100
PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT For The Site of The Proposed Waterford at Fairway Village Project 2911 S. E Village Loop Vancouver, Washington 98683 EIS Job No. 2010041 Prepared for: TOlJchmark Development & Construction 5150 S. W. Griffith Drive Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Prepared by: Environmental Inspection Services 11981 Fargo Road Aurora, Oregon 97002 (503) 678-5063 EMAIL: [email protected] ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION SERVICES Charles . Spear, Partner egistered Environmental Assessor (REA-01241) May 17, 2010

WAFV Bare Land Phase 1 Environmental 5-2010

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

WAFV Phase I Environmental Report

Citation preview

PHASE1ENVIRONMENTALSITEASSESSMENT For TheSiteofTheProposedWaterfordatFairwayVillageProject 2911 S.EVillageLoop Vancouver,Washington98683 EISJobNo.2010041 Preparedfor: TOlJchmarkDevelopment &Construction 5150S.W. GriffithDrive Beaverton,Oregon97005 Preparedby: EnvironmentalInspectionServices 11981FargoRoad Aurora,Oregon97002 (503) 678-5063 EMAIL:[email protected] ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION SERVICES Charles.Spear,Partner egisteredEnvironmentalAssessor(REA-01241) May17,2010 TABLEOFCONTENTS DESCRIPTIONPAGENO. EXECUTIVESUMMARy....................................................................1-3 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................4-6 SITERECONNAISSANCE6-7 PUBICRECORDS8 SITEDESCRIPTION/HISTORICALUSAGE....................................9 ADJOININGPROPERTYUSAGE10 DATABASES.......................................................................................11-13 ENVIRONMENTALCONDITIONS.......................................................14-16 NON-POINTSOURCEPOLLUTIONSOURCES17-19 ASBESTOS/LEAD-BASEDPAINT/RADON20 AIRPOLLUTION21 RISK ASSESSMENT/RECOMMENDATIONS22 LIMITATIONS,23 APPENDIX1.0PLATES GENERALIZEDSITEMAPPLATEP-l SITEASSESSORSMAP.............................................................PLATEP- 2 SITEVICINITYMAPPLATE 1955AERIALPHOTOGRAPH.................................................PLATEP-S P-3 SITETOPOGRAPHICMAP.............................................PLATEP-4 1964AERIALPHOTOGRAPHPLATEP-6 1984AERIALPHOTOGRAPHPLATEP-7 1994AERIALPHOTOGRAPHPLATEP-8 2007AERIALPHOTOGRAPHPLATEP-9 COLORPHOTOGRAPHSPLATENO.P-10 APPENDIX2.0 SITEDATA APPENDIX3.0 ENVIRONMENTALDATABASES APPENDIX3.0 CONSULTANTRESUME ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION SERVICES Bus:503.678.5063 Cell503.680.6398 Fax:503.6785063 11981FargoRoad.NE Aurora,OR 97002 [email protected] \!Jay17,2010 EISJOBNo.2010041 TouchmarkDevelopment &ConstructIon 5150S,W.GriffithDrive Beaverton,Oregon97005 REE\CcutlveSummary of Report No.2010041PhaseIEnvironmentalSlteAssessmentfor TheSiteof TheProposedWaterfordAtFairway ViLlageprojectat2911SE.VlllagcLoop 111Vancouver,Washington 98682 Dear'TouchmarkDevelopmentand Construction, Thisreportpresentstheresultsof anASTM&AAIpmceduralPhaseIEnvironmentalSite Assessment conductedattheabovereferenced environmentally non-problematic,undeveloped, andpartIally \-voodedparcel of landlocated atthenorthwest corner of theintersectionof S.E, 1641h AvenueandS.E.Village LoopinVancouver,Washington.The environmentalsite assessmentwasperformedbyCharlesA.Spear,ASTMcertifiedfieldrepresentative of Fll\ironmcnlalInspectionServlces (EIS),onTuesday,May 4,2010.NoRecognizedConditJons of El1\ironmcntalImpairment (ReEl) were observedon-site. NoRecognizedEnvironmental Conditions (REC's) werenotedat the subect property and noadditional environmental studiesare recommendedat the subject property at thistime. I declarethat,tothebest of myprofessional knowledge andbelief, Imeet the definition of En\'ironmentalProfessionalasdefinedin312.10 of