Virginians and Their Histories...2 virginians and their histories largely political and military. It underestimated the importance of events in the historical experience that did not

Virginians and Their Histories

University of Virginia PressCharlottesville and London

in collaboration with the Library of Virginia

University of Virginia Pressin collaboration with the Library of Virginia

© 2020 Brent TarterAll rights reserved

Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper

First published 2020

1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2

Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication DataNames: Tarter, Brent, 1948– author.

Title: Virginians and their histories / Brent Tarter.Description: Charlottesville : University of Virginia Press, 2020. | Includes

bibliographical references and index.Identifiers: lccn 2019050025 (print) | lccn 2019050026 (ebook) | isbn

9780813943923 (cloth) | isbn 9780813943930 (ebook)Subjects: lcsh: Virginia—History.

Classification: lcc f226 .t37 2020 (print) | lcc f226 (ebook) | ddc 975.5—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019050025

LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019050026

Cover art: Images from the collections of the Library of Virginia

Contents

Acknowledgments vii

1 The View from Cumberland Gap 1

2 The English Invasion of Tsenacomoco 17

3 Royal Colony 39

4 Life in the Seventeenth Century 58

5 Tobacco and Slavery 69

6 Life in the Eighteenth Century 84

7 Mid- Century Challenges 109

8 Independence and Revolution 128

9 Virginians and the New Nation 155

10 Life in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century 171

11 Slave State 195

12 Divided State in a Divided Nation 215

13 Civil War and Emancipation 239

14 Constructing a New Virginia 267

15 Three Lost Causes 293

16 Jim Crow Virginia 315

17 Progressive Virginians 333

18 Two World Wars and the Great Depression 357

19 Civil Rights 381

20 Suburban State 400

21 Cosmopolitan State 421

vi Contents

Notes 443

Further Reading 453

Illustration Credits 475

Index 477

Acknowledgments

This history of Virginia, published by the University of Virginia Press in collaboration with the Library of Virginia, began as a collab-orative project of historians and editors at the Library of Virginia with me as coordinator. We planned to draw on our collective knowledge derived from our research in the primary sources of every decade of Virginia’s English- language history and employ the insights of the best new scholarship to review and reinterpret the history of the people who have lived in the colony and state. Through a series of budget and staff reductions and reassignments of responsibilities the work eventually fell on me. Current and former Library of Virginia staff members who participated in the planning discussions, con-tributed information or memoranda on topics about which they had special knowledge, or read and commented on parts or all of one or more drafts are William Bland Whitley, Patricia D. Watkinson, Annie Gunter Tripp, San-dra G. Treadway, Emily J. Salmon, Gordon W. Poindexter, Jennifer Davis Mc-Daid, Jennifer R. Loux, Bill Leubke, Maria E. Kimberly, Gregg D. Kimball, Marianne E. Julienne, Emma Ito, Ann E. Henderson, Katharine E. Harbury, Donald W. Gunter, Catherine Fitzgerald Wyatt, John G. Deal, Edward D. C. Campbell Jr., Sara B. Bearss, and Barbara C. Batson, who also worked closely with me to select and procure the maps and illustrations. Professors John T. Kneebone, of Virginia Commonwealth University, and Kevin R. Hardwick, of James Madison University, read the entire text for the press and made in-sightful and well- informed suggestions. Christine Sisic, of the Library of Virginia, designed the jacket. My excellent friend and colleague the late Sara Bearss suggested the title.

Virginians and Their Histories

1

THE VIEW FROM CUMBERLAND GAP

Frederick Jackson Turner made an influential address to mem-bers of the American Historical Association in 1892. He invited them to imagine themselves standing at Cumberland Gap at the western tip of Virginia and watching American history march by. Turner said that they would first see deer and other wild animals wandering trails, then Indians pur-suing their hunts through the woods, and after them the first European explor-ers and prospectors, then land speculators and settlers, and finally farmers and planters and entrepreneurs. Turner explained that as those people moved west through the eastern woodlands and across the Great Plains and the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific coast they created successive waves of frontier experi-ences that shaped the essence of American democratic culture.

