VINE COURT HALLS OF RESIDENCES DESIGN STAGE REPORT · 2020. 9. 2. · stride treglown job no. 12561 prepared by ami pandit checked by fleur baguley date 30th march 2012 file 12561_r0_120330_final

STRIDE TREGLOWN JOB NO. 12561

PREPARED BY AMI PANDIT

CHECKED BY FLEUR BAGULEY

DATE 30TH MARCH 2012

FILE 12561_R0_120330_FINAL REPORT.DOC

REVISION NO. -

VINE COURT HALLS OF RESIDENCES

DESIGN STAGE REPORT

FINAL REPORT

30TH MARCH 2012

2 of 75

BRE Environmental &

Sustainability Standard

BREEAM Multi-Residential Assessment

Report

Vine Court Halls of Residences, Liverpool

Prepared for: - University of Liverpool

30th March 2012 [ST-BESEC-ADC01-8]

Prepared on behalf of Stride Treglown Management Ltd by

Name Ami Pandit

Position BREEAM Assessor

Signature

Approved on behalf of Stride Treglown Management Ltd by

Name Fleur Baguley

Position Head of BREEAM

Date 30th March 2012

Signature

Stride Treglown Management Ltd Promenade House The Promenade T + 44 (0) 117 9743271 F + 44 (0) 117 9745207 E [email protected] www.stridetreglown.co.uk

Disclaimer This report is made on behalf Stride Treglown Management. By receiving the report and acting on it, the client - or any third party relying on it - accepts that no individual is personally liable in contract, tort or breach of statutory duty (including negligence). Copyright Copyright exists on the BREEAM logo and this may not be used or reproduced for any purpose without the prior written consent of the BRE. The BREEAM name and logo are registered trademarks of the Building Research Establishment Limited.

STML report no 12561 BRE reference no ST-BESCE-ADC01-8

© Building Research Establishment Ltd 2006 Commercial in confidence

Executive Summary

Stride Treglown Management Ltd has been commissioned to carry out a BREEAM Multi-Residential assessment of the new Vine Court Halls of Residences at the University of Liverpool.

This report outlines the performance of Vine Court Halls of Residences against the current BREEAM Multi-

Residential 2006 criteria. The building currently achieves a score of 70.74%, which is a BREEAM Multi-

Residential rating of Excellent. The assessor has determined this rating using an auditable trail of

evidence, all of which is referenced throughout this report.



Contents

BREEAM Multi-Residential Certificate Information 1

Introduction 3

BREEAM Multi-Residential 3

BREEAM Multi-Residential Scoring 3

Project Team 5

Building Details 6

Summary of Building Performance 8

Score Calculation 8

Detailed Assessment Information 9

Management 9

Health and Wellbeing 17

Energy 28

Transport 35

Water 42

Materials 47

Land Use and Ecology 55

Pollution 63

Appendix – Scoring spreadsheet and Calculator tools

BREEAM Multi-Residential Certificate Information

Certificate Request Form

Assessment Details

BRE reference number (provided on registration.)* ST-BESEC-ADC01-8

Assessment type* Multi-residential 2006

Assessment stage* Design and Procurement

Date of accompanying report* 30th March 2012

Net floor area assessed* 13038 m2

Assessment Details required to appear on the certificate. (Please recreate this box for every certificate required, add extra rows for additional parties/stakeholders as required)

Building name/Plot number/Building or site address*

Vine Court Halls of Residences

University of Liverpool,

35, Myrtle Street,

Liverpool

L7 7AJ

BREEAM Multi-Residential rating* Excellent

BREEAM Multi-Residential percentage* 70.74%

Assessor organisation* Stride Treglown Management Ltd

Assessor name* Ami Pandit

Architect / Design Team Stride Treglown Limited

Developer / Client University of Liverpool

Service Engineer White Young Green

BREEAM Multi-Residential version* 2006



* Mandatory information to be provided to BRE for a certificate to be issued.

Certificates to be sent to:

Assessor / Client

(a photocopy of the original certificate will always be sent to the assessor.)

Company name: Stride Treglown Management Ltd Number of certificates:02

Contact person: Ami Pandit

Address: Promenade House The Promenade Clifton Down Bristol BS8 3NE

Tel: 017 9743271

Fax: 0117 9745207

Email: [email protected]



Introduction

Stride Treglown Management Ltd has been commissioned to carry out a BREEAM Multi-Residential Multi-

residential 2006 assessment of Vine Court Halls of Residences for the University of Liverpool.

BREEAM Multi-Residential

BREEAM Multi-Residential is part of the BREEAM family of environmental assessment methods (BRE’s

Environmental Assessment Method) and is a voluntary scheme that aims to quantify and reduce the

environmental burdens of buildings by rewarding those designs that take positive steps to minimise their

environmental impacts.

BREEAM Multi-Residential was launched in September 2005 reflecting the need to assess buildings that

are beyond the scope of the standard EcoHomes scheme. BREEAM Multi-Residential uses a standard set

of criteria applicable to student halls, key worker accommodation, sheltered housing, hostels such as

emergency accommodation and other types of multi-occupancy residential buildings.

Projects are assessed using a system of credits. The credits are grouped within the following categories:

• Management

• Energy

• Transport

• Health and Well Being

• Water

• Materials and Waste

• Land use

• Site Ecological Value

• Pollution

The assessment process results in a report covering the issues assessed together with a formal

certification giving a rating on a scale of PASS, GOOD, VERY GOOD and EXCELLENT.

BREEAM Multi-Residential Scoring

Within each of the BREEAM Multi-Residential categories outlined above, there are a number of credit

requirements that reflect the options available to designers and managers of buildings.

The assessment splits the building into function categories including: self contained flats; individual

bedrooms; kitchen & catering areas; general communal areas; offices; meeting rooms; leisure areas; health

areas; laundry and all other occupied spaces. Credits are applicable to different function categories within

the building for example HW3, Glare Control which is only applicable to offices, meeting rooms and study

bedrooms. Other credits are applicable to the whole building. To reflect this, credit scores are area

weighted according to the floor area within the building that the credits have been achieved. This



recognises the environmental benefits of achieving a credit in an area that represents a large proportion of

the building compared to where a credit is achieved in only a small proportion of the building.

An environmental weighting is applied to the scores achieved under each category, as shown below, in

order to calculate the final BREEAM Multi-Residential score. The weighting factors have been derived from

consensus based research with various groups such as government, material suppliers and lobbyists. This

research was carried out by BRE to establish the relative importance of each environmental issue.

The environmental weightings are as follows:

Issue Category Issue

Weighting

Management 0.15

Health and Wellbeing 0.15

Energy -

Transport -

Energy and Transport 0.25

Water 0.5

Materials and Waste 0.10

Land Use and Ecology 0.15

Pollution 0.15

The BREEAM Multi-Residential rating bands are as follows:

RATING SCORE

PASS 25

GOOD 40

VERY GOOD 55

EXCELLENT 70



Project Team

Position Company and address / name

Architect Andrew Burton

Stride Treglown Limited

Commercial Wharf, 6 Commercial Street,

Manchester, M15 4PZ

M&E Neil McLoughry, Neil Smith

WYG ENGINEERING LTD

Regatta House, Clippers Quay, Salford Quays,

Manchester, M50 3XP

Project Manager Chris Seddon, Neville Patterson

Gleeds Cost Management Limited

Stanley Hall, Edmund Street,

Liverpool L3 9NG

Contractor Steve Jerams

Ocon Constructions Ltd

The Place, Ducie Street,

Manchester, M1 2TP

Client Darren Clark

Capital Projects, Facilities Management, University of Liverpool

2nd Floor, Bedford House, Oxford Street,

Liverpool, L69 7ZP



Building Details

General Building Vine Court Halls of Residences

Site University of Liverpool,

35 Myrtle Street,

Liverpool,

L7 7AJ

Floor area Gross area – 22895 m2

Net area – 13038m2

Building fabric Walls External walls –

Type 1 - Brickwork, cement mortar, cement-bonded particle board

sheathing, insulation, light steel frame, vapour control layer,

plasterboard on battens, paint

Type 2 - Standing seam zinc sheets plywood sheathing, breather

membrane, PIR foam board insulation, aluminium support brackets

and rails on primary steel frame. Internal leaf of cement board on

SFS with 2 layers of 15mm plasterboard, skim plaster and paint

Internal walls –

Type 1 - Galvanised steel stud, plasterboard, paint

Type 2 - Acoustic separating walls

Type 3 - Lightweight solid blockwork with plaster, paint

Type 4 - Lightweight solid blockwork, painted finish

Roof Type 1 - In situ reinforced concrete, oxidised polyester reinforced

bitumen roofing membranes, insulation, paving slabs

Type 2 - In situ reinforced concrete, oxidised polyester reinforced

bitumen roofing membranes, insulation, rounded pebbles

Type 3 - In situ reinforced concrete, hot melt rubberised bitumen

waterproofing layer, insulation, green roof build-up

Type 4 - In situ reinforced concrete, hot melt rubberised bitumen

waterproofing layer, insulation, brown roof build-up

Type 5 - Standing seam zinc sheets plywood sheathing, breather



membrane, PIR foam board insulation, timber joists

Floor Ground floor –

Type 1 - Screeded in situ concrete slab, over insulation on

polyethylene dpm laid on blinded recycled aggregate sub-base

Type 2 - Screed on insulation laid on in situ concrete on


Type 3 - Powerfloated in situ concrete slab, over insulation on


Upper floor – Power floated in situ reinforced concrete floor slab

Building Services

Heating Renewables; Air source heating with local controls. Radiators with

TRVs. Under-floor heating to the restaurant/eating areas.

Ventilation Natural ventilation and possible use of trickle vents

Cooling Mechanical ventilation – heat recovery systems on all air handling

units. Plate heat exchanger and extract fans.

Hot water Renewables - solar hot water. Centralised system.

BMS A building energy management system will be used to control all

aspects of the M&E services in an energy efficient manner.



Summary of Building Performance

Vine Court Halls of Residences currently achieves a score of 70.74% against the BREEAM Multi-

Residential criteria. This translates into an overall BREEAM Multi-Residential rating of Excellent.

Score Calculation

The table below illustrates how the BREEAM Multi-Residential score has been calculated.

Issu

e C

ate

go

ry

% o

f C

red

its

Ach

iev

ed

(

[a/b

]x100

=

c)

Issu

e W

eig

hti

ng

(d

)

Weig

hte

d S

co

re

Ach

iev

ed

([

cxd

=e)

Management 84.62% 15% 12.7% Health and Wellbeing 69.32% 15% 10.4%

Energy 81.51% Transport 77.78%

Energy and Transport 80.29% 25% 20.1% Water 87.50% 5% 4.4%

Materials and Waste 26.32% 10% 2.6% Land use & Ecology 80.00% 15% 12.0%

Pollution 57.14% 15% 8.6% Weighted Score 70.74%

The BREEAM Multi-Residential rating bands show that a score of 70.74% translates into a BREEAM Multi-

Residential rating of Excellent:

RATING SCORE

PASS 25

GOOD 40

VERY GOOD 55

EXCELLENT 70



Detailed Assessment Information

The following section summarises each of the credit requirements, and the information that has been provided relating to Vine Court Halls of Residences against each credit, to allow the appropriate number of credits to be awarded.

Management

M1 Commissioning 2 of 2 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an appropriate project team member has been

appointed to monitor commissioning on behalf of the client to ensure commissioning will be carried out in

line with current Building Regulations and (where applicable), best practice.

One credit where the above credit has been achieved and evidence provided demonstrates that seasonal

commissioning will be carried out during the first year of occupation, post construction (or post fit out).

Credit validation

Commissioning:

A copy of the M&E specifications has been provided by White Young Green. The Section A90 provided

details regarding commissioning.

It has been stated that the commissioning will be carried out according to the CIBSE / BSRIA guidelines

and the commissioning and seasonal commissioning will be carried out as per the BREEAM guidelines.

A number of simple and complex systems are listed in the document.

The document and the report from WYG confirmed that a specialist commissioning agent will be appointed

for pre commissioning, commissioning and any re commissioning of complex systems and an appropriate

team member will be appointed for pre commissioning, commissioning and any re commissioning of simple

systems.

First credit awarded.

Seasonal commissioning:

The section A90 of the M&E specification confirmed that the Contractor must provide seasonal

commissioning during the first year of occupation, post construction (or post fit out) in line with BREEAM

requirements.

As part of this there must be a review of the thermal comfort, ventilation and lighting at 3, 6 and 9 month

intervals after occupation, either by measurement or occupant feedback.



An email from WYG to project manager confirmed that items a-d with regards to seasonal commissioning of

complex systems will be complied with during and post construction stage.

Second credit awarded.

Credit references

1. BREEAM report – WYG – February 2011 (12561_M1_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)

2. M&E specification – A90 – Tender issue – WYG- 28th January 2010 (12561_M1_110615_A039443

VOLUME 1 - UoL Chatham St Residencies Preliminaries rev T1.pdf)

3. Email – Ocon to Stride Treglown Ltd – 11th March 2011 (12561_M1_110314_Ocon BREEAM

Credits Confirmation M1 M2 M3 E6 LE2.msg)

4. Email – WYG to assessor – 15th June 2011 (12561_M1_110615_BREEAM Queries Various.msg)

5. Email – WYG to Project manager – 30th March 2012 (12561_M1_120330_chatham st M1.msg)

Further information/action

No further information required.

M2 Considerate Constructors 2 of 2 credits achieved

Credit Criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that there is a commitment to comply with best practice

site management principles.

Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that there is a commitment to go significantly beyond

best practice site management principles.

