Upload
veena-reddy-singam
View
17
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dissolution Test EquipmentUnder the guidance of
Mr . MA . Sirajuddeen M Pharm , DCT.( PhD )
Seminar Presented ByVeena Reddy . Singam
Roll no:05 , first year ,M Pharmacy ,Department of pharmaceutics.Omega College of pharmacy .
1
Dissolution is a process in which a solid substance solubilizes in a given solvent i.e. mass transfer from the solid surface to the liquid phase.
Rate of dissolution is the amount of drug substance that goes in solution per unit time under standardized conditions of liquid/solid interface, temperature and solvent composition.
2
DefinitionDefinition
Immediate release dosage forms• powders, granules / beads, tablets, capsules
Controlled release dosage forms• powders, granules / beads, tablets, capsules
Transdermal systems Implants
3
Dosage forms to be tested
United States Pharmacopeia• UXX (30)SP X
European Pharmacopoeia• Ph. Eur. 5th Edition, Supplement 5.3
British Pharmacopoeia• BP 2007
Japanese Pharmacopoeia• JP XIV (14)
4
Official Dissolution Monographs
USP 30 classification1.Rotating Basket (Ph.Eur./BP/JP)
2.Paddle (Ph.Eur./BP/JP)
3.Reciprocating Cylinder (Ph.Eur.)
4.Flow Through Cell (Ph.Eur./BP/JP)
5.Paddle Over Disk (Ph.Eur.)
6.Rotating Cylinder (Ph.Eur.)
7.Reciprocating Holder
5
Official dissolution apparatus
Depends on intention1. Quality control
Examining batch homogeneity Examining batch to batch conformity Examining stability
2. Research & Development Examining drug release behavior of preformulations In vitro simulation of the gastrointestinal
passage
3. IVIVC 6
Which type of dissolution apparatus?
Design Consists of an approximately 1 inch (25.4mm)
× 1 3/8 inch (34.925mm) stainless steel, 40-mesh wire basket rotated at a constant speed between 25 and 150rpm.
The distance between the inside bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the basket is maintained at 25 ± 2 mm during the test.
A speed-regulating device is used that allows the shaft rotation speed to be selected and maintained at a specified rate, within ± 4 per cent.
7
Apparatus 1 - Basket
Useful for• Capsules• Beads• Delayed release / enteric
coated dosage forms• Floating dosage forms• Surfactants in media
Standard volume• 900/1000 ml• 1, 2, 4 liter vessels
8
Apparatus 1 - Basket
Advantages• Breadth of experience
(more than 200 monographs)
• Full pH change during the test
• Can be easily automated which is important for routine investigations
9
Apparatus 1 - Basket
Disadvantages• Disintegration-dissolution
interaction
• Hydrodynamic dead zone under the basket
• Degassing is particularly important
• Limited volume sink conditions for poorly soluble drugs ?
10
Apparatus 1 - Basket
11
Apparatus 1 - Basket
Design The specifications for Apparatus 2 are
identical with those for Apparatus 1 except that the paddle is substituted for the rotating basket.
The contours of the paddle blade must not include any sharp edges at the tips for instance that could produce turbulent instead of laminar flow patterns.
The USP suggests that paddles ‘may’ be coated with polyfluorocarbon and most commercial paddles are accordingly coated.
Rotation speed for solid dosage forms is 50 RPM, while for Liquid dosage forms (SUSPENSION) its 25 RPM.12
Apparatus 2 - paddle
Useful for• Tablets• Capsules• Beads• Delayed release / enteric
coated dosage forms
Standard volume• 900/1000 ml
Method of first choice !!!13
Apparatus 2 - paddle
Advantages• Easy to use
• Robust
• Can be easily adapted to apparatus 5
• Long experience
• PH change possible
• Can be easily automated which is important for routine investigations
14
Apparatus 2 - paddle
Disadvantages• PH or media change is often difficult
• Limited volume sink conditions for poorly soluble drugs ?
• Hydrodynamics are complex, they vary with site of the dosage form in the vessel (sticking,floating) and therefore may significantly affect drug dissolution
• Coning
• Sinkers for floating dosage forms15
Apparatus 2 - paddle
16
Sinker types
JP/ USP / Ph. Eur. 5.3 Sinker
17
Conning
18
Apparatus 2 - paddle
Design A set of cylindrical, flat-bottomed glass vessels; A set of glass reciprocating cylinders. Inert fittings (stainless steel type 316 or other
suitable material). Screens that are made of suitable nonsorbing
and nonreactive material, and that are designed to fit the tops and bottoms of the reciprocating cylinders;
A motor and drive assembly to reciprocate the cylinders vertically inside the vessels.
