PAGES 4, 6-10, 15

Volume 102, Issue 25January 17, 2013mcgilldaily.com

McGillDAILY

THE

Valued and principled since 1911

Published by The Daily Publications Society, a student society of McGill University.

The McGill Daily NEWS 2Thursday, January 17, 2013

mcgilldaily.com

NEWS

COMMENTARYThe meaning of Idle No More

02

06

Idle No More faces criticism

11 HEALTH&ED

13 CULTURE

16

15Japanese food worth the wait

Allyship and Idle No More

Preventing bullying in Montreal

Why you should support Idle No More

Montreal paramedics end strike

The western, deconstructed

EDITORIAL

COMPENDIUM!

Brain-related sports injuries

Mile End talk show

Masi talks university financing at SSMU Council

Idle No More, the media, and McGill

08 FEATURES

100 Arts classes to be eliminatedArts senator alleges cuts are punishment for Course Lecturer unionization

Dean of Arts Christopher Manfredi announced last Wednesday at a Faculty of

Arts Committee meeting that as many as 100 classes in the Faculty of Arts are set to be terminated for the 2013-2014 academic year. The number repre-sents 8 per cent of Arts courses.

The cuts have been under consid-eration since September of last year.

According to Manfredi, smaller classes currently taught by full-time professors will be cut, and the professors moved to larger lectures at the expense of the tem-porary course lecturers currently teaching them.

In an email to The Daily, Manfredi wrote that that the objective was to “increase the proportion of Arts courses and students taught by per-manent, full-time faculty members.”

“Whenever possible and reason-able, our Arts courses ought to be taught by permanent, full-time fac-ulty members rather than temporary teaching staff,” he wrote.

Each individual department with-in the Faculty of Arts will decide how

to achieve the objective.“One way to achieve this objec-

tive is to ask permanent, full-time faculty members to teach slightly fewer of the lower enrolment cours-es and to teach instead more of the larger introductory and intermedi-ate courses that are often currently being taught by temporary teach-ing staff (called course lecturers at McGill). Another way to achieve this objective is to rotate lower enrol-ment courses on a two or three year basis. Yet another way is to replace several lower enrolment courses with a more broadly defined slot course,” wrote Manfredi.

The move, according to Manfredi, will save the faculty money that will then be put directly into other teach-ing support like Teaching Assistants (TAs) and activities like internship programs and student advising.

“Additional TAs and TA-ships will mean more financial support for graduate students, smaller confer-ence sections, better undergraduate student access to certain courses, and more time for professors to have sub-stantive interactions with students,” stated Manfredi.

AGSEM – McGill’s Teaching Union President Lilian Radovac told

The Daily that she was surprised and disappointed by the decision. The union is composed of three units: course lecturers, invigilators, and teaching assistants.

“No one from the faculty spoke with the union that represents course lecturers at McGill, even to give us a heads-up, let alone to consult with us on this move,” said Radovac.

The course lecturers unit of the union was certified in August 2011 and is currently negotiating their first collective agreement with the University. According to Radovac, the decision of cutting classes was not addressed during negotiations with the administration.

Arts Senator James Gutman told The Daily that he believed the administration is “punishing course lecturers for unionizing.”

“What this does is pit course lec-turers against TAs, because they’re saying: ‘we’re going to cut course lecturers but we’re going to give it to TAs’,” he said.

Radovac stated that AGSEM stands united in its opposition to these cuts. “[The teaching assis-tant unit in AGSEM] is aware of the fact that McGill does not deal fairly with any of its employee groups and

they’ve had twenty years of experi-ence learning that.”

Radovac also stated that the deci-sion to cut smaller classes will nega-tively affect the quality of education at McGill.

“We don’t have enough [small classes] as it is, our students are cry-ing out for more intimate learning settings and instead of giving more opportunity to learn in a smaller class environment with more one-on-one time with their instructors, the university is now going to give them less of that.”

Arts Undergraduate Society VP Academic Tom Zheng believes that “courses should not be cut, stu-dents should have access to a diver-sity of courses.”

Zheng also mentioned that while he encouraged an increase in the number of TAs to reduce the TA to student ratio, classes should not be cut to achieve this. “Both [increase in TA and course lecturers] should be done without one affecting the other,” he said.

The decision-making process is still ongoing and a Town Hall meeting – planned by the AUS – for the Dean and students to discuss is planned for January 22.

Juan Camilo VelásquezThe McGill Daily

The problem with advanced standing

news The McGill Daily | Thursday, January 17, 2013 | mcgilldaily.com 3

Administration withdraws proposed protocolStatement of “values” on free expression to be released

T he McGill administration has abandoned plans for a permanent protocol regu-

lating campus protests, following a condemnation from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA).

The CCLA’s statement reads that the organization has “significant concerns about the extent to which [the protocol] pr otects freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association on campus and whether it assists members of the communi-ty in understanding the limits being placed on these rights.”

“We’re claiming this as a vic-tory for everybody who worked to oppose the protocol,” said Lilian Radovac, the president of AGSEM – McGill’s Teaching Union.

Although the administration’s announcement said that its decision came solely as a result of the consul-tation process, Radovac believes it was much more likely that “the con-fluence of the opposition from the unions, the media attention, and ultimately criticism from a national civil liberties group that […] lead to such a dramatic about-face.”

Despite campus unions and student groups raising similar con-cerns during the initial consulta-tion process, the administration released a proposed version of the protocol reflecting no substantive changes to the university-wide com-munity on November 30.

The administration’s announce-ment released yesterday states that “the McGill community will be best served by an agreed-upon statement of values and principles, rather than a protocol of operating

procedures, which, by definition, must be sensitive to context and determined by judgment,” and that it will now embark on a second con-sultation process.

Radovac added that for AGSEM, “the issue won’t be fully resolved until the provisional protocol is offi-cially revoked […] there should be no protocol at McGill.”

The provisional protocol was first introduced in February of 2012, imme-diately following the five-day occupa-tion of Deputy Provost (Student Life & Learning) Morton Mendelson’s office in the James Administration building. According to the email that first released the protocol, it was to

“remain in effect until further notice.” Late Wednesday, members of

the administration could not say whether or not the provisional pro-tocol was still in effect.

The CCLA statement was dated January 8, posted to the CCLA’s website, and sent to Provost Anthony Masi and VP (Administration and Finance) Michael Di Grappa via the email address provided during the protocol’s consultation pro-cess. According to Cara Faith Zwibel, the CCLA’s Fundamental Freedoms Program director and the statement’s author, the CCLA never received a response from

the University.Last week, the protocol received

even more off-campus attention when a Montreal Gazette article reported on U3 philosophy student Eli Freedman’s grievance to Senate about the protocol, and quoted McGill alumnus and prominent civil rights lawyer Julius Grey as noting an increasingly harsh attitude about campus dissent at McGill.

Anti-protocol campus mobili-zation had been underway since last February and intensified after a revised version was released to campus unions and student groups for consultation in November. The new version included a definition

of what would be deemed a “peace-ful” demonstration. Campus unions and student groups pub-lished letters in student and the Montreal press, which in turn pub-lished critical editorials. Several student associations voted to con-demn the protocol.

AGSEM launched a website last week, endorsed by campus unions MUNACA and AMUSE, as well as the Philosophy Students’ Association, compiling informa-tion and press clippings about the protocol, and promoting a pro-test that was to be staged January 23 – the same day that the proto-col was to go before Senate.

Lola DuffortThe McGill Daily

Campus groups organize against provincial budget cutsProfessors’ union publicly denounce decision

P ressure on the provincial government is escalating as Quebec universities begin

to mobilize against the $124 mil-lion budget cut initiated by the Parti Québécois (PQ).

The budget cut came as sur-prise to universities across the province when it was announced last month, in the middle of the 2012 fiscal year.

Student and administrative groups across campus are starting to mobilize their opposition to the cuts.

Alvin Shrier, president of the McGill Association of University Teachers (MAUT) talked to The Daily about publicly denouncing

the budgetary restraints.“People have to stand up and

speak with a loud voice. For the government to expect a university to come to a substantial cut late in the fiscal year while preparing for something different – well it’s hard to imagine the government doing that on itself,” he said.

MAUT sent a motion to all parties concerned as well as the Montreal Gazette at the end of last year. The motion calls for “all universities, student associations and faculty unions and associa-tions to establish a unified and common position in demanding a reversal of the budget policy on higher education and research put forward by the Quebec Government.”

Quebec universities are now

faced with cuts of up to 15 per cent over the next four months, accord-ing to the MAUT motion.

Shrier expressed concern over what kind of cuts McGill would implement, fearing students services will be the first to face adjustments.

“I could see some of the first cuts we’ll see will be on student services,” he said.

The McGill University Non-Academic Certified Association (MUNACA) has also reacted to the cuts.

“It is completely unreason-able that these cuts are retroac-tive, made well after university budgets have been set. McGill’s budget includes a recently signed collective agreement and a soon to be signed pay equity agreement,

both of which MUNACA and McGill achieved with help from govern-ment conciliators,” read MUNACA’s official statement.

“No matter how universities might make these cuts, they will be damaging to the core functions of universities, which will ultimately be damaging to the province generally.”

The cuts were announced near-ly two months before the upcoming summit on higher education slated for late February. SSMU VP External Robin-Reid Fraser expressed con-cern about the effects of these cuts on the summit.

“The impression given before was that all options were on the table, to be discussed in a con-structive way…it was very poor timing on the government’s part”.

SSMU will be releasing a state-

ment on the matter shortly, but indicated a consensus of discon-tentment with the cuts.

The Post-Graduate Students’ Society (PGSS) also pointed to the summit in their own press release stating: “With the Quebec Summit on Higher Education to be held in February, these cuts undermine the Government’s credibility to genuinely address the issue of higher education funding.”

PGSS is calling for the Quebec government to reverse their deci-sion on the university cuts.

Principal Heather Munroe-Blum will be participating in a pre-summit meeting on January 17 and January 18 on the topic of governance and financing of uni-versities. The meeting will be held at Université de Sherbrooke.

Hannah BesseauThe McGill Daily

Illustration Amina Batyreva | The McGill Daily

NEWSThe McGill Daily | Thursday, January 17, 2013 | mcgilldaily.com4

Explore an MS in

HUMAN GENETICS

To learn more, please visit www.slc.edu/human-genetics, call (914) 395-2371, or email us at grad@sarahlawrence.edu

and surrounding areas

midtown Manhattan

In 1969, Sarah Lawrence College established the first U.S. Master’s program in Human Genetics. Today, we’re the

largest and most influential—having trained almost half the world’s genetic counselors. Come join us for a great education and a fulfilling career in an expanding array of fields!

