25
Vlada Stankūnienė Aušra Maslauskaitė Marė Baublytė Demographic Demographic R R esearch Center, ISR esearch Center, ISR Lithuania Lithuania International conference “Changing Family: International conference “Changing Family: Demographic Challenges for Social Policy”, Demographic Challenges for Social Policy”, 28-29 November 2007, Moscow 28-29 November 2007, Moscow DIFFERENCES IN PARTNERSHIP AND DIFFERENCES IN PARTNERSHIP AND FAMILY FORMATION FAMILY FORMATION IN LITHUANIA IN LITHUANIA Research was funded by the Lithuanian Science and Studies Foundation

Vlada Stankūnienė Aušra Maslauskaitė Marė Baublytė Demographic Research Center, ISR Lithuania Lithuania International conference “Changing Family: Demographic

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Vlada StankūnienėAušra Maslauskaitė

Marė BaublytėDemographic Demographic RResearch Center, ISResearch Center, ISR

Lithuania Lithuania

International conference “Changing Family:International conference “Changing Family:Demographic Challenges for Social Policy”,Demographic Challenges for Social Policy”, 28-29 November 2007, Moscow 28-29 November 2007, Moscow

DIFFERENCES IN PARTNERSHIP DIFFERENCES IN PARTNERSHIP AND FAMILY FORMATION AND FAMILY FORMATION

IN LITHUANIAIN LITHUANIA

Research was funded by the Lithuanian Science and Studies Foundation

Data

Gender and Generations Survey_Lithuania, 2006

Population Census_Lithuania, 2001

Presentation outline

Marital/partnership status: changes, differencies Partnership/family formation: strategy, differences Turning point to new family formation pattern Conclusions

Decrease of marriage rates

Postponement and “ageing” of marriage

Spread of cohabitation

Increase of never married

Decrease of fertility, etc…

Family transformation

Marital/partnership status

MALES FEMALES

with every younger generation – increase in cohabitation, decrease in marriage among females - high level living without partner

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1985+

1980-1984

1975-1979

1970-1974

1965-1969

1960-1964

1955-1959

1950-1954

1945-1949

1940-1944

1935-1939

1930-1934

<1929

No/never partner No/ever partner Married Cohabitation

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1985+

1980-1984

1975-1979

1970-1974

1965-1969

1960-1964

1955-1959

1950-1954

1945-1949

1940-1944

1935-1939

1930-1934

<1929

No/never partner No/ever partner Married Cohabitation

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1985+

1980-1984

1975-1979

1970-1974

1965-1969

1960-1964

1955-1959

1950-1954

1945-1949

1940-1944

1935-1939

1930-1934

<1929

No/never partner No/ever partner Married Cohabitation

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1985+

1980-1984

1975-1979

1970-1974

1965-1969

1960-1964

1955-1959

1950-1954

1945-1949

1940-1944

1935-1939

1930-1934

<1929

No/never partner No/ever partner Married Cohabitation

R cohort 1930-1939 1 1940-1949 0.984 n.s. 1950-1959 1.735*** 1960-1969 2,014***

R education higher 1 secondary 0.968 n.s. lower sec. 1.610***

R residence rural 1 urban 0.799***

R employment status employee 1 self-employed/ employer 0.785*** unemployed 2.166***.

Relative risk of never marrying MALES

*** p<0,001

Source: GGS_Lithuania, 2006

Rural/low educated/ unempoyed males have relatively „low value“ in the „marriage market“. They are in social and „demographic exclusion“

Lower_sec_rural

Lower_sec_urban

Secondary_rural

Secondary_urbanHigher_rural

Higher_urban

1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69

40

35 30

25 20

15 10

5

0

Never married males: urban/rural by educationPopulation census Lithuania, 2001

Cumulative percentages of first partnershipas marriageMALES FEMALES

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-1959

1960-1969

1970-1979 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-1959

1960-1969

1970-19790

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-1959

1960-1969

1970-1979 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-1959

1960-1969

1970-1979

Cumulative percentages of first partnershipas marriage 1960-1979MALES FEMALES

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-19790

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-19790

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

Cumulative percentages of first partnership as cohabitation, 1930-1979 birth cohorts

