Upload
sabina-chapman
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Von Thunen
AP HUG March 2015http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/46602078/ns/today-today_people/t/doomsday-vault-holds-seeds-could-save-world/#slice-1
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/02/photogalleries/seedvault-pictures/index.html
WHY DO FARMERS FACE ECONOMIC DIFFICULTIES?
Challenges for commercial farmers• Access to markets is important
The von Thünen model (1826)• The choice of crop to grow is related to the proximity to
the market
WHY DO FARMERS FACE ECONOMIC DIFFICULTIES?
Challenges for commercial farmers• Overproduction
Agricultural efficiencies have resulted in overproduction
Demand has remained relatively constant• As a consequence, incomes for farmers are low
Sustainable agriculture• Sensitive land management
• Ridge Tillage (lowering production $$, greater soil conservation)
• Limited use of chemicals (application of limited if any herbicides to control weeds, no Roundup-Ready)
• Integrated crop and livestock
WHY DO FARMERS FACE ECONOMIC DIFFICULTIES?
Overview of von Thunen
Locational Rent
The term rent has several meanings…• You may think of it as contract rent or money
paid for land or other property.
To understand von Thunen’s model think of locational rent as MONEY MADE!
There is just one problem…
In the real world things don’t always happen as
they are predicted in models!
VON THUNEN ASSUMPTIONS
1. There is a single market place with no connections; his theory was called the isolated state. Is this a likely real life situation?
2. Isotropic surface 3. Uniform labor costs 4. Transportation equally possible in all directions 5. Transportation costs are directly related to
distance 6. Farmers are rational and opt for those types of
agriculture that produce the greatest locational rent
AS DISTANCE TO MARKET INCREASES:
1. Production costs remain constant. 2.Transportation costs increase 3. Locational rent decreases.
Transportation costs and Locational rent are inversely related - one goes up as the other goes down. It's because the transport costs eat into the locational rent.
Graphically, the greater the distance between the farm and the central market/city, the lower the rent
Note that this theory of differential rent does not assume that land varies by quality
Distance, d
Rent
Thünen also showed that if transportation cost t decreases, fields that are farther off would be brought into cultivation: another testable hypothesis Distance, d
Rent
One good case [P – (t × d)] × MPL = w
L
MPL
[P-(t × df)] × MPL
[P-(t × dn)] × MPL
AB
Cw
Quantity of Wheat
LnLf
There are two farms: near (n) and far (f). The near farm hires more workers and earns more in rent. The near farm earns ABC in rent, whereas the far farm earns only BC.
Multiple goods case What if there are
three goods: wheat, corn, and rice?
The three crops will be cultivated in concentric circles around the central market/city—another testable hypothesis.
This was the birth of location economics or geographical economics
Distance, d
Rent
Wheat
Corn
Rice
Wheat Corn Rice
Capital Theory
What is the right time to chop down a tree?
Maximization of land rent income implies that the landowner should follow this rule: • Chop down the tree when the highest
possible Present Value obtainable from the tree = Salvage Price of Tree.
Thünen was analyzing actual problems of forestry when he derived this idea. This an example of the importance of practical problem solving in the progress of economics
WHY DO FARMERS FACE ECONOMIC DIFFICULTIES?
Challenges for subsistence farmers• Population growth• International trade• Drug crops
ONE GOOD CASE
Assume a central marketplace surrounded by agricultural land, all of equal fertility
There is one agricultural good, wheat Landowners hire workers to produce wheat
• L workers make Q(L) units of wheat The cost of transporting wheat to the market is t
dollars per mile• The market price of wheat is P dollars per ton• Therefore, wheat grown d miles away from the market
will earn P – (t × d) dollars per ton
One good case
Revenue earned = [P – (t × d)] × Q(L) Landowners pay each worker the wage w
dollars• Therefore, total wage payment = w × L
Therefore, the landowner’s rent (or, profit) = [P – (t × d)] × Q(L) – w × L
The landowner chooses L to maximize this rent (or, profit)
One good case
Adam Smith had discussed the idea of profit maximization. It was Thünen who expressed the idea as a mathematical problem, solved it using differential calculus, and derived testable hypotheses from profit maximization
One good case
Thünen defined the marginal product of labor MPL as the increase in output Q when labor L increases by one worker
He also assumed diminishing returns• That is, MPL decreases as L increases
He then showed that profit-maximizing landowners will choose L to make [P – (t × d)] × MPL = w
This is the key idea of the marginal productivity theory of distribution
Profit Maximization
How is a firm to decide how much of a resource to use?
Profit maximization implies that the firm should follow this rule: • Marginal Product of a resource = Factor Price
of the resource (measured in units of the produced good).
One good case
When the farm’s distance to the market d is greater, P – (t × d) is smaller
As [P – (t × d)] × MPL = w, MPL must be higher when d is greater
Diminishing MPL then implies that L must be smaller when d is greater
Notice that Thünen has used the idea of profit maximization to derive a testable hypothesis: farms that are farther away from the market will have fewer workers
One good case
Moreover, farms that are farther away from the market will earn lower rent (or, profit)
Why?• They pay more in transport cost t × d and,
therefore, earn a lower price P – (t × d) for wheat