Held first Thursday of every month in Westchester or Manhattan!

OPEN HOUSE

LANGUAGE COURSES

FITNESS, DANCE, ART, etc.20-40 hrs/ 10 weeks – 99$ to 175$

10 & 11 weeks – 55$ to 80$

WINTER SESSIONJanuary – April

REGISTER NOW!McGill Students and Staff Welcome!!

French: Beginners • Level 2 Intermediate • Advanced

Day, Evening and SundaysAlso: English, Spanish, German

Italian, Russian , Portuguese, Arab, Chinese, Japanese, Hungarian

Yoga • Pilates • Cardio • Boot Camp Tai-chi • Bellydancing (Baladi)

Zumba • Tae Kwon Do • Dance (African, Salsa, Latino) • Toning

Meditation • Knitting & Crocheting Jewelry Making • Collage &

Scrapbooking • Water Color Painting Drawing • Swimming

ASSOCIATION RÉCRÉATIVE MILTON-PARC

(a non-profi t organization, serving the community since 1985)

3555 St-Urbain Place-des-Artswww.miltonpark.org • 514 872-0566

JUNE 3 – 15, 2013

Humber School of Creative & Performing ArtsToronto, Ontario, Canada

For 12 full days of in-depth training you will:

learn from some of the best professional

puppet artists in North America

take courses in Construction, Manipulation and

Ensemble Creation

work in the state-of-the-art facilities of Humber

College's Arts and Media Studios

rediscover your own endless artistic potential

www.humber.ca/puppetry

Puppetry Intensive

Immerse yourself in a world of infinite possibility

Check the news section online for AUS and PGSS council coverage.

http://www.mcgilldaily.com/category/news/

news@mcgilldaily.com

Mohawk Traditional Council declines to endorse Idle No More

Role of Assembly of First Nations questioned

Protest rhetoric tends to err on the side of boundless optimism, but when Stuart

Myiow stood up in front of the crowd of hundreds at the Idle No More protest last Friday, he bluntly broke the mold.

“The Mohawk Traditional Council (MTC) can’t directly sup-port the Idle No More movement,” he said, reading from the statement that the Council had released that day. Myiow is a temporary Wolf Clan representative of the Council.

The MTC statement goes on to outline its criticisms of the Idle No More movement, saying it has “too many voices saying too many different things, including some radical and controversial demands, allowing those respon-sible for the problems…to hijack the movement.”

Initially, the crowd didn’t seem

to register the potentially contro-versial content of the statement, which, like the other speeches that day, was peppered with cheers and applause.

Wahéhshon Shiann Whitebean is a female chief on the Mohawk Traditional Council and one of the co-signatories of the state-ment. She explained why she saw the breadth of opinions in Idle No More as problematic.

“People are standing up, but they don’t know what to do to make a difference, which is why there needs to be leadership and direc-tion,” she said. “If Idle No More is the beginning of something, it would be good to see people take it somewhere.”

Melissa Mollen-Dupuis, a Montreal-based Indigenous rights activist and one of the march’s orga-nizers, said that she thought it was really important that the MTC have a say, even “if we don’t agree with everything they have to say.”

“I’m not scared of people not

being okay with the movement, that’s for sure. I think it would be more scary if everyone agreed with everything.”

In response to the criticism of there being too many voices in the movement for it to accom-plish anything, Mollen-Dupuis said that she saw Idle No More’s ideological openness as one of its greatest strengths.

“Idle No More definitely has a lot of voices and a lot of differ-ent ideas. They can see that as a negative thing, but I see it as a very positive thing,” she said. “Voices are like twigs: if you have one twig it will break, but many twigs won’t break as easily. People might want to have a clear unilateral voice that says the same thing, but that’s not going to happen.”

The Mohawk Traditional Council of Kahnawake co-exists with its Mohawk Band Council. The latter is one of 630 Canadian First Nation band councils whose chiefs are represented by the Assembly

of First Nations (AFN), the current governing structure of First Nations on the federal level. In the past, some of the band councils have suf-fered heavy criticism after charges of corruption and failing to be prop-erly representative.

Contrary to the electoral sys-tem by which a native community’s band council is formed, traditional councils’ representatives are nomi-nated by clan mothers and con-firmed through consensus.

The MTC’s statement listed a series of demands, including that band councillors fight to “dissolve the structure of the AFN, […] for-mally pull out of the self-govern-ment agreement [and] dissolve the elective band council system.”

Joe Delaronde is a spokesper-son for the Mohawk Council of Kahnawake, on Montreal’s south shore. He acknowledged that the AFN has had its share of problems in the past, but doesn’t see the dis-solution of the Assembly as a via-ble road to solving the problems

of Indigenous peoples in Canada.“The AFN is not perfect, the

council system is not perfect, but is there any other body that brings Native peoples together? I don’t see one,” he said in a phone interview with The Daily. “If peo-ple don’t like the AFN, I invite them to come up with some other method that brings people together and gives them a chance to have a voice about issues of national importance.”

Whitebean, however, said that complete dissolution of the structure of the Assembly of First Nations and of the band council system is a perfectly reasonable and realistic goal.

“It would be stupid to support anyone in the band council system because it’s something that has destroyed our people,” she said. “The elected system does not work for our people. In fact, we’ve been contacted by other nations to help them set up their own tra-ditional councils.”

Carla GreenThe McGill Daily

news The McGill Daily | Thursday, January 17, 2013 | mcgilldaily.com 5

Paramedics end two-week administrative strikeUnion unanimously endorses tentative deal to its members

Quebec’s paramedic workers ended their two-and-a-half- week symbolic strike last

Friday. A tentative agreement was reached after three days of intense negotiations between Quebec’s Minister of Health and Social Services, Dr. Réjean Hébert, and negotiators for the 2,500 paramedi-cal employees affiliated with labour federation Confédération des syndi-cats nationaux (CSN).

Quebec’s paramedics have been without a contract since March 2010.

The agreement, which was announced by Hébert last Thursday, still needs to be ratified by individu-al union members.

A resounding 71 per cent of the union’s members voted down a pre-vious tentative agreement between the CSN and the province in October 2012, but Jeff Begley, presi-dent of the Federation of Health and Social Services of the CSN, told The Daily that he expects a differ-ent outcome this time.

“The delegates received the information on the agreement and unanimously decided to recommend it to the members,” Begley said.

Regional general assemblies of CSN members started across the province on Tuesday. “We expect that in the next two weeks the agree-ment will be ratified, and signed in the days that follow,” Begley said.

The strike, which started on December 24, was the first legal strike

ever undertaken by the paramedics.Paramedical services are deemed

to be an essential service under the Essential Services Act, which meant that strikers were legally responsible for providing 100 per cent of their normal services. Instead of reduc-ing emergency ambulance services, the strike was administrative, with paramedics refusing to completely fill out insurance forms.

“When you call an ambulance, somebody pays for it – either your insurance, or Quebec auto insur-ance, or you personally. There are papers that have to be filled out so that whoever has to be billed, can be billed. Those are the kinds of papers that weren’t completely filled out,” Begley told The Daily.

The CBC reported that para-medics had stopped telling hospi-tals when non-urgent cases were brought in, making work harder for their emergency room staff. Apparently, this was especially tough during the end of December, when there were an abnormally large number of patients suffering from the seasonal flu.

However, a representative from the McGill University Health Centre, which runs six teaching hospitals in the Montreal region, including the Montreal General Hospital, told The Daily that patient care was unaffected by the strike.

The Essential Services Act meant extra work for the striking ambulance technicians, since complaints about a diminishment of service from the public could have meant fines for the union. “That means that we have to

have teams that, even though they aren’t working, they have to make sure that everything is running smoothly. That is a lot of work,” Begley said.

In an attempt to make the strike visible to members of the pub-lic, ambulances were decorated with colourful signs that read: “En Grève” – “on strike” in French.

The union’s strike tactic, which included demonstrations through-out the province, seemed to speed up negotiations, which have been ongoing since February 2011. “We did notice since the beginning of the strike that the government has been

feeling more and more pressured to come to an agreement,” Begley said.

In a press release, Hébert said that he was proud that an agree-ment, satisfactory to all parties, was found. “Finding common ground was a big challenge,” he added.

The new collective agreement, if ratified, will reduce the number of pay scales from 16 to 14, allowing paramedics to reach the top of pay scale two years earlier. This is still far from parity with other provinces, which the union was initially seeking, where it takes on average five years to reach the maximum pay scale.

The paramedic’s previous con-tract also stipulated that paramed-ics were not being paid extra for the first half-hour of overtime. “This was a rather strange clause,” Begley said, “from now on – at the end of the reg-ular eight-hour day if you have to stay and work longer, you are paid time-and-a-half.”

Changes have also been made to the pension plan, where accrued benefits have been increased from 0.8 per cent of a paramedic’s salary per year to 0.85 per cent per year.

The new agreement, if ratified, will be up for renegotiation in 2015.

Farid RenerThe McGill Daily

Montreal paramedics ended a two-week strike. Photo Laurent Bastien Corbeil | The McGill Daily

Admin talks university finances at SSMU CouncilMotions call for more transparency in the education system

SSMU Legislative Council dis-cussed university financing and the state of education in

Quebec at their first meeting of 2013.The meeting opened with a

financial management report from Provost Anthony Masi, who spent the better part of half an hour answering SSMU VP External Robin Reid-Fraser’s question about wheth-er Quebec universities were truly underfunded or just mismanaged.

Masi’s response focused on the changing directives given to McGill from the provincial government over the course of the year. “If there’s any-thing being mismanaged, it’s the way government have asked universities to prepare their budgets,” he said.

Masi stated that the Parti Québécois’ (PQ) decision to abol-ish the tuition increase slated for September meant a loss of $7 million

in expected revenue for the University.He continued that McGill was

pushed to cut an additional 5.2 per cent from its annual budget following the PQ’s controversial December announcement that uni-versities in the province retroactive-ly cut $124 million from their costs.

Because the decision was announced so late in the fiscal year – and because the province expects the savings to be realized by April 2013 – the administration argues that the cut will amount to 15 per cent for the remainder of the fiscal year.

“Our underfunding is real this year. Absolutely real…because we’ve had four different messages to pre-pare our budget…I don’t think that’s financial mismanagement on the part of the university,” Masi stated.

The themes of university financ-ing and the state of education in Quebec continued with two motions introduced by Reid-Fraser.

The first, the motion regarding an alternative education summit,

was amended to instead call for an états généraux.

