9
Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth International Conference on Information, Communications & Signal Processing Fourth IEEE Pacific-Rim Conference On Multimedia 15-18 December 2003, Meritus Mandarin Hotel, Singapore

Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression

P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata

Fourth International Conference on Information,  Communications & Signal Processing 

Fourth IEEE Pacific-Rim Conference On Multimedia 15-18 December 2003, Meritus Mandarin Hotel, Singapore

Page 2: Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

2Center for TeleInFrastructure

Video services over wireless networks are gaining more and more interest

Services are needed that convince customers to buy new equipment (3GPP)

3GPP networks support video services such as the IMS and the MBMS entities

Problem: Video services need much more bandwidth than voice calls, which makes them hard to sell

Video services

Page 3: Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

3Center for TeleInFrastructure

Serving Sara (560x304 pixels)

Page 4: Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

4Center for TeleInFrastructure

Motivation

Video services are transmitted over IP networks using the RTP/UDP/IP protocols

Video is encoded efficiently, but the protocol stack overhead is not

The protocol overhead comprises a large portion of the traffic (even more for small video formats as for the mobile phones)

Therefore: Compression of the protocol overhead needed

Page 5: Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

5Center for TeleInFrastructure

Methodology

Uncorrelated bit errors as recently found for UMTS channels

Simulated with and without ROHC implementation

O-Mode

Page 6: Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

6Center for TeleInFrastructure

ROHC Results

Page 7: Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

7Center for TeleInFrastructure

Insights

Protocol header compression can be achieved by using ROHC

Higher compression ratios for smaller video formats and higher quantizationLower fraction of packets comprised of actual

video data (i.e., payload)Lower error probability and state changes within

ROHC

Page 8: Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

8Center for TeleInFrastructure

ROHC Results

Page 9: Video Quality Evaluation for Wireless Transmission with Robust Header Compression P. Seeling and M. Reisslein and F.H.P. Fitzek and S. Hendrata Fourth

9Center for TeleInFrastructure

ROHC is an efficient header compression scheme for multimedia in wireless environments

Compression achieved depends on video format and video content

Utilization of ROHC for multimedia streaming does not introduce additional losses in terms of perceived video quality (PSNR)

Conclusion Video Measurements