View
222
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Vijay Kanabar, Tanya Zlateva, Lou Chitkushev, Leo Burstein (MET)
Innovative Instructional Practices in Design, Implementation and Execution of Blended Programs
Center of Excellence and Innovation in Teaching ConferenceMarch 25, 2011
MET Educational MissionAcademic
RigorLatest Industry Technologies & Best Practices
Flexible Delivery Formats:distance (ca. 1,800 students),
blended, weekends, intensive, intermission, international
+ +
Innovation—MET’s Distinctive Strength:Capture & Teach trends in enduring intellectual context
BU Brand Responsiveness to Student and Industry Needs= +
Ensure student’s long-term success by linking academic knowledge with practical skills and competencies critical in the modern
workplace.
© Boston University Metropolitan College 2March 2011
Blended Learning
Represents a pre-determined balance of some classroom and continuous online education
Improves the quality of teaching through ongoing engagement and interaction
Promotes student success by focusing on active learning that is immediately applicable to professional skills and everyday life.
Stra
tegi
c
March 2011 © Boston University Metropolitan College
Live component in distance classes: bridging the distance between online students and faculty
eLive: Blended courses with reduced face to face time supplemented with online materials and live sessions
International programs: India, Mexico, Spain
Blended Learning at MET—the Need
© Boston University Metropolitan College 4March 2011
Bringing renowned academics and professionals in small interdisciplinary programs: Gastronomy
Promoting our programs and facultyEnriching the traditional classroom and
online learning experience.
Blended Learning at MET—the Need
© Boston University Metropolitan College 5March 2011
Early Adoption: Graduate Computer Science Certificate for Keane, Inc., 2000
Current Status:
MS CIS Program Graduate Certificates:
– Digital Forensics– IT Project Management– Gastronomy– E-Commerce
Faculty Spotlights International Programs
Office of Educational Technologies, 2007
Blended Learning at MET—Experience
© Boston University Metropolitan College 6March 2011
The Rise of Blended LearningMET identified blended learning as a strategic priority for future growth in order to protect and enhance our enrollments, and to create a practical option to extend our reach and pursue specific opportunities, both regional and international.
8March 2011 © Boston University Metropolitan College
Reaching Beyond
the Distance
• The promise of blended learning is to bring together the best from traditional on-campus and distance education models.
• We need to design a format that will combine “southern hospitality and northern efficiency”.
• Need to consider pedagogical, technological, and organizational aspects.
© Boston University Metropolitan College 9March 2011
StructureCourse materials, well defined activities, schedules, etc.
Dialogf2f sessions, online discussions, video collaboration
Impact
Answer is an area and depends on student’s independent learning ability
Moore’s TD TheoryMaintain optimal “transactional distance” using both structure (CMS-supported) and dialog (both async and sync communications).
0
© Boston University Metropolitan College 10
F2F
DE
Getting It Done: Instruments for Building an Effective Blended Program
March 2011
Impl
emen
tatio
n
Getting It Done: Instruments for Building an Effective Blended Program
StructureCourse materials, well defined activities, schedules, etc.
Dialogf2f sessions, online discussions, video collaboration
Impact
Answer is an area and depends on student’s independent learning ability
Moore’s TD TheoryMaintain optimal “transactional distance” using both structure (CMS-supported) and dialog (both async and sync communications).
0
© Boston University Metropolitan College 11
F2F
DE
March 2011
vv vv → On-campusDistance ←
Four face-to-face classroom sessions....
1. Were sufficient2. Were too few3. Were too many
45%5%
50%
“The blended format is great and is so convenient for working professionals. Please keep offering blended format courses.”
“Everything is perfect for me now in this class.”
“Overall great format and would recommend the course in its blended format to others.”
“I specifically took this class because of the format. I knew I was going to have an unpredictable schedule this spring”
“Well it definitely solved the time constraint problem for me after doing full time job. I like the blended session but at the same time I wish it could have had 2 more classroom sessions.”
“The online video and recording are great.”
“I like the fact that the course is spread out and was able to take time in my busy schedule. Also the interaction with the instructor was a tremendous help.”
“I enjoyed the ability to meet the instructor in person. I think that forms a better relationship between student and instructor.”
For me, this material is not intuitive and Iwould prefer to take this class in a face to face environment.
“Its the best of both, having the ability to have a fully functional online course and get to meet the professor”
Student Feedback
Structure: organized content & activities (CMS/ID) Dialog: Keep students engaged, maintain a learning
energy conduit, transcend distance
and time with “Blended Classroom” – a combination of synchronous
and asynchronous capabilities:
1. Video collaboration (distance)2. Classroom and personal multimedia recording (time)3. Virtual laboratories for real practical learning (tech)
Embracing Technological Innovations
}
© Boston University Metropolitan College 13March 2011
Online
Enabling Synergies
© Boston University Metropolitan College 15March 2011
Rich Structured Content
Live In-lass Recordings
On-CampusBlended
eLive
Execution: Tools & TechniquesTechniquesOur experience – 4 sessions to 8 sessions of 3 hour classes.The offline teaching is done with tools within the LMS, customized tools.- Wimba, Relay and MET-MEET.- Live teaching is done with Echo recordings.
Exec
ution
March 2011 © Boston University Metropolitan College
Recording and Delivery
• Full/partial lectures recorded in real time:– In a classroom setting– Online lectures and meetings
© Boston University Metropolitan College 18March 2011
• Tutorials, homework reviews recorded offline• Choice of technologies and cost controls
– Automation of encoding/publishing is the key– Faculty self reliance (“appliances”) and support– Licensing models and adoption strategies
Away from Campus--Relay
• Lecture capture• Creating supplemental materials• Enhanced distance learning• Delivering video feedback• Recording meetings• Creating training videos
STUDENT
• Free tools– Leverage trial versions– 30 days - 90 days
• DropBox• Microsoft Connect• BaseCamp
Microsoft Groove
• Microsoft Office Groove 2007 designed for collaboration with members who are regularly off-line.
• Very Powerful• Microsoft SharePoint Workspace • SharePoint Workspace 2010 is available with
Office Professional Plus 2010
Challenges & SolutionsSchedules
Missed Classes International StudentsPrerequisite Material
Challenging Topics
Advanced Content
Faculty Time Constraints
Virtual Office Hours
Collaborative Work
Business model
Commute
Virtual environments
Career Goals
Hands-on Skills
Community
Reduced residency
Extended (eLive) Classroom
Recorded lectures
Multimedia tutorials
Friendly technologies and supportFaculty Self Reliance
Continuous Online
Student Presentations
Everyday Practical
Summary• Blended learning takes advantage of online
technologies, but simple use of online technologies does not make a program blended
• Blended learning describes instruction in terms of outcomes – not the number of hours a student spends each week in classes
• Blended approach enables synergies between on-campus and online programs, and helps faculty to create a rich learning environment that all students enjoy
© Boston University Metropolitan CollegeMarch 2011 29
Summary
• Ensuring that appropriate content is covered in the correct format.– Discussions, Online tutorials (videos) and
Labs can be done away from regular class.– In class material teaching difficult content,
“cracking the ice” should be done in face to face class.
– Exam, Team Project Presentations – In Class
March 2011 © Boston University Metropolitan College