Upload
poonam-sharma
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Vibrational dynamics of syndiotactic poly(1-butene)
Poonam Sharma, Poonam Tandon, V.D. Gupta *
Department of Physics, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
Received 10 August 1999; received in revised form 2 November 1999; accepted 26 January 2000
Abstract
The normal modes and their dispersions for form 1 of syndiotactic poly(1-butene) have been obtained using WilsonÕsGF matrix method as modi®ed by Higgs. Optically active frequencies corresponding to the zone center and zone
boundary are identi®ed and discussed. The Urey Bradley potential ®eld is obtained by least square ®tting of the ob-
served Fourier transform infrared absorption bands. Speci®c heat has been obtained from dispersion curves via density
of states. A comparative study of isotactic and syndiotactic forms of poly(1-butene) is presented. Ó 2000 Elsevier
Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Phonons; Dispersion curves; Density of states; Syndiotactic; Urey Bradley ®eld; Heat capacity
1. Introduction
Poly(1-butene) exists in two tactic forms, syndiotactic
and isotactic. Syndiotactic poly(1-butene) crystallizes in
two di�erent crystalline forms, namely form 1 and form
2 [1], whereas the isotactic form exists in three crystalline
forms. Form 1, obtained by cooling from the melt, has a
hexagonal unit cell containing six 3/1 helices; form 2 has
a tetragonal unit cell with four 11/3 helices, and form 3
has an orthorhombic unit cell having two 4/1 helices [2±
6]. Isotactic poly(1-butene) (iPB) is prepared by casting
from decalin, benzene, p-xylene, toluene or carbon tetra-
chloride. Di�erent forms were obtained by di�erent prep-
aration methods [7]. Syndiotactic poly(1-butene) (sPB) is
obtained by syndiospeci®c polymerization of 1-alkenes
in the presence of homogenous catalysts based on group
4A metallocene/methylalumoxane systems [8±12]. Both
the forms, form 1 and form 2 of sPB are characterized
by helical chain conformation of the TTGG kind. sPB
goes into s(2/1) helical conformation packed in an or-
thorhombic unit cell with a � 16:81 �A, b � 6:06 �A and
c � 7:73 �A [13]. A symmetry of the kind s(2/1)2 with a
chain repetition of 7.73 �A has been found for form 1
while form 2 has a (5/3) helical symmetry with a chain
repetition of 20.0 �A [1]. The crystal structure of form
2 has been presented by De Rosa and Scaldarolla
[14]. Form 1 is found to be thermodynamically stable,
whereas form 2 exists only under tension [1,14]. The
infrared spectra of form 1 of sPB cast from ®ve di�erent
solvents, chloroform, benzene, toluene, xylene and car-
bon tetrachloride reveal the same spectral pattern which
coincides with the spectrum of form 1 of sPB obtained
by cooling from the melt. These di�erent solvents pro-
duce the same structural form and hence the same
spectra [7].
Normal coordinate calculations and assignment for
various vibrational modes for form 1 of sPB based on
valence force ®eld of Holland-Moritz and Sansen [2]
have been reported earlier by Ishioka et al. [7]. However,
for full understanding of vibrational spectra, it is nec-
essary to know the dispersive nature of normal modes.
Such studies also provide information on the degree of
coupling and dependence of the frequency of a given
mode on the sequence length of the ordered conforma-
tion. These curves are also useful in calculating the
density of vibrational states which in turn can be used
for obtaining thermodynamic properties such as speci®c
heat, entropy, enthalpy and free energy.
European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638
* Corresponding author. Fax: +91-522-223405/+91-522-
223938.
E-mail address: [email protected] (V.D. Gupta).
0014-3057/00/$ - see front matter Ó 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S0 01 4 -3 05 7 (00 )0 0 04 9 -5
Recently, much work has been done on phonon
dispersion and heat capacity of a variety of polymeric
systems and the present authors have demonstrated its
potential in the full interpretation of the observed
spectra [15±17]. In continuation of this work, we report
here calculations of normal modes and their dispersion
within the ®rst Brillouin zone for form 1 of sPB. The
calculations are based on Urey Bradley force ®eld, which
in addition to valence force ®eld accounts for the intra-
unit nonbonded and tension terms. The density of states
obtained from dispersion curves is used to calculate the
heat capacity of sPB in the temperature range 50±500 K.
2. Theory
2.1. Calculation of normal mode frequencies
The calculation of normal mode frequencies has been
carried out according to WilsonÕs GF matrix method
[19±21] as modi®ed by Higgs [22] for an in®nite poly-
meric chain. In brief, the vibrational secular equation,
which gives the normal mode frequencies, has the form
jG�d�F �d� ÿ k�d�I j � 0; 0 6 d 6 p; �1�
where G is the inverse kinetic energy matrix, F is the
potential energy matrix and d is the vibrational phase
di�erence between the corresponding modes of adjacent
residue units.
The vibrational frequencies mi(d) (in cmÿ1) are related
to the eigenvalues ki(d) by the following relation:
ki�d� � 4p2c2m2i �d�: �2�
A plot of mi(d) versus d gives the dispersion curve for
the i-th mode.
