VLF & MAG SUR ERICHSEN L PROP€¦ · Figure No. l - Location Map 3 Figure No. 2 - Claim Sketch 4 Figure No. 3 - Regional Geology Si Mineral Occurrences 5 PREVIOUS wo..;; 6 PHYSIOGRAPHY

S3B15NEa0M 53B15568821 N. CARIBOU LAKE 010

REPORT

ON

VLF-EM AND MAGNETIC SURVEYS

ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTY

DISTRICT OF KENORA, PATRICIA MINING DIVISION

NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO

MOSS RESOURCES LTD.

FOR

635479 ONTARIO LTD.

RECEIVED

F t; B i ;i 1986

MINING WNDS SECTION

January, 1986 H.J. Hodge, P.Eng.

53B15NEMM 53B15SE8e21 N. CARIBOU LAKE010C

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0 8.0 9.0

10.0

11.012.0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

SUMMARY l

INTRODUCTION 2

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2

LOCATION, ACCESS AND SERVICES 2

Figure No. l - Location Map 3

Figure No. 2 - Claim Sketch 4Figure No. 3 - Regional Geology Si Mineral Occurrences 5

PREVIOUS wo..;; 6PHYSIOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION 6

REGIONAL GEOLOGY 6PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION 7DESCRIPTION OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY PROGRAM 8

RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION 9

10.1 MAGNETIC SURVEY 9

10.2 VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY 10

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14

REFERENCES 15

APPENDICES

A: Certificate of Qualification

B: Technical Data Statement(back of report!)

Drawing No. 1

Drawing No. 2

Drawing No. 3

VLF-EM Survey - Inphase

Quadrature Profiles

Magnetometer Survey -

Vertical Field Readings

Magnetometer Survey -

Vertical Field Contours

(map pocket) ]

1.0 SUMMARY

The following report describes results of VLF-EM and Magnetic

Surveys carried out over the Erichsen Lake property of Moss Resources Ltd. for 635479 Ontario Ltd. in November and

December, 1985.

This property is located 100 miles north of Pickle

Lake. Access can be gained by float plane from Pickle Lake

or from Weagamow Lake, 40 miles to the west. A winter road

has been constructed into the Musselwhite property from

Highway 808, and provides winter access to within 20 miles

to the south of the property.

The property lies on the south limb of a synclinal fold which parallels the North Caribou greenstone belt along

its central core. It straddles a northwest-southeast contact

between metasediments on the northeast, occupying the core

of the syncline,and metavolcanics on the southwest. This

contact is marked by a band of iron formation which trends southeasterly through the property of Eldor Resources Limited,

which the Erichsen Lake property encompasses. Gold has

been found on the Eldor property in association with the iron formation.

Results of the geophysical surveys indicate at least 18 conductive zones representing iron formation, sulphide

mineralization and shear/fault zones. Folding of the iron

formation-sulphide zones is indicated in several localities

on the property.

The property is considered to have good potential for

economic gold deposits, and a comprehensive two-phase exploration

program is recommended. Phase I should consist of detailed

geological mapping, prospecting and geochemical sampling, and will cost an estimated $40,000. Phase II should consist of diamond drilling.

- 2 -

2.0 INTRODUCTION

This report describes results of VLF-EM and Magnetic

Surveys carried out over the Erichsen Lake property of Moss

Resources Ltd. for 635479 Ontario Ltd. in November and December,

1985.

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

The Erichsen Lake property consists of 54 claims located

off the northeast end of North Caribou Lake. The claims

are recorded on the Ministry of Natural Resources Erichsen

and North Caribou Lakes claim sheets (G-2029 and G-2147),

Patricia Mining Division, Kenora District. The claim numbers

and recording dates are shown below.

Claims

Pa 836425 to 836456 inclusive 32 claims



TOTAL 54 claims

Recording Dates

July 8th, 1985

July 8th, 1985

July 8th, 1985

The claims are wholly owned by Moss Resources Ltd.

804-34 King Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5C 1E5.

4.0 LOCATION, ACCESS AND SERVICES

The property is located 100 miles north-northwest of

Pickle Lake, 180 miles northeast of Red Lake, 40 miles east

of the Weagamow Indian Reserve No. 87. Access to the property

can be gained by float-or ski-equipped aircraft from Pickle

Lake, Red Lake, and Weagamow Lake.

