Upload
j-barnes
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 150 (2008) S130
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A
j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r.com/ locate /cbpa
Society for Experimental Biology Annual Main Meeting6th – 10th July 2008, Marseille, France
A9 — NEUROBIOLOGY POSTER SESSION
A9.1Varying the sign and gain of optomotor feedback provides insightsinto mechanisms of course control in walking land crabs,Cardisoma guanhumi
J. Barnes (University of Glasgow); M. Macauley (University ofGlasgow); J. Neidhardt (University of Applied Sciences, Bremen);J. Layne (University of Cincinnati)
This study used a walking compensator consisting of a hollowstyrofoam ball supported on a cushion of air. The crab, held above theball, is unable to rotate or translate, but instead moves the ball underits feet. Visual stimuli, mimicking rotational optic flow, are generatedby computers and projected onto two screens that cover 240° of thecrab's visual field. Optical computer mice monitor movements of theball about all three axes, and the signals from ball rotation about avertical axis are fed back to the computers generating visual stimuli. In
this way, the visual consequences of turns can be fed back to the visualsystem, with experimenter control of gain and sign. Eye movementsare recorded using a capacitative position-sensing device. Thisapparatus was used to analyse the control systems that govern bothoptomotor body turns, used in course control, and compensatory eyemovements. Results demonstrate that the optomotor system has ahigh gain and long time constant. Thus, responses to sinusoidal visualinputs with positive rather than negative feedback do not, as might beexpected, simply generate body turns in the opposite direction to thevisual input. Instead, they are dominated by the direction of turningthat the crab initially makes, so that the turning movement isunidirectional and no longer follows the sinusoidal component of thevisual input. Modelling such responses using Simulink (a Matlabpackage) allows us to test different models of the control system.
doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.04.306