2.2. Calculation of heat capacity
Dispersion curves can be used to calculate the heat
capacity of a polymeric system. For a one-dimensional
system, the density-of-state function or the frequency
distribution function is calculated from the relation
g�m� �X
j
�dmj=dd�ÿ1jmj�d��m: �3�
The sum is over all branches j. Considering a solid as
an assembly of harmonic oscillators, the frequency dis-
tribution g(m) is equivalent to a partition function.
The constant volume heat capacity Cv can be calcu-
lated using DebyeÕs relation
Cv �X
j
g�mj�kNA�hmj=kT �2 exp�hmj=kT ��exp�hmj=kT � ÿ 1�2 �4�
with
Zg�mj�dmj � 1: �5�
3. Results and discussion
A chemical repeat unit of sPB is shown in Fig. 1. sPB
has 24 atoms in a two residue repeat unit which give rise
to 72 dispersion curves. The frequencies of vibrations
have been calculated for phase values ranging from 0 to
p at an interval of 0.05p. The calculated frequencies at
d � 0 and d � p are optically active. Initially, approxi-
mate force constants were transferred from isotactic
poly(4-methyl,1-pentene) (PMP) [18]. These force con-
stants are then modi®ed to obtain the ``best'' ®t between
the calculated frequencies at d � 0 and d � p and the
peaks observed in the recorded FTIR spectra. The ®nal
force constants along with the internal coordinate are
given in Table 1. Since all the modes above 1350 cmÿ1
are nondispersive in nature, the dispersion curves are
plotted only for the modes below 1350 cmÿ1. The lowest
two branches of the dispersion curves correspond to the
four acoustic modes (m � 0 at d � 0 and d � p). Out of
these, three are due to the translation (one parallel and
two perpendicular to the chain axis) and one due to
rotation around the chain. For the sake of simplicity, the
modes are discussed under three separate sections viz
backbone, side chain and mixed modes.
3.1. Backbone modes
Modes involving the motion of the skeletal atoms are
termed as backbone modes. These modes along with
their assignments at both d � 0 and d � p are given in
Table 2. The calculated frequencies at 2920, 2915, 2912
and 2909 cmÿ1 having a mixed contribution of asym-
metric stretches of methylene and methine bond stretch
are assigned to the peak observed at 2918 cmÿ1 in the
FTIR spectra (Fig. 2). The width of this peak and its
asymmetric nature justi®es the assignment. The sym-
metric stretch of methylene group calculated at 2861
cmÿ1 corresponds to the observed frequency at 2866
Fig. 1. One chemical repeat unit of spoly(1-butene).
2630 P. Sharma et al. / European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638
cmÿ1. The CH2 scissoring modes calculated at 1467 and
1463 cmÿ1 correspond to the observed peak at 1463
cmÿ1. Our assignments are supported by the fact that
these modes are observed in a similar range in iPMP and
other synthetic polymers. Being highly localized, all
these modes are nondispersive.
3.2. Side chain modes
The side chain of sPB consists of a methyl and a
methylene group. Pure side chain modes and their as-
signments are given in Table 3. The infrared spectra of
sPB exhibit strong peaks at 2959 and 2874 cmÿ1 which
are assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric stretches
of methyl group calculated at 2963 and 2870 cmÿ1, re-
spectively. The calculated frequencies at 2911 and 2862
cmÿ1 which are due to the asymmetric and symmetric
stretch vibrations of the CH2 group correspond respec-
tively to the peaks observed at 2918 and 2866 cmÿ1.
These assignments are reported in a similar range in iPB
[4]. The asymmetric bending of CH3 calculated at 1463
cmÿ1 matches with the observed frequency at the same
value. The peak observed at 1463 cmÿ1 is also assigned
to the modes calculated at 1474 and 1454 cmÿ1 which
have a mixed contribution of the CH2 and CH3 scis-
soring modes. No other peak is observed around these
values and since the half-width at half-maximum is ap-
proximately 22 wave numbers, and in addition, it has an
asymmetric pro®le; hence, the 1463 cmÿ1 peak may
contain the peaks observed at 1474 and 1454 cmÿ1. The
second derivative of the spectra in this region is clearly in
support of it. Mixing of CH3 group bend and Cb±Cc±H
in opposite phases is observed in the mode calculated at
1390 cmÿ1 which corresponds to the observed peak at
1388 cmÿ1 in the IR spectra. These assignments are in
good agreement with the normal mode analysis reported
earlier by Ishioka et al. [7]. The peak observed at 781
cmÿ1 is assigned to the calculated frequencies at 778 and
773 cmÿ1. Both these modes are pure side chain modes
with mixed contributions of CH2 and CH3 rocking.