“An alternative education summit could have been quite interesting, but it would have required a great deal of resources on the part of us, [Table de concertation étudiante du Québec (TaCEQ)], and whoever else were to be involved,” Reid-Fraser said in an email to The Daily.

An états généraux is a process of consultation spanning from a year to 18 months which the Quebec National Assembly would be responsible for commissioning and funding, which would include the participation of stu-dent associations across the province.

Reid-Fraser said that the peri-od of time provided by the états généraux would allow for more dis-cussion, and the creation of a clearer collective vision than the current education summit.

Reid-Fraser intimated that the pro-cess was long overdue. “We haven’t had an examination of higher edu-cation in Quebec since the Parent

Commission in the 1960s,” she said.In light of the amendments to the

motion regarding an alternative edu-cation summit, the motion regard-ing états généraux was amended to ask for a comparative audit of univer-sity finances in Quebec.

“There doesn’t seem to be an overall picture of university financ-ing,” Reid-Fraser said at Council. She suggested a comparative approach rather than the current focus on individual institutions.

SSMU President Josh Redel clarified the wording and intent of the motion. “I think here the term ‘audit’ is trying to get at the core of why we spend on certain things. …When you say you want more transparency, that’s like seeing it, and I think the audit is next step where we now investigate it.”

The motion regarding états généraux was tabled indefinitely to allow time for more research.

Reid-Fraser told The Daily that she would be working with the

SSMU External Affairs Committee and Political Attaché & Researcher so that the demands can be brought to TaCEQ and to the pro-vincial government.

Two motions regarding SSMU by-laws 13.6.1 and 13.6.3, which deal with regulations on club sta-tus and membership, were passed with no opposition. VP Clubs & Services Allison Cooper told Council that she intended for the by-law amendments to open full status to clubs with a more uncon-ventional structure.

A motion regarding the removal of Queer McGill’s undergraduate fund by-law passed as well. Cooper explained that the elimination of the by-law allowed for a more effi-cient discretionary system for allo-cating internal funds.

A motion regarding an amend-ment to the Elections SSMU electoral timeline passed with no opposition. The electoral timeline will now take into account reading week in March.

Esther Lee and Dana WrayThe McGill Daily

The McGill Daily commentary 6Thursday, January 17, 2013

mcgilldaily.com

eded

It’s about people, not politicsIdle No More and the importance of action

Idle No More is a collective shift in thinking and being that has manifested as broad

social and political action to chal-lenge state agendas, authorities, and institutions. At its core, Idle No More is rooted in unity and represents a transformation or restoration to ways of being in the world as an Indigenous per-son. This is a historical turning point for an emerging wave of Indigenous activism that aims to tackle environmental and human rights issues. It has spread like wildfire around the world and although there are gaps in direc-tion, it appears to have reached a breaking point for Indigenous people, and there will be no fur-ther idling.

The list goes on of collabora-tive events between Indigenous nations and respective allies (grassroots supporters, environ-mentalists, human rights activ-ists) who are working coopera-tively to maintain the momentum of the Idle No More movement. The relatively recent coverage of the movement by the mainstream media does little justice to repre-senting views alternative to those of the Harper government and even to those of the Assembly of

First Nations (AFN). The f lurry of stories has thus far succeeded in confusing the general public with tried and true tactics of politi-cal distraction by overwhelming both supporters and opposition with erroneous information. As Malcolm X stated: “If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing” – this is exemplified by the ongoing media attacks and finger pointing amongst appoint-ed leadership.

Although the problems were initiated in the past, they remain unacknowledged as a national tragedy today, a complete fail-ure of human accountability and decency. Things have morphed over the past few centuries, but the legacy of colonization remains on a variety of levels – so how do Indigenous people decol-onize? Well, that is the burning multi-billion dollar question at stake – finding solutions for this goal has continuously been chal-lenged since the identification of the ‘Indian problem.’ Through a means more calculated than you or I can imagine, the institutional powers that control our glori-ous home and native land will never genuinely support these solutions. Instead, the current structure will continue to create

animosity and tension to distract us from our greater, collective goals as Indigenous nations and Canadian allies.

We must get at the funda-mental issues, not the symp-toms. The root of the problem is structural and is the direct result of a longstanding process of de-culturation, a disconnect from sources of traditional teachings. This is the colonized mind and soul, and its deleterious effects are profound – many generations have the burden of inheriting this deep-rooted pain, and they must be given the respect and support to confront these issues to heal on their own time.

A wise man once told me, “You don’t get rehab from the drug dealer; you cannot expect the person who broke it to fix it.” That is precisely what Indigenous people are up against: a battle to restore the balance in all nations, a fight to extract the harmful con-trol of the federal government upon each nation, which is an extremely complex and sensitive process that ultimately interferes with the goal of sustaining sover-eign nations.

The static political and legal definitions of Indigenous identi-ties (i.e. Aboriginal, a state-sanc-tioned definition) are methods used to control every aspect of Indigenous lives, an entity recti-fied by the treacherous Indian Act. For a succinct account of the Indian Act, search YouTube for “Pam Palmater – Idle No More,” for her poignant analysis. Former Prime Minister Paul Martin stated that the “Indian Act is racist and should be abolished.” Regardless of these abhorrent definitions pertaining to identity, Indigenous peoples have and always will fight to live in accordance with their respective customs, laws, and tra-ditions – this cannot be dictated by the Canadian and provincial governments, nor by a handful of elected ‘Chiefs.’

Indigenous peoples are sov-ereign nations with the inher-ent right to self-determination. However, we are intrinsically divided and unique, and there-fore unification may not be pos-sible. Over time and through sus-tained movement, we can restore our nations by adapting culturally sound strategies. The key is move-ment – we just need movement to start the process of healing the rifts to collectively push for the cultivation of respectful relation-ships for all interactions between individuals, families, clans, tradi-tional territories, plants, and ani-mals. This is a spiritual revolution,

a resurgence of Indigenous peo-ples – although that appears very cryptic to most of us, the nature of this movement works on a con-tinuum of growing consciousness or re-awakening.

The most inspiring aspect of this movement is the involve-ment of Indigenous youth. Each child aware and actively involved in this movement brings prom-ise for restoring healthy, sus-tainable Indigenous communi-ties. The well-known American Indian Movement activist Russell Means said: “…I’d much rather get across the concept of free-dom. It’s what’s important to Indian children. The only way you can be free is to know that you are worthwhile as a distinct human being. Otherwise you become what the colonizers have designed…Get in line, punch all the right keys, and die.” These kids have a beautiful capac-ity for understanding and shar-ing the concept of freedom, or rather contributing to the foun-dations of resistance for being Indigenous in this tenuous time, including being grounded in fam-ily and community, nurturing connection to land, and learning language, traditional knowledge, and spirituality.

From what I see, there is a lot of work to be done, but a few small successes can and will spur action to revitalize our spiritual and cul-tural foundations as strong nations. My greatest fear is that everything will remain the same or worsen, and the Idle No More movement will lose its momentum. The signif-

icant dates #J11 [January 11], #J16, and #J28 will quickly come and go; therefore, lasting change comes from one’s personal commitment to transformation.

I have made my education my priority and therefore I am not in a position to return to my communi-ty. It has and always will be a pain-ful tradeoff of career advancement over cultural connection. To coun-teract and involve myself with the Idle No More movement, I follow a variety of Indigenous and allied voices, rather than mainstream media, and this has become a daily necessity. Drawing upon many perspectives (while avoiding igno-rant and racist remarks), enables me to raise awareness and have conversation with others more or less knowledgeable on the issues than myself. To move forward, we must engage and utilize all of the talents of the people within our communities to begin a process of regeneration. This involves but is not limited to: instilling mentor-ing and learning relationships that foster real and meaningful human development and community solidarity; using our Indigenous languages to frame our thoughts; and moving away from political agendas and toward traditional philosophies. Everyone has a pur-pose – we need movement.

Gila’kasla.

Jessica BarudinCommentary Writer

Jessica Barudin is a Kwakwaka’wakw Graduate student, Representative of the Indigenous Student Alliance of McGill and the McGill First Peoples’ House. Send responses to jessica.barudin@mail.mcgill.ca.

Illustration Amina Batyreva | The McGill Daily

commentary The McGill Daily | Thursday, January 17, 2013 | mcgilldaily.com 7

A ll across my Facebook feed, Twitter, and the edi-torial pages of the coun-

try’s more left-leaning newspapers, white settlers are donning red feathers and declaring “I support Idle No More!” Congratulations, friends. Have a cookie for acknowl-edging oppression exists, and that those who experience it have a right to resist. (Give the cookie back if your comment was along the lines of “I support Idle No More, but...”)

All snarking aside, I think those of us who think of ourselves as activists, leftists, progressives, or just all-around tolerant people, need to talk about allyship. Being an ally means supporting the struggles of those who experience a form of oppression you benefit from.

Rule number one is that you lis-ten to the people you’re supporting. You can offer your support, but it’s up to them. They owe you nothing.

Recently, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair urged Attawapiskat Chief Theresa Spence to end her hun-ger strike, because in his judge-ment Stephen Harper’s govern-ment had taken “a step in the

right direction.” No one asked for Mulcair’s advice. As a white man and as a politician, his opin-ion is usually given more weight than that of other people, espe-cially that of a Native woman. Instead of helping Chief Spence and those he claims to support, he decided that being an ‘ally’ gave him the right to say “this far, and no farther.” That is not allyship, it is entitlement.

Idle No More is a series of events in a long history of struggle for self-determination and decolonization on Turtle Island. Although the demands around Bill C-45 are important, we potential supporters need to be aware that this struggle doesn’t end there. Like all liberation struggles, the fight for the liberation of the Native peoples of this continent will not be over until the structures of power that oppress them are destroyed. Those of us who benefit from those structures will not survive intact.

Should decolonization succeed within his lifetime, Thomas Mulcair, MP, head of the NDP, will no lon-ger exist. Neither will I. (I’m rather looking forward to it.) That is not to imply death or deportation, though either would be payback for centu-ries of genocide. Rather, the systems of knowledge we believe in, the cus-toms we abide by, the institutions we inhabit, the economy we depend on, the languages we speak, the

identities we claim; all of these are colonial artifacts. Even de-centering them from their assumed positions of neutrality and dominance would shake us to the core. But their place on this continent (and ours by exten-sion) is unearned, and their displace-ment is a necessity.

This is what we sign up for when we decide to work for the liberation of others. This is not just a matter of keeping the pie intact and giving some oppressed group a slightly bigger slice. Equality and justice require such massive transformations that those of us who benefit from priv-ileges due to our race, gender, ethnicity, class, ability, sexuality, or anything else will lose our-selves along the way.