Credit validation

The email from Ocon stated that they have registered with the Considerate Constructors scheme. Ocon

have had the first inspection by CCS, and await the score for that visit. It is confirmed that they intend to get

in excess of 32 marks on average which will give 2 credits.

A copy of the CCS inspectors first visit report is provided. It can be confirmed that the site achieved a total

score of 35.5 with at least 4 points in each section.

2 credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Email – Ocon – 14th March 2011 – (12561_M2_110314_Ocon BREEAM Credits Confirmation M1

M2 M3 E6 LE2.msg)

2. CCS inspector – 1st visit score – 18

th March 2011 – (12561_M2_110318_CCS.pdf)

3. Checklist a1 – 13th January 2012 (12561_M2_120113_ChecklistA1_Rev00.pdf)




No information is required.

M3 Construction site impacts 4 of 4 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit is available where evidence provided demonstrates that 2 or more of items a-g, listed below are

achieved.

Two credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates that 4 or more of items a-g, listed below

are achieved.

Three credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates that 6 or more of items a-g, listed below

are achieved.

a. monitor, report and set targets for CO2 or energy arising from site activities;

b. monitor, report and set targets for CO2 or energy arising from transport to and from site;

c. monitor, report and set targets for water consumption arising from site activities;

d. monitor construction waste on site;

e. sort and recycle construction waste;

f. adopt best practice policies in respect of air (dust) pollution arising from the site;

g. adopt best practice policies in respect of water (ground and surface) pollution occurring on the site.

One additional credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all site timber is responsibly sourced.

Credit validation

The email from Ocon confirmed that all items except item b are being sought. The fourth credit is also being

sought.

Items a and c:

A letter from Ocon confirmed the following:

• Monthly energy use, water use, and diesel deliveries are recorded and displayed on site, within the

Construction Resource Monitoring Report.

• Appropriate project and average monthly target levels will be set and displayed;

• Monitoring will include checking the meters / diesel deliveries, and displaying a graphical analysis in

the CRM Report in the site office, to show consumption over the project duration and how actual

consumption compares to the targets set;

• Steve Jerams as site manager will be responsible for this.



A template sheet that is being used for achieving the items is provided by Ocon.

Items a and c achieved.

Items d and e:

The letter from Ocon confirmed the following-

• The site’s construction waste will be monitored, both on site, and via regular updates from our

Waste Management Contractor;

• A Site Waste Management plan has been produced in order to help to manage the site construction

waste produced, records from the Waste Contractor will also be collated;

• Waste projections have been made to benchmark performance;

• Waste will be sorted on site and collected for recycling by a specialist waste management

contractor;

• As can be seen from the SWMP documents, construction waste will be sorted into a number of

waste streams such as ceramics, inert, metal, packaging, plastics, concrete, etc. where produced,

and reused/recycled as appropriate.

An extract from the SWMP is provided to support the above confirmations. A copy of the environmental

plan has been provided which discussed the principles.

Items d and e achieved.

Item f:

The letter from Ocon confirmed that the following procedures will be used on site in order to minimise air /

dust pollution:

• ‘dust sheets’ will be used on stockpiles of friable materials,

• regular damping down of the site will occur in dry weather,

• Skips will be provided with covers.

• This will form part of the site induction by review of the Environmental Plan.

A copy of the site induction form is provided and points 17 and 22 specifically refer to the above. Section

6.4 of the environmental plan confirmed the above procedures.

Items f achieved.

Item g:

The letter from Ocon confirmed that the site procedures have been set up to minimise water pollution by

following the site applicable best‐practice guidelines outlined in the following Environment Agency

documents, these guidelines have been extracted and incorporated within the project specific

Environmental Plan:

• PPG 1 – General guide to the prevention of pollution;

• PPG 5 – Works in, near or liable to affect watercourses;



• PPG 6 – Working at demolition and construction sites;

It is stated that this will form part of the site induction by review of the Environmental Plan.

A copy of the site induction form is provided and points 17 and 22 specifically refer to the above. Section

6.5 and 6.6 of the environmental plan confirmed the above procedures.

Items g achieved.

Thus at least 6 items from the checklist are achieved. 3 credits awarded.

Fourth credit:

The letter from Ocon confirmed that 80% of timber used during construction, including formwork, site

hoardings and other temporary site timber used for the purpose of facilitating construction, is to be procured

from sustainably managed sources, independently certified by one of FSC or PEFC.

In addition it is confirmed that all timber utilised on site will be legally sourced.

Fourth credit achieved.

4 credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Email – Ocon – 14th March 2011 – (12561_M3_110314_Ocon BREEAM Credits Confirmation M1

M2 M3 E6 LE2.msg)

2. Letter – Ocon – 16th February 2012 (12561_M3_120216_Breeam A3 - Letter.pdf)

3. Template – energy and water monitoring – Ocon – 16th February 2012

(12561_M3_120216_Evidence No 1.doc)

4. SWMP extract – Ocon – 16th February 2012 (12561_M3_120216_Evidence No 2 - Vine Court

Liverpool forecast of waste.doc)

5. Site induction form – Ocon – 16th February 2012 (12561_M3_120216_Evidence No 4 - Vine Court

Induction Form january 2012.doc)

6. Environmental plan – Ocon – 6th January 2012 (12561_M3_120216_Evidence No 5 - Vine Court

Liverpool University Environmental Plan Revision 06 06.01.2012.doc)



M4 Stakeholder Consultation 2 of 2 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that consultation has been, or is being, undertaken and

feedback given to the local community and building users.



Two credits where, in addition to the above, evidence provided demonstrates that changes to the design

and/or action has been taken as a result of the above consultation process.

Credit validation

First credit:

The extract from the planning report has been provided, which confirmed that various stakeholders were

identified including directors, vice-chancellor, head of various departments of the University, ALO,

University’s technical team representatives from various departments, local residents, Art and Heritage

committee, access consultants etc.

In addition to the above various documents have been provided with a brief report explaining the following:

1. Consultation pamphlet - Pamphlet inviting the local community and University groups to the

Consultation session is provided.

2. Key Users

The main consultation has been with the key user to ensure all operational objectives have been

met, based on actual experience of running accommodation on and off campus and understanding

the growth needs of the University in the current market against the changing needs of the student.

In addition they have had and maintain close relationship with the Management School whereby

they discussed the proposed project and identified potential impacts and required mitigation. The

benefits have been the potential release of space in the Management School currently used as a

cafe which will be replaced by the new build. In addition, some of the accommodation will be aimed

at Management School graduates.

3. Public Consultation

Public Consultations were held to allow the UoL to brief the wider staff & student community who

live and work on campus and also the local community from the surrounding areas. Constructive

feedback was obtained from the process, and a clearer understanding of what the project actually

involved and how it would affect the surrounding area was more accurately portrayed.

4. Georgian Quarter Community Group

The University attends the Georgian Quarter Community Group whereby great neighbourhood

relationships have been developed and the community have been able to further develop an insight

to the needs of the University and similarly we have developed a greater understanding of the

issues faced by our neighbours.

5. Construction Community Group

There is a construction community group meeting held between Ocon and a representative of the

local community reviewing works as they progress and any neighbourhood issues they may arise.

6. Project Control Group

The Project Control Group is a collective forum including the Guild of Students reviewing the

development and delivery of the scheme against its strategic objectives, meeting every month.

7. Consultation

4a. Appearance



The appearance was discussed and reviewed extensively during design reviews with the

University, with the wider Community and University Students at the Open Day (see Open Day

comments schedule), with the Planners (see Planning Committee Report) and CABE (see CABE

Consultation)

4b. Function and Design Requirements

This was discussed extensively during regular briefing and design team meetings. See minutes.

4c. Occupant Satisfaction / productivity


4d. Management and operational implications


4e. Maintenance resource / burdens


4f. Potential transport impacts

This was discussed extensively during regular briefing and design team meetings. See attached

minutes. The outcome of which became the Travel Plans and Reports which have already been

issued by the design team and referenced in relevant credits of this report.

4g. Facilities / infrastructure the project could offer to the Community

The Open Day consultation included the proposal that the Restaurant and Cafe would be

accessible to the local Community. See the Consultation Boards.

8. Consultation with Local Bodies

It has been confirmed that the Local Authorities have been extensively consulted. Please refer to

the attached Planning Committee Report document.

9. Feedback to Consultation Groups

A document has been provided by the design team which is the Response to Residents Objections

that was issued to everyone who attended the Consultation Open Day.

First credit awarded.

Second credit:

It has been stated in the report extract that the project brief was tweaked following consultation with the

technical teams and directors of the University.

It is also stated that about three meetings took place with Liverpool City Council and a number of issues

such as height and massing, access, materials, design, urban principles, public realm etc were discussed.

It has been stated that as a result of these meetings and a series of consultations with other bodies and

local residents, the building heights were reduced from 8 stories to 4-5 storey buildings.

CABE was also consulted and a result of which, the elevations and materials were changed. The details

and views (before and after the consultations) are given in another extract of the report.



Second credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Supporting information – Design team – October 2011 – (Folder - 12561_M4_111104_M4_Info for

October)

2. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd to assessor - 26th May 2011 - (12561_M4_110526_BREEAM M4.msg)

3. Planning report extract 1 – Stride Treglown Ltd – (12561_M4_110526_Stakeholder Consultation

extract from the Planning Report.pdf)

4. Report extract 2 – Stride Treglown Ltd – (12561_M4_110526_Stakeholder Consultation

modifications to building.pdf)

5. Consultation summary report – Stride Treglown Ltd – 17th October 2011

(12561_M4_111017_45050_111017_BREEAM remaining info response.doc)

6. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd to assessor – 17th October 2011 – (12561_M4_111017_M4 HW6 and

11 Information.msg)



M5 Building User Guide 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates the provision of a simple guide that covers information

relevant to the residents and ‘non-technical’ building manager / staff on the operation and environmental

performance of the building and relevant information relating to the site and its surroundings.

Credit validation

The BREEAM report provided by WYG confirmed that a simple guide that covers information relevant to the

residents and ‘non-technical’ building manager / staff on the operation and environmental performance of

the building and relevant information relating to the site and its surroundings will be provided.

It is stated that this will be detailed in the M&E specification under the O&M contents list, separate section

in order to meet BREEAM requirement. This is also confirmed in the section A37 of the M&E specification.

An email from the architect confirmed that they will be producing an appropriate document with at least the

contents required in the Full Guidance document, which are in line with BREEAM requirement. :

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. BREEAM report – WYG – 21st February 2011 – (12561_M5_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)

2. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd to assessor – 3rd

April 2011 – (12561_M5_110403_BREEAM M5.msg)



3. M&E specification – WYG – (12561_M5_110615_A039443 VOLUME 1 - UoL Chatham St

Residencies Preliminaries rev T1.pdf)



M6 Security 0 of 2 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates a commitment to work with an Architectural Liaison

Officer and to achieve the Secured by Design award.

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that security standards for external doors, doors to self

contained flats and windows achieve a minimum of either:

a. LPS1175 SR1 (all doors and windows) OR

b. PAS24-1 (all external pedestrian doorsets falling within the scope of PAS24-1) AND BS7950 (All

windows falling within the scope of BS7950).

Credit validation

This credit is not being sought.

Credit references

None



Health and Wellbeing

HW1 Daylighting 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit is available where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of floor area is adequately

day-lit.

Credit validation

Credit not sought



Credit references

None



HW2 View Out 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that:

1. All workstations / desks in office and IT areas have a view out and are within a 7m radius of a window AND

2. All study bedrooms in student halls have a view out with the desk within a 7m radius of a window AND 3. All living rooms (in self contained flats), communal sitting areas or individual bedrooms/bedsits in

sheltered housing have a view out within a maximum radius of 5m of a window. Credit validation

All floor plans and the typical room layouts have been provided by the architect. It can be confirmed that all

study bedrooms have a view out with the desk within a 7m radius of a window. All living rooms, communal

sitting areas have a view out within a 5m radius of a window.

The offices are no more than 7m in depth. The furniture layout is also provided. It can be confirmed that

view out is achievable in all offices within 7m of radius.

The courtyards in both east and west blocks are more than 10m in width and depth. Thus any rooms facing

courtyards are still compliant.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd to assessor – 3rd

April 2011 (12561_HW2_110403_BREEAM HW2

views out #1 of 3.msg)

2. Drawings – Stride Treglown Ltd – 3rd

April 2011 – (Folder - 12561_HW2_110403_View Out

Drawings)





HW3 Glare control 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an occupant controlled glare control system (e.g.

internal or external blinds) is fitted to all areas where computer workstations will located, close work will be

undertaken or visual aids will be used (such as projectors etc).

Credit validation

Sliding shutters are to be specified in each of the student rooms. However, the BRE have confirmed that

these shutters do not comply with the BREEAM specification due to the ‘all or nothing’ approach.

Credit withheld

Credit references

1. Email - Assessor to BRE -13th April 2010 (12561_HW3_100413_BREEAM glare control.msg)

2. Email - BRE to assessor - 21st April 2010 (12561_HW3_100419_TMRQ1126 Multi Res 2006 HW3

ST-BESEC-ADC01-8 glare control.msg)

3. Photograph of the shutter open (12561_HW3_100421_shutter picture 1.jpg)

4. Photograph of the shutter closed (12561_HW3_100421_shutter picture 2.jpg)



HW4 High frequency lighting 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that high frequency ballasts are installed on all

fluorescent and compact fluorescent lamps.

Credit validation

The BREEAM response from WYG stated that High frequency ballasts will be proposed for all fluorescent

and compact fluorescent lamps, to avoid discomfort from flicker.