3.3. Mixed modes
The modes which involve the motion of back bone as
well as side chain atoms are termed as mixed modes. The
mode at 1312 cmÿ1 mainly involves the wagging of the
methylene groups present in both backbone (bb) and
side chain (sc) and is assigned to the peak observed at
1313 cmÿ1. The major contribution of the bb CH2
twisting is contained in the mode calculated at 1163 and
1095 cmÿ1. These modes are highly coupled with the side
chain vibrations and are assigned to the observed peaks
at 1161 and 1074 cmÿ1, respectively. The mode at 1123
cmÿ1 has a major contribution coming from the side
chain CH2 twisting and 20% contribution of CH bend-
ing. This mode is assigned to the observed peak at 1108
cmÿ1 and does not show much dispersion. The calcu-
lated frequency at 1027 cmÿ1 with major contributions
from CH3 and CH2 (side chain) rockings, matches well
with the observed frequency. The two methyl group
rocking from the two units which constitute a repeat
unit of sPB are calculated at 1008 and 997 and 965 and
960 cmÿ1. These are assigned to the peak appearing at
1000 cmÿ1 (Raman spectra) [6] and 972 cmÿ1 (IR spec-
tra). In the case of PMP [18], the corresponding fre-
quencies are calculated at 1007 and 986 cmÿ1. Another
mixed mode at frequency 935 cmÿ1 has contributions of
CH3 rocking and C±C stretches from both the main and
side chains. This is assigned to the observed peak at 924
cmÿ1. The modes calculated at 798 and 725 cmÿ1 are the
other two mixed modes assigned to the observed fre-
quencies at 807 and 725 cmÿ1. These modes show very
little dispersion.
Comparison of the observed frequencies at d � 0 for
syndiotactic and isotactic poly(1-butene) is shown in
Table 1
Internal coordinates and Urey Bradley force constants (md/�A)
Internal coordinates Force constants
m[Ce±H] 4.210
m[Ce±Ca] 3.220
m[Ca±H] 4.377
m[Ca±Cb] 2.860
m[Ca±Ce] 2.050
m[Cb±H] 4.210
m[Cb±Cc] 2.100
m[Cc±H] 4.140
s[Ca±Cb] 0.022
s[Cb±Cc] 0.007
s[Ce±Ca] 0.024
s[Ca±Ce1] 0.220
/[H±Ce±H] 0.414(0.31)
/[H±Ce±Ca] 0.4235(0.2)
/[Ca±Ce±Ca] 0.540(0.17)
/[Ca±Ce±H] 0.4235(0.2)
/[Ce±Ca±Ce1] 0.50(0.175)
/[Ce1±Ca±Cb] 0.50(0.175)
/[Cb±Ca±H] 0.372(0.20)
/[H±Ca±Ce] 0.414(0.20)
/[Ce±Ca±Cb] 0.54(0.175)
/[Ca±Cb±H] 0.4667(0.2)
/[H±Cb±Cc] 0.393(0.20)
/[Ca±Cb±Cc] 0.35(0.175)
/[H±Cb±H] 0.405(0.295)
/[Cb±Cc±H] 0.441(0.22)
/[H±Cc±H] 0.384(0.32)
/[H±Ca±Ce1] 0.345(0.20)
Note: m, /, x, s denote stretch, angle bend, wag and torsion,
respectively. Stretching force constants between the nonbonded
atoms in each angular triplet (gem con®guration) are given in
parentheses.
P. Sharma et al. / European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638 2631
Table 4. Except for a few, most of the bands observed in
the IR spectra appear in the same range for both the
tactic forms. The di�erence in the observed frequency
arises mainly because of the placement of the side
groups in di�erent lateral positions which in turn brings
about the change in interaction constants. It is these
constants which are responsible for the frequency shifts
in the two tactic forms. A greater change is expected in
the low frequency region, but because of the nonavail-
ability of the spectra below 700 cmÿ1, comparison is not
possible.
3.4. Dispersion curves
Dispersion curves provide information on the extent
and the degree of coupling. Dispersion curves also help
in the understanding of both the symmetry-dependent
and symmetry-independent spectral features. In general,
the IR absorption spectra and Raman spectra from
polymeric systems are complex and cannot be unraveled
without the full knowledge of the dispersion curves. The
regions of high density of states, which are observable in
the IR and Raman spectra under suitable conditions,
depend on the pro®le of the dispersion curves which play
an important role in the thermodynamical behavior of
the system. Mixed modes are the ones which show the
maximum dispersion. These modes are given in Table 5.