But we need not assume that just because others are gaining some-thing we will be worse off. Change is difficult, of course, and even losing things you didn’t need anymore can hurt. But we have a lot to gain. In a recent blog post, Angus Johnston, a historian and advocate of student activism, wrote about how being asked to name his preferred pro-nouns – a first step towards trans* liberation – gave him a sense of pos-sibility and freedom, even though he generally benefits from everyone assuming his gender correctly.

Liberation struggles are, first and foremost, necessary for peo-

ple who experience oppression. Obviously. But those of us with vari-ous privileges can also benefit from freedom from the structures we’ve been bound up in. Only, getting there requires listening to people we’re not used to hearing when they say things we don’t want to hear, holding our tongue when we want to claim ‘but we’re not all like that,’ standing up to our powerful friends and colleagues when they perpetuate oppression, and yes, embracing our own destruction.

On that last point, a note: saying “Yo, fuck white people” doesn’t erase your white privilege.

Believing that you, as a straight per-son, shouldn’t speak for queer peo-ple doesn’t absolve you from stand-ing up to the homophobes in your classroom who take your silence for approval. Being politically correct is not enough, but shifting our think-ing from aiming to be inoffensive to wanting to advance liberation can be a big step in actually getting there. Hear that, Mr. Mulcair?

Mona LuxionThrough the Looking Glass

In Through the Looking Glass, Mona Luxion reflects on activism, current events, and looking beyond identity politics. Email Mona at lookingglass@mcgilldaily.com.

Decolonize yourselfThe creative/destructive potential of allies

Anti-bullying actionWhy we must fight for change in schools

In late November 2011, 15-year-

old Marjorie Raymond took her own life. Her death shook

Quebec, awakening Quebecers to the pervasiveness of bullying in the province’s schools.

A high school student in the tiny northern Quebec town of Sainte-Anne-des-Monts, Raymond was bullied verbally and physically throughout her two and a half years at Gabriel-Le Courtois School. One month before her death, she was reported as having been physically bullied at school by one of her close friends, an incident from which she allegedly never recovered. In the note she wrote before taking her own life, she blamed “jealous people who want only to ruin oth-ers’ happiness.” It seems clear that bullying and violence were ele-ments that factored into Marjorie Raymond’s tragic decision.

Two months after Raymond’s death, Bill 56, “An Act to Prevent and Stop Bullying and Violence

in Schools,” was introduced at the National Assembly of the Parliament of Quebec by Minister of Education Line Beauchamp. This bill, which was passed on June 15, 2012, requires that “every [Quebec] public and private educational insti-tution… adopt and implement an anti-bullying and anti-violence plan” that includes preventative and disci-plinary measures to end “all forms of bullying and violence.”

Sabrina Nicholson, a third-year Kindergarten and Elementary Education student at McGill, clari-fies what Bill 56 means for Montreal elementary schools, based on her three-month field experience at Willington Elementary in the fall of 2012: “The administration…must ensure that their staff is informed about this bill, and then they have to encourage their staff – the teach-ers – to do something about it.”

In addition to teachers, other school staff members can be involved in putting Bill 56 into action. Frank Lofeodo is a spiri-tual community animator at four English Montreal School Board schools. He works with both ele-

mentary and high school students to help prevent negative situations from arising in the school environ-ment and has experience imple-menting a variety of programs to deal with the issues of bullying and violence in response to the passage of Bill 56. At the secondary level, he explains, “we approach the bullying problem through the students.” In other words, their input is used to determine how instances of bully-ing can be dealt with. Based on stu-dent input, John F. Kennedy High School has implemented a program in which students can anonymously bring cases of bullying and repeat-ed perpetrators to the attention of the school’s staff and administra-tors. Students repeatedly acting in inappropriate ways are paired with volunteer staff members who act as positive behaviour mentors, offer-ing constant support to the stu-dents throughout the year. Lofeodo explains that this strategy “[deals] with the behaviour in a positive way, and [encourages] that person to be a productive, positive mem-ber of the school community.”

In addition, several other ini-

tiatives are being taken at the sec-ondary level, including pep rallies centered on the issue of bullying, motivational speakers, and Physical Education uniform t-shirts carry-ing anti-bullying slogans. “It’s an all-encompassing thing we’re trying to do,” says Lofeodo, “to keep [the issue of bullying] in front of their awareness through the year, and to deal with the specific problems when need be…and to get kids involved in a positive way.”

At the elementary level, a num-ber of programs have been imple-mented at the schools with which Lofeodo is involved, including Peace by P.E.A.C.E, Don’t Laugh at Me, and The Power of One. Peace by P.E.A.C.E is a nine-week con-flict resolution program taught by McGill student volunteers, which emphasizes concepts such as anti-bullying, inner power, tolerance, and communication through interactive games, skits, and discussions. The goal of the program is to give children the tools to resolve conflicts in a posi-tive manner. Lofeodo believes that the skills taught in the Peace

by P.E.A.C.E program can consti-tute bullying-prevention tools for elementary school students. He comments that “[the program’s] activities deal with relationships between people, and if you can foster positive relationships…you then diminish bullying.”

Student-run organizations like Peace by P.E.A.C.E testify to the involvement of the McGill commu-nity in anti-bullying and anti-violence efforts in Montreal. McGill students can continue contributing to these efforts in the Montreal community by getting involved with such organi-zations, or by otherwise supporting them. Peace by P.E.A.C.E recruits vol-unteers each fall semester and hosts several fundraising events to help sup-port their initiatives, like the upcom-ing annual benefit show taking place at Casa del Popolo on January 18. Why not lend a hand so that the world of tomorrow can be a better, safer, hap-pier place for everyone?

Julia DevorakCommentary Writer

Julia Devorak is the Fundraising Director of Peace by P.E.A.C.E Montreal. She can be reached at julia.devorak@mail.mcgill.ca.

Illustration Amina Batyreva | The McGill Daily

The McGill Daily features 8Thursday, January 17, 2013

mcgilldaily.com

The willow that weeps no more

T he air was cold, sharp, biting. A medi-cine man was burning sage in a cleans-ing ceremony and a sacred fire burned

in my peripheral. An elder called forth all the women who knew the Willow Song to come share the voices. In my Torontonian grade school, Canada’s history begins with the so-called discovery of the Americas. The Willow Song, as well as many other Inidigenous tra-ditions, was never taught. As the beat of my heart blended with the beat of the drums, I began to understand the immensity of the his-tory I did not know. So I took some notes from the Willow Song: willow trees bend by the force of the wind. They do not break.

Through the smoke of the fire, I could see the slow rush of the Ottawa River and on its noble cliff, Parliament Hill. Samuel de Champlain wrote in his journal on June 14, 1613: “the savages call it Asticou, which means

kettle.” The waterfalls that gave the land its name are no longer there. Today, most call this Algonquin territory Victoria Island, home of Attawapiskat Chief Theresa Spence. A woman who, through her hunger strike – still ongoing at time of writing – is inspiring thousands of people to march for Indigenous rights in the social movement now known as Idle No More.

The grassroots movement brings to light three main goals: the process of decoloni-zation by Indigenous peoples, the reversal of federal omnibus Bill C-45, and the union of Indigenous people and their allies in a collective, nationwide movement. Omnibus Bill C-45 amends 64 acts or regulations, including the Indian Act and several acts regulating natural resource extraction. Many of the reforms will allow the federal government to streamline projects and profit from Indigenous territories.

Text: Hera Chan | Photos: Laurent Bastien Corbeil | Illustration: Amina Batyreva

features The McGill Daily | Thursday, January 17, 2013 | mcgilldaily.com 9

A fellow Daily editor and I arrived on the island the morning of January 11 – one month after Chief Spence began her hunger strike. There was a demonstration planned for that day and buses were already arriving from all over the country with people ready to walk the short distance to Parliament Hill. The Ontarian band chiefs had convened the day before in Ottawa’s Delta hotel to dis-cuss whether or not to negotiate with Prime Minister Stephen Harper. This was our sec-ond attempt at getting past the camp gates; a media blackout that had begun the previ-ous Monday kept journalists like us out. We came as students instead, leaving recorder, notebook, and camera behind. (Thus, I won’t be talking about the demonstration inside the camp.)

Before entering the camp, my colleague and I spent a good ten minutes idling among the parked cars, unsure how to respectfully approach a movement we felt was not ours. A woman wearing traditional indigenous regalia approached us and introduced her-self. She laughed with us and chatted ami-cably about where she was from. “Go make your observations inside,” she said.

A gatekeeper to the camp told us that the media blackout was imposed because of the harm mainstream media had done to the movement. He had been on the island since the first day of Chief Spence’s hunger strike.

Since December 11, Chief Spence has been the face of what has been described as a battle between Indigenous peoples and the Canadian government. On January 7, in the thick of the movement, the govern-ment leaked an audit of Attawapiskat that had been filed on September 20, 2012. The accounting firm Deloitte emailed Chief Spence and the Department of Aboriginal Affairs stating, “an average of 81 per cent of files did not have adequate supporting documents and over 60 per cent had no documentation of the reason for payment.” The federal government provided approxi-mately $104 million to the Attawapiskat band council between April 1, 2005 and November 30, 2011. There are approximate-ly 3,000 members of the Attawapiskat com-munity. The funding per person annually would amount to little under $6,000 and must provide for education, infrastructure, housing, and administration. According to NDP MP Meghan Leslie’s teach-in last week at Dalhousie University, the federal gov-ernment spends around $14,000 on a non-Indigenous Canadian to fulfill these needs.

“The mainstream media has been very important to the movement...in particular mainstream media’s poor coverage of the movement,” Howard Ramos, a Dalhousie professor who specializes in Canadian Aboriginal mobilization, told me over the phone. In her column for the National Post, Christie Blatchford referred to Spence’s hunger strike spurring “the inevitable cycle of hideous puffery and horse manure that usually accompanies native protests swirls.” Ramos noted that the average Canadian’s lack of understanding coupled with the confusing message put forth by the press has generated a lot of interest.

Melissa Mollen Dupuis, co-organizer of the Quebec Idle No More chapter, says current coverage in alternative media sources is a drastic change, however, from the reporting on the 1990 Oka Crisis. When the Quebec town of Oka tried to push residential development and build a golf course onto the Mohawk community of Kanesatake, including on an ancestral

burial ground, community members and supporters armed themselves and erected a barricade blocking the construction. The protesters were met with the Sûreté du Québec and eventually the military, result-ing in a two and a half month standoff. No shots were fired by either side. According to Dupuis, the media “demonized” the indig-enous community and people who partici-pated in road blockades. “We’re always told we’re damn savages,” she said. Dupuis sees hope in the reporting from more alterna-tive news sources, particularly supportive media from blogs and Twitter.