The M&E specification V21 confirmed that high frequency ballasts are specified to all fluorescent and

compact fluorescent lamps.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. BREEAM report – WYG – 21st February 2011 (12561_HW4_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)



2. M&E specification – WYG – 15th November 2010 (12561_HW4_110221_A039443_UoL

Residences_Elec Spec_Vol 2_Contract Issue_15.11.10.pdf)



HW5 Internal and external lighting levels 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all internal and external lighting, where relevant, is

specified in accordance with the appropriate maintained illuminance levels (in lux) recommended by

CIBSE.

Credit validation

The specification V21 stated that all communal corridors and those associated with the residential areas

should comply with LG9. It is stated that certain lights will be illuminated for 24 hrs to maintain certain

illumination levels, the rest will be BMS/presence detector controlled during daytime and evening.

The email from the architect and statement confirmed that the design has been carried out in accordance

with the relevant CIBSE guidance, LG6, LG7 and LG9, where relevant.

Credit awarded.

Credit references



2. BREEAM report – WYG – 21st February 2011 (12561_HW5_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)

3. Credit confirmation – Stride Treglown Ltd – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW5_110606_A039443 UoL

BREEAM 02_06_11.pdf

4. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW5_110606_BREEAM M&E - Copy.msg)





HW6 Potential for Natural Ventilation 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that external façade windows to all occupied areas are

openable.

Credit validation

This credit applies to all areas, except for the laundry facilities.

An email was sent to the BRE as due to the multi-storey building the window openings were restricted by

the Building Control. The BRE in response to query TMRQ1074 stated that provided that you can prove or

provide evidence that there will be sufficient ventilation with the restricted openings then the credit may be

given.

Drawings have been provided by Stride Treglown Ltd confirming the room areas and window details.

It is stated in the WYG report that all rooms are mechanically ventilated but openable windows are provided

as an additional feature. The email from the architect stated that in order to achieve the openable area (i.e.

5%) the windows will have to open to 250mm.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email - assessor and BRE - 1st March 2010 (12561_HW6_100301_FW TMRQ1074 - Multi res

Hea 7 credit.msg)

2. Room areas and window detail drawings – (folder - 12561_HW6_111104_drawings)

3. BRREEAM report – WYG – 21st February 2011 (12561_HW6_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)

4. Email – WYG – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW6_110606_BREEAM M&E.msg)

5. East block ventilation calculation – WYG – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW6_110606_East Block Vent

Calcs.pdf)

6. West block ventilation calculation – WYG – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW6_110606_West Block Vent

Calcs.pdf)

7. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 17th October 2011 (12561_HW6_111017_45050_B26_111017_M4

HW6 and 11 Information.msg)

8. Credit confirmation – Stride Treglown Ltd – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW6_110606_A039443 UoL

BREEAM 02_06_11.pdf


No further information required



HW7 Internal Air Pollution 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where air intakes serving occupied areas avoid major sources of external pollution and

recirculation of exhaust air.

Credit validation


Credit references

None


No further information is required.

HW 8 Ventilation Rates 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that each space within the development achieves

recommended minimum fresh air rates.

Credit validation

The BREEAM report provided by WYG stated that all rooms are mechanically ventilated, although

openable windows are provided as an additional feature.

The report stated that all ventilation rates will be in accordance with CIBSE Guide B2. The M&E specification

U10 is also provided. Schedule M34 is provided confirming the specification and ventilation rates for the

bedrooms and studios.

It is stated that office areas will have a fresh rate at 10 l/s/p, which is less than 12l/s/p. Credit withheld in

office areas.

The room ventilation calculations are provided for each type room in east and west blocks. Where relevant,

whole house ventilation rates are applicable, as can be seen in the specification/calculations.

Credit awarded in all areas except the office areas.

Credit references


2. Email – WYG – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW8_110606_BREEAM M&E.msg)

3. East block ventilation calculation – WYG – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW8_110606_East Block Vent

Calcs.pdf)



4. West block ventilation calculation – WYG – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW8_110606_West Block Vent

Calcs.pdf)

5. M&E specification – U10 – WYG – 15th November 2010 (12561_HW8_110221_A039443_UoL

Residences_Mech Spec_Vol 3_Contract Issue_15.11.10.pdf)

6. Schedule M34 – WYG – (12561_HW8_120225_Equipment Schedule M34 - Wholehouse Vent.pdf)

7. Email – WYG – 25th February 2012 (12561_HW8_120225_Chatham st additional information

required.msg)



HW9 Thermal Zoning 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that local occupant control is available for temperature

adjustment in both communal and residential areas to reflect differing load requirements.

Credit validation

This credit applies to all areas/functions of the halls of residence.

The BREEAM report by WYG stated that

• Accommodation areas will be heated by VRF systems and therefore will be individually controlled.

• Circulation areas will be heated by a wet system controlled by thermostatic control valves.

• All other areas will be locally controlled in some form of manner.

The specification T31 stated that the radiators will be fitted with TRVs and will be located as required by

BREEAM credit HW9.

The specification T62 stated that the heating / cooling to study bedrooms and associated living, kitchens etc

will be provided by air source heat pumps. It is stated that each room will be provided with a local control

box and control panel.

The offices and student services areas are provided cooling through refrigerant based system, which

interacts with the AHU. It is stated that the local control will be provided as described above for the VRVs.

An email and associated marked up drawings from the architect to the assessor, confirmed any area which

is more than 7m from an external wall. These areas are minimal and form the entrances to rooms. Entrance

areas can therefore be excluded from this requirement. The email from WYG confirmed that all rooms are

individually controlled with controllers sited within 7m of the outside walls.

The specification T31 confirmed that the restaurant and reception areas are provided with LTHW under

floor heating system. It is stated that temperature sensors with an adjustable set point provision will be

provided to each space.



A further email from WYG confirmed that where under floor heating is used, a secondary responsive

system in that the mechanical ventilation in the areas also provides heating. The under floor heating has

sensors to allow 7m zoning from external walls with any central zones controlled separately. Total depth in

any part of the restaurant is no more than 15m in depth.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from Architect to Assessor, dated 28th June 2010 (12561_HW9_100628_BREEAM HW9

drawings.msg)

2. Drawing - SK155 – Stride Treglown Architects, HW9 East Block Typical Floor, dated 28th June

2010 (12561_HW9_100628_45050_SK155_BREEAM HW9 East Block Typical floor.pdf)

3. Drawing - SK156 – Stride Treglown Architects, HW9 East Block 6th Floor, dated 28th June 2010

(12561_HW9_100628_45050_SK156_BREEAM HW9 East Block 6th floor.pdf)

4. Drawing - SK157 – Stride Treglown Architects, HW9 West Block 6th Floor, dated 28th June 2010

(12561_HW9_100628_45050_SK157_BREEAM HW9 West Block 6th floor.pdf)




7. Email – WYG – 15th November 2011 (12561_HW9_111115_Chatham Street - BREEAM -

Outstanding D&P information.msg)


required.msg)

9. Drawing – E700 series – WYG (12561_HW9_120229_A039443_E700 Series Elec

Drawings_Contract_15.11.10.pdf)



HW10 Microbial Contamination 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the risk of waterborne and airborne legionella contamination has been minimised.

Credit validation

The BREEAM report provided by WYG stated that all water and HVAC systems will be designed to meet

the requirements of HSE L8.

The specification S11 states compliance with CIBSE TM13, HSE and Guidance L8.



The confirmation has been provided that there is no humidification.

Credit awarded.

Credit references



2. BRREEAM report – WYG – 21st February 2011 (12561_HW10_110221_BREEAM 2006

Report.doc)

3. Email – WYG – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW10_110606_BREEAM M&E - Copy.msg)

4. Statement – WYG – 6th June 2011 (12561_HW10_110606_A039443 UoL BREEAM 02_06_11.pdf)



HW11 Sound Insulation 3 of 4 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit is available where there is a commitment to carry out a programme of pre-completion testing

based on the frequency listed in Table 2, column A (Supplementary Guidance A: Frequency of Testing

Required) for every group or sub-group of flats or study bedrooms* AND a commitment to achieve the

performance standards set out in the Building Regulations for England and Wales, Approved Document E

(2003 Edition).

Two credits are available where there is a commitment to carry out a programme of pre-completion testing

based on the frequency listed in Table 2, column B (Supplementary Guidance A: Frequency of Testing

Required) for every group or sub-group of flats or study bedrooms* AND a commitment to achieve the

performance standards set out in the Building Regulations for England and Wales, Approved Document E

(2003 Edition).

Three credits are available where there is a commitment to carry out a programme of pre-completion

testing based on the frequency listed in Table 2, column B (Supplementary Guidance A: Frequency of

Testing Required) for every group or sub-group of flats or study bedrooms* AND a commitment to achieve

airborne sound insulation values that are at least 3dB higher, and impact sound insulation values that are at

least 3dB lower, than the performance standards set out in the Building Regulations for England and

Wales, Approved Document E (2003 Edition).

Four credits are available where there is a commitment to carry out a programme of pre-completion testing

based on the frequency listed in Table 2, column B (Supplementary Guidance A: Frequency of Testing

Required) for every group or sub-group of flats or study bedrooms* AND a commitment to achieve airborne

sound insulation values that are at least 5dB higher, and impact sound insulation values that are at least

5dB lower, than the performance standards set out in the Building Regulations for England and Wales,

Approved Document E (2003 Edition).



Credit validation

This credit applies only to all bedroom areas of this development.

The acoustic report from White Young Green considers that an increase of 3dB may be required for sound

insulation on the basis of achieving the associated credits.

The report confirms that the proposed measures for Chatham Street Residences, are capable of meeting

Requirements E1, E2 and E3 of Approved Document E of the Building Regulations along with achieving

+3dB for sound insulation and -3dB for impact sound insulation, provided that the recommendations

contained within the report are implemented and that suitable design detailing is used.

The email attachment from the architect confirmed the recommendations of the WYG Acoustic Report are

being followed. The detailed drawings indicating the details of internal walls, extracts from the Specification

noting the internal wall construction, the acoustic underlay for the floors and the floor build-up for the

penthouse units are provided.

The document provided also confirmed that the Building Control has approved the schedule of pre-

completion testing provided within the report. It states that the Building regulation Part E requires more

tests then BREEAM, column B and no of sub – groups are required. Therefore by meeting the tests

requirement of Building control, Table 2 column B will be complied with.

The report states that the testing shall only be carried out by an organisation deemed competent to do so

as defined in ADE such as an ANC accredited test organisation; furthermore the organisation shall be

competent acoustic designers/auditors such that any problems associated with the construction can be

accurately identified and rectified.

A further email from WYG confirmed that BRE now allows testing to be carried out by a body holding third-

party accreditation deemed to be equivalent to UKAS accreditation. WYG hold third-party accreditation

from the Association of Noise Consultants which is deemed to be equivalent to UKAS accreditation by

BRE.

3 credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from Architect to Assessor, dated 28th June 2010 (12561_HW11_100628_BREEAM HW11

Acoustic report.msg)

2. Report – Acoustic Report, White Young Green, dated 9th March 2010 (12561_HW11_100628_UoL

Halls of Residence - ADE & BREEAM Review ISSUE v4.pdf)

3. Drawings and specifications – Stride Treglown Ltd- 4th November 2011

(12561_HW11_111104_drawings and specifications)

4. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 4th November 2011 (12561_HW11_111017_45050_B26_111017_M4

HW6 and 11 Information - Copy.msg)

5. Architect’s confirmation – Stride Treglown Ltd – 4th November 2011

(12561_HW11_111017_45050_B26_111017_Copy45050_111017_BREEAM remaining info

response.doc)

6. Email – WYG – 25th February (12561_HW11_120225_Chatham st additional information

required.msg)



7. Email – WYG (12561_HW11_120225_Chatham st. additional information required.htm)



HW12 Home Office 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit is awarded where evidence demonstrates the provision of space and services which allows the

occupants to set up a home office in a quiet room.

Credit validation

Drawings have been provided for each type of accommodation within the project. The drawings provided

show the layout of the individual study bedrooms.

A window has been provided in each space, next to the study area of the room. The email from the

architect confirmed that these are openable windows for day lighting and ventilation.

From the drawings it can be confirmed that a minimum size of 1.8m wall length is available to allow a desk

and filing cabinet or bookshelf to be installed, with space to move around and open the door. An email from

the architect also confirmed this.

The M&E drawings have been provided, indicating the electrical layout confirming the provision of two

double sockets and data points.

A further email from WYG confirmed that each study bedroom has a double data point which can be used

for telephone, broadband etc.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from architect to assessor, dated 28th June 2010 (12561_HW12_100629_BREEAM HW12

information.msg)

2. Drawings - Stride Treglown Limited, dated 11th March 2010 (Folder –

12561_HW12_100411_architectural drawings)

3. Email – architect to assessor – 3rd

April 2011 (12561_HW12_110403_BREEAM HW12 Home office

#1 of 2.msg)

4. Drawings – WYG – (Folder - 12561_HW12_110403_M&E drawings)

5. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 27th January 2012 (12561_HW12_120127_BREEAM HW12 Home

office #1 of 2 Chatham Street.msg)


required.msg)





HW13 Outdoor Space 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence demonstrates the provision of an outdoor amenity space.

Credit validation

The scheme does not meet the criteria for this credit to be awarded as the requirement for 2m2 per

bedroom and requirement for security are not being met.

Credit withheld.