Zone center modes at 1335 and 1312 cmÿ1 have a con-
tribution from the CH2 wag present in the main and side
chains, respectively. On moving away from the zone
center, both the modes have an increasing contribution
from the main chain CH2 and have a tendency to bunch
near the zone boundary. The mode at 1295 cmÿ1, at
d � 0 has 29% and 18% contribution coming from CH2
wagging of the main and side chains. Besides this, it has
20% contribution from the C±C stretch of bb and 12%
from CH bending. This mode disperses to 1287 cmÿ1 at
d � p with 48% contribution coming from CH2 wagging
of side chain. In the mode calculated at 1163 cmÿ1 (at
d � 0), on further increase of d, the contribution of side
chain twisting becomes dominant at d � 0:9p. This
Table 2
Pure back bone modes
Frequency (cmÿ1) Assignments % PED at d � 0
Calculated Observed
2921 2918 m[Ca±H]�76� � m[Ce±H](20)
2920 2918 m[Ca±H]�50� � m[Ce±H](48)
2861 2866 m[Ce±H](95)
1467 1463 /[H±Ce±H]�75� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�9� � /[Ca±Ce±H](6)
1340 1353 /[Ca±Ce±H]�23� � m[Ce±Ca]�19� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�19� � m[Ca±Ce]�9� � m[Ca±Cb]�7� � /[H±Ca±Ce](5)
49 ± s[Ca±Ce1]�25� � s[Ce±Ca]�20� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�19� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�10� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�6� � /[Ce1±
Ca±Cb](5)
0 ± s[Ca±Ce1]�29� � s[Ce±Ca]�27� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�13� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�13� � /[H±Ce±H]�5� � /[Ca±Ce±
Ca](5)
0 ± /[Ca±Ce±H]�35� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�33� � /[H±Ce±H]�15� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca](14)
Assignments % PED at d � p
2921 2918 m[Ca±H]�59� � m[Ce±H](37)
2920 2918 m[Ca±H]�60� � m[Ce±H](39)
2861 2866 m[Ce±H]�94� � m[Cb±H](5)
1466 1463 /[H±Ce±H]�77� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�10� � /[Ca±Ce±H](6)
1336 1353 m[Ce±Ca]�27� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�24� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�16� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�9� � m[Ca±Ce](6)
47 ± s[Ce±Ca]�34� � s[Ca±Ce1]�15� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�10� � s[Ca±Cb]�8� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�7� � /[Ce1±Ca±
Cb]�7� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb](6)
0 ± s[Ca±Ce1]�29� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�17� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�15� � s[Ce±Ca]�12� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�10� � /[Ca±
Ce±Ca]�8� � /[H±Ce±H](5)
0 ± /[Ca±Ce±H]�35� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�33� � /[H±Ce±H]�15� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca](14)
Fig. 2. FTIR spectra of sPB (3000±700 cmÿ1).
2632 P. Sharma et al. / European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638
mode disperses by 14 wave numbers and tends to come
close to 1123 cmÿ1 wherein the contribution of the side
chain CH2 twisting decreases from 71% to 22% over the
full d range. At d � p, this mode with 41% contribution
from bb CH2 twist, appears at 1149 cmÿ1.
The mode at 1095 cmÿ1 is a highly mixed mode at
both the zone center and the zone boundary. At the zone
center, this mode has a mixed contribution of CH2 (bb)
twisting and CH bending but CH2 twisting (sc) starts
mixing with it as d progresses. On reaching the zone
boundary, it shows a dispersion of 16 wave numbers.
The mode calculated at 1020 cmÿ1 has the zone center
PED as CH3 rocking 24%, m(Ce±Ca) 20%, /(H±Ca±Ce)
14%, m(Ca±Cb) 7%. As the d value is increased, the
contribution of CH3 rocking increases and the mode
comes very close to the mode at 1011 cmÿ1 (at d � p)
which has dominant contribution from CH3 rocking.
Modes calculated at 1229, 884, 755, 489, 213 and 170
cmÿ1 are some other mixed modes which disperse by 15±
20 wave numbers and are shown in Figs. 3±6.
Table 3
Pure side chain modes
Frequency (cmÿ1) Assignments % PED at d � 0
Calculated Observed
2963 2959 m[Cc±H](99)
2963 2959 m[Cc±H](99)
2911 2918 m[Cb±H](94)
2870 2874 m[Cc±H]�94� � m[Cb±H](5)
2870 2874 m[Cc±H]�95� � m[Cb±H](5)
2869 2874 m[Cc±H](100)
2869 2874 m[Cc±H](100)
2862 2866 m[Cb±H]�90� � m[Cc±H](5)
1474 1463 /[H±Cc±H]�45� � /[H±Cb±H]�37� � /[Ca±Cb±H](7)
1474 1463 /[H±Cc±H]�47� � /[H±Cb±H]�37� � /[Ca±Cb±H](7)
1464 1463 /[H±Cc±H](93)
1454 1463 /[H±Cc±H]�47� � /[H±Cb±H]�40� � /[Ca±Cb±H](8)
1454 1463 /[H±Cc±H]�45� � /[H±Cb±H]�41� � /[Ca±Cb±H](7)
1390 1388 /[Cb±Cc±H]�49� � /[H±Cc±H]�45� � m[Cb±Cc](5)
1390 1388 /[Cb±Cc±H]�49� � /[H±Cc±H](45)
1276 1265 /[H±Cb±Cc]�35� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�31� � m[Ca±Cb]�10� � m[Cb±Cc](7)
997 1000 /[Cb±Cc±H]�50� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�11� � m[Ca±Cb]�9� � /[Cb±Ca±H]�7� � /[H±Ca±Ce1](5)
773 781 /[H±Cb±Cc]�23� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�20� � /[Cb±Cc±H]�11� � m[Cb±Cc]�10� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�6� � m[Ca±
Cb]�6� � m[Ca±Ce](5)
Table 4
Comparison of modes of sPB and iPB
Assignments Frequency (cmÿ1)
Syndiotactic Isotactic
CH3 asymmetric stretch 2959 2961, 2958
CH3 symmetric stretch 2874 2874
CH stretch 2918 2914
CH2 asymmetric stretch 2918 2914
CH2 symmetric stretch 2866 2851
CH3 scissoring 1463 1463, 1458
CH2 scissoring (backbone) 1463 1441
CH2 scissoring (side chain) 1463 1439
CH3 symmetric deformation 1388 1380
CH2 wagging (backbone) 1353, 1286 1342, 1302
CH2 twisting (backbone) 1163, 1074 1222, 1207
CH2 rocking (backbone) 883, 807 816, 798
