ventura (1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    1/29

    1

    AAPS WORKSHOP

    SEPTEMBER 11 12, 2006

    Quality By Design

    Implementation

    Dominic Ventura, Ph.D.

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    2/29

    2

    Quality by DesignThe Desired State

    Product quality and performance achieved andassured by design of effective and efficientmanufacturing processes

    Product specifications based on mechanisticunderstanding of how formulation and processfactors impact product performance

    An ability to affect continuous improvement andcontinuous real time assurance of quality

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    3/29

    3

    Quality by Design

    Mitigating Risk in Pharmaceutical Development

    A process is well understood when:

    All critical sources of variability are identified and explained

    Variability is managed by the process, and,

    Product quality attributes can be accurately and reliablyPREDICTED over the DESIGN SPACE established formaterials used, process parameters, manufacturing,environmental and other conditions.

    Guidance for Industry: PAT A Framework for Innovative PharmaceuticalDevelopment, Manufacturing and Quality Assurance,page 6

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    4/29

    4

    Quality by Design?Product Development Knowledge (Public Databases or in Submissions)

    Level of Sophistication

    HIGH

    MEDIUM

    LOW

    Details Resolve

    HIG

    MEDIU

    LO(HISTORICAL) DATA DERIVED FROM

    TRIAL-N-ERROR EXPERIMENTATION

    HEURISTIC RULES

    EMPIRICALMODELS

    MECHANISTICMODELS

    1stPrinciples

    Dr. Ajaz Hussein

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    5/29

    5

    Material

    CharacteristicsHamaker constant

    Dielectric constant

    Youngs modulus

    Particle

    AttributesPSD

    Shape

    Composition

    Equipment

    DesignGeometry

    Constituent parts

    Material properties

    Operating

    ConditionsSpeed of moving parts

    Temperature

    Humidity

    Bulk MechanicalPropertiesAngle of repose

    Unconfined yield stress

    Forces Actingon Particles

    Adhesion forces

    Impact forces

    Performance

    of a Unit

    Dr. Ajaz HusseinAIChE Journal 47: 107-125 (2001)

    Quality by Design

    Performance of a Solids Processing Units

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    6/29

    6

    Quality by DesignThe Way Forward

    Identify and control all sources of

    variability

    Raw materials

    Process

    Environmental

    Manage variability through the

    process

    Uncertainty the inability to determine or

    the ambiguity in the true state of a system

    caused by a combination of variability and

    incomplete knowledge (ICH Q9)

    Reduce UNCERTAINTY Control VARIABILITY

    Mitigate risk

    Knowledge transfer to manufacturing and regulatorybodies

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    7/29

    7

    MANUFACTURING

    EXCELLENCE

    LEVELS

    OF

    MANUFACTURING

    EXCELLENCE

    TIME

    L

    AU

    N

    C

    H

    Learning Before Doing

    Learning By Doing

    QbD

    Continuous Improvement

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    8/29

    8

    Where To Start

    Dosage Form Considerations

    Extended Release vs. Immediate?

    Clinical Considerations

    Established IVIVcDrug Product Attributes

    Low Dose?

    Drug Substance Attributes

    Stable Polymorph, hydroscopic?

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    9/29

    9

    Basic Concept of BCS

    Drug

    Product

    Absorbed

    drug

    Dissolved

    Drugkd

    kp

    kd = dissolution rate

    function of drug solubility and drug

    product quality attributes

    kp = permeability rate

    major function of API structure

    minor dependence on salt form and

    excipients.

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    10/29

    10

    DEFINITIONS

    Critical Quality AttributesPurity

    Potency

    BioavailabilityCritical Process Parameters

    - Critical To Quality Attributes

    (API, DP properties that can affect

    CQAs)

    - Key Process Variables

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    11/29

    11

    DrugDrug

    ReleaseRelease

    RateRate

    Disintegration,Disintegration,

    Erosion and GranuleErosion and Granule

    DissolutionDissolution

    APIAPISolubilizationSolubilization

    (rate/extent)(rate/extent)

    PorosityPorosity

    APIAPI Form SelectionForm Selection

    (Salt, Polymorph, Particle(Salt, Polymorph, Particle

    Size)Size)