“You cannot pass judgment on what you see on television if you cannot even name the 12 nations on which you live,” Dupuis told me with laugh. “[Idle No More] is like a bushfire. The wood was dry and ready to burn.”

***

As we left the Idle No More rally on that Friday and drove into Montreal, we found another Idle No More demonstration. Some protesters had constructed an immense Kaswentha or Two Row Wampum belt, a representation of the original covenant between the settler Europeans and the Haudenosaunees, the “people of the long-house.” The Wampum belt is comprised of two rows of purple that run parallel on a bed of white. One row of purple represents the canoes of the Haudenosaunee and the other row represents the ships of the then-coming Europeans, running parallel but not crossing paths.

That was how Kakwiranó:ron Cook explained the Kaswentha to me at the First Peoples’ House of McGill. Cook is the Aboriginal Community Outreach Coordinator and Career Advisor and works across Canada recruiting students to come to McGill. He is my first real teacher on Indigenous issues.

The island of Montreal is known in Mohawk as Tiohtiá:ke or “where the people split or parted ways.” McGill University itself sits on a former Iroquois settlement. The only relic of a former indigenous existence is the Hochelaga Rock by the Roddick Gates. I fol-lowed Cook around the First Peoples’ House looking at Wampum and distinguishing band councils from traditional councils. Cook’s father is Mohawk and his mother is Dakota. He says to truly understand what needs to change, we must first understand the great diversity of indigenous communities and rec-ognize how people wish to be identified.

Four years ago, McGill began asking students to self-identify as North American Aboriginal, which includes but may not be limited to First Nations, Inuit, Métis, Non-Status, Native American, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian, when applying to the University. Out of 37,000 students at McGill, currently 150 (.04 per cent) of students have self-identified under this category, despite a 45 per cent growth in Canada’s indigenous population between 1996 and 2006.

“You have to wonder, is it because McGill isn’t a friendly place for indigenous students,” said Erin Linklater, a U3 Political Science student. I sat down in the First Peoples’ House with Linklater, a citizen of Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation. Linklater said she couldn’t believe there wasn’t an Indigenous Studies program at McGill when she first got here. “Taking a Canadian politics course here, you’ll have one little chapter on indigenous issues and you won’t talk about indigenous issues ever again in

The McGill Daily | Thursday, January 17, 2013 | mcgilldaily.com10 features

the whole class,” she said.In an immediate sense, Idle No More is a

concerted effort against the federal govern-ment’s ongoing colonialism in indigenous communities, and an attempt at nationwide Indigenous solidarity. As protests continue into a second month, the movement may also serve as a wake up call for larger institutions to recognize the plight of Indigenous commu-nities, as well as the Canadian education sys-tem’s utter lack of knowledge about them.

***

In the 2013-2014 academic year, McGill will offer a minor concentration in Indigenous Studies, but Cook feels that it will be a long time until McGill implements a major or establishes an institute similar to those at University of Victoria or the University of British Columbia. Jessica Dolan, a McGill PhD student currently writing her dissertation on Haudenosaunee environmental philosophy, said that part of the solution could be simply having more Indigenous people here. “If an institution encourages more indigenous pro-fessors, more Indigenous students, more peo-ple in general to be interested in the whole history of North America rather than certain parts of it, then there is going to be a synergis-tic effect that alters the pedagogical leaning of the University,” she said.

Linklater and Dolan are great comrades and advocates for Indigenous issues. They clarify each other’s sentences and remind each other of points they forgot to make. Linklater was once part of a campaign against Indigenous appropriation around Halloween; Dolan is organizing an Idle No More teach-in as a post-graduate student to be run later this month.

Linklater’s general advice for McGill is to recognize the combined history to make way for a very different shared future. “I think that is a form of respect and I don’t think it would go unnoticed,” she said. When I asked her about whether McGill participates in the ongoing colonial process of Indigenous people in Canada, she replied “there’s one sense in which I might change going to [the] University but there’s [another] sense that I might change the institution by being here.”

***

Founded by Nina Wilson, Sylvia McAdam, Jessica Gordon, and Sheelah McLean, the Idle No More movement is in its second month and may continue for longer. The movement has found other leaders in Melissa Mollen Dupuis and Widia Lariviere in Quebec. Others con-tinue to utilize social media platforms to keep the Idle No More fire burning. Professor Ramos said to me, “the status quo is not sustainable.”

That morning on Victoria Island, as I stood on my toes to catch sight of Chief Spence, the only thing that cut through the cold were the sounds of song and drum. If the administra-tors of the federal government were to wel-come Indigenous communities – as my col-league and I were welcomed into the camp – this place we call Canada would carve out a different landscape against the scope of vast blue. As we gathered there that morning ready to set out, and a freezing rain seeped through jackets and headdresses alike, the organizer simply said, “our people have been through worse” than the Ottawa winter. People contin-ued to ask each other where they were from, and answer with Seneca, Cayuga, Oneida, Onodaga, Mohawk.

Idle No More is offering an education to the world. It is only the inauguration of a jour-ney we as people can traverse together. The Canadian federal government might be in for a long winter, because as was proclaimed that morning, it has “awoken the spirit of a spiri-tual people.”

The McGill Daily Health&ed iiThursday, January 17, 2013

mcgilldaily.com

Invisible scarsBrain-related sports injuries linked to dementia and depression

B oston University (BU) has a bank stocked with brains: the “Brain Bank” at it’s

Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy houses brain and spinal cord tissue of deceased athletes and military personnel. Within a few years, the bank has collected dozens of donations, most notably from former profes-sional hocky and football athletes. Concussions and other forms of brain trauma are common in these professions, and the centre studies the effects such incidents have on health. Through their donations, athletes hope to help uncover the long-term consequences of this severe brain trauma.

According to the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), concussions account for 20 per cent of all injuries in ice hockey, and only slightly less in rugby, football, and soccer. Ambitious athletes begin playing their sport of choice as young children, before their brains have fully developed. Without care-ful precautions, concussions can swiftly accumulate and the effects of repetitive brain injury can be quickly compounded. The more concussions one has, the more sus-ceptible they are to another and the worse the concussion is likely to be.

A recent study of 85 brains at the Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy found that four out of every five were afflicted with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). The devas-tating symptoms of CTE, which are thought to include depression and dementia, are caused by the abnor-mal accumulation of tau protein which leads to tissue death. The damage is irreparable, and CTE itself is incurable.

It is unfortunate that most research on CTE must currently be conducted post-mortem. The spinning, rapid acceleration, and jolted stops that cause the brain to bump violently against the skull (causing concussion) often leave few obvious external signs. It is only after mental health is notice-ably impaired, or after death, that the full extent of the damage is known. NFL linebacker Junior Seau is the most recent in a series of athletes who have committed suicide and been subsequently diagnosed with CTE.

Yes, the sample that BU researchers studied was a narrow one. Brains are most often donated by individuals who not only have suffered brain trauma, but who also already display symptoms of CTE. However, the findings help

establish that there is a definite link between repetitive head trau-ma and long-term brain diseases like CTE.

Steps have been made by major regulatory bodies to reduce the prevalence of head injuries. The NHL, for example, now requires players to get immediate medi-cal attention if they suffer a blow to the head. But athletes must still be proactive when it comes to injuries. Dr. Scott Delaney, a physician and consultant to the Montreal Alouettes, made clear in a MUHC “HealthBeat” radio interview that doctors are “still dependent on a very basic thing…the athlete coming forward to vol-unteer his or her symptoms.”

Further changes to the rules in the NHL made all intentional and

targeted blows to the head illegal, and the rules regarding “boarding,” the act of pushing or checking a player into the boards surrounding the ice rink, were made more strin-gent. Detractors, like the colourful sports commentator Don Cherry, continue to glorify the unnecessary violence of the game – even when faced with evidence that fighting, and associated head injuries, have been linked to depression and the early onset of dementia. It is this culture of competitive con-tact sports that often encourages an athlete to continually shrug off their symptoms, leading to several undiagnosed concussions that may have long-term consequences.

A few concussions will not lead to CTE, but any sort of head injury requires proper treatment. Rola

Abouassaly, a senior physiothera-pist at the Sports Medicine Clinic of the McGill Sports Complex, stresses the importance of “having athletes be educated” as to what a concussion is. “Some people don’t think they have a concussion,” and don’t realize that their dizziness or trouble concentrating may be linked to a recent head injury, she explained. The treatment for any trauma is sufficient rest in order to allow the brain to recuperate. Excessive brain stimulation should also be avoided – perhaps a difficult task for a McGill athlete.

Awareness campaigns like those carried out by the Montreal Children’s Hospital stress the importance of educating athletes. Their “Trauma Concussion KiT,” available online, includes tech-

niques for diagnosing a concussion as well as information on symptoms and sports-specific guidelines.

Further preventative tools are also in the works. An iPad app devel-oped by Jay Alberts, a researcher at the Cleveland Clinic, aims to help coaches and athletes diagnose concussions if a physician is not nearby. A Canadian startup known as ShockBox has developed helmet sensors to detect the severity of a hit. The sensors are commercially available, and the company hopes to have them on every NHL helmet in the future, as they should be – the major leagues serve as inspira-tion to young athletes. When ath-letes speak out, with their words as well as their actions, taking care of your brain can become cool as well as common sense.

Jassi Pannu Health & Education Writer

Illustration Amina Batyreva | The McGill Daily

health&edThe McGill Daily | Thursday, January 17, 2013 | mcgilldaily.com12

What’s up with McGill’s advanced standing policy?Students face challenges transferring advanced standing credits

S imilar to many graduates of CEGEP and the A-Level system, graduating from

the International Baccalaureate (IB) program granted me the dubious honour of ‘skipping’ my first year at McGill based on the advanced standing cred-its I received. I couldn’t believe I was exempt from an entire year of university. When faced with the impending prospect of graduation, the scenario now looks quite different. The lack of a freshman year robbed me of the chance to explore differ-ent courses and prospects, as well as the transition period to adjust into a four-year program before tackling more challeng-ing U1 courses.

A closer look at the process, however, has made me further question the impact of the IB on my transition to university aca-demic life. The summer before commencing my McGill degree, I found out that I was to receive 10 credits per Higher Level sub-ject I did, in which I surpassed a certain grade level. This meant that for my three Higher Level classes – English, History and Film Studies – 30 credits were automatically exempt from my degree in Political Science and International Development.