CH2 wagging (side chain) 1313 1366, 1321
CH2 twisting (side chain) 1265, 1108 1263
CH2 rocking (side chain) 781, 753 764, 758
CH3 rocking 1027, 972, 924 1062, 972, 924
CH bending 1176 1331
P. Sharma et al. / European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638 2633
Table 5
Mix modes
Frequency (cmÿ1) Assignments % PED at d � 0
Calculated Observed
2915 2918 m[Ce±H]�79� � m[Ca±H](18)
2912 2918 m[Cb±H]�46� � m[Ce±H]�32� � m[Ca±H](22)
2909 2918 m[Cb±H]�48� � m[Ca±H]�34� � m[Ce±H](17)
2862 2866 m[Cb±H]�69� � m[Ce±H](26)
2861 2866 m[Ce±H]�74� � m[Cb±H](25)
1464 1463 /[H±Cc±H]�94� � /[Cb±Cc±H](5)
1463 1463 /[H±Ce±H]�79� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�9� � /[Ca±Ce±H](7)
1312 1309 /[H±Ce±Ca]�13� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�13� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�12� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�11� � m[Ca±Ce]�11� � m[Ce±
Ca]�9� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�8� � m[Ca±Cb](8)
1295 1286 m[Ce±Ca]�20� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�18� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�12� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�11� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�10� � /[H±Cb±
Cc]�8� � m[Ca±Cb](7)
1249 1265 /[Ca±Cb±H]�18� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�16� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�13� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�13� � m[Ca±Cb]�7� � m[Ca±
Ce](7)
1229 1238 /[H±Ce±Ca]�24� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�20� � /[Cb±Ca±H]�16� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�14� � m[Ca±Cb]�6� � /[Ca±Cb±
H](5)
1183 1176 /[H±Ca±Ce1]�25� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�18� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�13� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�11� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�9� � /[H±
Ca±Ce](8)
1173 1176 /[Cb±Ca±H]�29� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�15� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�15� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�11� � /[H±Ca±Ce](9)
1163 1161 /[H±Ce±Ca]�32� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�29� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�10� � /[H±Ca±Ce](5)
1123 1108 /[H±Cb±Cc]�37� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�34� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�12� � /[H±Ca±Ce1](9)
1118 1108 /[Ca±Cb±H]�32� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�31� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�12� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�9� � /[H±Ce±Ca](7)
1095 1074 /[Ca±Ce±H]�30� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�28� � /[Cb±Ca±H]�19� � /[H±Ca±Ce1](12)
1027 1027 /[Cb±Cc±H]�26� � m[Ce±Ca]�17� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�12� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�11� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�8� � m[Ca±
Cb](6)
1020 1027 /[Cb±Cc±H]�24� � m[Ce±Ca]�20� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�14� � m[Ca±Cb]�7� � /[H±Cb±Cc](6)
1008 1000 /[Cb±Cc±H]�52� � m[Ca±Cb]�13� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�11� � /[H±Cb±Cc](6)
965 972 /[Cb±Cc±H]�54� � m[Ce±Ca]�19� � /[Ca±Cb±H](6)
960 972 /[Cb±Cc±H]�55� � m[Ce±Ca](19)
935 924 /[Cb±Cc±H]�18� � m[Ca±Cb]�14� � m[Ce1±Ce]�14� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�11� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�6� � /[H±Ca±
Ce1]�6� � m[Cb±Cc](5)
926 924 /[Cb±Cc±H]�32� � m[Ca±Cb]�17� � m[Cb±Cc]�7� � m[Ca±Ce]�7� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�7� � /[Cb±Ca±
H]�6� � /[H±Ce±Ca](6)
884 883 m[Ca±Ce]�21� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�18� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�17� � /[Cb±Cc±H]�11� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�9� � m[Ca±
Cb](6)
839 ± m[Cb±Cc]�42� � m[Ca±Ce]�19� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�5� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca](5)
833 ± m[Cb±Cc]�68� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�8� � /[Ca±Ce±H](5)
798 807 m[Cb±Cc]�19� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�19� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�10� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�8� � /[Cb±Cc±H]�7� � m[Ca±
Ce]�7� � m[Ca±Cb](6)
778 781 /[H±Cb±Cc]�29� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�21� � /[Cb±Cc±H]�12� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�8� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�7� � m[Ce±
Ca](5)
755 753 m[Ca±Ce]�13� � m[Cb±Cc]�13� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�13� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�12� � m[Ca±Cb]�9� � /[H±Ce±
Ca]�8� � /[Cb±Cc±H]�6� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca](5)
725 725 m[Ca±Ce]�26� � m[Ca±Cb]�23� � m[Ce±Ca]�10� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�9� � /[H±Ce±Ca](9)
489 492 /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�18� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�17� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�13� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�7� � m[Ca±Cb]�6� � /[Cb±
Ca±H](5)
445 ± /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�17� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�13� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�10� � s[Ce±Ca]�8� � s[Ca±Ce1]�7� � /[H±Ca±
Ce1]�7� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�6� � /[Cb±Ca±H]�6� � /[H±Ca±Ce](5)