MALES FEMALES

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-1959

1960-1969

1970-1979

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-19591960-1969

1970-1979

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-1959

1960-1969

1970-1979

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-19591960-1969

1970-1979

MALES FEMALES

Cumulative percentages of first partnership as cohabitation, 1960-1979

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

1975-79 - 36% 1975-79 - 36%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

1975-79 - 36% 1975-79 - 36%

Cumulative percentages of first marriage/cohabitation/partnership, 1960-79 MALES

partnershipcohabitationmarriage

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-19790

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-19591960-1969

1970-1979

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-19790

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-19591960-1969

1970-1979

Cumulative percentages of first marriage/cohabitation/partnership, 1960-79 FEMALES

marriage cohabitation partnership

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-1959

1960-1969

1970-1979

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

1960-1964

1965-1969

1970-1974

1975-1979

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

1930-1939

1940-1949

1950-1959

1960-1969

1970-1979

partnership/marriage/cohabitation

FEMALES

Cumulative percentages of first partnership

1948-1955 1968-1975

78,9 85,5

70,3

57,5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

First partnership

FP marriage

FP cohabitation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

First partnership

FP marriage

FP cohabitation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

First partnership

FP marriage

FP cohabitation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

First partnership

FP marriage

FP cohabitation

Cumulative percentages of first partnership:partnership/marriage/cohabitation

MALES

1948-1955 1968-1975

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

First partnership

FP marriage

FP cohabitation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

First partnership

FP marriage

FP cohabitation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

First partnership

FP marriage

FP cohabitation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

First partnership

FP marriage

FP cohabitation

Cumulative percentages of first partnership

MALES FEMALES

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

1948-55

1968-75

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

1948-55

1968-75

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

1948-55

1968-75

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

1948-55

1968-75

Cumulative percentages, who had by specified age entered a first partnership MALES

marriage cohabitation partnership

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1880

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1880

-198

4

20 25 30

Cumulative percentages, who had by specified age entered a first partnership FEMALES

marriage cohabitation partnership

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<19

29

1930

-193

4

1935

-193

9

1940

-194

4

1945

-194

9

1950

-195

4

1955

-195

9

1960

-196

4

1965

-196

9

1970

-197

4

1975

-197

9

1980

-198

4

20 25 30

First partnership: cohabitation or marriage, by age and residence, percentage

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Rura

l

S.t

ow

ns

B.t

ow

ns

Rura

l

S.t

ow

ns

B.t

ow

ns

Rura

l

S.t

ow

ns

B.t

ow

ns

Rura

l

S.t

ow

ns

B.t

ow

ns

Rura

l

S.t

ow

ns

B.t

ow

ns

Cohobitation

Marriage

1980-84 1975-79 1970-74 1965-69 1960-64

First partnership: cohabitation or marriage, by age and residence, percentage

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Ru

ral

S.to

wn

s

B.to

wn

s

Ru

ral

S.to

wn

s

B.to

wn

s

Ru

ral

S.to

wn

s

B.to

wn

s

Ru

ral

S.to

wn

s

B.to

wn

s

Cohobitation

Marriage

1960-64 1955-59 1950-54 1945-49

Cohabitants by age and sex in urban and rural areas, census 2001

urban women

urban men

rural women rural men

Population Census_Lithuania, 2001

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20–24 30–34 40–44 50–54 60–64

per

cen

t

R age 20-29 1 30-39 0.63*** 40-49 0.43*** 50-59 0.30*** 60-69 0.16*** 70+ 0.11***

R sex male 1 female 0.97 n.s.

R education higher 1 secondary 0.9 n.s. lower sec. 1.27***

R residence urban 1 rural 0.74*** R employment status employee 1 self-employed/employer 1.38*** unemployed 1.12 n.s.

*** p<0,001

Relative risk of ever entering the cohabitation

The highest risk to experience cohabitation:

for youngest age groups;

for the groups with the lowest education;

more for urban than rural population

Conclusions

Marital/partnership status:

With every younger generation: increase in cohabitation, decrease in marriage

There is the highest risk not to marry for rural/low educated/ unempoyed males

Conclusions

Partnership/marriage strategy:

Postponement of marriage:

from very young age to older age

Postponement of marriage is compensated by cohabitation in younger age:

spread of cohabitation/rejuvenation of cohabitation

cohabiting unions replace married unions

Rejuvenation/increase of partnerships – females

Rejuvenation/increase of partnerships - females

General partnership level remains near the same:

“daughters” start partnership earlier than “mothers”

Conclusions

Cohabitation:

The highest risk to experience cohabitation:

for youngest age groups;

for the groups with thelowest education;

more for urban than rural population