VOLUMe 26, NUMBer 1 • FALL 2010 THE A DV · PDF filethe deed in lieu of foreclosure process from both the lender’s and borrower’s perspectives. II. ... Perspective: Tips and

  • Upload
    lecong

  • View
    216

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Deeds in Lieu of ForeclosureBy Francie Cohen Spahn, Esq.

    I. Introduction

    Deeds in lieu of foreclosure tend to be discussed from two differ-ent perspectives the lenders perspective and the borrowers per-spective. The lenders focus, for example, is on whether it can obtaingood and marketable title upon conveyance, whether it can preservethe priority of its mortgage lien against junior lienholders andinchoate mechanics liens, or whether the deed in lieu of foreclosureprocess may be preferable to the costs and delays often associatedwith the foreclosure process. The borrowers concerns include thatthe deed in lieu of foreclosure process is preferable to a foreclosurebecause it allows the borrower to avoid the public embarrass-ment of a foreclosure proceeding. This article explains some

    of the significant elements ofthe deed in lieu of foreclosureprocess from both the lenders andborrowers perspectives.

    II.What exactly is a deed in lieu of foreclosure?

    A deed in lieu of foreclosure is a process. It commenceswhen the borrower is no longer able to continue makingpayments to its lender. Having defaulted under its loan, theborrower (or mortgagor) might approach its lender with anoffer to surrender the property in exchange for the lendernot foreclosing on the property, but rather accepting it asconsideration for and in discharge of the borrowers debt.See In re Anderson, No. 95-15419, 1997 WL 1102027, 6

    (Bankr. E.D. Va. August 29, 1997). The lender will then determine whether it will accept theborrowers offer and, if so, under what terms. The parties will negotiate the terms of the sur-render, which will be memorialized in a settlement agreement at closing. Prior to closing, thelender will engage in a traditional due diligence process, including, among other things,reviewing the status of leases and contracts affecting the property and seeking title insurancefrom its title company. If all goes well, the parties proceed with closing, at which time theborrower transfers the deed to the lender and the lender arguably holds absolute title (ver-sus only a security interest in) the property.

    III.What is the process for effectuating a deed in lieu of foreclosure?

    A. Drafting the Settlement Agreement

    The deed in lieu of foreclosure process should begin with a written offer from the bor-rower to convey the property to the lender. This step evidences that the transaction is vol-

    THE ADVOCATEy o u n g l a w y e r s s e c t i o n m a ry l a n d s tat e b a r a s s o c i at i o n

    V O L U M e 2 6 , N U M B e r 1 F A L L 2 0 1 0

    Whats Inside

    2 From the Chair

    3 The 2010 Women

    in Law Leadership

    Academy: Take

    Charge of Your

    Own Career

    5 The Courts

    Perspective: Tips

    and Observations

    from Past and

    Present Judicial

    Clerks

    6 Solo and Small

    Firm Conference

    7 What We Do,

    And How to

    Join Us

    8 Harford Habitat for

    Humanity

    9 MSBA Annual

    Meeting Wrap Up

    courts may construe a deed inlieu of foreclosureaccompanied by []reserved rights asa security instru-ment instead of

    an absolute conveyance

    continued on page 10

  • THE ADVOCATEyoung lawyers section

    maryland state bar association

    EDITORSHeather r. Pruger

    William N. Sinclair

    ASSOCIATE EDITORSesther D. Coleman

    Andrea Padley

    Michael Palisano

    Purvi Patel

    rachel Smith

    OFFICERSMarla Zide, Chair

    erek L. Barron, Chair-Elect

    Wendy Sare Meadows, Secretary

    Wm. Carl Isler, Treasurer

    elizabeth Morris, Member-At-Large

    Jason Hessler, Immediate Past Chair

    Gwendolyn Tate, ABA Delegate

    STANDING COMMITTEESActivities Co-Chairs

    Kimberly Neal and Sandy Popp

    Disaster Relief Chairrob erdman

    Education Co-ChairsSidney Butcher and Dolores Dorsainvil

    Membership Co-ChairsThomas M. Weschler and regine Francois

    Nominating ChairTamara Goorevitz

    Policy ChairClaude de Vastey Jones

    Pro Bono Co-ChairsMike Hudak and Meredith Martin

    Public Service Co-ChairsGwendolyn S. Tate and Michael W. Siri

    Publications Co-ChairsHeather r. Pruger and William N. Sinclair

    Resolutions Co-ChairsGreg Kirby and Matthew S. Tidball

    Annual Meeting ChairLaurie Wasserman

    Diversity Initiative Co-ChairsLaKeecia r. Allen, Arielle Harry-Bess, & esther D. Coleman

    Legislative Liaison ChairJulia Carolan

    Historian ChairOmolade r. Akinbolaji

    Technology ChairTaren N. Stanton

    SPECIAL PROJECTS COMMITTEESWe the Jury / I Had A Dream Too Co-Chairs

    LaKeecia r. Allen, Arielle Harry-Bess, & esther D. Coleman

    Awards ChairBeverly Winstead

    Wills for Heroes / Children's Law Library Co-ChairsMelody Tagliaferri Cronin and Jessica Barnes

    CIRCUIT REPRESENTATIVES1stVacant (Dorchester, Somerset, Wicomico, Worcester)

    2ndVacant (Caroline, Cecil, Kent, Queen Anne's, Talbot)

    3rdChristine Britton (Harford, Baltimore County)

    4thVacant (Alleghany, Garrett, Washington)

    5thSarah Cline and richard H. Gibson, Jr.