Credit references

1. Email from architect to assessor, dated 28th June 2010 (12561_HW13_100628_BREEAM HW13

Outdoor space.msg)

2. Drawing SK158, Stride Treglown Limited, dated 28th June 2010

(12561_HW13_100628_45050_SK158_BREEAM HW13 Outdoor space.pdf)

3. Email from BRE to assessor – 23rd

June 2011 (12561_HW13_110623_BREEAM Enquiry (12882)

Chatham Street - HW13 External Area not compliant.msg)



Energy

E1a Dwelling Emission Rate 0 of 15 credits achieved

Credit criteria

Up to 15 credits are awarded where the building demonstrates the minimisation of CO2 emissions based on

the Average Dwellings Emissions Rate from the SAP 2005 worksheets.

Credit validation

Credit not sought



Credit references

Credit not sought



E1b Reduction of CO2 emissions 12 of 15 credits achieved

Credit criteria

Up to 15 credits are awarded where the building demonstrates a percentage improvement above the

requirement for CO2 emissions as set out in the Building Regulations.

Credit validation

The project is student accommodation and as such, the flat clusters are to be assessed under this credit.

Email between BRE and assessor as well as Building control and Architect confirm the above.

The SBEM report / calculations have been provided along with Part L report by WYG for east and west

blocks.

East Block Results:

Notional = 63.8, Target = 45.9, BER = 16.4

This equates to 46.24% improvement over Building Regulations as per than calculator. 12 credits are

achievable.

West Block Results:

Notional = 64.5, Target = 46.5, BER = 16.6

This equates to 46.36% improvement over Building Regulations as per the calculator tool. 12 credits are

achievable.

The qualifications of the energy assessor Lisa Collins has been provided, who has originally prepared the

report. Lisa has now left WYG and any revisions (i.e. current BRUKL and EPC) are revised by Steve

Gallacher, who also has left WYG. An email from WYG confirmed that Steve’s professional qualifications

include GradEI and GradCIBSE.

12 credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Email between BRE and assessor, dated 24th February 2010 (12561_E1_100224_RE TMRQ1070

- Multires general query - Copy.msg)

2. Email – Building Control to architect – 21st February 2011 (12561_E1_110221_BREEAM query

clusters.msg)



3. Part L report – WYG (12561_E1b_110221_Chatham Street Part L Summary (complete).pdf)

4. Email – WYG – 25th February 2012 (12561_E1_120225_Chatham st additional information

required.msg)



E2 Building Fabric 0 of 2 credit achieved

Credit criteria

New Build

One credit where the Average Heat Loss Parameter (HLP) across the whole building / site is ≤ 1.3.

Two credits where the Average Heat Loss Parameter (HLP) across the whole building / site is ≤ 1.1.

Credit validation


Credit references

None



E3 Sub-metering of substantial energy uses

1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence is provided to demonstrate the provision of direct sub-metering of substantive

energy uses within the building.

Credit validation

The BREEAM report provided by WYG stated the following:

Sub meters are provided for significant energy uses within the building, these include:

• Space heating

• Cooling Plan



• Major fans

• Lighting

• Other major energy consuming items where appropriate

Sub-metering will be designed for each cluster of accommodation.

BEMS outstations will be provided to control/monitor all items of HVAC plant.

Controls to be zoned to allow efficient control and out of hours usage via the BEMS and local controls.

All sub-meters are specified with a pulsed output for remote monitoring.

The M&E specifications provided by WYG confirmed that in addition to the above the electricity is sub

metered for each flat cluster.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. BREEAM report – WYG – February 2011 (12561_E3_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)

2. M&E specification – electrical – WYG – 15th November 2010 (12561_E3_110221_A039443_UoL


3. M&E specification – mechanical – WYG – 15th November 2010 (12561_E3_110221_A039443_UoL




E4 Internal Luminaires 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence is provided to demonstrate that 75% of internal light fittings are dedicated

energy efficient fittings capable of only accepting lamps achieving an efficacy of 40 luminaire-lumens/Watt

or greater.

Credit validation

This credit is not sought.

Credit references

This credit is not sought





E5 External Luminaires 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

Where energy efficient external luminaires are specified and all light fittings controlled for the presence of

daylight.

Credit validation

The BREEAM report by WYG stated that External lighting luminaires will be provided with energy efficient

lamp sources. It also stated that all external lighting circuits will be controlled on photocell, and BMS system

time clock c/w manual override switch control.

The report by Stride Treglown Ltd stated that all external lighting specified is either LED or metal halide,

both of which meet the minimum luminaire-lumens/circuit-watt requirements. The external lighting is

specified in section V41 of the specification and volume 4 gives the schedule of selected luminaires.

The M&E specifications are provided which are in line with the above.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. BREEAM report – WYG – February 2011 (12561_E5_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)

2. M&E specification – electrical – WYG – 15th November 2010 (12561_E5_110221_A039443_UoL


3. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd- 6th June 2011 (12561_E5_110606_BREEAM M&E - Copy.msg)

4. BREEAM Statements - Stride Treglown Ltd- 6th June 2011 (12561_E5_110606_A039443 UoL

BREEAM 02_06_11.pdf)



E6 Provision of Ecolabelled Fridges/Freezers


Credit criteria

Once credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all fridges, freezers and fridge/freezers have an A+

rating under the EU Energy Efficiency Labelling Scheme.

Credit validation

Fridges and freezers are to be specified as A+ rated. A further email from Ocon stated that - Ocon to

provide white goods with an A+ rating. FFE schedule has been provided by the architects.

Credit awarded.



Credit references

1. Email from Architect to Assessor dated 28th June 2010 (12561_E6_100628_BREEAM E6 and

7.msg)

2. Email – Ocon to Architect – 14th march 2011 (12561_E6_110314_Ocon BREEAM Credits

Confirmation M1 M2 M3 E6 LE2.msg)

3. FFE schedule – Stride Treglown Ltd – (12561_E6_110403_extract from FFE Item Schedule

Revision D.pdf)

4. Email - Stride Treglown Ltd – 3rd

April 2011 (12561_E6_110403_BREEAM E7.msg)



E7 Provision of Energy Efficient Laundry Equipment


Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that:

• Domestic washing machines and dishwashers have an A rating AND,

• Domestic washer dryers and tumble dryers have an B rating under the EU Energy Efficiency Labelling Scheme AND

• Commercial scale laundry facilities within the development will maximise opportunities for energy efficient operation.

Credit validation

The email from the architect confirmed that there are no dishwashers specified for the development. The

washer dryers specified are to be B rated and are provided in the FFE schedule.

There is also a communal laundry room within the development.

Manufacturer’s details are provided for the communal laundry, which as described by the project manager

in email is approved by BRE in another scheme at Bradford.

The Circuit literature state that to achieve the aim of the credit, either they can install a grey water recycling

alongside the laundry machine or install ‘eco’ feature introduced to the system providing significant water

saving, which is in line with the aim of the credit. It is demonstrated in the document that the eco feature

saves more water than the grey water recycling option and is environmentally more efficient.

As assessors we consider that the aim of the credit is achieved.

Credit awarded.



Credit references

1. Email- Architect 26th may 2011 (12561_E7_110526_Chatham Street E7 E8 W1 MW2 MW8

MW9.msg)

2. FFE schedule – Stride Treglown Ltd – (12561_E6_110403_extract from FFE Item Schedule

Revision D.pdf)


April 2011 (12561_E6_110403_BREEAM E7.msg)

4. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 2 – 3rd

April 2011 (12561_E7_110403_BREEAM E7 Laundrette

equipment.msg)

5. Laundry info – manufacturer (12561_E7_110317_laundry info.pdf)



E8 Drying Space 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that space and posts/footings/fixings for drying clothes

will be provided in a secure environment for each dwelling in the building. This may be external or internal.

Credit validation

The drying facility for the each of the student dwellings is to be a drying line within all the en-suite

bathrooms within the development. A data sheet has been provided which is included within the

specifications. It will be screw fixed into the shower of each en-suite. Each airer drying area equates to 4.2

meters. It is confirmed in an email that these areas are mechanically ventilated. The M&E specification by

WYG in section U10 stated that the bathrooms will be provided with radiator and with a ventilation rate of

3l/s as standard and 8l/s as boost.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from Architect to Assessor, dated 28th June 2010 (12561_E8_100628_BREEAM E8.msg)

2. Document, Laundry Company Limited, dated 28th June 2010

(12561_E8_100628_LeifheitTelegant70WallMountedClothesAirer.pdf)

3. M&E specification – WYG – 15th November 2010 (12561_E8_110221_A039443_UoL


4. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 3rd

April 2011 (12561_E8_110403_BREEAM E8 drying space.msg)





Transport

T1 Provision of public transport 2 of 2 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where 80% of the development is within 1000m (via a safe walking route) of a transport node

providing a service to a local centre, town, city or a major transport node.

Two credits where 80% of the development is within 500m (via a safe walking route) of a transport node

providing a service to a local centre, town, city or a major transport node.

Credit validation

A map has been provided which locates the bus stops around the region of the halls of residence. The list

of services and their frequencies have been provided as the following:

139 – every 30 mins

74/75 – 15 mins

75A – 15 mins

76 – 30mins

77 – 30 mins

80 – 15 mins

80A &180 – 15mins

86&86D – 5 mins

86A&86B – 5mins

86C – 10mins

N86 – 5mins

107/207 – 20mins/30mins

201- 1hr 30mins

699 – 5 mins

801 – 1hr 30mins

A further map is provided by the architect highlighting a bus stop in city centre, which is within 500m via

safe pedestrian route from the entrance of the buildings. It is stated that buses 86/86A use this bus stops. A

timetable for this service is provided confirming there is a frequency of at least 15 minutes, between 7:30am

to 10pm.

2 credits awarded.



Credit references

1. Email from Project Manager to Assessor, dated 19th March 2010 (12561_T1_100215_Chatham St

Residencies BREEAM response.msg)

2. Email from Project Manager to Assessor, dated 8th April 2010 (12561_T1_100408_Residences

BREEAM - Transport.msg)

3. Document – Bus stop locations, dated 13th April 2010 (12561_T1_100413_New Eco-Residence

Public Transport Map.doc)

4. Email from Project Manager to Assessor, dated 13th April 2010 (12561_T1_100413_Residences

BREEAM - Transport.msg)

5. Timetable 86 (12561_T1_110403_86A Liverpool - Liverpool John Lennon Airport (from 19

September 2010).pdf)

6. Map showing busstop for 86 (12561_T1_110403_Walking distance to major bus stop.pdf)

7. Email – Stride Treglown ltd – 3rd

April 2011 (12561_T1_110403_BREEAM T1 distance to transport

nodes.msg)



T2 Proximity to key amenities 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where the site is within 500m of the following amenities:

a. Post box

b. Grocery shop.

Credit validation

The architect has provided an OS map highlighting the locations of grocery shop and post office. A scaled

Google map is also provided marking the two.

It can be confirmed that both key amenities are located within 500m of the building entrance via safe

pedestrian routes.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from Architect to Assessor – 21st February 2011 (12561_T2_110221_T3 information.msg)

2. Document – Map showing distance to Grocery Shop and Post Office - 21st February 2011

(12561_T2_110221_Travel distance to Grocery and Post Box.pdf)



3. Document – Map showing distance to Grocery Shop and Post Box – Stride Treglown Ltd – 26th

May 2011 (12561_T2_110526_P010_Location of Local amenities.pdf)

4. Email from Architect – 26th May 2011 (12561_T2_110526_T3 information.msg)


No further information required

T3 Proximity to other amenities 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where the site is within 1000m of at least 5 of the following amenities:

a. Postal facility b. Grocery shop (only qualifies where more than 500m from the site) c. Bank/cash point d. Pharmacy e. Doctors surgery/medical centre f. Community centre g. Leisure centre h. Outdoor open access public area i. Place of worship

j. Public house

Credit validation

The development has a range of amenities situated nearby. An OS map and Google maps indicating the

directions are provided to show that there is a safe walking route to each of the following:

a. Postal facility is within 500m and hence does not qualify for this credit.

b. The grocery shop is within 500m and hence does not qualify for this credit.

c. Cash point – 0.3miles (483m)

d. Pharmacy – 0.1miles (161m)

e. Doctors Surgery – 456ft (139m)

f. Community Centre – n/a

g. Leisure Centre – 0.7miles (1127m)

h. Park – 0.2miles (322m)

i. Place of Worship – 0.3miles (483m)

j. Public House – 0.3miles (483m)

Over five of the required facilities are within 1000m via safe pedestrian routes.



Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from Architect to Assessor – 21st February 2011 (12561_T2_110221_T3 information.msg)

2. Document – Map showing distance to amenities - 21st February 2011 (12561_T2_110221_Travel

distance to Grocery and Post Box.pdf)

3. Email from Architect – 26th May 2011 (12561_T2_110526_T3 information.msg)



T4 Maximum car parking capacity 2 of 2 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence is provided to demonstrate that the number of parking spaces provided for the

building has been limited.

Credit validation

Confirmation has been received that no parking is to be provided for this development except for the

disabled spaces on Myrtle Street.

A site wide car park document is provided confirming that no parking is provided for students other than

those who are registered as having disability.

2 credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from architect to Assessor, dated 28th June 2010 (12561_T4_100628_BREEAM T4.msg)

2. Drawing 40072_LL(90)001 Rev B, Stride Treglown Limited, dated 31st March 2010

(12561_T4_100628_40072_LL(90)001_B_Landscape Masterplan.pdf)

3. Email from architect dated 3rd

April 2011 (12561_T4_110403_BREEAM T4 car parking.msg)

4. Car park management plan – University of Liverpool – (12561_T4_110403_NW90031 - Car park

management 080709.pdf)





T5 Cycle / wheelchair / electric buggy store


Credit criteria

One credit where evidence is provided to demonstrate that there is adequate provision of:

a. Covered, secure and well lit cycle racks for staff & residents.

b. Secure storage for wheelchairs and electric buggies.