thispart (40CFR Part 312)." Ihavethe specificqualificationsbasedoneducation,training, andexperience toassessa property of thenature,history, andsetting of the subject property. Ihave developedand performedthe allappropriate inquiriesinconformance withthe standards andpractices set forthin40 CFR Part 312." InOUl'Opll1l0n,basedonareVlewoCavailable siterecords;areviewof previous environmentally non-problematicsite agriculturalapplications; anexamillation of preparedenvironmental databaseI-eports,currentPhaseI studies;andsitereconnaissancedata,thepOSSibilitIesof chemicalcontam1l1ationof thesubject propertyareminimal. Page-1-EnVironmentalSite AssessmentsEnvironmental Audits/InspectionsUndergroundStorageTankWetlands/SiteRemediationAHERA AsbestosSurveys Norecognizedconditions of current or historicalenvironmentalimpainnent fromchemical hazZlrdousmaterials,substances,or wastereleases,emissions,dumping,accumulations,or dischargcswerenotedforthesubject property during thesiteinspection.Nochemically distressedvegetationorpetroleumstall1edsalls were observed on-site.0active or inactive regulatedornon-regulatedundergroundtankswereobservedon-site.Norelatedunderground storagetankappurtenancessuchasfilll'isers,ventrisers,fuelpumps, groundwatermonitoring wells,fuelpump canopies or fuelingservice bayswere observedon-site. 1\0Recogni7.edEnvironmentalConditions (REC's) were observedat the subject property.No non-scopeREC'ssuchasradon,vaporintrusionconditions,PCB's, wetlands,aquifer recharge areas,geologIChazardconditions,vaporintnlsion conditions,asbestosorlead-basedpaint materialswere observedon-site. Noconditions of environmentalimpairment fromthegeneration,releases, discharges, accumulationsor dumping of hazardousmaterialsor waste were notedatthesubject property at thelIme of thesiteassessment.The subjectproperty isnotlistedon available stateandfederal en\ Ironmentalregulatory databasestoinclude The WDOE UST database;TheFederalFINDS database;TheWDOELUSTdatabase;andMANIFEST,HSIS,RCRA-CESQG andFINDS databases.NoenvIronmentalregulatorylisting concernswere notedatthetime of thesite assessment. Theenvl)"onmentalassessment alsoincludedanexaminationof City of Vancouver permits and repons:o\\nershlprecords:examinationof propertyutilitiesandamenities.lnterviewsWith kno\\leJge3bleIndiViduals,anexaminationof thesubject property groundsareas:anall appropriatereviewof avaIlable siterecords;andanassessment of other contiguoussubjectand adjolJ1l11gpropeJ1ies.Thesubjectproperty,adjoining properties,sitevicinity,andother site detailsareshownbya seriesof plates, drawings,andaerialphotographsinAppendix1.0 of thIS repOI1. Sources of lt1formatlonwerereviewedandactivitieswereperfoll11edinorder toidentify potential sourCi.:Sof regulatedorhazardousmaterialsatthesubjectpropertySuchenvironmentallawsand regulationsastheComprehensiveEnVironmentalResponse,CompensationandLiabilityActof 1980(CERCLA),theResourceConservation andRecovery Act (RCRA),theSohdWaste DisposalAct,andtheToxic SubstancesControl Act(TSCA)were reviewedandappliedtothe subjectpropeliy.Compliance withthese regulations was establishedatthetime of the site inspectionbasedonavailable data. Page-2Thefollowing reasonably attall1able andpublically reviewable data was examinedforthe subject property: ( I .())Recordedcham of title documents (deeds, easements,leases,restrictions,andcovenants); (20) Aerialphotographsreflecting prIorusageandwhich arereasonably obtall1ablethrough state or localgovernmentalagencies; (3.0)Determination of theexistence of environmentalcleanup liensagainsttheproperty which havearisenpursuant tofederal,state,andlocallaws; (40) Reasonably obtalllablcfederal,state,orlocalgovernmentalrecordsof siteswheretherehas beenareleaseof hazardoussubstances,andwhicharelikely tocause or contributeto