A winter road from Highway 808 to the Muss^lwhite gold

property, 20 miles to the south, provides winter road access

to the area.

M!4^-:.^ n n /*\ D P D T V

/ C.^ 1 \\ OPAPIMISKAN LAKE î ̂ X~t* ^'"^^

^j-.j^sl^ri-.'S.jv.' V"

t

l ,~\ r?* LAKEx*--—i-i x-—' V'' ,-I R ED LAKE 'f''^ ? *~~*^^ '--l'' ~~~S CC) ".—~, ^''

^•-___.^ J V~-"J^ ^' ^ ,-'x''~~5-''~'-t-t'"--~' -NJ. *^"" ' ~ -1 -- -I-'' ii?/

PICKLE

O N T A R

KENORA ,^ , ~^ f'

-,r'^ -V^BP"::;^VVM'ATTABI

MOOSONEE

f"-' TIMMIN^

KIRKLAND

UNITED

STATES

'I'-' Greenstone Belts

(OOmiles d

MOSS RESOURCES LTD.


Patricia M.D., Ontario

LOCATION MAP

8364J9 636430 l 636431

r —t— -4—--'8364350-*!

/^1^}J____ ^.

636442 1636443) 836*44 j 836445

' . J~ ———— i ——— ji~ T

636448) 836447 | 636446

l l----f---

836473 l 636472 l 636471 ^636470 l 836469

- ——4. ———— 4-- ——— 4-—————4-————4.--- I l

63647* ! 836477 ! 83647S 836479 836460

MOSS RESOURCES LTD.fflS.,J\\ERICHSEN LAKE PROPER!

Patricia M.D., Ontario

CLAIM SKETCH

OEOCANEX LTD TORONTO, CANADA

'45

MOSS RESOURCES LTD

VAN HORNE GOLD EXPLORATION INC

NORTH CARIBOU-OPAPIMISKANNEAWAGANK LAKES

GREENSTONE BELTREGIONAL GEOLOGY

AND MINERALOCCURRENCES

ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTYGEOCANEX LTD

TORONTO. CANADA

Metovolca.ncs

Mefasediments r~" l i Stoked ground

Moss Resources Ltd

Vcn Horne Gold Exploration Inc

Granitic intru e Metamorphic Opapimiskan

LakeMUSSELWHITE DEPOSITS DOME-INCO-ESSO- LACAIMAIron formation

4- 3.0OO.OOO tons 01 7oz7ton Au

Gold occurrences

ForesterLake

i— -j——i Synclinal FoldLo.xj-S

(T) Musselwhite deposit

'1) Teol prospect(3) Agutua Arm prospect

(4) Centre Loke prospect(5) Eyopomikamo Loke Mo, F prospect

(5) Opapimiskan Lake prospect(T) Neawagank Lake .orospect

@ L ibert Lake prospect(9) Sage Loke prospect@ Stanley Loke prospect(ij) Seeseep Lake prospect

o ^n —52 0 30

- 6 -

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK

Government reconnaisance mapping by Satterly (1939)

at l inch to l mile, Bartlett et al (1985) at l inch to

\ mile, an aeromagnetic survey (ODM-GSC, 1960) at l inch

to l mile, and a Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines

Airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey (1986), constitute

the only significant recorded work on the property to date.

6.0 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION

The property is generally flat, and consists of interspersed

northeast trending, forested, low, glacially derived hills

with wet swamps. Outcrop is generally sparse.

7.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The Erichsen Lake property is located in the north-

central portion of the North Caribou-Opapimiskan-Neawagank

Lakes greenstone belt. Due to the relative remoteness of

the area, the belt has not been extensively worked by mining

and exploration companies. Most of the available geological

information on the area is from government funded geological/

geophysical surveys. The Ontario Geological Survey is currently

involved in the second year of a three-year geological/geophysical

survey of the area, manned by staff from the Precambrian

Geology, Engineering and Terrain Geology, and Mineral Deposits

Sections .