The history of what became the United States and of what is now Vir-ginia is not that simple, and it did not begin at Cumberland Gap or even at Jamestown in 1607 or at Plymouth Rock in 1620, where many of Turner’s contemporary historians looked for the origins and meaning of American history. The narrative of rising democratic institutions and practices against a background of regional differences that shaped Turner’s historical writing relegated American Indians to peripheral roles as victims of or obstacles to the triumphal progress of democratic civilization. It neglected women except as occasional agents of moral reform. It also marginalized the experiences and contributions to the nation’s culture and economy of Africans and their de-scendants, some of whom first entered what became the United States even before the first immigrants landed at Plymouth Rock.

That master narrative was popular in the nineteenth and twentieth cen-turies and provided readers of American history and of Virginia’s history a story of progress and achievement that was largely white and male. It was also

2 virginians and their histories

largely political and military. It underestimated the importance of events in the historical experience that did not easily fit into themes of progress and democratic development. Progress and change— which were not always the same— came with pains and with losses, and at times the democratic narrative retreated rather than advanced.

Turner asked his audience to stand at Cumberland Gap and look west as American civilization and institutions moved from the Atlantic coast to the Pacific coast. If members of his audience had imagined themselves looking east from Cumberland Gap the view would have been different. They would have seen a relentless movement of people from another world who overspread the land where people had resided for countless generations. Newly arrived people pushed aside or killed people who were already there and largely replaced their culture and institutions with a radically different way of life for a radically different civilization. Seeing the events of the early years of the seventeenth century, what some scholars call the contact period, from the west allows you to see things differently than if viewing them from Jamestown or London. It is the same with all aspects of Virginia’s history. Viewing them from different perspectives and in the light of insights not available to earlier writers requires us to interpret most parts of Virginia’s colonial and commonwealth history differently from the way we used to understand them.

Writing the History of VirginiansThe 1970s began what might be described as the golden age of historical scholarship on Virginia. Scores of original books and hundreds of articles in scholarly journals have explored aspects of the colony’s and state’s history that earlier writers had misunderstood, ignored, or dismissed as unimportant. Archaeologists, anthropologists, historians, economists, demographers, eth-nographers, archivists, librarians, teachers, and smart people without formal academic credentials in any of those disciplines but with unsatisfied curiosities have enriched our understandings of many aspects of the history of Virginia and its peoples. Drawing on that scholarship permits us to reevaluate many events in Virginia history in the light of those new understandings and also to fill in some old and yawning gaps. That literature also requires us to recon-sider what we thought we once knew about race relations, religious culture, economic changes, gender relations, and the lives of women and children that differed from the lives of the political and military leaders pre- 1970s histori-cal literature tended to emphasize. We can now understand more about Vir-ginia’s history and all of its peoples and construct a new narrative of how those people lived in the place now called Virginia.

The View from Cumberland Gap 3

Regional variety and cultural diversity are important themes in Virgin-ia’s history, as are interactions and conflicts— sometimes violent, sometimes not— between people of differing cultures. One of the most important of the many themes that appear and reappear through the centuries of Virginia’s his-tory is the relations between different races. From the early years of the seven-teenth century Indians and descendants of Africans and Europeans have lived together and apart and interacted with one another in ways that fundamen-tally shaped how they all lived. Later immigrations from Scotland and Ireland, from Germany, from elsewhere in Europe, and still later from elsewhere in the United States, the Americas, and Asia changed the lives of the people who already lived in Virginia. Living in Virginia changed the lives of immigrants, too, although not always in the same way. It is necessary when contemplating any one of those encounters or populations to regard each in the contexts of what they shared and also of what they did not share with the others. Hence the title of this book, Virginians and Their Histories.

