Upload
camilla-doyle
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Visual proprioceptive
control of standing in human infants
David N. Lee & Eric Aronson
By: Vannida Lorn
Background
Three important receptor systems:
1. Exteroception – stimuli outside
the body
2. Proprioception – position of the
body
3. Interception – stimuli inside the
body
Traditional View of StandingStanding requires constant
muscle adjustmentsIdeal position is verticalMovement away from vertical
causes lost of balanceStanding involves proprioception
because you use mechanoreceptors
However…Physical influence on standing,
but what about visual influence?Vision not only exteroceptive, but
also proprioceptive? Supporting Evidence:
◦Wood’s (1895) “haunted swing”◦Edward (1946) and Witkin &
Wapner’s (1950) blindfold experiment
ProcedureSwayed the room forward (which
should cause a backward sway in the infant)
Swayed the room backward (which should cause a forward sway in the infant)
ConflictVisual proprioception calls for
compensatory movement opposite of room movement
BUT mechanical proprioception should counteract the compensatory sway
…so if there is any abnormal loss of balance, this suggests that visual information dominated over mechanical information
Results82% of responses resulted in a
loss of balance◦26% sway◦23% stagger◦33% fall
Suggests Vision > Mechanics
Alternative Hypotheses
1. Avoidance response to a looming effect
◦However, this only applies when the room swayed towards the infant
2. Flow of air from the swaying of the room caused the loss of balance
◦Flow of air was so slight, unlikely to have been the cause of loss of balance
ConclusionFor infants: visual proprioception >
mechanical proprioception in maintaining posture
Visual system matures quicker than the motor system
During early life, visual proprioception is used to learn how to stand
As we get older, with practice does our mechanical proprioception performs as efficient as vision.