The belt forms part of the Sachigo Subprovince which

is composed of several small, irregularly-shaped sequences

of supracrustal rocks. The rocks in this subprovince are

evolutionarily distinct and probably older than the rocks

in the Uchi and Wabigoon subprovinces to the south (Bartlett

et al, 1985). The belt forms an arcuate, horn-shaped assemblage

- 7 -

of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks which have been

synclinally folded about an axis approximately conincident

with Eyapimikama Lake (Satterly, 1941). The syncline is

rimmed by mafic volcanics on the north and south, and filled

with trough, cross stratified, epiclastic accumulations

in the axial portion. Two fairly continuous bands of iron

formation and chemical sediments mark the contacts between

the volcanics and sediments (Bartlett et al, 1985). Regional

geological maps indicate that the belt is bounded by paragneiss

and migmatized rocks in the north, and felsic intrusives

in the west and south (Map 2292, Big Trout - North Caribou

Lake).

The entire belt extends from Weagamow Lake in the north

west to Opapimiskan Lake in the southeast. South of Opapimiskan

Lake the belt bifurcates into two major lobes; one lobe

extending south through Libert Lake, the other through the

Forester and Neawagank Lakes areas.

8.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

There has been no detailed geological mapping on the

property. Reconnaissance mapping by the Ontario Geological

Survey (Bartlett et al, 1986 and Satterly, 1939), indicates

that the property lies on the south limb of a major synclinal

fold which axis parallels the belt. The property straddles

a northwest-trending contact between mainly metasediments

on the northeast, and metavolcanics on the southwest.

Airborne magnetics (Map 80730) indicate that this contact

is marked by iron formation which trends southeasterly through

the claims held by Eldor Resources, which are encompassed

by the Erichsen Lake claims.

- 8 -

Gold mineralization is known to occur on the Fldor

Resources property where diamond drilling has indicated

several auriferous zones associated with the iron formation.

No assays are reported.

9.O DESCRIPTION OF THE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY PROGRAM

The linecutting and geophysical surveys were carried

out between November 27th and December 3rd, 1985.

The surveys were conducted on northeast-southwest picket

lines at 450-foot intervals off base lines northeast and

southwest of the Eldor Resources claims. Total line miles

of grid was 50.9 miles (81.4 km).

The magnetic survey utilized a Scintrex MF-2 fluxgate

magnetometer with a reading resolution of 10 gammas on

the low range scale. Diurnal changes were estimated by

taking repeat readings at designated base stations at time

intervals not exceeding 1.5 hours. Readings were taken

at 100-foot intervals and 50-foot intervals over anomalous

areas.

The VLF-EM survey utilized a Geonics EM-16 receiver

tuned to receive 21.4 KHz. Readings of In Phase and Quadrature

were taken at 100-foot intervals along all lines, and at

50-foot intervals over anomalous areas.

Results of the magnetic and VLF-EM surveys are shown

on Drawings Nos. 1,2 and 3 at the back of this report.

- 9 -

Breakdown of the personnel and dates of the program are given below.

NAME AND ADDRESS

J. Robert, Amos, P.Q. C. Darveau, Amos, P. Q. R. Darveau, Amos, P.Q. R. Champagne, Amos, P.Q. R. Gilbert, Amos, P.Q. M. Lariviere, Amos, P.Q. F. Recoskie, Vald'or, P.Q. D. Recoskie, Vald'or, P.Q. C. Beggs, Toronto, Ont. J. Hodge, Devlin, Ont.

TYPE OF WORK

LinecuttingLinecuttingLinecuttingLinecuttingLinecuttingLinecuttingMagnetic SurveyVLF-EM SurveyVLF-EM SurveyParty Chief-Magnetic Survey

DATES

Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.

27th27th27th27th27th27th27th27th27th27th

- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.

3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,

1985198519851985198519851985198519851985

10.0 RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

10.1 MAGNETIC SURVEY

i

Property magnetics generally reflect bedrock stratigrapljiy

trending northwest-southeast across the property.

Generally higher magnetics, southwest of the

Eldor Resources property, reflect greater concentration

of magnetic minerals in the metavolcanic rocks compared to i

the area northeast of the Eldor claims which are underlain \

primarily by metasediments .