Virginia’s history is all of their stories. To write about Virginians as a ho-mogenous group, as some historians formerly did, excludes large portions of the population from consideration. Different groups of Virginians experi-enced their shared history in different ways. To state that Virginians believed something or experienced an event in a certain way is almost certainly to gen-eralize inaccurately from one group to the whole. It is extremely difficult and almost always misleading to refer to Virginians as an undifferentiated popu-lation without regard to race, gender, or differences in wealth, social status, and geographic location.

English and later British imperial policies and commercial concerns shaped the context in which all the people in the colony of Virginia lived and regulated their political and economic lives. Some of those policies promoted and some inhibited the pace of European settlement. In many subtle ways the various peoples who lived in the colony produced a distinctive Virginia variant on English culture and government that in turn profoundly influenced how Indian, European, and African residents of Virginia and their descendants lived. Those dynamics changed when Virginia joined with the other colonies at the time of the American Revolution and after that with ratification of Con-stitution of the United States. The momentous events of the American Civil War upended virtually everything about how all Virginians lived. During the civil rights and women’s movements of the twentieth century actions of Con-gress and federal courts forced important changes in Virginians’ ways of life. National political events and national and international economic changes also influenced how Virginians lived. Few or none of the changes were within the power of any or all the people in Virginia to control or prevent.


The First PeopleFrederick Jackson Turner asked members of his audience to imagine them-selves at a specific place, at Cumberland Gap, and also imagine themselves at a specific time. Cumberland Gap became important in the 1770s when explor-ers and families from mid- Atlantic colonies first began crossing the moun-tains at that place to enter Kentucky. By then, though, many generations of people to the east had created complex cultural relationships on the landscape between the mountains and the sea. If we image ourselves at Cumberland Gap and looking east across the landscape of Virginia and much further back in time we can begin to understand Virginia’s long history afresh and look at all of it anew.

An imaginary observer standing at Cumberland Gap twenty thousand years ago and able to see around the curvature of the Earth could have watched the beginnings of an important human drama. Forested mountains and val-leys stretched away from Cumberland Gap in every direction. To the south were the Great Smoky Mountains. To the west and northwest was the land later called Kentucky. Its mountains and deep valleys relaxed into rolling hills near the Ohio River, a broad avenue of transportation Indians used long before white explorers from England and France first viewed it in the seventeenth century. That land was western Virginia until 1792. To the north of Cum-berland Gap was the land that in 1863 split off from Virginia and became West Virginia. It was also a large expanse of rugged mountains and valleys that stretched far north toward the headwaters of the Ohio River.

To the east and northeast of Cumberland Gap the imaginary viewer would see the landscape of what became the state of Virginia. It reached more than 400 miles east across high mountains and narrow valleys, across lower and gentler hills, across broad rivers and narrow streams, through forests and swamps, all the way to the Atlantic Ocean. Mountains stretched away north-east from Cumberland Gap in parallel rows with narrow valleys between them. Between the easternmost mountain ranges, the Allegheny and the Blue Ridge, was a broader valley later known as the Great Valley or the Valley of Virginia, a region so distinctive that Virginians gave its name capital letters. In the north of it the Shenandoah River and the South Branch of the Potomac River flowed northeastward. In the southwestern portion the upper tributar-ies of the Clinch and Holston Rivers flowed south and southwest into the Tennessee River Valley. The New River cut across the southwest- to- northeast ranges of mountains and valleys as it flowed north out of North Carolina and turned west and crossed the Valley of Virginia to become the Great Kanawha River along its way to the Ohio.

The imaginary observer might see some of the first human figures moving


through the valleys of the mountains or might see distant smoke from the campfires of nomadic hunters and gatherers who stopped to sleep, hunt, or fish on the banks of eastern rivers or Chesapeake Bay. When and where those first people entered what is now Virginia is not known. Archaeological inves-tigations at the Cactus Hill site in Sussex County in southeastern Virginia revealed that people were in Virginia between 20,000 and 15,000 bc.