Credit validation


Credit references

None



T6 Pedestrian & cyclist safety 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that;

a. safe pedestrian routes to the local amenities are provided b. the site layout has been designed to minimise risks to pedestrians and cyclists.

Credit validation


Credit references

None





T7 Travel plan 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence is provided to demonstrate that a travel plan has been developed and tailored to

the specific needs of the users of the assessed development..

Credit validation

A travel plan has been developed as part of the feasibility and design stages.

The travel plan is structured to meet the needs of the particular site and takes into consideration the

findings of a site specific transport assessment that covers:

a. Current local environment for walkers and cyclists, and specific provision of disabled persons

b. Public transport links serving the site

c. Current facilities for cyclists

The plan demonstrates how and what measures will be taken to minimise the impact of traffic as a result of

the new development. A number of initiatives have been suggested under each of the transportation types.

The findings of the travel plan have been used to steer the design of the development in order to meet the

travel plan objectives.

• Encouragement of walking

• Communication of the travel plan and education of it

• Provision of further cyclist facilities for the campus and refurbishment of existing cycle storage

facilities

• Access Improvements such as dropped kerbs, resurfacing and the widening of access points when

required

• Pedestrian and cycles route to be created at Russell Street/Bronte Street to allow more direct

access between the University and the City Centre.

• Further research and studies for the local public transport to see if improvements can be made

• Signage for car parking and cycle storage to aid location and access

The travel plan has addressed all types of travel including staff/commuter journeys, residents, visitors, and

deliveries.

The travel plan includes a package of measures that address constraints for walking cycling, public

transport, cars and motorbikes, reducing the need to travel, visitors and deliveries.

Confirmation has been received that no new car parking spaces are to be provided in conjunction with the

new development (at worst mitigating the losses).



The email from the architect dated July 2011 confirmed that the scheme design has responded to the

objectives of the Travel Plan in the following manner:

• No car parking has been allowed for except for disabled use

• Secure and covered cycle parking has been included

• The scheme includes a refectory allowing a large proportion of residents to eat within the

residences without having to travel.

• Walking is encouraged with the provision of a new pedestrian crossing on Myrtle Street and direct,

well illuminated links into the existing campus.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from Project Manager (University of Liverpool) to Assessor, dated 11th February 2010

(12561_T7_100211_Chatham St Residencies BREEAM.msg)

2. Document, Car Park Management, JMP Consultants Ltd, 8th July 2009

(12561_T7_100211_NW90031 - Car park management 080709.pdf)

3. Document, Transport Assessment, JMP Consultants Ltd, 8th July 2009

(12561_T7_100211_NW90031 - Transport Assessment 090709.pdf)

4. Document, Travel Plan Report, JMP Consultants Ltd, 8th July 2009 (12561_T7_100211_NW90031

- Travel Plan Report 080709.pdf)

5. Email from Architect to Assessor, dated 28th June 2010 (12561_T7_100628_BREEAM T7.msg)

6. Email from Architect to assessor, dated 12th July 2011 (12561_T7_110712_T7.msg)





Water

W1 Water consumption 3 of 4 credits achieved

Credit criteria

Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that WCs are designed to minimise the consumption of

potable water.

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that taps and showers are designed to minimise the

consumption of potable water.

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that other sanitary facilities are designed to minimise the

consumption of potable water.

Credit validation

First credit

The email from the architect stated that Opella Concealed cistern with 6/4 ltr flush & delayed action flush

valve throughout have been specified.

Another email from the architect confirmed that instructions on the appropriate operation of the flushing

devices will be provided on the cistern.

First credit achieved.

Second credit is not being sought.

Third credit

The email from the architect and specifications stated that the following has been specified:

• Vitra minimax aerated basin mixer tap throughout

• Hans Grohe shower head limited to 9 litres per minute throughout

No baths are specified.

It is confirmed by the architect in the email that the shower flow rate stated above is at 1.5 bar pressure.

Third credit awarded.

Fourth credit:

It is confirmed that baths and urinals are not provided. In a previous query TMRQ972, it was stated by the

BRE that in the scenario where no baths are to be installed: the small baths compliance can be achieved by

default provided that criteria for 3.2 (showers have a nominal flow rate the same as or less than 9 litres per

minute at 1.5 bar pressure) has been met.

The washer/dryer was not specified as low water at the design stage.



The laundry provided uses Eco feature, which uses extremely less water and is therefore in line with the

aim of the credit. Manufacturer’s literature is provided to confirm this.

Thus at least two items comply with the credit requirement.

Fourth credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email between BRE and assessor, dated 24th February 2010 (12561_W1_100224_FW

TMRQ1067 - Multires 2008 Wat 1 innovation credit.msg)

2. Water load and rain water calculations (12561_W1_110221_Domestic Loads Rev C.xls)

3. Email – Stride Treglown ltd – 3rd

April 2011 (12561_W1_110403_BREEAM W1 Water

consumption.msg)

4. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 26th May 2011 (12561_W1_110526_Chatham Street E7 E8 W1 MW2

MW8 MW9.msg)

5. Email – BRE – TMRQ972 – (12561_W1_100120_TMRQ972 Multi-residential 2006 W1.msg)

6. Email – Stride Treglown ltd – 26th March 2012 (12561_W1_120326_BREEAM W1 Water

consumption.msg)

7. Laundry info – manufacturer (12561_W1_110317_laundry info.pdf)

8. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 28th March 2012 (12561_W1_120328_BREEAM W1 Water

consumption)

9. Shower head specification – Stride Treglown Ltd (12561_W1_120328_Shower head spec.pdf)



W2 Water recycling 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where information provided demonstrates the specification of systems that collect, store, and

where necessary, treat rainwater or greywater for WC and urinal flushing purposes.

Credit validation

The drawing provided indicates that the rainwater will be harvested from a roof area of 3510m2. Information

relating to ‘Stormsaver’ has been provided. This is a rainwater recovery system. Information and

calculations have been provided in relation to the sizing of the tank required for 50% of the rainwater over

the defined period of collection.

West Block contains 330 WCs. Calculations show that a 15,000 litre tank will collect 63% of the volume of

rainfall over the period of collection.



East Block contains 390 WCs. Calculations show that a 15,000 litre tank will collect 51% of the volume of

rainfall over the period of collection.

The M&E specification R11 by WYG stated that systems as described above will be installed in the

courtyard of each block.

A further confirmation from the architect stated that Drawings S 502 & 503 detail the location of the tanks.

The collected water is to be used for flushing WCs.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from architect to assessor, dated 28th June 2010 (12561_W2_100628_BREEAM W2.msg)

2. Drawing – SK159, W2 Rainwater Harvesting Areas, Stride Treglown Limited, dated 28th June 2010

(12561_W2_100628_45050_SK159_BREEAM W2 Roof plans.pdf)

3. Email form Mechanical Engineer to Assessor, dated 25th August 2009

(12561_W2_090825_University of Liverpool quote.msg)

4. Document from White Young Green, dated 25th August 2009 (12561_W2_090825_1005330QN03 -

WYG.pdf)

5. Document, Domestic Loads, Rev C, White Young Green, dated August 2009

(12561_W2_090803_Domestic Loads Rev C.xls)

6. M&E specification – WYG – 15th November 2010 (12561_W2_110221_A039443_UoL


7. Email – Stride Treglown – 6th June 2011 (12561_W2_110606_BREEAM M&E - Copy.msg)

8. BREEAM confirmation document – Stride Treglown Ltd – 6th June 2011

(12561_W2_110606_A039443 UoL BREEAM 02_06_11.pdf)

9. Drawing – WYG (12561_W2_110606_A039443_(52) S 503_G.pdf)

10. Drawing 2 – WYG (12561_W2_110606_A039443_52_S_502_J.pdf)



W3 Water Meter 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where information provided demonstrates that a water meter with a pulsed output will be

installed on the mains supply to each building.



Credit validation

The BREEAM report provided by WYG stated that a water meter will be provided on the mains water

supply to the building and pulsed output is provided to enable future connection to the BEMS for the

monitoring of water consumption.

The M&E specification S10 confirmed that pulsed rated water meters are specified to the site boundary and

the mains water supply to the buildings.

Drawing ME_101 has been provided showing the location of the water meter.

Credit awarded.

Credit references



(12561_W3_110606_A039443 UoL BREEAM 02_06_11.pdf)



4. BREEAM report – WYG – 21st February 2011 (12561_W3_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)

5. Drawing – WYG (12561_W3_110606_A039443_27_ME_101.pdf)



W4 Major Leak Detection 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a leak detection system is specified or installed.

Credit validation

The M&E specification S10 confirmed that pulsed rated water meters are specified to the site boundary and

the mains water supply to the buildings. The meters shall be monitored by BMS for water consumption and

water leakage.

The specification confirmed that the leak detection system is:

a. Audible when activated;

b. Activated when a continuous flow of water passes through the water meter at a flow rate above a pre-set

minimum for a pre-set period of time;

c. Able to identify different leakage rates, e.g. continuous, high and/or low level leaks, over set time periods;

d. Programmable to suit the owner/occupiers’ requirements; and



e. Where applicable, designed to avoid false alarms caused by normal operation of large water consuming

plant such as chillers.

The system shall not cut off the water supply when the alarm is triggered.

Drawing ME_101 has been provided showing the location of both the water meters.

Credit awarded.

Credit references



(12561_W4_110606_A039443 UoL BREEAM 02_06_11.pdf)



4. BREEAM report – WYG – 21st February 2011 (12561_W4_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)

5. Drawing – WYG (12561_W4_110606_A039443_27_ME_101.pdf)



W5 External Potable Water Use 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that low-water irrigation systems are specified/installed,

or where planting and landscaping is irrigated via rainwater or reclaimed water.

Credit validation

The email from the architect confirmed that there is no irrigation system to be included in the scheme and

that planting is to be watered manually where at all.

Credit references


April 2011 (12561_W5_110403_BREEAM W5 External potable

water use.msg)





Materials

MW1 Materials specification – major building elements


Credit criteria

Up to 7 Credits are awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that the major building elements

specified have an ‘A rating’, as defined in the Green Guide to Housing Specification.

Credit validation

A table has been provided by the architects, confirming material specification, green guide ratings and

areas.

A number of queries were sent to the BRE, where the rating could not match the Green guide to

specification.

The table is as below:

Element Green

guide

rate &

code

Specification Element

Number

Area of

Element

External

walls

Total: 10061.5

m2

A+

Brickwork, cement mortar, cement-bonded

particle board sheathing, insulation, light steel

frame, vapour control layer, plasterboard on

battens, paint

806470537 9000 m2

(A)

Standing seam zinc sheets plywood

sheathing, breather membrane, PIR foam

board insulation, aluminium support brackets

and rails on primary steel frame. Internal leaf

of cement board on SFS with 2 layers of

15mm plasterboard, skim plaster and paint.

TBC 1061.5m2

Windows

Total: 4341.5

m2

B Powder coated aluminium window

(profile < 0.88 kg/m), double glazed

813100001 1174.5m2

C

Extruded aluminium stick type curtain wall:

1 transom per floor, laminated sealed glass

unit, coated aluminium spandrel panell with

pentane blown PUR/PIR insulation

806510649 2100m2

B

Extruded aluminium stick type curtain wall: 1

transom per floor, laminated sealed glass unit,

glue bonded insulation, medium dense

concrete solid blockwork, plasterboard on

806510001

1067m2



dabs, paint

Roof

Total: 3385 m2

C

In situ reinforced concrete, oxidised polyester

reinforced bitumen roofing membranes,

insulation, paving slabs

BMI 3977-3

1070m2

B

In situ reinforced concrete, oxidised

polyester reinforced bitumen roofing

membranes, insulation, rounded pebbles

BMI 3977-4

1070 m2

B

In situ reinforced concrete, hot melt rubberised

bitumen waterproofing layer, insulation, green roof

build-up

BMI 3978-1 400m2

(A)

In situ reinforced concrete, hot melt rubberised

bitumen waterproofing layer, insulation, brown

roof build-up

TBC 600m2

A+

Standing seam zinc sheets plywood sheathing,

breather membrane, PIR foam board insulation,

timber joists

BMI3978-4 245m2

Upper floors

Total: 16026

m2

D

Power floated in situ reinforced

concrete floor slab

807280054

16026m2

Ground floor

Total: 3344 m2

C

Screeded in situ concrete slab, over

insulation on polyethylene dpm laid on

blinded recycled aggregate sub-base

820100029

220m2

D

Screed on insulation laid on in situ concrete on

polyethylene dpm laid on blinded recycled

aggregate sub-base

868m2

820100048 868m2

B

Powerfloated in situ concrete slab, over

insulation on polyethylene dpm laid on blinded

recycled aggregate sub-base

820100201 2256m2

Internal Walls

Total:

24559m2

A Galvanised steel stud, plasterboard, paint

809760002

7,231m2

(A) Acoustic separating walls TBC 16431m2

B Lightweight solid blockwork with plaster, paint

809180020

450m2

A Lightweight solid blockwork, painted finish

809180039

449m2

Floor

finishes

Total:

22551m2

B Ceramic floor tiles 120m2

821580001 120m2

C

Carpet - polyamide cut, tufted, 1000 g/m², textile

backing. Recycled Rubber Crumb Underlay 3000

g/m². FCSS 23/32.

821570072

11,465m2



A Homogeneous polyvinyl chloride floor coverings

(EN649). FCSS 23/32.

821570065

5,851m2

B

Polyvinyl chloride floor coverings with

enhanced slip resistance (Safety Flooring)

(EN 13845).

921570010

3,228m2

2 credits available.

