s(all evoe defendants li)ense /-s-ant to

Io3a Code C(a/te 6!&.

6. T(e defendant s(all /a4 all a*o-nts odeed +4 t(is &-d1*ent +4 /a4in1

!0"00 /e *ont( fo t(is )ase, FECR0!!"< and SRCR0!0> to t(e Sa)

Co-nt4 Cle of Co-t 3it( /a4*ents to +e1in on t(e t( da4 of t(e *ont(

follo3in1 t(is ode and s(all )ontin-e on t(e 1!t#$%& of ea)( *ont( -ntil /aid in

f-ll. HOWE#ER IF THE A5O#E PAY'ENT PBAN DOES NOT RESUBT IN THE

TOTAB O5BI%ATIONS 5EIN% PAID WITHIN !< 'ONTHS OF THE DATE OFTHIS &UD%'ENT, THE 5ABANCE IS DUE AT THAT TI'E. THE defendant is

advised t(at if one /a4*ent is *issed, t(e entie o+li1ation +e)o*es i**ediatel4

d-e.

0.00.

E-FILED 2013 NOV 13 9:57 AM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


58/63


Type: ORDER FOR JUDGMENT



So Ordered


E-FILED 2013 NOV 13 9:57 AM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


59/63


STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER

Defendant.

CASE Nos. FECR012274,

OWCR012172

STATES APPLICATION TO REVOKE

DEFENDANTS PROBATION AND

IMPOSE SENTENCE

COMES NOW the State of Iowa and for its Application to Revoke Defendants

Deferred Judgment and Impose Sentence states the following:

1. On or about November 11, 2013, in Sac County Case No. FECR012274,

defendant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance second offenseand was placed on probation for one year.

2. Also on November 11, 2013, defendants deferred judgment in Sac

County Case No. OWCR012172 was revoked and defendant was placed on

probation for one year.

3. On February 21, 2014, defendant was charged with possession of drug

paraphernalia - Boone County Case No. OGSMCR108923.

4. By the very nature of defendants new charges, defendant has violated the

terms and conditions of his probation.

WHEREFORE, the State respectfully requests the Court set a hearing on this

Application and revoke Defendants probation and, after the State establishes

Defendants violations by a preponderance of the evidence, impose sentence

pursuant to Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.24(3)(d).

__________________________

Benjamin John SmithSac County AttorneySac County Courthouse100 NW State St., Suite 9Sac City IA 50583Telephone: 712-662-4791Email: [email protected]

E-FILED 2014 FEB 27 12:55 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT


60/63


STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BRYSON MARTIN KRAMER ,

Defendant.

02811 OWCR012172

Order Setting Initial AppearanceOn Probation Violation

IT IS HEREBY ORERED that an initial appearance on the State's Application for ProbationRevocation will be held as follows:Initial Appearance is scheduled on 03/19/2014 at 9:00 AM at the Sac Co. Courthouse, 100 NW StateSt., Sac City, Iowa.This order and a copy of the Application for Revocation of Probation shall be served on the defendant

in the manner of an original notice.

1 of 2



61/63


Case Number Case TitleOWCR012172 STATE VS BRYSON MARTIN KRAMERType: ORDER SETTING INITIAL APPEARANCE

So Ordered


2 of 2



62/63



63/63


Documents

Wall Lake Man Accused of Probation Violation