Early human residents had many sources of animal and plant food available to them. Hunting, fishing, and foraging people moved and settled in families and dwelled at temporary campsites near streams at many locations within the present boundaries of Virginia. In the east they feasted on the rich supply of fish and shellfish from the waters near the bay. Moose, elk, deer, and bear were then common in much of the region. Fossil remains of mastodon and mam-moth have been found in the valley of the North Fork of the Holston River near the modern town of Saltville in southwestern Virginia, and remains of a mastodon have been found near Yorktown in southeastern Virginia. By about 9500 bc people had established base camps in several places. Archaeologists have identified early camp or settlement sites at Flint Run, or Thunderbird, in Warren County in the northern part of Virginia, and at what is known as the Williamson Site in Dinwiddie County in the east- central part of Virginia. Indians quarried jasper (a quartz) at Flint Run and chert in Dinwiddie for

Joshua Fry and Peter Jefferson, A Map of the Most Inhabited Part of Virginia (4th state, London 1755), clearly shows the mountains and valleys northeast of Cumber-land Gap, which is west of the edge of the map.


making tools and weapons. By 5,000 bc they were making axes using quartzite and basalt.

Late in the first millennium ad the people adopted the bow and arrow to replace the atlatl, or spear thrower, as their primary hunting weapon. When hunting deer and other large animals they surrounded an area and advanced toward the center to concentrate the animals. They sometimes set fire to the woods to force the game toward a place where the animals could more easily be killed. Early residents of what became Virginia also created elaborate pottery and ornaments of bone and shell that had artistic as well as utilitarian value. Surviving pieces of pottery and other goods indicate that considerable cultural variety existed in different places and at different times. People also engaged in long- distance trading along forest paths and rivers and developed trade routes that extended up and down the Atlantic coast and far inland to the northwest and southwest. Tribes in the Appalachian Mountains supplied sheet mica to the Hopewell Burial Mound people of the Ohio River Valley, and Indians in eastern Virginia acquired copper from people in the Great Lakes region.

It is not certain when people in the various regions of what became Vir-ginia first adopted agriculture. About 2,500 bc they obtained squash and gourds from tribes to the southwest, and they later acquired corn and by about ad 1000 beans, as well. In order to raise crops in the forest Indians cut deep

Artifacts from Werowocomoco


rings around tree trunks to sever the sapwood that carried water from the roots to the branches. The trees died, which allowed sunlight to reach the forest floor where the Indians planted their seeds and tended their crops. They also burned the underbrush to clear the land. Ash from the fires fertilized the soil. Land in such clearings could be cultivated for several years, after which people killed trees elsewhere and moved their fields. New forests then reclaimed aban-doned fields. It was an efficient method of farming that modified the natural environment in ways different from how European methods of agriculture later altered the landscape.

People lived differently depending on where they lived and when they lived there. The geological regions within Virginia have always influenced how people have lived in its different parts. In the westernmost portion of what became Virginia is the high Appalachian Plateau, part of the Appala-chian Mountain chain that extends southwest from the Gaspé Peninsula in Quebec to Alabama. Much of southern and eastern West Virginia as well as eastern Kentucky are part of the plateau. Within the present boundaries of Virginia the plateau includes Buchanan and Dickenson Counties, most of Wise County, the western portions of Russell, Scott, and Tazewell Counties, and the northwestern portion of Lee County.

The Allegheny Mountains along most of the current Virginia– West Vir-ginia border are part of the Appalachian system. The Allegheny Mountains are a high and rugged mountain region with narrow and steep stream- eroded valleys that surmount horizontal or gently tilted sandstone and shale forma-tions and coal beds. The coal underneath the mountains became the state’s most important mineral resource late in the nineteenth century. During the early centuries of human habitation the mountains were probably the least densely populated region. The steep mountains and narrow valleys covered with mixed hardwood and conifer forests may have enticed hunter- gatherer people, but relatively few places appeared suitable for agriculture or long- term settlement. Cumberland Gap offered a relatively easy east– west crossing place.