The strong magnetic high (up to 5,300 gammas)

on line 60 west at 32 south,represents the main banded iron

formation which crosses southeasterly through the Eldor property, i

marking the approximate location of the metavolcanic-meta- |

sedimentary contact.

In the southwest portion of the property numerous,

somewhat discontinuous, magnetic highs, up to 5,000 gammas,

indicate probable lean oxide facies (magnetite) and/or sulphide

facies (pyrrhotite, pyrite) iron formation. In several

- 10 -

locations, such as in the area of 20 west, 72 south, distinct

curvatures in magnetic high trends suggest isoclinal folding.

In the northeast sector of the property, a number

of parallel., northeast-southwest trending magnetic features,

generally lows, indicate bedrock structural lineaments, possibly

faulting. These features may persist southwestward southwest

of the Eldor property; however, they are somewhat less distinct

in that area because of higher magnetics in the metavolcanics.

10.2 VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

ZONE A - This is a moderate-to-weak conductor

which is approximately 1,600 feet long. Amplitudes are

generally small except on line 8 west where the peak-to-

peak amplitude is 49/i. Anomaly width suggests a deep

source. There is no direct magnetic correlation

although slightly elevated magnetics occur near the

southwest end of the conductor. This zone may be due

to non-magnetic sulphides and/or graphite, or possibly

shearing with minor sulphides.

ZONE B - This is a weak, three-line conductor

with maximum peak amplitude of 44/i. It is associated

with a slightly elevated magnetic anomaly, and in all

probability, represents a bedrock zone, possibly weak,

magnetite iron formation or sulphide mineralization.

ZONE C - This zone is also a short, weak conductor

which occurs immediately northeast of the Eldor property.

It occurs on the north flank of a weak magnetic feature

and may be slightly transgressive to it. It may represent

a shear zone with sulphides.

- 11 -

ZONE D - This is a moderate, well-defined three-

line conductor which occurs just north of the main iron

formation on the Eldor property. It is associated with

a magnetic high, and probably represents iron formation.

It is in line with Zone C and may be a continuation of

that zone across the Eldor claims and hence, may

represent a shear zone.

ZONE E - This is a strong conductor which weakens

to the northeast off the property. Peak-to-peak

amplitudes on line 60 west is 8770 . This conductor

is associated directly with a magnetic high which

represents the main iron formation band which trends

southeasterly through the Eldor property.

ZONE F - This is a very weak conductor with

maximum amplitude of 2570 . It is broad, suggesting a

deeper source or possibly a conductive source in the

overburden. There is no apparent magnetic correlation.

An apparent offset occurs on line 44 east.

ZONE G - This is a weak-to-moderate conductor

with an on-property strike length of 800 feet. An

In Phase reversal occurs on line 52 east. This

conductor is associated directly with a magnetic high

(over 2,000 gammas) and both terminate abruptly between

line 40 and 44 east. This conductor is probably

caused by lean, magnetite iron formation and/or sulphides.

ZONE H - This is a long variable conductor

which extends from line 8 west for 4,000 feet off

the property to the southeast. It is associated

direcfy with a magnetic high, and the strongest seg

ments of the anomaly occur with the maximum magnetic

readings. The conductor is particularly strong

- 12 -

between lines 8 and 20 east where maximum peak-to-

peak amplitude is 727.. This is probably caused by

sulphide mineralization with possible lean, magnetite

iron formation.

ZONES J, K AND L - These are very weak con

ductors which are all associated with the same magnetic

zone which extends discontinuously across the property.

Zone K is slightly transgressive and may reflect folding.

The magnetic intensity, which reaches 5,200 gammas in the

northwesternmost line, 40 west, indicates that this zone

represents lean, oxide facies and/or sulphide facies

iron formation.

ZONE M - This is a weak-to-moderate conductor

which is associated directly with a magnetic feature

suggesting pyrrhotite-rich sulphides or lean, magnetite

iron formation.

ZONE N - This is a short but well-defined

strong conductor with peak-to-peak amplitude up to

83/i. It appears to be slightly transgressive to poorly

defined magnetic features and may represent a massive

sulphide zone or possibly a graphitic zone. Also, its

relationship to Zones O and P may represent tight,

isoclinal folding in this area.

