VARIOUS BOC/CCTP MEETING MATERIALS

8/13/2019 VARIOUS BOC/CCTP MEETING MATERIALS

1/51

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND CITIZENS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

Bond Oversight Committee333 S. Beaudry Avenue, 23rd Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90017(T) 213.241.5183(F) 213.241.8354 [email protected]

www.laschools.org/bond

Stephen English, ChairL.A. City Controllers Office

Pamela Schmidt, Vice-ChairEarly Education Coalition

Quynh Nguyen, SecretaryLAUSD Student Parent

Scott Folsom, Executive CommitteeTenth District PTSA

Stuart Magruder, Executive CommitteeAmerican Institute of Architects

Joseph P. Buchman Legal CounselBurke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP

Thomas A. Rubin, CPAOversight Committee Consultant

Bill Brewington Thirty-First District PTSAMaria Cabildo

LAUSD Student ParentPaul Escala

CA Charter School Association

Garrett FrancisAssoc. General Contractors of CA

Abigail MarquezL.A. City Mayors Office

Ron MillerL.A. Co. Federation of Labor AFL-CIO

John NaimoL.A. Co. Auditor-Controllers Office

Barry WaiteCA Tax Reform Assn.

Susan Linschoten(Alternate)L.A. Co. Auditor-Controllers Office

Elizabeth Lugo (Alternate)LAUSD Student Parent

Gary C. Anderson, PhDBond Administrator

Daniel HwangAdministrative Analyst

RESOLUTION 2013-33

BOARD REPORT NO. 129-13/14

COMMON CORE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT PHASE 2 AND PHASE 1L

WHEREAS, District staff is proposing the Board of Education adopt an amendment to theInformation Technology Division (ITD) Strategic Execution Plan (SEP) to define and approvePhases 1L and 2 of the Common Core Technology Project (CCTP); and

WHEREAS, Phases 1L and 2 are defined by District staff as follows:

Purchase and equip 24,541 students at 38 schools with tablet devices, preloadedcontent, protective cases, and warranties as shown in Attachment B.

Purchase and equip 48,741 physical keyboards in order to provide all grade 2-12students and half of the students in kindergarten and 1st grade at Phase 1 and 2schools for the purposes of a) accommodating completion of online adaptiveassessments, and b) providing comprehensive knowledge on the academicpossibilities of using physical keyboards in the classroom.

Purchase and equip 28,385 school-based administrators, teachers, and othercertificated staff at all remaining (non-Phase 1) LAUSD schools with a tablet device,protective case, preloaded content, warranties, and introductory professionaldevelopment.

Purchase and equip remaining (non Phase 1 or 2) schools with a total of 1,928storage/charging carts and 67,480 tablets with physical keyboards (35 per storagecart) as needed to participate fully in field tests of the Smarter Balanced AssessmentConsortium scheduled for Spring 2014. A detailed list of numbers of carts anddevices needed by schools is included in Attachment C.


2/51

RESOLUTION 2013-33


PAGE 2



Purchase and equip every teacher and student at seven non-Phase 1 or 2 high schoolswith laptop devices for the purpose of analyzing the effectiveness of laptops relativeto tablets as learning and assessment devices for high school students; and

WHEREAS, The BOC established its Information Technology Task Force (IT TF), consistingof five of its Members, in June of 2013, and the IT TF Members have devoted many hours tomeeting with staff, studying reports, visiting schools, attending CCTP training, meeting withstudents, parents, teachers, and principals, and using the Apple/Pearson devices, and

WHEREAS, the IT TF has met and considered the Phase 2 and Phase 1L staffrecommendation, and

WHEREAS, the IT TF, after deliberation and discussion, prepared and submitted to the BOCmembers on November 18, 2013 a written report which stated, among other things that none

of the members of the IT TF supported the staff recommendation and that a majority of the ITTF members supported a a scaled down roll-out of Phase 2 and 1L at this time, as described inthe IT TF Report, attached hereto, and

WHEREAS, The scaled down roll-out of Phase 2 and 1L recommended in the IT TF Report isa relatively small step that would enable the District to continue and better evaluate animportant program, and

WHEREAS, The selection of Phase 1 schools was driven in large part by considerationsrelating to the technological, i.e., digital wireless, capacity of the selected campuses and, inthe selection of Phase 2 schools the District has given more attention to fulfilling its obligation

to equity and access as mandated by the Office of Civil Rights consent agreement and theneed to understand and evaluate the impact of classroom technology modernization among awider spectrum of lower and higher performing schools, and

WHEREAS, Through the roll-out to 38 Phase 2 schools, the District will be able to apply thelessons learned in Phase 1 and better determine the extent to which it has improved itsoperating plan as a result of the Phase 1 experience, and through the roll-out to seven Phase1L high schools, the District will be better able to analyze the effectiveness of laptops relativeto tablets as learning and assessment devices for high school students, and

WHEREAS, on November 12, 2013 by Resolution of the Board of Education the District

determined, among other things, that

the District shall focus on Phase 1 and 2 of the Common Core Technology Projectduring academic years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015, and

the District will retain an evaluator to evaluate the use of iPads at Phase 1 and 2schools, to analyze and evaluate the many programs that are being conducted across


3/51

RESOLUTION 2013-33


PAGE 3



the District that involve other devices and supplemental and core curriculum, and toevaluate the use of laptops at Phase 1L schools, and

WHEREAS, the BOC understands that the Districts decision as to further implementation ofthe CCTP beyond Phases 1, 2 and 1L will be guided by the evaluation, and

WHEREAS, the BOC will consider the evaluation when it makes any furtherrecommendations concerning the implementation of the CCTP beyond Phases 1, 2 and 1L

WHEREAS, The estimated total investment for Phases 1L and 2 of CCTP, in accordance withthe modifications proposed in the IT TF Report, is approximately $45 million. This project isbeing undertaken as part of the School Upgrade Program (SUP), and as such will be fundedwith Bond Program Funds allocated to the Common Core Technology Project "Category ofNeed" identified in the SUP - Spending Targets;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The School Construction Bond Citizens Oversight Committee recommends thatthe Board of Education take the following actions with regard to District staffsproposal for Phases 1L and 2 of the CCTP as described in Board Report No. 129-13/14, a copy of which is attached hereto in the form it was presented to the BOC:

a. Do adopt an amendment to the ITD SEP to purchase and equip all students,teachers and school-based administrators at 38 schools with approximately26,000 tablet devices, as shown in Attachment B of Board Report No. 129-13/14.

b. Direct District staff to return to the BOC at the BOCs December monthlymeeting with additional information on how the 48,741 keyboards fortablet devices as shown in the staff report will be distributed and utilized.

c. Do notadopt an amendment to the ITD SEP to purchase and equip 28,385school-based administrators, teachers and other certified staff with tabletdevices.

d. Direct District staff to return to the BOC at an appropriate future date torequest the BOCs recommendations concerning any proposed use of bondfunds for the purchase of devices for advance distribution to principals and

students at some Phase 3 schools before the evaluation process iscompleted.

e. Do notadopt an amendment to the ITD SEP to purchase 68,470 tablets and1,928 carts to equip computer labs, libraries, and/or classrooms atapproximately 913 schools.


4/51

RESOLUTION 2013-33


PAGE 4



f. District staff should be directed to return to the BOC with arecommendation for tablets and carts to be used for the Smarter BalancedAssessment Consortium Field Test after staff performs a survey of District

schools and determines the needs that cannot be reasonably met thoughother means, including the use of existing computer labs; libraries; existinglaptop/tablet carts; schools sharing a campus, or nearby, sharing suchresources; and moving carts between schools during the six-week testingperiod.

g. Direct District staff to proceed to plan to purchase and equip every student,certificated employee, and other appropriate staff at up to seven non-Phase1 or 2 high schools, to be known as Phase 1L schools, with laptops andassociated software, equipment, and facilities changes as may be required;at an cost not to exceed $25 million for approximately 16,000 laptops andassociated equipment.

2. The BOC recommends that the evaluation of CCTP be modified to include therecommendations in the IT TF Report, most specifically to assign theresponsibility for the conduct of the report to the Office of Inspector General.

3. This resolution shall be transmitted to the Los Angeles Unified School DistrictBoard of Education and posted on the Bond Oversight Committees website.

4. That a written response as required by the Charter and Memorandum ofUnderstanding between the Oversight Committee and the Board be provided tothe Oversight Committee within 30 days, reporting either on action taken orproposed to be taken in response to this resolution and each recommendationherein.

ADOPTED on November 20, 2013 by the following vote:

AYES: 9 ABSTAIN: 0

NAYS: 4 ABSENT: 0

Stephen English Pamela SchmidtStephen English Pamela SchmidtChair Vice Chair

Attachment (BOC IT TF Report)


5/51

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND CITIZENS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

Bond Oversight Committee333 S. Beaudry Avenue, 23

rdFloor, Los Angeles, CA 90017Phone: 213. 241.5183Fax: 213.241.8354www.laschools.org/bond

Stephen English, ChairL.A. City Controllers Office

Pamela Schmidt, Vice-ChairEarly Education Coalition

Quynh Nguyen, SecretaryLAUSD Student Parent

Scott Folsom, Executive CommitteeTenth District PTSAStuart Magruder, Executive Committee

American Institute of Architects

Joseph P. Buchman Legal CounselBurke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP

Thomas A. Rubin, CPAOversight Committee Consultant

Bill Brewington Thirty-First District PTSAMaria Cabildo

LAUSD Student ParentPaul Escala

CA Charter School Association

Garrett FrancisAssoc. General Contractors of CAAbigail Marquez

L.A. City Mayors Office

Ron MillerL.A. Co. Federation of Labor AFL-CIO

John NaimoL.A. Co. Auditor-Controllers Office

Barry WaiteCA Tax Reform Assn.