In the valleys east of the Appalachian Mountains solution- weathering of limestone and dolomite formations in the area is responsible for the region’s fertile soil and karst landscape of sinkholes, springs, and caves. Human habita-tion can be traced back to very early dates. The valleys provided natural routes for trade, migration, and invasion throughout human history, even though Indians may have used the region more as a pathway and as a shared seasonal hunting ground than as a place of long- term residence. For the early Indians as well as for the English- and German- speaking colonists of the eighteenth century the valleys of Virginia offered many advantages. The fertile soil sup-ported populations of game that served as a source of food, and where the land was not too steep it was ideal for agriculture. Most of the landscape features of


the region now have English names, but numerous places in the Shenandoah Valley and the Blue Ridge have German names. The loss of most of the Indian names graphically reflects the changes in the populations of human beings there since the seventeenth century.

Archaeological evidence of the existence of several large town sites in the southwestern valleys indicates that the people who lived there during the second millennium ad were numerous and were successful as farmers and hunters. They were culturally affiliated with the Mound Builders of the Ohio and Mississippi River Valleys. Remnants of their ceremonial mounds exist in several parts of southwestern Virginia, some of which were the objects of excavation or desecration during the nineteenth century. Ely Mound in Lee County was a very large oval about three hundred feet in circumference. A Mississippian town founded about ad 1500 and now known as the Crab Orchard Site in Tazewell County was excavated in the 1940s and again in the 1970s. The town was about four hundred feet across. Its residents constructed a palisade that surrounded and protected the town. They may have replaced it as many as three times during their long occupation of the site. The town was home to about four hundred people and had a large council house about sixty- five feet long and from thirty to forty feet wide. Archaeologists have studied another large palisaded town at Saltville. The existence of those large settlements indicates that the people who dwelled in the area and created the towns had developed complex and effective economic, cultural, and political systems. They could devote time and labor to creating and maintaining large- scale settlements and feeding the residents, indicating they no longer needed to devote all their energies entirely to subsistence hunting, fishing, or farming. The number of people who resided in the southern valleys at any given time is not known.

In the northern valleys and in the Potomac River watershed small popula-tions gradually adopted agriculture and became more numerous during the first millennium ad as the climate warmed and permitted the cultivation of grain and other crops. When groups of people established annual settlements for agriculture they sometimes came into conflict with other groups who had traditionally used the region for seasonal hunting and fishing or for gathering nuts, berries, and other edible wild plants. In the lower portion of the Potomac River Valley a cooling of the climate known as the Little Ice Age, from the thirteenth through the sixteenth centuries, produced some significant shifts in settlement patterns. People moved to lower altitudes or lower latitudes where the game, fish, trees, and useful vegetation allowed them to continue their lifestyles with minimal disruption or adaptation to new conditions. Other Indians who had lived in what are now Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New York also shifted their hunting territories as their game moved southward or


downward from higher elevations. Those population movements created new occasions for conflicts.

The eastern flank of the valleys is the Blue Ridge Mountain chain, a long, narrow range of steep mountains that extends from southern Pennsylvania to northern Georgia. It varies in width from about two miles at the Potomac River to more than fifty miles at the Virginia– North Carolina border. East of the Blue Ridge is the large Piedmont area of Virginia. Its name is derived from the Piedmont region of Italy and means foot of the mountains or foothills. In the south along the North Carolina border the Piedmont is more than two hundred miles wide; in the north it is much narrower. Near the Blue Ridge are isolated mountains and ridges with elevations as high as two thousand feet. The low relief of the Piedmont slopes gently eastward, but the rocks that make up and underlie it extend farther eastward deep beneath the adjoining Coastal Plain and the continental shelf. By the sixteenth century ad, a variety of people with different languages and cultural traditions resided in the Pied-mont. The best known are the Siouan- speaking Tutelo, Saponi, Occaneechi, Monacan, and Manahoac. Some of them erected ceremonial mounds as resi-dents of the western mountains and the Great Plains did. Thomas Jefferson made a study of one such mound in Albemarle County in the 1780s.