ZONE O - This is a weak conductor which also

appears to be slightly transgressive to magnetic

features and possibly to bedrock stratigraphy. It

probably represents a weak sulphide zone, possibly

associated with shearing.

- 13 -

ZONE P - This zone is a moderate, but poorly

defined, conductive zone which is parallel to Zones

N and O. It shows a poorly defined correlation with

a magnetic high, and probably represents sulphides.

ZONE Q - This is a generally weak conductor

which has an on-property strike length of 4,000 feet.

It is stronger on its northwest segment, and at its

southeast end, where it converges with Zone P. It is

associated in part with poorly defined, discontinuous

magnetic highs and probably represents a sulphide

zone with possibly minor magnetite. It may represent

the south limb of a fold which closes southeastward

with Zone P.

ZONE R - This is a short, weak conductor which

trends northwest-southeast,transgressive to the

property stratigraphy. It has no apparent magnetic

correlation. It may represent a shear zone or possibly

a s urficial conductor.

ZONE S - This is a weak conductor which is

associated with a rong magnetic feature. It probably

represents lean iron formation.

ZONE T - This zone is a slightly stronger

two-line conductor which appears to be transgressive

to the same strong magnetic feature with which Zone S is associated. It probably represents shearing;

however, it could represent a folded segment of Zone S.

- 1A -

11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Results of the VLF-EM and Magnetic Survey indicate that

the Erichsen Lake property flanks the main iron formation

band which trends southeasterly through the Eldor property.

At least 18 conductive zones have been identified on the

property, many of which are indicated to be caused by sulphides

and lean iron formation. Several represent transgressive

shear or fault zones, and there is an indication in several

localities that tight, isoclinal folding of the sulphide/iron

formation bands are a strong probability.

A set of parallel, northeast-southwest structural lineaments

are indicated by the magnetics, particularly in the northeast

portion of the property, where the magnetic intensity is

stronger in the metasediments. However, these lineaments

are indicated to persist into the metavolcanics in the southwest

portion of the property.

This combination of iron formation, sulphide mineralization

and structural complexity, provides excellent potential for

localization of gold deposits on this property, similar j

to the Musselwhite property, 20 miles to the south, and along

the same stratigraphic trend. Gold has been found on the

property of Eldor Resources, which is surrounded by the Moss property

A comprehensive exploration program is recommended to ;

investigate the gold potential of the property. This should

be a two-phase program starting in Phase I with detailed l

geological mapping, prospecting, and geochemical sampling,

to be followed by Phase II diamond drilling.

The estimated cost of Phase I is S40,000.

Respect

H.J. Hodg"

- 15 -

12.0 REFERENCES

Bartlett, J.R,, Breaks, F.W., Dekemp, E.A., and Shields, H.N.,1985. Precambrian Geology of the Eyapimikama Lake Area (Opapimiskan Lake Project), District of Kenora (Patricia Portion); Ontario Geological Survey, Map P. 2834, Geological Series - Preliminary Map.

Ministry of Natural Resources, 1983. Nap 2292; Big Trouc Lake -North Caribou Lake, Geological Compilation Series, l inch to 4 milp.s.

North, J., and Higginson, R., 1985. Report on Geological Mapping,Lithogeochemical Sampling and Prospecting, Stanley Lake Property; Private Report, Moss Resources Ltd.

Ontario Department of Mines-Ontario Geological Survey, 1960.Map 919G; North Caribou Lake, l inch to l mile.

Ontario Geological Survey. 1986. Opapimiskan Lake Area,Airborne Electromagnetic Survey. Total Intensity Magnetic Survey, District of Kenora, Patricia Portion.

Satterly, J., 1939. Geology of the Windigo - North CaribouLakes Area; ODM, Vol.48, part 9, pg. 1-32.

Thurston, P.C., Sage, R.P., and Siragusa, G,M., 1979. Geologyof the Winisk Lake Area, District of Kenora, Patricia Portion; OGS Report 193, pg. 61-86.

T

APPENDIX A

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION

I, HARRY J. HODGE, of the City of Toronto, in the Province

of Ontario, do hereby certify that:

1

2

I am a consulting geologist, employed by Geocanex Ltd.