Susan Linschoten(Alternate)L.A. Co. Auditor-Controllers OfficeElizabeth Lugo (Alternate)

LAUSD Student Parent

Gary C. Anderson, PhDBond Administrator

Daniel HwangAdministrative Analyst

BOC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TASK FORCE REPORT

November 18, 2013

TO: LAUSD School Construction Bond Citizens Oversight Committee

cc: Dr. Gary Anderson, Joseph Buchman, Thomas Rubin

FROM: BOC Information Technology Task Force

RE: The Districts Common Core Technology Project (CCTP) Phase 2 Proposal

A.Introduction

The BOC Information Technology Task Force (IT TF) is composed of five members of theSchool Construction Bond Citizens Oversight Committee (BOC): Steve English (the TaskForce Chair), Scott Folsom, John Naimo, Quynh Nguyen, and Stuart Magruder. The IT TF wasformed on June 19, 2013, by the BOC Chair as an ad hocsubcommittee of the BOC, anddirected to study the Districts proposals for implementation of Phase 2 of the Common CoreTechnology Project (CCTP) and to report back to the BOC with any findings andrecommendations when the District presented Phase 2 of the CCTP. Since it was established,the IT TF has met seven times, most recently on November 13, 2013.

During the IT TF meetings, each of which typically lasted several hours, the IT TF membersheard presentations from most District offices involved in the CCTP, questioned Districtrepresentatives extensively, and had lengthy and candid working discussions amongstthemselves and with BOC staff and counsel after District representatives had been excused fromthe room. In addition, IT TF members spent many hours individually in the study of District-

provided materials and in self-directed research. IT TF members also made many visits toschools that already had, or were undergoing transition to, digital education programs, talked


6/51

The Districts Common Core Technology Project (CCTP) Phase 2 Proposal

Page 2

with parents, teachers, principals, and students, and participated in CCTP training sessions.Three IT TF members also attended and participated in meetings of Board of Educationcommittees, specifically the BOEs Common Core Technology Project Committee; the Budget,Facilities and Audit Committee; and the Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Committee

wherein CCTP issues were extensively discussed.

In its investigations the IT TF pursued a multitude of inquiries, either directly or through BOCstaff, into a variety of subject areas, including the legal issues related to the use of bond fundsfor the tablets, pedagogy, actual device costs per unit, the Apple contract, student security,teacher and parent training, and post-implementation financing arrangements.

The IT TF has also had the benefit of the very extensive knowledge that the BOCs staff, and toa much lesser extent the BOCs Chair, have accumulated about the CCTP and related programssince September 2012 when the CCTP was first announced. Most notably, Mr. Rubin, Mr.

Buchman and the BOCs Chair have had numerous and extensive exchanges with the DistrictsSuperintendent, the Office of the General Counsel, the Deputy Superintendent of Instruction,the Common Core Technology Project office; the Office of the Chief Financial Officer, theInformation Technology Division, the Facilities Service Division, and the School Police. TheBOC Chair and Dr. Anderson also made a day-long visit to the Riverside Unified SchoolDistrict where they were taken by the Superintendant of that district to see a number of schoolsthat have implemented its take-home-device-for-every-student program.

Throughout this process the District has been responsive to our requests for information,although as will be seen in our Statement of Concerns and Recommendations for the CCTP, inSection C of this report below, there are still important questions that --in our view-- should bemore fully addressed before the District proceeds to a full scale implementation of its proposed$1 billion program. To its credit the District has also been responsive to many suggestions fromthe BOCs staff, particularly Mr. Rubin, and to a lesser extent the BOCs Chair, concerning theimplementation of the CCTP over the last 18 months. Most notably, at our suggestion theDistrict deferred its original district-wide implementation plans in favor of a phased roll outstarting with a relatively small number of schools, and it agreed to postpone the final decisionas to whether it should proceed with a full implementation until after the first phase was wellunderway. Also, the Districts current Five Year Plan for financing the CCTP owes much to Mr

Rubins detailed requests for long term financial information, although as we note below, anumber of financial questions should be more fully addressed before the District proceeds to afull scale implementation.

This report was written by the Task Force Chair. While it accurately reflects the IT TFsoperative conclusions with respect to the Districts proposal, the individual members of the taskforce do not necessarily concur in every aspect of the report, except as expressly stated herein


7/51


Page 3

B.Summary of District Proposal and Task Force Conclusions

When the IT TF was established, it was anticipated that the District would seek the BOCsapproval of plans for a full scale implementation of the CCTP starting in January 2014 at an

approximate implementation cost of $1 billion. Recently, however, the District has changedcourse, and it is now requesting that the BOC approve a greatly scaled back plan to proceedwith the project in the near future. The ultimate goal of a district-wide program remains thesame, but instead of asking for approval of a full scale implementation program now, theDistrict seeks for the near term only a modest expansion of the relatively small scale Phase Iimplementation that began last summer. In terms of bond funding this expansion, now referredto as the Phase 2 and 1L proposal, has four components:

(1) the purchase of approximately 25,000 tablets to equip 38 schools for Phase 2 of the CCTPduring the Spring Semester of the current academic year;

(2) the purchase of approximately 49,000 physical keyboards for all students in grades 2through 12 and half of the K-1 students at Phase 1 and 2 schools1;

(3) the purchase of approximately 28,000 tablets for principals and certified staff at allremaining (non-Phase 1) LAUSD schools by April 2014;

(4) the purchase of approximately 2,000 tablet carts and 67,000 tablets so that schools withinadequate technology can participate in field tests of a national Common Core assessment inthe coming Spring Semester; and

(5) the purchase of laptops sufficient to equip every teacher and student at seven non-Phase 1 or2 high schools with those devices in the Spring Semester for the purpose of analyzing theeffectiveness of laptops relative to tablets as learning and assessment devices for high schoolstudents. These seven high schools are referred to as Phase 1L schools.

The District has also extended its project implementation timeline to allow for a comprehensiveevaluation of the CCTP program to be based on information gathered from the Phase 1 andPhase 2 schools. The results of this evaluation will be reviewed by the District and the BOC

before the District proceeds with any further phases of the program. Although the Districts

proposal is not explicit on this point, we should insist that the BOC be provided with the resultsof the evaluation before the BOC is asked to approve the expenditure of bond funds for anyaspect of this project beyond Phase 2.

1This aspect of the Districts current proposal was not part of the Phase 2 plan submitted to theIT TF at its last meeting on November 13. Accordingly, this report does not address that aspectof the proposal.


8/51


Page 4

At its November 13 meeting the IT TF members agreed that the decision came down to threebasic alternatives:

Recommend approval of the Phase 2 and 1L proposal as presented;

Recommend against approval of any part of the Phase 2 and 1L proposal at this time;Recommend approval of a reduced version of the Phase 2 and 1L proposal.

After extensive discussion, the matter was put to a vote, with the following result:

Recommend approval of the Phase 2 and 1L proposal as presented: No votes

Recommend against approval of any part of the Phase 2 and 1L proposal at this time: Twovotes

Recommend approval of a reduced version of the Phase 2 and 1L proposal: Three votes

All of the IT TF members then agreed on the parts of the Phase 2 and 1L proposal that shouldnot be recommended for BOC approval at this time. The parts not recommended for approvalwere:

a. the purchase of approximately 28,000 tablets for principals and certified staff at allremaining (non-Phase 1) LAUSD schools by April 2014; and

b. the purchase of approximately 2,000 tablet carts and 67,000 tablets so that schools withinadequate technology can participate in field tests of a national Common Coreassessment in the coming Spring Semester.

The reasons for the IT TF recommendation against these parts of the Phase 2 and 1L proposalare set forth below in Section D of this report. It is important to note that the IT TF is notopposed to these parts of the proposal in concept; rather, it believes that

a. The proposed provision of tablets to principals and certified staff at all LAUSD schoolsby April 2014 is premature, and

b. As presented to the IT TF on November 13, the proposed provision of tablets and carts toevery school with inadequate technology so they can participate in national assessment

field tests in the coming Spring Semester is not sufficiently detailed.

It is the view of the IT TF that these negative aspects of the proposal may be remedied if theywere brought back to the BOC at an appropriate time and with appropriate detail.


9/51


Page 5

The Task Force unanimously concurred in the Statement Concerns and Recommendations inSection C,2but some members had additional concerns and recommendations beyond the onesstated there. We believe it is appropriate for those members to express their views on these

points at the BOC meeting on November 20. We also believe it is appropriate for all members

of the Task Force to express their views on these recommendations at the same meeting.