380 ± /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�24� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�17� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�17� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�16� � m[Ca±Ce](6)
328 ± /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�19� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�18� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�16� � m[Ce±Ca]�6� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�6� � /[Ce1±
Ca±Cb](5)
313 ± /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�20� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�17� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�17� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�9� � m[Ca±Ce]�8� � s[Ca±
Cb](5)
287 ± /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�24� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�17� � s[Ca±Ce1]�8� � s[Ce±Ca]�7� � m[Ca±Ce]�7� � /[Ca±Cb±
Cc]�6� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb](6)
214 ± s[Cb±Cc]�46� � s[Ca±Cb]�13� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�10� � s[Ce±Ca]�7� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�6� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb](5)
2634 P. Sharma et al. / European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638
Table 5 (continued)
Frequency (cmÿ1) Assignments % PED at d � 0
Calculated Observed
182 ± s[Cb±Cc](82)
170 ± /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�28� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�14� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�10� � s[Cb±Cc]�9� � s[Ca±Ce1](7)
163 ± s[Cb±Cc]�25� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�19� � s[Ca±Cb]�9� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�8� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�5� �/[H±Ca±Ce](5)
154 ± s[Ca±Cb]�26� � s[Cb±Cc]�19� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�13� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�12� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc](7)
111 ± s[Ca±Cb]�65� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�6� � s[Ca±Ce1]�6� � /[H±Cb±Cc](5)
98 ± s[Ca±Cb]�18� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�17� � s[Ce±Ca]�15� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�12� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�10� �s[Ca±Ce1](7)
70 ± s[Ca±Ce1]�20� � s[Ce±Ca]�14� � s[Ca±Cb]�10� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�10� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�7� � /[Ce±Ca±
Cb]�7� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�6� � /[H±Ce±Ca](5)
58 ± s[Ce±Ca]�29� � s[Ca±Cb]�19� � s[Ca±Ce1]�15� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�10� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�7� � /[H±Ce±Ca](6)
Assignments % PED at d � p
2914 2918 m[Ce±H]�54� � m[Ca±H]�23� � m[Cb±H](22)
2913 2918 m[Ce±H]�56� � m[Ca±H]�35� � m[Cb±H](9)
2910 2918 m[Cb±H]�73� � m[Ca±H]�19� � m[Ce±H](8)
2862 2866 m[Cb±H]�69� � m[Ce±H](26)
2861 2866 m[Ce±H]�73� � m[Cb±H](25)
1464 1463 /[H±Cc±H]�77� � /[H±Ce±H](15)
1464 1463 /[H±Ce±H]�64� � /[H±Cc±H]�19� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�7� � /[Ca±Ce±H](6)
1330 1309 /[H±Ce±Ca]�18� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�18� � m[Ca±Ce]�14� � m[Ca±Cb]�10� � m[Ce±Ca]�9� �/[H±Ca±Ce1]�7� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�6� � /[H±Cb±Cc](6)
1287 1286 /[H±Cb±Cc]�25� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�23� � m[Ca±Cb]�11� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�6� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�6� �m[Ce±Ca]�6� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�5� � m[Cb±Cc](5)
1248 1265 /[H±Ca±Ce]�26� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�16� � /[Cb±Ca±H]�14� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�13� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�7� �m[Ce±Ca]�6� � m[Ca±Cb](6)
1209 1238 /[H±Ce±Ca]�21� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�17� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�14� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�10� � /[H±Cb±
Cc]�9� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�8� � /[Cb±Ca±H](7)
1190 1176 /[H±Ca±Ce1]�16� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�16� � /[Cb±Ca±H]�15� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�13� � /[H±Ce±
Ca]�10� � /[Ca±Ce±H](9)
1180 1176 /[Ca±Ce±H]�28� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�23� � /[Cb±Ca±H]�16� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�8� � /[H±Cb±Cc](5)
1149 1161 /[Ca±Cb±H]�22� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�21� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�20� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�11� � /[Cb±Ca±H]�8� �/[H±Ca±Ce](7)
1127 1108 /[Ca±Ce±H]�26� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�26� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�11� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�11� � /[Cb±Ca±
H]�10� � /[H±Ca±Ce1](8)
1122 1108 /[H±Cb±Cc]�29� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�26� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�12� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�11� � /[H±Ce±
Ca]�6� � /[Ca±Ce±H](5)
1111 1074 /[H±Cb±Cc]�25� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�21� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�19� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�12� � /[H±Ca±
Ce]�10� � /[Cb±Ca±H](6)