I am a member in good standing of the Association of

Professional Engineers of the Province of Ontario.

I graduated in 1959 from St. Francis Xavier University

with a Bachelor of Science degree, and I have been

practicing my profession as a geologist for 26 years.

My report is based on a personal examination of the

property in 1985, and upon a diligent search and

review of all available pertinent technical data

published by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources,

and in the Assessment Records Libraries in Sioux

Lookout and Toronto; as well as private company reports

In this report I have disclosed all relevant material,

descriptive and interpretive, which is to the best

of my knowledge, necessary to gain a completb under

standing of the viability of the project and the recommendations .

DATED this Vi day ofA O

H.J. Hodge, P.Eng,

APPENDIX B

TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survcy(s).Township or Area RnftK"Caribou

VLF-EM and Magnetic Surveys(G-202% ) LaHe (G-2167)

Claim HoMcr(s) See attached

Survey Company Jack F

Author of Report H. J. HodfeeAddress of Author 80A-34 King St. East Tor. Ont.

Covering Dates of S,.n,ey Nov. 27th - Dec. 3rd, 1985(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line o.t 50.9 line miles-—-————.

SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each

"additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical —Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer— Rndinrnrtrir

-Othrr. ,Onlogiral

Geochemical

DAYS per claim

4020

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provUion crcditi do not apply to airborne lurvcyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic adiometric

DATE: N^fXN 3 \

(enter dayt per claim)

SIGNATURE:/)Aulnaf of Reject or Agent

Res. Gcol.. .Qualifications s** 3 X

Prcvious Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSE! List numerically

See attached(prefix) (number)

3 1

.........

.........

^......,.........

TOTAL CLAIMS. 5A

637 (6/791

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Station* 2,500 Station interval *UU \ J()

l" " 407,

.Number of Readings 3' 400J

0-ine .pacing 400-feet

Profile scale..Contour interval 250'Ranutias

Instrument Scintrex MF-2 fluxgate magnetometer

INDUCED POLARIZATION

UV-H

(2 Zcs

U

Ez? s oerfbw*Jw

fcl0

^k— "

>*—

cr^-c/u.cc

Arrtirary — Srale rnnstant - 10 gammas ;n;,,rna l rm-rrrtinn mrthoH looping In tO base Stations |

Base Station check-in interval (houi Base Station location and value

In,tr..mtnt GeOtlicS EM-16

Poll configuration Verticalrn.Urparatuin Infinity

± 7 7 Acnirary.. ^ '" . . . .Method: (S FixedF^nry 21.4 KH Z NSS

,.\ 1.5 hoursvarious

receiver

transmitter CD Shoot back CD In line CD Parallel line Annapolis, MD. ;

{specify V.L.F. station) Pa ra mMrr. mM M,r^ I n PhaS6 8 nd Quadrature

'inMrurnwit . , .

Sralf rnnstant

rnrrrrtions maHe ,.

Base station value and location

Rlcvatirm accuracy

Instrument

Method D Time DomainPjiramrtcr* — On timr

-Off time.'

— Hrlay timr'— Integration time.

Power ,

171/k/îir^fif* 9 frit \f

Electrode spacing —————————Tynr nt t-\frtrni\e'"' *

O Frequency Domain FrequencyRanê

•l l' M V11 W*"'

A 1

/vV

t 1 . J? /'- -* J

53B15NE8084 53BI5SE8eai N. CARIBOU LAKE 900

^Ministry o f Norlhefn Affairs and Mines

Onianc/

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Gt'ochcmical and Expenditures)

Mining Act

Instruction!: - Please type or print.— If number of minmq claims tjaversed

exceeds space on this form, ottaih a list.Not*; - Only djys credits calculated j m the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." cplumns.

Type of Survey**) To*vnthiri,o

VLF-EM and Magnetic. Surveys Ndrtn"Claim Holder(t)

See attachedAddress

804-34 King St. East, Toronto, Ontario M5C 1E5Survey Company JDaie o) Survey (from St ( oi

Jack F. Hodge j ^ j \}0 ^85 J 3^ ^N*ma end Address of Author (oi Goo-TochntcaJ report)

l.J. Hodge, 804-34 King Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5C

sen. Lake, (6-2029').. Caribou Lake ( G-.ilblProspector l Liconco NJo.