Accordingly we recommend that the BOC only approve two of the five proposed aspects of thePhase 2 implementation at this time (the addition of 38 schools and the parallel laptop

program). We express no opinion with respect to the proposed keyboard purchase because itwas not presented for our review. Also we support, but recommend some changes to, the

program evaluation provisions contained in the Board of Educations November 12 Resolutionconcerning the Phase 2 and 1L proposal. Those recommended changes are specified in Part C 1

below. A copy of the BOE Resolution is attached as an appendix to this report.

C.Statement of Concerns and Recommendations For the Common Core TechnologyProject

Our five month review of the Districts CCTP program, as proposed and as implementedthrough Phase 1, has given rise to a number of concerns, which is to be expected for a new

program of this scope and magnitude. Notwithstanding these concerns the members of the TaskForce have been positively impressed with many aspects of the program, and the great --

possibly revolutionary-- potential for technologically enhanced teaching and learning. We havenot undertaken to list the many positive aspects of the program in this report we will leavethat to the District and its professional educators so the absence of such a listing in this reportshould not be counted against the program. Rather, we list here only our concerns, which weunderstand to be our job.

1.Program Design.

We appreciate that District staff has done a remarkable job in overcoming many challengesand adeptly handling a great many of the complex aspects of CCTP planning andimplementation to date. Nevertheless, we are concerned that the academic and technicalaspects of the program have been hurriedly structured, and not completely worked through

and that reasonable alternative approaches have not been fully considered. To address thisconcern we recommend that the Board of Education transfer to the Office of the InspectorGeneral the responsibility for the evaluation process described in the BOEs November 12

2Except that paragraph 2, which pertains to certain legal questions, was with the consent of the

Task Force Members- drafted by the Task Force Chair and BOC counsel based in part onmaterials received from the District s General Counsel after the Task Forces last meeting on

November 13, 2013.


10/51


Page 6

Resolution (and the procurement process related thereto) as soon as possible. The InspectorGeneral should also be authorized to engage one or more independent consultants and

prepare with their assistance a comprehensive evaluation of the program to be delivered tothe Board of Education and the BOC no later than March 2015 (or such later date as the

Inspector General may propose) with recommendations as to whether and to what extent itwould be reasonable for the District to proceed with Phase 3 of the project, and whether andto what extent the plans for that Phase should be modified. We also recommend that within areasonable time in advance of the Inspector Generals report, the District should take thefollowing actions concerning the design of the program:

3

a.The District should study and report its findings with respect to the available options forselecting additional types of devices and educational software for CCTP, includingsoftware that is commonly utilized in the business and academic worlds such asMicrosoft Office.

b.The District should report its plan to allow individual schools and/or teachers to modifythe access filters on student devices to fulfill academic purposes.

c.The District should study and report its findings concerning the desirability and feasibilityof allowing students in the higher grade levels, to have a greater range of device optionsincluding take-home laptop devices instead of take-home tablets.

d.The District should study and report its findings concerning the desirability and feasibilityof loading onto each students device a digitized copy of that students textbooks (for

example in PDF format).

e.The District should develop and present its proposed policies and plans for students wholack internet access at home to assist such students families to acquire such access or toinsure that such students are not disadvantaged by the lack of internet access at home.

f.The District should study and report its findings concerning the feasibility of a bring-your-own-device option whereby (1) a variety of student and teacher owned devices areapproved for classroom use; (2) the contents of approved student and teacher owneddevices would be separated between, (i) LAUSD academic materials, which would be

under District controls similar to District-owned devices, and (ii) personal content, whichthe District would not control or have access to, except in specified extraordinary

3Subsequent to the IT TFs last meeting on November 13, 2013, the Districts Phase 2 andPhase 1L proposal was presented on November 16, 2013. Some of the recommended actions inthis list have been incorporated into that the Districts proposal.


11/51


Page 7

situations; and (3) the conditions for the use of software for personal applications and datapermitted on-campus would be specified.

g.The District should report its CCTP related plans for LAUSD Charter Schools, including,

but not limited to, its plans to support different options to charter schools, and its plans forthe sharing and exchange of CCTP curricular materials and best practices between charterschools and traditional schools.

h.The District should outline its plans for digital education in its early and adult educationprograms.

i.The District should study and provide a plan for training of and communication withteachers and parents, including: easily accessible feedback loop; continuing education

beyond initial rollout; and recommendations on healthy levels of screen time and how to

supervise appropriate usage.

2.Legal.

On November 15, 2013, after months of discussions with the Office of the General Counsel(OGC) and many requests for a legal opinion supporting the Districts use of bond fundsto pay for the majority of costs associated with the CCTP, the OGC issued a writtenreasoned memorandum opinion stating, among other things, that after performing its duediligence, including, but not limited to, conducting several telephone meetings with andreviewing past communications from the Districts bond counsel, in the OGCs opinion

there is legal support for the use of bond funds to purchase devices such as tablets for thepurpose of equipping schools with those devices, to purchase the software packages to beused on the devices, and to allow students, teachers and staff to take the devices home. Wefind this opinion acceptable. The IT TF remains concerned, however, that the law in this areais somewhat unsettled and that the purchase of these devices with bond funds, particularlyfor the purpose of replacing used, non-serviceable devices in 3-5 years, may not be

permissible under California or Federal law. To address this concern we recommend that theDistrict obtain an express and comprehensive reasoned opinion from the Districts bondcounsel confirming the propriety of using bond funds, not only for mobile learning devices

and educational software for CCTP purposes, but also for the cost of replacing these items inlater years. Or, alternatively, the District should obtain an Internal Revenue ServiceRevenue Ruling on the federal tax law aspects of the bond funding of CCTP-relatedexpenses.

3.Bond Repayment Schedule.

We are concerned that the repayment schedule for any bonds issued to finance the CCTP be


12/51


Page 8

reasonably related to the expected life of the assets acquired with the proceeds from suchbonds. While this fits with established District practice, we believe that an expressconfirmation of the Districts intent to follow that practice here would be helpful to the

public.

4.Bond Program Opportunity Cost.

We are concerned that the District has not calculated or analyzed the impact that the CCTPwould have on the Districts needs for other bond-funded projects. To address this need werecommend that:

a. The District study and report back to the BOC no later than 30 days in advance of its nextbond issuance concerning the impact of the bond-funded CCTP on the timing and theextent of non-CCTP bond-funded projects (we suggest that this be presented as a

schedule of the availability of bond funding for non-CCTP capital projects by time periodunder two alternative scenarios: (i) CCTP proceeds under the most recent plan at the timeof this analysis, or (ii) CCTP does not so proceed, but that non-CCTP enhancementscomprehended by the Measure Q plan in 2008, as updated, are included); and

b. The District adopt a School Upgrade Program in the near future sufficient to allow theDistrict to proceed with planning, design, and execution of school modernization projectsfor the next three years.

5.Pearson Materials.

We are concerned that the District has not yet received and reviewed all of the Pearsonlessons for which it has contracted, nor has it been made clear to us whether the District isentitled to receive and use all of these lessons if it orders less than a set number of Appledevices. To address these concerns we recommend as follows:

a. The IT TF has been advised that the Pearson contract for the second semester will becomplete on January 1, 2014. We request that the District obtain and review all of thePearson lessons for which it has contracted no later than March 1, 2014; and

b. As soon as possible District should clarify, and if necessary renegotiate, theApple/Pearson contract to specify that the District will have access to the full range ofPearsons CCTP curricular materials on district-purchased Apple devices when they areneeded regardless of the number of devices the District elects to purchase in the future.

6.Post Implementation Costs.


13/51


Page 9

We are concerned that the District does not have a clear and realistic funding plan for thedistrict-wide implementation of this project beyond the initial rollout. To address thisconcern we recommend that before proceeding to Phase 3 the District augment its CCTPFive Year Plan so that it includes:

a.A clear statement of the projected total and continuing annual and cyclical post-implementation costs of the CCTP including, but not limited to, the costs of (1) replacingused, non-serviceable devices in three to five years, and (2) the electronic curricularmaterial the District will be acquiring to use for subjects not covered in the material to beacquired from Pearson under the present contract, and to replace or update the Pearsonmaterial when its current license to that material expires;

b.More comprehensive, realistic provisions for covering the costs referred to insubparagraph a above, with year-by-year detailing showing the funds that will be available

for non-CCTP expenditures with and without CCTP implementation.

c.An analysis of the anticipated change in the amounts now spent for the purchase oftraditional textbooks and digital media currently available outside of the CCTP; and

d.An analysis of the effect of the proposed CCTP implementation on e-rate funding andspending.

D.Recommendations Concerning the Districts Proposal for Our November 20 Meeting

As set forth in Section 7.6 of our Memorandum of Understanding with the District, it is theBOCs responsibility to recommend against the expenditure of bond funds whena project orfamily of projects appears to be impermissible or imprudent. Although we do not find that any

part of the Districts Phase 2 and Phase 1L proposal is impermissible, several parts of thatproposal, as presented, seem to us to be imprudent.

