Upload
zelda-rutledge
View
14
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
VFC status. 10-02-2011. -The test set-up- SW and Simulation. S-FPGA code. Python test Routines and Board ‘Driver’. VME master model. VFC model. A-FPGA code. Verilog simulation. Linux PC. -The test set-up- SW and HW. S-FPGA code. Python test Routines and Board ‘Driver’. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
VFC status
10-02-2011
-The test set-up-SW and Simulation
Python test Routines andBoard ‘Driver’
VME mastermodel
S-FPGA code
A-FPGA code
VFC
model Verilog simulation
Linux PC
-The test set-up-SW and HW
Python test Routines andBoard ‘Driver’
VMEioLibrary
S-FPGA code
A-FPGA codeVFC MEN A20
VME crate
What we can do today
• The boards can be accessed via VME• The System FPGA can be programmed via the PROM at
power up• The communication between the System and the
Application FPGAs is implemented using the slow (4 *100Mbps) bus
• The 2 SRAMS are working at least up to 100MHz • It is possible to control the VADJ1 between 1.2 and 3.3V
from the S-FPGA using the dedicated digital potentiometer
• The front panel lemo connection are all working
What remains to be tested
• PLLs, Voltage monitoring ADC, VCTXO DAC (Interfaces available, working on the SW)
• SiLab XO (reprogramming)• 1-wire unique ID and temperature monitoring• GBit interfaces• DDS (configuration interface available)• DDR3• Rear Transition Module (P2) and FMCs
connection bandwidth
Identified bugs
• Inverted polarity on the LVDS output of the DDS (180 degree phase shift)
• The direction pin on the LVDS and TTL buffer cannot be controlled (requires manual soldering resulting in a fixed direction)
• Wrong name on the schematic for 2 signals• The swing of the VCTXO from Rakon is too
smallPossible solder problem on some VME buffers due to the layout
What we might want to change
• The SRAMs for QDRs
• Do we want to keep the P0?
Available HW
• 2 working VFC
• 10 VFC ordered