This is an odd framing of policy considering that Higher Level IB subjects may not even have any relevance to your degree at McGill. This is espe-cially pertinent for students in the Faculty of Arts, since few IB subjects directly over-lap with the more challenging content studied in university Arts courses. When it comes to Introductory Biology or Math, course content may be com-parable to material covered high school, and thus more easily transferable. Advanced standing also doesn’t take into account the grade students received on their Extended Essay – an in-depth research paper written in the last year of the IB. The latter is argu-ably the only component of IB that directly transfers over to the development of the skill of higher education essay writing.

A fellow IB graduate who wished to remain anonymous had a similarly frustrating expe-rience to recount: “Although I received credit for most of the classes that were a prerequisite for a Math major, the material covered in introductory McGill math classes is very different and far more challenging than what I studied in the IB. While I tried registering in one of

these fundamental courses, and even spoke with an advisor, I was forced to withdraw half-way through the course, due to the credit I received for Higher Level Math in the IB.”

The McGill system for award-ing academic standing, there-fore, is lacking in a number of ways. Unlike many schools in the U.S. or the University of Toronto, at McGill we have no choice in whether we wish to transfer credits for registration or not. When it comes to core courses such as Calculus or Intro Biology, this might make sense. It’s ultimately unfair to students who are truly novices in prerequisite material to have to compete with students who have covered similar material in high school. But when it comes to the Arts disciplines, there is very little equivalency between, for example, history at the high school level and political

science at the undergraduate level. The exemption of Arts students based on high school curriculae which only vaguely overlap with f irst year courses at McGill is not only arbitrarily decided, but ultimately cre-ates gaps in our accumula-tion of base knowledge, which needs to happen early on in our degrees to help students cope with more challenging 300- and 400-level courses.

Understanding the momen-tum of the semester is an impor-tant part in adjusting to univer-sity life, but not everyone has had the opportunity to do so prior to entry into their McGill degrees. Both CEGEP and IB students, for instance, can enter McGill with similar amounts of credits trans-ferred forward. Conversely, the IB is a two-year program in which ones studies six different subjects with a comparatively less special-ized focus than in CEGEP, where

students are already exposed to four-month-long semesters with courses specific to their chosen fields of interest.

It’s clear that advanced stand-ing policies are created with the intention of being in the student’s best interest. Allowing students to enroll in classes with mate-rial they have already covered and mastered is unfair; it’s both a waste of the students’ and the professor’s time. Introductory classes are big enough as it is, and so in many ways this is an important policy, but that doesn’t mean the process is unequivocal-ly fair or successful. Furthermore, being pushed into choosing a major early on in your degree, with little to no exposure to both your courses of interest and the courses available, only serves to constrain students’ options.

Criticisms of these advanced standing policies are usually expressed by the

select groups of students who feel l imited by them, not by every student who has received advanced standing in some form; a fair number of students would l ikely claim that advanced standing has improved their experience.

In an ideal situation, though, McGil l would a l low some degree of student input in determining whether or not the student has a suf f icient level of competence in both the ski l ls and knowledge required to complete their degrees. Blanket policies based on the curr iculae provided by inter-national high school programs don’t work in the case of every student; having the choice to decide for ourselves, at least to a certa in extent, would greatly benef it those who feel they need the f lex ibi l ity of a four-year program to develop their potentia l.

Nirali Tanna Health & Education Writer

Illustration Amina Batyreva | The McGill Daily

The McGill Daily culture i3Thursday, January 17, 2013

mcgilldaily.com

The art of conversationMile End talk show Parc Avenue Tonight

T he Montreal Gazette’s Bill Brownstein has called it “a postmodern talk show.” CBC

radio describes it as “a very, very, low-budget version of The Tonight Show.” Creator and host Dimitrios Koussioulas proposes an alterna-tive epithet, describing his project as “the kind of show South Park kids would do.”

“Parc Avenue Tonight” is a new web-based micro talk show based out of Mile End. Koussioulas and his pro-ducer, Natalie Vansier, explain their show as a way to get to know Mile End’s familiar faces, to “discuss noth-ing in particular with the people we see everywhere, but don’t necessar-ily know a lot about.” The first eight episodes, all available online, include guests ranging from taxidermy-art-ist Kate Puxley, Rastafari food dis-tributor Stretch, Mexican restaurant Tachido co-owner Mariano Franco, to filmmaker Matt Silver.

The “Parc Avenue Tonight” ven-ture is just one of the manifestations of the natural curiosity that dictates Koussioulas’ life. When I first met him last summer, he had a job tend-ing a posh bar on Parc. Before this bartending gig, Koussioulas dab-bled in film animation, copy writ-ing, advertising, and art dealership. He’s already exploring future possi-bilities, including a return to adver-tising, writing a book, and, most intriguingly, waste management. But for now, Koussioulas is invested in the talk show world.

“Parc Avenue Tonight,” with its candid and casual style, provides an alternative to the increasingly preva-lent argumentative talk show model. “Those are the worst,” Koussioulas emphasizes. “The View is the worst. It’s a nightmare show.” The “Parc Avenue Tonight” team tried to keep every aspect of the show as straight-forward as possible, in some cases to Koussioulas’ chagrin. “I wish I was wearing makeup, man,” he laments. “You can see some shine, man.” But overall, Koussioulas has a pretty good gig: he sits behind his desk – wearing his suit and tie uniform – asking the questions he wants while sipping brandy and smoking throughout the show. The empha-sis on natural ease doesn’t prevent Koussioulas from delivering zing-ers to his bemused (and sometimes taken-aback) guests. In one episode, after listening to Puxley describe her creative process, Koussioulas jumps right in with one of his characteristi-cally cheeky lines: “I like that you’re attractive and you do gross stuff.” But it’s all in good spirit for Koussioulas, who simply loves conversation. The show reflects the team’s desire to

bring back, as Vansier puts it, “dis-cussion for the joy of conversation.” In a time where politically cor-rect and highly informed opinions seem de rigueur, many people have grown reluctant to declare a strong conviction, especially to a relative stranger. But unlike many prolific orators, Koussioulas is perhaps an even better listener. “When’s the last time I heard an opinion, man?” Koussioulas laments. “I haven’t heard an opinion in months.”

And Koussioulas wants to hear your opinion on (nearly) everything. Just don’t talk to him about your next vacation or where you’re going for dinner. These are the type of worn-out topics Koussioulas desperately avoids. The show itself was born of a desire to offer an alternative to the promotional veneer of most popular talk shows, by steering people away from the conventional interview. Koussioulas attributes this to his own forgetfulness, as he reports fre-quent memory lapses when it comes to straightforward questions. Be that as it may, Koussioulas’ offbeat ques-tions seem for the most part to catch his guests off guard, lending a fresh-ness to their answers. He largely glosses over career-related prompts, sticking to jaunty questions that can border on the absurd, but delve beneath the surface of their pub-lic personas. Franco, for example, is much more than an owner of Tachido restaurant – he is also an avid figurine collector. Puxley is more than a taxidermist – she is also the wife of an Italian opera singer.

The 16 episodes making up the first season were filmed over ten days this past summer in Koussioulas’ Parc Avenue apartment. The continuity of the interview is preserved in an effort to communicate immediacy and authenticity.“ A couple of our guests were hesitant to be on the show,” Koussioulas explains, “because they were afraid to be spliced into some weird monster.” The episodes, which usually last between ten and 15 min-utes, were each filmed in a single take, which avoids the possibility of mis-representative editing. “It’s just going through,” Koussioulas emphasizes. “If you’re a fuck up, you’re a fuck up.”

So why the Mile End? “Montrealers are made to believe we’re sec-ondhand international citizens,” Koussioulas says. “So if you do something in Montreal, you kind of presume nobody is going to see it.” A Montrealer born and raised, Koussioulas wanted to find a way to communicate his enthusiasm for his hometown. Restricting the show’s scope to Mile End allows for an in-depth look at the neigh-bourhood’s demographic. Mile End was an ideal fit for a micro show for the producers, who were in search of self-fashioned celebrities, both local and international. “In the Mile End you don’t need real celebrities,” Koussioulas jokes. “Everybody acts like a celebrity, everybody is ready to be a celebrity. We chose every-body based on looks,” he adds, grinning. “We’re from the Mile End too. That’s the truth.” With the three members of the “Parc Avenue

Tonight” team living in close prox-imity to their guests, the show occasionally takes on a slightly self-deprecating tone. Viewers include less Mile End folk than expected, as YouTube stats show people across Canada and the U.S. tuning in. Koussioulas attributes this to an “underestimating of how much self-loathing the [Mile End] cool have.”

The show is already promis-ingly popular, leaving its producers pleasantly surprised. “It’s kind of like we’re drug dealers,” Koussioulas offers. “We’re like here, you like this, you want more in your veins? Maybe you should hire us.” Parc Avenue Tonight has also garnered a surpris-ing amount of praise from main-stream media, and producers have been approached by advertisers. “I wish we had known so many people would watch it,” says Koussioulas. “We might have done it differently.”

Vansier points out that the chal-lenge with web television is getting people into the rhythm of watching the new episode every Thursday. But the “Parc Avenue Tonight” team sees the silver lining to its underfunding. “Without any money we can be as lazy as we want, which is true Mile End spirit,” Koussioulas argues. “Being a good creative person is doing the least amount of work possible.”

This doesn’t mean the team doesn’t have an eye for details. “No one’s asked me about the bananas yet!” Koussioulas exclaims when I bring it up. Koussioulas offers a banana to his guest at the end of each episode. “Instead of having a time sig-

nal,” Vansier explains, “I’d wave him a banana.” Koussioulas recounts how he used to draw banana and apple car-toons for a girl he loved. “I draw car-toon bananas really well. I love banan-as. It’s my favourite fruit.” Vansier and Koussioulas promise to clear up the banana myth when filmmaker Mark Slutsky comes in on January 17 to demonstrates how to peel a banana.

Bananas aside, where exactly does “Parc Avenue Tonight” fall on the spectrum between journalism and entertainment? Admittedly, the project seems to have taken off at a somewhat lackadaisical angle. But their approach appears to have shift-ed somewhere along the way. “What you have to prove with a talk show,” Koussioulas explains, “is that you can be interesting: be random and spontaneous; have something to say everyday.” After asking so many silly questions in an attempt to avoid the blatant self-promotion of many talk show guests, Koussioulas seems to have discovered that these silly ques-tions were, after all, not all that silly. “Parc Avenue Tonight” reminds its viewers that what makes individuals unique tends to lie in the seemingly mundane details. Their probing inter-views reveal multifaceted characters, making guests appealing as bizarrely fascinating – and ultimately real – peo-ple. Whether the Parc Avenue Tonight team knew they would come up with these attention-grabbing portraits is unclear, but it works. Beyond appeal-ing to their viewers, the results seem to have taken the creators themselves by surprise.