Imprudence in our view is something about which reasonable men and women should be able toagree and take the necessary steps to avoid. Thus, if reasonable men and women disagree as towhether one course of action or another should be followed, it is possible that neither course isimprudent. Accordingly, it is not the role of the BOC to substitute its judgment for the judgment

of the District or the Board of Education on questions where reasonable men and women mightbe expected to disagree. Rather, when we recommend against a proposal because it isimprudent, we do so because we have determined that it is so inadvisable that reasonable menand women would generally agree that the proposal should be disapproved.


14/51


Page 10

With respect to the specific aspects of the Districts Phase 2 and Phase 1L proposal,4our

determinations are as follows:

1. The proposed purchase of approximately 25,000 tablets to equip 38 schools for Phase 2 of the

CCTP is not impermissible or imprudent. This is a relatively small step that would enable theDistrict to continue and better evaluate an important program. The selection of Phase 1 schoolswas driven in large part by considerations relating to the technological, i.e., digital wireless,capacity of the selected campuses. In the selection of Phase 2 schools the District has givenmore attention to fulfilling its obligation to equity and access as mandated by the Office of CivilRights consent agreement, and the need to understand the impact of classroom technologymodernization among a wider spectrum of lower and higher performing schools. Also, throughthe Phase 2 rollout the District will be able to apply the lessons learned in Phase 1 and betterdetermine the extent to which it has improved its operating plan as a result of the Phase 1experience.

2. We urge the BOC to recommend against the proposed Phase 2 purchase of 48,741 tablets forremaining principals and certificated staff at all LAUSD campuses by April. A purchase ofthat magnitude seems imprudent. We appreciate that it may be useful for devices to bedistributed to principals and teachers some months ahead of the time when they are to be givento students. Nevertheless, under the Districts current CCTP timeline, schools in Phase 3 maynot get student devices until September 2015, and a large number may not get student devicesuntil September 2016. If the District would like to use bond funds for the purchase of devicesfor advance distribution to principals and students at some Phase 3 schools before the

evaluation process discussed in C.1 above is completed, we suggest that it apply to the BOC forits recommendations concerning that purchase at an appropriate future date.

3. We urge the BOC to recommend against the proposed Phase 2 purchase of 1,928storage/charging carts and 67,480 tablets at this time. A purchase of that magnitude seemsimprudent. The District has said that this purchase is needed so that schools with inadequatetechnology can participate in the field tests of Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortiumscheduled for Spring 2014. It is clear the District must participate in the test, but we questionthe calculation of the number of devices needed. It may be correct, but it has not beenadequately explained to us. Nor does it appear that the District has considered how the size of

the proposed purchase might be reasonably reduced through alternative steps such as the use ofexisting computer lab and library facilities, the use of existing facilities of other schools on co-located and nearby campuses, and the movement of devices between campuses during the

4We made no determination concerning the proposed purchase of keyboards for Phase 1 andPhase 2 schools because that proposal was not presented to us as of November 13, the date ofour last meeting.


15/51


Page 11

multi-week testing period. We suggest that the District reapply to the BOC at its next meetingwith a well-supported proposal for a reasonably sized purchase of carts and devices sufficient toenable the District to fully participate in the field tests of Smarter Balanced AssessmentConsortium scheduled for Spring 2014. Considering that Phase 1, Phase 1L and Phase 2 schools

will already be equipped for that assessment, and that the Phase 3 rollout may not occur untilSeptember 2015, after the District has made an extensive evaluation of the entire program, wesuggest the District consider whether and to what extent it is prudent for the tablets purchased toenable participation in the assessment be loaded with Pearson educational content at this time.

4. The proposal to equip seven non-Phase 1 or Phase 2 high schools with laptops for the purposeof analyzing the effectiveness of laptops relative to tablets as learning and assessment devicesfor high school students is not impermissible or imprudent. It appears to be a modest step thatwould enable the District to continue and better evaluate an important program. Nevertheless,we have not been advised concerning the number of devices needed for this purpose or whetherthe proposal includes a reasonable amount of funding for other related costs, such as the

provision of electrical power to desks, or additional batteries. We expect that this informationcan be provided to the BOC in time for its November 20 meeting.

In conclusion we wish to thank the many District staff members who have devoted many hoursto providing the information we nave needed in our work. We have been much impressed bythe dedication of these staff members. And we are very grateful for the opportunity to advise theBOC on these questions of great importance to the District, its students, teachers, support andadministrative staff, parents and taxpayers.

Report Submitted bythe Chair of the BOC Information Technology Task Force


16/51


Page 12

APPENDIX

BOARD OF EDUCATION CCTP RESOLUTION

NOVEMBER 12, 2013

Ms. Ratliff Student Success Through an Evaluation-Based Common Core Technology Project

Now, be it

Resolved, That the Los Angeles Unified School District shall focus on Phase 1 and 2 of theCommon Core Technology Project during academic years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. Allnecessary policies, protocols, and practices related to the technology project shall be determinedduring Phase 1 and 2, including parental liability, the development of effective parent trainingmodules geared to each school span (elementary, middle and high school), and a detailed

procedure for school-based decision-making regarding whether to allow students to take thedevices home (with the inclusion of a parental opt-out provision). The Governing Board of theLos Angeles Unified School District directs the Superintendent to bring the abovementioned

policies, protocols and practices to the Board for review prior to the conclusion of Phase 2;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to purchase a keyboard for everyPhase 1 and 2 high school student, middle school student, and 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6thgrader thatneeds one to better inform us of the academic possibilities provided by keyboards and to allowthe keyboards to be used during testing. The Superintendent shall go before the Bond Oversight

Committee as necessary and appropriate regarding this clause within 45 days, and return to theBoard in no less than 65 days with the necessary funding/allocation details for implementation;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to contract with an evaluator toevaluate the use of iPads at Phase 1 and 2 schools, to analyze and evaluate the many programsthat are being conducted across the District that involve other devices and supplemental andcore curriculum, such as the use of laptops for students at Ivanhoe Elementary School, the useof Springboard supplemental curriculum at Francis Polytechnic High School, the use of GoogleChromebooks at KIPP charter middle schools in South Los Angeles and East Los Angeles, andthe use of ST Math at several schools; and to evaluate the use of laptops at Phase 1L schoolsdescribed in the following Resolved;

Resolved further, That in light of the fact that our ninth graders are now responsible for meetingthe A-G college entrance requirements with a C grade or better, the Board directs theSuperintendent to establish a separate pilot program, Phase 1L, which shall be developed inconjunction with key stakeholders, particularly parents, for up to seven non-Phase 1 and 2 highschools which shall serve as Phase 1L schools. Participation shall be voluntary and limited to


17/51


Page 13

one high school per Board District. Office of Civil Rights consent decree high schools shall beencouraged to participate. The Phase 1L schools shall provide a laptop to every teacher andstudent; the laptop may go home if the parents agree; the program shall include Common Corealigned software in ELA and mathematics chosen by teachers and administrators at the school

site; and Phase 1L shall include information regarding all free Wi-Fi locations in the schoolneighborhood and an investigation regarding the feasibility, cost, and possible benefit of

providing home Wi-Fi access or subsidized home Wi-Fi access. The Board can then comparethe lessons learned in iPad Phase 1 and 2 high schools with Phase 1L high schools as we moveinto future phases. The Superintendent shall go before the Bond Oversight Committee asnecessary and appropriate regarding this clause within 45 days, and return to the Board in noless than 65 days with the necessary funding/allocation details for implementation;

Resolved further, That the Superintendent provide the District and Board with an evaluation in

the 2013-2014 academic school year, or some portion of the next school year as determined bythe evaluator, related to Phase 1 and 2 comparing the 47 Phase 1 and 2 iPad schools, the Districtschools that use other forms of technology and supplemental and/or curriculum and the Phase1L schools in the pilot described in Resolved 4. The District shall use the information learnedfrom the evaluations to draft well-crafted, data-driven next phases that may or may not be acontinuation of the Apple/Pearson contract and that may or may not involve devices in additionto iPads, if the research shows other devices are the best technology for our students at

particular grades levels or schools;

Resolved further, That the contract and contract evaluation process be undertaken through the

appropriate vehicles;

Resolved further, That the Superintendent be authorized to submit the Common CoreTechnology Plan, as outlined in Board Report 71-13/14 and revised to include the provisions ofthis Resolution, to the Citizens Bond Oversight Committee; and, be it finally

Resolved, That the Administration, Office of General Counsel, and the Board undertake aquality review of the current Apple contract and bring all recommended revisions and edits tothe Board for consideration as deemed appropriate.


18/51

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTBoard of Education Report

Bd. of Ed Rpt No. 129-13/14 Page 1 of 34 Board of EducationDecember 10, 2013

Report Number: 129-13/14Date: December 10, 2013

Subject: Common Core Technology Project Phase 2 and Phase 1L

Responsible Staff:

Dr. John E. Deasy, Superintendent of SchoolsDr. Jaime R. Aquino, Deputy Superintendent of InstructionMatt Hill, Chief Strategy OfficerRon Chandler, Chief Information OfficerMark Hovatter, Chief Facilities Executive

Name

Office/Division Office of the Deputy Superintendent of InstructionTelephone No. 213-241-4822

BOARD REPORT

Action Proposed: Amendment to the Information Technology Division (ITD) StrategicExecution Plan (SEP) to define and approve Phases 1L and 2 of theCommon Core Technology Project (CCTP), defined as follows:

Purchase and equip 24,541 students at 38 schools with tablet devices,preloaded content, protective cases, and warranties as shown inAttachment B.