1031 1027 m[Ce±Ca]�20� � /[Cb±Cc±H]�17� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�12� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�10� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�10� �/[Cb±Ca±H]�7� � m[Ca±Cb](5)
1013 1027 /[Cb±Cc±H]�46� � m[Ca±Cb]�15� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�11� � /[H±Cb±Cc]�5� � /[Cb±Ca±H](5)
1011 1000 /[Cb±Cc±H]�33� � m[Ce±Ca]�18� � /[H±Ca±Ce]�13� � m[Ca±Cb]�9� � /[H±Cb±Cc](5)
966 972 /[Cb±Cc±H]�68� � m[Ce±Ca]�11� � /[Ca±Cb±H](5)
954 972 /[Cb±Cc±H]�38� � m[Ce±Ca]�29� � /[H±Ca±Ce1](5)
939 924 /[Cb±Cc±H]�34� � m[Ca±Cb]�10� � m[Ce1±Ce]�10� � /[Cb±Ca±H]�9� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�8� �/[Ca±Ce±H](5)
927 924 /[Cb±Cc±H]�20� � m[Ca±Ce]�13� � m[Ca±Cb]�11� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�11� � m[Ce±Ca]�9� � /[H±Ce±
Ca]�7� � m[Cb±Cc](6)
866 883 m[Cb±Cc]�16� � m[Ca±Cb]�16� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�15� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�15� � /[Cb±Cc±H]�10� � m[Ce1±Ce](6)
848 ± m[Cb±Cc]�33� � m[Ca±Ce]�21� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�8� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�8� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�5� � /[H±Cb±Cc](5)
823 ± m[Cb±Cc]�52� � m[Ca±Ce]�24� � /[H±Ca±Ce1](5)
800 807 m[Cb±Cc]�39� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�16� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�15� � m[Ca±Cb]�9� � /[Cb±Cc±H]�5� � s[Ce±Ca](5)
(continued on next page)
P. Sharma et al. / European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638 2635
The 380 cmÿ1 mode has a major contribution of Ce±
Ca±Cb bending mixed with the other bendings of bb and
sc as Ce±Ca±Ce1 [17%] and Ce1±Ca±Cb [17%]. The
contribution of side chain mode decreases until the helix
angle and the energy drops to 402 cmÿ1. It becomes
purely a bb bending mode. The mode at 328 cmÿ1 shows
a maximum dispersion of 35 wave numbers to reach 363
cmÿ1 at the zone boundary. The mode at 313 cmÿ1 is
Table 5 (continued)
Frequency (cmÿ1) Assignments % PED at d � 0
Calculated Observed
780 781 /[H±Cb±Cc]�35� � /[Ca±Cb±H]�27� � /[Cb±Cc±H]�15� � s[Ca±Cb](6)
740 753 m[Ca±Cb]�21� � m[Ca±Ce]�14� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�13� � m[Ce±Ca]�10� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�10� � m[Cb±
Cc]�10� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca](5)
725 725 m[Ca±Ce]�25� � /[Ca±Ce±H]�5� � /[H±Ce±Ca]�15� � m[Ca±Cb]�10� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca](5)
474 492 /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�17� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�16� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�12� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�10� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1](9)
452 ± /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�32� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�17� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�10� � /[Cb±Ca±H](5)
402 ± /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�38� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�11� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�10� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�6� � m[Ca±Ce](5)
363 ± /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�27� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�16� � m[Ca±Cb]�8� � s[Ce±Ca]�8� � /[H±Ca±Ce1]�7� � /[Ce±Ca±
Cb]�6� � m[Ca±Ce]�5� � /[Cb±Ca±H](5)
285 ± /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�18� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�15� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�15� � s[Ca±Cb]�10� � s[Ca±Ce1]�9� � s[Ce±
Ca]�8� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb](5)
264 ± /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�30� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�14� � m[Ca±Ce]�10� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�9� � s[Ca±Ce1]�9� �s[Cb±Cc](6)
232 ± s[Ce±Ca]�22� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�19� � s[Cb±Cc]�14� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�11� � s[Ca±Cb](8)
205 ± s[Cb±Cc]�43� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�11� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�10� � s[Ca±Ce1]�9� � s[Ca±Cb](7)
189 ± s[Cb±Cc]�62� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�10� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca](7)
161 ± /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�24� � s[Cb±Cc]�16� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�12� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�11� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca](10)
157 ± s[Cb±Cc]�32� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�17� � s[Ca±Cb]�16� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc](9)
141 ± s[Ca±Cb]�42� � s[Cb±Cc]�15� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�10� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�9� � s[Ca±Ce1](7)
82 ± s[Ca±Cb]�35� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�16� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�13� � /[Ca±Cb±Cc]�7� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�6� �s[Ce±Ca](6)
75 ± s[Ca±Cb]�42� � /[Ce1±Ca±Cb]�20� � /[Ca±Ce±Ca]�9� � /[Ce±Ca±Cb]�8� � /[H±Cb±Cc](5)
56 ± s[Ca±Ce1]�41� � s[Ce±Ca]�19� � /[Ce±Ca±Ce1]�12� � /[Cb±Ca±H](6)
Fig. 3. (a) Dispersion curves of sPB (1350±950 cmÿ1) and (b)
density of states g(m) (1350±950 cmÿ1).
Fig. 4. (a) Dispersion curves of sPB (1000±700 cmÿ1) and (b)
density of states g(m) (1000±700 cmÿ1).