    HardnessHardness WettingWetting

    Swelling/Swelling/

    WaterWater

    PenetrationPenetration

    DP Excipient Selection, DP Process SelectionDP Excipient Selection, DP Process Selection

    API Form Selection, API Process SelectionAPI Form Selection, API Process Selection

    Quality AttributesQuality Attributes

    Of Drug ProductOf Drug Product

    Features of Quality by Design: doing things consciously*Features of Quality by Design: doing things consciously*

    *A Quality by Design Approach to Dissolution Based on the Biopharmaceutical Classification*A Quality by Design Approach to Dissolution Based on the Biopharmaceutical Classification

    System, R. ReedSystem, R. Reed

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    12/29

    12

    RISK MANAGEMENT

    Risk Benefit

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    13/29

    13

    Quality Risk Assessment (QRA)

    FMEA: Risk scores based on

    probability, severity, and detectability

    Risk Prioritization Matrix

    Quality Function Deployment

    Fish bone or Ishikawa diagram Pareto Chart

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    14/29

    14

    ELEMENTS OF A SUCCESSFUL QbD

    PROGRAM

    Robust Product

    Process

    Formulation

    & Materials

    Equipment

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    15/29

    15

    Risk Prioritization Matrix

    QUALITYATTRIBUT

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    16/29

    16

    Tablet Hardness

    Basic risk facilitation methods

    Cause EffectDiagram

    for Tablet

    Hardness

    Compression

    Roller Compaction

    Raw MaterialBlending

    EnvironmentalMaterial

    Transfer

    Hardness of Tablet

    (Friability)

    Pre & Post CompressionPress speed

    Feeder speedMaterial addition

    Feed frame settingFill Weight

    Cam selectionTooling

    Roll GapRoll force

    Porosity (den)PSD

    Ribbon strength

    APIHPMC

    TALCMg. Stea

    Temp.Humidity

    Blend time

    Blend rpm

    Order ofddn.Fill Vol.

    Discharge rateSurface

    DischargeStorage

    MoistureTransport

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    17/29

    17

    Pareto Chart: Relative Importance of

    Inputs

    0.00%

    2.00%

    4.00%

    6.00%

    8.00%

    10.00%

    12.00%

    14.00%

    HPM

    C

    K100CR

    POROSITY

    PRESSSPEED

    CO

    MPRESSION

    FORCE

    FE

    EDER

    SPEED

    LUBETIME

    PSD

    OFINTRA-

    GRANU

    LAR

    BLEND

    APIPARTICLESIZE

    BLEND

    TIME

    PRE-C

    OMPFORCE

    EXCIPIENT

    PA

    RTICLESIZE

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    18/29

    18

    DEFINITIONS

    Design Space Clinical Relevance

    Control Space Process Capability

    Control Strategy Change Control

    Continuous Improvement

    Regulatory Considerations

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    19/29

    19

    Robust Manufacturing Processes

    Process and Control Parameters

    Clinical relevance

    Ribbon Attributes

    Porosity

    Process Parameter Attributes

    Blending time/end point

    Roll force

    Roll gap

    Roll speedFeed screw rate

    Milling conditions

    Blend time/end point

    Compression forcePress speed

    Feeder speed

    Granule Attributes

    psd

    Tablet Attributes hardness

    Bin Blend

    Roller Compaction

    Bin Blend

    Compression

    Film Coating

    Raw MaterialAttributes

    Hypromellose Viscosity, Methoxyl,hydroxypropyl content,

    Particle size

    Blend Uniformity

    Blend Uniformity

    Pan Speed

    EEF

    Appearance,

    Tablet weight gain

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    20/29

    20

    Critical & Non Critical Parameters

    Control Space/Design Space (Example)

    Table 3.1-6: Roller Compaction

    Unit Operation

    Critical / Non-

    Critical

    Parameter

    Control Space Design Space Key Attributes

    Roller Compaction

    -Roll Gap

    -Roll Force

    CriticalCritical

    Table 3.1-7 for

    100 mg andTable 3.1-8 for

    200 mg

    Table 3.1-7 for 100

    mg andTable 3.1-8 for 200

    mg

    Particle Size

    Distribution

    (in line)