Purchase and equip 48,741 physical keyboards in order to provide allgrade 2-12 students and half of the students in kindergarten and 1stgrade at Phase 1 and 2 schools for the purposes of a) accommodatingcompletion of online adaptive assessments, and b) providingcomprehensive knowledge on the academic possibilities of usingphysical keyboards in the classroom.

Purchase and equip 28,385 school-based administrators, teachers, andother certificated staff at all remaining (non-Phase 1) LAUSD schoolswith a tablet device, protective case, preloaded content, warranties,and introductory professional development.

Purchase and equip remaining (non Phase 1 or 2) schools with a totalof 1,928 storage/charging carts and 67,480 tablets with physicalkeyboards (35 per storage cart) as needed to participate fully in fieldtests of the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium scheduled forSpring 2014. A detailed list of numbers of carts and devices neededby schools is included in Attachment C.

Purchase and equip every teacher and student at seven non-Phase 1 or2 high schools with laptop devices for the purpose of analyzing theeffectiveness of laptops relative to tablets as learning and assessmentdevices for high school studentsidentified asPhase 1L schools.


19/51



Authorize the Superintendent or designee to execute all instrumentsnecessary to implement Phase 1L of the CCTP pursuant to California

Public Contract Code Sections 20118.1and/or 20111.

Background: The proposed actions will enable the District to comply with the Board ofEducations directive to implement a second phase of the Common CoreTechnology Project (CCTP), advancing efforts to modernize classroomsto prepare students to master Common Core State Standards andproficient use of digital learning technology, equip educators with tools toadvance student learning in the classroom, and further close the digitaldivide between those students who have and do not have access to themost advanced learning tools available.

These actions will also enable the District to evaluate and analyze theimpact of deploying multiple classes of classroom technologies therebyincreasing understanding of how to modernize classrooms to maximizestudents potential for learning in the most efficient and cost effective waypossible.

Several factors drove the selection of schools to include in Phases 1L and2, including, but not limited to, further meeting the Districts obligationsto commit to equity and access as mandated by the Office for Civil Rights(OCR) consent agreement, the need to understand the impact of classroomtechnology modernization among a wider spectrum of lower and higher

performing schools, and the need to prepare for a technology-enabledlearning environment that can accommodate a wide range of differentdevices.

It is important to note that in addition to the investment of capital fundsneeded to advance this project, there is an impact on the General Fund thatis estimated to be $548,978 for Phase 1 (2013-14) and $11,200,000 (2014-15). In addition, we are working with Bond Counsel to determine if anyadditional phase 1 and 2 expenditures have a General Fund impact in2013-14 (details of these estimates are included in Attachment D).

Expected Outcomes: Approval of the proposed action and the subsequent investment inPhases 1L and 2 of CCTP, which will begin immediately uponapproval.

Board Options and

Consequences:

Supports the Districts revised plan issued prior to submission to the BondOversight Committee.


20/51



Policy Implications: This action is consistent with the District's long-term goal to addressunmet school facilities needs as described in Measures R, Y and Q.

Budget Impact:

Bond Oversight

Committee

Recommendations:

The estimated total investment for Phases 1L and 2 of CCTP is$134,934,915. This project is being undertaken as part of the SchoolUpgrade Program (SUP), and as such will be funded with Bond ProgramFunds allocated to the Common Core Technology Project "Category ofNeed" identified in the SUP - Spending Targets.

This item was considered by the School Construction Bond CitizensOversight Committee (BOC) at its meeting of November 20, 2013. TheBOC's adopted resolution, including the vote of the Committee, will beforwarded under separate cover.

Staff has concluded that this proposed ITD-SEP amendment will facilitateimplementation of the SEP, and therefore, it will not adversely affect theDistricts ability to successfully complete the SEP.

Attachments:

Informative

Desegregation

Impact Statement

Common Core Technology Project Phase 1L/2 Budget - Attachment A Common Core Technology Project Phase 2 List of Schools -

Attachment B Common Core Technology Project Phase 2 List of Numbers of Carts

and Devices Needed for Non Phase 1 and 2 Schools - Attachment C Detailed Estimates of Impact to the General Fund in 2013-14 and

2014-15- Attachment D

None.

N/A


21/51



Respectfully submitted, APPROVED BY:

DR. JOHN E. DEASY MICHELLE KINGSuperintendent Senior Deputy Superintendent

School Operations

REVIEWED BY:

APPROVED & DAVID HOLMQUISTPRESENTED BY: General Counsel

Approved as to form.

JAIME R. AQUINO, PH.D. TONY ATIENZADeputy Superintendent Director of Budget Services andOffice of the Deputy and Financial PlanningSuperintendent of Instruction

Approved as to budget impact statement

Matt Hill

Chief Strategy Officer Ronald S. ChandlerOffice of the Superintendent Chief Information OfficerInformation Technology Division

Mark HovatterChief Facilities ExecutiveFacilities Services Division


22/51



ATTACHMENT A

Itemized Funding Needs to Implement Phases 1L and 2

Item Amount

Individual Computing Devices $104,279,165

Device Carts $7,000,529

Learning Management System $1,646,453

Mobile Device Management $654,242

Security $1,760,000

Staffing $16,303,431Contingency (2.5%) $3,291,095

TOTAL $134,934,915


23/51



ATTACHMENT B - Schools Selected for Phase 2 of the Common Core Technology Project

Location School Name BD ESC Number of Devices3959 42nd St EL 1 ISIC 282

3795 59th St EL 1 WEST 394

6644 74th St EL 1 WEST 364

8028 Audubon MS 1 WEST 597

8075 Burroughs MS 1 WEST 1,342

2945 Century Pk EL 1 WEST 417

3178 Coliseum EL 1 ISIC 254

8245 Johnnie L Cochran Jr MS 1 WEST 977

8236 Mann MS 1 ISIC 449

6158 Purche EL 1 South 426

4301 Griffin EL 2 South 5674616 Humphreys EL 2 South 648

4982 Los Angeles EL 2 South 810

5438 Murchison EL 2 South 512

6370 Rosemont EL 2 South 503

2269 Balboa G/HA Mag 3 ISIC 748

2753 Canoga Park EL 3 North 825

4110 Gault EL 3 North 412

6315 Riverside Drive Charter Sch 3 North 611

6699 Sherman Oaks Elem Chrtr Sch 3 North 859

7123 Bradley Global Awareness Mag 4 WEST 410

5014 Loyola Village EL 4 WEST 140

8493 Wright Eng & Design Magnet 4 WEST 654

4986 Los Feliz EL 5 South 399

8268 Nimitz MS 5 ISIC 1,707

2378 Nueva Vista EL 5 South 973

6493 San Pascual EL 5 South 200

7589 Wadsworth EL 5 South 729

4055 Garden Grove EL 6 North 443

6068 Pinewood EL 6 North 337

5016 Sara Coughlin Elem School 6 North 715

8090 Carnegie MS 7 South 8828112 Drew MS 7 ISIC 925

8727 King/Drew Med Mag 7 South 1,615

8352 Peary MS 7 South 1,257

2925 Celerity Nascent Charter School 1 ISIC 594

8654 Crenshaw Arts-Technology CHS (CATCH) 1 WEST 209

7756 Westside Innovative School House (WISH) 4 WEST 355

Grand Total 24,541


24/51



ATTACHMENT C

List of Numbers of Storage/Charging Carts, Tablets, and

Keyboards needed for Non Phase 1 and Phase 2 Schools

Summary

Population to be Tested(includes Grades 3-8, 11; and9-10 for interim assessments)

CartsNeeded*

Total Number ofDevices (withKeyboards) inCarts of 35

Phase 1 23,080 0

Phase 2 18,316 0

Other 382,456 1,928 67,480

*Based on calculation of 2 test hours/device; ELA and Math for total test

hours of 8 per student over a six week window. Formula = # of students x 8test hours/student 30 test days 2 test hrs/device per day.