See attached !l

Total Miles of line Cut'

l.Pv5,. i 50.9 . .j .

1E5Credits Rerjuested pur Each Claim in Columns at riqht Minifiq Claims Traversed (List in numerical seciuence)Special Provisions

For first survey;

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter toiails! hore

Airoorne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits ''D not apply to Aiiborne Surveys,

Expenditures (eType of Work Per

Performed on Clai

Cole

PATdjiS);S

mils)

A, 1,1,7^| J

ulation of Expenditure

Total Expenditures

Geophysical ! DfJ" p ttr i Claim

- Elociromagrietic AO

r- Magnolomoter OQ

.R .diom.u,c i

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical j 0W?n"

. E

- M

actromagnottc

agnetomotor

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Gfciochomical

1 Dayt por Claim

Electromagnetic -

Magnetometer

RiQl'Atf'IV

K?V{IJT 5te PI

iiruwa pi\A|in*U to llil

JAM 3 01986

lDays CFedits

S -s-

P.M. Il2i'^!^l^]5

Total Dayj Credits

15 sInstructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right. S

l —————————— ... , , ,, f

Date

Jan. 27/86Certification Ver

Recorded H

X/

oltJof (X**'oon( ItjiOMHtuê)

ymifvinq Report/rffWork ^

l 'tereby ceilify that l have a persona or witnessed same during and/or afier

Name and Postal Address ol

Toronto, On

Mining ClaimPrefix

See

— :.^

îvfiifj/f i14^Ma

wfl^wilciMB^si

"v wiî

.S:;

,,,-i* ' ,

-^.^.jAî.'ii,

Number

attached

M

———————

Expend. Days Cr,

RL: t

r '

m^

^rfr . O^b i ?5

M ,

- 1

f,

1For Office Use Only

Total Days Cr. Date Recorded iR'cordod JfcrfrSor*^ZlliXfo Oato APProvod fl* R*cordod

Mining ClaimPrefix ; Number

lJ7^n^" '

\

#!\- "'

•S

m:l*K . ,

"** ——

iTota tclaim \epor

fe^

^

^

SO

•^-*^

fN1*^

)

nor

- xnumbet^f mining

s cover,odA)V this t of wojV.

Mining RecA'deo'

Orajit

H3^-7^

Ejxpend. Days Cr.

:-

-

5.

i^^--~^—.— __ .^xl2ij~ —— -/' — ̂~~7~

- '

. 1

ând intimate knowledge of the facts sot forth in the Report of Work annexed hWttjfhavmq performed ihe work its completion and the annexed report is truo.

Porion Corning

P. En g, 804-34 King St. Ea st

tario M5C 1E5 ^27^/^6

f'

Ci)rtitioO-Dy Uirfnj/dro)

f/ / f]'CVO i.V.-ji '


List of Claims

J?.

ask

36425 /36426 ,836427 836428

/' 836429 ' 836430 836431 836432 836433 836434 836435 836436 836437 836438 836439 836440 836441 836442 836443 836444 836445 836446 836447 836448 836449 836450 836451

Le

f,H.

t3

l\

MM,1?-IX^lx^ tx JX* ^^ Cx- ex u-tX

tX

iX tx*xt^tXIXotx tX6Xtxtx-

tXtX tx iX

Licence No. K 19788

Pa 836452 836453 836454 836455 836456 836459 836460 836461 836462 836463 836464 836465 336468 836469 836470 836471 836472 836473 836474 836475 836476 836477 836478 836479 836480 836481 836482

|P-/*

1

*

4

\

*

i?

f

;

tXiX txCX LX tX iX IX

4X iX

iXiX l/ is ftx*x-

t̂/ ex^x-tXtx-| i-x-LX-

54 claims

PATRICIA Mlf:*'G DiV.w E 8 E l tf E [fi]

J AN 3 Q 1 936A.M. P.M.


List of Claims

Frank Recoskie Licence No. K 19788

Pa 836425836426836427836428836429836430836431836432836433836434836435836436836437836438836439836440836441836442836443836444836445836446836447836448836449836450836451

Pa 836452836453836454836455836456836459836460836461836462836463836464836465336468836469836470836471836472836473836474836475836476836477836478836479836480836481836482

54 claims

V...