    (Anne Arundel, Carroll, Howard)

    6thAndrew Schwartz and Caryn G. Seigel

    (Montgomery, Frederick)

    7thMonise Stephenson and Lisa Hall Johnson

    (Calvert, Prince George's, St. Mary's, Charles)

    8thI. DeAndrei Drummond (Baltimore City)

    BOG REPRESENTATIVESelizabeth Morris

    erek Baron

    Jason Hessler

    To get in touch with any of the individuals listed above, contact MSBA

    Headquarters at 410-685-7878 or 800-492-1964; or log on to the Young

    Lawyers Section website at www.msba.org/sec_comm/yls.

    The Advocate is published quarterly by the Section of Young Lawyers of the

    Maryland State Bar Association, 520 West Fayette Street, Baltimore, Md.

    21201, 410-685-7878, 800-492-1964.

    The opinions exercised in this publication are those of the authors and

    should not be construed to represent the opinions or policies of the Section

    of Young Lawyers or Maryland State Bar Association.

    2008 Maryland State Bar Association, Inc.

    2 | THE ADVOCATEFall 2010

    This article is being written as we are enjoying one of the hottest sum-mers in the history of Baltimore. Our country continues to be in an eco-nomic crisis and young lawyers are having difficult times finding jobs.Although times are hard, the young lawyers in our Maryland communitiescontinue to dedicate time and energy to volunteering providing not onlylegal services, but also community service.

    As my year begins, I would be remiss not to thank Jason Hessler, whoseshoes I dont think I will ever be able to fully fill. Jason has been an incred-ible leader, not only in the MSBA, but also within our Maryland commu-nities. Jason, his wife Shreya, and their two daughters have readied me andmy family for the experience of serving as Section Chair. I look forward tocontinuing to work closely with Jason on the executive committee and theBoard of Governors.

    We are looking forward to an amazing year in the Young LawyersSection. The Public Service Committee is already hard at work planningevents at the SPCA, blood drives, and Habitat for Humanity events.Michael Siri has reminded us that, just because its hot, it is not too earlyto plan for the Polar Bear Plunge in January. Our education and resolutioncommittees are working hard to plan events for the upcoming bar year.The membership committee, our most industrious committee of 2009-2010, has held several events over the Summer and looks forward to wel-

    coming new admittees and judi-cial clerks in the Fall. Ouractivity committee is busy at

    work planning the 2011Spring Fling. All of our

    committees welcome newfaces, new ideas, and assis-

    tance with planning. Please do not hesitateto contact us if you are interested in getting

    involved.While I look forward to being the face of the Young

    Lawyers Section this bar year, I know I am not the only voice. I want toensure all of our voices are heard, and I therefore look forward to hearingfrom you!

    Sincerely,

    Marla Zide

    From the Chair

  • THE ADVOCATE: Vol. 26.1 | 3

    When asked for his secret to success,

    Wayne Gretzky replied, I skate where

    the puck is going; others wait for the

    puck to come to them. While some

    might not expect a sports figure to be the

    source of a quote at a womens confer-

    ence, it aptly summed up the focus of the

    American Bar Associations 2010

    Women in Law Leadership Academy.

    The WILL Academya two day confer-

    ence in Philadelphiafocused on giving

    women the tools to take charge of their

    careers. Sessions addressed topics includ-

    ing Attributes of a Leader,

    Alternatives to Law Firm Practice,

    Navigating to Partnership,

    Rainmaking, and Succession Planning,

    Developing Your Personal Strategic

    Plan, Advice from the Bench, Best

    Practices and Advice from General

    Counsel, Negotiation Skills for

    Attorneys, and Restructuring Law

    Firms in a Down Market: Alternative

    Models and Work/Life Flexibility as Part

    of the Solution. The conference also

    included informal and moderated net-

    working opportunities.

    The sessions each addressed different

    situations and provided specific guidance

    tailored to those situations, but some

    common themes emerged: (1) know

    yourself; (2) know your audience; (3)

    plan ahead; and (4) work hard. This arti-

    cle focuses on those themes, which are

    equally applicable to male and female

    lawyers working to develop their careers.

    Know Yourself. Stereotypes aboundconcerning women: women are nurtur-

    ers; women are managers; women are

    emotional; women