School L ist

School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Leichman Sp Ed Ctr 200 1

J Miller Career/Transition 247 1

Widney HS 199 1

Riley HS-Cyesis 157 1

Mc/Alister HS-Cyesis 184 1

Lanterman HS 203 1

Banneker Sp Ed Ctr 207 1

Carlson Hsp Sch(K-12 310 2

Lokrantz Sp Ed Ctr 109 1

Lowman Sp Ed Ctr 145 1

Marlton School 222 1

McBride Sp Ed Ctr 76 1

Perez Sp Ed Ctr 320 2

Salvin Sp Ed Ctr 218 1

Ctr Adv Transition Skills 180 1

Willenberg Sp Ed Ctr 203 1

Lull Sp Ed Ctr 118 1

Albion Elementary 157 1


25/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Aldama EL 338 2

Alexandria EL 315 2

Harvard Elementary School 269 2

Allesandro EL 115 1

Allesandro Coop Lrn Mg 115 1

Alta Loma EL 292 2

Amestoy EL 341 2

Amestoy Trilingual Mg 71 1

AnatoLA EL 241 1

Andasol EL 203 1

Angeles Mesa EL 220 1

Studio School 64 1

Ann EL 57 1

Annandale EL 176 1

Apperson EL 238 1

Aragon EL 216 1

Arlington Hts EL 330 2

Arminta EL 272 2

Ascot EL 450 2

Atwater EL 213 1Avalon Gardens EL 193 1

Acad for Enriched Sciences 158 1

Bandini EL 204 1

George De La Torre Jr. ES 378 2

Obama Elementary School 318 2

Porter Ranch Comm School 553 3

Playa Vista Elementary Sch 98 1

Lee Medical Health Science Magnet El Sch 209 1

Ride Elementary School:A SMArT Academy 244 1

Willow Elementary School 258 1

South Region ES #10 262 1

South Region ES #11 310 2

Dr L H Moore Mth/Sc/Tch Aca 403 2

Barton Hill EL 398 2

Bassett EL 391 2

Beachy EL 278 2

Beckford Chtr Enrichd Studs 297 2


26/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Beethoven EL 170 1

Ambassador Sc for Global Ed 200 1

Ellen Ochoa Learning Center 1028 4

Hughes EL 400 2

Hughes Math/Sci Mag #22 125 1

Maywood Elementary School 238 1

Esperanza EL School 357 2

Politi EL 369 2

Gratts LA for YS 472 2

Frank Del Olmo Elem School 351 2

Huntington Park Elem School 287 2

Olympic Primary Center 10 1

Lake Street Primary School 16 1

Belvedere EL 481 2

Bertrand EL 179 1

Blythe EL 219 1

Bonita EL 280 2

Braddock Drive EL 138 1

Braddock ES G/HG/Hi Ablty 81 1

Brainard EL 102 1Breed EL 262 1

Brentwood Sci Mag 770 3

Bridge EL 175 1

Broad Ave EL 393 2

Broadway EL 117 1

Charles White Elem School 213 1

Lafayette Park Primary Ctr 0 0

MacArthur Park ES-Visual&PA 196 1

Brockton EL 154 1

Brooklyn Ave EL 401 2

Bryson EL 326 2

Bryson EL Math/Sci/Tech 101 1

Buchanan EL 208 1

Buchanan Mth/Sci Mag 85 1

Budlong EL 447 2

Wilshire Park Elem School 282 2

Burbank EL 184 1


27/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Saturn EL 227 1

Burton EL 220 1

Bushnell Way EL 215 1

Elementary CDS 12 1

Cabrillo EL 203 1

Cahuenga EL 313 2

Charles H Kim ES 331 2

Calabash Charter Academy 202 1

Calahan Community Charter 286 2

Calvert Charter for Enriched Studies 187 1

Camellia EL 384 2

Canfield EL 220 1

Community Magnet Charter Sc 259 1

Cantara EL 299 2

Canterbury EL 360 2

Canterbury G/HA Mag 167 1

Canyon EL 197 1

Capistrano EL 201 1

Caroldale Lrng Comm 650 3

Carpenter Community Center 463 2Carson EL 342 2

Carthay Center EL 165 1

Castelar EL 318 2

Castle Hts EL 281 2

Castlebay Ln EL 355 2

Catskill EL 308 2

Carson-Gore Aca of Env Stds 315 2

Estrella Elementary School 259 1

Quincy Jones Elementary Sch 177 1

Dolores Huerta Elem School 220 1

Chandler Learning Academy 294 2

Chapman EL 213 1

Charnock Road EL 201 1

Chase EL 333 2

Chatsworth Park Elementary 203 1

Cheremoya EL 150 1

Cienega EL 344 2


28/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

City Terrace EL 213 1

Clifford EL 76 1

Clover EL 276 2

Cohasset EL 264 2

Coldwater Cyn EL 387 2

Colfax EL 334 2

Commonwealth EL 432 2

Compton EL 185 1

Madison Elementary School 310 2

Corona EL 629 3

Martha Escutia PC 0 0

Plasencia EL 269 2

Plasencia Mat/Sc Mag 108 1

Crescent Hts ES L/A/S/J Mag 211 1

Crestwood St EL 274 2

Westside Leadership Magnet 327 2

Christopher Dena EL 325 2

Dahlia Hts EL 231 1

Danube EL 239 1

Darby Avenue Charter 274 2Dayton Heights EL 310 2

Dearborn EL 270 2

Del Amo EL 211 1

Delevan Drive EL 284 2

Denker EL 394 2

Carmen Lomas Garza PC 0 0

Dixie Canyon EL 351 2

Dolores EL 310 2

Dominguez EL 275 2

Dorris Place EL 172 1

Dyer EL 378 2

Mid-City's PS-Enriched Sci 166 1

Eagle Rock EL 383 2

Eagle Rock HG EL Mag 52 1

Eagle Rock G/HA EL Mag 126 1

Eastman EL 544 3

El Dorado EL 304 2


29/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

El Oro EL 259 1

Elizabeth Learning Ctr 1335 6

El Sereno EL 246 1

Maurice Sendak ES 269 2

Elysian Heights EL 129 1

Rosa Parks Learning Center 362 2

Bellingham Elementary School 249 1

Emelita Academy Charter 230 1

Enadia EL 93 1

Encino EL 287 2

Erwin EL 362 2

Eshelman EL 317 2

Euclid EL 317 2

Euclid G/HA BIL Mag 186 1

Evergreen EL 477 2

Fair EL 495 2

Fairburn EL 212 1

Farmdale EL 272 2

Fernangeles EL 350 2

15th St EL 277 252nd St EL 423 2

Figueroa EL 343 2

Broadous EL 307 2

Broadous Math/Sc Mag 83 1

1st EL 433 2

Fishburn EL 313 2

Fletcher Dr EL 232 1

Florence EL 452 2

Ford Blvd EL 722 3

49th St EL 417 2

4th St EL 519 2

Franklin EL 244 1

Fries EL 274 2

Danny J Bakewell Sr PC 0 0

Fullbright EL 245 1

Gardena EL 274 2

Gardner EL 235 1


30/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Garvanza EL 227 1

Gates EL 378 2

Germain EL 260 1

Glassell Park EL 255 1

Gledhill EL 135 1

Gledhill Math/Sci Mag 166 1

Glen Alta EL 161 1

Glenfeliz Blvd EL 203 1

Glenwood EL 232 1

Graham EL 410 2

Granada Community Charter 216 1

Grand View EL 273 2

Grant EL 345 2

Grape EL 326 2

Gridley EL 356 2

Gulf EL 376 2

Arroyo Seco Museum Science 373 2

Haddon EL 416 2

Halldale EL 293 2

Hamlin EL 216 1William R Anton ES 500 2

Hancock Park EL 364 2

Harbor City EL 290 2

Harding EL 256 1

Harrison EL 289 2

Hart St EL 394 2

Haskell EL 162 1

Haskell Math/Sci Mag 171 1

Hawaiian EL 339 2

Haynes EL 206 1

Hazeltine EL 353 2

Heliotrope EL 393 2

Herrick EL 305 2

Hesby Oaks School 412 2

Hillside EL 172 1

Hobart Blvd EL 479 2

Holmes EL 195 1


31/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Hooper EL 567 3

Hooper Avenue Primary Ctr 0 0

Hoover EL 371 2

Hubbard EL 392 2

Huntington Dr EL 291 2

Walnut Park School 442 2

San Antonio EL 281 2

San Antonio M/Sc Mag 79 1

Pacific Boulevard School 386 2

Ivanhoe EL 221 1

Harmony Elementary School 375 2

Aurora Elementary School 244 1

Justice EL 202 1

Kennedy EL 242 1

Kenter Canyon EL 270 2

Kester EL 298 2

Kester G/HA Mag 184 1

Kittridge EL 369 2

Knollwood EL 200 1

Lanai EL 253 1Lane EL 222 1

Langdon EL 293 2

Prmry Acdmy For Success Sc 0 0

Lankershim EL 221 1

La Salle EL 224 1

Lassen 271 2

Latona EL 140 1

Laurel EL 260 1

Leland EL 323 2

Lemay EL 195 1

Liberty EL 296 2

Liggett EL 378 2

Lillian EL 334 2

Limerick EL 413 2

Lockhurst EL 169 1

Lockwood EL 366 2

Logan EL 344 2

Loma Vista EL 439 2


32/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Lomita Math/Sci Mag 565 3