The eastern boundary of the Piedmont is the fall line where rivers pass over the margin of the Piedmont’s hard, erosion- resistant rocks onto the Coastal Plain. The fall line exhibits some dramatic scenes like the Potomac River’s Great Falls. At other sites, such as where the Rappahannock River crosses the fall line at Fredericksburg or where the James River crosses the fall line at Rich-mond, the rivers contain stretches of shallow, turbulent water that are not navigable. The roughly hundred- mile- wide Coastal Plain between the fall line and Chesapeake Bay is the least rugged region of Virginia. The topography is generally a low- relief terraced landscape with elevations ranging from two hundred feet inland to sea level along the Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic shore-lines. The lower reaches of all of the rivers in the Coastal Plain are subject to tidal fluctuations, and the water there is mildly brackish. That region is often referred to as the Tidewater because the rivers and streams rise and fall twice daily as water piles up against the flowing tides in the bay.

Several broad rivers— two with native names, the Potomac and the Rap-pahannock, and two now with English names, the York and the James— flow east or southeast and empty into Chesapeake Bay and create fertile lowlands and bountiful wetlands. The strip of land between the Potomac and Rappa-hannock Rivers is traditionally referred to as the Northern Neck, and the strip between the Rappahannock and York Rivers as the Middle Peninsula. The land between the York and James Rivers has long been called merely the Peninsula. The region south of the James and Appomattox Rivers, east of the


Piedmont, and west of the coastal lowlands is often called the Southside. Each is a distinctive region to which Virginians have given capital letters.

A narrow peninsula borders the eastern portion of the bay. The Eastern Shore, as it is called, is almost surrounded by saltwater; the ocean is on its east and the less salty bay on the west. The narrow Eastern Shore is the southern part of the Delmarva Peninsula, which is wider north of the present Virginia- Maryland border. The Eastern Shore may have formed after the last Ice Age as dispersed coastal sediment coalesced around offshore shoals and barrier islands. Wave action and alongshore drift still transport sand along Virginia’s coastline, building and reshaping the barrier islands. There are currently eigh-teen of them along the Eastern Shore and the barrier spit that extends south-ward from Virginia Beach into North Carolina.

With the melting of the last continental glacial ice the lower valleys of the Susquehanna River and its tributary rivers were drowned, which created the Chesapeake Bay and the wide lower regions of the Potomac, Rappahannock, York, and James Rivers. Although called a bay, the Chesapeake is by definition an estuary, a region where fresh river water interacts with salt ocean water. It is the largest estuary in the United States. It was— and is— an easy place to make a living. The land could easily sustain the low- intensity agriculture the Indians practiced. The rivers teemed with freshwater fish, including seasonal migrations of great swarms of herring and other anadromous fish that live at sea but return to fresh waters to breed, as well as large and succulent stur-geon. The bay had its own populations of fish that were adapted to its brackish waters, and millions of crabs and oysters seemed just waiting to be harvested. And during the winter when agriculture was impossible and crops harvested in the autumn grew scarce, an astonishing abundance of wintering waterfowl descended on the region from northern breeding sites. Early European visitors marveled at the large flocks of more than a dozen species of ducks, two species of geese, and two species of wild swans, all of which provided nourishment for residents of the bay area.

The many tidal inlets with habitable sites on the shore of the bay prob-ably enticed some of the first human beings who visited the area to stay and make their homes. It is likely that the Coastal Plain has always been the most populous portion of Virginia. The abundant fish and shellfish of the rivers and bay, the turkeys, deer, bear, and other animals, and the fruits, nuts, vines, and other plants of the forests supported dozens of populations of people by the second millennium ad. They lived in semi- permanent towns and engaged in agriculture, fishing, and hunting, and in the wetlands near the bay gathered the starchy tuckahoe. The earliest English explorers of the Chesapeake Bay and lower Potomac River recorded the names of many of the groups or tribes who lived there and assigned their names to creeks, bays, peninsulas, or larger


regions that preserve evidence of Indian places of residence. The names of groups of people thereby became place names.