List of Claims

Frank Recoskie Licence No. K 19788

Pa 836425836426836427836428836429836430836431836432836433836434836435836436836437836438836439836440836441836442836443836444836445836446836447836448836449836450836451

Pa 836452836453836454836455836456836459836460836461836462836463836464836465336468836469836470836471836472836473836474836475836476836477836478836479836480836481836482

54 claims

804-34 KING ST. EASJT TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 1E5

(416) 862-9078 iMOSS RESOURCES LTD.

February 13th, 1986

Mr. S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management BranchRoom 6643, Whitney BlockQueen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3

RE: Geological and Geophysical Reports

Dear Mr. Yundt,

Two copies each of the following reports are enclosed

Seeseep Lake Property Geophysical Erichsen Lake Property Geophysical Akow Lake Property Geological Se

Geophysical

I hope that you"have received copies of the related Report of Work for" the above-mentioned properties.

Yours very truly,

MOSS RESOURCES LTD.

\.June M. Hodge Secretary/treasurer

JMH Encl.

SEE ACCOMPANYING MAP(S) IDENTIFIED AS

53B//5 SE- ooji ft /-

LOCATED IN THE MAP CHANNEL IN THEFOLLOWING SEQUENCE

LEGEND

Grid line with I00' stations

Clnjm p ost a nd c laim line

Stream and l akeshore. .

Instrument...............Scmtrex fluxgate MF-2

Values of vertical field! base level of 60,000y

Contour interval................... 25 gammas

25 gamma contour

100 gamma contour

500 gamma contour .C~

Scale l" ; 400feet

MOSS RESOURCES LTD.

ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTYPatricia Mining Division, Ontario

Magnetometer Survey VERTICAL FIELD CONTOURS

B-oo3.\ 4=3 GEOCANEX LTDTORONTO, CANADA

53BI5MEen0*4 53B15SE0e21 N. CARIBOU LAKE 200

LEGEND

C.nd line with I00' stations

Cicim post and claim line ...

Stream and lakeshore

Instrument.................Scintrex fluxgate MF-2

Readings of vertical field ±base level of 60,000d

5OO 1000 1500

Scale l" ^ 400feet

53 B /S" se- o o

MOSS RESOURCES LTD.

ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTYPatricia Mining Division, Ontario

Magnetometer Survey VERTICAL FIELD READINGS

GEOCANEX LTDTORONTO. CANADA

BY: RTDATE: DEC. 1985SCALE: l": 400'DWG. No: Z

53B15NEO0O4 5381555*021 N. CARIBOU LAKE 210

,^

,/A H

/ x

x^vHI ^

-b0 \̂ s. -1 5-' J - x' ~

.M -A ^ l /O--/s 'i y y^ "" i xvi'—— ,V* l ^

t v -\ l ^ X^ -^

\l ^X"

A "\\ r ' *.X\" v Y \ '-x*J " V \ A '-y

v

LEGENDGrid line with I00' stations .

Claim post and claim line ...

Stream and lakeshore.......

Instrument.................. Geo nics E M - 16

Transmitter... ,.NSS , Annapolis, M.D.,21'4 kHz Readings plotted

Profiles at l'^40 0X0j plotted..... Inphase profile .......... ,........

Quadrature profile..............' — --— — — -

Readings taken facing.......... grid north

Conductor axis

Structural lineaments.... .......**v

, l

; ^

Scale l" ; 400feet

MOSS RESOURCES LTD.

ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTYPatricia Mining Division, Ontario\ ;

VLF EM SURVEY Inphase A Quadrature Profiles

BY: R.TM DATE: DEC. 1965SCALE: l": 400'GEOCANEX LTD ———

TORONTO. CANADA JDWG. No: l

53B15NEWM 53B15SEM21 N. CARIBOU LAKE sso

Documents

VLF & MAG SUR ERICHSEN L PROP€¦ · Figure No. l - Location Map 3 Figure No. 2 - Claim Sketch 4 Figure No. 3 - Regional Geology Si Mineral Occurrences 5 PREVIOUS wo..;; 6 PHYSIOGRAPHY