Lorena EL 338 2

Loreto EL 192 1

Lorne EL 56 1

Lorne Math/Sci Mag 311 2

Pio Pico MS 635 3

Mariposa-NABI Primary Ctr 9 1

Loyola Per Arts Mag 159 1

Magnolia EL 564 3

Main St EL 398 2

Malabar EL 433 2

Dr T Alexander Jr Sci CS 298 2

Dr James Edward Jones PC 0 0

John W Mack Elem School 204 1

Marianna EL 236 1

Orchard Academies #2B 462 2

Orchard Academies #2C 458 2

Marquez EL 303 2

Lexington Avenue PC 0 0

Nava LA-Sch of Bus & Tech 503 2Marvin EL 324 2

Marvin Dual Lang Mag 140 1

Mar Vista EL 318 2

Walnut Park MS STEM 522 2

Mayall EL 222 1

Mayberry EL 186 1

Melrose EL M/S/T 193 1

Melvin EL 253 1

Menlo EL 317 2

Micheltorena EL 131 1

Middleton EL 788 4

Middleton Primary Center 0 0

Miles EL 446 2

Miles Math/Sci Bil Mag 139 1

Miller EL 461 2

Miramonte EL 536 3

Monlux EL 225 1

Monlux Math/Sci Mag 197 1


33/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Monte Vista EL 383 2

Richard Riordan Primary Ctr 7 1

Morningside EL 374 2

Mountain View EL 178 1

Mt Washington EL 185 1

Multnomah EL 133 1

Multnomah HG Mag 67 1

Multnomah Env Sc Mag 78 1

Napa EL 260 1

Nestle EL 256 1

Nevin EL 307 2

Newcastle ES 204 1

9th Street EL 84 1

95th St EL 468 2

99th St EL 318 2

92nd St EL 488 2

Charles W Barrett EL 541 3

96th St EL 508 2

93rd St EL 587 3

Noble EL 431 2Panorama City Elementary 247 1

Normandie EL 445 2

Normont EL 230 1

Norwood EL 363 2

O Melveny EL 291 2

118th St EL 288 2

186th St EL 415 2

Flournoy EL 238 1

Flournoy Math/Sci Mag 76 1

156th St EL 242 1

153rd St EL 188 1

109th St EL 229 1

Florence G Joyner EL Sc 314 2

107th St EL 382 2

107th St Math/Sci Mag 70 1

116th St EL 227 1

135th St EL 419 2

112th St EL 216 1


34/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

122nd St EL 353 2

Open Charter School 222 1

Osceola EL 184 1

Overland EL 236 1

Oxnard EL 231 1

Pacific Palisades EL 265 2

Palms EL 232 1

Park Ave EL 327 2

Park Western EL 196 1

Harbor M/Sc G/HA Mag 195 1

Parmelee EL 520 2

Parthenia EL 296 2

Paseo Del Rey Nat Sc Mg 286 2

Plainview Academic Chtr Aca 181 1

Playa Del Rey EL 107 1

Plummer EL 557 3

Point Fermin ES Marine Sci Mag 128 1

Pomelo Community Chrtr Sch 350 2

President EL 263 2

Purche ES Science/Tech 76 1Queen Anne EL 165 1

Ramona EL 432 2

Kingsley Elementary School 269 2

Ranchito EL 232 1

Raymond Ave 241 1

Reseda EL 209 1

Richland EL 111 1

Hamasaki EL 267 2

Rio Vista EL 195 1

Ritter EL 163 1

Rockdale EL 156 1

Coeur D Alene EL 223 1

Roscoe EL 375 2

Roscomare EL 209 1

Rosewood EL 148 1

Rowan EL 615 3

Amanecer Primary Center 0 0

Russell EL 404 2


35/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Russell G/HA Mag 105 1

San Fernando EL 334 2

San Gabriel EL 334 2

San Jose St 298 2

San Jose HG Mag 87 1

SF Inst of Applied Media 410 2

San Pedro EL 333 2

King Jr EL 239 1

Hollywood Primary Center 41 1

Saticoy EL 302 2

2nd St EL 239 1

Selma EL 111 1

Serrania EL 321 2

7th St EL 247 1

75th St EL 596 3

McKinley EL 416 2

Sharp EL 388 2

Shenandoah EL 214 1

Sheridan St 572 3

Shirley EL 299 2Short EL 192 1

Sierra Park EL 302 2

Sierra Vista 121 1

6th Ave EL 368 2

68th St EL 488 2

61st St EL 292 2

66th St EL 536 3

Solano EL 143 1

Soto EL 137 1

South Park EL 591 3

Harry Bridges Span School 816 4

Dr Owen Lloyd Knox Elem Sch 504 2

S Shores Per Arts Mag 288 2

Wisdom Elementary School 498 2

Jaime Escalante Elem School 344 2

San Miguel EL 404 2

Sn Miguel Mat/Sc Mag 160 1

Montara Ave EL 316 2


36/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Montara Ave EL M/S/T 144 1

Independence Elementary 334 2

Independence ES M/S/T 86 1

Lucille Roybal-Allard ES 322 2

Judith F Baca Arts Academy 345 2

Stagg EL 220 1

Stanford EL 341 2

Stanford Primary Center 0 0

State EL 331 2

Hope Street Elem School 286 2

Sterry EL 152 1

Stonehurst EL 168 1

Stoner EL 175 1

Strathern EL 353 2

Sunland EL 148 1

Sunland ES Gifted 169 1

Sunny Brae EL 300 2

Sunrise EL 272 2

Superior EL 305 2

Sylmar EL 279 2Sylvan Park EL 413 2

Taper EL 232 1

Taper ES Technology 82 1

Tarzana EL 244 1

Telfair EL 422 2

10th St EL 431 2

3rd St EL 343 2

32nd/USC Perf Art Mag 618 3

LAUSD/USC Mth/Sc Mag 252 1

Weemes EL 411 2

Birdielee V Bright EL 366 2

Toland Way EL 204 1

Toluca Lake EL 192 1

Topanga EL 154 1

Topeka Dr EL 243 1

Towne EL 184 1

Trinity EL 320 2

Maple Primary Center 19 1


37/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Tulsa EL 275 2

Tweedy EL 344 2

20th St EL 300 2

28th St EL 387 2

24th St EL 216 1

232nd Pl EL 218 1

Meyler Ave 381 2

Union EL 503 2

Utah EL 337 2

Valerio EL 464 2

Valley Alternative 481 2

Valley View EL 113 1

Alta California Elem School 518 2

Julie Korenstein EL 281 2

Vista Del Valle DL Academy 215 1

Andres & Maria Cardenas ES 292 2

Stanley Mosk Elem School 243 1

Carlos Santana Arts Academy 292 2

Sylmar Leadership Academy 619 3

Vanalden EL 213 1Van Deene EL 230 1

Van Gogh EL 252 2

Van Ness EL 154 1

Columbus Avenue Elementary 282 2

Van Nuys EL 254 2

Vena EL 168 1

Vena G/HA Mag 146 1

Vermont EL 344 2

Vernon City EL 155 1

Victoria EL 255 2

Victory EL 331 2

Vine EL 326 2

Vinedale EL 119 1

Vintage Math/Sci Mag 494 2

Virginia EL 216 1

Walgrove EL 181 1

Warner EL 289 2

Washington Primary Center 0 0


38/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Banning HS Creative & Innov Sci 304 2

