Upload
hari-kirupakar
View
57
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Page 12011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
AerodynamicsAerodynamics and CFD and CFD
at Volvo Car Corporationat Volvo Car Corporation
Johan Ljungberg Johan Ljungberg
[email protected]@volvocars.com
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Page 22011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
Present at the CFD group: 16 employees
Graduated from KTH 2005
Scania AB 2005-2006
Volvo Cars 2006-
Volvo graduate program
www.volvocars.com/intl/top/about/corporate/career/pages/graduate_program.aspx
Page 32011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
OutlineOutline
• Introduction
• CFD process
• Hardware and Software
• Aerodynamics CFD
• Strengths of using CFD
Page 42011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
What is CFDWhat is CFDThe analysis of fluid flow, heat transfer, and other related
phenomena with the aid of advanced numerical techniques,
softwares and computers.
Why CFDWhy CFDUNDERSTANDING complete picture of the flow field at any time
COMPLEMENTS physical testing
Meets the need for REDUCED LEAD TIME
Page 52011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
History of the CFD GroupHistory of the CFD Group1990: Basically 2D computations
1991: 1:st computation of 3D external flow calculation
100000 cells
lead time 3 to 4 months
1993: lead time of 6 weeks
possibility of using CFD in the early stages of car
development
2000: focus becomes model complexity
lead time 8 weeks
2010: lead time for a detailed floor calculation is 4 weeks
60 million cells (2 days for a configuration)
Page 62011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
CAE Groups at VCCCAE Groups at VCC
Computational Fluid DynamicsDurability and NVH
Safety and crash
Powertrain,
Thermodynamics analysis
Combustion Systems
Powertrain,
Thermodynamics analysis
Combustion Systems
Powertrain,
Thermodynamics analysis
Combustion Systems
Durability and NVH
CAE Groups at VCCCAE Groups at VCC
Durability and NVHDurability and NVH
Page 72011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
CLIMATE SYSTEMSCLIMATE SYSTEMSTHERMODYNAMICSTHERMODYNAMICS
CONTAMINATIONCONTAMINATIONAEROACOUSTICSAEROACOUSTICS
Page 82011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
SoftwareSoftware
Preprocessing:
TCE
ANSA
Harpoon
Tgrid (FLUENT)
Pro-am (STAR-CD)
Solver:
FLUENT
Radtherm
Post processing:
Ensight
FLUENT (Cfd-post)
MATLAB
Page 92011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
3) Simplied
TCECAD-Extraction
ANSA
ProAM Wrap
HARPOON
FLUENT
ENSIGHT
CFD ProcessCFD Process
Page 102011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
TCE
CAD-Extraction
ANSA
ProAM Wrap
HARPOON
FLUENT
ENSIGHT
Wrapping of complex
Geometries to get an
air tight geometry
CFD ProcessCFD Process
Page 112011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
TCE
CAD-Extraction
ANSA
ProAM Wrap
HARPOON
FLUENT
ENSIGHT
Pre-work for
wrapping
CFD ProcessCFD Process
Clean Exterior
Page 122011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
TCE
CAD-Extraction
ANSA
ProAM Wrap
HARPOON
FLUENT
ENSIGHT
Octree based
Volume mesher
CFD ProcessCFD Process
Page 132011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
TCE
CAD-Extraction
ANSA
ProAM Wrap
HARPOON
FLUENT
ENSIGHT
CFD ProcessCFD Process
Page 142011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
TCE
CAD-Extraction
ANSA
ProAM Wrap
HARPOON
FLUENT
ENSIGHT
CFD ProcessCFD Process
Page 152011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
SERVER – 520 CPU:s(extra access to crash CPUs in case of free slots)
HardwareHardware
PC
VISTA (64 bits), 64-96 GB, 2 ProcessorsUsed for pre- and post-
processing
Used for the Solver
Page 162011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Closed front / semi detailed
Aerodynamics CFDAerodynamics CFD
Closed front, i.eno cooling flow
Symmetrycondition
Open front / fully detailed
Detailed engine
compartment
None symetric
Page 172011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Exterior optimization: closed front
Aerodynamics CFDAerodynamics CFD
Late separation Good separation
Page 182011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Aerodynamics CFDAerodynamics CFD
Iso surface total pressureVelocity plane 100mm downstream base
Exterior optimization: closed front
Skin friction
Page 192011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
+30 mmRef
-15 mm-30 mm
Aerodynamics CFDAerodynamics CFD
Roof height study: S80
Morphing
Page 202011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
+30 mmRef-15 mm
-30 mm
Aerodynamics CFDAerodynamics CFD
Roof height study: S80
Morphing
Page 212011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Greenhouse study: S80
Ref-10 mm-20 mm-30 mm
Aerodynamics CFDAerodynamics CFDMorphing
Page 222011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Underbody optimization: open front
Aerodynamics CFDAerodynamics CFD Cooling flow needed to optimize underbodydetails as deflectors
and underbody panels
Page 232011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Challanges with wheel house aerodynamics
Aerodynamics CFDAerodynamics CFD
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Page 242011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
Force (N) Cd*A Cd %
Exterior 153,9 0,331 0,143 48,5
Front Wheels 23,6 0,051 0,022 7,5
Rear Wheels 16,4 0,035 0,015 5,2
Front Suspension 7,1 0,015 0,007 2,2
Rear
Suspension 8,7 0,019 0,008 2,8
Front Wheel
Deflectors 8,1 0,018 0,008 2,6
Cooling
Package 97,3 0,209 0,090 30,7
Drive line 64,2 0,138 0,060 20,3
Floor -62,4 -0,134 -0,058 -19,7
TOTAL 317,25 0,682 0,295 100,0
Aerodynamics CFDAerodynamics CFD
CD vs x
Drag per part
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Page 252011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
• It is cheaper and faster than wind tunnel tests at early stages of the car development
• It provides the complete picture of the flow field
• It allows the brake down of the model for easier interpretation of the forces
• It allows direct comparison of the flow and local forces betweenconfigurations
• It is an excellent support and complement to wind tunnel tests
• Powerful tool to be used in combination with optimization
Strengths of using CFDStrengths of using CFD
KTH, Johan Ljungberg, jljungb3
Page 262011-03-25Issue date: 2010-04-19, Security Class: Public
STCC & WTCCSTCC & WTCC
ThankThank you! you!