•Vision to Action Process•Current Trend Data•Vision Data•Strategies for Success•Questions

Vision-to-Action School Improvement Process

Steering Team / Community Council / Full Faculty / Student Body

6StrategySelection

7 Strategy PlanImplementation

Professional DevelopmentAnti-Resistance

Evaluation

8ACTION

© A

me

rican

Stu

de

nt A

chie

vem

ent In

stitute

5 Areas of ConcernExpectations Curriculum InstructionAssessment Extra Help Guidance

Environment

3Current

Data

4Data

Targets

1 VISION

2VisionData

THIRD GRADE TREND DATA

FOURTH GRADE TREND DATA

ALL STUDENTS – ENG/LA ALL STUDENTS - MATH

Encourage Rigorous Curriculum: Differentiated Instruction

Focused Academic Area: Focused Instructional Time (FIT)

Focused Student Group: Response to Instruction Groups

Parent Involvement Safe and Disciplined Learning

Environment

Response to Intervention

Tier 2

5-10%

Tier 1

80-90%

Services across tiers are fluid and data-driven.

NORTHWOOD-Daily Character Pledge, Classroom Management Procedures

NORTHWOOD –Core Curriculum, Scott Foresman, Everyday Math, Book Clubs 1-2, Lindamood -Bell weekly Kindergarten

Tier 31-5%

NORTHWOOD –K-4 Scott Foresman Strategic Intervention (push-in/out), Every day Math, Earobics K-2, Lindamood-Bell

NORTHWOOD-One on One with Administration, Sensory Room

NORTHWOOD-SF Sidewalks

NORTHWOOD-Sensory Room, Behavior Coach

156 Students currently receiving RTI37 students in math108 students in literacy11 students in behavior

The selection process occurs 3 times a year, but students transition in and out of RTI throughout the year depending on data and/or move-in situation.

28 students are currently receiving Tier 2 Intervention

85% of students who have been in Tier Interventions the entire year are showing growth

8 students are not achieving 80% or higher in their literacy/language grades in the classroom4 of the 8 students are new to

Northwood this year

The tier data above includes IEP students. From 2008-2010, we were proactive in tier 2 with language arts only.

Northwood Elementary Tier 2 and Tier 3 Data

2008/09      

Grade # in Grade# serviced in

tier 2# moved back

in tier 1 # moved from tier 2 to tier 3

K 94 25 6 61 91 24 2 102 86 26 2 03 74 17 3 14 102 14 4 4Total 447 106 17 21

2009/10      

Grade # in Grade# serviced in

tier 2# moved back

in tier 1 # moved from tier 2 to tier 3

K 90 33 5 31 93 30 7 92 97 26 6 33 97 25 7 44 85 19 5 2Total 462 133 30 21

2008/09

Grade

# in Grade

# serviced in tier 2

# moved back in tier 1

# moved from tier 2 to tier 3

K

94

25

6

6

1

91

24

2

10

2

86

26

2

0

3

74

17

3

1

4

102

14

4

4

Total

447

106

17

21

2009/10

Grade

# in Grade

# serviced in tier 2

# moved back in tier 1

# moved from tier 2 to tier 3

K

90

33

5

3

1

93

30

7

9

2

97

26

6

3

3

97

25

7

4

4

85

19

5

2

Total

462

133

30

21

Grade Tier 2 Interventio

n

Adequate Progress

Made

Continue in Tier 2

Tier 3 Interventio

n

K 4 2 2 0

1 6 3 2 1

2 1 0 1 0

3 1 1 0 0

4 3 1 0 2

Total 15 7 5 3