A long gradual warming trend reversed the effects of the Little Ice Age by the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Agriculture gained a firmer foothold in the lives of most or all the inhabitants of the Coastal Plain. The residents adopted seasonal lifestyles of hunting, fishing, planting, and harvesting and except during hunting and fishing seasons remained closer to the centers of their places of habitation. Protecting their separate worlds from outside en-croachments became more important than during earlier and colder times when people had lived in smaller groups and moved more often. Agricultural settlement required people to organize themselves politically in order to wage occasional defensive or offensive warfare. They also had to develop diplomatic techniques and devise methods of negotiation with neighboring groups in order to avoid or to terminate conflicts. Large settlements also required co-ordination of economic activities and promoted the development of larger and more complex political leadership networks. In the lower Potomac River valley by the sixteenth century ad, some of the towns had formed leagues under the leadership of a paramount chief, or ruler, a process that almost cer-tainly took place elsewhere in the region about that time.

John White, Americae pars, Nunc Virginia dicta, 1590. As in most early Virginia maps, north is to the right, not the top.


The Powhatan of TsenacomocoThe most numerous group of people in the region at that time was an Algonquian- speaking people who were culturally similar to other Eastern Woodland Indians. Known as the Powhatan, they resided in towns of the Coastal Plain and farmed the lowlands from the James River north to the Po-tomac. They raised tobacco, sunflowers, squash, beans, and maize (which the English called Indian corn), and they gathered the abundant food resources of the tidewater region. In addition to their agriculture their seasonal hunt-ing, their fishing and foraging enabled them to support a complex and fairly stable society.

Powhatan society was a modified matrilineal one. Authority to rule de-scended through female lines. When a male ruler or chief died the next se-nior male descendant of his mother usually succeeded him, but some towns had women rulers. Through an initiation rite known as the huskanaw young men entered adulthood and assumed their roles as hunters or lead-ers. A wero wance (whom the earliest English writers called chief or king) who could be either male or female (werowansqua) governed each town or tribe. Wero wances may have been able to support multiple wives. They and priests may have been the only members of the society who were believed to enjoy an afterlife, but early English accounts of the religious beliefs of the sixteenth- and early seventeenth- century Indians in eastern Virginia are to some extent contradictory and unreliable and may have misinterpreted the substance and significance of Indians’ beliefs and practices.

In the 1570s or 1580s, the chief Wahunsonacock consolidated about thirty Algonquian groups (among them the Rappahannock, Pamunkey, Matta- poni, and Appamattuck) to form an extended confederacy or chiefdom known as Tsenacomoco (pronounced Tsen- ah- kah- mah´- kah). The name has been translated as meaning densely inhabited land. Thirteen thousand or more people lived in an area that encompassed about six thousand square miles, mostly north of the James River and near the bay and the mouths of the other great rivers. As the paramount chief of the alliance Wahunsonacock was the mamanatowick, a revered spiritual and civil leader. He was also known as Powhatan.

At the beginning of the seventeenth century Wahunsonacock resided in the large town of Werowocomoco near a shallow bay on the north bank of the York River in what is now Gloucester County. Archaeological excavations at Werowocomoco revealed that it was the largest of the towns in the Chesa-peake region and included the paramount chief ’s ceremonial house. Two long parallel trenches bisected the town. Their significance is unclear, but they may have featured in early religious ceremonies. The Powhatan made very effec-


tive use of the natural resources of the area and were able to devote time and energy to other pursuits beyond subsistence farming, hunting, and fishing. Constructing a town on such a scale and providing sufficient food for its in-habitants required many people and much labor as well as skillful manage-ment of those resources. It is likely that Indians from throughout Tsenaco-moco were as impressed by Werowocomoco and its leader as English visitors were beginning in 1607.