Credit references

1. Material pro-forma – Stride Treglown Ltd – (12561_MW1_proforma sent to BRE)

2. Ratings – BRE – (12561_MW1_BRE ratings)

3. Architects specification table – (12561_MW1_110412_MW1_Materials table_2006.pdf)


MW2 Hard landscaping and boundary protection


Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of the combined area of external hard

landscaping and boundary protection specifications achieve an A rating, as defined by the Green Guide to

Specification.

Credit validation

The following table has been provided by the landscape architect confirming the areas, specifications and

green guide ratings of the hard landscaping and boundary protection.

Element

Green

guide rate

Specification

Area of

Element

Boundary Protection B Galvanised steel railings 44 m2

Hard Landscaping

C Asphalt paving – parking bays 191 m2

A Stone paving slabs 4353 m2

B Gravel areas 658 m2

It is stated that the green guide of the time is relevant i.e. ‘The Green Guide to Specification 3rd edition’

hardback, which they have based the proposals on.



It can be confirmed that at least 80% of the total hard landscaping and boundary protection areas is A

rated. The landscape drawings are included in the LE section.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 28th March 2012 (12561_MW2_120328_MW2 credit chatham st spec

table.msg)

2. Specification table – Stride Treglown Ltd – 28th March 2012

(12561_MW2_120328_MW2_table_2006.doc)



MW3 Reuse of Building Facade 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where at least 50% of the total façade (by area) is reused and at least 80% of the reused façade

(by mass) comprises in-situ reused material.

Credit validation


Credit references

None



MW4 Re-use of building structure 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a design reuses at least 80% of an existing primary

structure and for part refurbishment and part new build, the volume of the reused structure comprises at

least 50% of the final structure’s volume.

Credit validation




Credit references

None



MW5 Recycled aggregates 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that significant use of crushed aggregate, crushed

masonry or alternative aggregates (manufactured from recycled materials) are specified for ‘high grade’

aggregate uses (such as the building structure, ground slabs, roads, etc.).

Credit validation


Credit references

None



MW6 Responsible sourcing of materials: Basic Building Elements


Credit criteria

Credits are awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that Basic Building Elements are responsibly

sourced.

Credit validation


Credit references

None





MW7 Responsible sourcing of materials: Finishing elements


Credit criteria

Credits are awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that Finishing elements are responsibly

sourced.

Credit validation


Credit references

None



MW8 Designing for robustness 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that protection is given to vulnerable parts of the building such as areas exposed to high pedestrian traffic, vehicular and trolley movements.

Credit validation

The email from the architect confirmed that the West Block of the project will operate as student residential

accommodation during term time and conference accommodation during student holidays. This means that

the building management will be servicing the rooms in a similar manner to serviced apartments for the

conference accommodation i.e. housemaid trolleys, linen trolleys etc. The East Block will only ever operate

as student accommodation.

It has been confirmed that all internal plasterboard walls within residential areas, have been rated as severe

duty (as per BS5234-2). Protection rails are therefore not mandatory.

The clusters that incorporate wheelchair user bedrooms will include stainless corner guards as added

impact protection.

Kick plates have been specified for all doors, accessible rooms and living in clusters. Accessible rooms will

also incorporate mid-rail places to prevent damage from wheelchair users. Accessible bedrooms and

kitchen/living rooms will incorporate wall corner protection.

Internal walls to non-residential areas will consist of blockwork walls with painted plaster finish to office

areas. There will be a paint finish directly onto blockwork for plant and service areas. Internal doors to

service areas will be steel doors. All timber internal doors to incorporate kick plates. Plant external doors

will also be steel doors, with all other external doors to be powder coated aluminium.



The email from the architect stated that the entrance matting in the entrance lobbies is a robust carpet strip

fitted into an aluminium bladed carrier frame, Gradus Esplanade Plus with Boulevard 6000 secondary

carpet. The communal corridors, bedrooms, offices etc. then have a Desso Neo carpet tile floor finish. The

details of the types of flooring have been provided.

Landscape drawings have been provided confirming that no delivery areas within 2m or car parking areas

within 1m of an external wall are specified. The drawings are provided indicating the following as addition

measures for robustness:

• Protective bollards at vulnerable locations and controlled access

• 100mm up-stand kerbs to planting beds which are min 1m wide on building edges and corners.

Thus the criterion for robustness has been satisfied.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from architect to assessor, dated 29th June 2010 (12561_MW8_100629_BREEAM MW8

confirmation 2.msg)

2. Drawing – SK160 Rev A, Stride Treglown Limited, dated 29th June 2010

(12561_MW8_100629_45050_SK160_A_BREEAM MW8 Ground floor plan.pdf)

3. Drawing – SK161, Stride Treglown Limited, dated 29th June 2010

(12561_MW8_100629_45050_SK161_BREEAM MW8 Typical upper floor plan.pdf)

4. Landscape drawings – Stride Treglown Limited – 18th April 2011

(12561_MW8_110418_bollards_40072_dwgs 001_H 001_C 200_B 201_A.pdf)

5. Email – Stride Treglown Limited – 18th April 2011 (12561_MW8_110418_Chatham St Breeam

credit assessment MW2 MW8 LE4 LE5 LE6.msg)

6. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 26th May 2011 (12561_MW8_110526_Chatham Street E7 E8 W1

MW2 MW8 MW9.msg)

7. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 12th March 2012 (12561_MW8_120312_BREEAM Chatham Street

MW8.msg)

8. Manufacturer’s details – flooring 1 (12561_MW8_120312_6000 Boulevard Information.pdf)

9. Manufacturer’s details – flooring 2 (12561_MW8_120312_Esplanade Plus - Matting NBS & Gradus

Specification.doc)

10. Manufacturer’s details – flooring 3 (12561_MW8_120312_esplanade-plus-12mm-closed-

construct.pdf)

11. Manufacturer’s details – flooring 4 (12561_MW8_120312_Neo_combined.pdf)





MW9 Storage of recyclable waste 1 of 2 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where storage space is provided for recyclable household waste in the flats/bedsits.

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a central, dedicated storage space is provided for

materials that can be recycled. This can be either within the building itself, or on site using skips, (provided

there is good access for collections and it is within easy reach of the building).

Credit validation

First Credit:

The email from the architect confirmed that 3 no of recycling bins are specified in addition to the general

waste bin.

The plans for all kitchen types are provided by the architect. The sizes of the recycling bins are shown in

the table on the drawing. It can be confirmed that a total capacity of 35l has been specified for the recycling

bins, in addition to the 30l general waste bins.

A further drawing showing typical elevation for the kitchens has been provided, which confirmed that the 3

recycling bins are provided under the counter. Thus even though they are free standing, they are not stand

alone.

In response to the query 14848, the BRE stated that Bins should be a fixture of the dwelling rather than a

fitting which can be easily extracted by moving tenants. Although not necessary as evidence, assessors

should check whether one of the following criteria applies to the bins before awarding credits:

- The bins are screwed down and thus annexed to the building

- Removal of the bins would cause damage to the fabric of the property (screws being pulled out etc)

- The bins have been included on any itinerary pertinent to the dwelling as a fixture.

In a letter the University has confirmed that when operational the flat clusters and study bedrooms will have

an inventory, which will include recycling and waste bins.

Thus the third option has been complied with.

Credit awarded.

Second credit is not being sought.

Credit references

1. Drawings – Stride Treglown Ltd (12561_MW9_110403_Kitchen drawings)

2. Drawing – Kitchen elevation – Stride Treglown Ltd (12561_MW9_110718_45050_AL(7-)004

Typical Kitchen Layout Elevations.pdf)


April 2011 (12561_MW9_110403_BREEAM MW9.msg)



4. Email - Stride Treglown Ltd – 18th July 2011

(12561_MW9_110718_45050_110718_Breeam_Waste and Recycling_MW9.msg)

5. Email – BRE – 8th September 2011 (12561_MW9_110908_BREEAM Enquiry (14848) 2 - 2006 - -

MW9 (Storage of Recyclable Waste) .msg)

6. Letter – University of Liverpool – 6th February 2012 (12561_MW9_120210_Scan-to-Me from

138.253.164.35 2012-02-06 162529.pdf)



Land Use and Ecology

LE1 Re use of land 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the footprint of the proposed development largely

falls within the boundary of land previously developed.

Credit validation

Historical maps have been provided for the site. An extract of the report indicating the historical

development on site is provided.

It is clear from information provided that the site has been used as Residential housing, chapel and college

occupied site, all cleared and site now currently car park in last 50 years.

The site layout plans have been provided to confirm the areas before/after the development. It was clear

from the existing site plan that the previously developed hard standing area was 77%. The proposed

building and hard standing is 8114sq.m, which is 84.5%. From the drawings and area calculations, it is

apparent that at least 75% of the proposed building and hard standing is on the previously developed

building and hard standing.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Extract report (12561_LE1_110221_Extract from Site Investigation report Summary of land

use.pdf)

2. Historical site maps (12561_LE1_110221_Historical site maps.pdf)

3. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 21st February 2011 (12561_LE1_110221_LE1 credit

information.msg)

4. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 26th March 2012 (12561_LE_120326_Chatham st ecology.msg)



5. Existing site plan – Stride Treglown ltd – 26th March 2012

(12561_LE_120326_40072_LL(90)416_Existing Areas.pdf)

6. Proposed site plan – Stride Treglown ltd – 26th march 2012

(12561_LE_120326_40072_LL(90)417_Proposed Areas.pdf)



LE2 Contaminated land 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the land used for the new development has, prior to

development, been defined as contaminated, and where adequate remedial steps have been taken to

decontaminate the site prior to construction.

Credit validation

An extract of the land investigation report has been provided, which confirmed that part of the site (where

east block is located was contaminated as Lead hot spot was found.

The report includes a drawing, which indicated that this hot spot was relocated in the courtyard (green area)

of the east block before development.

A full site investigation report has been provided. The report in section 8 stated that the risk assessment

methodologies employed by CC GEOTECHNICAL LTD are based on use of CLEA 1.04 and are detailed in

Appendix M.

The report suggested that although there is risk to human beings, there is not remediation required. Certain

actions are suggested in terms of landscaping to avoid any risk.

Credit withheld.

Credit references

1. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 8th March 2011 (12561_LE2_110308_BREEAM - Contamination

credit.msg)

2. Extract of the report (12561_LE2_110308_contaminated land information.pdf)

3. Email – Ocon – 14th march 2011 (12561_LE2_110314_Ocon BREEAM Credits Confirmation M1

M2 M3 E6 LE2.msg)

4. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 26th march 2012 (12561_LE2_120326_BREEAM - Contamination

credit .msg)

5. Site investigation report – CC Geotechnical Ltd – February 2009 (12561_LE2_120326_5242

Report.pdf)





LE3 Ecological value of land and protection of ecological features


Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the construction zone is defined as land of low

ecological value and all existing features of ecological value will be fully protected from damage during site

preparation and construction works.

Credit validation

The site is identified as having no potential for supporting any legally protected species other than nesting

birds and there are no habitats of priority conversation interest on site. However, the construction zone

includes numerous mature tree specimens, some or all of which will be lost.

Consequently, the land cannot be defined as of low ecological value.

Credit withheld.

Credit references

1. Email from architect to design team, dated 15th February 2010 (12561_LE3_100215_Chatham St

Residencies BREEAM response 3.msg)

2. Report – Eco-BREEAM report, White Young Green, dated March 2009 (12561_LE3_100215_eco-

BREEAM report - issue 1.pdf)

3. Email (a) from Ecologist to Assessor, dated 10th November 2010 (12561_LE3_101109_Existing site

tree a.msg)

4. Email (c) from Ecologist to Assessor, dated 10th November 2010 (12561_LE3_101109_Existing

site tree c.msg)

5. Drawing 40072_LL(90)101 Rev A, Stride Treglown Limited, dated March 2010

(12561_LE3_101109_Existing tree.jpg)





LE4 Mitigating ecological impact 2 of 2 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the change in ecological value of the site, as a

result of development, is less than zero and equal to, or greater than, minus nine species, i.e. a small

negative change.

Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no negative change in the ecological value

of the site as a result of development, i.e. equal to, or greater than, zero species.

Credit validation

WYG are appointed as suitably qualified ecologist for the site. The ecology report provided by WYG

confirmed that the report was based on a walkover survey and Phase 1 habitat survey carried out prior to

any construction activity on site. The report is prepared by Hazel Robson and Rachel Kerr.

It is stated that Rachel Kerr is a full member of IEEM and with degrees in Environmental science and

Environment Management. She has four years experience in the same field and thus qualifies as a SQE.

Details of the vegetation plot types and their areas before and after the development have been provided. A

document from Stride Treglown ltd confirmed that the areas in the ecologist’s reports are superseded due

to updated design and the plan to include additional species for the green roof.

The assessor has calculated an increase of 6.73 species in LE4 and LE5 calculator tool.