Weigand EL 187 1

Welby Way Elem Charter Sch 192 1

Welby Way G/HA Mag 300 2

The Incubator School 50 1

Cesar Chavez Elem School 165 1

West Athens EL 362 2

West Hollywood EL 196 1

West Vernon EL 350 2

Acad of Med Arts@Carson SH 446 2

Acad of Ed & Empt@Carson SH 441 2

Sylmar Promise Acad@sylmar 212 1

Legacy SH Visual and Performing Arts 306 2

Hawkins SH CHAS 432 2

Hawkins SH RISE 394 2

Dymally SH 540 3

Marquez SH Soc Jus 455 2

Westminster EL 59 1

Westminster Comp Sc Mg 118 1

Chavez LA-Soc Jus Hum Acad 421 2Valley Region HS#5-ASE 445 2

Marquez SH Libra 442 2

Bernstein SH STEM 459 2

Westwood EL 399 2

Roosevelt SH Environmental&Social Policy 181 1

Roosevelt SH Math/Science Magnet 307 2

Hilda L Solis Learning Academy 216 1

Lincoln SH LEMA 214 1

Johnson CDS 73 1

White Point EL 240 1

Ambassador Sch-Glbl Ldrshp 596 3

ELA Renaissance AC@Torres HS 365 2

Eng & Tech Ac@Torres HS 372 2

Wilbur EL 311 2

Hum Aca-Art & Tech@Torres HS 344 2

Soc Jus Ldshp Ac@Torres HS 369 2

UCLA Community School 713 3

Wilmington Pk EL 434 2


39/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

New Open World Acad (K-12) 809 4

Wilshire Crest EL 107 1

Wilton Pl EL 442 2

Winnetka EL 203 1

Wonderland EL 141 1

Wonderland G/HA Mag 184 1

Woodlake EL 236 1

Woodland Hills EL 337 2

Woodlawn EL 430 2

Yorkdale EL 190 1

Adams MS 768 3

Adams G/HA Mag 223 1

Bancroft MS 449 2

Bancroft Per Art Mag 427 2

Sal Castro Middle School 475 2

Belvedere MS 1040 4

Belvedere Media Mag 159 1

Belvedere Lat Mus Mag 158 1

Berendo MS 1041 4

John H Liechty MS 1182 5Bethune MS 1199 5

Bethune MS Math/Sci/Tech 169 1

William J Clinton MS 892 4

Young Oak Kim Academy 835 4

Burbank MS 619 3

Burbank MS Math/Sci Magnet 232 1

Burbank MS/Police Acad 71 1

Nava LA-Sch Arts&Cultr 505 2

Byrd MS 1489 6

Byrd Math/Sci Mag 225 1

Jack London Comm Day School 62 1

Sun Valley HS 520 2

Carver MS 1057 5

Columbus MS 539 3

Columbus MS Math/Sci Med 255 1

Dana MS 1505 6

Portola MS 1578 7

Portola HG Mag 242 1


40/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Dodson MS 1176 5

Dodson G/HA Mag 706 3

Edison MS 1188 5

Roy Romer Middle School 1211 5

Vista Middle School 1371 6

El Sereno MS 1069 5

El Sereno Math/Sc Mag 135 1

El Sereno G/HA Mag 100 1

Emerson MS 592 3

Foshay Learning Center 1732 7

Frost MS 1112 5

Frost MS Comp/Math/Sci 431 2

Fulton College Prep School 1772 7

Gage MS 1589 7

Gage MS Math/Science/Tech 283 2

Southeast Middle School 1206 5

Gompers Int 768 3

Griffith MS 1162 5

Griffith Math/Sci Mag 274 2

George E Hale Charter Acad 1948 8Henry MS 681 3

Henry MS Computer/Math/Sci 270 2

Hollenbeck MS 1044 4

Hollenbeck MS M/S/T 236 1

Holmes MS 1150 5

Holmes Int Human Mag 417 2

Irving MS Math/Mus/Eng Magnet 616 3

Los Angeles Academy MS 1639 7

Sch-Visual Arts & Hum@RFK 372 2

Acad Leadershp Community 389 2

King MS Film & Media Magnet 709 3

King MS G/HG/HI Achieving 501 2

King MS Env Studies Mag 460 2

LA Teacher Prep Academy 199 1

Lawrence MS 1103 5

Lawrence MS G/HG/HI Ablty 378 2

Le Conte MS 661 3

Le Conte Int Hum Mag 228 1


41/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Maclay MS 875 4

Madison MS 1370 6

Madison M/Sc/Med Mag 311 2

Marina Del Rey MS 420 2

Marina Del Rey MS Prf Arts 298 2

Markham Int 977 4

Markham Hlth Car Mag 170 1

Millikan MS 1676 7

Millikan Per Art Mag 400 2

Science Academy@Millikan MS 123 1

Mt Gleason MS 770 3

Mt Gleason MS Gftd/Hi Ablty 246 1

Mulholland MS 960 4

Mulholland MS Police Acad 343 2

Nightingale MS 826 4

Nobel MS 1659 7

Nobel Math/Sci Mag 903 4

Northridge MS 832 4

Olive Vista MS 1211 5

Pacoima MS 1106 5Pacoima Tv/Th/FA Mag 240 1

Pacoima Comp/Mth Mag 154 1

Woodland Hills Academy 1150 5

Porter MS 1110 5

Porter G/HA Mag 562 3

Reed MS 1705 7

San Fernando MS 848 4

Sepulveda MS 1216 5

Sepulveda G/HA Mag 413 2

South Gate MS 1961 8

So Gate Math Science Magnet 367 2

Stevenson MS 1676 7

Stevenson G/HA Mag 113 1

Walnut Park MS SJ/SL 502 2

Sun Valley Eng & Tech Magnet 433 2

Sun Valley Env Studies Magnet 367 2

Sun Valley Sc En & Lead Magnet 250 1

Sutter MS 1144 5


42/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Mark Twain MS 426 2

Mark Twain World Lang Mag 268 2

Van Nuys MS 1104 5

Van Nuys M/Sc MS Mag 196 1

Virgil MS 969 4

White MS 1701 7

Wilmington MS 1452 6

Secondary CDS 194 1

Civitas School of Leadership 210 1

LA High Sch of the Arts@RFK 333 2

CDS Aggeler 77 1

Aggeler HS 81 1

Northridge Academy HS 928 4

Ramon C Cortines Sch of VPA 1362 6

Miguel Contreras Lrng Complex 411 2

Harbor Teacher Prep Academy#D8 343 2

School of Social Justice 423 2

Banning SH 1715 7

Banning CIP Mag 249 1

Avalon HS 116 1Belmont SH 771 3

Edward R Roybal Learng Ctr 976 4

Newmark HS 162 1

Daniel Pearl Journ/Comm Mag (NEW) 333 2

Independence HS 127 1

Canoga Park SH 1064 5

Canoga Park Envr Mag 144 1

Canoga Park HS Foreign Lang 166 1

Owensmouth HS 128 1

Carson SH 1275 5

Eagle Tree Contn HS 142 1

Central HS 554 3

Chatsworth Charter High 1791 7

Stoney Point HS 129 1

William J Johnston CDS 165 1

Grover Cleveland Charter High 1927 8

Cleveland Human Mag 668 3

John R Wooden High School 156 1


43/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Crenshaw STEMM Magnet 290 2

Crenshaw VAPA Magnet 321 2

Crenshaw BET Magnet 239 1

Young HS 39 1

Dorsey SH 689 3

Dorsey Math/Sci Mag 89 1

Dorsey Law/Gov Mag 161 1

View Park Contn HS 77 1

ELA Perf Arts Ac@Torres HS 373 2

East Valley High School 682 3

Arleta High School 1210 5

Panorama High School 1313 6

Mendez SH 530 3

Cal Burke HS 182 1

Eagle Rock SH 1567 6

Eagle Rock G/HG/HA Mg 622 3

Wilson SH 1125 5

Wilson Police Academy Mag 102 1

Wilson Adm/Law Mag 166 1

Fairfax SH 1480 6Fairfax Vis Art Mag 318 2

Whitman HS 73 1

Polytechnic SH 2000 8

Poly Math/Sci Mag 287 2

Lewis HS 110 1

Franklin SH 1006 4

Franklin Math/Sci Mag 281 2

Highland Park HS 81 1

Fremont SH 1632 7

Fremont Math/Sci Mag 242 1

Hope HS 100 1

Gardena SH 1175 5

Gardena for Lang Mag 169 1

Moneta HS 82 1

Richard A. Alonzo CDS 174 1

Monterey HS 62 1

Garfield SH 1833 7

Garfield Comp Sci Mag 180 1


44/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Grant HS 1492 6

Grant Com Tech Mag 296 2

London HS 119 1

Hamilton SH 1462 6

Hamilton Mus Aca Mag 753 3

Hamilton Human Mag 290 2

Cheviot Hills HS 82 1

Hollywood SH 973 4

Hollywood Per Art Mg 295 2

Helen Bernstein High School 531 3

Huntington Pk SH 1652 7

Legacy SH International Studies LC 776 3

San Antonio HS 107 1

Early College Academy 138 1

Hawkins SH C/DAGS 481 2

Jefferson SH 934 4

Santee Education Complex 1459 6

Jordan SH 510 2

Rodia HS 95 1

Kennedy SH 1484 6Kennedy HS Arc/Digital Arts 277 2

Addams HS 183 1

Lincoln SH 852 4

Lincoln HS Math/Science 172 1

CDS West Hollywood 52 1

Pueblo De LA HS 93 1

Los Angeles SH 1052 5

LA Math/Sci Mag 244 1

Downtwn Business Mg 538 3

DBM/Electronic Info Mag 287 2

LACES Mag 1445 6

Manual Arts SH 957 4

Manual Arts HS Cllge Prp Mg 210 1

West Adams Preparatory HS 1404 6

Marshall SH 1648 7

Marshall HS G/HG/HI Ablty 355 2

Bravo Medical Mag 1534 6

Metropolitan HS 163 1


45/51



School Name

TOTAL TESTED

POPULATION #

(Grades 3-8, 11; and 9-

10 for interim

assessments)

# CARTS NEEDED (35

DEVICES PER CART)

Monroe SH 1703 7

Monroe Police Academy Mag 127 1

Monroe Law/Gov Mag 205 1

Police Orient & Prep Prog 0 0

Einstein HS 72 1

LA School of Global Studies 278 2

Frida Kahlo High School 153 1

Narbonne SH 2175 9

Narbonne Math/Sc Mag 345 2

Patton HS 66 1

N Hollywood SH 1803 7

N Hllywd Hg Mag 231 1

NHHS/LA Zoo Bio Mag 208 1

Earhart HS 117 1

City of Angels School 1213 5

City of Angels Virtual Academy 13 1

Ramona HS 75 1

Reseda SH 875 4

Reseda HS Police Academy 139 1

Reseda Env/Phy Sc Mag 258 1Reseda HS Law/Public Svc 105 1

Grey HS 197 1

Boyle Heights HS 95 1

Narbonne HS-Humnties&Artsof LA 293 2

Sherman Oaks CES Mag 1845 8

San Fernando SH 1626 7

San Fernando M/Sc Mag 304 2

Mission HS 87 1

San Pedro SH 1900 8

San Pedro HS Police Acdmy 94 1

San Pedro Mar/M/S Mg 300 2

Angel's Gate HS 84 1

Orthopaedic Hosp Med Mag HS 687 3

Marquez SH HPIAM 501 2

South Gate SH 2415 10

Odyssey HS 109 1

Evergreen HS 109 1

Sylmar SH 1207 5

8/13/2019 V

Documents

VARIOUS BOC/CCTP MEETING MATERIALS