10
Vision, Illusion and Perception Volume 1 Series editor Nicholas Wade, University of Dundee, Department of Psychology, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK e-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board Benjamin W. Tatler, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK e-mail: [email protected] Frans Verstraten, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia e-mail: [email protected] Thomas Ditzinger, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected]

Vision, Illusion and Perception - Springer978-3-319-25229-2/1.pdf · Vision, Illusion and Perception Volume 1 Series editor Nicholas Wade, University of Dundee, Departmentof Psychology,

  • Upload
    lamnhan

  • View
    219

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Vision, Illusion and Perception

Volume 1

Series editor

Nicholas Wade, University of Dundee, Department of Psychology,Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland, UKe-mail: [email protected]

Editorial Board

Benjamin W. Tatler, University of Dundee, Dundee, UKe-mail: [email protected]

Frans Verstraten, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australiae-mail: [email protected]

Thomas Ditzinger, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germanye-mail: [email protected]

About this Series

The Vision, Illusion and Perception (VIP) book series publishes new developments and ad-vances in the fields of Vision and Perception research, rapidly and informally and with ahigh quality. The series publishes fundamental principles as well as state-of-the-art theories,methods and applications in the highly interdisciplinary field of Vision Science, Perceptionand multisensory processes related to vision. It covers all the technical contents, applications,and multidisciplinary aspects of fields such as Cognitive Science, Computational and Artifi-cial Intelligence, Machine Vision, Psychology, Physics, Eye Research, Ophthalmology, andNeuroscience. In addition, the series will embrace the growing interplay between the art andscience of vision. Within the scope of the series are monographs, popular science books, andselected contributions from specialized conferences and workshops.

More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/13864

Nicholas Wade

Art and Illusionists

ABC

Nicholas WadeDepartment of PsychologyUniversity of DundeeDundee DD1 4HNScotlandUKe-mail: [email protected]

ISSN 2365-7472 ISSN 2365-7480 (electronic)Vision, Illusion and PerceptionISBN 978-3-319-25227-8 ISBN 978-3-319-25229-2 (eBook)DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-25229-2

Library of Congress Control Number: Applied for

Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht Londonc© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part ofthe material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation,broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or informationstorage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodologynow known or hereafter developed.The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publicationdoes not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevantprotective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this bookare believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors orthe editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for anyerrors or omissions that may have been made.

Printed on acid-free paper

Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland is part of Springer Science+Business Media(www.springer.com)

To the growing family circle

Preface

Musing about the nature of art can be amusing as well as instructive. It can also be illusory. The musings usually take place in the province of art history and one emi-nent art historian, Ernst Gombrich, wrote a seminal survey under the title Art and Illusion. His proposal was that art could best be considered from the viewpoint of psychology. Indeed, the subtitle of his book is A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Gombrich was a professional art historian and an amateur psychol-ogist. In contrast, Art and Illusionists is a survey of pictorial art by a visual psycholo-gist who is an amateur artist. Rather than art looking at science this is science look-ing at art. Also unlike Gombrich’s book, attention is devoted to the artists as well as their art so that the illusionists are featured in addition to their illusions. I agree with his statement that “When we deal with masters of the past who were great artists and great ‘illusionists’, the study of art and the study of illusions cannot always be kept apart”. The same sentiment applies to the present, too. Gombrich was arguing that perception has not changed over human history but styles of art have and he main-tained that this ‘riddle of style’ should be addressed by psychology. That is, human perception of the three-dimensional world has not changed over time but the ways two-dimensional pictures are produced and perceived has.

Art is a strange endeavour which is engaged in by our species alone. It refl ects our evolutionary success in allocating time to activities that are not directly devoted to sustenance and survival. The production and perception of art refl ects the im-portance of nurturing our intellects for sustaining our survival. From the dawning of depiction the illusory nature of representation was not only appreciated but also altered and amplifi ed. A picture of a charging bull presents less imminent danger than a charging bull and the appearance of depth in a painting does not entice us to enter it. This delight in pictorial deceit continues to this day and it is celebrat-ed in Art and Illusionists. With the emergence of abstract art, illusions assumed a more central role in pictures, both of the painted and printed varieties. In modern art there is less concern with producing images that refer to objects; the fl at picture plane suffi ces to provide a platform for pictorial performances in both art and sci-ence. Painters plumb the art of observation whereas scientists peer into the pro-cesses of perception. Both produce patterns that perplex our perceptions and pres-ent us with puzzles to peruse and images from art and science can be found in the chapters that follow.

viii Preface

Dr Johnson’s jaundiced view of writing was that “No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money”. The fashion for books presenting paradoxes of perception has grown in recent years and many excellent examples are available. According to Dr Johnson this suggests that either there is money to be made in this genre or there are a lot of blockheads! On the other hand, the fascination with pictorial perception provides its own rewards. Moreover, an increasing number of websites presenting a plethora of visual puzzles is available. Whether another addition to this armoury is required remains to be seen. My hope is that Art and Illusionists presents a littlemore context to the illustrations presented, both in terms of their history and of their originators. The latter is provided by the vehicle of what I call ‘perceptual por-traits’; these represent people in an unconventional way by combining their appear-ance with some allusion to the work they carry out. It is not always easy to see the faces in the perceptual portraits but they can be discerned with persistence. When we wish to extract detail from a picture we usually examine it carefully and closely; the opposite is often the case with perceptual portraits where the low contrast facial features become visible when the sharp details are more poorly resolved. Thus, il-lusions are presented in the art and the portraits of the illusionists themselves pose perceptual puzzles.

