56

Voice evaluation

  • Upload
    osias

  • View
    49

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Voice evaluation. TOpics. Definition of the terms assessment, evaluation and diagnosis The screening process for voice disorders Medical Evaluation for Voice Disorders Assessment, Evaluation and Diagnosis for Voice Disorders by the clinician. Definitions. Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Voice evaluation
Page 2: Voice evaluation

Definition of the terms assessment, evaluation and diagnosis

The screening process for voice disorders Medical Evaluation for Voice Disorders Assessment, Evaluation and Diagnosis for

Voice Disorders by the clinician

Page 3: Voice evaluation
Page 4: Voice evaluation

Assessment The process of collecting relevant data for

clinical decision making Evaluation

It’s an appraisal of the implications and significance of the assessment

Diagnosis Making a decision as to whether a

problem exists, and if so, differentiating it from other similar problems.

Page 5: Voice evaluation
Page 6: Voice evaluation

The Boone Voice Program for Children (Boone, 1993) Addresses respiration, phonation and

resonance Is appropriate for students in all

grades Natural samples of voice and speech Simple three-point system

Page 7: Voice evaluation

The Quick Screen for Voice (Lee, Stemple and Glaze, 2005) Addresses respiration, phonation and

resonance Is appropriate for students from

preschool through high school Samples of spontaneous conversation,

picture description, imitated sentences, recited passages, counting and other natural samples of voice and speech

Page 8: Voice evaluation
Page 9: Voice evaluation

All patients/clients with voice disorders must be examined by a physician.

The physician’s examination may occure before or after the voice evaluation by the clincian.

Page 10: Voice evaluation

Only the decision about whether to begin voice therapy need be deferred until all medical information is obtain.

On completion of the medical examination, its is equally important for the laryngologist to communicate the findings to bout the patient and the referring clinician.

Page 11: Voice evaluation

Physical examination should include: General physical condition A thorough ear, nose and throat

evaluation Visual inspection of the larynx !!!

Mirror laryngoscopy Endoscopic laryngoscopy

Page 12: Voice evaluation
Page 13: Voice evaluation

The clinician’s role: Describe the structure and function of

the larynx Make recommendations regarding

Further testing needed to understand the etiology of the voice problem

Maintenance of the voice problem Treatment

Page 14: Voice evaluation

The clinical process of the voice assessment: Review of auditory and visual status Relevant case history Standard and nonstantndardized

methods Use of noninstrumental and/or instrumental

measures Perceptual ratings, acoustic analysis,

aerodynamic measures, electroglottography and imaging tech

Page 15: Voice evaluation

The clinical process of the voice assessment: Selection of standardized measures for

documented ecological validity Monitor voice status and ensure support

for patient

Page 16: Voice evaluation
Page 17: Voice evaluation
Page 18: Voice evaluation
Page 19: Voice evaluation

Includes: Behavioral observation The oral-peripheral mechanism

examination Auditory-perceptual assessment Quality of life in persons with voice

disorders

Page 20: Voice evaluation

1. Behavioral observation

This tells more about patients than their histories and assessment data.

We can see: Extremely sweaty palms Avoid eye contact with people Use excessive postural changes Demonstrate facial tics

Page 21: Voice evaluation

2. The oral-peripheral mechanism examination

Examination of the face, oral and nasal cavities and pharynx is also required. Mandibular restriction (下颌回缩 ) Unusual downward or upward

excursion of the larynx during the production of various pitches

Page 22: Voice evaluation

3. Auditory-perceptual assessment

Factors might influence judgment The natural of the speaking task Listener experience and training The type of rating method used

GRBAS CAPE-V(the Consensus Auditory

Perceptual Evaluation of Voice)

Page 23: Voice evaluation

3. Auditory-perceptual assessment

GRBAS(Hirano, 1981) G(grade):the overall severity of voice

abnormality R:rough B:breathy A:aesthenic(weakness) S:stain

A four-point system

Page 24: Voice evaluation

3. Auditory-perceptual assessment

CAPE-V(Kempster,Gerratt, 2008) 2 specific psychometric properties:

Visual analog scales Unanchored

6 aspects of voice: Overall severity Roughness Breathiness Strain Pitch loudness

Page 25: Voice evaluation

4. Quality of life in persons with voice disorders

Includes: Overall health-related quality of life Communication-related quality of life

Page 26: Voice evaluation
Page 27: Voice evaluation

Includes: Laryngoscopy Acoustic analyses Aerodynamic measurements Electroglottography

Page 28: Voice evaluation

1. Laryngoscopy

Appropriately trained clinicians may employ indirect laryngoscopy and other laryngeal visualization techniques

Page 29: Voice evaluation

2. Acoustic analyses

Valid acoustic measurements can: Discrimination Positive correlation Sufficient stablilization

Page 30: Voice evaluation

2. Acoustic analyses

5 acoustic properties of the vocal signal: Frequency Intensity Perturbation Sound spectrography Signal(or harmonics)-to-noise ratio

Page 31: Voice evaluation

2. Acoustic analyses

Frequency Speaking fundamental frequency(SFF)

Average F0 Frequency variability

F0.SD Phonational frequency range(PFR)

Maximum phonational frequency range(MPFR)

Voice range profile(VRP)

Page 32: Voice evaluation

2. Acoustic analyses

Intensity Habitual intensity Intensity variability

Int.SD Intensity(dynamic)range

From softest nonwhisper to loudest shout Voice range profile(VRP)

Page 33: Voice evaluation

2. Acoustic analyses

Perturbation Jitter Shimmer

Short-term cycle-to-cycle Nonvolitional variability

Page 34: Voice evaluation
Page 35: Voice evaluation
Page 36: Voice evaluation

2. Acoustic analyses

Sound spectrography Harmonic structure of the glottal sound

source Resonant characteristics

Narrow-band filtering Good frequency resolution

Wide-band filtering Good time resolution

Page 37: Voice evaluation

2. Acoustic analyses

Signal(or harmonic)-to-Noise Ratio: The lower the HNR, the more noise there is

in the voice Correlates well with the perception of

dysphonia

Page 38: Voice evaluation

3. Aerodynamic Measurements

5 acoustic properties of the vocal signal: Lung volumes and capacities Air pressure Airflow Laryngeal resistant Durational measures

Page 39: Voice evaluation

3. Aerodynamic Measurements

Lung volumes: Tidal volume Inspiratory reserve volume Expiratory reserve volume Residual volume

Page 40: Voice evaluation

3. Aerodynamic Measurements

Lung capacities: Inspiratory capacity Vital capacity Functional residual capacity Total lung capacity

Page 41: Voice evaluation

3. Aerodynamic Measurements

Air pressure: cm H2O Inside lungs Below the vocal folds

Indirect measure by /p/ Inside oral cavity

Page 42: Voice evaluation

3. Aerodynamic Measurements

Airflow: CC or mL Glottal resistance to airflow Breathy vowel – higher airflow Strained-strangled voice - lower airflow

Laryngeal resistance: Repeat /pi/ at a rate of 1.5 syllables/sec

Peak intraoral pressure - /p/ Peak airflow - /i/

Page 43: Voice evaluation

3. Aerodynamic Measurements

Durational measures MPT S/Z ratio

Page 44: Voice evaluation

4. Electroglottogrphy

EGG: Noninvasive Tech An estimate of VF contact patterns

Page 45: Voice evaluation
Page 46: Voice evaluation
Page 47: Voice evaluation
Page 48: Voice evaluation
Page 49: Voice evaluation

A Complete Example

Page 50: Voice evaluation
Page 51: Voice evaluation
Page 52: Voice evaluation
Page 53: Voice evaluation
Page 54: Voice evaluation
Page 55: Voice evaluation
Page 56: Voice evaluation