2636 P. Sharma et al. / European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638
another dispersive mode with contributions from the
bendings of �Ce1±Ca±Cb� 20%� �Ca±Cb±Cc� 17% ��Ce±Ca±Cb� 17%� �Ca±Ce±Ca� 9% and stretch of (Ca±
Ce) 8% which appears at 285 cmÿ1 at d � p. The mode at
182 cmÿ1 has 82% contribution from methyl torsion
vibration at d � 0. As the d value is increased, the per-
centage contribution of methyl group torsion vibration
goes on decreasing upto 40% at d � 0:65p. On further
increase in d value, the methyl torsion increases again
and the mode with 43% contribution of methyl torsion,
Fig. 7. Variation of heat capacity Cv with temperature.
Fig. 5. (a) Dispersion curves of sPB (500±250 cmÿ1) and (b)
density of states g(m) (500±250 cmÿ1).
Fig. 6. (a) Dispersion curves of sPB (250±00 cmÿ1) and (b)
density of states g(m) (250±00 cmÿ1).
P. Sharma et al. / European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638 2637
reaches 205 cmÿ1 at d � p. The mode at 287 cmÿ1 dis-
perses by 23 wave numbers at d � p.
3.5. Density of states and heat capacity
As explained in the theory, the inverse of the slope of
the dispersion curves leads to the density of states which
indicate how the energy is partitioned in various normal
modes. These are shown in Figs. 3±6. The peaks in the
frequency distribution curves compare well with the
observed frequencies. The frequency distribution func-
tion can also be used to calculate the thermodynamical
properties such as heat capacity, enthalpy changes, etc.
It has been used to obtain the heat capacity as a function
of temperature. The predictive values of heat capacity
have been calculated and plotted within the temperature
range 50±500 K (Fig. 7). The contribution to the heat
capacity due to purely skeletal, purely side chain and the
mixture of two are calculated separately and plotted in
Fig. 6. The maximum contribution comes from the
mixed modes. However, the contribution from the lat-
tice modes is bound to make a di�erence to the heat
capacity because of its sensitivity to low frequency
modes. At present, the calculation of dispersion curves
for a three-dimensional crystal is extremely di�cult be-
cause of the large matrix size and enormous number of
interactions which are di�cult to visualize and quantify.
Inspite of several limitations involved in the calculation
of speci®c heat and absence of experimental data, the
present work would provide a good starting point for
further basic studies on the thermodynamical behavior
of the polymer.
Although the spectra are not available below 450
cmÿ1, calculations are expected to be correct for more
than one reason. First, most of the frequencies occur in
the same range as the corresponding ones in other syn-
thetic polymers. Second, since the force constants which
provide good matching in the higher frequency region
are also involved in the lower frequency region, rea-
sonable values are expected in this region as well.
References
[1] De Rosa C, Venditto V, Guerra G, Pirozzi B, Corradini P.
Macromolecules 1991;24:5645.
[2] Holland-Moritz K, Sausen E. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed
1979;17:1.
[3] Cornell SW, Koenig JL. J Polym Sci 1969;A-2(7):1965.
[4] Ukita M. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1966;39:742.
[5] Abenoza M, Armengaud A. Polymer 1981;22:1341.
[6] Luongo JP, Salovey R. J Polym Sci 1966;A-2(4):997.
[7] Ishioka T, Wakisaka H, Kanesaka I, Nishimura M,
Fukasawa H. Polymer 1997;38(10):2421.
[8] Ewen JA. J Am Chem Soc 1984;106:6355.
[9] Kaminsky W, Kuple K, Brintzinger HH, Wild FRWP.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 1985;24:507.
[10] Ishihara N, Seimiya T, Kuramoto M, Koi M. Macromol-
ecules 1986;19:1464.
[11] Zambelli A, Longo P, Pellecchia C, Grassi A. Macromol-
ecules 1987;20:2035.
[12] Ewen JA, Jones RL, Razavi A, Ferrara JD. J Am Chem
Soc 1988;110:6255.
[13] De Rosa C, Venditto V, Guerra G, Corradini P. Makro-
mol Chem 1992;193:1351.
[14] De Rosa C, Scaldarella D. Macromolecules 1997;30:4153.
[15] Rastogi S, Tandon P, Gupta VD. J Macromol Sci Phys
1998;B37(5):683.
[16] Misra NK, Kapoor D, Tandon P, Gupta VD. Polym J
1997;29(11):914.
[17] Burman L, Tandon P, Gupta VD, Rastogi S, Srivastava S.
Biopolymers 1996;38:53.
[18] Bahuguna GP, Rastogi S, Tandon P, Gupta VD. Polymer
1996;37:745.
[19] Wilson Jr. EB. J Chem Phys 1939;7:1047.
[20] Wilson Jr. EB. J Chem Phys 1941;9:76.
[21] Wilson Jr. EB, Decius JC, Cross PC. Molecular vibrations:
the theory of infrared and Raman vibrational spectra. New
York: Dover Publications, 1980.
[22] Higgs PW. Proc Roy Soc London 1953;A220:472.
2638 P. Sharma et al. / European Polymer Journal 36 (2000) 2629±2638