2 credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Email – Stride Treglown Management - dated 19th November 2010 (12561_LE4_101109_Existing

site tree a.msg)



3. Document – Chatham Street Plant Schedule and Budget, Rev A, June 2010

(12561_LE4_110418_Plant schedule_revA.pdf)

4. Drawing – Phase 1 Habitat Map (12561_LE4_110606_BREEAM existing areas sketch.pdf)

5. Email – Ocon Group – 26th April 2011 (12561_LE_110426_BREEAM credit LE6.msg)

6. Photo – Site Strip and Soil Storage – November 2010 (12561_LE_110426_Site strip and soil

storage November 2010.pdf)

7. Photo – Site Strip– November 2010 (12561_LE_110426_Site strip November 2010a.pdf)

8. Email – White Young Green Ecologist – 7th November 2011 (12561_LE_111107_LE5 credits.msg)

9. Landscape plan – screen wall – Stride Treglown Ltd – (12561_LE_111222_LA(90)412_Rev

A_Screen Detail.pdf)



10. Landscape plan – Ground floor – Stride Treglown Ltd – 22nd

December 2011

(12561_LE_111222_LL(90)200_Rev E_Planting plan ground floor.pdf)

11. Landscape plan – Roof plan – Stride Treglown Ltd – 22nd

December 2011

(12561_LE_120203_LL(90)201_B_Planting plan - roof.pdf)


13. Report – Ecology report – August 2010 (12561_LE_120326_EcoBREEAM Report Final Issue

3.pdf)

14. Confirmation of revised areas – Stride Treglown Ltd – 27th March 2012

(12561_LE_120327_SKMBT_C28012041910580.pdf)



LE5 Enhancing site ecology 3 of 3 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit is available where evidence provided demonstrates that the design team (or client) has

appointed a professional to advise on enhancing and protecting the ecological value of the site; and

implemented the recommendations for general enhancement of site ecology.

Two credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates a positive increase in the ecological value

of the site of up to (but not including) 6 species.

Three credits where evidence provided demonstrates a positive increase in the ecological value of the site

of 6 or more species.

Credit validation






The ecology report confirmed that recommendations are provided for protection and enhancement of the

site ecology. Inclusion of green roof, brown roof and bird boxes are recommended to comply with LBAP. It

is stated that any tree removal should take place outside the bird nesting season. The landscape plans and

email from the contractor confirm the compliance with these recommendations.

The email from the architect confirmed that the general recommendations of the ecology report will be

implemented.



Details of the vegetation plot types and their areas before and after the development have been provided. A

document from Stride Treglown ltd confirmed that the areas in the ecologist’s reports are superseded due

to updated design and the plan to include additional species for the green roof.

The assessor has calculated an increase of 6.73 species in LE4 and LE5 calculator tool.

3 credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 26th March 2010 (12561_LE5_100326_UoL BREEAM credits.msg)

2. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 26th May 2011 (12561_LE5_110526_Chatham Street MW9 and

LE5.msg)


(12561_LE_101109_Existing tree.jpg)

4. Email – Ocon Group – 26th April 2011 (12561_LE_110426_BREEAM credit LE6.msg)

5. Photo – Site Strip and Soil Storage – November 2010 (12561_LE_110426_Site strip and soil

storage November 2010.pdf)

6. Photo – Site Strip– November 2010 (12561_LE_110426_Site strip November 2010a.pdf)

7. Drawing – Phase 1 Habitat Map (12561_LE_110606_BREEAM existing areas sketch.pdf)




December 2011



December 2011




3.pdf)

13. Confirmation of revised areas – Stride Treglown Ltd – 27th March 2012

(12561_LE_120327_SKMBT_C28012041910580.pdf)





LE6 Long term impact on biodiversity 2 of 2 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the client has committed to implementing some

measures to minimise any negative long term impact on biodiversity.

Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the client has committed to implementing

significant measures to minimise any negative long term impact on biodiversity..

Credit validation

Mandatory requirements:






All relevant UK and EU legislation relating to protection and enhancement of ecology is to be complied with

during the design and construction process. Specific reference has also been made to the bird nesting

season due to the plans to remove trees from the site. The email from the contractor has been provided

along with site photographs to demonstrate that the site clearance took place outside the bird nesting

season. Thus the recommendation of the SQE was complied with.

A five year management plan has been provided and address:

• Management of any protected features on site

• Management of any new, existing or enhance habitats,

• A reference to the current or future site level Biodiversity Action Plan

The management plan provided in the annex of the report details a commitment to provide information for

the building occupants. Upon completion, the report is to be a practical guide and provide a basis for the

following:

• Scope of the management plan

• Key responsibilities and with whom these responsibilities lay e.g. owner, landlord, occupier, FM etc.

Mandatory requirements have been complied with.

Additional requirements:

Four additional requirements have been noted within the management plan and supporting information has

been provided as below:

1. The email from Ocon confirmed that their QSHE Manager Ian Muir has been appointed as the

‘BIODIVERSITY CHAMPION’. Ian carries out Ocon’s toolbox talks for Health & Safety and for the

Environmental issues.



Item 1 has been achieved.

2. The email from Ocon confirmed that their QSHE Manager Ian Muir carries out Ocon’s toolbox talks

for Health & Safety and for the Environmental issues. An example log sheet for the same has been

provided in the annex F of the management plan.


3. A log sheet to be used by the Biodiversity champion to record actions to protect the biodiversity and

monitor their effectiveness is provided in Annex G of the management plan. Evidence is not

received to confirm compliance with the requirement.

Item 3 has been withheld.

4. It is stated that the habitats listed in North Merseyside Biodiversity Action Plan are best suited to

comply with UKBAP and LBAP. It is also stated that the green and brown roof specified for the

development will increase the biodiversity in line with the LBAP. The landscape plans provided

confirm the inclusion of green and brown roofs. In additional bird boxes were also specified.


5. The recommendations were made to reduce the disturbance to wildlife. It was stated that site

clearance etc. should take place outside the bird nesting season. The site photograph and email

confirmed that it was complied with.


Thus at least four additional requirements have been complied with.

2 credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Email (a) from Ecologist to Assessor, dated 10th November 2010 (12561_LE6_101109_Existing site

tree a.msg)




December 2011



December 2011





3.pdf)

7. Drawing – Phase 1 Habitat Map (12561_LE4_110606_BREEAM existing areas sketch.pdf)


March 2012 (12561_LE_120323_Chatham st vine court

BREEAM.msg)




10. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 26th May 2011 (12561_LE5_110526_Chatham Street MW9 and

LE5.msg)



Pollution

P1 Refrigerant GWP – Building services 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates the use of refrigerants with a global warming potential

(GWP) of less that 5 or where there are no refrigerants specified for use in building services.

Credit validation

The air conditioning unit specifies uses R410A refrigerant.

Credit not achievable.

Credit references

None



P2 Preventing refrigerant leaks 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that refrigerant leaks can be detected AND that the

provision of automatic refrigerant pump down is made to a heat exchanger (or dedicated storage tanks)

with isolation valves, or where there are no refrigerants specified for the development.

Credit validation

Technical information has been provided on the manufacturer for the air conditioning units. The data was

sent to the BRE for clarification. As per the BRE’s response to the query and the information provided by

the design team, it is clear that an automatic refrigerant leak detection system is specified, which is not

based on the principle of detecting the concentration in air.



Is confirmed in the literature that the refrigerant volume of the complete system is calculated from the

following data:

• outdoor temperature

• reference system temperatures

• reference pressure temperatures

• refrigerant density

• types and number of indoor units

When activating the refrigerant containment check, the unit switches into cooling mode and duplicates

certain reference conditions based on memory data. The result indicates whether or not refrigerant leakage

has occurred.

A BREEAM additional information document stated that Leakage is detected at each condenser i.e. each

circuit which is monitored for pressure and refrigerant content. Alarms are raised and are connected to a

dedicated head end and the BMS for remote monitoring.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email from Mechanical Engineer to Assessor, dated 12th February 2010

(12561_P2_100212_Chatham St Residencies BREEAM - Refrigerant Leak Info (1).msg)

2. Email (2) from Mechanical Engineer to Assessor, dated 12th February 2010

(12561_P2_100212_Chatham St Residencies BREEAM - Refrigerant Leak Info.msg)

3. Document – Daikin Air Conditioning Technical Information (12561_P2_100212_UKEPCEN07-200-

VRVIII_tcm46-89428.pdf)

4. Document – VRF System Description (12561_P2_100212_VRF Description.doc)

5. Email between BRE and Assessor, dated 10th March 2010 (12561_P2_100310_TMRQ1072 -

Multires Pol 2.msg)

6. BREEAM document – Stride Treglown Ltd – 2nd

June 2011 (12561_P2_110606_A039443 UoL


7. Email – BRE query TMRQ 1072/21656 – (12561_P2_120307_BREEAM Enquiry (21656) 2 Multi

Res 2008 POL2.msg)

8. Email – WYG – 30th March 2012 (12561_P2_120330_chatham st M1.msg)





P3 Insulant GWP 0 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the specification of insulating materials avoids the

use of substances with a global warming potential (GWP) of 5 or more in either manufacture or

composition.

Credit validation

Credit not sought

Credit references

Credit not sought



P4 NOx emissions of heating source 0 of 3 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the maximum dry NOx emissions from delivered space heating energy are ≤100 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).

Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the maximum dry NOx emissions from delivered space heating energy are ≤70 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).

Three credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the maximum dry NOx emissions from delivered space heating energy are ≤40 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).

Credit validation

The BREEAM confirmation document from Stride Treglown ltd stated that only a small portion of heating is

through gas, as the main heating source is VRF system.

Credit is not achievable.

Credit references

1. BREEAM document – Stride Treglown Ltd – 2nd

June 2011 (12561_P4_110606_A039443 UoL


2. BREEAM report – WYG – 21st February 2011 (12561_P4_110221_BREEAM 2006 Report.doc)





P5 Minimising Flood risk 2 of 3 credits achieved

Credit criteria

Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development is located in a zone

defined as having a low annual probability of flooding.

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development is located in a zone

defined as having a medium annual probability of flooding and the ground level of the building, car parking

and access is above the design flood level for the site’s location.

One further credit is available where evidence provided demonstrates that Sustainable Urban Drainage

techniques are specified to minimise the risk of localised flooding, resulting from a loss of flood storage on

site through development.

Credit validation

The BREEAM information document from Stride Treglown Ltd stated that there was no requirement for a

flood risk assessment to be carried out for the site.

A copy of Environment Agency’s map has been provided, which confirmed that the site is situated in a low

flood risk zone, from sources such as rivers and sea.

Another copy of flood map assessed by WYG confirmed the above.

The ground water vulnerability assessment map provided by WYG confirmed that the site is highly

permeable.

2 Credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 11th March 2011 (12561_P5_110311_BREEAM P5.msg)

2. Environment Agency map – (12561_P5_110311_P5 Flood and Groundwater maps.pdf)

3. Flood assessment map – river and sea – WYG (12561_P5_110311_P5 Flood map.pdf)

4. Ground vulnerability map – WYG (12561_P5_110311_P5 Groundwater vulnerability map.pdf)

5. BREEAM information document – Stride Treglown Ltd – 6th June 2011

(12561_P5_110606_A039443 UoL BREEAM 02_06_11.pdf)





P6 Minimising water course pollution 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that on site treatment such as oil separators/interceptors

or filtration have been specified for areas at risk from pollution, i.e. vehicle manoeuvring areas, car parks,

waste disposal facilities, delivery facilities or plant areas.

Credit validation

The BREEAM information document from Stride Treglown Ltd stated that there is no petrol interception for

the scheme as there is no car parking or high risk areas.

Credit awarded.

Credit references

1. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 6th June 2011 (12561_P6_110606_BREEAM M&E.msg)

2. BREEAM information document – Stride Treglown Ltd – 6th June 2011

(12561_P6_110606_A039443 UoL BREEAM 02_06_11.pdf)



P7 Renewable & low emission energy 3 of 3 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a feasibility study considering renewable and low

emission energy has been carried out and the results implemented.

Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the first credit has been achieved and 10% of total

energy demand for the building/development is supplied from local renewable, or low emission energy,

sources.

Three credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the first credit has been achieved and 15% of

total energy demand for the building/development is supplied from local renewable, or low emission

energy, sources.

Credit validation

A sustainability and energy statement has been produced by White Young Green. It confirms that the

feasibility study has been carried out at RIBA Stage C (outline proposals).

This document evaluates a number of options for renewable energy sources that could be used for the

project. The study covers:

a. Payback



b. Land use

c. Local Planning requirements

d. Noise

e. Whole life costing

f. Available grants

g. Appropriateness of the available technologies

h. Reasons for excluding technologies

Ground source heat pumps, solar hot water heating and rainwater recovery have all been suggested as

renewables to aid offset of carbon and provide the reduction of energy required for the project.

A copy of part L report, along with SBEM model and EPC certificates have been provided. The study was

carried out using IES software, whose primary author was Lisa Collins. Her qualifications and CV are

provided. Lisa has now left WYG and any revisions (i.e. current BRUKL and EPC) are revised by Steve

Gallacher, who also has left WYG. An email from WYG confirmed that Steve’s professional qualifications

include GradEI and GradCIBSE.

A further email from WYG confirmed that ASHP and solar hot water systems have been specified and

these are used in the calculations as stated above.

The following calculation results are also provided by WYG:

Renewable Energy Generation (MWh) Total Energy Demand

%

R.E.

ASHP Solar Thermal Panel (MWh)

West 316 24 664 51

East 324 30 826 43

Thus total energy demand for both the blocks is 1490MWh of which 694MWh is being provided using the

renewable. Thus 46.5% of the energy demand is being met by the use of renewable.

M&E specifications T62, S10, S11 and R11 provide details of the renewable used.

3 credits awarded.

Credit references

1. Document, Energy and Sustainability Statement, White Young Green, dated July 2009

(12561_P7_090803_Energy & Sustainability Statement.doc)



2. Document, Domestic Loads, Rev C, White Young Green, dated August 2009

(12561_P7_090803_Domestic Loads Rev C.xls)

3. Email – WYG – 21st February 2011 (12561_P7_110221_Additional M&E BREEAM info -2.msg)


5. Part L report and SBEM – WYG (12561_P7_110221_SBEM info Chatham Street Part L Summary

(complete).pdf)

6. Email – Stride Treglown Ltd – 6th June 2011 (12561_P7_110606_BREEAM M&E.msg)

7. CV – Lisa Collins – WYG (12561_P7_110606_Lisa Collins CV.pdf)

8. Email – WYG – 15th November 2011 (12561_P7_111115_Chatham Street - BREEAM -

Outstanding D&P information.msg)

9. Email – WYG – 25th February 2012 (12561_P7_120225_Chatham st additional information

required.msg)



P8 Reduction of night time light pollution 1 of 1 credits achieved

Credit criteria

One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the external lighting design is in compliance with the

guidance in the Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) Guidance notes for the reduction of obtrusive light,

2005.