Illusions and art have long been a fascination for me. Indeed, my fi rst book was entitled The Art and Science of Visual Illusions. It was principally concerned with sur-veying the genre called op art with the eye of a visual scientist. In the process of pre-paring the book I taught myself how to produce op art designs. In fact, the book was drawn before the words were added. Essentially the same strategy has been employed for Art and Illusionists except that the works of others are presented too and the pur-view is broader. Where no credits for a picture are given then it is an image of my making. A variety of techniques has been employed in produced them; some involve graphics alone, others are relatively straightforward photographs and yet others com-bine graphical and photographic images, usually portraits.

The survey of artistic illusions commences with cave painting and concludes with computer generated stereoscopic art works. Between these poles the topics extend from mosaics to moiré patterns, from da Vinci to Vasarely, and they are arranged in terms of the common features the pictures possess or the general phenomena that they exploit. The distinctions between the chapter titles are somewhat arbitrary and some of the illustrations could have found a home in several of them. Illusions of sci-ence are included, too; that is, the geometrical optical illusions that are dissected in laboratories in order to determine the processes involved in generating them. The artistic and scientifi c explorations of illusions are intentionally intertwined so that the arbitrary distinctions between them dissolve. There are some features of Art and Illusionists that are not shared by other sources of illusions. One is the inclusion of a transparent overlay, so that readers can use it for generating dynamic moiré patterns (Chapter 15). Moreover, the overlay can be used with patterns that display depth from moiré disparities. Stereoscopic depth is dependent upon slight differences in the im-ages presented to each eye. Such presentation can be achieved in several ways, and the anaglyph method (with coloured fi lters and similarly coloured printing) is the tech-nique employed for the images in the fi nal chapter. Thus, Art and Illusionists is in-tended to blend the art and science of vision in novel ways.

ixPreface

The book itself has changed in the process of preparation. The initial aim was to fi nd and reproduce examples of startling illusions and to provide some account of how they produce such striking visual impact. It was immediately evident that the usual boundaries that are erected to separate art from science were themselves illuso-ry and required dismantling. The common concern is with the surprises that can be delivered by vision when looking at relatively simple marks on a surface. My interests moved to the makers of the illusions and to accord them more prominence than they are normally accorded – hence the perceptual portraits. The latter seemed to take on lives of their own, in large part because of the graphical puzzles they posed in combin-ing visages and visions.

I would like to thank the generosity of all the artists and scientists who have giv-en permission for their works to be used; they are listed in the Image Credits. The works of some signifi cant artists, like Magritte, Dalí, Duchamp, Escher and Vasarely, are so well known that illustrative representations of their works was deemed unnec-essary; all have excellent books illustrating their works as well as dedicated websites and these are listed in the Bibliography and an appendix, respectively, so that readers can consult them. Citations to relevant books by artists are given in the text and some additional references can be found in the Bibliography. Some contemporary artists proved diffi cult to locate and it was not possible to seek permission to use their work; in these cases, books containing examples of their art and their websites are again list-ed. For both categories, the artists make appearances in perceptual portraits.

It is impossible to thank all those who have helped in preparing and producing Art and Illusionists but I would like to acknowledge the enthusiastic encouragement pro-vided by Springer, and by Tom Ditzinger in particular; in addition, Armin Stasch has applied his sensitivity and skills in the layout of the text and images so that the reader can navigate through the labyrinth of illusions displayed. It is, however, to my grow-ing family circle that the book is dedicated; they have provided unseen support in a myriad of ways and some of them make further appearances in the pages that follow.

Nicholas WadeNewport-on-Tay, summer 2015

1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 Perspective Paradoxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Anamorphoses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

3 Trompe l’Œil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

4 Mosaic and Tiling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Mosaics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Tiling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81

5 Impossible Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

6 Surrealism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

7 Geometrical Optical Illusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 Orientation Illusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 Size Illusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 Size and Orientation Illusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 Subjective Contours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143

8 Ambiguity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147

9 Hidden Images . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161

10 Word and Image . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183

11 Colour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207

12 Contrast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227

13 Faces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 Selfi es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271

Contents

xii Contents

14 Scintillation and Apparent Motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277 Motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302

15 Moiré and Motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311 Moving Moirés . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319 Moiré Stereo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333

16 Stereoscopic Vision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335 Stereophotography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339 Binocular Rivalry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 Wallpaper Illusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342 Autostereograms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345

Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355

Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363 Image Credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363 Websites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367

Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369 Name Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369 Subject Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372