Engraved reproductions of paintings that John White made of residents of the Outer Banks of North Carolina in the 1580s may give a good idea of how some towns in Tsenacomoco appeared and how their residents lived. Early Englishmen such as Captain John Smith, William Strachey, and Alexander Whitaker wrote about the people of Tsenacomoco, their towns, and their

Powhatan in State, from John Smith, The Generall Historie of Virginia, New England, and the Summer Isles (London, 1624)


cultural practices. Their accounts of the people and descriptions of the land-scape contain variant spellings as a result of the writers’ attempts to render into English the words they heard from the Indians. Their accounts sometimes disclose as much about English perspectives as about Powhatan lives. For ex-ample, Indian women worked the fields, harvested fruits and vegetables, and gathered tuckahoe from marshes, which contrasted with English agricultural practices that assigned such work to lower- class men. Indian men hunted and fished, which Englishmen of the time regarded as recreational activities re-served for men of privileged classes or as disreputable activities of poachers. Distribution of labor within Powhatan society appeared to English observers to be strange and uncivilized.

The earliest English observers and writers had all grown to maturity as sub-jects of Queen Elizabeth I and were comfortable with the idea that women of high status could rule their towns as werowansquas; but their general observa-tions reinforced English perceptions of the Indians as uncivilized by English or European definitions. Englishmen probably misunderstood the decentralized nature of Powhatan political authority as can be seen by their application of hi-erarchical European terms such as king, queen, and emperor that inaccurately represented the realities of the cultural and political relationships among the people who lived in Tsenacomoco. Each town maintained a large measure of

Archaeological investigation of Werowocomoco


independence. The paramount chief and local werowances reaffirmed their relationships through ritual exchanges, marriage alliances, and other cultural practices rather than primarily through coercion, as some early English writers appeared to believe. And not all tribes near the bay were part of the paramount chiefdom. The Chickahominy lived under the rule of religious leaders rather than political or military officers and maintained a large measure of indepen-dence from the Powhatan.

From Cumberland Gap the imaginary witness to history would have seen at the beginning of the seventeenth century that the Powhatan of Tsenaco-moco were the most numerous and politically powerful people within view.

The First EuropeansFrom Cumberland Gap the imaginary observer could also have seen in the nearby valleys the first encounters between native residents of North America

Village of Secotan, from Theodore de Bry, Admiranda narratio (Frankfurt, 1590)


and people from Europe. Two members of Hernando de Soto’s Spanish ex-ploring party are believed to have entered what is now Lee County in south-western Virginia in 1540. In 1567 another group of Spanish explorers attacked a Holstonia town at the site of the modern town of Saltville. Spain had long been interested in Bahía de Santa María and Ajacan, the Spanish names for Chesapeake Bay and Virginia. In 1570 they established a Jesuit mission on the south bank of the river later known as the York, but the Indians destroyed the mission in 1571. A year later Spanish troops from Florida retaliated and killed many Indians.

It is unlikely that people who lived near the ocean knew about the Spanish presence in the west or that people in the west were aware of Spanish visits to the bay. Some people in the east, however, had an opportunity to learn some-thing about Spain. About 1560 a Spanish exploring party entered the bay and took a young man named Paquiquineo back to Spain, presented him to the king, baptized him, and gave him the name Don Luís de Velasco. After he had visited several Spanish colonies in the Caribbean and Mexico he returned with a party of Spaniards, resumed his life with his people, and may have taken part in extirpating the Jesuit mission.

Some eastern Indians definitely knew about the failed English attempt in the 1580s to establish a colony on the outer banks of what became North Carolina. They may also have learned something about England from reports that Manteo, one of the Indians who traveled there in the 1580s, brought back when he rejoined his family in the New World. Manteo astonished the English as Paquiquineo had astonished the Spanish by forsaking what Europeans re-garded as their superior civilizations in favor of life with their families in what Europeans saw as a wilderness.

Documents

Virginians and Their Histories...2 virginians and their histories largely political and military. It underestimated the importance of events in the historical experience that did not