    Tablet Hardness

    Dissolution

    -Feed Screw Speed Non-Critical

    Not Applicable Not Applicablea

    Roll Speed Non-Critical7-9 6-10

    Milling

    -Pre-granulator

    -Fine Screen

    granulator

    Non-Critical

    Non-Critical

    Adjust rpm to

    maintain

    throughput

    Adjust rpm to

    maintain throughput

    a. Controlled by Roll Gap

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    21/29

    21

    52.11%

    Polymer conc. 40-52.1%

    Roll Gap 1.8 2.2 mm

    Roll force 45-65 bar

    Polymer conc. 40-52.1%

    Roll Gap 3.0-3.8 mm

    Roll force 55-65 bar

    Poly

    mer

    Roll

    force

    R

    oll

    g

    ap

    40%

    55 bar 65 bar

    3.0 mm

    3.8 mm

    40%

    52.11%

    Scale

    up

    Poly

    mer

    Roll

    force

    R

    oll

    gap

    45 bar 65 bar

    1.8 mm

    2.2 mm

    Pilot-scale (design space) Manufacturing scale (predicted

    design space)

    Quality by Design -Tablet DevelopmentScale-up Parameters for Roller Compaction

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    22/29

    22

    Quality by Design - Tablet DevelopmentConfirmation of Design Space at Mfrg Scale

    Poly

    mer

    Roll

    force

    Roll

    gap

    52.1%

    40.0%

    55 bar 65 bar

    3.0

    mm

    3.8

    mm

    4.0 mm

    2.8 mm

    3.2 mm

    3.4 mm

    3.6 mm

    3.8 mm

    70 bar

    Failed batch

    Good batch

    Batches ManufacturedOutside the of the RollCompaction DesignSpace Fail TabletCompression

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    23/29

    23

    Control/Design Space Critical Process

    Parameters Critical Process Parameters (CPP) identified using a risk analysis

    investigated extensively using a DOE.

    Design Space

    Established on the basis of the DOE and experience during

    manufacture of clinical/registration batchesIn certain cases where response of critical quality attribute

    studied/investigated was insignificant, extrapolation was used toexpand/establish design space

    Control SpaceSubset of design space established on the basis of processcapability, prior knowledge

    Intent is to stay within the control space during commercialmanufacturing

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    24/29

    24

    Control/Design Space Non-

    Critical Process Parameters

    Non-Critical Process Parameters those identified as low

    risk which lead to low probability of product failure

    Design Space

    Established on the basis of range studies (in some cases

    DOEs) and manufacturing experience at various scales

    Control Space

    Subset of design space established on the basis of process

    capability, prior knowledge

    Intent is to stay within the control space during commercial

    manufacturing

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    25/29

    25

    Design Space and Control Space

    Design SpaceMulti-dimensional space that encompasses combinations of productdesign, manufacturing process design, critical manufacturing processparameters and component attributes that provide assurance of suitableproduct quality and performance

    Control SpaceMulti-dimensional space that encompasses process operatingparameters and component quality measurements that assure process orproduct quality. It is a subset of the design space

    Control Strategy

    Strategy/Methodology to mitigate risks associated with the batch whenthe critical and non-critical process parameters fall outside the controlspace butwithin the design space

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    26/29

    26

    Control strategy - Critical Process Parameters

    HPMC

    Single point dissolution within control space

    Dissolution profile when HPMC outside control space butwithin design space is used

    Roll Gap and Roll Force

    Single point dissolution within control spaceDissolution profile when roll gap and roll force are outside

    control space but within design space is used

    Impact of product being manufactured outside control space and

    within design space will be assessed through the Event ReportForms

    If control space is revised based on experience duringmanufacturing, will manage the change through the plant changecontrol system and notify the agency via the annual report

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    27/29

    i i f i i i

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    28/29

    28

    Decision Tree for Batch Disposition Based

    on Control/Design Space Non-CPPs

    Are all non-CPPs withintheir control

    spaces?

    Generate anEventReportForm

    NO

    YES

    Batch

    disposition

    No action,proceed as

    usual

    Impact of Eventand action

    assessed by QA

    Track and TrendEvents to monitor

    type and number ofoccurrences

    React and studywhen number of

    occurrences indicateout of trends

  • 8/8/2019 ventura (1)

    29/29

    29

    Closing Statement

    Lead or Bleed!

    Just Do It!

    The future aint what it use to be!