4
Analyzing High Resolution Topography Unit 2.1 Reading: Slope Design Considerations Yonathan Admassu (James Madison University) The following rockfall hazard rating system (Pierson, 1991) was developed through rolling rocks from quarries and road cuts to see how they traveled depending on the hill and catchment area slopes. The chosen slope angles should be based on the kinematic analysis. The maximum height of a single slope should not exceed 40 ft due to the limitations of blasting techniques. Your choice of slope angles are Vertical, 0.25H:1V, 0.5H:1V, and 0.75H:1V (90°, 76°, 63°, and 53°, respectively). If the slope is higher than 40 ft, a bench must be placed as an offset bench (shown above). The offset benches should be flat and wide enough to catch rockfalls. You should also provide a catchment ditch at the toe of the slope to catch rockfalls. Use the attached charts (after Pierson 1991) to design flat mid-slope benches (flat) and catchment ditches (flat to 4H:1V [0° to 14°]). Vertical Cut Slope Questions or comments please contact admassyx AT jmu.edu or education AT unavco.org Page 1 Version May 4, 2018

Vertical Cut Slope · Web viewslope angles should be based on the kinematic analysis. The maximum height of a single slope should not exceed 40 ft due to the limitations of blasting

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Vertical Cut Slope · Web viewslope angles should be based on the kinematic analysis. The maximum height of a single slope should not exceed 40 ft due to the limitations of blasting

Analyzing High Resolution Topography Unit 2.1Reading: Slope Design ConsiderationsYonathan Admassu (James Madison University)

The following rockfall hazard rating system (Pierson, 1991) was developed through rolling rocks from quarries and road cuts to see how they traveled depending on the hill and catchment area slopes. The chosen slope angles should be based on the kinematic analysis. The maximum height of a single slope should not exceed 40 ft due to the limitations of blasting techniques. Your choice of slope angles are Vertical, 0.25H:1V, 0.5H:1V, and 0.75H:1V (90°, 76°, 63°, and 53°, respectively). If the slope is higher than 40 ft, a bench must be placed as an offset bench (shown above). The offset benches should be flat and wide enough to catch rockfalls. You should also provide a catchment ditch at the toe of the slope to catch rockfalls. Use the attached charts (after Pierson 1991) to design flat mid-slope benches (flat) and catchment ditches (flat to 4H:1V [0° to 14°]).

Vertical Cut Slope

Questions or comments please contact admassyx AT jmu.edu or education AT unavco.org Page 1Version May 4, 2018

Page 2: Vertical Cut Slope · Web viewslope angles should be based on the kinematic analysis. The maximum height of a single slope should not exceed 40 ft due to the limitations of blasting

Reading: Slope Design Considerations

0.25H:1V (76°) Cut Slope

Questions or comments please contact admassyx AT jmu.edu or education AT unavco.org Page 2Version May 4, 2018

Page 3: Vertical Cut Slope · Web viewslope angles should be based on the kinematic analysis. The maximum height of a single slope should not exceed 40 ft due to the limitations of blasting

Reading: Slope Design Considerations

0.5H:1V (63°) Cut Slope

Questions or comments please contact admassyx AT jmu.edu or education AT unavco.org Page 3Version May 4, 2018

Page 4: Vertical Cut Slope · Web viewslope angles should be based on the kinematic analysis. The maximum height of a single slope should not exceed 40 ft due to the limitations of blasting

Reading: Slope Design Considerations

0.75H:1V (53°) Cut Slope

Sometimes steeper slopes can be justified if mechanical slope stabilizing methods are in place. In the photograph below, rock bolts are used to anchor potentially unstable rock blocks. Fences shown below are also used if a catchment ditch is deemed inadequate to prevent rockfalls from entering the roadway.

ReferencesPierson, L. A., Gullixson, F.C., and R.G. Chassie, 2001, Rockfall Catchment Area Design Guide Final Report, SPR-3(032), Oregon Department of Transportation, 92 pp. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/geotech/references/Rockfall_References/32_Pierson_Rockfall_Catchment_Area_Design_Guide.pdf

Questions or comments please contact admassyx AT jmu.edu or education AT unavco.org Page 4Version May 4, 2018