16
(Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

(Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

(Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels

(Channels 9 – 14)

Carl Mears

Remote Sensing Systems

Page 2: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

AMSU and SSU Weighting Functions

AMSU 9

AMSU 10

AMSU 11

AMSU 12

AMSU 13

SSU 15x

SSU 25

SSU 26SSU 27

Page 3: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Some Results from the Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere

Page 4: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Problems with AMSUMid-Troposphere

Funny behavior for near-limb views

Page 5: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Problems with AMSU(Near Tropopause)

Other channels at least as bad!

Some indication that target factor could be FOV dependent!

Page 6: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Problems with AMSU

How do we figure out which AMSU instrument is bad (or at least, less bad)

• Radiosondes probably not accurate enough

• Time period too short for water vapor to help

• NOAA-16 farther way from NOAA-14 MSU (but this is an old instrument)

Solution: Figure out which AMSU has a more consistent dataset by looking at all channels (and nadir vs limb views)

Page 7: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Probable vertical structure of trends

Trend

Height

Tropopause

Page 8: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Trends – NOAA-15 and NOAA-16Tropical Oceans, 30S to 30N

NOAA-15: Fairly consistent

except for Channel 6.

NOAA-16: All channels inconsistent except for (maybe) channel 4.

Page 9: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Trends – NOAA-15 and NOAA-16 Tropical Oceans, 30S to 30N, 2002-2006

NOAA-15: Fairly consistent

except for Channel 6.

NOAA-16: All channels inconsistent except for (maybe) channel 4.

Conclusion: NOAA-16 more likely to be the problem – NOAA-16 is removed.

Page 10: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Now, the Stratosphere

• Basis strategy – apply the same analysis to the stratospheric channels to see if NOAA-16 has problems for these channels too.

• Very preliminary, since we have not performed any diurnal adjustment.

• Difficult to evaluate channels 11 and 14 due to short (or zero) overlap

Page 11: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Trends, 2002-2006, K/decade60S to 60N

Trends broadly consistent for all stratospheric channels

Nadir-limb difference seems too large

- related to diurnal drift?

Page 12: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Channel 10 Time Series

Tem

pera

ture

Tem

pera

ture

Ano

mal

yN

OA

A-1

6 –

NO

AA

15

For Channel 10, everything is fairly well behaved.

Page 13: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Channel 12 Time Series

Tem

pera

ture

Tem

pera

ture

Ano

mal

yN

OA

A-1

6 –

NO

AA

15

For Channel 12, descending node shows significant drift.

Page 14: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Adjusting for drifts in measurement time

NOAA satellites drift in local measurement time

If uncorrected, these would lead to spurious long-term

signals in the dataset.

NOAA-15

NOAA-16

Page 15: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

NOAA-16 minus NOAA-15 differencesby field of view.

Drift in descending node strongly dependent on field of view.

At least part of this is due to drift in measurement time.

Page 16: (Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems

Conclusions

• Where we can evaluate them, the stratospheric channels on AMSU appear to be in better shape than the tropospheric channels.

• Need to come up with a reasonable diurnal adjustment– 4 AMSUs with different measurement times

– Stratospheric model data with output every 3 hours

– Microwave Limb Sounder probably not useful.