Nathalie O'NeillThe McGill Daily

Photo Courtesy of Parc Avenue Tonight

cultureThe McGill Daily | Thursday, January 17, 2013 | mcgilldaily.com14

A rebuke to empty patriotismMeek’s Cutoff, a revisionist Western

Nothing makes me lose my appetite like American poli-ticians and their nauseat-

ing patriotic rhetoric. I was happy on November 6, not only because Mitt Romney lost, but because the bullshit that had clogged media outlets and kept my stomach in a constant state of queasiness would finally come to an end.

With the presidential inaugu-ration and the State of the Union address approaching, however, my Twitter feed will once again fill with quotes of the hope, strength, and spirit of the American people.

This weekend, to give my ten-der stomach a rest, I decided to skip out on schmaltzy new releases like Lincoln. Instead, I saw direc-tor Kelly Reichardt’s latest film,

the pseudo-Western Meek’s Cutoff (2010), which, despite its low bud-get, boasts big names like Michelle Williams and Paul Dano.

Reichardt’s previous fea-tures, River of Grass (1994), Old Joy (2006), and Wendy and Lucy (2008), all deal with protagonists that are lost in life in present-day America. Characters seek freedom and redemption on the mythologi-cal American highway or frontier, only to find that it no longer exists.

Meek’s Cutoff, in contrast, deals with characters that are literally lost in America. The film follows a band of settlers and their guide, Stephen Meek, as they attempt to cross the High Desert of Oregon in 1845, but become hopelessly disoriented in the infinitely shifting, starkly beau-tiful landscapes of the West.

Now, Westerns are usually the stuff that American political rhetoric is made of. In its classical form, the Western dramatizes and resolves the conflict between two oppo-

sitional values within American ideology: on the one hand, civiliza-tion, community, and family; and on the other, individualism and freedom of the frontier. Obama similarly attempted to resolve this conflict in his acceptance speech, saying, “while each of us will pur-sue our individual dreams, we are an American family and we rise or fall together.”

Luckily for me, Meek’s Cutoff belongs to a group of films called Revisionary Westerns, which, since the 1960s, have been breaking down American ideology faster than politicians can rebuild it.

Meek’s Cutoff juxtaposes the mythology of the Western with the grim reality of pioneering, suggest-ing that the freedom of the frontier only ever existed in our imagina-tions. Instead of offering the pio-neers freedom from societal con-straints, the bleak landscapes play host to the relentless persistence of cultural norms. The settlers encoun-

ter a Native man, and struggle over whether to kill or enslave him. The female pioneers are consistently relegated to scrubbing dishes and darning socks, while the men make decisions just out of earshot.

Meek’s Cutoff also specifically critiques the filmic Western, invok-ing its tropes only to debunk them. Meek, the iconic, ruggedly mascu-line cowboy, spouts as much rheto-ric about American freedom as any politician. His authority is consis-tently undermined, however, as his claim to know the West like the back of his hand amounts to noth-ing, and the settlers grow more and more disoriented. When the fabled standoff occurs, it doesn’t take place between two cowboys, but between the Native man, a woman, and Meek.

Without the structuring ide-ology of the Western, the film’s narrative structure collapses, and the viewers become as hopelessly lost as the settlers. Meek’s Cutoff

eschews traditional plot structure in favour of slow, subtle move-ment, so that, thinking back on the film, it becomes impossible to order the events. The seemingly directionless plot is emphasized by the film’s unnavigable physical spaces. The heavily disorienting cinematography makes austere, marker-less landscapes even more confusing for the audience than it is for the settlers.

If Reichardt’s previous films ask how to live in present-day America, Meek’s Cutoff asks how to make an American narrative film when you no longer believe in America. So if you, like me, are sick of being told to have faith in the Star-Spangled Banner, Meek’s Cutoff is just what the doctor ordered.

Lilya HassallForays into Film

Heart foodWhy people wait for a taste of Kazu

If there is a line up, then it must be worth the wait. Located at 1862 Ste. Catherine West, right

at the corner of St. Marc, a unique Japanese restaurant has gotten Montreal’s food enthusiasts talking and passers-by intrigued. Locals and tourists line up for it, and peo-ple all over the world who tried it write about it. A fan from London commented on Kazu’s Facebook page: “I miss you from London...Kazu has gone international!”

So, what is so special about Kazu? What makes people willing to wait at the line up for 15 to 40 minutes, and why do they keep coming back?

Étienne Clément, a student of Asian cultures and languages at UQAM, is trying to get in to Kazu for the fifth time. The hype and the line up drew him here, but the line itself is also the reason why he is still wondering what Kazu is all about. After thirty minutes of waiting on a busy Sunday night, he walked away once again with-out getting to feed his curiosity.

However, unlike Clément, the loyal Kazu fans out there like Aaron Neifhoff, a Political Science student at McGill, whom I also met in line, have relived the Kazu experience several times: “I’ve been here many times before.

The food is incredible, because it’s really authentic and I really like the character of the place,” Neifhoff said.

Dubbed the best Japanese restaurant in Montreal by many delighted customers and known for its originality, it quickly gained popularity through word of mouth and positive reviews online after opening on March 1, 2010.

When I asked Chef Kazuo Akutsu, founder and owner of this restaurant, what is so special about Kazu, he simply said, “Heart food.” Curious, I also asked if he knows how popular his restaurant is on the internet and how every-body is talking about it, he replied in his thick Japanese accent, laughing, “No. I don’t know. I don’t have time to check.”

For starters, Kazu does not serve sushi. Instead, you’ll discov-er Japanese food you won’t find anywhere else in the city, such as their famous shrimp burger, grilled salmon head, and Kazuo’s favourites: pork neck; their salm-on and tuna bowl, which is served with salad and topped with crispy rice noodles; and their home-made sake ice cream – all made with Kazuo’s meticulous delicacy.

I asked Kazuo why he doesn’t serve sushi, tow which he replied, “I need an ocean, but there is no ocean.”

Illuminated with Japanese lanterns, the first things you will notice at Kazu are the menus,

which are handwritten with mark-ers on white sheets of paper. They are posted on the walls where patrons can easily read them. The place itself is tiny and low-key. Everybody sits elbow-to-elbow with one another at the bar or at small tables. The friendly waitstaff wear jaunty kerchiefs. Demonstrating his commitment to his tiny but remarkable restaurant, Kazuo is often is at the bar cook-ing with his sous chefs, greeting

both new and regular customers. A must-order dish at Kazu is

the Japanese version of bibimbap, a Korean dish. Served with rice, fried egg, and salad, the tender, juicy marinated beef rib will defi-nitely make you want to order a second round. As for dessert, the homemade wasabi ice cream, which came from Kazuo’s imagina-tion when he was thinking about a spicy ice cream, is a must-try. It is made for food adventurers.

Although the wait may be long, the service is undeniably fast. The average price for a dish ranges from $10 to $25, but with $20, you can still enjoy a full meal followed by dessert. The menu may be a bit pricey for students on a budget, but Kazu must be on the “try list” of every would-be McGill foodie.

Margie RamosCulture Writer

Kazu is located at 1862 Ste. Catherine West.

Dishes at Kazu benefit from simple but elegant presentation.

Lilya Hassall is a U3 Cultural Studies student. Forays Into Film and Feminism is a bi-weekly column about alternative films, why she likes them, and where to see them.

Photo Margie Ramos

volume 102number 25

editorial board3480 McTavish St., Rm. B-24

Montreal, QC H3A 1X9

phone 514.398.6784fax 514.398.8318

mcgilldaily.com

coordinating editorQueen Arsem-O’Malley

coordinating@mcgilldaily.com

coordinating news editor Juan Camilo Velásquez

news editorsLaurent Bastien Corbeil

Lola Duffort

commentary editorsJacqueline Brandon

Steve Eldon Kerr

culture editors Kaj Huddart

Hillary Pasternak

features editorChristina Colizza

science+technology editor Anqi Zhang

health&education editor Ralph Haddad

sports editor Evan Dent

multimedia editor Kate McGillivray

photo editor Hera Chan

illustrations editor Amina Batyreva

design&production editorsEdna Chan

Rebecca Katzman

copy editorNicole Leonard

web editor Tom Acker

le délit Nicolas Quiazua

rec@delitfrancais.com

cover designAmina Batyreva

contributorsJessica Barudin, Hannah Besseau,

Lindsay Cameron, Julia Devorak, Carla Green, Lilya Hassall, Esther Lee,

Michael Lee-Murphy, Mona Luxion, Nathalie O’Neill, Jassi Pannu, Margie

Ramos, Farid Rener, Nirali Tanna, Evan Vassallo, Dana Wray

All contents © 2012 Daily Publications Society. All rights reserved. The content of this newspaper is the responsibil-

ity of The McGill Daily and does not necessarily represent the views of McGill University. Products or companies advertised in this newspaper are not necessarily endorsed by Daily staff.

Printed by Imprimerie Transcontinental Transmag. Anjou, Quebec. ISSN 1192-4608.

3480 McTavish St., Rm. B-26Montreal, QC H3A 1X9

phone 514.398.6790fax 514.398.8318

advertising & general manager Boris Shedov sales representative Letty Matteo

ad layout & design Geneviève RobertMathieu Ménard

dps board of directorsQueen Arsem-O’Malley,

Erin Hudson, Rebecca Katzman, Michael Lee-Murphy, Anthony Lecossois, Matthew Milne,

Sheehan Moore (chair@dailypublications.org), Joan Moses, Farid Muttalib, Shannon Palus, Nicolas Quiazua, Boris Shedov

EDITORIAL 15

NEWSCOMMENTARYCULTUREFEATURESSCI+TECH HEALTH & EDSPORTSMULTIMEDIAPHOTOILLUSTRATIONSDESIGN&PRODUCTIONCOPYWEB

news@mcgilldaily.comcommentary@mcgilldaily.comculture@mcgilldaily.comfeatures@mcgilldaily.comscitech@mcgilldaily.comhealthandeducation@mcgilldaily.comsports@mcgilldaily.comradio@mcgilldaily.comphotos@mcgilldaily.comillustrations@mcgilldaily.comdesign@mcgilldaily.comcopy@mcgilldaily.comweb@mcgilldaily.com

CONTACT US

For meeting times, check the “Contribute” tab at mcgilldaily.com

Late last year, former Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin remarked, “we have never admitted to ourselves that we were, and still are, a colonial power.” Perhaps retirement has allowed Martin more time to reflect on the state of Indigenous relations in Canada, or perhaps the Conservative government’s arrogant and negligent attitude toward Indigenous peoples forced Martin’s hand. Regardless, his words – still rarely heard in main-stream politics – are not the lone musings of an old politico. His sentiment fits alongside those of tens of thousands across Canada who are mobiliz-ing as part of the Idle No More movement.