19
Apparatus 3 – Reciprocting cylinder
20
Apparatus 3 – Reciprocting cylinder
Useful for• Tablets• Beads• Controlled release formulations
Standard volume• 200-250 ml per station
21
Apparatus 3 – Reciprocting cylinder
Advantages• Easy to change the pH• PH-profiles• Hydrodynamics can be
directly influenced by varying the dip rate
Disadvantages• Small volume (max. 250 ml)• Little experience• Limited data
22
Apparatus 3 – Reciprocting cylinder
Design A pump for the dissolution medium. A flow-through cell. A water-bath to maintain the dissolution
medium at 37 ± 0.5°C. The pump forces the dissolution medium
upwards through the flow-through cell. The flow-through cell of transparent and inert
material is mounted vertically, with a filter system that prevents escape of undissolved particles from the top of the cell; standard cell diameters are 12 mm and 22.6 mm.
23
Apparatus 4 –Flow-through cell
Useful for• Low solubility drugs• Microparticulates• Implants• Suppositories• Controlled release formulations
Variations• Open system• Closed system 24
Apparatus 4 –Flow-through cell
25
Cell types
26
Apparatus 4 –Flow-through cell Advantages
• Easy to change media pH• PH-profile possible• Sink conditions• Different modes
a) Open systemb) Closed system
Disadvantages• Deaeration necessary
• High volumes of media
• Labor intensive
27
Apparatus 4 –Flow-through cell
Design• With paddle over disc, the transdermal patch is
placed between a glass disc and an inert PTFE (POLY TEFLON) mesh.
• This is placed at the bottom of the vessel, with the mesh facing upwards, under a rotating paddle.
• Unlike dissolution testing, transdermal testing is carried out at 32°C to reflect the lower temperature of the skin.
• USP 5 apparatus is made-up of borosilicate glass with a PTFE 17 mesh, held together by PTFE clips. Patches up to 90 mm in diameter can be tested.
28
Apparatus 5 –Paddle over disk
29
Apparatus 5 –Paddle over disk
Useful for• Transdermal patches
Standard volume• 900 ml
30
Apparatus 5 –Paddle over disk
Advantages• Standard equipment
(paddle) can be used, only add a stainless steel disk assembly
Disadvantages• Disk assembly restricts
patch size
The cylinder consists of two parts that fit together: the main shaft/cylinder assembly plus an extension. The extension is used when the transdermal patch requires a larger area
Same as apparatus 1,except to replace the basket and shaft with a S.S. cylinder stirring element.
Temperature - 32 ± 0.5° The dosage unit is placed on the cylinder. Distance between the inside bottom of the vessel and
cylinder is maintained at 25 ± 2 mm. Transdermal or patch testing is carried out .
31
Apparatus 6–Rotating cylinder
The assembly consists of a set of calibrated solution containers, a motor and drive assembly to reciprocate the system vertically.
Various type of sample holder are used The vessels are partially immersed in a suitable water-
bath of any convenient size that permits holding the temperature at 37 ± 0.5 °C during the test.
Cuprophan (Cellophane paper) is used for holding of semisolid dosage forms.
Useful for testing of extended release dosage forms, Osmotic pumps, Tablets, Ointments, Gels etc.
32
USP Apparatus 7-Reciprocating holder
33
Apparatus 6 – Rotating cylinder
USP apparatus 7 – Reciprocating holder
34
Type of Dosage Form Apparatus
Conventional solid oral dosage form
Basket, paddle, reciprocating cylinder or flow through cell
Oral suspension Paddle
Orally disintegrating tablet Paddle
Chewable tablet Basket, paddle, or reciprocating cylinder with glass beads
Transdermal patch
Paddle over disk
Suppositories Paddle, modified basket, or dual chamber flow through cell
conclusion
35
SummaryImmediate release dosage forms: apparatus 1 or 2 (preferably 2)
Controlled release dosage forms: apparatus 1 or 2 using different media for QC apparatus 3 or 4 for R&D purposes
Beside the selection of an adequate dissolution apparatus, adequate test conditions are crucial for all purposes !
36
Suggested readingFIP Guidelines for dissolution testing of solid oral products.Dissolution Technologies 4:5-14 (1997).SM Diebold, JB Dressman . Dissolved oxygen as a measure for de- and re-aeration of aqueous media for dissolution testing. Dissolution Technologies 5: 13-16 (1998).S Qureshi . Calibration – the USP dissolution apparatus suitability test.Drug Inf. J. 30, 1055-1061 (1996).N Kaniwaet al. Collaborative study on the development of a standard for evaluation of vibration levels for dissolution apparatus . Int. J. Pharm. 175: 119-129 (1998).VA Gray, CK, Brown, JB Dressman, LJ Leeson. A new general information chapter on dissolution . Pharmacopoeial Forum 27 (6) [Nov.-Dec. 2001]W Brown. General information <1092> The dissolution procedure: development and validation Pharmacopoeial Forum 30 (1) [Jan.-Feb. 2004]
37
QUESTIONS...........