Credit validation

The BREEAM report provided by WYG confirmed the following:

• All external lighting design will be designed in compliance with Table 1 of the ILE Guidance Notes

for the Reduction of Obtrusive Light, 2005.

• All external lighting (except for safety and security lighting) will be designed to be automatically

switched off between 23.00 and 07.00.

• Safety or security lighting system will be designed to comply with the lower levels of lighting

recommended during these hours in Table 1 of the ILE’s Guidance notes.

• Illuminated advertisements will be designed in compliance with ILE Technical Report 5.

All of the above is confirmed in the M&E specification V41, provided by WYG.

Credit awarded.



Credit references


2. M&E specification – WYG – 15th November 2010 (12561_P8_110221_A039443_UoL




Appendix A Score Spreadsheet


BREEAM Rating:

Overall Credit Allocation Env Weighting

Percentage

section credits

achieved

Overall

Weighted

Percentage

Management 15% 84.62% 12.7% Unclassified <25

Health & Wellbeing 15% 69.32% 10.4% Pass ≥25 - <40

Energy 81.51% Good ≥40 - <55

Transport 77.78% Very Good ≥55 - <70

Energy & Transport 25% 80.29% 20.1% Excellent ≥70

Water 5% 87.50% 4.4%

Materials 10% 26.32% 2.6%

Land Use & Ecology 15% 80.00% 12.0%

Pollution 15% 57.14% 8.6%

Totals 70.74%

ExcellentVine Court Halls of Residences, Uni of Liverpool

BREEAM Rating

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Management Health & Wellbeing

Energy & Transport

Water Materials Land Use & Ecology

Pollution

% a

vailab

le/a

ch

ieved

BREEAM Multi-Residential Section

Overall Assessment Performance Credits Available

Credits Achieved

12561_D&P_120331_MULTI_RES_2006_Tool_Rev02.xls 1


Ref Title Wh

ole

Bu

ild

ing

/

Sit

e

Self

Co

nta

ined

Fla

ts

Ind

ivid

ual

Bed

roo

ms

Kit

ch

en

& C

ate

rin

g

Are

as

Gen

era

l

Co

mm

un

al

Are

as

Off

ices

Meeti

ng

Ro

om

s

Leis

ure

Are

as

Healt

h A

reas

Lau

nd

ry

Oth

er

Sp

aces

Credits

available

13038 681 7878 876 2873 171 164 0 0 27 368

Management

M1 Commissioning 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

M2 Considerate Constructors 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

M3 Construction Site Impacts 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

M4 Stakeholder Consultation 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

M5 Building User Guide 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

M6 Security 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Credits Available 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13

Enter the area (m2) of each function into the cells below each function name

Vine Court Halls of Residences, University of

Liverpool


Credits Achieved 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

% Function Score 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85%

% Total Score 4% 51% 6% 19% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2%

Section Score 85%

Health and Wellbeing

HW1 Daylighting N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 1

HW2 View Out N/A 1 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1

HW3 Glare Control N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1

HW4 High Frequency Lighting N/A 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1

HW5Internal & External Lighting

LevelsN/A N/A 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1

HW6Potential For Natural

VentilationN/A 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 N/A 1 1

HW7 Internal Air Pollution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

HW8 Ventilation Rates N/A 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1

HW9 Thermal Zoning N/A 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1

12561_D&P_120331_MULTI_RES_2006_Tool_Rev02.xls 512561_D&P_120331_MULTI_RES_2006_Tool_Rev02.xls 5

HW10 Microbial Contamination 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

HW11 Sound Insulation N/A 3 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4

HW12 Home Office 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

HW13 Outdoor Space 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1



% Function Score 71% 69% 70% 70% 58% 64% 20% 22% 75% 78%

% Total Score 4% 42% 5% 15% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2%

Section Score 69%

E1a Dwelling Emission Rate N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15

E1b Reduction of CO2 Emissions 12 N/A 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 15

E2 Building Fabric N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2

E3Submetering of Substantial

Energy Uses1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

E4 Internal Luminaires N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1

Energy


E4 Internal Luminaires N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1

E5 External Luminaires 1 N/A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

E6Provision of Ecolabelled

Fridges/Freezers1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

E7Provision of Energy Saving

Laundry Equipment1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

E8 Drying Space 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1



% Function Score 18% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85%

% Total Score 1% 51% 6% 19% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2%

Section Score 82%

Transport Credits

T1 Provision of Public Transport 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

T2 Proximity to Key Amenities 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

T3 Proximity to Other Amenities 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1


T4Maximum Car Parking

Capacity2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

T5Cycle / Electric Buggy /

Wheelchair Storage0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

T6 Pedestrian & Cyclist Safety 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

T7 Travel Plan 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1



% Function Score 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78%

% Total Score 4% 47% 5% 17% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2%

Section Score 78%

Combined Energy & Transport section scores



% Function Score 35% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83%

% Total Score 2% 50% 6% 18% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2%


Section Score 80%

Water Credits

W1 Water Consumption 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4

W2 Water Recycling 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

W3 Water Meter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

W4 Major Leak Detecttion 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

W5 External Water Use 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1



% Function Score 88% 88% 88% 88% 88% 88% 88% 88% 88% 88%

% Total Score 5% 53% 6% 19% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2%

Section Score 88%

Materials & Waste Credits

MW1Materials Specification - Major

Building Elements2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 7


MW2Hard Landscaping & Boundary

Protection1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

MW3 Reuse of Building Façade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MW4 Reuse of Building Structure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MW5 Recyled Aggregates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MW6

Responsible Sourcing of

Materials - Basic Building

Elements

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

MW7Responsible Sourcing of

Materials - Finishing Elements0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

MW8 Designing for Robustness 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

MW9 Storage of Recyclable Waste 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2



% Function Score 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26%

% Total Score 1.4% 15.9% 1.8% 5.8% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.7%

Section Score 26%

Land Use and Ecology Credits

LE1 Reuse of Land 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1


LE1 Reuse of Land 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

LE2 Contaminated Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

LE3

Ecological Value of Land &

Protection of Ecological

Features

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

LE4 Mitigating Ecological Impact 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

LE5 Enhancing Site Ecology 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

LUE7Long Term Impact on

Biodiversity2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2



% Function Score 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80%

% Total Score 4% 48% 5% 18% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2%

Section Score 80%

Pollution Credits

P1Refrigerant GWP - Building

Services0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

P2 Preventing Refrigerant Leaks 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

P3 Insulant GWP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1


P4NOx Emissions of Heating

Source(s)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

P5 Minimising Flood Risk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3

P6Minimising Watercourse

Pollution1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

P7Renewable & Low Emission

Energy3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

P8Reduction of Night Time Light

Pollution1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1



% Function Score 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57%

% Total Score 3% 35% 4% 13% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2%

Section Score 57%

12561_D&P_120331_MULTI_RES_2006_Tool_Rev02.xls 512561_D&P_120331_MULTI_RES_2006_Tool_Rev02.xls 512561_D&P_120331_MULTI_RES_2006_Tool_Rev02.xls 5


M2: Considerate Constructors

Considerate Constructors (or alternative) Scheme

Please select the scheme being used to

demonstrate compliance

Note: if data is entered for both schemes, credits will be awarded only for the above selection.

i) Considerate Constructors Scheme

Score

achieved

1 Considerate Section 4.5

2 Environmentally Aware Section 4

3 Site Cleanliness Section 4.5

4 Good Neighbour Section 4.5

Ami Pandit ST-BESEC-ADC01-8

Vine Court Halls of Residences, Uni of Liverpool

If the Considerate Contructors Scheme is being used, enter the scores achieved or required

below (from Checklist A1):

Considerate Constructors Scheme

4 Good Neighbour Section 4.5

5 Respectful Section 4.5

6 Safe Section 4.5

7 Responsible Section 4.5

8 Accountable Section 4.5

TOTAL Considerate Constructors Score 35.5

Credits Achieved 2

ii) Alternative Scheme

Credits Achieved 0

If an alternative independently assessed scheme is being used, enter the number of credits

achieved (from Checklist A2):

M2 Considerate Constructors 12561_D&P_120331_MULTI_RES_2006_Tool_Rev02.xls


M3: Construction Site Impacts

1CO2 emissions / energy consumption resulting

from energy use on site

2CO2 emissions / energy consumption resulting

from transport to and from site

3 Construction waste resulting from site activities

4Recycling of construction waste resulting from

site activities

5 Water consumption resulting from site activities



Where established best practice is specified to minimise the risks of:

Where a firm commitment is made requiring the constructor to set up systems to set

targets, monitor and report on the following impacts at site level:

Achieved

Not Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

6 Pollution to air arising from site operations

7Pollution to ground and watercourses / municipal

systems.

Points Achieved = 6

4Credits Achieved

Where 75% of timber used for temporary site uses is

certified by one of the schemes detailed in credit MW6 &

MW7.

Sustainably sourced site timber

Where established best practice is specified to minimise the risks of:

Achieved

Not Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

Ami Pandit ST-BESEC-ADC01-8Vine Court Halls of Residences, Uni of Liverpool

E1b: Reduction of CO2 emissions - New Buildings

63.80

45.90

16.40

46.24%

12

Notional bulding emissions rate

BREEAM Multi-Residential 2006 - Assessment Calculators

Credits Achieved

Percentage Improvement over Building Regs.

Building CO2 Emission Rate (BER)

Target CO2 Emission Rate (TER)


MW1: Materials Specification - Major Building Elements

Green Guide to Specification

Description of Elements

Area (m²)Area that is 'A'

rated (m²)Mid 'A' factor

Potential

Ecopoints

Achieved

Ecopoints

'A' material

External Walls 2 types 10061.50 10061.50 0.885 8904.43 8,904.43

Roof 5 types 3385.00 845.00 1.08 3655.80 912.60

Upper floor Slab 1 type 16026.00 0.00 1.36 21795.36 0.00

Windows 3 types 4341.50 0.00 0.71 3082.47 0.00

Internal Walls 4 types 24559.00 24111.00 0.42 10314.78 10,126.62

SUM 47752.83 19943.65

Assessed/Target 0.42

Credits using the Green Guide 2

Ami Pandit

ST-BESEC-ADC01-8


Description of Elements

Area (m²)Area that is 'A'

rated (m²)Mid 'A' factor

Potential

Ecopoints

Achieved

Ecopoints

'A' material

Floor Finishes / Covering 4 type of floor finishes 22551.00 5851.00 0.717 16169.07 4,195.17

Assessed/Target 0.26

Credits using the Green Guide 0

2.00Total Credit for MW1

MW1 Green Guide Calcs. 12561_D&P_120331_MULTI_RES_2006_Tool_Rev02.xls


Ecology Calculator 2

Plot/Habitat type

Area BEFORE

development

(m2)

Total No. of

Species

Area AFTER

development

(m2)

Total No. of

Species

building and hardlandscaping 7474.00 0.00 8963.00 0.00

garden planting 1324.00 31.00 636.00 31.00

green/brown roofing 1900.00 0.00 1900.00 57.00

amenity grassland 801.00 12.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL SITE AREA:



Instructions: This calculator is used to calculate LE4: Mitigating ecological impact and LE5: Enhancing site ecology, where a

'suitably qualified ecologist' has been appointed and is able to provide more site-specific ecological data with regard to plot

types and number of floral species.

1149911499TOTAL SITE AREA:

ECOLOGICAL VALUE (AREA WEIGHTED NO. PLANT SPECIES)

TOTAL CHANGE IN PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY: 6.73

LE4 Credits Achieved 2

LE5 Credits Achieved 3

11499

11.13

11499

4.41

LE4 & LE5 Ecology Calculator 2 12561_D&P_120331_MULTI_RES_2006_Tool_Rev02.xls

stridetreglown.co.uk

Bristol Promenade House The Promenade Clifton Down Bristol BS8 3NE T: 0117 974 3271 F: 0117 974 5207 Bath St George’s Lodge 33 Oldfield Road Bath, BA2 3NE T: 01225 466 173 F: 01225 428 492 Cardiff Treglown Court, Dowlais Road, Cardiff CF24 5LQ T: 029 2043 5660 F: 029 2047 0422 London 3 Cosser Street London SE1 7BU T: 020 7401 0700 F: 020 7401 0701

Manchester Commercial Wharf 6 Commercial Street Manchester M15 4PZ T: 0161 832 9460 F: 0161 839 0424 Plymouth Norbury Court The Millfields Plymouth PL1 3LL T: 01752 202088 F: 01752 202089 Reading University of Reading Building L044, London Road, Reading, RG1 5AQ T: 01872 241300 F: 01872 275560 Truro 55 Lemon Street Truro TR1 2PE T: 01872 241300 F: 01872 275560

Abu Dhabi AS Business Centre Al Ain Road Umm Al Nar PO Box 129865 Abu Dhabi UAE T: 00 971 (0) 2 510 2416

Documents

VINE COURT HALLS OF RESIDENCES DESIGN STAGE REPORT · 2020. 9. 2. · stride treglown job no. 12561 prepared by ami pandit checked by fleur baguley date 30th march 2012 file 12561_r0_120330_final