In the movement’s own words, “Idle No More calls on all people to join in a revolution which honours and fulfils Indigenous sovereignty which protects the land and water.” The call has been heeded by drumming flash mobs, highway and rail blockades, and countless rallies across the country. These peaceful actions are the signs of a grassroots movement intent on building Indigenous sovereign-ty and protecting the environment from irreversible damage. Despite being less than two months old, the movement has attracted international atten-tion. Over 700,000 tweets using the #IdleNoMore hashtag have been posted since December 10. The movement is forcing Canadians to confront both an ongoing colonial heritage and the actions of the current Conservative government.

The Idle No More campaign was started by four women in response to the Conservatives’ introduction of omnibus Bill C-45 to Parliament in October. The 457-page bill, which received royal assent on December 10 and is now known as the “Jobs and Growth Act, 2012,” contained changes to the Indian Act, Navigation Protection Act, and Environmental Assessment Act. These changes remove environmental protections for 99 per cent of the rivers and lakes in Canada and have drasti-cally reduced the number of development proj-ects that require environmental assessment. They also make it easier for the federal government to gain access to treaty lands and territory; protected indigenous land is often seen as red tape in the way of the government’s economic plans.

Idle No More, in protesting changes that bear consequences for all Canadian people, has

nevertheless been met with resistance, much of it stemming from calculated misinforma-tion spread by the government. Politicians and pundits discuss the ‘threat’ posed to Canadian sovereignty by Indigenous movements, and time and again the myth that Indigenous com-munities freeload off the state is trotted out to disguise the truth: First Nations mismanage funds no more than non-Native municipalities, and the de facto subsidies often run from terri-tory to federal state, not the other way around. Moreover, despite mining, logging, and hydro-electric companies generating billions of dollars in profit from First Nations land – money that falls into the hands of the federal government in the form of taxes and royalties – annual gov-ernment spending per capita averaged about $7,200 for First Nations residents, yet $14,900 per capita for residents of Ottawa, according to 2005 numbers cited by the Media Co-op.

The recent politically-motivated leak of an audit of the Attawapiskat reserve highlights the negative attitude of the current Conservative government, which treats Indigenous peoples as opposition that needs to be silenced, rather than citizens to be served. How else to account for the low priority status accorded First Nations resi-dents, a policy that has dire human consequenc-es. Canada has the world’s largest supply of fresh water, but over 100 Indigenous communities have tap water so dirty they are under continual boil alert. In the far north, the rate of tuberculosis is 137 times greater than the rest of the country.

Yet the more politicians fall into the hands of mining and logging companies, the more the newspapers buttress the Conservatives’ desper-ate defence of injustice, the more the pundits decry Idle No More’s “vast and ill-defined agenda, its vague and shifting demands, its many differ-ent self-appointed spokespersons,” the more it becomes clear that the alternative future being pointed to by Idle No More – one of respect for Indigenous sovereignty and respect for nature – is considerably preferable to a status quo that will surely be condemned by history.

—The McGill Daily Editorial Board

Idols of colonialism, no more

Illustration Edna Chan | The McGill Daily

The McGill Daily compendium! I6Thursday, January 17, 2013

mcgilldaily.com

lies, half-truths, and our design editors are the best looking ever

Knowledge complete, say academicsAll further investigation will be repetition

A cademics around the world have announced that knowledge is now com-

plete, and that all further inquiry into problems will not be necessary.

The findings were announced at an award ceremony simultane-ously held at Harvard, Oxford, and Beijing Universities last night, and mark the end of humanity’s search to discover and under-stand the mysteries.

Speaking at the ceremony at Oxford, Professor Roger Scruton, noted Conservative and aesthetics fan, said that, “It is with great plea-sure that I announce that knowl-edge is now complete. The ques-tions have been answered, and the sums have been done. If it isn’t in a book now, then it simply isn’t a thing....Also I was right when I told the progressives we didn’t need to broaden the admissions pool. ”

The announcement has been met with surprise in some quar-ters of the Academy, as it emerges that several thousand academics believed they were still working at problems that needed to be solved.

“I must say this has come as a surprise,” said John McDonald, Professor of Children’s Literature at the University of Sinkingship. “I

thought my work toward a herme-neutics of the centipede in early 1905 Northern Irish children’s lit-erature would add to humanity’s total knowledge, but it appears that it has either already been done, or doesn’t count as a thing that people need to know.”

“I have clearly not been pay-ing attention,” said Mortono Fendelson, Professor of Silence-Is-Bliss at McGall University. “I thought my work was still of use.”

Other academics have wel-comed the news, and suggested that given that they “did their job, like, 100 per cent” they should be “richly rewarded in this life and all of the lives with tokens of your apprecia-tion and yachts and other gifts, that it is becoming of inferiors to donate to their natural superiors.”

Meanwhile theoretical physicists are baffled by the announcement, coming as it does while they are still searching for the mysteries of the universe and creation using large pieces of equipment.

“We have been building some very expensive machines, some very fucking expensive machines,” said William B. McAlfred, Head of Finding-the-Answer at C.E.R.N. “We have put those very fucking expen-sive machines deep in the ground, deep under rock and dirt, which is itself not an inexpensive venture. We have since been looking at these

machines literally non-stop for the last year, and trying to make the num-bers, which are very big and hard to count – numbers with lots of digits to the right of the decimal point – add up. This has not been easy, and we haven’t succeeded yet. But apparent-ly we needn’t have bothered....[yes] this is quite a surprise.”

When quizzed on how the completion of knowledge could have happened with physicists still busily attempting to discover the origin of the universe and purpose of life – problems which are surely important to solve – McAlfred was baffled.

“I don’t know. We must have left the answer in a book somewhere.”

Philosophy departments have been sent into a wild neo-existen-tial tailspin by the news.

“If we already have it, then why do we have questions? We must have left the answer somewhere. But if we did that, and we don’t know where, then are we allowed to ask where we left the answers? But that’s a question. Is the answer buried in our mind? Is that a ques-tion? Fuck,” said Harvard Professor and Pathetic Apologist for Empire John Rawls, before exploding into a haze of question marks and itali-cized words.

Of course, some academics are dismayed that the comple-tion of knowledge renders all

their hopes and dreams futile and totally worthless.

“I knew I couldn’t be another Foucault,” said Dr. Angajo. “I knew I wasn’t destined to revolution-ize my field and provoke a new generation of academics to take up difficult ethical and historical questions...but...I just thought I could do my bit. I’m devastated. I just hope there is another uni-verse out there that needs knowl-edge...but then, if there is we’d already know about it. Help.”

Some of the most disappointed academics hail from China, a coun-try which has never won a Nobel Peace Prize despite “giving the West

such a huge leg up back in the day.”“Papermaking, the compass,

gunpowder, and printing, but no Nobel,” said one Chinese academ-ic who declined to be named. “It is time.”

In other news, McGall Principal Heatha Mama-Boom has announced that, despite the solution to all of the problems universities were only created to solve, McGall would be increas-ing the number of upper admin-istration roles next year.

“Just because I’m leaving doesn’t mean we can’t keep spending your money on fine 1948 Bordeaux,” said HMB.

Euan EKThe Twice-a-Weekly

McGill releases Statement of Values and Principles Concerning Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Peaceful Assembly

D ear members of the McGill Community and Market place:

We would like to thank those of you who took the time, to share your opinions concern-ing the Protocol Regarding Demonstrations, Protests and Occupations. Your comments on the substance of the document and on the process itself were thoughtful. There was no unanim-ity on changes being sought, can you believe!

We write today to tell you that as a result of these consultations, it has become evident that further discus-sion on this complex issue would be useful means of pacifying you, and, that in addition to written submis-sions, different types of exchanges on this matter such as song and dance would be welcome before final decisions will be made.

As well, in further reviewing best practices in this realm, we

have come to an understanding that the McGill community will be best served by an agreed-upon statement of values and principles agreed upon by us, rather than a protocol of operating procedures, which, by definition, must be sensi-tive to context and determined by judgement and reason and rational-ity and basic moral principles.

As such we have prepared a Statement of Values and Principles Concerning Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Peaceful Assembly that we have outlined below.

1. McGill values academic integ-rity. As such all students are required to pay a new $500 “plagiarism” fee, so that we may catch cheats.

2. McGill values frank and open discussion on matters of aesthetic expression. We invite all members of the university community to donate money toward the ongoing beautification of campus.

3. McGill values its students, and

prides itself on providing them with the best work-experience possible. To join the alumni donation team, call 555 398 9999.

4. McGill values diversity and peaceful assembly. As such, will be diversifying both our investment portfolio and assembling a greater number of senior administration positions starting in September.

5. McGill values transparency. Starting in September, all students are required to declare all politi-cal affiliations on their application form and all political activity will be recorded on their transcript.

6. McGill values inclusivity. We accept Canadian Dollars, American Dollars, Australian Dollars, British Pounds, the Euro, and Japanese Yen.

7. McGill values sustainability. We promise to sustain our use of resourc-es as long as students keep paying.

8a. McGill values freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. We will be opening a dedicated

“protest zone” on the other side of the mountain in August this year.

8b. The creation of this zone will necessitate the creation of a $100 non-opt-outable Freedom and Liberty fee.

9. All protests will accord with the principle of “between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. or else.”

10. All protests will accord with the principle of “economists know best.”

11. A corollary to 10. (and 7.) is that any occupations will be filmed and sold as reality television shows to fund extensive use of private jets.

12. Excellent protesters will receive course credit. Protesters must sign an attendance sheet to receive this credit.

These guidelines will of course be subject to the same usual rigor-ous consultation program. Dates and venues for the renewed consul-tation process will shortly be made available, but they have tentatively

been set for April 14 to April 30, for your convenience. The process will include consultation fairs and the creation of an open website allowing all positive comments to be posted completely unedited, for consumption by members of the University community. We urge members of Conservative and Liberal McGill to participate in this important process.

Following the consultation period, the Statement of Values and Principles Concerning Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Peaceful Assembly will be brought to Senate and the Board of Governors for final deliberations when we deem the time is right.

We look forward to watching you jump through hoops over the next months.

Sincerely,Princess Di Anna, Vice-Principal

(Counting and Adding Up)Manthony C. Assi, Silliest

Illustration Amino Acid | The Twice-a-Weekly